請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45723
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡政文(Cheng-Wen Tsai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Hao Kao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 高偉豪 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:45:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 書籍暨期刊文章
(一)中文書目 1. 中文書籍 蔡政文,《當前國際關係理論發展及其評估》,(台北市:三民總經銷,1989) 郭秋慶,《歐洲國家外交與安全政策》,(台北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司總經銷,2006) 張亞中,《小國崛起:轉捩點上的關鍵抉擇》,(台北市:聯經,2008) 張亞中,《國際關係總論》,(台北市:揚智文化,2003) 張亞中,《歐洲統合:政府間主義與超國家主義的互動》,(台北市:揚智文化,1998) 林碧炤,《國際政治與外交政策》,(台北:五南,1980) 陳勁,《歐盟外交政策與對外關係》,(台北:五南圖書,2002) 錢武南、楊連仲譯,《北約擴張與歐洲情勢譯文彙輯》,(台北:國防部軍務局,1998) Charles Zorgbibe著,胡祖慶譯,《國際關係》(Les Relations Internationales),(台北市:五南,1995) John M. Hobson著,周邵彥譯,《國家與國際關係》(The State and International Relations),(台北市:弘智文化,2003) Roy Macridis編,胡祖慶譯,《當代各國外交政策》(Foreign Policy and World Politics),(台北市:五南,1991) 2. 中文期刊 湯紹成,〈後冷戰時期北大西洋公約組織角色與功能的轉變〉,《問題與研究》,第39卷第1期,(民國89年1月),頁67-78。 藍玉春,〈解析歐盟阿姆斯特丹條約〉,《政治科學論叢》,第15期,(民國90年12月),頁15-44 張嘉斌,〈論歐洲安全暨防衛政策非軍事工具之建構與發展〉,《歐洲國際評論》,第三期 ,(2007年),頁45-74 甘逸驊,〈北約東擴-軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵〉,《問題與研究》,第42卷第4期,(2003年7、8月),頁1-23 甘逸驊,〈歐洲安全與防衛政策的軍事層面:歐盟的全球戰略地位〉,《問題與研究》,第45卷第5期,(2006年9、10月),頁111-136 3. 碩博士論文 劉志鴻,《後冷戰時期歐洲安全機制的演變與德國的角色之研究》,淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文,(2001年) 吳于珊,《後冷戰時期中國對東協外交政策之研究》,台灣大學政治學系碩士論文,(2007年) 4.研討會暨研究機構學術文章 吳萬寶,〈變與不變:里斯本條約與歐洲安全暨防衛政策〉,發表於2009年「里斯本條約對歐盟的衝擊」研討會,(2009) 吳志光,〈影響歐洲整合深遠的:阿姆斯特丹條約簡介〉,發表於「歐洲聯盟研究協會」網站,(1999),(www.eusa-taiwan.org) 羅國應,〈是人道干涉還是霸權國家的內政干涉?─淺談美國及NATO在科索沃事件的表現〉,發表於「歐洲聯盟研究協會」網站,(2001.03.27),(www.eusa-taiwan.org/cgi-bin/association/8/8-18.htm) 張洋培,〈歐洲聯盟建軍之展望〉,發表於政大國關中心「歐盟研究論壇」,(2002.03.29),(http://www.gec.ttu.edu.tw/group/g/cyp/YPCSCAN/another/eumilitary.pdf) 王俊評,〈歐安組織致力解決非傳統安全議題〉,發表於「尖端科技軍武論壇」網站,(2009.05.22) , (http://news.gpwb.gov.tw/newpage_blue/news.php?css=2&nid=90330&rtype=2<pF) 〈歐盟通過里斯本條約的政經內涵〉,發表於行政院經濟建設委員會網站,(2008.02.12),(www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0009811) (二) 英文書目 1. 英文書籍 Adrian Hyde-Price, European Security in the Twenty-first Century—The Challenge of multipolarity, (New York: Routledge, 2007) Amry J. Vandenbosch, Dutch Foreign Policy since 1815: A Study in Small Power Politics, (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959) Ben Tonra, The Europeanisation of National Foreign Policy: Dutch, Danish and Irish Foreign Policy in the European Union, (Aldershot[etc.]: Ashgate, 2001) Chris Brown&Kirsten Ainley, Understanding International Relations, (Basingstoke [etc.]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005 ) Ch.C. Pentland (ed.), The transatlantic link in evolution: what has changed since 11 September 2001, (Kingston: Centre for International Relations, Queen's University, 2003) Daniel S. Hamilton, Transatlantic Transformations: Equipping NATO for the 21st Century, (Washington D.C: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2004) E. Bakker & B. Bomert, The OSCE and the Netherlands as Chairman-in-Office, (The Hague: Netherlands Helsinki Committee2003) Erwin Schmidl (ed.), Peace and War: Four Studies, (Vienna: Landesverteidigungsakademie/Militarwissenschaftliches Buro,1998) Emanuel Adler & Michael Barnett (eds.), Security Communities, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998) Finn Laursen & Sophie Vanhoonacker (eds.), The ratification of Maastricht Treaty: issues, debates, and future implications, (Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1994) George Liska, War and Order: Reflections on Vietnam and History, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968) Hamilton Daniel S. (ed.), Transatlantic Transformations: equipping NATO for the 21st century, (Washington D.C: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2004) Han Van Der Horst, The Low Sky: Understanding the Dutch, (Den Haag: Nufic, 2006) Hans Mouritzen; Anders Wivel, The geopolitics of Euro-Atlantic integration, (London [etc.] : Routledgem, 2005) Hayward, Jack and Edward C. Page (eds.), Governing the New Europe, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998) Hrsg. von H.