請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45142
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張靜文(Ching-Wen Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ling-Wen Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂聆文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:06:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.Aksozek A, McClellan K, Howard K, Niederkorn JY & Alizadeh H (2002) Resistance of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts to physical, chemical, and radiological conditions. J Parasitol 88: 621-623.
2.Allen PG & Dawidowicz EA (1990) Phagocytosis in Acanthamoeba: I. A mannose receptor is responsible for the binding and phagocytosis of yeast. J Cell Physiol 145: 508-513. 3.Bae S & Wuertz S (2009) Discrimination of viable and dead fecal Bacteroidales bacteria by quantitative PCR with propidium monoazide. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2940-2944. 4.Banning N, Toze S & Mee BJ (2002) Escherichia coli survival in groundwater and effluent measured using a combination of propidium iodide and the green fluorescent protein. J Appl Microbiol 93: 69-76. 5.Barer MR, Smith RJ, Cooney RP & Kimmitt PT (2000) Relationships between culturability, activity and virulence in pathogenic bacteria. J Infect Chemother 6: 108-111. 6.Beattie TK, Seal DV, Tomlinson A, McFadyen AK & Grimason AM (2003) Determination of amoebicidal activities of multipurpose contact lens solutions by using a most probable number enumeration technique. J Clin Microbiol 41: 2992-3000. 7.Behets J, Declerck P, Delaedt Y, Verelst L & Ollevier F (2007) Survey for the presence of specific free-living amoebae in cooling waters from Belgian power plants. Parasitol Res 100: 1249-1256. 8.Bowers B & Olszewski TE (1972) Pinocytosis in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Kinetics and morphology. J Cell Biol 53: 681-694. 9.Breeuwer P & Abee T (2000) Assessment of viability of microorganisms employing fluorescence techniques. Int J Food Microbiol 55: 193-200. 10.Brescia CC, Griffin SM, Ware MW, Varughese EA, Egorov AI & Villegas EN (2009) Cryptosporidium propidium monoazide-PCR, a molecular biology-based technique for genotyping of viable Cryptosporidium oocysts. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 6856-6863. 11.Brich L, Dawson CE, Cornett JH & Keer JT (2001) A comparison of nucleic acid amplification techniques for the assessment of bacterial viability. Lett Appl Microbiol 33: 296-301. 12.Cao-Hoang L, Marechal PA, Le-Thanh M, Gervais P & Wache Y (2008) Fluorescent probes to evaluate the physiological state and activity of microbial biocatalysts: a guide for prokaryotic and eukaryotic investigation. Biotechnol J 3: 890-903. 13.Cappelier JM, Minet J, Magras C, Colwell RR & Federighi M (1999) Recovery in embryonated eggs of viable but nonculturable Campylobacter jejuni cells and maintenance of ability to adhere to HeLa cells after resuscitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 5154-5157. 14.Chang B, Sugiyama K, Taguri T, Amemura-Maekawa J, Kura F & Watanabe H (2009) Specific detection of viable Legionella cells by combined use of photoactivated ethidium monoazide and PCR/real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 147-153. 15.Chang CW, Wu YC & Ming KW (2010) Evaluation of real-time PCR methods for quantification of Acanthamoeba in anthropogenic water and biofilms. J Appl Microbiol 109: 799-807. 16.Chen NT & Chang CW (2010) Rapid quantification of viable legionellae in water and biofilm using ethidium monoazide coupled with real-time quantitative PCR. J Appl Microbiol 109: 623-634. 17.Coffman GL, Gaubatz JW, Yielding KL & Yielding LW (1982) Demonstration of specific high affinity binding sites in plasmid DNA by photoaffinity labeling with an ethidium analog. J Biol Chem 257: 13205-13207. 