請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45783完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張重昭(Chung-Chau Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jia-Huei Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林佳慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:46:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-08-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ang, S.H., Leong, S.M. (1994).Comparative advertising: superiority despite interference? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 11, 33-46.
Baron R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Barone M. J. and Miniard P. W. (1999). How and when factual ad claims mislead consumers: examining the deceptive consequences of copy x copy interactions for partial comparative advertisings. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 58–74. Barone M. J., Palan K. M. and Miniard P. W. (2004). Brand usage and gender as moderators of the potential deception associated with partial comparative advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33 (1), pp. 19–28. Belch, G. E. (1981). An examination of comparative and noncomparative television commercials: The effects of claim variation and repetition on cognitive response and message acceptance. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 333-349. Chernev A.(2004). Goal–Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 141-150. Crowley, E.A. and Hoyer, D.W. (1994) An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-Sided Persuasion.The Journal of Consumer Research, 20,561-574 Droge, C. (1989).Shaping the route to attitude change: central versus peripheral processing through comparative versus noncomparative advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 193-204. Droge, C. and R. Y. Darmon (1987). Associative positioning strategies through comparative advertising: attribute versus overall similarity approaches. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (4), 377–388. Eisend M. (2006).Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis.International. Journal of Research in Marketing,23, 187-198 Etgar M. and Goodwin A. S. (1982).One-Sided Versus Two-Sided Comparative Message Appeals for New Brand Introductions. The Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 460-465 Earl, R.L., and Pride, W. M. (1980).The effects of advertising structure, message-sidedness and performance test results on print ad informativeness. Journal of Advertising, 9(3),36-46. Florack, A., Simon I, and Rahel B. (2009). The impact of regulatory focus on the effects of two-sided advertising. Social congnition,27,37-56 Golden, L. (1979).Consumer reactions to explicit brand comparisons in ads. Journal of Marketing Research, 16,517-32. Golden, L. L., and Alpert, M. I. (1987). Comparative analysis for the relative effectiveness of one-sided and two-sided communications for contrasting products. Journal of Advertising, 16, 18-28. Goodwin, S. and Etgar M. (1980). An experimental investigation of comparative advertising: impact of message appeal, information load, and utility of product class. Journal of Marketing Research,17 (2),187–202. Gorn, G.J., Weinberg, C. B. (1984).The impact of comparative advertising on perception and attitude: some positive findings. Journal of Consumer Research, 11,719-27. Grewal,D., Kavanoor,S., Fern, F.E., Costley, C. and Barnes, J.(1997)Comparative versus Noncomparative Advertising: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Marketing,61,1-15 Higgins, E. T. (1997). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology,30,1-46 Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-moderate effect creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177–191. Houston, D. A. and S. J. Sherman (1995). Cancellation and focus: the role of shared and unique features in the choice process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 357–378. Iyer, E.S. (1988).The influence of verbal content and relative newness on the effectiveness of comparative advertising. Journal of Advertising, 17 (3) ,15-21. Jain, P. S., Agrawal, N. & D. Maheswaran( 2006) When more may be less: the effects of regulatory focus on responses to different comparative Frames. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 91-98. Kamnis M. A., and Marks L. J. (1987). Advertising puffery: The impact of using two sided claims on product attitude and purchase intention. Journal of Advertising, 16, 6-15. Lockwood P., Jordan,H.C., and Kunda Z. (2002).Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864. Muehling, D., Stolman, J., and Grossbart, S. (1990).The impact of comparative advertising on levels of message involvement. Journal of Advertising, 19 (4), 41-50. Murphy, J., and Amundsen, M. (1981).The communications-effectiveness of comparative advertising for a new brand on users of the dominant brand. Journal of Advertising, 10(1) 14-20. Pechmann C. (1992).Predicting When Two-Sided Ads Will Be More Effective than One-Sided Ads: The Role of Correlational and Correspondent Inferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 441-453 Pechmann, C. and Stewart D. (1990).The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 180–191. Pinkleton, B. (1997).The effects of negative comparative political advertising on candidate evaluations and advertising evaluations: an exploration. Journal of Advertising, 26 , 19-29. Settle, R. B., and Golden, L. L. (1974). Attribution theory and advertiser credibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 181-185. Shimp T. A., and Dyer D. C. (1978).The effects of comparative advertising mediated by market position of sponsoring brand. Journal of Advertising, 7 ,13-19. Smith, R. E., and Hunt, S. D. (1978). Attributional processes and effects in promotional situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 149-158. Smith, R.E., and Swinyard, W. (1982). Information response models: an integrated approach. Journal of Marketing, 46 ,81-93. Sternthal, B., Phillips, L. W., and Dholakia, R.