請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4580
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林麗雲(Lihyun Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | An-Chi Ma | en |
dc.contributor.author | 馬安奇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:43:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-10 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:43:40Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王亞維(2012)。〈電視媒體問責起源與發展—論國內外制度理論與實踐〉,中華傳播學會年會。取自http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57205
尤柔淳摘譯 (2011)。MediaAcT〈上〉。上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://nccwatch.org.tw/news/20110804/93739 尤柔淳摘譯 (2011)。MediaAcT〈下〉。上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://nccwatch.org.tw/news/20110805/93752 台灣媒體觀察教育基金會 (2013)。〈提名與審查要公開 公民與專業要進場:公民團體針對公視董事審查聯合聲明〉。上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://www.mediawatch.org.tw/node/3884 白富美譯 (1987)。〈BBC的經營與管理(上) 〉,《新聞學研究》,39, 387-418。原書Briggs , A.(1979)Governing the BBC. 取自http://mcr.nccu.edu.tw/issueArticle.asp?P_No=19&CA_ID=142 李羏(2012)。〈探討英國公共法人組織的董事任命機制: 從2012年BBC Trust延攬新董事談起〉,公共電視岩花館。上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://rnd.pts.org.tw/p2/2012/03/UK%20Chief%20of%20Board%20Electing.pdf 李英明(2005)。《新制度主義與社會資本》。台北市: 揚智文化。 李國煌譯 (1987)。〈BBC的經營與管理(下) 〉,《新聞學研究》,39, 419-444。原書Briggs , A.(1979)Governing the BBC. 取自http://mcr.nccu.edu.tw/issueArticle.asp?P_No=19&CA_ID=143 谷玲玲、劉幼琍 (2011)。〈我國公共電視體制的現況與未來〉,《廣播與電視》,32, 109-139。 馮建三譯 (1992)。《統理BBC》。台北市: 遠流。原書Curran, C.(1979) A Seamless Robe. 翁秀琪 (2008)。〈公共媒體如何問責: 以台灣的公廣集團為例〉,《新聞學研究》,96, 187-211。 曹琬凌 (2006)。〈BBC未來十年圖像: 娛樂為要,三重監督〉上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自rnd.pts.org.tw/p2/2006/BBC%20future.pdf 曹琬凌、彭玉賢、林珍瑋 (2008)。〈公共廣電問責體系初探:以台灣公廣集團公共價值評量指標建構為例〉,《新聞學研究》,96, 129-186。 媒改社 (2009)。〈我們對於公共廣電的主張〉上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://www.twmedia.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=556 媒體改造學社、台灣媒體觀察教育基金會(2009)。〈籲公視新董事會與經理團隊 共同致力公廣集團之發展〉。上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://www.twmedia.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=583 薛曉源、陳家剛(2008)。《全球化與新制度主義》。臺北市: 五南。 魏玓 (2008)。〈公共廣電機構治理初探:原則、課題與機制〉,《廣播與電視》,29: 1-27。 魏玓、劉昌德譯 (2001)。《有權無責: 英國的報紙與媒體》。台北市: 鼎文。(原書 Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (1997). Power Without Responsibility: The Press and Broadcasting in Britain, 5th ed.) BBC英倫網(2013年10月15日)。〈薩維爾性侵醜聞特別報道專頁〉,上網日期:2015年6月1日,取自http://www.bbc.com/ukchina/trad/uk_life/2012/10/121031_savile_special_page Audience Council England (2009, February 03). Minutes of Conference Call held on 3 February, 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/ace/meetings/ace_minutes_030209.pdf Audience Council England (2009, May 12). Minutes of meeting held on 12 May 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/ace/meetings/ace_minutes_120509.pdf Audience Council England (2010, March 2). Minutes of meeting held on 2 March 2010. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/ace/meetings/ace_minutes_020310.pdf Audience Council England (2011, June 7). Boardroom, BBC Trust, Great Portland Street, London. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/ace/meetings/ace_minutes_070611.pdf Audience Council England (2013, January 15). Minutes of Audience Councils England Meeting. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/ace/meetings/ace_minutes_150113.pdf Audience Council England (2014, March 11). Minutes of Audience Councils England Meeting. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/ace/meetings/ace_minutes_110314.pdf Audience Council Northern Ireland. Why do people join our Audience Council? Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/who_we_are/audience_councils/northern_ireland/quotes Audience Council Wales (2011, November 10). Audience Engagement Event - Opinion formers from national organisations based across Wales. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/who_we_are/audience_councils/wales/your_voice/opinion_formers_2011 Audience Council of Wales (2011, December). Submission to BBC Trust consultation on the BBC's Delivering Quality First proposals. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/strategy/dqf_evidence.html Baldi, P., & Hasebrink, U.(Eds.). (2007). Broadcasters and Citizens in Europe: Trends in Media Accountability and Viewer Participation: Intellect Ltd Bardoel, J., & d'Haenens, L. (2004). Media responsibility and accountability: New conceptualizations and practices. Comunications:The European Journal of Communication Research, 29, 5-25. BBC Trust. (2012, May). Delivering Quality First: Final Conclusions. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/dqf/final_conclusions.pdf BBC Trust. (2014, April). BBC protocol D1 – Audience engagement: our promise to you. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/regulatory_framework/protocols/2014/d1_audience_engagement.pdf BBC Trust. (2014, April). BBC protocol F3 – Audience Council. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/regulatory_framework/protocols/2014/f3_audience_councils.pdf BBC Trust. (2015, February 26). Minutes of the BBC Trust Meeting. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/minutes/2015/26_feb.pdf Bertrand, C.J. (2000). Media Ethics & Accountability Systems. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Born, G. (2003). From Reithian Ethic to Managerial Discourse Accountability and Audit at the BBC. The Public, 10(3). Born, G. (2004). Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC. London: Secker & Warburg. Bovens, M. (2005). Public Accountability: A framework for the analysis and assessment of accountability arrangements in the public domain. EU: CONNEX. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.qub.ac.uk/polproj/reneg/contested_meanings/Bovens_Public%20Accountability.connex2.doc Broadcasting: An Agreement Between Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the British Broadcasting Corporation (2006, July). Buckley, S., Duer, K., Mendel, T., & Siochrú, S. O. (2011). Broadcasting, Voice, and Accountability: A Public Interest Approach to Policy, Law, and Regulation (4 ed.). Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. Collins, R., & Sujon, Z. (2007). UK Broadcasting Policy: The 'Long Wave' Shift in Conception of Accountability. In P. Baldi & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Broadcasters and Citizens in Europe: Trends in Media Accountability and Viewer Participation (pp. 33-52): Intellect Ltd. Commissioner for Public Appointments. (2012). Code of Practice for Ministerial Appointments to Public Bodies. London. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://publicappointmentscommissioner.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Code-of-Practice-2012.pdf Culture, Media and Sports Committee(2013, October 22). BBC Annual Report 2012-13: Oral and written evidence. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmcumeds/730-i/730i.pdf. Crisell,A.(2002). An Introductory History of British Broadcasting (2nd ed.). London: Rouledge. Department for Culture, M. a. S. (2005). A strong BBC, independent of government. Department for Culture, M. a. S. (2006). A public service for all:the BBC in the digital age. Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E., & Leppik-Bork, T. (Eds.). (2011). Mapping Media Accountability - in Europe and beyond: Herbert Von Halem Verlag Garside,J. & Martinson, J. (2015, March 9). Rona Fairhead should lose BBC job over HSBC role, says influential MP. The Guardian. Retrieved July 15, 2015, fromhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/mar/09/rona-fairhead-should-lose-bbc-job-over-hsbc-role-says-influential-mp Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Hargrave, A. M., & Shaw, C. (2009). Accountability and the Public Interest in Broadcasting: Palgrave Macmillan Holznagel, B., & Jungfleisch, C. (2007). The Protection of Viewer Right in Europe. In P. Baldi & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), (pp. 54-74). House of Lords (2007, July 25). The Chairmanship of the BBC: First Report. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldcomuni/171/17102.htm. House of Lords (2011, June 11). The Governance and Regulation of the BBC. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldcomuni/166/16607.htm#n219 House of Commons(2015, February 10). Future of the BBC. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmcumeds/315/31502.htm Jakubowicz, K. (2010). PSB 3.0: Reinventing European PSB. In P. Iosifidis (Ed.), Reinventing public service communication: European broadcasters and beyond: Palgrave Macmillan. Krogh, T. v. (2012). Understanding Media Accountability: Media Accountability in Relation to Media Criticismand and Media Governance in Sweden 1940-2010. (Doctoral thesis), Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall. Retrieved from http://miun.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:542409 Lamuedra, M., & Lara, T. (2008). The citizen in the BBC broadcast information. Comunicar(31), 145-152. doi: 10.3916/c31-2008-01-018 Levy, D. A. L. (1999). Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the EU and the Nation State. London and New York: Routledge. Lyons, M. (2008, January 17). Putting audiences at the heart of the PSB review. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/speeches/2008/ml_ippr McQuail, D. (1997). Accountability of Media to Society: Principles and Means. European Journal of Communication, 12, p.369-382. McQuail, D. (2003). Public Service Broadcasting : Both Free and Accountable. The Public, 10(3), 13-23. McQuail, D. (2005). McQuail's Mass Communication Theory(5 ed.): SAGE Publications. Mendel, T. (2011). Public Service Broadcasting: A Comparative Legal Survey. France: United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Peters, B. G. (2005). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism (2nd ed.): Bloomsbury Academic. Plunkett, J. (2015, March 26). BBC's Diane Coyle calls for an end to the top-slicing of the licence fee. The Guardian. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/mar/26/bbc-diana-coyle-licence-fee Public Accounts Committee (2012). The BBC's efficiency programme. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpubacc/527/52704.htm Public Knowledge (2012, May 9). Delivering Quality First: Analysis of Public Consultation--Final Report. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/dqf/final/final_consultation_summary.pdf Royal Charter(1996). Royal Charter(2006). Tunstall, J.(2010). The BBC and UK Public Service Broadcasting. In P. Iosifides (Ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication (pp. 145-157). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Voice of the Listener and Viewer(2011, December 21). Response to the BBC Trust Consultation. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/dqf/final/vlv.pdf Voice of the Listener & Viewer. VLV Membership. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://www.vlv.org.uk/support-vlv/vlv-membership.html Voice of the Listener & Viewer. VLV People. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://www.vlv.org.uk/vlv/vlv-people.html | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4580 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自1980年代以來,英國廣播協會(British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC)存在的正當性與必要性屢屢受到質疑,為了回應外界壓力,抗衡來自政府或市場的力量,BBC形成媒體問責制度,維持組織獨立精神,2007年的組織轉型更強化了向公民問責的特色。本研究嘗試探討:BBC發展媒體問責制度的歷史脈絡為何?轉型後的BBC理事會(Trust)又是如何透過媒體問責制度與公民互動?
本研究以歷史制度主義為視角,以文獻資料蒐集法為工具,將BBC發展媒體問責制度的過程鑲嵌於歷史脈絡中理解。其次,本研究觀察理事會與公民的互動過程,了解媒體問責制度的權力關係、公民行為與認知、公共利益等面向。 研究結果顯示,BBC從創立時就具備向全國民眾負責的概念,此概念成為發展媒體問責制度的基礎條件。自組織轉型之後,理事會與公民的互動形式分為四種類型:(1)針對整體閱聽人進行公眾意見調查、定期發布年度營運報告與理事會的會議記錄,意圖藉由組織公開透明,建立與公眾之間的信任關係。(2)定期召開閱聽人諮詢委員會,促使積極的公民參與問責體系,而該管道確實有助於達成審議式民主。(3)徵詢利益團體意見,傾聽長期觀察特定議題之公民團體對於BBC的策略建議。(4)接受國會質詢,理論上是更加有效的問責力量,然而實際執行時卻有政治干預之嫌。 最後,本研究認為BBC制度可為台灣公廣機構發展媒體問責制度提供以下參考:1.賦予法律強制力,明訂界定董事會與公民、或者其他利害關係人之間的問責角色、權利與義務。2.將問責概念落實於各個管理層級、事務評估標準、實際執行方法,避免問責過程與組織日常運作脫鉤。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines public accountability mechanisms in the British Broadcasting Corporation: how historical context influenced the mechanisms, and how the BBC Trust has interacted with citizens based on the Royal Charter since 2007.
