請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45347完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Teng-Ming Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李登明 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:15:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-02-26 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-01-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-01-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.伍忠賢(2006)。鴻海藍圖－鴻海集團沒寫出來的功夫。台北市：五南圖書。
2.李明軒(2002)。威盛打贏快吃慢的戰爭。天下雜誌，245，74-76。 3.吳昭怡(2006)。2006標竿企業PART 1-力用全球。天下雜誌，357，152-182。 4.威盛電子官方網站http://www.viatech.com.tw/tw/index.jsp 5.高長、陳威如(1998)。台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素分析，管理學報，15(3)，393-418。 6.徐明天(2008)。郭台銘與富士康。台北市：馥林文化。 7.康信鴻、廖婉孜(2006)。影響台商赴大陸投資額與投資區位因素之實證研究，26(1)，15-38。 8.張戌誼，張殿文(2002)。三千億傳奇－郭台銘的鴻海帝國。台北市：天下雜誌。 9.張戌誼，張殿文(2005)。五千億傳奇－郭台銘的鴻海帝國。台北市：天下雜誌。 10.麥建陸(2006)。與龍共舞－十億顧客的商機與挑戰。台北市：天下雜誌。 11.郭晉彰(2000)。不停駛的驛馬－聯強國際的通路霸業。台北市：商訊。 12.郭晉彰(2006)。3%的超越－透視杜書伍的聯強國際經營學。台北市：天下文化。 13.陳修賢、王家英(2008)。CEO開講－統一超商總經理徐重仁：無私撐出大格局。哈佛商業評論，21，79-85。 14.統一超商官方網站http://www.7-11.com.tw/ 15.程永明(2002)。中國大陸市場進入模式權變模型建構之研究─臺灣製造業之實證分析，國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版，台南市。 16.華強森(2003)。麥肯錫中國投資報告。台北市，時報文化。 17.經濟部投資審議委員會(2001)。大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告。台北市：經濟部。 18.劉震濤、楊君苗(2006)。台商企業的中國經驗。台北市：培生教育。 19.盧昭燕(2008)。虛實整合，掀通路革命。天下雜誌，392，130-133。 20.顏和正(2001)。IC設計業－以30％成長率衝刺未來。天下雜誌，242，56-58。 21.鴻海科技集團官方網站http://www.foxconn.com.tw/ 22.聯強e城市http://www.synnex.com.tw/ 23.顧朝林(2002)。經濟全球化與中國城市發展。台北市：台灣商務。 1.Agarwal, S. and Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). 'Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and International Factors.' Journal of International Business Studies 23(1): 1-27. 2.Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). 'Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent.' Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33-46. 3.Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986). 'Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions.' Journal of International Business Studies 17(3): 1-26. 4.Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978). 'Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.' Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. 5.Barney, J. (1991). 'Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.' Journal of Management, Sage Publications, Ltd. 17: 99. 6.Baum, J. A. C., Li, S. X. and Usher, J. M. (2000). 'Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains’ Acquisitions.' Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 766-801. 7.Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R. and Phillips, D. J. (2004). 'Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection.' Organization Science 15: 259-275. 8.Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L. (2003). 'Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited.' Academy of Management Review 2: 238-256. 9.Berman and Barry. (1996). 'Marketing Channels.' Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 10.Brewer, P. (2001). 'International Market Selection: Developing A Model from Australian Case Studies.' International Business Review 10: 155. 11.Brush, T.H. and Maritan, C.A. (1999).'The Plant Location Decision in Multinational Manufacturing Firms: An Empirical Analysis of International Business and Manufacturing Strategy Perspectives.' Production and Operations Management 8(2): 109-132. 12.Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1976). 'The Future of the Multinational Enterprise.'London, MacMillan. 13.Buckley and Casson. (1981). 'The Optimal Timming of a Foreign Direct Investment.' The Economic Journal, May: 34-50. 14.Caves, R. E.(1971). 'The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment.' Economica 38. 15.Chen, H. and Chen, T. J. (1998). 'Foreign Direct Investment as A Strategic Linkage.' Thunderbird International Business Review 40(1): 13-30. 16.Chen, H. and Chen, T. J. (1998). 'Network Linkage and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment.' Journal of International Business Studies 29(3): 445-468. 