Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 圖書資訊學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45623
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林珊如(Shan-Ju L. Chang)
dc.contributor.authorYuan-Yuan Hungen
dc.contributor.author洪元元zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T04:31:03Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-20
dc.date.copyright2009-08-20
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-08-19
dc.identifier.citationAucouturier, J.J & Pachet, F. (2003, March). Representing musical genres: A state of the art . Journal of New Music Research, 32(1), 83-93.
Awards. (2009). Retrieved May 11, 2009, from The Recording Academy Web site: http://www.grammy.com/Recording_Academy/Awards/
Bainbridge, D., Bernbom, G., Davidson, M. W., Dillon, A. P. , Dovey, M., Dunn, J.W., et al. (2001). Digital music libraries—research and development. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL’01)(pp. 446-448). New York: The Association for Computing Machinery.
Bainbridge, D., Cunningham, S.J., & Downie, J.S. (2003). How people describe their music information needs: A grounded theory analysis of music queries. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2003). Retrieved June 30, 2006, from ISMIR 2003 Web Site: http://ismir2003.ismir.net/papers/Bainbridge.pdf
Bates, M. J. (1989, October). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-424.
Billboard Methodology. (2008). Retrieved December 11, 2008, from Billboard.com Web site: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/about_us/bbmethodology.jsp
Blackburn, B. (2006, May-June). Taxonomy design types. AIIM E-DOC, 20(3), 14-16.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Broughton, V. (2004). Essential classification. London: Facet Publishing.
Chai, W., & Vercoe, B. (2000). Using user models in music information retrieval systems. In D. Byrd (Chair), Proceedings of the 1st annual international symposium on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2000), Massachusetts, U.S.A.. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/music2000/posters/chai.pdf
Chan, L. M. (2001). Exploiting LCSH, LCC, and DDC to retrieve networked resources: Issues and challenges. In Ann M. Sandberg-Fox (Ed.), Proceedings of the bicentennial conference on bibliographic control for the new millennium (pp.159-178). Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress.
Chen, H., Houston, A. L., Sewell, R. R., & Schatz, B. R. (1998, May). Internet browsing and searching: User evaluations of category map and concept space techniques. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(7), 582-603.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B. & Turnbull, D. (2000). Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5(2). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from First Monday Web site: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_2/choo/index.html
Cunningham, S.J., Jones, M., and Jones, S. (2004, October). Organizing digital music for use: an examination of personal music collections. In X. Serra (Chair), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2004), Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://ismir2004.ismir.net/proceedings/p082-page-447-paper221.pdf
Cunningham, S.J., Reeves, N., & Britland, M. (2003, May). An ethnographic study of music information seeking: Implications for the design of a music digital library. In Proceedings of the 2003 joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL’03) (pp. 5-27). Houston: IEEE Computer Society.
Danaher, B. G., McKay, H. G., & Seeley, J. R. (2005, April-June). The information architecture of behavior change Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(2). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from PubMed Central Web Site: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1550648
Dervin B. & Nilan M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 21, 3-33.
Erdelez, S. (1995). Information encountering: An exploration beyond information seeking. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
Farkas, A. K. & Farkas, J. B. (2002). Principles of Web design. New York: Longman.
Farnum, C. (2002, June-July). Redesigning an e-business taxonomy: Egreetings case study. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 28(5), 10-13.
Garshol, L.M. (2004, August). Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! Making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science, 30 (4), 378-391.
Hodge, G. (2000). Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: Beyond traditional authority files [Electronic Version]. Washington, DC: The Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/pub91.pdf
Horrocks, R. (2007). Genre. In Ritzer, George (Ed), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from Blackwell Reference Online: http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_chunk_g978140512433113_ss1-34
Houghton J.& Vickery G. (2005). OECD report on digital music: Opportunities and challenges (Technical Report DSTI/ICCP/IE(2004)12/FINAL, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Web site: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/13/2/34995041.pdf
Huron, D. (2000, October). Perceptual and cognitive applications in music information retrieval. In D. Byrd (Chair), Proceedings of the 1st annual international symposium on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2000), Massachusetts, U.S.A.. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/music2000/papers/invites/HuronAbstract.pdf
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2006). IFPI’s digital music report 2006. London: International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/digital-music-report-2006.pdf
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2007). IFPI’s digital music report 2007. International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, London. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/digital-music-report-2007.pdf
Jacob, E. K. (2004). Classification and categorization: a difference that makes a difference. Library Trends, 52(3), 515-540.
