請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4598
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 孫家棟 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Chi Su | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蘇文祺 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:43:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:43:55Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-09-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. World Health Organization. Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Publication date: 2014, Available at http://www.who.int/mental_health/suicide-prevention/world_report_2014/en/
2. 衛生福利部心理及口腔健康司, 自殺防治系列2-自殺防範指引. p.16, Available at http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOMHAOH/DM1.aspx?f_list_no=179&fod_list_no=5285 3. World Health Organization. World : Age-standardized suicide rates (per 100 000 population), both sexes, 2012.Date : 03/Sep/2014, Available at http://gamapserver.who.int/mapLibrary/app/searchResults.aspx 4. 衛生福利部心理及口腔健康司, 歷年全國自殺死亡資料統計暨自殺通報統計.Available at http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOMHAOH/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_no=179&fod_list_no=5269&doc_no=47545 5. Kim, C. D., Seguin, M., Therrien, N., Riopel, G., Chawky, N., Lesage, A. D., andTurecki, G.,Familial aggregation of suicidal behavior: A family study of male suicide completers from the general population.Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 1017–1019. 6. Lu, T.H., Chang, W.T., Lin, J.J., and Li, C.Y., Suicide method runs in families: a birth certificate cohort study of adolescent suicide in Taiwan.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011;41:685-689. 7. Van BeeckE.F., Suicide and Self-Directed Violence. Encyclopedia of Public Health. 2008; 267-275. 8. National Association of Medical Examiners. A Guide For Manner of Death Classification. 2002, Available at https://netforum.avectra.com/temp/ClientImages/NAME/38c0f1d2-11ec-45c7-80ca-ff872d0b22bc.pdf 9. Lin, J.J. and Lu, T.H., Suicide mortality trends by sex, age and method in Taiwan, 1971–2005.BMC Public Health.2008;8:6-12. 10. 孫孝賢, 臺灣桃園地區2001年至2011年一氧化碳中毒自殺死亡案件之分析. 2012;台灣大學法醫學研究所. 11. Lin, J.J., Chang, S.S., and Lu, T.H., The leading methods of suicide in Taiwan, 2002-2008.BMC Public Health.2010;10:480-488. 12. Chen, Y.Y., Yip, P.S., Lee, C.K., Gunnell, D., and Wu, K.C.C.,The diffusion of a new method of suicide: charcoal-burning suicide in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.2015; 50:227–236. 13. Van Orden, K.A., Witte, T.K., Cukrowicz, K.C., Braithwaite, S.R., Selby, E.A., and Joiner, T.E. Jr.,The interpersonal theory of suicide.Psychol Rev. 2010; 117: 575-600. 14. 林上倫,陳易隆,鍾廷聖,曾冬勝, 亙古難題-人為何會自殺?臺灣醫界.2013;56(9):44-48. 15. Cavanagh, J. T., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., and Lawrie, S. M., Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: A systematic review.Psychol Med.2003;33:395–405. 16. Isometsä E.T., Psychological autopsy studies--a review. Eur Psychiatry. 2001; 16(7):379-85. 17. Ernst, C., Lalovic, A., Lesage, A., Seguin, M., Tousignant, M., and Turecki, G.,Suicide and no axis I psychopathology.BMC Psychiatry.2004; 4:7. 18. 衛生福利部心理及口腔健康司, 自殺防治人員工作手冊-醫療機構 p.2,Available at http://www.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW 19. Christiansen, E., and Jensen, B. F.,Risk of repetition of suicide attempt, suicide or all deaths after an episode of attempted suicide: Aregister-based survival analysis.Aust N Z J Psychiatry.2007; 41: 257–265. 20. Suominen, K., Isometsa, E., Haukka, J., &Lönnqvist, J. Substance use and male gender as risk factors for deaths and suicide—A 5-year follow-up study after deliberate self-harm.