-G. Ehrhart (ed.), Die Europaische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik: Positionen, Perzeptionen, Probleme, Perspektiven, (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2002) Ir J.J.C. Voorhoeve, Peace, Profits and Principles: A Study of Dutch Foreign Policy, (The Hague : Nijhoff, 1979) Jaap de Zwaan, Edwin Bakker & Kees Homan (eds.), Challenges in a Changing World : Clingendael Views on Global and Regional Issues, (The Hague : Clingendael, 2009) Jan Willem Honig, Defense Policy in the North Atlantic Alliance: The Case of the Netherlands, (Westport, Conn., [etc.] : Praeger, 1993) J.de Zwaan, E. Bakker and S. van der meer (eds.), Challenges in a Changing World, (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009) Jorg Erik Noll, Leadership and Institutional Reform in Consensual Democracies: Dutch and Swedish Defense Organizations after the Cold War, (Gottingen : Cuvillier, 2005) John Baylis, Steve Smith &Patricia Owens, The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) Julian Lindley-French, A Chronology of European Security and Defence 1945-2007, (New York : Oxford University Press, 2007) J. Rainne, Legal Implications of NATO Membership: Focus on Finland and Five Allied States, (Helsinki: Erik Castren Institute Research Reports, 2008) Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, (London: Addison-Wesley, 1989) Max Otte& Jurgen Greve, A Rising Middle Power? German Foreign Policy in Transformation, 1989-1999, (New York: St. Martine’s Press, 2000) Mark Webber, Michael Smith & David Allen, Foreign Policy in a Transformed World, (Harlow[etc.]: Prentice Hall, 2002) Mendeltje van Keulen, Going Europe or Going Dutch: how the Dutch government shapes European Union Policy, (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2006) Nigel Ashton and Duco Hellema (eds.), Unspoken Allies: Anglo-Dutch Relations Since 1780, (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2001) O. Elgstrom Routledge (ed.), European Union Council presidencies: a comparative perspective, (London: Routledge, 2003) Rudolf Bastiaan Andeweg & Galen Arnold Irwin, Governance and Politics of the Netherlands, (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002) Tom Lansford & Blagovest Tashev, Old Europe, New Europe and the US: Renegotiating Transatlantic Security in the Post 9/11 Era, (Aldershot[etc.]: Ashgate, 2005) Wolfgang F. Schlor, German Security Policy: an Examination of the Trends in German Security Policy in a new European and Global Context, (London: Brassey’s for the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1993) 2. 期刊暨專書論文 Alfred van Staden, “Small State Strategies in Alliances: The case of the Netherlands”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol.30, No.1, (1995), pp. 31-51 Afred van Staden, “The Security Implications of 11 September 2001: A Dutch Perspective”, in: Charles C. Pentland (ed.), The Transatlantic Link in Evolution: What has changed since 11 September 2001?, (Kingston: Centre for the International Relations Queen’s University, 2003), pp.25-32 Alistair J.K. Shepherd, “The European Union’s Security and Defence Policy: A policy without substance?”, European Security, Vol.12, No.1, (March 2003), pp. 39-63 Bernhard Stahl, etc., “Understanding the Atlanticist—Europeanist Divide in the CFSP: Comparing Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands”, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol.9, (2004), pp.417-441 Christ Kelp, “Peacekeepers in a Warlike Situation: The Dutch Experience” in: Erwin Schmidl (ed.), Peace and War: Four Studies, (Vienna: Landesverteidigungsakademie/Militarwissenschaftliches Buro, 1998), (www.bmlv.gv.at/pdf_pool/publikationen/01_11pop_05_klep.pdf), pp.59-68 David G. Haglund, “The Transatlantic Link in Evolution: What Has Changed Since 11 September 2001”, in: Charles