請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45744
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周家蓓(Chia-Pei Chou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Li-Wei Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張力維 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:45:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-09 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] M. Swanlund. Enhancing Pavement Smoothness. Public Roads, FHWA, 2000.
[2] T.D. Gillespie, M.W. Sayers, L. Segel. NCHRP Report No. 228: Calibration of Response-Type Road Roughness Measuring Systems. TRB, Washington D.C., Dec. 1980. [3] T.D. Gillespie. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about the IRI But Were Afraid to Ask. Road Profile Users Group Meeting. September 22-24. 1992. [4] R.O. Souza, S.D. Neto, M.M. Farias. Statistical Analysis between Roughness Indices and Roughness Prediction Model Using Neural Networks. In Paper from International Contest on Long-Term Pavement Performance Data Analysis, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2006. [5] Manual for Pavement Performance Evaluation, Japan Road Association, Tokyo, 2006, pp. 42-49. [6] Y.H. Huang. Pavement Analysis and Design 2nd edition. Pearson Education, Inc., 2004. [7] M.W. Sayers, T.D. Gillespie, and C. Queiroz. International Experiment to Establish Correlations and Standard Calibration Methods for Road Roughness Measurements. World Bank Technical Paper Number 45, World Bank., Washington, D.C., 1986. [8] M.W. Sayers. Two Quarter-Car Models for Defining Road Roughness: IRI and HRI. Transportation Research Record 1215, TRB, Washington, D.C., 1990. [9] J.S. Chen, C.C. Huang. Development of Pavement Smoothness Index Relationship. Journal of ASTM International, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, 2006, Vol. 3, No. 8. [10] K.T. Hall, C.E.C. Munoz. Estimation of Present Serviceability Index from International Roughness Index. Transportation Research Record 1655, TRB, Washington, D.C., 1999. [11] W.D.O. Paterson. Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1987. [12] B. Al-Omari, M.I. Darter. Relationships Between International Roughness Index and Present Serviceability Rating. Transportation Research Record 1435, TRB, Washington, D.C., 1994. [13] C.P. Chou. City Road Pavement Distress Detection System and Revision of the Pavement Smoothness Specification, Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, 2009. [14] Technical Specifications for Construction of Asphalt Pavement, Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, 2005. [15] Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works, Volume 1 Specification For Highway Works. Department for Transport, U.K., 2007. [16] Part 235 Surface Characteristics – Roughness. Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure, South Australia, 2007. [17] Long-Term Pavement Performance Products Online database. (Available from: http://www.ltpp-products.com/index.asp) [18] A virtual engineering/science laboratory course, Probability Distributions. (Available from: http://www.jhu.edu/virtlab/virtlab.html.) [19] Mechanical Vibration and Shock - Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration, Part 1: General requirements, ISO 2631-1, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1997. [20] C.P. Chou. Developing of Pavement Performance Measurement Equipment Program. Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, 2005. [21] M.W. Sayers, S.M. Karamihas, The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information about Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1998. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45744 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究將首先探討三米直規與國際糙度指標 (International Roughness Index, IRI) 兩者間之差異性與相關性,藉以提出適合之轉換方式,再者,將以使用者的舒適度做為前提,探討各種鋪面平坦度指標與使用者感受之關聯,最後以彙整三米直規之各種限制與其使用上之缺點。透過於剖面資料,針對資料之分佈情形進行檢定發現三米直規標準差以及IRI兩種指標之分佈情形皆符合對數常態分布,並利用取完對數後之數據進行迴歸,並回推為一乘冪式之迴歸式,其相關係數R2值高達0.9368,並以國內資料加以驗證,皆符合Gauss-Markov定理下之殘差期望值為零以及變異數齊一性之性質。