Kim, J.-Y., & Belkin, N. J. (2002, October). Categories of music description and search terms and phrases used by non-music experts. In V. Puig (Chair), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2002), Paris, France. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://ismir2002.ismir.net/proceedings/02-FP07-2.pdf
Kwasnik, B. H. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends, 48(1), 22-47.
Kwasnik, B. H. (2002). Commercial websites and the use of classification schemas: The case of Amazon.com. In Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century. Integration of knowledge across boundaries (M. J. López-Huertas, Maria J. & F. J. Munoz-Férnandez, Eds., pp. 279-285). (Advances in Knowledge Organization, Vol. 8). Germany, Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Lee, J. H., & Downie, J. S. (2004, October). Survey of music information needs, uses, and seeking behaviours: Preliminary findings. In X. Serra (Chair), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2004), Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.iua.upf.es/mtg/ismir2004/review/CRFILES/paper232-02ba187c740dbd4cdef4084c135798a1.pdf
Lee, J. H., Downie, J. S., & Cunningham, S. J. (2005, September). Challenges in cross-cultural/multilingual music information seeking. In J. D. Reiss, & G. A. Wiggins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2005)(pp. 1-7). London, U.K.: Queen Mary, University of London.
Lowery, J. W. (2006). Planning Your Site [Excerpt from the Dreamweaver 8 Bible by J. W. Lowery, published by Wiley Publishing, Inc.]. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from WebAssist Professional web site: http://www.webassist.com/professional/community/webproresource/rapidsite/site_planning.asp
Lynch P. J., & Horton, S. (1999). Web style guide: Basic design principles for creating Web sites. New Havena: Yale University Press.
Malone, T. W. (1983). How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(1) 99-112.
Marchionini, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1988, January). Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. Computer, 21(1), 70-79.
Maurer, D. (2006, May). Information architecture: Beyond the hierarchy [Microsoft PowerPoint]. Webstock 06, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://maadmob.net/maadmob_id/pres/beyond_hierarchy/
Morrison, J. (2003, March). Understanding information taxonomy helps build better apps. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from Builder.com Web site: http://www.builderau.com.au/program/development/soa/Understanding-information-taxonomy-helps-build-better-apps/0,339024626,320275756,00.htm
Morville, P. (2006).Information by design [Supplement]. CIO Insight, 68, 59-66.
Nielsen, J. (1990). The art of navigating through hypertext. Communications of the ACM, 33, 296-310.
Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web usability. Indianapolis: New Riders.
O'Reilly, Tim. (2004, September). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from O'Reilly Web site: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Pachet, F. (2003, April). Content management for electronic music distribution. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 71-75.
Pachet, F. & Cazaly D. (2000). A taxonomy of musical genress. In J. Mariani & D. Harman (Eds.), Proceedings of content-based multimedia information access (RIAO) conference. Paris: France.
Pachet, F., Laburthe, A., Zils A. & Aucouturier, J. -J. (2003, May). Popular music access: The Sony music browser. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(12), 1037-1044.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London : Sage Publications.
Peters, T. (2004, November-December). Faceted taxonomy: Creating a better user experience through information discovery [Supplement: Best Practices In Enterprise Knowledge Management, Vol IV]. KM World, 13(10), S18.
Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 35, 43-78.
Rosenfeld, L. (2005, March). Happy times for IA?. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from LouisRosenfeld.com Web site: http://www.louisrosenfeld.com/home/bloug_archive/2005/03/happy_times_for_ia.html
Rosenfeld, L. & Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale Web sites. Cambridge: O'Reilly.