18.Culbertson CG (1971) The pathogenicity of soil amebas. Annu Rev Microbiol 25: 231-254. 19.Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Solignac L & Delattre JM (2009) Viability PCR, a culture-independent method for rapid and selective quantification of viable Legionella pneumophila cells in environmental water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 3502-3512. 20.DeTraglia MC, Brand JS & Tometsko AM (1978) Characterization of azidobenzamidines as photoaffinity labels for trypsin. J Biol Chem 253: 1846-1852. 21.Fittipaldi M, Rodriguez NJ, Codony F, Adrados B, Penuela GA & Morato J (2010) Discrimination of infectious bacteriophage T4 virus by propidium monoazide real-time PCR. J Virol Methods 168: 228-232. 22.Flekna G, Stefanic P, Wagner M, Smulders FJ, Mozina SS & Hein I (2007) Insufficient differentiation of live and dead Campylobacter jejuni and Listeria monocytogenes cells by ethidium monoazide (EMA) compromises EMA/real-time PCR. Res Microbiol 158: 405-412. 23.Gedalanga PB & Olson BH (2009) Development of a quantitative PCR method to differentiate between viable and nonviable bacteria in environmental water samples. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82: 587-596. 24.Goldschmidt P, Degorge S, Benallaoua D, et al. (2009) New tool for the simultaneous detection of 10 different genotypes of Acanthamoeba available from the American Type Culture Collection. Br J Ophthalmol 93: 1096-1100. 25.Graiver DA, Saunders SE, Topliff CL, Kelling CL & Bartelt-Hunt SL (2010) Ethidium monoazide does not inhibit RT-PCR amplification of nonviable avian influenza RNA. J Virol Methods 164: 51-54. 26.Greub G & Raoult D (2004) Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 413-433. 27.Grimm D, Ludwig WF, Brandt BC, Michel R, Schleifer KH, Hacker J & Steinert M (2001) Development of 18S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for specific detection of Hartmannella and Naegleria in Legionella-positive environmental samples. Syst Appl Microbiol 24: 76-82. 28.Hein I, Schneeweiss W, Stanek C & Wagner M (2007) Ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide for elimination of unspecific DNA background in quantitative universal real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 71: 336-339. 29.Hixon SC, White WE, Jr. & Yielding KL (1975) Selective covalent binding of an ethidium analog to mitochondrial DNA with production of petite mutants in yeast by photoaffinity labelling. J Mol Biol 92: 319-329. 30.Inoue D, Tsutsui H, Yamazaki Y, Sei K, Soda S, Fujita M & Ike M (2008) Application of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with ethidium monoazide treatment for selective quantification of viable bacteria in aquatic environment. Water Sci Technol 58: 1107-1112. 31.Jager BV & Stamm WP (1972) Brain abscesses caused by free-living amoeba probably of the genus Hartmannella in a patient with Hodgkin's disease. Lancet 2: 1343-1345. 32.Jamil S, Keer JT, Lucas SB, Dockrell HM, Chiang TJ, Hussain R & Stoker NG (1993) Use of polymerase chain reaction to assess efficacy of leprosy chemotherapy. Lancet 342: 264-268. 33.Josefsen MH, Lofstrom C, Hansen TB, Christensen LS, Olsen JE & Hoorfar J (2010) Rapid quantification of viable Campylobacter bacteria on chicken carcasses, using real-time PCR and propidium monoazide treatment, as a tool for quantitative risk assessment. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 5097-5104. 34.Joux F & Lebaron P (1997) Ecological implications of an improved direct viable count method for aquatic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3643-3647. 35.Keer JT & Birch L (2003) Molecular methods for the assessment of bacterial viability. J Microbiol Methods 53: 175-183. 36.Khan NA (2006) Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30: 564-595. 