請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45276
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇永成 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-E Shih | en |
dc.contributor.author | 石純娥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:11:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-02-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-01-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1988, “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability.” Review of Financial Studies 1, 3-40.
2. Ahn, S., Denis, D.J., 2004, “Internal capital markets and investment policy: evidence from corporate spinoffs.” Journal of Financial Economics 71, 489-516. 3. Aitken, M., P. Brown. H.Y. Izan and A. Kua, 1995, “An Intraday Analysis of the Probability of Trading on the ASX at the Asking Price.” Australian Journal of Management, 20, 116-154. 4. Allen, J., Lummer, S., McConnell, J., Reed, D., 1995. “Can takeover losses explain spin-off gains?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 465-485. 5. Barclay, M. and J. Warner, 1993, “Stealth Trading and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics 34, 281-305. 6. Barber, Brad M., and Terrance Odean, 2000, Trading is hazardous to your health: The common stock investment performance of individual investors, Journal of Finance 55,773-806. 7. Barclay, M. J., T. Hendershott and D. T. Mccormick, 2003, “Competition Among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks.” Journal of Finance 58, 2637-2666. 8. Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard Thaler, 2001, “Naïve diversification strategies in retirement saving plans.” American Economic Review 91, 79-98. 9. Bollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 31, 307-327. 10. Burch, T.R., Nanda V., 2003, “Divisional diversity and the conglomerate discount: evidence from spinoffs.” Journal of financial Economics 70, 69-98. 11. Chakravarty, S., 2001, “Stealth-trading: Which Traders’ Trades Move Stock Prices?” Journal of Financial Economics 61, 289-307. 12. Chan, Fong, 2000, “Trade Size, Order Imbalance, and Volatility-Volume Relation” Journal of Financial Economics 57, 247-273. 13. Chau, M., 2004, “Market-Making when Traders Follow Dynamic Order Placement Strategies.” Working Paper, 1-39. 14. Chordia, T. and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalance and Individual Stock Returns: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics 72, 485-518. 15. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2002, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics 65, 111-130. 16. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2005, “Evidence on the Speed of Convergence to Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 76, 271-292. 17. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2006, “Liquidity and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 87, 249-268. 18. Copeland, T. E., 1976, “A model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival.” Journal of Finance 31, 1149-1168. 19. Cornell, Bradford and Richard Roll, 1981, “Strategies for pairwise competitions in markets and organizations.” Bell Journal of Economics 12, 201-213. 20. Cusatis, P.J., Miles, J.A., Woolridge, J.R., 1993. “Restructuring through spin-offs: the stock market evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics 33, 293-311. 21. Daley, L., Mehrotra, V., Sivakumar, R., 1997. “Corporate focus and value creation: evidence from spin-offs.” Journal of Financial Economics 45, 257-281. 22. Desai, H., Jain, P.C., 1999, “Firm performance and focus: long-run stock market performance following spin-offs.” Journal of Financial Economics 54, 75-101. 23. Epps, Thomas W., 1979, “Comovements in stock prices in the very short run.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 291-298. 24. Fama, Eugene F., 1970, “Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work.” Journal of Finance 25, 383-417. 25. Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1994, “Strategic Trading with Asymmetric Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, 499-518. 26. Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1996, “Strategic Trading When Agents Forecast the Forecasts of Others.” Journal of Finance 51, 1437-1478. 27. Grossman, S., 1975, “On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets where Trades Have Diverse Information.” Journal of Finance 31(2), 573-608. 28. Grossman, Sanford J. and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1980, “On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets.” American Economic Review 70, 393-408. 29. Hite, G., Owers, J.E., 1983, “Security price reactions around corporate spin-off announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics 12, 409-436. 30. Holden, C. W., and A. Subrahmanyam 1992, “Long-lived private information and imperfect competition.” Journal of Finance 47, 247-270. 31. Hong, H., and J. Wang, 2000, “Trading and Returns under Periodic Market Closures.” Journal of Finance 55, 297-354. 32. Huson, M.R., MacKinnon G., 2003, “Corporate spinoffs and information asymmetry between investors” Journal of Corporate Finance 9, 481-503. 33. Karpoff, J., 1987, “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 109-126. 34. Krishnaswami, S., Subramaniam, V., 1999, “Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision” Journal of financial Economics 53, 73-112 35. Kyle, A., 1985, “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica 53, 1315-1335 36. Lamoureux, C., and W. Lastrapes, 1990, “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects.” Journal of Finance 45, 221-229. 37. Lee, M. C., and Ready, M. J., 1991, “Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data,” Journal of Finance 46, 733-746. 