請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45521
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳羿貞(Yi-Jane Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chun Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃榆鈞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:24:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Pirttiniemi PM. Associations of mandibular and facial asymmetries--a review.[see comment]. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 1994;106:191-200.
2. Mulick JF. An investigation of craniofacial asymmetry using the serial twin-study method. American Journal of Orthodontics 1965;51:112-129. 3. Melnik AK. A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 1992;101:355-366. 4. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R, Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthodontist 2003;73:381-385. 5. Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Lee SH, Kwon TG, Park HS et al. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2006;35:43-48. 6. Fukushima K, Yasui K, Oatuka Y, Matsui S, Hirase N, Takayanagi J. Morphological characteristics of patients with jaw deformity -Frontal cepharometric evaluation of facial symmetry. Meikai Univ Dent J. 2003;32:118-123. 7. Tani M, Iketani M, Watanabe M, Suda S, Fujimura N, Miyazawa M. posterior–anterior cephalometric analysis in patients with dentofacial deformities. J Jpn Stomatol Soc 1989;35:1749-1759. 8. Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji Y, Muramatsu A, Yoshida K, Goto S et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 2006;102:382-390. 9. Woo T. On the asymmetry of the human skull. Biometrika 1931;22:324-352. 10. Edler R, Wertheim D, Greenhill D, Edler R, Wertheim D, Greenhill D. Outcome measurement in the correction of mandibular asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2004;125:435-443. 11. Park S-H, Yu H-S, Kim K-D, Lee K-J, Baik H-S. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2006;129:600.e623-634. 12. Habets LL, Bezuur JN, van Ooij CP, Hansson TL, Habets LL, Bezuur JN et al. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. I. The factor of vertical magnification. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1987;14:475-480. 13. Batenburg RH, Stellingsma K, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Batenburg RH, Stellingsma K et al. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 1997;84:430-435. 14. Larheim TA, Svanaes DB, Larheim TA, Svanaes DB. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 1986;90:45-51. 15. Xie Q, Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Mattila K, Gong M, Ainamo A et al. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology 1996;25:61-66. 16. Catic A, Celebic A, Valentic-Peruzovic M, Catovic A, Jerolimov V, Muretic I et al. Evaluation of the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs.[erratum appears in Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999 Jul;88(1):112 Note: Amir C [corrected to Catic, A]; Asja, C [corrected to Celebic, A]; Melita, VP [corrected to Valentic-Peruzovic, M]; Adnan, C [corrected to Catovic, A]; Vjekoslav, J [corrected to Jerolimov, V]]. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 1998;86:242-248. 17. Catic A, Celebic A, Valentic-Peruzovic M, Catovic A, Kuna T, Catic A et al. Dimensional measurements on the human dental panoramic radiographs. Collegium Antropologicum 1998;22 Suppl:139-145. 18. Obwegeser H. Mandibular growth anomalies: terminology, aetiology, diagnosis, treatment;. Berlin ; New York :: Springer, ; c2001. 19. Shah S, Joshi M. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthodontist 1978;48:141-148. 20. Vig P, Hewitt A. Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton. Angle Orthodontist 1975;45:125-129. 