C. Pentland (ed.), The Transatlantic Link in Evolution: What has changed since 11 September 2001?, (Kingston: Centre for the International Relations Queen’s University, 2003), pp.3-24 Dirk C. van Raemdonck, “Benelux Security Policy”, in: Tom Landsford and Blagovest Tashev (eds.), Old Europe, New Europe and the US—Renegotiating Transatlantic Security in the Post 9/11 Era, (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), pp.79-101 Edwin Bakker & Kees Homan, “The Netherlands Armed Forces Promoting the International Rule of Law and Stability: Matching Ambitions, Structures and Funds”, in: Jaap de Zwaan, Edwin Bakker & Kees Homan (eds.), Challenges in a Changing World: Clingendaell views on global and regional issues, (The Hague: Clingendael, 2009), pp.247-259 Eelco Runia, “Forget About it: Parallel Processing in the Srebrenica Report”, History and Theory, Vol.43, No.3, (October 2004), pp.295-320 Fotini Bellou, “Srebrenica—The War Crimes Legacy: International Arguments, Intervention and Memory”, Southeast European and Black Sear Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, (September 2007), pp.387-398 Howorth, J. “Towards a European Foreign and Security Policy”, in: Hayward, Jack and Edward C. Page (eds.), Governing the New Europe, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), pp. 317-345 Jaap de Zwaan, ‘Reflecting the World : Impressions from a Dutch Perspective.’, in : Jaap de Zwaan, Edwin Bakker & Kees Homan (eds.), Challenges in a Changing World : Clingendael Views on Global and Regional Issues, (The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 9 December, 2008), pp.1-15 Jan Rood, “The Netherlands as an EU member state: A middle-sized country in search of its European destiny”, Da Favorita Paper, (December 2009), p.62-72 Jan Valouch, “Developmental trends in the armament within the armed forces of the Netherlands”, Defence & Strategy, Vol.2/2003, (2003), (www.army.cz/mo/obrana_a_strategie/2-2003eng/valouch.pdf), pp.119-127 Javier Solana, “NATO’s Success in Kosovo”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.78, No. 6, (November/December,1999), pp.114-120 Kori Schake, “NATO after the Cold War, 1991-1995: Institutional Competition and the Collapse of the French Alternative”, Contemporary European History, Vol.7, No. 3, (November 1998), pp.379-407 Maarten C. Brands, “The Federal Republic of Germany and the Netherlands: contrasts and complementarity”, Internationale Spectator, vol.43, no.11, (November 1989), pp.690-696 Marc Brinkman, “The Dutch Contribution to the UKNL Amphibious Force: Adapting to changes in the global security situation”, RUSI Defence Systems, Vol.9, No.1, (July 2006), p.70-71 Marcel de Haas, “Dutch Defence Doctrine”, The Officer Magazine, Vo1.18, No.1, (January/February 2006), (http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/2006/20060100%20_cscp_art_haas_officer.pdf), pp. 24-27 Marcel de Haas, ‘Dutch Military Power: From Screbrenica to Uruzgan’, The Officer Magazine, Vol.19, No.2, (July/August 2007), (http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/2007/20070700_cscp_art_haas_officer.pdf), pp. 14-16 Marcel de Haas, “From defense doctrine to national security strategy: the case of the Netherlands”, Strategic Review for Southern Africa, (November, 2007), pp.1-22 Mendeltje van Keulen, “The Netherlands 2004 EU Council Presidency: Dutch EU Policy-making in the Spotlights”, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, (October 2004), pp.7-40 Mendeltje van Keulen & Jan Q. Th. Rood, “The Netherlands’ Presidency of 1997: between ambition and modesty”, in: O. Elgstrom Routledge (ed.), European Union Council presidencies: a comparative perspective, (London: Routledge, 2003), pp.71-86 Ole Waever, “Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-War Community”, in: Emanuel Adler & Michael Barnett (eds.), Security Communities, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 69-118 Paul. J. Teunissen “Dutch defence policy in NATO and the EU: a multifaceted balancing act”, in: Hrsg. von H.-G. Ehrhart (ed.), Die Europaische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik: Positionen, Perzeptionen, Probleme, Perspektiven, (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2002), pp.74-87 Peter van Ham, “The Dutch Presidency: An Assessment”, Journal Complication, Vol. 43, Annual Review, (2005), pp.59-62 Ramses A. Wessel, “The Netherlands and NATO”, in: J. Rainne, Legal Implications of NATO Membership: Focus on Finland and Five Allied States, (Helsinki: Erik Castren Institute Research Reports, 2008), pp.137-161 Rees, G. Wyn, “The Netherlands: Reorientating its defence priorities”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol.17, No.1, (1996), pp.174-176 Rene Moelker et al., “Sympathy, the Cement of Interoperability—Findings on Ten Years of German-Netherlands Military Cooperation”, Armed Forces & Society, Vol.33, No.4, (July 2007), pp.496-517 Rob de Wijk, “Transatlantic Relations: A View from the Netherlands”, International Journal, Vol. 59, No.1, (2003/2004), pp.167-186 Rob de Wijk, “The Implications for Force Transformation: The Small Country Perspective”, in: Hamilton Daniel S. (ed.), Transatlantic Transformations: equipping NATO for the 21st century, (Washington D.C: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2004), pp.115-145 Virginie Mamadouh, “Establishing a Constitution for Europe during European Union enlargement? Visions of ‘Europe’ in the referenda campaigns in France and the Netherlands”, Journal of Cultural Geography, Vol. 26, No. 3, (October 2009), pp.305-326 3. 研討會暨智庫學術文獻 Advisory Council on International Affairs (AIV), Annual Report 2007, (www.aiv-advies.nl/ContentSuite/upload/aiv/doc/JV_2007_webversie(1).pdf) Anders Wivel, “The Grand Strategies of Small European States”, paper prepared for the panel Security of Small States: Historical and Strategic Perspectives at the 50th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New York, USA, (February 15-18, 2009) Atlantische Commissie, Transatlantic Relations and the Management of Disorder, Report to the Netherlands Atlantic Commission, the Hague, (February 1993) Elizabeth Book, “Budget Surge Marks Shift in Dutch Defense”, from the website NDIA’s Business and Technology Magazine, (November 2002), (http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ARCHIVE/2002/NOVEMBER/Pages/Budget_Surge3987.aspx) Giles Scott-Smith, “Tales from the Margins: Entering the Anglosphere”, published in the website Libertas, a research institute of US foreign policy in University of Birmingham, (www.libertas.bham.ac.uk/analysis/entering%20the%20anglosphere.pdf), pp.1-4 Hans Vollaard en Bartho Boer, “Euroscepticism in the Netherlands”, Paper prepared for the EpsNet European in Context: Debating the Project in Central European University, Budapest, (June 16-17, 2006) Jens Ringsmose and Sten Rynning, “Come Home, NATO? The Atlantic Alliance’s New Strategic Concept”, Diis Report, published by Danish Institute for International Studies, (April 2009), (www.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/Reports2009/DIIS_report_200904_RingmoseRynning_NATO_web.pdf) Military Education Research Library, “Summary of the Defence White Paper 2000” from the website Military Education Research Library Network, (merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/Netherlands-2000.pdf) Netherlands Ministry of Defence Directorate of General Information, The Netherlands Ministry of Defence—Facts and figures on Dutch security policy and the armed forces, published by Netherlands Ministry of Defence Directorate of General Information , (July 2004), (http://www.politiek2015.nl/cms/upload/artikelen/SecurityPolicyMinistryDefence.pdf) Stanley R. Sloan, 2009, “The Netherlands and NATO’s New Strategic Concept: Observations and Policy Recommendations from the Netherlands Atlantic Association” , a draft report presented to the Foreign Ministry of the Netherlands, (http://www.natoconcept.ca/netherlands2009.pdf) Theo van den