(1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: A situational analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 285-314. Stutts M.A. (1982).Comparative advertising and counterargument', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,10 (3), 302-13. Swinyard R.W. (1981).The Interaction between Comparative Advertising and Copy Claim Variation. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 175-186 Tashchian, R.O., and Slama, M.E. (1984).Involvement and the effectiveness of comparative advertising. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 7(1), 79-92. Teng, C-I., Chung, C-C. and Lai, J-Y. (2009). Partial comparative messages in comprtition. British Journal of Management, 20, 158-171 Wan, E-W., Hong, J. and Sternthal, B. (2008).The Effect of Regulatory Orientation and Decision Strategy on Brand Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 1026-1038. Wang, J., and Lee, A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 28-38. Wilson, R.D. (1976). An empirical evaluation of comparative advertising messages: subjects’ responses on perceptual dimensions. Advances in Consumer Research, Proceedings of Association for Consumers Research, 3 ,53-74. Zhou, P. and Pham T. M. (2004) Promotion and Prevention across Mental Accounts: When Financial Products Dictate Consumers’ Investment Goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 125-135. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45783 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Florack et al.(2009)研究指出，在非比較廣告中，單雙向訴求廣告之品牌態度受到調節焦點的影響。由於雙向訴求有效提高廣告的可信度，對品牌態度產生正向效果，但雙向訴求同時也揭露品牌的缺點，使品牌態度產生負向效果，根據不同調節焦點，促進型焦點消費者行為策略傾向追求正向結果，對於負向結果較不敏感，因此在閱讀雙向訴求廣告時，可信度對於品牌態度的正向效果會大於品牌缺點的負向效果；但預防型焦點消費者的行為策略傾向避免負向結果，因此對於雙向訴求中的負向缺點較為敏感，導致預防型焦點消費者降低雙向訴求的品牌態度。
本研究延伸探討比較廣告中—包含完全比較廣告與部份比較廣告，單雙向訴求廣告之品牌態度是否仍受到調節焦點的影響。由於比較廣告使用比較性訴求，雖然有助於消費者提高對屬性的注意和回憶，但卻可能降低可信度且產生較多的反駁觀點和負向認知，推論在比較廣告下，調節焦點對單雙向訴求之調節效果會隨之降低。本研究採用3 ( 完全比較廣告 / 部份比較廣告 / 非比較廣告) x 2(單向 / 雙向訴求)x 2(促進型 / 預防型焦點)實驗設計，利用GRFM量表衡量在不同調節焦點人格下，是否在不同廣告類型中，單雙向訊息中都具有調節作用。結果發現：(1) 完全比較廣告與部份比較廣告之品牌態度顯著優於非比較廣告。(2) 部份比較廣告或非比較廣告，雙向訴求廣告之品牌態度顯著受到不同調節焦點的影響，單雙向訴求對於品牌態度並不會有顯著的差異，但促進型焦點消費者對於雙向訴求有較好的品牌態度，預防型焦點消費者對於單向訴求較好的品牌態度，但在完全比較廣告下，調節焦點並沒有顯著的調節作用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Florack et al. (2009) demonstrated regulatory focus moderated two-sided claims on product evaluation in noncomparative advertising. The regulatory focus theory defined two kinds of individuals in promotion focus and prevention focus. Promotion-focused individuals are sensitive to the presence or absence of positive outcome, while prevention-focused individuals are sensitive to the presence or absence of negative outcome. Since two-sided claims enhance ad credibility but also disclose negative product information, the result supported that promotion-focused individuals would have better product evaluation through two-sided claims than prevention-focused individuals in noncomparative advertising.
This study further focus on how the regulatory focus moderates two-sided claims on brand attitude of comparative advertising. Comparative claims in comparative advertising might decrease ad credibility and increase more counterarguments and negative cognition, the moderate effect of regulatory focus might be efficient less. This study apply a 3 (Complete comparative / Partial comparative / Noncomparative) x 2(One-/Two-sided claims) x 2(Promotion / Prevention) design and use GRFM scale to measure chronic regulatory focus of participants. 377 participants showed that (1) brands promoted by complete comparative and partial comparative advertising would have better brand attitude than noncomparative advertising. (2) Regulatory focus moderates two-sided claims on product evaluation in partial comparative ads and noncomparative ads, but not in complete comparative ads. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:46:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97741030-1.pdf: 426205 bytes, checksum: 8e8cc63ca0ed3faf4da9b1c3e284154f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii Content iii Table content iv Figure content v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature and hypothesis development 3 3.1 Regulatory focus 3 3.2 Noncomparative advertisings (NC) 5 3.3 Complete comparative advertisings (CC) 7 3.4 Partial comparative advertisings (PC) 9 Chapter 3 Mythology 10 3.1 Sample collection 10 3.2 Pretest 11 3.3 Study design 13 3.4 Analysis method 16 Chapter 4 Result 17 4.1 Overview of Ad type effect. 17 4.2 Result of NC 22 4.3 Result of CC 28 4.4 Result of PC 34 4.5 Hypotheses summary and Discussion 40 Chapter 5 Conclusion and limitation 43 5.1 Conclusion and contribution 43 5.2 Research limitation 44 Reference 45 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 完全比較廣告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 部份比較廣告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非比較廣告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙向訴求 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 調節焦點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | promotion-focus and prevention-focus | en |
| dc.subject | Comparative advertising | en |
| dc.subject | partial comparative advertising | en |
| dc.subject | noncomparative advertising | en |
| dc.subject | two-sided advertising | en |
| dc.subject | regulatory focus | en |
| dc.title | 調節焦點對於雙向比較廣告效果之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Effectiveness of Two-sided Comparative Advertising | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭士蘋(SHIH-PING JENG),廖本哲 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 完全比較廣告,部份比較廣告,非比較廣告,雙向訴求,調節焦點, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Comparative advertising,partial comparative advertising,noncomparative advertising,two-sided advertising,regulatory focus,promotion-focus and prevention-focus, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 48 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 416.22 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。