21. Masuoka N, Muramatsu A, Ariji Y, Nawa H, Goto S, Ariji E et al. Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007;131:609-613. 22. Hayashi K, Muguruma T, Hamaya M, Mizoguchi I, Hayashi K, Muguruma T et al. Morphologic characteristics of the dentition and palate in cases of skeletal asymmetry. Angle Orthodontist 2004;74:26-30. 23. Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y, Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. Angle Orthodontist 2002;72:28-35. 24. Forsberg CT, Burstone CJ, Hanley KJ, Forsberg CT, Burstone CJ, Hanley KJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of skeletal asymmetry with the submental-vertical radiograph. American Journal of Orthodontics 1984;85:224-237. 25. Grayson BH, LaBatto FA, Kolber AB, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, LaBatto FA et al. Basilar multiplane cephalometric analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics 1985;88:503-516. 26. Lew KK, Tay DK, Lew KK, Tay DK. Submentovertex cephalometric norms in male Chinese subjects. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 1993;103:247-252. 27. Uysal T, Malkoc S, Uysal T, Malkoc S. Submentovertex cephalometric norms in Turkish adults. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2005;128:724-730. 28. Williamson EH, Wilson CW, Williamson EH, Wilson CW. Use of a submental-vertex analysis for producing quality temporomandibular joint laminagraphs. American Journal of Orthodontics 1976;70:200-207. 29. Berger H. Problems and promises of basilar view cephalograms. Angle Orthodontist 1961;31:237-245. 30. Marmary Y, Zilberman Y, Mirsky Y, Marmary Y, Zilberman Y, Mirsky Y. Use of foramina spinosa to determine skull midlines. Angle Orthodontist 1979;49:263-268. 31. Kusayama M, Motohashi N, Kuroda T, Kusayama M, Motohashi N, Kuroda T. Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2003;123:329-337. 32. Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC, Hwang H-S, Hwang CH et al. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2006;130:779-785. 33. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB, Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE et al. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.[erratum appears in Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Sep;35(5):392]. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology 2006;35:219-226. 34. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G, Schulze D, Heiland M et al. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology 2004;33:83-86. 35. Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, Mishima A, Ishii H, Asada K et al. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2002;31:322-326. 36. Maini A, Durning P, Drage N, Maini A, Durning P, Drage N. Resorption: within or without? The benefit of cone-beam computed tomography when diagnosing a case of an internal/external resorption defect. British Dental Journal 2008;204:135-137. 37. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C, Lou L et al. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 2007;104:402-411. 38. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG, Ludlow JB et al. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 2007;103:534-542. 39. Sforza C PR, Grandi G, Ferronato G, Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional facial morphometry in skeletal Class III patients. A non-invasive study of soft-tissue changes before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:138-144. 40. Cevidanes LTJB, Scott F. Tucker, Martin A. Styner, Andre Mol, Ceib L. Phillips, William R. Proffit and Timothy Turvey. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007;131:44-50. 