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.2004; 39: 720–724. 21. 衛生福利部心理及口腔健康司, 自殺防治系列24-重複自殺個案之關懷管理. p.6-7, Available at http://www.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW 22. Yip P.S.F., Yousuf S., Chan C.H., Yung T., and Wu K.C.,The roles of culture and gender in the relationship between divorce and suicide risk: A meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med.2015; 128: 87-94. 23. Yip, P.S.F., Chen, Y.Y., Yousuf, S., Lee, C.K.M., Kawano, K., Routley, V., Park, B.C.B.,Yamauchi, T., Tachimori, H., Clapperton, A., and Wu, K.C.-C., Towards a reassessment of the role of divorce in suicide outcomes: evidence from five pacific rim populations. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75 (2): 358-366. 24. Chew, K. S., and McCleary, R., The spring peak in suicides: Across-national analysis. Soc Sci Med.1995;40(2): 223–230. 25. Tsai J.F., and Cho W.,Re-examination of the seasonality of suicide in Taiwan during 1991-2008: a population-based study.Psychiatry Res. 2011;186(1):147-9. 26. Tsai J.F.,and Cho W.,Temperature change dominates the suicidal seasonality in Taiwan: a time-series analysis.J Affect Disord. 2012;136(3):412-8. 27. Lorin de la Grandmaison G., Fermanian C., and Durigon M.,Analysis of discrepancies between external body examination and forensic autopsy.Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29(1):40-2. 28. Kapusta N.D., Tran U.S., Rockett I.R., De Leo D., Naylor C.P., Niederkrotenthaler T., Voracek M., Etzersdorfer E., and Sonneck G., Declining autopsy rates and suicide misclassification: a cross-national analysis of 35 countries.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(10):1050-7. 29. Frost J., Slørdal L., Vege Å., and Nordrum I.S.,Forensic autopsies in a naturalistic setting in Norway: autopsy rates and toxicological findings.Forensic Sci Int. 2012;223(1-3):353-8. 30. Shields L.B., Hunsaker D.M., Hunsaker J.C. 3rd, and Ward M.K., Toxicologic Findings in Suicide A 10-Year Retrospective Review of Kentucky Medical Examiner Cases.Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006;27: 106–112. 31. Illinois Coroners and Medical Examiners Association, Guidelines for the Determination of Manner of Death. 2007, Available at http://www.coronersillinois.org/images/laws/guidelines-determination-manner-of-death.pdf 32. Timmermans, S., Suicide determination and the professional authority of medical examiners.American Sociological Review. 2005; 70: 311–333. 33. Paraschakis, A., Michopoulos, I., Douzenis, A., Christodoulou, C., Koutsaftis, F., andLykouras, L., Differences between suicide victims who leave notes and those who do not: A 2-year study in Greece.Crisis.2012; 33: 344–349. 34. Cerel J., Moore M., Brown M.M., van de Venne J., and Brown S.L.,Who Leaves Suicide Notes? A Six-Year Population-Based Study. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015;45(3):326-34. 35. Callanan, V. J., and Davis, M. S.,A comparison of suicide note writers with suicides who did not leave notes.Suicide Life Threat Behav.2009; 39: 558–568. 36. Kuwabara H., Shioiri T., Nishimura A., Abe R., Nushida H., Ueno Y., Akazawa K., and Someya T.,Differences in characteristics between suicide victims who left notes or not.J Affect Disord.2006;94: 145–149. 37. Ho, T. P., Yip, P. S., Chiu, C. W., and Halliday, P., Suicide notes: what do they tell us? ActaPsychiatr Scand.1998; 98: 467–473. 38. Chávez-Hernández A.M., Páramo D., Leenaars A.A., and Leenaars L., Suicide notes in Mexico: what do they tell us? Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2006;36(6):709-15. 