Smith, G. (2004, August). Folksonomy: social classification. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from Atomiq, a Weblog by Gene Smith Web site: http://atomiq.org/archives/2004/08/folksonomy_social_classification.html
Spink, A. & Cole C. (2006, January). Human information behavior: Integrating diverse approaches and information use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 25-35.
Su, C. (2004). An exploration of redundancy in classification schemes on the Web: A study of EIA and Amazon websites [Abstract]. Unpublished master’s thesis, School of Information and Library Science of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from SILS-ETD Web site: http://etd.ils.unc.edu/dspace/bitstream/1901/134/1/master+thesis.pdf
Taheri-Panah, S. and MacFarlane, A. (2004, October). Music Information Retrieval systems: why do individuals use them and what are their needs?. In X. Serra (Chair), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2004), Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.iua.upf.es/mtg/ismir2004/review/CRFILES/paper110-4fdb92210e1fc12267fc2ea0d8c6a1e6.pdf
Taxonomy (2007). In Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary. Springfield: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/taxonomy
Uddin, M. N., Islam, M. M., & Haque, K. M. G. (2006). Information description and discovery method using classification structures in Web. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 11(2), 1-20.
van Gulik, R., Vignoli, F., & van de Wetering (2004). Mapping music in the palm of your hand, explore and discover your collection. In X. Serra (Chair), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2004), Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.iua.upf.es/mtg/ismir2004/review/CRFILES/paper153-fac43d9ee7ddd1b5d0f50b5d35008a77.pdf
van Rees, R. (2003). Clarity in the usage of the terms ontology, taxonomy and classification. In A. Robert (Ed.), Proceedings of the CIB W78's 20th international conference on construction IT, construction IT bridging the distance (pp. 432-440). Waiheke Island, New Zealand: CIB Publication.
Vignoli, F. (2004). Digital music interaction concepts: A user study. In X. Serra (Chair), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on music information retrieval (ISMIR 2004), Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.iua.upf.es/mtg/ismir2004/review/CRFILES/paper152-a43073de45b23c41e9a31dfcfa57f6fc.pdf
Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56.
Yoon, K. (1998, October) The use of certainty and the role of topic and comment in interpersonal information seeking interaction. Information Research, 4(2). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from InformationR.net Web Site: http://InformationR.net/ir/4-2/isic/yoon.html
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-70.
Zeng, M. & Salaba A. (2005, May). Toward an international sharing and use of subject authority data [Microsoft PowerPoint]. In G. Riesthuis (Chair), FRANAR/FRAR state-of-the-art and consequences for implementation and subject access in FRBR. FRBR in 21st Century Catalogues: An Invitational Workshop, Ohio. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.oclc.org/asiapacific/zhtw/research/events/frbr-workshop/presentations/zeng/Zeng_Salaba.ppt
Roberts-Witt, S. L. (1999). Practical taxonomies: Hard-won wisdom for creating a workable knowledge classification system. Knowledge Management 2(1), 46-54.
卜小蝶(2006年12月)。淺談社會性標籤之意涵與應用〔電子版〕。在淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館、淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系、飛資得資訊有限公司主辦,Web2.0與圖書館研討會,台北市。上網日期:2007年6月15日,檢自:http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/libintro/pub/web20&lib_semina/social_tag_ft.pdf
卜小蝶(2007)。使用者導向之網路資源組織與檢索。台北市:文華。
王文科(1999)。教育研究法。台北市:五南出版。
王次炤(1997)。音樂美學新論。台北市:萬象。
史特勞斯、寇炳(Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.)(1997)。質性研究概論(Basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques)(徐宗國譯)。台北市:巨流出版。(原作1990年出版)
史密特(Schmitt, B.)(2000)。體驗行銷:電子商務時代的大霹靂行銷法則(Experiential Marketing)(王育英、梁曉鶯譯)。台北市:經典傳訊文化股份有限公司。(原作1999年出版)
台北市消費者電子商務協會(2005年9月7日)。「網路音樂下載大調查」∼高達85%的消費者使用網路下載音樂,54%願意付費使用。上網日期:2006年4月23日,檢自SOSA台北市消費者電子商務協會:http://www.sosa.org.tw/news/news3.asp
安德森(Anderson, C.)(2006)。長尾理論:打破80/20法則的新經濟學(The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more)(李明、周宜芳、胡瑋珊、楊美齡譯)。台北市:天下遠見。(原作2006年出版)
朱光潛(1958)。文藝心理學。台北市:開明。
朱澔偉(2005年11月27日)。合法數位音樂,商機嗄嗄叫。經濟日報,C6版。
何東洪(2007)。音樂語言與族群語言的拉扯—論金曲獎以音樂類型分類的必要。上網日期:2009年5月20日,檢自電視妙管家網站:http://www.twmedia.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=451。
利曼(Riemann, H.)(1969)。音樂美學(徐頌仁譯)。台北市:愛樂書店。
呂春嬌(2002年12月)。從分類理論看分類法未來的發展與趨勢。中國圖書館學會會報,69,176-199。
林珊如(2001年3月)。書籍網站資訊組織架構與瀏覽介面設計的考量:以亞馬遜網路書店為例。大學圖書館,5(1),16-32。
林珊如(2003)。本土化數位圖書館與博物館使用者研究:資訊需求、資訊搜尋與使用行為之探討。台北市:文華。
林珊如(2005年6月)。深度休閒與資訊行為研究。圖書資訊學刊,3(1/2),15-22。
林珊如(2006年10月)。數位圖書館使用者研究趨勢之考察。圖書館學與資訊科學,32(2),18-31。
林珊如(2006年10月)。數位圖書館使用者研究趨勢之考察。圖書館學與資訊科學,32(2),18-31。
林珮雯(2004)。電子商務網站介面設計研究-美感與使用性。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學傳播研究所,新竹市。
林雯瑤(2006年12月)。層面分類的概念與應用。教育資料與圖書館學,44(2),153-171。
邱子恆(2002年12月)。圖書資訊分類架構在組織與呈現知識上之應用。圖書資訊學刊,17,123-136。
金曲獎沿革(2008)。上網日期:2009年5月11日,檢自行政院新聞局全球資訊網網站:http://www.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=20281&CtNode=3747&mp=3
政治大學資訊科學系(2006年11月)。數位音樂典藏之資料探勘與智慧型檢索技術。上網日期:2007年6月15日,檢自:數位典藏國家型科技計畫,技術研發公開徵選計畫:http://www.music.cs.nccu.edu.tw/index.html
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流出版。
胡述兆、吳祖善(1991)。圖書館學導論。台北市:漢美。
朗格(1953)。情感與形式。在張洪模主編,現代西方藝術美學文選:音樂美學(頁305-346)。台北市:洪葉文化。
袁方(2002)。社會研究方法。台北市:五南出版。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2006年)。九十五年度台灣寬頻網路使用狀況調查摘要分析。上網日期:2006年4月23日,檢自台灣網路資訊中心網路使用調查:http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/0308a.doc
財團法人國際唱片業交流基金會(2005年1月20日)。國際唱片業看好數位音樂市場,合法授權將是發展關鍵〔新聞稿〕。上網日期:2006年4月23日,檢自財團法人國際唱片業交流基金會網站:http://www.ifpi.org.tw/news/0120總會/IFPI新聞稿_國際唱片業看好數位音樂市場%20合法授權將是發展關鍵_940120.htm
高敬文(1999)。質化研究方法論。台北市:師大出版。
張春興(1994)。心理學。台北市:東華。
張淇龍(2006年11月)。淺析Folksonomy之意涵與應用。中國民國圖書館學會電子報,14。上網日期:2007年6月15日,檢自:http://www.lac.org.tw/epaper/200614/folksonomy.pdf
教育部國語推行委員會編(2007)。重編國語辭典(修訂本)。台北市:教育部。上網日期:2009年6月10日,檢自重編國語辭典修訂本網路版:http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/newDict/dict.sh?cond=%B6%C7%BC%BD%B4C%C5%E9&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&ukey=1953989090&serial=2&recNo=1&op=f&imgFont=1