41. Proffit W, Fields H. Contemporary orthodontics 3rd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby; 2000. 42. Cohen JM, Cohen JM. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2005;128:157-160. 43. Visser H, Rodig T, Hermann KP, Visser H, Rodig T, Hermann KP. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthodontist 2001;71:159-163. 44. Jacobson A, Jacobson L. Radiographic cephalometry from basics to 3-D imaginf. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2006. 45. Davis DN, Mackay F, Davis DN, Mackay F. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods. British Journal of Orthodontics 1991;18:105-109. 46. Jackson PH, Dickson GC, Birnie DJ, Jackson PH, Dickson GC, Birnie DJ. Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report. British Journal of Orthodontics 1985;12:122-132. 47. Forsyth DB, Shaw WC, Richmond S, Forsyth DB, Shaw WC, Richmond S. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiography, Part 1: Advantages and limitations of digital imaging. Angle Orthodontist 1996;66:37-42. 48. Wenger NA, Tewson DH, McDonald F, Wenger NA, Tewson DHTK, McDonald F. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality. Medical Engineering & Physics 2006;28:560-567. 49. Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG, Geelen W et al. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique. European Journal of Orthodontics 1998;20:331-340. 50. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC, Chen YJ, Chen SK et al. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthodontist 2000;70:387-392. 51. Roden-Johnson D, English J, Gallerano R, Roden-Johnson D, English J, Gallerano R. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2008;133:556-564. 52. Huja S, Grubaugh E, Rummel A, Fields H, Beck F. Comparison of hard-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions. Angle Orthodontist 2009;79:428-435. 53. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM, Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology 2004;33:291-294. 54. Hwang HS, Youn IS, Lee KH, Lim HJ, Hwang H-S, Youn I-S et al. Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007;132:279.e271-276. 55. Houston WJ, Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 1983;83:382-390. 56. Athanasiou AE, Miethke R, Van Der Meij AJ, Athanasiou AE, Miethke R, Van Der Meij AJ. Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms. British Journal of Orthodontics 1999;26:273-284. 57. Lee KH, Hwang HS, Curry S, Boyd RL, Norris K, Baumrind S et al. Effect of cephalometer misalignment on calculations of facial asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007;132:15-27. 58. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S, Kragskov J, Bosch C et al. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 1997;34:111-116. 59. Swennen GRJ. Three-dimensional cephalometry. Berlin :: Springer; 2006. 60. Valeri CJ, Cole TM, 3rd, Lele S, Richtsmeier JT, Valeri CJ, Cole TM, 3rd et al. Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1998;107:113-124. 61. Vijverberg A, Hardin. Clustering Microarray Data. Pomona College Department of Mathematics 2007. 62. Huisinga-Fischer CE, Zonneveld FW, Vaandrager JM, Prahl-Andersen B, Huisinga-Fischer CE, Zonneveld FW et al. CT-based size and shape determination of the craniofacial skeleton: a new scoring system to assess bony deformities in hemifacial microsomia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2001;12:87-94. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45521 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:
顱顏面不對稱是一項咬合異常患者常見的特徵,嚴重的顏面不對稱可能需要正顎手術合併矯正治療才能予以改正。為了診斷不對稱發生的區域,傳統上,我們是用二維影像系統作為診斷工具,如側面測顱片或是前後向測顱片。由於最近錐狀射束斷層掃描影像(CBCT)的發展,我們可以更便利的得到三維立體影像,進而得到更多的診斷資訊。在本研究中,我們希望能在釐清CBCT系統中界標辨識的可重複性及測量的正確性,並試圖以新的分析方法來研究顱顏面不對稱的情況,並提出適切的分類方式。 實驗材料及方法: 本研究的第一部份主要是希望探討錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描和數位測顱片的準確度。首先利用電子游標尺在三個乾燥顱骨上測量17個線性測量值,同時將顱骨以三種不同的方式得到影像,分別為測顱片手繪測量、電腦軟體測量(Winceph 8.0)及三維影像測量(i-CAT/ Simplant Pro 12.02)。以真實測量值為黃金標準,計算各種方法的組內相關性,以釐清其測量值的可信度及影像之放大率。 第二部分則是分析臨床矯正患者的錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描三維影像,以評估顏面不對稱的情形。我們共收集33位患者之三維影像資料並分為兩組,Group 1為顏面較為對稱的患者,在正面測顱片上,其Gn與矢狀切線的距離小於4mm,而Group 2中的患者則是有較明顯的不對稱,且Gn的偏移量大於4mm。在三維影像的處理上,先定義正中矢狀切面的位置為經過ANS、Cg及Ba點之平面,而後在軟體(i-CAT/ Simplant Pro 12.02)中辨識出所選定的11個界標點,並記錄其座標;在三個不同的方向上,分別計算左右兩側座標值的差異;此外,我們也利用問卷的收集,評估不同專科經驗的醫師對顱顏面不對稱的判別情形。所採用的統計方法包括了二元迴歸分析及群聚分析法PAM群聚分析法(partition around medoids cluster analysis),進一步釐清顏面不對稱的各種不同表現情形。 結果: 在本研究中,比較真實值與三種不同影像來源所得到的線性測量結果,發現彼此都存在著極高的相關性,且達統計上的顯著性,其中又以CBCT所得到的相關係數最高,再者為軟體測量,最後則為手繪測量。 至於第二部份的研究,由迴歸分析所得到的結果,我們發現所選出的不對稱預測因子,包括有:△Hco、△Area 1、△Area 2、△APJr及△HCo-Go。而用群聚分析對患者不對稱的特徵進行分群,則發現可以分為五群。其中Cluster(5)-1是其中最為對稱的一組,而Cluster(5)-3、5則最為不對稱,但兩組擁有不同的特徵。Cluster(5)-2及4的不對稱情形則居中,其中Cluster(5)-2沒有明顯的代償現象,而在Cluster(5)-4則主要的不對稱因子是來自於下顎骨體的差異,但在其他項目上則有明顯的代償現象。而從問卷的結果得知,相較於牙科部實習醫師及齒顎矯正專科醫師,在矯正科受訓中的住院醫師傾向於更容易辨別出顏面不對稱,也可能以較嚴格標準進行顏面不對稱的判定,且更傾向於建議病人接受正顎手術的治療,此外,我們應用了GAM(generalized additive model)技術來協助鑑定不對稱的主觀判定閥值,發現本研究所採用的Gn偏移量4mm為一個適切的標準。而最終的迴歸模式分析結果,則得出建議接受正顎手術的相關預測因子包括有:下顎偏移量、醫師的經驗、群聚分析分類及上顎是否偏斜。 結論: 以真實值為基準,不論是用軟體測量(Winceph)或是CBCT的直接測量,我們都可以證實其間的高度相關性。以錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描三維影像評估齒顎矯正患者顏面不對稱的結果可知,本研究所提出的群聚分析法,是一個合適的分類法,有助於我們正確診斷各種表現不同的顏面不對稱並做出合適的治療計畫。 中文關鍵詞:錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描、顱顏面不對稱、測顱分析、三維影像、群集分析 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Craniofacial asymmetry is a common feature in human. Orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery would be suggested in some extreme cases. In the past, 2D images, such as posterioanterior cephalogram or panoramic film, were used as the diagnostic tools to determinate the asymmetric component in craniofacial area. Since the cone beam CT (CBCT) was developed, 3D image would be available in our daily practice. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the reproducibility of landmark identification and the reliability of measurement in CBCT. Next, we developed a screening strategy for analyzing different types of facial asymmetry.
Method: Part I, 17 linear dimensions of 3 dry skulls measured by digital caliper were used as gold standards. Hard copies of manual tracing, computer-aided digital measurements (Winceph 8.0) of both lateral and PA cephalograms, and 3D direct measurements in CBCT (i-CAT/ Simplant Pro 12.02) images were compared with the gold standards. Interclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability and magnification in different modalities. Part II. The CBCT data of 33 subjects was collected in this study and classified into 2 groups. The subjects in group 1 showed acceptable level of asymmetry and the amount of Gn deviation to midsagittal line was less than 4mm in frontal cephalogram. Those in group 2 showed obvious asymmetry with Gn deviation more than 4mm. In 3D dataset, the midsagittal plane was determinated as the plane passing ANS, Cg and Ba. Other 11 landmarks were identified and their coordinates were recorded. The differences of the distances between landmarks to reference plane bilaterally were calculated in 3 dimensions. Questionnaire was used to evaluate the subjective opinion of orthodontist at different training levels. Binary regression analysis and cluster analysis (PAM) were used for statistical analyses. Result: Part I, three modalities in our study all showed statistically significant correlation with gold standard. However, the highest one was CBCT, and manual tracing was the least. Part II, binary regression model