Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45782
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳右人(Iou-Zen Chen)
dc.contributor.authorPeng-Han Leeen
dc.contributor.author李芃函zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T04:46:03Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-09
dc.date.copyright2010-08-09
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-08-05
dc.identifier.citation小西國義、今西英雄、五川正憲. 1992. 菊. p. 36-50. 刊於:李叡明譯. 花卉花期控制. 淑馨出版社. 台北.
行政院農業委員會. 2010. 農業統計要覽. <http://stat.coa.gov.tw/dba_as/As_root.htm>
交通部中央氣象局天文站. 2010. 天文日曆. 交通部中央氣象局. 台北.
李心瑩. 1998. 利用低溫處理改變豐香品種草苺的生長發育期. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 台北.
李哖. 1992. 台灣菊花和唐菖蒲切花產銷模式之規劃(上). 中國園藝 38:101-116.
李窓明. 1994a. 草苺本圃管理要點. 桃園區農業專訊 9:25-28.
李窓明. 1994b. 草苺育苗管理. 桃園區農業專訊 8:15-17.
李窓明. 1994c. 草苺栽培及病蟲害防治曆. 桃園區農業專訊 7:14-15.
李窓明、李聯興. 1999. 草苺桃園三號之育成. 桃園區農業改良場研究彙報 39:1-17.
李窓明. 1993. 台灣草苺產業演進四十年. p.315-328. 刊於:杜金池等編著. 台灣蔬菜產業演進四十年專集. 台灣省農業試驗所編印. 臺中霧峰.
郭懷恩. 2009. 草苺育苗母株培育期與方法對種苗增殖倍率的影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 台北.
許謙信、魏芳明、田雲生、陳彥睿. 2002. 菊花電照省電方式之研究:省電燈泡與間歇照明. 臺中區農業改良場研究彙報 76:43-53.
許謙信、洪慧娟. 2004. 利用省電燈泡與間歇照明節省菊花電照成本. 中國園藝 50:209-218.
許謙信、饒瑞佶、方煒. 2004. 菊花電照省電方式之研究:不同光質省電燈泡電照抑制開花作用. 臺中區農業改良場研究彙報 85:1-12.
國立臺灣大學大氣科學系測計研究室. 2010. 國立台灣大學 大氣科學系 測計實驗室 觀測坪資料查詢. <http://realtime.cook-team.org/query/index.php>
溫淑玲. 1984. 溫度對春香草苺生長發育之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 台北.
羅秋雄. 2005. 草苺. 作物施肥手冊. p.137. 中華肥料協會. 台中.
譚婉兒. 1984. 氮肥與激勃素(Gibberellic Acid)對草苺生長之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 台北.
Cockshull, G.E. 1990. 菊花. p. 269-289. 刊於:林慧玲譯. 設施花卉開花調節技術. 臺灣省台南區農業改良場. 台南.
伏原肇. 1997. とよのかの生理・生態と栽培技術. p. 319-354. 農業技術大系野菜編3(イチゴ), 農山漁村文化協会, 東京.
香川彰. 1971. イチゴ栽培の理論と実際. 誠文堂新光社, 東京.
独立行政法人農畜産業振興機構. 2010. 野菜図鑑「いちご」. <http://vegetable.alic.go.jp/panfu/berry/berry.htm>
独立行政法人 農業.食品産業技術総合研究機構 九州沖縄農業研究センター. 2010. 独立行政法人農業.生物系特定産業技術研究機構.九州沖縄農業研究センター 久留米園芸研究拠点. <http://www.knaes.affrc.go.jp/veg/index.html>
高橋和彥. 1978. 生育のステージと生理、生態. p. 49-136. イチゴ─基礎生理と応用技術, 農山漁村文化協会, 東京.
森下昌三、山川理. 1991. 一季成り性イチゴの短日低温処理に対する感受性の品種間差異. 園学雑. 60:539-546.
農林水産省 生産局 知的財産課. 2010. 品種登録ホームページ. <http://www.hinsyu.maff.go.jp/>
荻原貞夫. 1970. イチゴ作型とつくり方. 農山漁村文化協会, 東京.
Ahmadi, H., R.S. Bringhurst, and V. Voth. 1990. Modes of inheritance of photoperiodism in Fragaria. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115:146-152.