Doel, “The Dutch Case: Security Policy in the Netherlands—Introduction on Security Policy of the Netherlands and the influence of NATO and EU”, (http://www.dcaf.ch/_docs/Ukraine_EuroAtlantic/U2_23.pdf), pp.229-232 Tim Sweijs, “The Hague Strategic Note—Military Intervention Decision Making Revisited: Getting A [Constitutional] Grip on 21st Century Wars”, published by The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, (October 2009) , (www.europesworld.org/NewEnglish/Home_old/PartnerPosts/tabid/671/PostID/812/Default.aspx) Wilhelm F. van Eekelen, “WEU after two Brussels Summits: A new approach to common tasks”, paper delivered at the Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels, (January 27 1994) Willem Post, “Another name for NATO”, Clingendael Commentary, The Hague Clingendael Institute, (April 14, 2008), (http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/2008/20080414_clingendael_commentary_2_post.pdf) 4. 外文報紙暨雜誌文章 “The end of the Dutch. But when?”, NRC Handelsblad, 2008.12.15, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/Features/article2093551.ece/The_end_of_the_Dutch_Antilles,_but_when) “Balkenende creates nine months' breathing space”, NRC Handelsblad, 2009.02.12, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/opinion/article2150419.ece/Balkenende_creates_nine_months_breathing_space) “Netherlands in top 10 of foreign agent lobbying in US”, NRC Handelsblad, 2009.08.21, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/article2335800.ece/Netherlands_in_top-10_of_foreign_agent_lobbying_in_US) “Labour Party wants US nuclear weapons removed from Dutch soil”, NRC Handelsblad, 2009.09.11 , (http://www.nrc.nl/international/article2356724.ece/Labour_party_wants_US_nuclear_weapons_removed_from_Dutch_soil) “Who will be what in the new Europe?”, NRC Handelsblad, 2009.10.07, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/europe/article2380462.ece/Who_will_be_what_in_the_new_Europe) “Balkenende: more chairman than president for Europe”, NRC Handelsblad, 2009.11.03, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/Features/article2404219.ece/Balkenende_more_chairman_than_president_for_Europe) “EU leaders chose path of least resistance”, NRC Handelsblad, 2009.11.19, (www.nrc.nl/international/europe/article2418389.ece/EU_leaders_chose_path_of_least_resistance) “Dutch Government Misrepresented case for Iraq War” , NRC Handelsblad, 2010.1.12, (www.nrc.nl/international/article2456912.ece) “The Future of Dutch Foreign Policy”, NRC Handelsblad, 2010.01.29, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/opinion/article2471351.ece/The_future_of_Dutch_foreign_policy) “Dutch Cabinet, Balkenende’s fourth, collapses”, NRC Handelsblad, 2010.2.20, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/article2488239.ece/Dutch_cabinet,_Balkenendes_fourth,_collapses) “Dutch draft scenarios for post-Afghanistan military”, NRC Handelsblad, 2010.03.31, (http://www.nrc.nl/international/article2514091.ece/Dutch_draft_scenarios_for_post-Afghanistan_military) “Lubbers’ Last Cabinet Term: a Brief History”, NIS News Bulletin, 1994.03.05, (www.nisnews.nl/dossiers/royal_house/030594_117.htm) “Who is Who in the New Cabinet”, NIS News Bulletin, 1994.08.19, (www.nisnews.nl/dossiers/royal_house/190894_191.htm) “Ben Bot installed as Foreign Minister”, NIS News Bulletin, 2003.12.04, (www.nisnews.nl/dossiers/royal_house/041203_1314.htm) “Dutch Minister: Iraq war may have been a bad idea”, BreakingNews.ie, 2005.05.10, (www.breakingnews.ie/archives/2005/1005/world/dutch-minister-iraq-war-may-have-been-a-bad-idea-224072.html) “Will they be ready for Maastricht?”, Economist , Vol. 320, Issue 7725, (September 1991) “Dutch cabinet resigns over Srebrenica massacre”, The Independent, 2002.04.17, (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/dutch-cabinet-resigns-over-srebrenica-massacre-657505.html) “Dutch government resigns after critical report on Srebrenica massacre”, World Socialist Web Site , 