莫維里(Morville, P.)(2007)。隨意搜尋(Ambient findability)(蔡學鏞譯)。台北市:歐萊禮。(原作2006年出版)
莊裕澤、吳玲玲(2006)。彈性化之數位典藏瀏覽系統建置(國科會數位典藏國家型科技計畫,技術研發分項計畫計畫書,NSC94-2422-H002-014)。台北市:台灣大學資訊管理系暨研究所。上網日期:2007年6月15日,檢自:http://joung.im.ntu.edu.tw/adhoc_browse/94WFA0101130_BASE.pdf
荷索(Herzog, T.)(1996)。社會科學研究方法與資料分析(Research methods and data analysis in the social sciences)(朱柔若譯)。台北市:揚智文化出版。(原作1996出版)
郭美女(1999年6月)。兒童的音樂聆聽:感知和再現。台東師院學報,88(10),173-200。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南。
陳昭珍(2004)。國內外影音資料數位典藏現況與趨勢暨我國影音資訊平台建置相關規範研究(行政院新聞局委託期末報告)。台北市:台灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。上網日期:2007年6月15日,檢自:http://info.gio.gov.tw/public/Attachment/4122410285753.doc
陳家齊(2005年12月16日)。網路音樂大車拚,Google推出音樂搜尋。經濟日報,A8版。
陳碧鐘(2006)。95年出版年鑑。台北市:行政院新聞局。
傅思明(1991)。樂器。在中國大百科全書。北京:中國大百科全書出版社。上網日期:2009年5月15日,檢自中國大百科全書智慧藏:http://www.wordpedia.com/search/Content.asp?ID=26759
楊雅婷、阮明淑(2006年12月)。分類相關概念之術語學研究。國家圖書館館刊,2,25-50。
葉乃靜(1998年七月)。社論:資訊尋求行為。大學圖書館,2(3),2-3。
認識身體工房(2005)。上網日期:2009年6月30日,檢自:身體工房:http://www.spiritlands.com.tw/about.htm
劉忠陽、黃穗斌(2006年3月)。線上音樂單一定價之研究。傳播管理學刊,7(1),109-136。
歐湘寧(2007)。以隱喻抽取技術(ZMET)探討理想退休生活規劃之心智模式:應用於財富管理行銷策略分析。未出版之碩士論文,世新大學管理學院財務金融學研究所,台北市。
鄭麗玉(2006)。認知心理學:理論與應用。台北市:五南。
謝璦竹(2006年2月25日)。蘋果賣出第10億首歌。經濟日報,A5版。
謝寶煖(2004年11月20日)。大學圖書館網站資訊組織之研究。在2004現代資訊組織與檢索研討會(頁1-27)。台北市:淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45623-
dc.description.abstract使用者導向的線上音樂分類架構,可創造良好的瀏覽經驗,並觸發使用者的音樂需求;所謂使用者導向,應整合資訊行為整體脈絡,及資訊系統與特定資訊行為間的關係,以確保資訊系統設計與評估的完整性及應用性。本研究從使用者音樂聆賞整體歷程出發,瞭解使用者分類相關經驗,並提出線上音樂分類架構具體改善建議。在研究設計上,本研究分別從系統面及使用者面抽取音樂分類的要素、概念及行動,分析比對兩方面所得資料,以瞭解兩者間之差異及關聯。
系統面,針對立意抽樣及滾雪球抽樣取得的31個國內外線上音樂網站 / 資料庫之音樂分類架構進行內容分析。分析結果發現,線上音樂分類架構主要的分類層面為音樂類型、歌手 / 藝人、語言 / 地區及情境。在俗民分類的部分,分析Last.FM的熱門標籤,發現「音樂類型」仍是社群最常使用的標籤類型,其次為「語言 / 國家」、「情緒感受」及「個人」。此外,線上音樂分類架構具有「分類依據缺乏規則」、「類目名稱同義異字」、「分類隸屬不一致」、「以行銷為目的之類目安排」以及「英文音樂網站 / 資料庫分類依據多元」等現象。
使用者面,本研究邀請31位音樂愛好者參與研究,蒐集的資料包括:為期10∼30日份的音樂日誌(31位)、深度訪談記錄(25位)以及個人數位音樂蒐藏檔案列表(18位)。從資料中,發現音樂愛好者音樂聆賞歷程是由音樂聆賞行為、音樂尋求行為以及個人音樂組織行為所構成。而音樂聆賞歷程中,「分類」所扮演的角色,包括個人音樂蒐藏管理方式、音樂尋求輔助工具、音樂聆賞需求引動媒介以及聆賞者心理活動狀態表現。此外,本研究從31位音樂愛好者音樂日誌以及2,397篇網路音樂社群音樂尋求問答資料中,分析使用者描述音樂的構面,找出音樂潛在的分類方式。綜合上述使用者面之研究發現,歸結出使用者音樂分類「音樂固有屬性」及「音樂互動特性」兩大分類構面中各分類層面。
最後,分析比較音樂分類層面及類別項目,發現使用者分類與系統分類在「分類層面間連結對應關係」及「分類層面之應用功能」兩方面具有異同及關聯之處。
根據研究發現及研究結果,提出研究建議。在線上音樂資料庫之分類,建議系統應提供「完整描述型分類」以輔助使用者尋求特定音樂;此外「多元主題型分類」可輔助使用者尋求非特定音樂並引動潛在需求。針對個人數位音樂蒐藏分類,提出「將辨識音樂基本資訊標記於數位音樂檔案中」、「善用音樂分類層面的複分特性,減少垂直的階層數」、「彈性運用『暫存 / 其他』分類類別」、「界定『語言 / 地區 / 國家』分類層面之定義」以及「選擇功能齊全的音樂組織軟體」等建議。