Aspuria, J.R. and Y. Fujime. 1995. Eco-physiological studies in the analysis of dormancy in strawberry. Acta Hort. 395:97-104.
Battey, N.H., P. Le Mi&egrave;re, A. Tehranifer, C. Cekic, S. Taylor, K.J. Shrives, P. Hadley, A.J. Greenland, J. Darby, and M.J. Wilkinson. 1998. Genetic and environmental control of flowering in strawberry. p. 111-131. In: Cockshull K.E., D. Gray, G. B. Seymour, and B. Thomas (eds.) Genetic and Environmental Manipulation of Horticultural Crops, CAB Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
Bigey, J. 2002. Chilling requirements and compensation for the lack of chilling in strawberry. Acta Hort. 567:269-272.
Borthwick, H.A. and H.M. Cathey. 1962. Role of phytochrome in control of flowering of chrysanthemum. Bot. Gaz. 123: 155-162.
Brutnell, T. 2006. Phytochrome and light control of plant development. p. 417-443. In: Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. Plant Physiology. 4th ed. Sinauer associates, Inc., U.S.A.
Cathey, H.M. and H.A. Borthwick. 1957. Photoreversibility of floral initiation in chrysanthemum. Bot. Gaz. 119:71-76.
Cathey, H.M. and H.A. Borthwick. 1964. Significance of dark reversion of phytochrome in flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Bot. Gaz. 125:232-236.
Cathey, H.M. and H.A. Borthwick. 1970. Photoreactions controlling flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium (Ramat. and Hemfi.) illuminated with fluorescent lamps. Plant Physiol. 45:235-239.
Colasanti, J. and V. Sundaresan. 2000. ‘Florigen’ enters the molecular age: long-distance signals that cause plants to flower. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:236-240.
Corbesier, L. and G. Coupland. 2006. The quest for florigen: a review of recent progress. J. Exp. Bot. 57:3395-3403.
Darnell, R.L. and G.W. Stutte. 2001. Nitrate concentration effects on NO3-N uptake and reduction, growth, and fruit yield in strawberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125:560-563.
Durner, E.F. and E.B. Poling. 1985. Comparison of three methods for determining the floral or vegetative status of strawberry plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:808-811.
Durner, E.F., J.A. Barden, D.G. Himelrik, and E.B. Poling. 1984. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, junebearing, and everbearing strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:396-400.
Hancock, J.F. 1999. Strawberries. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
Hancock, J.F., P.W. Callow, S. Ser&ccedil;e, and P.Q. Son. 2003. Variation in the horticultural characteristics of native Fragaria virginiana and F. chiloensis from north and south America. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:201-208.
Hancock, J.F., C.A. Finn, S.C. Hokanson, J.J. Luby, B.L. Goulart, K. Demchak, P.W. Callow, S. Ser&ccedil;e, A.M.C. Schilder, and K.E. Hummer. 2001. A multistate comparison of native octoploid strawberries from north and south America. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:579-586.
Hartmann, H.T. 1947. Some effects of temperature and photoperiod on flower formation and runner production in the strawberry. Plant Physiol. 22:407-420.
Heide, O.M. and A. S&oslash;nsteby. 2007. Interactions of temperature and photoperiod in the control of flowering of latitudinal and altitudinal populations of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Physiol. Plant. 130:280-289.
Imaizumi, T. and A.K. Steve. 2006. Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 550–558.
Ito, H. and T. Saito. 1962. Studies on the flower formation in the strawberry plants. I. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the flower formation. Tohoku J. Agric. Res. 13:191-203.
Izhar, S. 1997. Infra short-day strawberry types. Acta Hort. 439:155-160.
Jahn, O.L. and M.N. Dana. 1970. Crown and inflorescence development in the strawberry, Fragaria ananassa. Amer. J. Bot. 57:605-612.
Konsin, M., I. Voipio, and P. Palonen. 2001. Influence of photoperiod and duration of short-day treatment on vegetative growth and flowering of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 76:77-82.
Ledesma, N.A., M. Nakata, and N. Sugiyama. 2008. Effect of high temperature stress on the reproductive growth of strawberry cvs. 'Nyoho' and 'Toyonoka'. Scientia Hort. 116:186-193.
Lieten, F. 1997. Effects of chilling and night-break treatment on greenhouse production of ‘Elsanta’. Acta Hort. 439:633-640.