39. Gunn J.F. 3rd, Lester D., Haines J., and Williams C.L.,Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness in suicide notes.Crisis. 2012;33(3):178-81. 40. 衛生福利部統計處, 97至102年各年度死因統計年報. Available at http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=1610 41. 臺灣高雄地方法院檢察署,機關簡介-管轄區域. 2015; Available at http://www.ksc.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4002&CtNode=5749&mp=021 42. 內政部,內政統計查詢網. Available at http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100 43. 洪永泰,莊義利,陳怡如,翁文舜,劉季鑫,梁賡義,台灣地區鄉鎮市區發展類型應用於大型健康調查抽樣設計之研究.健康管理學刊. 2006; 4(1):1-22. 44. 交通部中央氣象局, 102年氣候年報. Available at http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/service/notice/download/publish_20150109111102.pdf 45. Girdhar S., Leenaars A.A., Dogra T.D., Leenaars L., and Kumar G.,Suicide notes in India: what do they tell us?Arch Suicide Res. 2004;8(2):179-85. 46. Freuchen A., and Grøholt B., Characteristics of suicide notes of children and young adolescents: An examination of the notes from suicide victims 15 years and younger.Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;20(2):194-206. 47. 鄭兆峰, 台灣南投地區2008年至2012年農藥中毒自殺死亡案例分析. 2014;台灣大學法醫學研究所. 48. Ylijoki-Sørensen S., Boldsen J.L., Boel L.W., Bøggild H., Lalu K., and Sajantila A., Autopsy rate in suicide is low among elderly in Denmark compared with Finland. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;244:158-65. 49. Ohberg A., Vuori E., OjanperäI.,and Lonngvist J., Alcohol and drugs in suicides. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169(1):75-80. 50. Wong P.W., Yeung A.W., Chan W.S., Yip P.S., and Tang A.K., Suicide notes in Hong Kong in 2000.Death Stud. 2009;33(4):372-81. 51. Sanger S., and Veach P.M., The interpersonal nature of suicide: a qualitative investigation of suicide notes.Arch Suicide Res. 2008;12(4):352-65. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4598 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 依衛生福利部資料,2013年高雄地區自殺粗死亡率為每十萬人口16.2人,高於全國平均值(12.0人),但目前少有文獻探討有關高雄地區自殺之司法相驗案件。為研究此類案件人口學及個案背景特徵,本研究針對高雄地區2013年484件自殺案件,以去聯結方式收集個案下列資訊:性別,年齡,婚姻狀況,居住所,居住狀況,保險狀況,精神病史,物質濫用史,自殺方法,自殺原因,事發地點,死亡時間,有否解剖,有否遺書,和遺書內容。本研究中自殺案件有下列特徵:男性334人,女性150人,男女人數比2.23:1,死亡率以65歲以上(每十萬人口31.2人)及離婚(每十萬人口56.0人)為最高,其中68.8%與家人同住,93.7%居住於中高程度都市化地區,42.6%有商業保險,40.3%有精神病史,12.6%有物質濫用史, 27.5%曾有自殺行為,31.8%上吊自殺,26.2%自殺原因為精神健康問題,和67.5%於自宅自殺。本研究中,自殺案件司法解剖率12.0%,經由司法解剖之自殺案件有下列特徵:在15-24歲(25.0%),獨居(15.9%),未婚(17.0%),有物質濫用史(19.7%),溺水(23.3%)和施用毒藥物(20.0%),事發地點為河海港口(25.0%)有較高之解剖率。本研究中,遺留遺書比例為34.7%,遺留遺書者有下列特徵:在25-44歲(43.2%),燒炭(51.3%),自殺原因為人際情感(48.6%)和工作經濟(41.2%)有較高比例遺留遺書;遺書內容比例較高者有:向親友道別(62.4%),後事處理(41.4%),財務處理(38.2%),撐不下去(30.6%),自責(29.3%),抱怨其他人事物(29.3%)。本研究描繪了自殺案件之輪廓,希望對未來自殺案件司法相驗及自殺防治有所幫助。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | From the data published by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan, the crude suicide rate of Kaohsiung city in 2013 was 16.2 per 100,000 which was higher than the national average (12.0 per 100,000). Up to now, there is a paucity of study referred to the death investigations of suicide cases in Kaohsiung city.To investigate the characteristics of the demography and the circumstance of these cases, we collected the following information with de-linked for all 484 suicide cases (334 men and 150 women) in 2013 in Kaohsiung city, including gender, age, marital status, residence, residential state, condition of insurance, history of psychiatric disorders, history of substance abuse, previous suicidal behavior, suicide method, reason for suicide, occurrence site, time of death, completing forensic autopsy or not,leaving suicide note or not, and contents of suicide notes. Suicide cases in Kaohsiung city had the following characteristics:the sex ratio of suicide victims was 2.23 (male/female).There were higher proportion in people aged 65 or above (31.2 per 100,000), divorced population (56.0 per 100,000), people living with family (68.8%), the inhabitants of high and medium urbanization area(93.7%), suicide by hanging(31.8%), suicide for reasons of psychiatric illness(26.2%)and suicide at home(67.5%). 42.6% were insured, 40.3% were suffering from psychiatric illness, 12.6% were substance abusers,27.5% had previously attempted suicide.The total forensic autopsy rate was 12.0% in our study. The suicide cases arranged for forensic autopsy had the following characteristics: higher autopsy rate in the age group 15-24y/o(25.0%), living alone(15.9%), single(17.0%), substance abuser(19.7%), suicide by drowning(23.3%) and poisoning(20.0%) and suicide in water area(25.0%).The incidence of suicide note-leaving was 34.7% in our study. Suicide note writers in our study had the following characteristics: higher proportion in the age group 25-44 y/o (43.2%), suicide by charcoal-burning(51.3%), suicide for reasons of problem in interpersonal relationship(48.6%) and socioeconomic problem(41.2%). The contents of suicide notes included farewell to relatives and friends(62.4%), funeral arrangement(41.4%), financial arrangement(38.2%), tiredness(30.6%), self-blame(29.3%) and blame others for suicide(29.3%).From this study, we drawn the profiles of the suicide cases. We hope these results will give some help in death investigations of suicide cases and prevention of suicide in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:43:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R96452009-1.pdf: 5579138 bytes, checksum: b9fcbde6cb6cf98b92f52a2b53ca1036 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究範圍 2 第四節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 自殺的定義 4 第二節 自殺案件人口學特徵 4 第三節 自殺方法 5 第四節 自殺原因 6 第五節 自殺理論:人際—自殺論 6 第六節 與自殺相關之危險因子 7 6.1 精神疾病 7 6.2 生理疾病 7 6.3 個人自殺史 8 6.4 婚姻狀況 8 6.5 季節變動 9 第七節 自殺案件與司法解剖 9 第八節 自殺案件與遺書 11 第三章 材料與方法 13 第一節 資料來源 13 第二節 研究案件範圍 13 第三節 研究資料之紀錄 13 3.1 收集資料種類 13 3.2 案主人口學資料 13 3.3 案件背景資料 14 3.4 司法解剖資料 14 3.5 遺書內容資料 14 第四節 研究項目定義 14 4.1 年齡及年齡分層 14 4.2 居住所及居住所分層 14 4.3 居住狀況及自殺地點 15 4.4 自殺方法 15 4.5 自殺原因 15 4.6 自殺季節 15 4.7 安排解剖原因 16 4.8 遺書內容分析 16 第五節 案件有無解剖之比較 17 第六節 有無留遺書案件之比較 17 第七節 資料建檔與分析 17 第四章 結果 19 第一節 高雄地區2008至2013年自殺死亡者自殺方式統計 19 第二節 高雄地區2013年自殺死亡者自殺方式詳細分析 19 第三節 高雄地區2013年自殺案件基本資料呈現與描述 19 3.1 人口學特徵分析 20 3.2 案件背景特徵分析 20 第四節 交叉分析 21 4.1 自殺死亡者年齡與自殺方法 21 4.2 自殺死亡者居住所與自殺方法 21 4.3 自殺死亡者年齡與自殺原因 22 4.4 自殺死亡者年齡與居住所 22 第五節 解剖案件 22 5.1 各類型案件解剖比例 22 5.2 自殺案件安排解剖原因 23 5.3 有無解剖之自殺案件人口學特徵比較 23 5.4 有無解剖之自殺案件案件背景特徵比較 24 5.5 解剖案件毒物化學檢測結果 24 第六節 有留遺書之案件 25 6.1 有無留遺書案件案主人口學特徵比較 25 6.2 有無留遺書案件案件背景特徵比較 26 6.3 遺書內容分析 26 第七節 自殺方法重複性 27 第八節 施用毒藥物自殺案件使用之毒藥物分析 27 第九節 施用農藥自殺者居住所都市化程度分析 27 第五章 討論 29 第一節 高雄地區歷年自殺案件之統計分析 29 第二節 2013年高雄地區自殺案件人口學特徵 30 第三節 2013年高雄地區自殺案件背景特徵 31 第四節 自殺案件與司法解剖 32 4.1 自殺案件解剖率 33 4.2 自殺案件安排解剖原因 33 4.3 有安排解剖之自殺案件人口學及案件背景特徵 34 4.4 解剖案件毒物化學檢測結果 36 第五節 遺書分析 37 5.1 遺留遺書比例 37 5.2 有留遺書自殺者人口學及案件背景特徵 38 5.3 遺書內容 39 第六章 結論 41 參考文獻 44 附錄 48 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 2013年度高雄地區自殺案件之分析研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Annual Review of Suicide Cases of Kaohsiung City in 2013 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方中民,蕭開平 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 高雄,自殺,司法解剖,司法解剖率,遺書, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Kaohsiung,Suicide,Forensic autopsy,Forensic autopsy rate,Suicide notes, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法醫學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf | 5.45 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。