本研究屬於探索性研究,以探索過程及研究發現中的不足與限制為基礎,針對後續研究,提出「跨學門研究音樂分類」以及「結合多元研究方法探究音樂分類相關概念」兩項建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractA user-oriented taxonomy for online music databases is able to improve the browsing experience and trigger user's needs. In order to ensure the integrity and applicability in information systems design and evaluation, a user-oriented approach is supposed to integrate both the overall context of information behavior and specific behavior in relation to the information systems. Based on the overall music listening process, this study tries to explore classification-related user experiences and provide constructive suggestions to improve online music taxonomies. In the study design, this study extracts and analyzes elements, concepts and operations of music categorization from the music information retrieval (MIR) systems and users in order to realize the differences and relations between systems and users.
To discover the current developments in taxonomies for online music databases, this study analyzes 31 domestic and international online music databases collected by purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. The results show that music genre, artist, language/region, and context are the most widely used facets of the online music taxonomies. An analysis of the “Top Tags” list in Last.FM system shows that the “music genre” is the most commonly used type of tags which are produced by online community members, followed by “language/country”, “mood” and “personal” types of tags. In addition, this study explores the state of current developments in online music taxonomies, including “no exact rules in classification schemes”, “synonymous categories named differently from others”, “inconsistencies in the classification hierarchy”, “category arrangements based on marketing purposes” and “classification schemes of overseas music databases use a variety of facets to classify music collections.”
To investigate users’ overall context of music listening, 31 music lovers were invited to participate in this study and provided music dairies which recorded users’ everyday musical experience for 10-30 days, in depth interview records and the list of personal digital music collections. Results indicated that the music listening process is consisted of three dimensions: music listening behavior, music seeking behavior and the organization of personal music collection. The roles of classification in the whole music listening process can be identified as methods of personal music management, music seeking aids, triggers of music listening needs and expressions of listener’s psychological activity. Besides, this study analyzes descriptors of music lovers’ music dairies and 2,397 posts of online music community in order to discover potential facets of music classification schemes. To sum up, there are two main dimensions in music classification facets of data collected: “the inherent properties of music” and “interactive attributes of music.”
At the end, the comparative analysis of music classification facets and categories found that differences, similarities and relations between users’ classifications and taxonomy lays in “the linkage relations of classification facets” and “application functions of classification facets.”