Lieten, P. 2006. Chilling unit model for greenhouse production of strawberry cv. ‘Elsanta’. Acta Hort. 708:381-388.
Manakasem, Y. and P.B. Goodwin. 1998. Using the floral status of strawberry plants, as determined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy, to survey the phenology of commercial crops. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123:513-517.
Manakasem, Y. and P.B. Goodwin. 2001. Responses of dayneutral and Junebearing strawberries to temperature and daylength. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 76:629-635.
Mochizuki, T., M. Okimura, H. Takahashi, Y. Yoshida, N. Sugiyama, A. Yamasaki. 2006. Recent trends on strawberry cultivars and production technology in Japan. Acta Hort. 761:107-114.
Nicoll, M.F. and G.J. Galletta. 1987. Variation in growth and flowering habits of junebearing and everbearing strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112:872-880.
Nishiyama, M. and K. Kanahama. 2002. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flower bud initiation of day-neutral and everbearing strawberries. Acta Hort. 567:253-255.
Nishiyama, M., K. Kanahama, and Y. Ebihara. 2007. Varietal differences in critical photoperiod for inflorescence production among day-neutral strawberry cultivars. Acta Hort. 761:207-214.
Nishizawa, T. and Y. Shishido. 1998. Changes in sugar and starch concentrations of forced June-bearing strawberry plants as influenced by fruiting. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123:52-55.
Notaguchi, M., M. Abe, T. Kimura, Y. Daimon, T. Kobayashi, A. Yamaguchi, Y. Tomita, K. Dohi, M. Mori, and T. Araki. 2008. Long-distance, graft-transmissible action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T protein to promote flowering. Plant Cell Physiol. 49:1645-1658.
Okimura, M. and I. Igarashi. 1997. Effects of photoperoid and temperature on flowering in everbearing strawberry seedling. Acta Hort. 439:605-608.
P&eacute;rez de Camacaro, M.E., G.J. Camacaro, P. Hadley, N.H. Battey, and J.G. Carew. 2002. Pattern of growth and development of the strawberry cultivars Elsanta, Bolero, and Everest. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127:901-907.
Ser&ccedil;e, S. and J.F. Hancock. 2005a. Inheritance of day-neutrality in octoploid species of Fragaria. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130:580-584.
Ser&ccedil;e, S. and J.F. Hancock. 2005b. The temperature and photoperiod regulation of flowering and runnering in the strawberries, Fragaria chiloensis, F. virginiana, and F. × ananassa. Scientia Hort. 103:167-177.
Shaw, D.V. 2003. Heterogeneity of segregation ratios from selfed progenies demonstrate polygenic inheritance for day neutrality in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:504-507.
Shaw, D.V. and K.D. Larson. 2005. Genetic variation and response to selection for early season fruit production in California strawberry seedling (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) populations. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130:41-45.
S&oslash;nsteby, A. 1997. Short-day period and temperature interactions on growth and flowering of strawberry. Acta Hort. 439:609-616.
S&oslash;nsteby, A. and A. Nes. 1998. Short days and temperature effects on growth and flowering in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 73:730-736.
S&oslash;nsteby, A. and O.M. Heide. 2006. Dormancy relations and flowering of the strawberry cultivars ‘Korona’ and ‘Elsanta’ as influenced by photoperiod and temperature. Scientia Hort. 110:57-67.
S&oslash;nsteby, A. and O.M. Heide. 2007a. Long-day control of flowering in everbearing strawberries. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 82:266-274.
S&oslash;nsteby, A. and O.M. Heide. 2007b. Quantitative long-day flowering response in the perpetual-flowering F1 strawberry cultivar Elan. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 82:266-274.
Strik, B., T. Righetti, and G. Buller. 2004. Influence of rate, timing, and method of nitrogen fertilizer application on uptake and use of fertilizer nitrogen, growth, and yield of June-bearing strawberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:165-174.
Takeda, F., D.M. Glenn, and G.W. Stutte. 2008. Red light affects flowering under long days in a short-day strawberry cultivar. HortScience 43:2245-2247.
Taylor, D.R. 2002. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Acta Hort. 567:245-251.
Taylor, D.R., M.F. Wickenden, C.M. Crisp, and P.T. Atkey. 1997a. The use of cryo-scanning electron microscopy to study flower initiation and development in strawberry. Acta Hort. 439:641-643.