本研究利用路面品質績效量測系統 (Pavement Quality Measurement System, PQMS),於桃園國際機場由南側跑道進行試驗,由PQMS輸出鋪面行駛品質指標 (Pavement Riding Quality Index, PRQI),與各種平坦度指標進行關聯性分析,發現與單一輪軌跡之IRI直接無明顯關聯性,進而以雙剖面所產生之指標包括二分車糙度指標 (Half-Car Roughness Index, HRI) 以及平均糙度指標 (Mean Roughness Index, MRI)進行關聯性分析,兩者之相關係數R2值皆較採用單一剖面之指標來的高,而其中HRI高達0.85,雙剖面之指標較能有效反應使用者之實際感受,而其中以HRI之表現最佳。三米直規標準差計算方式方面,平均全距法之整體的平均值以及通過率過度高估鋪面平坦度。波長反應圖利用正弦波模擬進行,但由於1.5m之檢測間距過大,因此採用之間距為0.25m提出波長反應圖,反應主要集中於短波長,且檢測起迄點在1.5m檢測間距下也有明顯之影響。透過通過率了解現行規範之評估水準,在現行規範下兩者並無相同之評估水準,透過迴歸式進行門檻值之轉換後,新的門檻值則能夠使的兩者之通過率幾乎完全相同。最後本研究也進一步對於三米直規之使用上之限制進行彙整,建議三米直規較適合用於局部不平坦之量測,例如人手孔蓋、路肩、橋面版等局部區域。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study discusses the difference and relation between 3-M Standard Deviator and International Roughness Index (IRI), and it also provide a suitable conversion method. And the second part discussed the relationship between user experience and roughness indices as a prerequisite for the users comfort. Then, the final part discuses provide a limitation and characteristics of 3-M Straightedge.
The distribution of IRI and 3-M Standard Deviator data are both fit with lognormal distribution, and the regression model is a power function with 0.9368 R2 value. The verification process with the data collected in Taiwan, and it also fit the Gauss-Markov Theorem. A Pavement Quality Measurement System (PQMS) was using in this study to out the Pavement Riding Quality Index (PRQI), and the test was proceeded in Taoyuan International Airport South Runway. The single-wheeltrack index has low correlation with PRQI, but Half-Car Roughness Index (HRI) and Mean Roughness Index (MRI) has higher R2 values, and the R2 value is 0.85 for HRI, which can represent the user feeling at most. In calculation of 3-M Standard Deviator, the mean value and passing rate of Average-Range Method overestimates the smoothness situation. The wavelength response is performed by the sinusoid profile simulation, due to the sampling interval of 1.5m is too large, this study performed the wavelength response by 0.25 sampling interval. It is sensitivity in the low end, and the starting point had a significant influence. And the present specification thresholds do not performed IRI-based and 3-M Standard Deviator-based in same level. Converting the thresholds by using the conversion equation, the new thresholds make the passing are nearly equivalent in both specifications. The limitation are compiled in the last paragraph, it is recommended that use the 3-M Straightedge for manhole, bridge, shoulder, and other local roughness. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:45:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97521515-1.pdf: 3865468 bytes, checksum: 865905ad5b1d120f11499a7843f391d3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 1.3 Dissertation Organization 4 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Smoothness Indices 5 2.2 Indices Relationship and Conversion 14 2.3 Existing Roadway Smoothness Specification 18 CHAPTER THREE RELATIONSHIT BETWEEN ROUGHNESS INDICES 29 3.1 Data Selection 29 3.2 Development of Regression Model 32 3.3Model Verification 37 CHAPTER FOUR USER EXPERIENCE AND ROUGHNESS INDICES 39 4.1 ISO 2631-1 40 4.2 Pavement Quality Measurement System 45 4.3 Measurement Project and Result 48 4.4 Discussion of User Experiences and Roughness Indices 50 CHAPTER FIVE APPLICABILITY OF 3-M STRAIGHEDGE 55 5.1 Calculation of 3-M Straightedge Standard Deviator 55 5.2 Wavelength Response of 3-M Standard Deviator 57 5.3 Existing Specification Comparison 62 5.4 Limitation of 3-M Straightedge and 3-M Standard Deviator 66 5.5 Recommendation of Utilizing 3-M Straightedge 67 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 69 REFERENCES 75 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 鋪面平坦度規範與指標轉換分析之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Study of Pavement Smoothness Specification and Indices Conversion Analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建旭,徐登文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 三米直規標準差,國際糙度指標IRI,平坦度驗收規範, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | 3-M Straightedge,IRI,Smoothness Specification, | en |
dc.relation.page | 79 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.77 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。