showed that the predictors for grouping of facial asymmetry included △HCo, △Area 1, △Area 2, APJr and △HCo-Go. In cluster analysis, all subjects were classified into 5 clusters. The most symmetric cases were grouped into cluster (5)-1. The cluster(5)- 3 and cluster(5)- 5 were obvious asymmetric cases with different characteristics. The severity of asymmetry was moderate in cluster(5)-2 without obvious compensated components. In cluster(5)- 4, the major asymmetric component was the difference of area 2, but other variables compensated the manifestation of asymmetry. In the result of questionnaire, the residents in orthodontic department showed higher tendency than specialists and interns in identifying facial asymmetry and suggesting patients to receive orthognathic surgery. On the other hand, GAM proved the 4mm deviation of Gn as a proper threshold to identify the facial asymmetry for its adequacy. Moreover, according to the binary regression model, the factors responsible for the suggestion of orthognathic surgery included the amount of chin deviation, training level of doctors, clustering category and the presence of maxillary canting. Conclusion: The reliability of measurement in Winceph system and in CBCT had high correlation with virtual value. The cluster analysis could be applied to classify the patients with facial asymmetry for diagnosis and treatment planning. Key words: cone bean computed tomography, craniofacial asymmetry, cephalometric analysis, 3D image, cluster analysis | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:24:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95422023-1.pdf: 2610038 bytes, checksum: c0711fbad33040f92635f2924eeda240 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 顱顏發育之不對稱 2 1.2.1顱顏發育不對稱之綜論 2 1.2.2 顱顏面不對稱之診斷 2 一、外觀影像 3 二、側面測顱片 3 三、環口X光攝影 4 四、正面測顱片 4 五、Submentovertex測顱片 5 六、使用三維影像 6 1.3 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描儀 7 1.3.1 現今市面上可見之錐狀射束斷層掃描儀 7 1.3.2 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描技術的發展對於矯正學的影響 8 一、輻射劑量的考量 8 二、臨床應用與近期研究 9 1.4醫學影像之準確性探討 10 1.4.1測顱分析在齒顎矯正診斷上之應用 10 1.4.2 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描於臨床應用上之準確性 14 1.5研究目的 15 第二章 研究材料與方法 16 2.1錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描、數位測顱片之手繪測量與電腦軟體測量的線性測量正確性之比較 16 2.1.1研究樣本 16 2.1.2研究樣本置備 16 2.1.3 測量方式及工具 18 2.2利用三維影像分析顱顏面不對稱之情形 21 2.2.1研究對象 21 2.2.2研究材料製備 21 2.2.2.1正面測顱影像 21 2.2.2.2 分組 21 2.2.2.3 三維影像資料之取得 22 2.2.2.4 觀察者誤差(Intraobserver error) 24 2.2.2.5外觀照片分析及問卷調查統計 25 2.2.2.6統計分析 25 第三章 結果 28 3.1 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描、數位測顱片之手繪測量與電腦軟體(Winceph)測量於線性測量上之比較 28 3.1.1 線性測量值正確性之比較 28 3.1.2 影像放大率 29 3.2利用三維影像分析顱顏面不對稱之情形 30 3.2.1 界標判定之觀察者組內誤差 30 3.2.2 顱顏面不對稱之迴歸分析模型 30 3.2.3 群集分析 31 3.2.4 問卷結果分析 32 3.2.4.1 卡方分析 32 3.2.4.2不同經驗醫師對是否需接受正顎手術治療判定結果之迴歸分析模型 32 第四章 討論 34 4.1錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描測顱分析、數位測顱片之手繪測量與電腦軟體測量之比較 34 4.1.1線性測量值正確性之比較 34 4.1.2影像放大率之探討 35 4.2利用三維影像分析顱顏面不對稱之情形 36 4.2.1 正中矢狀平面之定義 37 4.2.2 界標判定之觀察者組內誤差 39 4.2.3 顱顏面不對稱之迴歸分析模型 42 4.2.4 群集分析 44 4.2.5 問卷結果分析 46 第五章 結論 49 第六章 未來展望 50 參考文獻 86 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用錐狀射束斷層掃描分析顱顏面不對稱情形 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Application of cone bean computed tomography to analyze craniofacial asymmetry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姚宗珍,張宏博 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描,顱顏面不對稱,測顱分析,三維影像,群集分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cone bean computed tomography,craniofacial asymmetry,cephalometric analysis,3D image,cluster analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 91 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 牙醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。