2002.04.19, (http://www3.wsws.org/articles/2002/apr2002/sre-a19.shtml) “If we must go to war, let’s not go Dutch”, The Guardian, 2002.04.24, (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/672208/posts) “Back-to-Back Dutch Government Crises: First Iraq, Now Afghanistan”, MSNBC.com, 2010.02.19, (http://themoderatevoice.com/63588/back-to-back-dutch-government-crises-first-iraq-now-afghanistan) “Dutch heading for polls as government collapses”, EurActiv Network, 2010.02.22, (http://www.euractiv.com/en/elections/dutch-heading-polls-government-collapses-news-275129) 貳、 網路資料 世界銀行網站2008年GDP排名數據:http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP.pdf 世界經濟論壇發表之2009/2010全球競爭力指標文件:http://www.weforum.org/pdf/GCR09/GCR20092010fullrankings.pdf 維基百科(Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org 1. 鹿特丹: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotterdam 2. 史基浦機場:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amsterdam_Airport_Schiphol 世界100大港:http://www.cargosystems.net/freightpubs/cs/top100supplement.htm 圖片2-1荷蘭地圖來源:http://image.wtojob.com/class/photo/nethrlnd-big.gif 荷蘭總理府網站 http://www.minaz.nl/ 1. Speech by the Prime Minister, Dr Jan Peter Balkenende, Charles University (Prague), 2009.12.11 2. Toespraak minister-president bij het World Leadership Forum 2008, 2008.09.24 3. Brief statement by Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende following the start of the armed conflict in Iraq. 4. Address by Peter Balkenende Prime Minister of the Netherlands at a Commemorative Ceremony on September 11 at the Hague City Hall, 2002.09 荷蘭外交部網站http://www.minbuza.nl/ 1. Speech at ‘Globalisation and Dutch foreign policy’, 2007.05.31 2. Speech by Verhagen at Atlantische Commissie, 2008.03.27 3. “Changing world, constant values: foreign policy in the twenty-first century”, Speech by Maxime Verhagen at the Opening of the Academic Year of University of Leiden, 2008.09.01 4. “An Active foreign policy brings opportunities to the Netherlands”, press release from The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2008.09.16 5. Verhagen Opening speech at “Future Policy Survey Dutch Armed Forces” , 2008.12.16 6. “Verhagen positive about France’s return to NATO military command”, 2009.03.12 7. “The Future of Transatlantic Relations”, speech by Verhagen at CDA Conference, 2010.01.27 8. Speech by Maxime Verhagen at Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2010.03.16 9. “Stronger Europe, Stronger Netherlands”, Speech by Verhagen at 2010 Conference on Europe’s Security, 2010.05.17 西歐聯盟網站http://www.weu.int/ 1. “Declaration of the Heads of State and Government of Germany, France, Luxembourg and Belgium on European Defense, Brussels”, 2003.04.29 歐洲聯盟官方網站http://europa.eu/ 北大西洋公約組織官方網站 http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/index.htm 荷蘭大使館網站http://www.netherlands-embassy.org.vn/about_the/general_information/foreign_policy 荷蘭駐美國大使館網站:荷蘭參與聯合國維和行動http://www.netherlandsmission.org/article.asp?articleref=AR00000201EN 美國國務院網站:“Background Note: the Netherlands” http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3204.htm 海軍研究智庫AMI的荷蘭介紹: http://www.amiinter.com/samples/netherlands/general.html 美國中情局網站的荷蘭介紹: http://www.centcom.mil/en/countries/coalition/netherlands/ World Fact Book https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ 聯合國網站:聯合國一覽http://www.un.org/zh/aboutun/ 海牙國際關係學院Clingendael http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/archive/?volume=2006 海牙戰略研究中心The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies http://www.hcss.nl/en/home 「基督教傳播網」(CBN): news.iqilu.com/caijing/20091222/146721.html 行政院經濟建設委員會網站 www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0009811 羅斯福四大自由獎座網站:http://www.fourfreedoms.nl/index.php?lang=en&id=51 美國中央指揮部網站的荷蘭介紹:http://www.centcom.mil/en/countries/coalition/netherlands/ 德國外交部網站對荷蘭的介紹:http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laenderinformationen/01-Laender/Niederlande.html Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) http://www.diis.dk/sw152.asp Encyclopedia of the Nations: The Netherlands-Foreign Policy: www.nationsencyclopedia.com/World-Leaders-2003/The-Netherlands-FOREIGN-POLICY.html Franco-British Summit Joint Declaration on European Defense: www.atlanticcommunity.org/Saint-Malo%20Declaration%20Text.html World Socialist Web Site http://www3.wsws.org/index.shtml The Holland Bureau: Notes from below sea level…: 1. Giles Scott-Smith, “Pandora’s Box?, 2010.01.12, (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/01/16/reflections-on-davids-i/) 2. Giles Scott-Smith, “Reflections on Davids: II”, 2010.01.12, (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/01/16/reflections-on-davids-ii/) 3. Giles Scott-Smith, “Reflections on Davids: I”, 2010.01.16, (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/01/16/reflections-on-davids-i/) 4. Giles Scott-Smith, ‘Reflections on Davids: III’, 2010.01.18 (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/01/18/reflections-on-davids-iii/) 5. “Chris Klep on the Davids Report”, 2010.01.20, (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/01/20/guest-blog-chris-klep-on-the-davids-report/) 6. Giles Scott-Smith, “De Hoop Scheffer: NL must stay in Uruzgan”, 2010.01.26, (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/01/26/de-hoop-scheffer-nl-must-stay-in-uruzgan/) 7. Giles Scott-Smith, “Davids: The Dutch Cabinet Responds”, 2010.02.04, (www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/02/04/davids-the-dutch-cabinet-responds/) 8. Giles Scott-Smith, “Frank Gerits: The Belgian View of the Atlantic Reflex II”, 2010.02.09, (http://www.thehollandbureau.com/2010/02/09/frank-gerits-the-belgian-view-on-the-atlantic-reflex-ii/) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45723 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 二戰之後,荷蘭改變過去中立的傳統,改採結盟策略。荷蘭透過參與北大西洋公約組織(NATO)與大西洋遙相對望的美國結盟,是為「跨大西洋主義」。這個安全政策主軸基本上延續到冷戰結束。蘇聯垮台之後,國際體系面臨劇烈的轉變,牽動了歐洲的權力格局,連帶的也影響到了荷蘭的歐洲安全政策。
本篇論文便是聚焦荷蘭在後冷戰時期歐洲安全政策的變化,發現其依舊延續過去的「跨大西洋主義」做為戰略主軸,惟在內涵上除了持續支持北約組織之外,也納入了歐盟CFSP/ESDP的防衛力量。導致這種變化可以區分為內、外兩種因素,但主要的影響是外部因素為重。因為國際體系的變化造成權力重整,美國調整全球戰略,歐洲大國則各有盤算,使得「大西洋主義」與「歐洲主義」兩種安全路線開始競逐。於是荷蘭的歐洲安全政策便在北約與歐盟間調整拉鋸。但從新現實主義的權力觀點而言,現階段美國對歐洲依舊有防衛意願,實力上也依舊佔有優勢,因此「跨大西洋主義」仍最符合荷蘭的國家安全需要。所以儘管後冷戰的政策內涵上採用「雙管齊下」,但是大西洋主義戰略依舊是荷蘭歐洲安全政策無可取代的主旋律。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the wake of World War II, the Netherlands ended its self-imposed neutrality, and started forming alliances with other countries by joining NATO, thereby becoming an ally of the United States and marking the emergence of“Transatlanticism”. Such an approach to security policy remained unchanged until the end of the Cold War. With the downfall of the Soviet Union, the international system underwent significant changes, tipping the balance of power in Europe and further impacting the European security policy of the Netherlands.
This paper aims to explore the evolution of the European security policy of the Netherlands in the post-Cold War era. It is found that the lowland country is still pursuing transatlanticism as its strategic objective, yet its allegiance to NATO has now been coupled with the CFSP/ESDP adopted by the European Union. The trend is shaped by both domestic and international forces, with the latter holding sway. Changes in power structure have prompted the US to reassess its global strategies, while major European countries play cards close to their chest. The tug-of-war between Atlanticism/NATO and Europeanism/EU propelled the pendulum of the Netherlands’ European security policy to swing back and forth. From the perspective of neo-realism, however, the US, which maintains its military strength, remains willing to assist Europe in defense efforts. Consequently, despite the dual strategy in place, transatlanticism still meets the needs and remains at the heart of the Netherlands’ European security policy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:45:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95322035-1.pdf: 1341842 bytes, checksum: 854d7e9c6843884c9850dbb5e8956e54 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論..............................................1
第一節 研究動機與目的................................1 第二節 研究理論與本文架構............................5 第三節 研究範圍與限制...............................12 第四節 章節安排.....................................14 第二章 荷蘭的環境與基本對外政策.........................16 第一節 荷蘭的環境...................................16 1. 地理.........................................16 2. 歷史.........................................18 第二節 荷蘭的基本政策對外政策.......................23 第三章 荷蘭後冷戰時期的歐洲安全政策.....................30 第一節 後冷戰時期的歐洲安全政策內涵.................31 1. Ruud Lubbers內閣 (1989~1994) .................31 2. Wim Kok內閣 (1994~2002) ......................32 3. Jan Peter Balkenende內閣(2002~2010) ...........36 第二節 政策的決策過程............................... 41 1. Ruud Lubbers內閣的決策過程.....................43 2. Wim KoK內閣的決策過程..........................46 3. Jan Peter Balkenende內閣.......................49 第三節 政策執行的思維與理論基礎.....................52 1. 政策執行的思維.................................53 2. 政策執行的理論基礎.............................55 第四章 影響荷蘭的歐洲安全政策之因素.....................61 第一節 外部因素.....................................62 1. 國際體系變遷:二元體系瓦解、安全威脅轉變.......62 2. 區域組織發展:北約續存茁壯、歐盟CFSP出現......64 3. 大國對歐洲安全的態度與實力....................70 4. 國際事件......................................75 第二節 內部因素.....................................80 1. 大西洋主義傳統................................80 2. 地緣位置......................................81 3. 憲法內容......................................82 4. 政治決策傳統:「聯而不合」的偏好...............83 5. 經濟因素......................................84 6. 軍事預算削減..................................86 7. 政黨立場......................................86 8. 國會的態度....................................87 9. 民意..........................................88 第五章 荷蘭的歐洲安全政策之執行.........................90 第一節 全球層次:聯合國.............................90 第二節 區域層次.....................................92 1. 北約.........................................93 2. 歐盟.........................................96 3. 歐安組織.....................................98 第三節 雙邊層次.....................................99 1. 美國........................................100 2. 英國........................................102 3. 德國........................................104 4. 法國........................................105 第六章 荷蘭的歐洲安全政策之效力評析....................109 第一節 政策執行的效力評估..........................109 1. 全球層次....................................109 2. 區域層次....................................110 3. 雙邊層次....................................113 第二節 影響政策執行效力的因素分析..................115 1. 大國態度....................................116 2. 國際組織的效能與類型........................118 3. 有無清楚戰略................................120 第七章 荷蘭的歐洲安全政策之評估與展望..................123 第一節 荷蘭的歐洲安全政策評估......................123 1. 戰略清楚....................................123 2. 策略靈活....................................123 3. 方向務實....................................124 第二節 理論檢證與評估..............................125 1. 無政府狀態與國家中心論......................125 2. 國際體系結構................................127 3. 權力、權力平衡與國家利益....................128 4. 國際衝突與國際合作..........................129 5. 安全至上....................................130 6. 小國策略....................................131 第三節 荷蘭之歐洲安全政策展望......................132 第八章 結論............................................137 參考書目................................................142 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 後冷戰時期荷蘭的歐洲安全政策 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Dutch European Security Policy in Post-Cold War Era | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭秋慶,陳世民 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 荷蘭,歐洲安全政策,大西洋主義,新現實主義,後冷戰時期, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | the Netherlands,European Security Policy,Atlanticism,Neo-Realism,Post-Cold War Era, | en |
dc.relation.page | 154 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.31 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。