Taylor, D.R., P.T. Atkey, M.F. Wickenden, and C.M. Crisp. 1997b. A morphological study of flower initiation and development in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa) using cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Ann. Appl. Biol. 130:141-152.
Vinee-Prue, D. and C.G. Guttridge. 1973. Floral initiation in strawberry: spectral evidence for the regulation of flowering by long-day inhibition. Planta 110:165-172.
Yanagi, T. and Y. Oda. 1993. Effect of photoperiod and chilling on floral formation of intermediate types between June- and everbearing strawberries. Acta Hort. 348:339-346.
Yanagi, T., N. Okuda, and T. Takamura. 2005. Introgression of unique characteristics of floral initiation under 24 hour day-length of Fragaria chiloensis ‘CHI-24-1’ into F. × ananassa. Euphytica 144: 79-84.
Yanagi, T., T. Yachi, and N. Okuda. 2006. Photoperiodic reaction of sexual and asexual reproduction in Fragaria chiloensis L. CHI-24-1 plants grown at various temperatures. Scientia Hort. 110:187-191.
Zeevaart, J.A. 2006. Florigen coming of age after 70 years. Plant Cell 18:1783-1789.
Zeevaart, J.A. 2008. Leaf-produced floral signals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11:541-547.
Zhang, X., D.G. Himelrick, F.M. Woods, and R.C. Ebel. 2000. Effect of temperature, photoperiod and pretreatment growing condition on floral induction in springbearing strawberry. Small Fruits Rev. 1:113-123.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45782-
dc.description.abstract臺灣主要栽培草苺品種為‘桃園一號’和‘桃園三號’。‘桃園一號’(‘豐香’)是日本引進之品種,已累積相當多的研究資料,但針對臺灣育成之‘桃園三號’草苺的開花研究則相當少。因此本試驗藉由溫度對光週期之組合,歸納適宜及抑制‘桃園三號’草苺開花之環境條件,希望藉此檢討現今的栽培曆,以期達到有經濟效益的產期調節方法。
溫度試驗中,‘桃園三號’草苺在13.5小時的日長下,配合25/20℃,即能產生花芽並抽出,符合超短日型(ISD)草苺之條件,日長與涼溫需求不甚嚴苛。25/20℃處理者可於生長箱處理期間始花,早於20/15℃、15/10℃處理者。顯示,植株營養生長狀態,與花序抽出的能力相關。20/15℃、15/10℃處理者,植株逐漸進入休眠,葉面積變小、葉柄變短,植株呈簇生狀,根系雖然在涼溫生長相對旺盛,但地上部植株生長活力大幅下降,且15/10℃處理者葉片數顯著較少,因此花序遲遲無法抽出。2009年的試驗,處理後的田間表現,由整體累積花序數量觀之,20/15℃、15/10℃處理者的花序數量,最後仍不及25/20℃處理,尤其15/10℃處理者的表現,比戶外對照組還差。因此,未必是溫度越低,促進花芽分化的效果越好。
增加光照的各項處理,無論是延長日長,或是利用暗中斷的方法,均可促使已形成花序抽出且齊一、走莖萌發、葉柄增長、葉面積增加等。田間以白熾鎢絲燈為主的暗中斷處理,可有效抑制植株後續花芽分化,植株可於暗中斷處理後的2個月左右抽出花序。但生長箱中以日光燈進行暗中斷處理,則未能達到抑制花芽的效果,因此必須考量燈具的類型,所提供的光源波長、照度、頻度等細節條件,以及處理的時間點,與處理時間長度等。日長處理部份,20/15℃下,16小時之日長,無法完全阻止花芽形成,顯示臨界短日會隨溫度而改變。
綜合溫度與光週期試驗結果,藉由增加光照的方式,可提早育苗時間、提昇苗的品質。再給予低溫短日 (20/15℃,短於13.5小時即可) 處理,便可提早草苺產期。若要延後產期,可仰賴低溫處理迫使植株休眠,或是光照抑制的方式進行,依照實際情況,考量處理成本進行搭配,未來臺灣的草苺產期,絕對不僅僅侷限於11月至4月之間。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractFragaria ×ananassa Duch. cv. ‘Taoyuan No. 1’and F. ×ananassa Duch. cv. ‘Taoyuan No. 3’are the main strawberry cultivar planted in Taiwan. ‘Taoyuan No. 1’ (‘Toyonoka’) was introduced from Japan, which had been accumulated a lot of studies. However, as the first cultivar that had been bred in Taiwan, there is not much information about flowering of ‘Taoyuan No. 3’. Therefore, by treating different temperature and photoperiod combinations, this study aims to figure out suitable and unsuitable conditions on floral bud formation of ‘Taoyuan No. 3’. We want to review current cultivation pattern, and discuss economical ways to adjust the harvest.