17.Cheng, S. (2007). 'Structure of Firm Location Choices: An Examination of Japanese Greenfield Investment in China.' Asian Economic Journal, Blackwell Publishing Limited. 21: 47-73. 18.Chuan, C. (2008). 'Entry Mode Selection for International Construction Markets: The Influence of Host Country Related Factors.' Construction Management & Economics, Routledge. 26: 303-314. 19.Claver, E. and Quer, D. (2005). 'Choice of Market Entry Mode in China: The Influence of Firm-Specific Factors.' Journal of General Management 30(3): 51-70. 20.Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). 'Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.' Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152. 21.Collis, D. J. (1991). 'A Resource-Based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings Industry.' Strategic Management Journal 12: 49-68. 22.Deng, P. (2004).'Outward Investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and Implications.' Business Horizons 47(3): 8-16. 23.Deng, P. (2007). 'Investing for Strategic Resources and its Rationale: The Case of Outward FDI from Chinese Companies.' Business Horizons 50(1): 71-81. 24.Deng, P. (2009). 'Why Do Chinese Firms Tend to Acquire Strategic Assets in International Expansion?' Journal of World Business 44: 74-84. 25.Delios, A. and Beamish, P.W. (1999). 'Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional and experience influences.' Strategic Management Journal 20(10): 915-933. 26.Dodgson, M. (1993). 'Learning, Trust and Technological Collaboration.' Human Relations 46(1): 77-95. 27.Dikova, D. and Witteloostuijn, A.V. (2007). 'Foreign Direct Investment Mode Choice: Entry and Establishment Modes in Transition Economies.' Journal of International Business Studies 38: 1013-1033. 28.Dunning, J. H. (1980). 'Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests.' Journal of International Business Studies 11(1): 9-31. 29.Dunning, J. H. (1988). 'The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions.' Journal of International Business Studies 19(1): 1-31. 30.Dunning, J.H. (1993). 'Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy.'Addison Wesley: Reading, MA. 31.Enright, M. J. (2000). 'Regional Clusters and Multinational Enterprises.' International Studies of Management & Organization, M.E. Sharpe Inc. 30: 114. 32.Enright, M. J. and Subramanian, V. (2007). 'An Organizing Framework for MNC Subsidiary Typologies.' Management International Review 47(6): 895-924. 33.Erramilli, M. K. and Rao, C. P. (1993). 'Service Firms' International Entry-Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach.' Journal of Marketing, American Marketing Association. 57: 19. 34.Ferdows, K. (1997). 'Making the Most of Foreign Factories.' Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publication Corp. 75: 73-88. 35.Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J and Lien, Y.H. (2007).'FDI by Firms from Newly Industrialised Economies in Emerging Markets: Corporate Governance, Entry Mode and Location.' Journal of International Business Studies 38: 556-572. 36.Fiol, C.M. and Lyles, M. (1985). 'Organizational Learning.' Acadamy of Management Review 10(4): 803-813. 37.Gallon, M. R. and Stillman, H. M. (1995). 'Putting Core Competency Thinking into Practice.' Research Technology Management 38(3): 20. 38.Grant, R. M. (1991). 'The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation.' California Management Review 33(3): 114-135. 39.Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. and Shalley, C. E. (2006).'The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation.' Academy of Management Journal 49: 693-706. 40.Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1993).'Strategy as Stretch and Leverage.' Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publication Corp. 71: 75-84. 41.Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. H. (1984). 'Structural inertia and organizational change.' American Sociological Review 49: 149-164. 42.He, Z. L. and P. K. Wong. (2004). 'Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.' Organization Science 15: 481-494. 43.Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. and Kim, W. C. (1990). 'An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode.' Strategic Management Journal 11(2): 117-128. 44.Hillman, A. J. and M. A. Hitt. (1999). 'Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions.' Academy of Management Review24: 825-842. 45.Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T. and Levitas, E., Arregle,J. L., Borza, A. (2000). 'Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives.' Academy of Management Journal 43: 449-467. 46.Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M. and Wright, M. (2000). 'Strategy in Emerging Economies.' The Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 249-267. 47.Hu, Y.-s. (1995). 'The International Transferability of the Firm's Advantages.' California Management Review 37: 73-88. 48.Junjie, H. (2007). 'Firm-specific Effects on Location Decisions of Foreign Direct Investment in China's Logistics Industry.' Regional Studies, Routledge. 41: 673-683. 49.Kim, W. C. and Hwang, P. (1992). 'Global Strategy and Multinationals’ Entry Mode Choice. ' Journal of International Business Studies 23(1): 29-53. 50.King, A. W. and Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). 'Competencies and Firm Performance：Examining the Causal Ambiguity Paradox.' Strategic Management Journal 22: 75. 51.Kogut and Singh. (1988). 'The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry mode.' Journal of International Business Studies (Fall): 411-432. 52.Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993). 'Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation.' Journal of International Business Studies 24: 625-646. 53.Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G. and Wright, P. (1992). 'A Competency-Based Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Toward a Conceptual Integration.' Journal of Management, Sage Publications, Ltd. 18: 77. 54.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). 'Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.' Strategic Management Journal 13: 111-125. 55.Luo, Y. (2000). 'Dynamic Capabilities In International Expansion.' Journal of World Business, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. 35: 355. 56.Luo, Y. (2001). 'Determinants of Entry In An Emerging Economy：A Multilevel Approach.' Journal of Management Studies, Blackwell Publishing Limited. 38: 443-472. 57.Luo, Y. (2001). 'Determinants of Local Responsiveness: Perspectives from Foreign Subsidiaries in An Emerging Market.' Journal of Management, Sage Publications, Ltd. 27: 451-477. 58.Luo, Y. (2002). 'Capability Exploitation and Building in a Foreign Market: Implications for Multinational Enterprises.' Organization Science 13(1): 48-63. 59.Madhok, A. (1997). 'Cost, Value and Foreign Market Entry Mode: The Transaction and the Firm.' Strategic Management Journal 18: 39-16. 60.March, J. G. (1991). 'Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.' Organization Science 2(1): 71-87. 61.Markides, C. C. and Williamson, P. J. (1994). 'Related Diversification, Core Competencies and Corporate Performance.' Strategic Management Journal 15: 149-165. 62.Makino, S. and Neupert, K. E. (2000). 'National Culture, Transaction Costs, and the Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary.' Journal of International Business Studies 31(4): 705-713. 63.McWilliams, A. and Fleet, D. D. V. (2002). 'Raising Rivals’ Costs Through Political Strategy: An Extension of Resource-Based Theory.' Journal of Management Studies 39: 707-724. 64.Meyer, K. E. and Nguyen, H. V. (2005). 'Foreign Investment Strategies and Sub-national Institutions in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Vietnam.'Journal of Management Studies, Blackwell Publishing Limited. 42: 63-93. 65.Pan, Y.G. and Tse, D. K. (2000). 'The hierarchical model of market entry modes.' Journal of International Business Studies 31(4), 535-554. 66.Peng, M. W. (2001). 'The Resource-Based View and International Business.' Journal of Management, Sage Publications, Ltd. 27: 803. 67.Penrose, E.T. (1959). 'The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.' John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY. 68.Peteraf, M. A. (1993). 'The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View.' Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179-191. 69.Porter, M. E. (1985). 'Competitive Advantage.' New York: Free Press. 70.Porter, M. E. (1990). 'The Competitive Advantage of Nations.' New York: Free Press. 71.Porter, M. E. (2000). 'Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy.' Economic Development Quarterly 14(1): 15-34. 72.Powell, W. W. (1998). 'Learning From Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries.' California Management Review 40: 228-240. 73.Prahalad, C.K. and Doz, Y. L. (1987). 'The Multinational Mission.' New York: Free Press. 74.Rumelt, R. P. (1974). 'Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance.' Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 75.Root, F. (1990). 'International investment and trade.' Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern. 76.Root, F. (1994). 'Entry Strategies for International Markets.' New York: Lexington Books. 77.Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). 'Incumbent’s Advantage Through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation.' Strategic Management Journal 22: 687-699. 78.Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L. and Christensen, H. K. (2001).'The Resource-Based View and Marketing: The Role of Market-based Assets in Gaining Competitive advantage.' Journal of Management, Sage Publications, Ltd. 27: 777. 79.Tseng, C. H. and Tansuhaj, P. (2007). 'Effects of Firm Resources on Growth in Mulinationality.' Journal of International Business Studies 38: 961-974. 80.Vermeulen, F. and Barkema, H. (2001). 'Learning through acquisitions.' Academy of Management Journal, 44: 457-478. 81.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). 'A Resource-Based View of the Firm.' Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180. 82.Wan, W. P. (2005).'Country Resource Environments, Firm Capabilities, and Corporate Diversification Strategies.' Journal of Management Studies 42(1): 161-182. 83.Yadong, L. (1998).'Strategic Traits of Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Country of Origin Perspective.' Management International Review 38: 109-132. 84.Yadong, L. (1998). 'Industry Attractiveness, Firm Compentence, and International Investment Performance In A Transitional Economy.' Bulletin of Economic Research 50(1): 73. 85.Yigang, P. and Tse, D. K. (2000). 'The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes.' Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 31: 535-554. 86.Zhan, W. and Luo, Y. (2008). 'Performance Implications of Capability Exploitation and Upgrading in International Joint Ventures.' Management International Review 48(2): 227-253. 87.Zhao, H. and Zhu, G. (2000).'Location Factors and Country-of-Origin Differences: An Empirical Analysis of FDI in China.' Multinational Business Review, St. Louis University. 8: 60. 88.Zhou, C., Delios, A. and Yang, J. Y. (2002). 'Locational Determinants of Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in China.'Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19: 63-86. 89.Zitta, S. J. and Power, T.L. (2003). 'Motives for Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.' Thunderbird International Business Review 45(3): 275-288. 90.Zou, H. and Ghauri, P. N. (2008). 'Learning through International Acquisitions: The Process of Knowledge Acquisition in China.' Management International Review 48(2): 207-226. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45347 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究根據過去對外投資的相關文獻與組織學習理論，發展出由「市場定位」與「能力屬性」組成的矩陣模型，透過這兩個維度，將台商的佈局模式分成（一）製造部落、（二）服務驛站、（三）品牌市集和（四）研發堡壘四種類型；再搭配資源基礎理論、折衷理論，提出由能耐基石、佈局意圖與佈局戰略三大構面組成的策略櫥窗。第一個構面主要以核心能力作為衡量企業資源整合的指標，而第二個構面，則是從策略觀點和投資動機來分析公司投資的目的；最後一個構面，再分別從進入模式、區位選擇和分佈特徵來探討執行層面的做法。此外，本研究透過個案研究的方式，驗證鴻海、聯強國際、統一超商和威盛電子四家知名企業在每一個變數上的關鍵成功因素，以使分析架構更具實務上的參考價值。
研究結果顯示，製造部落在能耐基石上要具備生產製造的核心能力；在佈局意圖的部分，則著重在全球整合的策略觀點，其前往大陸的投資動機主要是尋求資源與效率；而佈局戰略的做法，應採取獨資的進入模式，並以成本和運輸導向作為區位選擇的條件，呈現出環狀衛星的分佈特徵。服務驛站和品牌市集在能耐基石上皆應有行銷服務的核心能力；在佈局意圖上，同樣也都需具備地區回應的策略觀點，但前者是將大陸視為市場與效率的主要來源，而後者的投資動機則是尋求市場與策略性資產；在佈局戰略的部分，服務驛站是採獨資經營的進入模式，以運輸和市場導向來選擇區位，並呈現遍地開花的分佈特徵，而品牌市集則是透過合資的進入模式，選擇符合運輸和市場導向的區位，並以T型佈點的方式來分佈。研發堡壘在能耐基石上要有研發設計的核心能力；在佈局意圖的部分，適合多元集中的策略觀點，並以尋求資源和策略性資產做為投資大陸的動機；而佈局戰略則是以獨資的進入模式，將技術導向當成區位選擇的標準，形成點狀橋接的分佈特徵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the rapidly growing of Mainland China, foreign direct investment in China has become the main economic activity for Taiwanese firms recently. Since Taiwanese firms tend to develop into more diversification-oriented and larger-scaled enterprises, the motivation and resource conditions of enterprises will have definite influence on the investment configuration. Therefore, based on the characteristic of different industries, it is a significant issue for Taiwanese firms to know how to choose the most appropriate strategy which can lead to a competitive advantage.
According to foreign investment literature and organizational learning theory, this study develops a matrix with two strategic dimensions : market position and capability attribute. From this two dimensions, the investment configuration of Taiwanese firms can be divided into four types : (1) OEM Tribe, (2) Service Post, (3) Brand Market and (4) R&D Fort. Besides, based on resource-based and eclectic theory, this research proposes a strategic window combined with three constructs, which are “competence cornerstone”, “configuration intention” and “configuration tactic”. At the first construct, core competence is the major criterion for evaluating resource integration of firms. In order to analyze the investment purpose of enterprise, strategic viewpoint and investment motivation are selected in the second construct. For the last construct, entry mode, location choice and scattering characteristic are used to describe the execution behavior. Besides, this research uses the case study method to justify the key successful factors of renowned enterprises in different criteria and makes the analytical framework more practical. The research concludes that different types of Taiwanese firms not only enhance their core competence, but reposition their roles in each value chain with global thinking. In order to avoid chasing short-term profitability which may lead to losing operational control, enterprises have to evaluate the risks and benefits between sole venture and joint venture. Then, based on the policy of each local government, Taiwanese firms can select the locations which are most value-added, so as to increase the probability of successful investment in China. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:15:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96741012-1.pdf: 1604145 bytes, checksum: d4785ccfb35d3915512af71fd4b8a19b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ⅰ
中文摘要 ⅱ 英文摘要 ⅲ 目錄 ⅴ 圖目錄 ⅶ 表目錄 ⅷ 第一章、緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章、文獻探討 4 第一節 對外投資相關研究方向 4 第二節 相關理論 11 第三章、研究架構與方法 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 變數衡量 22 第三節 資料收集與分析 27 第四節 個案簡介 27 第四章、研究結果 33 第一節 製造部落－鴻海科技集團 33 第二節 服務驛站－聯強國際 38 第三節 品牌市集－統一超商 42 第四節 研發堡壘－威盛電子 47 第五節 綜合比較 51 第五章 結論與建議 55 第一節 研究結論 55 第二節 研究貢獻 56 第三節 管理意涵 56 第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 57 參考文獻 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 台商投資大陸佈局類型與分析－組織學習、資源基礎與折衷理論觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Typology and Analysis of Foreign Investment Configuration of Taiwanese Firms in China－Organizational Learning, Resource-Based and Eclectic Theory Perspectives | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳忠仁 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃怡芬,白?芸 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 對外直接投資,策略佈局,核心能力,進入模式,區位選擇, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Foreign Direct Investment,Strategic Configuration,Core Competence, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-01-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。