38. Lee, Y. T., Y.J. Liu, R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalances and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, 327-343. 39. Llorente, G., R. Michaely, G. Saar, and J. Wang, 2002, “Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks.” Review of Financial Studies 15, 1005-1047. 40. Maxwell, W.F., Rao, R.P., 2003, “Do spin-offs expropriate wealth from bondholders?” Journal of Finance 5, 2087-2108. 41. Miles, J., Rosenfeld, J., 1983. “The effect of voluntary spin-off announcements on shareholder wealth.” Journal of Finance 38, 1597-1606. 42. Schipper, K., Smith, A., 1983, “Effects of recontracting on shareholder wealth: the case of voluntary spin-offs.” Journal of Financial Economics 12, 437-467. 43. Slovin, M.B., Sushka, M.E., Ferraro, S.R., 1995, “A comparison of the information conveyed by equity carve-out, spin-offs, and asset sell-offs.” Journal of Financial Economics 37, 89-104. 44. Wang, F. A., 1998, “Strategic Trading, Asymmetric Information and Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs,” Journal of Financial Markets 1,321-352. 45. Wang, J., 1993, “A Model of Intertemporal Asset Prices under Asymmetric Information,” Review of Economic Studies 60, 249-282. 46. Wang, J., 1994, “A Model of Competitive Stock Trading Volume,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 127-168. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45276 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 許多研究指出企業分封宣告時所釋放出之訊息可能可以減緩抑或是加深資訊不對稱之問題,更甚而會在企業分封之宣告日期間產生異常報酬。換言之,由於資訊不對稱的存在使得投資人可藉由觀察交易量來了解持有私有資訊者之交易行為與資訊。而本研究之目的在於以買賣單不對稱變數作為交易資訊的指標進而研究企業分封宣告日當天母公司日內股票報酬、波動性與買賣單不對稱之關係。
首先,我們藉由時間序列迴歸模型檢測同期與前期之買賣單不對稱對於日內股票價格之影響。實證結果指出前期之買賣單不對稱對於當期股票報酬並不存在顯著之正向影響,亦即為我們並無法利用前期買賣單不對稱之變數去預測當期之股票報酬。然而,我們發現同期之買賣單不對稱對於同期股票報酬具有顯著之正向影響。 接著,我們利用波動性-買賣單不對稱GARCH(1,1)模型檢驗是否買賣單不對稱愈大會造成股價波動性愈大,亦即買賣單不對稱是否對股價波動性的影響為正向關係。實證結果指出買賣單不對稱與股價波動性並無存在顯著正向或負向關係;我們推論這是由於造市者(Market maker)擁有良好穩定股票價格之能力。此外,我們發現取對數後之資本額對於買賣單不對稱變數有顯著之負向影響,顯示在本研究樣本中存在小型股效應。 最後,我們以買賣單不對稱變數建立一套以報價價格與交易價格為基礎之交易策略。結果顯示僅有5分鐘時間區間下之交易策略報酬可以擊敗大盤報酬。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Several researches indicate that spinoff event can alleviate or exacerbated the information asymmetry problem by revealing information and even yield abnormal excess returns around the announcement periods. In other words, investors can know the private information and behavior of informed traders by observing trading volume because of information asymmetry. The central purpose of our study is using the order imbalance as an indicator of the trading information to investigate the relation among the intraday stock return, volatility and order imbalances at announcement date of spinoff’s parent firms.
First, we examine the intraday current stock price reaction to the lagged order imbalances by time-series regression models. The empirical results provide no significantly positive relation between current stock returns and lagged order imbalances; that is, we deduce that lagged order imbalances have no predictive explanatory power to current returns. However, we observe that contemporaneous returns are positively associated with contemporaneous order imbalances by performing another multiple regression model with contemporaneous and four-lag of order imbalance. Next, we use the volatility-order imbalance GARCH(1,1) model to examine whether the larger order imbalance lead to the larger volatility of stock price. The empirical study indicates no strongly positive and negative relation between stock price volatility and order imbalances. We infer that market maker has greater control power to stabilize market price. In addition, we find logged market capitalization is negatively significant related to order imbalance. It implies the existence of small firm effect in our study. Finally, we form the order imbalance-based trading strategies with basis of quote price and trading price. We only find that the returns on trading strategies for 5 minutes time interval can beat the open-to-close returns. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:11:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96723052-1.pdf: 1256315 bytes, checksum: 4f90863081a27068abe974ef8a494dfe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 MOTIVES AND PURPOSES 1 1.2 FRAMEWORK OF THE THESIS 9 CHAPTER 2 DATA 10 2.1 DATA SOURCES 10 2.2 DATA PROCESSING METHODS 10 2. 3 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 13 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 14 3.1 UNCONDITIONAL LAGGED RETURN-ORDER IMBALANCE OLS MODEL 14 3.2 CONDITIONAL CONTEMPORANEOUS RETURN-ORDER IMBALANCE OLS MODEL 15 3.3 DYNAMIC VOLATILITY-ORDER IMBALANCE GARCH (1, 1) MODEL 16 3.4 SMALL FIRM EFFECT 17 CHAPTER 4 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 19 4.1 UNCONDITIONAL LAGGED RETURN-ORDER IMBALANCE OLS MODEL 19 4.2 CONDITIONAL CONTEMPORANEOUS RETURN-ORDER IMBALANCE OLS MODEL 21 4.3 DYNAMIC VOLATILITY-ORDER IMBALANCE GARCH (1, 1) MODEL 24 4.4 SMALL FIRM EFFECT 25 4.6 TRADING STRATEGY 26 4.6.1 Trading strategy under the basis of quote price 26 4.6.2 Trading strategy under the basis of trading price 28 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 31 REFERENCES 34 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 企業分封報酬、波動性與買賣單不對稱之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Spin-off Return, Volatility, and Order Imbalance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃漢青,胡星陽 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 買賣單不對稱, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Order Imbalance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 89 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-01-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。