In the temperature experiments, ‘Taoyuan No. 3 was able to form and sprout floral bud under 13.5-hour-daylength with 25/20℃. This behavior is meet to the term of infra short-day strawberry. Excessively strict daylength and cool temperature are not necessary for floral bud formation. 25/20℃ treatment sprouts the inflorescences in growth chamber earlier than 20/15℃ and 15/10℃. It shows that vegetative growth state affects the ability to sprout inflorescences. Since the plants gradually went into dormancy under 20/15℃ and 15/10℃, with smaller leaf area, shorter petiole, and clustered appearance. Although root growth was relatively better in the cooler temperature, but shoot growth activity was greatly reduced, especially 15/10℃ treatment had significantly less number of leaves, leading to postpone the sprouting of inflorescences. After the treatment, eventually the total inflorescence number of 20/15℃ and 15/10℃ were not as much as 25/20℃. Even the total inflorescence number of 15/10℃ was less than the outdoor control. Therefore, it is not lower the temperature, the better to promote flower bud formation.
The treatment of increase the illumination, whether to prolong the daylength, or use night break methods, was able to promote the existing inflorescence sprout uniformly, as well as the germination of runners, the prolongation of petiole, and the extension of leaf area. Using incandescent filaments as major light source of night break, it was able to inhibit the later floral bud differentiation efficiently in the field. After the night break, plants could sprout the inflorescences about 2 months later. Thus we must consider the form of light source that involving the details about wavelength, light intensity, frequency etc., and treat processing timing with an appropriate length. In addition, the treatment of daylength, the floral bud formation could not be suppressed completely under 20/15℃ with the 16-hour-daylength. It indicates the critical short day of ‘Taoyuan No. 3’ will change with temperature.
Integrating the results of temperature and photoperiod treatments, we can propagate strawberry runner plants earlier by increasing light. The earlier we propagate the easier to improve the quality of runner plants. And then we could harvest strawberries earlier by low temperature and short day treatments (about 20/15℃, less than 13.5-hour was recommended). Also, the strawberries could be forced go into dormancy by low temperature, or inhibited the floral buds by increasing light. Considering the actual situation with the cost, it would be advantageous to delay the harvest by these ways. In the future, the harvest season of strawberry would not be definitely limited form November to April in Taiwan.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:46:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R97628101-1.pdf: 1853027 bytes, checksum: 684fa3a386db52e970f4a4fc6e7cbd3f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 前言 1
第二章 前人研究 3
第一節 草苺的花器 3
第二節 草苺開花型態分類 3
第三節 影響草苺開花的因子 6
第四節 ‘桃園一號’與‘桃園三號’草苺 9
第五節 夜間照光處理對短日型植物的影響—以菊花為例 11
第三章 材料與方法 15
第一節 材料預備與管理 15
第二節 試驗設備與設施 16
第三節 試驗設計與調查項目 16
第四節 試驗結果分析方法 20
第五節 溫度與日長資料來源與計算 20
第四章 結果與討論 22
第一節 溫度試驗 22
第二節 光週期試驗 27
第五章 結論 36
參考文獻 103
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject花芽zh_TW
dc.subject草苺zh_TW
dc.subject溫度zh_TW
dc.subject光週期zh_TW
dc.subjectphotoperioden
dc.subjectstrawberryen
dc.subjectfloral buden
dc.subjecttemperatureen
dc.title溫度與光週期對‘桃園三號’草苺花芽形成之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffects of temperature and photoperiod on floral bud formation of Fragaria ×ananassa Duch. ‘Taoyuan No. 3’en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭正勇,李金龍,阮素芬
dc.subject.keyword草苺,溫度,光週期,花芽,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordstrawberry,temperature,photoperiod,floral bud,en
dc.relation.page109
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-08-06
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.81 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved