請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46016
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯承恩 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hung-Jie Hsieh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 謝宏杰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:51:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Addleman, R. (1994) Governing Board, Know Thyself: A Technique for Self-assessment, Trustee, 47, 24–25.
Arthur, J. B. (1992). 'The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial-Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills.' Industrial & Labor Relations Review 45(3): 488-506. Baysinger, B. and H. Butler (1985). 'Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition.' Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1(1): 101. Bushman, R. and A. Smith (2003). 'Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance.' Economic Policy Review 9(1). Carpenter, M. and J. Westphal (2001). 'The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making.' Academy of Management Journal: 639-660. Daft, R. and K. Weick (1984). 'Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems.' Academy of Management review 9(2): 284-295. Daily, C. and D. Dalton (1994). 'Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure.' Academy of Management Journal 37(6): 1603-1617. Davis, G. G. D. a. P. S. (1984). 'Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance.' The Academy of Management Journal 27(4): 467-488. Davis, J., F. Schoorman, et al. (1997). 'Toward a stewardship theory of management.' Academy of Management review 22(1): 20-47. Donaldson, L. and J. Davis (1991). 'Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns.' Australian Journal of Management, 16(1): 49. Eisenhardt, K. (1985). 'Control: Organizational and economic approaches.' Management Science 31(2): 134-149. Eng, L. and Y. Mak (2003). 'Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure.' Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(4): 325-345. Fama, E. (1980). 'Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.' The Journal of Political Economy 88(2). Fama, E. and M. Jensen (1983). 'Separation of ownership and control.' The journal of law and Economics 26. FORBES, D. P. and F. I. MILLIKEN (1999). 'Cognition and corporate governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups.' Academy of Management Beview 24: 489-505. George, G., D. R. Wood, et al. (2001). 'Networking strategy of boards: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises.' Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 13(3): 269-285. George, W. W. (2002) Imbalance of Power, Harvard Business Review, 80, 22–23. Govindarajan, V. (1989). 'Implementing Competitive Strategies at the Business Unit Level - Implications of Matching Managers to Strategies.' Strategic Management Journal 10(3): 251-269. Groobey, J. A. (1974). 'Making Board of Directors More Effective.' California Management Review 16(3): 25-34. Gul, F. and S. Leung (2004). 'Board leadership, outside directors' expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures.' Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23(5): 351-379. Hambrick, D. and P. Mason (1984). 'Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.' Academy of Management review 9(2): 193-206. Hendry, K. and G. C. Kiel (2004). 'The role of the board in firm strategy: integrating agency and organisational control perspectives.' Corporate Governance-an International Review 12(4): 500-520. Henke Jr, J. (1986). 'Involving the board of directors in strategic planning.' Journal of Business Strategy 7(2): 87-95. Hillman, A. and T. Dalziel (2003). 'Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives.' The Academy of Management Review 28(3): 383-396. Huse, M. (2005). 'Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance.' British Journal of Management 16(1): 65-79. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling (1976). 'Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.' Journal of financial economics 3(4): 305-360. Johnson, J., C. Daily, et al. (1996). 'Boards of directors: A review and research agenda.' Journal of management 22(3): 409. Jonas Gabrielsson and H. Winlund (2000). 'Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: examining the effects of the board's working style on board task performance.' Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 12(4): 311 —330. Judge Jr, W. and C. Zeithaml (1992). 'Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process.' Academy of Management Journal 35(4): 766-794. Judge, W. Q. and C. P. Zeithaml (1992). 'Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision-Process.' Academy of Management Journal 35(4): 766-794. Lorsch, J. W. and MacIver, E. (1989) Pawns or Potentates :The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Luan, C. and M. Tang (2007). 'Where is independent director efficacy?' Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(4): 636-643. Mace, M. (1971). 'Directors: Myth and reality.' Cambridge, MA. Minichilli, A., A. Zattoni, et al. (2009). 'Making Boards Effective: An Empirical Examination of Board Task Performance.' British Journal of Management 20(1): 55-74. Monks, R., & Minow, N. (Eds.). 1995. Corporate governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business. Morgan, F. (1990). 'Judicial standards for survey research: an update and guidelines.' The Journal of Marketing 54(1): 59-70. Pfeffer, J. (1973). 'Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage.' Administrative Science Quarterly 18(3): 349-364. Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Stanford Business Books. Power, C. (1987) Shareholders Aren’t Just Rolling Over Anymore, Business Week, (2996), 32–33. Rosenstein, J. (1987). 'Why don't US boards get more involved in strategy?' Long Range Planning 20(3): 30-34. Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny (1997). 'A survey of corporate governance.' Journal of finance 52(2): 737-783. Slater, S. E. and J. C. Narver (1996). 'Competitive Strategy in the Market-Focused Business.' Journal of Market Focused Managemen 1: 159-174. Slater, S. F. and E. M. Olson (2000). 'Strategy type and performance: The influence of sales force management.' Strategic Management Journal 21(8): 813-829. Stede, W. A. V. d., S. M. Young, et al. (2005). 'Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies ' Accounting, Organizations and Society 30: 655-684. Tashakori, A., W. Boulton, et al. (1983). 'A look at the board's role in planning.' Journal of Business Strategy 3(2): 64-70. Tricker, R. I. B. (1999) The Board’s Role in Strategy Making, Chartered Secretary, December, 8–11. Walker, L. W. (1999) Governing Board, Know Thyself, Trustee, 52, 14–19. Ward, P. T. and R. Duray (2000). 'Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy.' Journal of Operations Management 18(2): 123-138. Weidenbaum, M. (1985) The Best Defense Against Raiders, Business Week, (2913), 2–3. Westphal, J. D. (1999). 'Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties.' Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 7-24. White, R. E. (1986). 'Generic Business Strategies, Organizational Context and Performance: An Empirical Investigation.' Strategic Management Journal, 7: 217-223/. White, R. E. (1986). 'Generic Business Strategies, Organizational Context and Performance: An Empirical Investigation.' Strategic Management Journal, 7: 217-223/. Young, G., R. I. Beekun, et al. (1992). 'Governing Board Structure, Business Strategy, and Performance of Acute Care Hospitals - a Contingency Perspective.' Health Services Research 27(4): 543-564. Zahra, S. A. and J. G. Covin (1993). 'Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance.' Strategic Management Journal 14(6): 451-478. Zahra, S. and J. Pearce (1989). 'Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model.' Journal of management 15(2): 291. 吳成豐、鄭國鴻(2005),「公司治理與組織績效之相關性研究―以台灣中小企業為研究對象」,中華管理評論國際學報,8卷3期 翁林威(2002),「企業資源規劃系統(ERP)導入與資訊策略、企業策略之研究」,國立中央大學碩士論文 財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會(2002)「我國公司治理」 馬瑜雵(2003),「我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學碩士論文 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46016 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要探討企業所使用的競爭策略對獨立董事職能的影響,獨立董事職能的部分,本研究將其劃分為控制職能(control task)與服務職能(service task),再根據行為焦點的差異,細分為,(1)建議與諮詢職能(advice and counsel)(2)企業網絡職能(networking and lobbying)(3)行為控制職能(behavioural control)(4)產出控制職能(output control);另一方面,企業的競爭策略則以(1)成本領導策略(cost leadership strategy)(2)差異化策略(differentiation strategy),作為分類的依據。
本研究利用問卷調查的方式,取得相關的研究資料,其設計係針對曾經擔任過獨立董事的人士,無論現任與否,皆可以過去的經驗與個人的認知,填寫本研究之問卷;針對現任董事,本研究採用郵寄的方式發送問卷,而卸任獨立董事的部分,則採電子郵件的方式,確保問卷能有效的送達受訪對象。本研究總共發放問卷711份,回收了138份問卷,有效問卷為133份,回卷率為18.71%。此外,為了瞭解我國獨立董事實務參與的狀況,本研究也利用了發放問卷的機會,針對獨立董事的專長項目以及各職能行為的實際參與狀況進行了調查。 本研究主要結論如下:採行成本領導策略的企業會注重獨立董事的「行為控制職能」、「產出控制職能」以及「建議與諮詢職能」等控制職能;採行差異化策略的企業,則會強調「建議與諮詢職能」、「企業網絡職能」、「行為控制職能」以及「產出控制職能」等;換句話說,相較於成本領導策略,差異化策略更需要獨立董事履行相關的職能,以協助企業取得競爭優勢。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study is about the association between functions of independent directors and competitive strategy. The functions of independent directors were classified as (1) control task and (2) service task. Specifically, control task can be subdivided into (a) behavioural control task and (b) output control task. Similarly, service task can be subdivided into (c) advice and counsel task (d) networking and lobbying task. Moreover, the competitive strategies were classified as (i) cost leadership strategy and (ii) differentiation strategy.
A questionnaire was mailed to 711 independent directors representing different industries. 133 completed questionnaires were received from independent directors, for a response rate of 18.71%. Moreover, in order to understand effect of independent director mechanism in Taiwan, we also investigate the background and expertise of each respondent. This study concluded that (a) Cost leadership strategy correlates with behavioural control task, output control task and advice and counsel task. (b) Differentiation strategy correlates with all the functions of independent directors. In other words, differentiation strategy may stress strong emphasis on functions of independent directors. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:51:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97722030-1.pdf: 889682 bytes, checksum: 10ff319460ab13f8d0486a4617043d35 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝詞...................................................... I
摘要......................................................II Abstract.................................................III 第一章緒論 ............................................... 6 ...第一節研究背景與動機 .................................. 6 ...第二節研究目的 ........................................ 9 ...第三節研究範圍 .........................................9 第二章文獻回顧 ...........................................10 第一節董事會的職能 ....................................10 第二節獨立董事的職能 ..................................17 第三節競爭策略 ....................................... 24 第三章研究設計與方法 .................................... 31 第一節研究流程與架構 ................................. 31 第二節問卷設計 ....................................... 32 第三節研究對象與資料來源 ............................. 34 第四節研究問題的確立 ................................. 34 第五節分析方法 ....................................... 37 第四章研究結果 ........................... ............. 40 第一節初步分析 ....................................... 40 第二節相關性分析 ..................................... 49 第三節變異數分析 ..................................... 55 第四節無母數統計分析 ................................. 58 第五章結論 .............................................. 65 第一節研究結果 ....................................... 65 第二節研究限制 ....................................... 66 第三節未來研究建議 .............................. .... 67 參考文獻................................................. 68 附錄A:獨立董事問卷調查表................................ 72 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 獨立董事職能與企業競爭策略關聯性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Association between Functions of Independent Directors and Competitive Strategy | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖芝嫻,蘇裕惠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 獨立董事,競爭策略,董事會職能,獨立董事職能, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Independent Director,Competitive Strategy,Board Task and functions of independent directors, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 868.83 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。