To figure out those two questions, this study takes historical institutionalism approach to analyze data. The finding suggests that the BBC took different actions in an attempt to respond to the public's need for services and expectations about the BBC in different stages. Moreover, the BBC has interacted with citizens in different ways based approach to accountability since organizational transformation in 2007. First, for all licence fee payers, the BBC consults them by audience researches and regularly publishes information about how the BBC work. Second, for active citizen, the BBC selects representatives and regularly consults them in the audience council. The evidence shows that the council contributes to deliberative democracy. Third, for interest groups, the BBC consults them for specific issues to improve organizational strategy. Fourth, for another form of citizen representatives, the BBC accepts question in U.K. Parliament occasionally. Although Parliament may promote good governance, it may also trigger political interference in the governing process. Last but not least, results from this study also demonstrate some important concerns of public accountability mechanism for public broadcasting service in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:43:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R98342010-1.pdf: 3291180 bytes, checksum: 648d7f25704cf0e55b2a1855cb1ecf6e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………i
誌謝………………………………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………iv 第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題……………………………………………………3 第二章 文獻回顧與研究架構 …………………………………………4 第一節 媒體問責……………………………………………………4 第二節 研究途徑 …………………………………………………17 第三節 研究方法與章節安排 ……………………………………19 第三章 BBC發展問責制度的歷史脈絡 ………………………………21 第一節 探索問責的意義(1927~1979)…………………………21 第二節 回應組織外部利害關係人需求(1979~1990)……………22 第三節 改善組織內部問責體質(1992~2004)……………………24 第四節 問責制度成形(2004~2007)………………………………26 一、《皇家憲章》規範………………………………………27 二、理事遴選與成員背景 …………………………………32 三、理事會運作與財務基礎 ………………………………38 第四章 理事會向公民問責:過程與內容………………………………40 第一節 問責過程:以「品質第一」改革計畫為例……………42 一、整體閱聽人 ……………………………………………43 二、閱聽人諮詢委員會 ……………………………………49 三、利益團體 ………………………………………………58 四、國會質詢 ………………………………………………60 五、小結 ……………………………………………………62 第二節 問責內容:閱聽人諮詢委員會論述內容變化……………65 一、權力行使 ………………………………………………65 二、意見衝突 ………………………………………………67 三、議題變化 ………………………………………………68 第五章 結論與建議 ……………………………………………………73 第一節 研究發現 …………………………………………………73 第二節 研究討論 …………………………………………………78 一、探討問責制度文化脈絡的重要性………………………78 二、BBC案例對於台灣公共電視的啟示……………………80 第三節 研究展望與建議 …………………………………………83 參考書目…………………………………………………………………84 圖目錄 圖1:媒體自由、責任與問責的關係圖…………………………………6 圖2:BBC理事會遴選過程示意圖………………………………………34 圖3:公共價值檢測流程圖………………………………………………46 圖4:BBC理事會向公民問責的互動機制圖……………………………77 表目錄 表1:轉型前/後的《皇家憲章》規範董事會/理事會職權之比較………30 表2:2015年BBC理事會成員及其背景列表……………………………36 表3:理事會向公眾諮詢的問題列表……………………………………41 表4:「品質第一」改革草案之公眾意見調查內容 ……………………47 表5:閱聽人諮詢委員篩選標準…………………………………………50 表6:英格蘭地區閱聽人諮詢委員背景列表……………………………52 表7:閱聽人諮詢委員會討論議題類型編碼表…………………………68 表8:閱聽人諮詢委員會討論次數統計表………………………………69 表9:閱聽人諮詢委員會討論議題類型比例……………………………71 表10:BBC發展問責制度的歷史脈絡……………………………………75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公共廣電機構向公民問責的制度研究—以BBC為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Public Accountability in Public Service Broadcasting:the Case of BBC | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 程宗明(Chung-ming Cheng),魏玓(Ti Wei) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 英國廣播協會,媒體問責,利害關係人,歷史制度主義,審議式民主, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | British Broadcasting Corporation,media accountability,stakeholder,historical institutionalism,deliberative democracy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 94 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf | 3.21 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。