Suggestions for taxonomies of online music databases and classifications of users’ personal music collections are proposed. Online music databases are supposed to provide “complete bibliographic descriptors of music” that can help users find specific music items. In addition, “multiple theme-based classifications” can also help users find non-specific music items and trigger potential music needs. Suggestions for organizing personal digital music collections include “labeling basic bibliographic data in the digital music files”, “making the best use of music classification facets’ subdivision properties to reduce the hierarchy of classification structures”, “flexible use of the temporary/other category”, “defining the meanings of language/region/country classification facets”, and “choosing a full-featured music organization software.”
Based on the limitations of this study, two suggestions were provided for further research – “research music taxonomies in a cross-discipline view” and “combine multi-approach to investigate concepts related to music classification.”
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:31:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R92126006-1.pdf: 5858887 bytes, checksum: 60fcb0506a9bf118e3c37ca8aa99cb84 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 ............................................................................................................................... i
Abstract .......................................................................................................................iii
目次 ............................................................................................................................... v
表次 ............................................................................................................................. vii
圖次 ............................................................................................................................viii
第壹章 緒論 ............................................................................................................... 1
第一節 問題陳述.................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的及研究問題................................................................................ 8
第三節 研究範圍及研究限制................................................................................ 9
第四節 名詞解釋.................................................................................................. 10
第貳章 文獻分析 ..................................................................................................... 13
第一節 分類架構相關概念之探討...................................................................... 13
第二節 音樂資訊行為實證研究.......................................................................... 40
第參章 研究設計與方法 ......................................................................................... 49
第一節 研究取向與研究架構.............................................................................. 49
第二節 研究實施.................................................................................................. 51
第三節 資料蒐集與分析—系統面...................................................................... 54
第四節 資料蒐集與分析—使用者面.................................................................. 59
第肆章 研究發現 ..................................................................................................... 75
第一節 線上音樂分類架構之現況...................................................................... 75
第二節 音樂愛好者音樂聆賞行為...................................................................... 88
第三節 音樂愛好者音樂資訊尋求行為............................................................ 106
第四節 音樂愛好者個人數位音樂組織行為.................................................... 125
第五節 音樂愛好者音樂描述構面.................................................................... 147
第六節 網路音樂社群音樂資訊尋求問答內容分析........................................ 174
第伍章 綜合討論 ................................................................................................... 211
第一節 音樂分類之角色定位析論.................................................................... 211
第二節 使用者分類與系統分類綜合析論........................................................ 219
第三節 研究發現與資訊行為相關研究析論.................................................... 230
第陸章 結論與建議 ............................................................................................... 235
第一節 結論........................................................................................................ 235
第二節 建議........................................................................................................ 240
第三節 後續研究建議........................................................................................ 244
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................... 247
附錄一 PTT音樂相關討論看板畫面.................................................................. 258
附錄二 音樂涉入程度調查表 ............................................................................... 260
附錄三 研究說明網站畫面 ................................................................................... 263
附錄四 邀約受訪者電子卡片 ............................................................................... 267
附錄五 音樂使用日誌撰寫說明及範例............................................................... 268
附錄六 訪談大綱 ................................................................................................... 269
附錄七 數位音樂空間檢視步驟 ........................................................................... 270
附錄八 使用者面資料匯入ATLAS TI.範例....................................................... 272
附錄九 譯碼表大綱圖示 ....................................................................................... 274
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title從使用者音樂聆賞歷程探討線上音樂分類架構zh_TW
dc.titleExploring User-oriented Taxonomy of Online Music Databases from Music Listening Processesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳美美,唐牧群,林奇秀
dc.subject.keyword音樂分類,音樂分類架構,音樂資訊行為,線上音樂資料庫,音樂資訊檢索系統,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordmusic classification,music classification scheme,music information behavior,online music database,music information retrieval (MIR) system,en
dc.relation.page279
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-08-19
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept圖書資訊學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:圖書資訊學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
5.72 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved