請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45893完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭福田 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Yu Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡承祐 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:48:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-09 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-09 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Lei, Y.; Shichen, J.; Qinyi, S. A Synthesis of Transportation Emissions Research: Current Status and Future Directions, Southwest Region University Transportation Center Texas Transportation Institute, Report SWUTC/08/473700-00049-1, 2008.
2. 逄士豪、郭博堯，可攜式車載排放量測系統於美國移動污染源檢測之發展與應用，化工技術，第186期，2008年9月。 3. Frey, H. C.; Unal, A.; Chen, J.; Li, S. Modeling Mobile Source Emissions Based Upon In-Use and Second-by-Second Data: Development of Conceptual Approaches for EPA’s New MOVES Model, Proceedings, Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 2003. 4. Rakha, H.; Ding, Y. Impact of Stops on Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Emissions, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2003, 129 , 23. 5. Ahn, K.; Rakha, H.; Trani, A.; Aerde, M. V. Estimating Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Emissions based on Instantaneous Speed and Acceleration Levels, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2002, 128, 182. 6. Frey, H. C.; Zhang, K.; Rouphail, N. M. Fuel Use and Emissions Comparisons for Alternative Routes, Time of Day, Road Grade, and Vehicles Based on In-Use Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 2483. 7. Frey, H. C.; Zhang, K. Implications of Measured In-Use Light Duty Gasoline Vehicle Emissions for Emission Inventory Development at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution, Annual International Emission Inventory Conference, Raleigh, NC, 2007. 8. Frey, H. C.; Rasdorf, W.; Kim, K.; Pang, S.; Lewis, P.; Abolhassani, S. Real-World Duty Cycles and Utilization for Construction Equipment in North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Transportation Research and Development, Research Project No. FHWA/NC/ 2006 - 55, 2008. 9. Zhang, K.; Fery, C. Evaluation of Response Time of a Portable System for In-Use Vehicle Tailpipe Emissions Measurement, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2008, 42, 221. 10. Andre, M. Driving Cycles Development: Characterization of the Methods, SAE International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, SAE paper 961112, 1996. 11. Esteves-Booth, A.; Muneer, T.; Kubie, J.; Kirby, H. A review of vehicular emission models and driving cycles Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2002, 216, 777. 12. US EPA website, http://www.epa.gov/. 13. Jiménez-Palacios, J. L. Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions with Vehicle Specific Power and TILDAS Remote Sensing, Department of Mechanical Engineering In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering. 1999. 14. 溫蓓章, 能源消耗、污染排放與運輸規劃作業關聯分析之研究(1/2), 交通部運輸研究所, 97-78-1247, 2008。 15. Krzyzanowski, M.; Kuna-Dibbert, B.; Schneider, J. Health effects of transport-related air pollution, World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, DK, 2005. 16. Colvile, R. N.; Hutchinson, E. J.; Mindell, J. S.; Warren, R. F. The transport sector as a source of air pollution, Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35, 1537 17. Air Quality Expert Group, Nitrogen Dioxide in the United Kingdom ,Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, 2004. 18. Glandt, E. D.; Klein, M. T.; Edger, T. F. Air Pollution Control Engineering, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, second edition, 2000. 19. Weilenmann, M. F.; Vasic, A. M.; Stettler, P.; Novok, P. Influence of Mobile Air-Conditioning on Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Consumption A Model Approach or Modern Gasoline Cars Used in Europe, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2005, 39, 9601. 20. Younglove, T.; Scora, G.; Barth, M. Designing On-Road Vehicle Test Programs for Effective Vehicle Emission Model Development, Transportation Research Record, Paper No. 05-2770, 2005. 21. Emmelman, H. J.; Hucho, W. H. Performance of Cars and Light Trucks, Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, 4th Ed. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1998. 22. Kwon, J.; Rousseau, A.; Sharer, P. Analyzing the Uncertainty in the Fuel Economy Prediction for the EPA MOVES Binning Methodology, Argonne National Laboratory, April 19, 2007 23. Clean Air Technologies International, Inc., AXION Gas Measurement Accuracy and Resolution, 2008. 24. Clean Air Technologies International, Inc., User ’s Manual Version 2.0, 2008. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45893 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究利用車載排放量測系統(Portable Emission Measurement System, PEMS)量測汽油小客車於台北縣市選取之綜合路徑污染物排放情形，及於實驗室動力計上同時以實驗室CVS-9000量測系統、車載排放量測系統量測FTP75及US06行車型態之污染物排放情形，實驗之參數為開、關冷氣，量測之污染物包括CO2、CO、HC、NOX。藉以探討不同道路型態、不同量測設備及不同行車型態間之污染物排放情形，並利用車輛比功率(Vehicle Specific Power, VSP)及North Carolina State University (NCSU)之VSP Mode分類方式討論污染物排放趨勢，最後比較NCSU VSP Mode、Argonne National Laboratory VSP Mode及本研究所分類之Taipei VSP Mode等三種VSP Mode分法應用於本研究量測數據之適用性。
實驗結果發現，車載排放量測系統可分析出不同道路型態、各污染物之排放率，但以道路型態討論因沒有考慮加速度、停等及坡度等因素，可能出現不符預期之污染物排放趨勢。而應用車輛比功率及NCSU VSP Mode討論可發現CO2、CO、NOX除了於高VSP Mode外皆有符合預期之趨勢。於三種不同VSP Mode分法中Taipei VSP Mode對於CO2、HC及NOX之排放趨勢較佳、信賴區間也皆較NCSU VSP Mode及Argonne小，可見以本土數據特性進行分類的Taipei VSP Mode較適合應用於本研究之量測數據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this study, a portable emission measurement system (PEMS) was used to acquire emission data from a gasoline vehicle by proceeding the on-road tests and dynamometer tests. A route ranging over Taipei county and Taipei city and consisting of comprehensive types of roads was designed for the real road tests. Regarding the dynamometer tests, FTP75and US06 driving cycles were used to evaluate the difference between PEMS and CVS-9000 system. According to the experimental results, the effects of operation conditions including road type, AC condition, driving cycle and measurement system on CO2, CO, HC, NOX emissions were determined. Vehicle specific power (VSP) was used as a variable to explain the emission trends of pollutants and evaluate the applicability of different definitions of VSP modes - North Carolina State University (NCSU) VSP Mode, Argonne National Laboratory VSP Mode and Taipei VSP Mode.
In terms of the experimental result, PEMS can be used to measure the emission rate of gasoline vehicle driving on different road types. By taking VSP Mode into consideration, the emission trends of CO2, CO and NOX coincide with our expectation (CO2, CO and NOX emissions exhibit expectable trends) except for the conditions of high VSP Mode. Among the different definitions of VSP modes, Taipei VSP Mode can explain emissions trends of CO2, HC, NOX with smaller confidence intervals and more coincidence with the expectation than NCSU VSP Mode and Argonne VSP Mode do. Consequently, Taipei VSP Mode defined on the basis of local driving conditions is more applicable to the experimental data in this study. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:48:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97541133-1.pdf: 1251296 bytes, checksum: 8e3656f59075d824455b6b1b27ba43fb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言 1
1.1 研究緣起 1 1.2 研究目標 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1 車載排放量測系統簡介與研究 3 2.2 行車型態 6 2.2.1 動力計 6 2.2.2 FTP75行車型態 6 2.2.3 US06行車型態 7 2.3汽車空氣污染物排放與影響 11 2.3.1汽車空氣污染物排放與影響 11 2.3.2 汽車空氣污染物排放與空燃比及觸媒轉換效率之關係 12 2.4 空調對汽車空氣污染物排放之影響 14 2.5 移動源排放係數 20 2.5.1 我國現行移動源排放係數推估方法 20 2.5.2 移動源排放量推估的發展趨勢 20 2.5.2.1 Mobile5a模式之排放係數估算方式 20 2.5.2.2 Mobile5a之後的美國模式發展及車載量測系統的使用 21 2.6 以引擎負載變化估算汽車空氣污染物排放 21 第三章 實驗設備與規劃 27 3.1實驗設備 27 3.1.1 車載量排放測系統(Portable Emissions Measurement Systems , PEMS) 27 3.1.2 車上診斷系統(On-Board Diagnostic, OBD) 29 3.1.3 全球定位系統(Global Positioning System，GPS) 30 3.1.4 行車影像記錄器 30 3.2 實驗規劃 31 3.2.1 實驗架構 31 3.2.2 測試項目規劃 31 第四章 結果與討論 37 4.1探討道路型態對污染物排放之影響 37 4.1.1 道路型態對污染物排放之影響 37 4.1.1.1 道路型態對CO2排放之影響 37 4.1.1.2 道路型態對CO排放之影響 41 4.1.1.3 道路型態對HC排放之影響 45 4.1.1.4 道路型態對NOX排放之影響 49 4.1.2 高速公路下坡(林口坡)之CO2排放趨勢討論 51 4.2 應用車輛比功率(VSP)分析車輛於實際道路行駛之污染物排放研究 57 4.2.1 應用車輛比功率(VSP)分析車輛於實際道路行駛之CO2排放研究 58 4.2.2 應用車輛比功率(VSP)分析車輛於實際道路行駛之CO排放研究 61 4.2.3 應用車輛比功率(VSP)分析車輛於實際道路行駛之HC排放研究 64 4.2.4 應用車輛比功率(VSP)分析車輛於實際道路行駛之NOX排放研究 71 4.3應用車輛比功率(VSP)分析於實際道路、FTP75及US06行車型態間之差異 73 4.3.1 實驗室CVS-9000量測系統與車載排放量測系統之比較及空調之影響 73 4.3.2 PEMS所測得實際道路、FTP75及US06行車型態污染物排放之影響 79 4.3.2.1 PEMS所測得實際道路、FTP75及US06行車型態CO2排放之影響 80 4.3.2.2 PEMS所測得實際道路、FTP75及US06行車型態CO排放之影響 82 4.3.2.3 PEMS所測得實際道路、FTP75及US06行車型態HC排放之影響 84 4.3.2.4 PEMS所測得實際道路、FTP75及US06行車型態NOX排放之影響 87 4.3.3 應用NSCU VSP Mode之道路實測、FTP75及US06行車型態CO2排放率討論於台北縣市選取路徑CO2排放總量之比較 88 4.4不同車輛比功率(VSP)分類於台北縣市選取路線之適用性 90 4.4.1不同車輛比功率(VSP)對CO2排放分類於台北縣市選取路線之適用性 90 4.4.2不同車輛比功率(VSP)對CO排放分類於台北縣市選取路線之適用性 93 4.4.3不同車輛比功率(VSP)對HC排放分類於台北縣市選取路線之適用性 95 4.4.4不同車輛比功率(VSP)對NOX排放分類於台北縣市選取路線之適用性 97 第五章 結論與建議 99 參考文獻 103 附錄一 107 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 車輛比功率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 車載排放量測系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 動力計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 行車型態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 空調 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | dynamometer | en |
| dc.subject | vehicle specific power | en |
| dc.subject | air conditioning | en |
| dc.subject | driving cycle | en |
| dc.subject | portable emission measurement system | en |
| dc.title | 應用車載排放量測系統於汽油小客車行駛實際道路
空氣污染物排放之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | On-Road emission measurements of a gasoline vehicle by portable emission measurement system | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡俊鴻,林文印,張艮輝,郭博堯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 車載排放量測系統,動力計,行車型態,空調,車輛比功率, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | portable emission measurement system,dynamometer,driving cycle,air conditioning,vehicle specific power, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 122 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。