37.Kliescikova J, Kulda J & Nohynkova E (2011) Stress-induced pseudocyst formation--a newly identified mechanism of protection against organic solvents in acanthamoebae of the T4 genotype. Protist 162: 58-69. 38.Kobayashi H, Oethinger M, Tuohy MJ, Hall GS & Bauer TW (2009) Improving clinical significance of PCR: use of propidium monoazide to distinguish viable from dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Orthop Res 27: 1243-1247. 39.Kralik P, Nocker A & Pavlik I (2010) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis viability determination using F57 quantitative PCR in combination with propidium monoazide treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 141 Suppl 1: S80-86. 40.Kramer M, Obermajer N, Bogovic Matijasic B, Rogelj I & Kmetec V (2009) Quantification of live and dead probiotic bacteria in lyophilised product by real-time PCR and by flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84: 1137-1147. 41.Krishna-Prasad BN & Gupta SK (1978) Preliminary report on engulfment and retention of mycobacteria by trophozoites of axenically grown Acanthamoeba castellanii. Clin Microbiol Infect 7: 75-79. 42.Lee C, Kim J, Shin SG & Hwang S (2006) Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 123: 273-280. 43.Lee JL & Levin RE (2008) Discrimination of gamma-irradiated and nonirradiated Vibrio vulnificus by using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Microbiol 104: 728-734. 44.Lee JL & Levin RE (2009) A comparative study of the ability of EMA and PMA to distinguish viable from heat killed mixed bacterial flora from fish fillets. J Microbiol Methods 76: 93-96. 45.Lee JL & Levin RE (2009) Discrimination of viable and dead Vibrio vulnificus after refrigerated and frozen storage using EMA, sodium deoxycholate and real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 79: 184-188. 46.Lee JL & Levin RE (2010) Selective detection of mixed bacterial survivors from fish fillets after freezing and thawing by ethidium bromide monoazide real-time PCR. Food Biotechnology 24: 270-281. 47.Lowder M, Unge A, Maraha N, Jansson JK, Swiggett J & Oliver JD (2000) Effect of starvation and the viable-but-nonculturable state on green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence in GFP-tagged Pseudomonas fluorescens A506. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3160-3165. 48.Martinez AJ (1985) Free-Living Amebas: Natural History, Prevention, Diagnosis, Pathology, and Treatment of Disease. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL. 49.Martinez AJ (1993) Free-living amebas: infection of the central nervous system. Mt Sinai J Med 60: 271-278. 50.Martinez AJ & Visvesvara GS (1997) Free-living, amphizoic and opportunistic amebas. Brain Pathol 7: 583-598. 51.Masters CI, Shallcross JA & Mackey BM (1994) Effect of stress treatments on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by the polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Bacteriol 77: 73-79. 52.McKillip JL, Jaykus LA & Drake M (1999) Nucleic acid persistence in heat-killed Escherichia coli O157:H7 from contaminated skim milk. J Food Prot 62: 839-844. 53.Michel R, Burghardt H & Bergmann H (1995) Acanthamoeba, naturally intracellularly infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, after their isolation from a microbiologically contaminated drinking water system in a hospital. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 196: 532-544. 54.Nagington J, Watson PG, Playfair TJ, McGill J, Jones BR & Steele AD (1974) Amoebic infections of the eye. Lancet ii: 1537-1540. 55.Nebe-von Caron G & Badley RA (1995) Viability assessment of bacteria in mixed populations using flow cytometry. J Microsc 179: 55-66. 56.Neff RJ, Ray SA, Benton WF & Wilborn M (1964) Induction of synchronous encystment (differentiation) in Acanthamoeba sp. Methods in Cell Biology 1: 55-83. 57.Nocker A & Camper AK (2006) Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidium monoazide. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1997-2004. 58.Nocker A & Camper AK (2009) Novel approaches toward preferential detection of viable cells using nucleic acid amplification techniques. FEMS Microbiol Lett 291: 137-142. 59.Nocker A, Cheung CY & Camper AK (2006) Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods 67: 310-320. 60.Nocker A, Sossa KE & Camper AK (2007) Molecular monitoring of disinfection efficacy using propidium monoazide in combination with quantitative PCR. J Microbiol Methods 70: 252-260. 61.Nocker A, Mazza A, Masson L, Camper AK & Brousseau R (2009) Selective detection of live bacteria combining propidium monoazide sample treatment with microarray technology. J Microbiol Methods 76: 253-261. 62.Nogva HK, Dromtorp SM, Nissen H & Rudi K (2003) Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5'-nuclease PCR. Biotechniques 34: 804-808, 810, 812-803. 63.Nwoguh CE, Harwood CR & Barer MR (1995) Detection of induced beta-galactosidase activity in individual non-culturable cells of pathogenic bacteria by quantitative cytological assay. Mol Microbiol 17: 545-554. 64.Oliver JD (2005) The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol 43: 93-100. 65.Page FC (1988) A new key to fresh water and soil Amoebae. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publications, Cumbria, UK. 66.Pan Y & Breidt F, Jr. (2007) Enumeration of viable Listeria monocytogenes cells by real-time PCR with propidium monoazide and ethidium monoazide in the presence of dead cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 8028-8031. 67.Parshionikar S, Laseke I & Fout GS (2010) Use of propidium monoazide in reverse transcriptase PCR to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious enteric viruses in water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 4318-4326 68.Pisz JM, Lawrence JR, Schafer AN & Siciliano SD (2007) Differentiation of genes extracted from non-viable versus viable micro-organisms in environmental samples using ethidium monoazide bromide. J Microbiol Methods 71: 312-318. 69.Priha O, Hallamaa K, Saarela M & Raaska L (2004) Detection of Bacillus cereus group bacteria from cardboard and paper with real-time PCR. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31: 161-169. 70.Pushkarew BM (1913) Uber die Verbreitung der Susswasser-protozoen durch die Luft. Arch Protistent 23: 323-362. 71.Pussard M & Pons R (1977) Morphologies de la paroi kystique et taxonomie du genre Acanthamoeba (Protozoa, Amoebida). Protistologica 13: 557-610. 72.Qvarnstrom Y, Visvesvara GS, Sriram R & da Silva AJ (2006) Multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, and Naegleria fowleri. J Clin Microbiol 44: 3589-3595. 73.Rawsthorne H & Phister TG (2009) Detection of viable Zygosaccharomyces bailii in fruit juices using ethidium monoazide bromide and real-time PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 131: 246-250. 74.Rawsthorne H & Phister TG (2009) The presence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA in various media used to propagate yeasts and its removal by ethidium monoazide. Lett Appl Microbiol 49: 652-654. 75.Rawsthorne H, Dock CN & Jaykus LA (2009) PCR-based method using propidium monoazide to distinguish viable from nonviable Bacillus subtilis spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2936-2939. 76.Riedy MC, Muirhead KA, Jensen CP & Stewart CC (1991) Use of a photolabeling technique to identify nonviable cells in fixed homologous or heterologous cell populations. Cytometry 12: 133-139. 77.Riviere D, Szczebara FM, Berjeaud JM, Frere J & Hechard Y (2006) Development of a real-time PCR assay for quantification of Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts. J Microbiol Methods 64: 78-83. 78.Romanowski G, Lorenz MG, Sayler G & Wackernagel W (1992) Persistence of free plasmid DNA in soil monitored by various methods, including a transformation assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 3012-3019. 79.Rowbotham TJ (1980) Preliminary report on the pathogenicity of Legionella pneumophila for freshwater and soil amoebae. J Clin Pathol 33: 1179-1183. 80.Rudi K, Naterstad K, Dromtorp SM & Holo H (2005) Detection of viable and dead Listeria monocytogenes on gouda-like cheeses by real-time PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 40: 301-306. 81.Rudi K, Moen B, Dromtorp SM & Holck AL (2005) Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 1018-1024. 82.Schroeder JM, Booton GC, Hay J, et al. (2001) Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of acanthamoebae from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge. J Clin Microbiol 39: 1903-1911. 83.Schuster FL & Visvesvara GS (2004) Free-living amoebae as opportunistic and non-opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals. Int J Parasitol 34: 1001-1027. 84.Soejima T, Iida K, Qin T, Taniai H, Seki M & Yoshida S (2008) Method To Detect Only Live Bacteria during PCR Amplification. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2305-2313. 85.Steinert M, Emody L, Amann R & Hacker J (1997) Resuscitation of viable but nonculturable Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia JR32 by Acanthamoeba castellanii. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 2047-2053. 86.Stothard DR, Schroeder-Diedrich JM, Awwad MH, et al. (1998) The evolutionary history of the genus Acanthamoeba and the identification of eight new 18S rRNA gene sequence types. J Eukaryot Microbiol 45: 45-54. 87.Thom S, Warhurst D & Drasar BS (1992) Association of Vibrio cholerae with fresh water amoebae. J Med Microbiol 36: 303-306. 88.Thompson PP, Kowalski RP, Shanks RM & Gordon YJ (2008) Validation of real-time PCR for laboratory diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Clin Microbiol 46: 3232-3236. 89.Tolker-Nielsen T, Larsen MH, Kyed H & Molin S (1997) Effects of stress treatments on the detection of Salmonella typhimurium by in situ hybridization. Int J Food Microbiol 35: 251-258. 90.Trivedi P, Sagaram US, Kim JS, et al. (2009) Quantification of viable Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in hosts using quantitative PCR with the aid of ethidium monoazide (EMA). Eur J Plant Pathol 124: 553-563. 91.Varma M, Field R, Stinson M, Rukovets B, Wymer L & Haugland R (2009) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of total and propidium monoazide-resistant fecal indicator bacteria in wastewater. Water Res 43: 4790-4801. 92.Vesper S, McKinstry C, Hartmann C, Neace M, Yoder S & Vesper A (2008) Quantifying fungal viability in air and water samples using quantitative PCR after treatment with propidium monoazide (PMA). J Microbiol Methods 72: 180-184. 93.Villarino A, Bouvet OM, Regnault B, Martin-Delautre S & Grimont PAD (2000) Exploring the frontier between life and death in Escherichia coli: evaluation of different viability markers in live and heat- or UV-killed cells. Res Microbiol 151: 755-768. 94.Visvesvara GS, Moura H & Schuster FL (2007) Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 50: 1-26. 95.Wang S & Levin RE (2006) Discrimination of viable Vibrio vulnificus cells from dead cells in real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 64: 1-8. 96.Waring MJ (1965) Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids. J Mol Biol 13: 269-282. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45142 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 棘阿米巴(Acanthamoeba)廣泛存在於各種環境中。暴露於活性棘阿米巴可能有感染棘阿米巴角膜炎(Acanthamoeba keratitis, AK)、棘阿米巴皮膚炎(cutaneous acanthamebiasis)與棘阿米巴腦膜炎(Acanthamoeba granulomatous encephalitis)之風險。為能掌控棘阿米巴對人類健康造成的風險,定量環境中活性棘阿米巴扮演著重要的角色。據此,本研究嘗試開發以即時定量聚合酶連鎖反應(real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, qPCR)搭配核酸染劑(ethidium monoazide, EMA與propidium monoazide, PMA),用於檢測並定量活性棘阿米巴之18S rRNA基因。
透過螢光顯微鏡搭配23 μg/mL EMA之染色處理,本研究證實EMA可顯著進入非活性棘阿米巴滋養體(trophozoites)與囊體(cysts)體內,具備區分活性與非活性棘阿米巴之能力。在此基礎下,本研究將活性與非活性棘阿米巴滋養體分別以不同濃度(2.3、23或76.7 μg/mL)之EMA或PMA反應5分鐘,搭配500瓦特鹵素燈照光5、10或20分鐘,再經由qPCR定量DNA分析以評估最佳核酸染劑處理條件。結果顯示EMA與PMA對於定量活性與非活性棘阿米巴之能力並無統計上明顯差異(P = 0.66與P = 0.17)。且相較於無核酸染劑處理之活性棘阿米巴,兩種核酸染劑處理後所得之之DNA量亦無顯著差異(P = 0.78與P = 0.13),然兩種染劑可顯著抑制非活性棘阿米巴之DNA被qPCR偵測與定量(P = 0.02與P = 0.0001)。其中EMA之各濃度與各照光時間在DNA量並無統計差別。據此,本研究以2. 3 μg/mL EMA反應5分鐘,搭配500瓦特鹵素燈照光20分鐘作為棘阿米巴之最佳核酸染劑處理之條件。而此方法於線性關性良好(R2 = 0.98)情況下,定量活性棘阿米巴之偵測上限為1.5 x 105 cells,下限則為1.5 x 102 cells。本研究也發現,使用此最佳核酸染劑處理條件可顯著區分活性與面對不同受熱溫度(75、80、85、90與95°C)下不同囊化程度之棘阿米巴,包括未完全囊化之棘阿米巴(囊體百分比為53.6 ± 3.49%)(P < 0.0001)與棘阿米巴囊體(囊體百分比為91.7 ± 1.79%)(P < 0.0001)。且受熱溫度與qPCR所得之DNA量呈現劑量效應之關係(r = -0.95, P < 0.0001;r = -0.93, P < 0.0001)。比較滋養體與不同囊化程度之A. castellanii則顯示,A. castellanii 囊體對熱之耐受程度最高, 未完全囊化之 A. castellanii次之,耐熱程度最低者為A. castellanii 滋養體。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Acanthamoeba has been detected from various natural and artificial environments. Exposure to viable Acanthamoeba may cause severe Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) which could result in blindness, cutaneous acanthamebiasis and lethal Acanthamoeba granulomatous encephalitis (AGE) in humans. Accurate quantification of viable Acanthamoeba plays an important role to assess the risk that Acanthamoeba poses to human health. Hence, we have adopted ethidium monoazide (EMA) and propidium monoazide (PMA) coupled with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to rapidly detect and quantify viable Acanthamoeba exclusively.
With alive and heat-inactivated Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts stained with 23μg/mL EMA and analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy, we found that heat-inactivated Acanthamoeba were significantly permeable to EMA and were stained bright red. The result showed EMA had the ability of discriminating between alive and heat-inactivated Acanthamoeba. Base on the finding, alive and heat-inactivated cells were treated with EMA or PMA in nine combinations at 2.3, 23 or 76.7 μg/mL with a 500-W light exposure for 5, 10 or 20 min. Alive and heat-inactivated cells were also prepared without EMA or PMA treatment as controls. After DNA extraction and qPCR analysis, DNA quantity in controls and samples was determined. The results indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the use of EMA and PMA in quantifying alive and heat-inactivated Acanthamoeba (P = 0.66, P = 0.17). Further analysis of alive cells, our results showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.78, P = 0.13) in DNA quantity between EMA/PMA-treated and -untreated samples, whereas a significant decrease of DNA quantity (P = 0.02, P = 0.0001) was observed for the heat-inactivated cells pretreated with EMA or PMA as compared to that of deal cells without EMA/PMA treatment. The DNA quantity in heat-inactivated cells of nine EMA combinations was statistically indifferent. According to the DNA quantity and statistical results, the optimal protocol was determined as cells incubated 2.3 μg/mL EMA for 5 min with a 500-W light exposure for 20 min. Under a good linearity (R2 = 0.98) for the method, the upper and lower detection limits for quantification viable Acanthamoeba were 1.5 x 105 cells and 1.5 x 102 cells respectively. Our results also demonstrated that the optimal protocol can significantly differentiate alive and heat-inactivated (75, 80, 85, 90 and 95°C, 20 min) Transient Acanthamoeba (cyst percentage: 53.6±3.49%) (P < 0.0001) and Acanthamoeba cysts (cyst percentage: 91.7±1.79%) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the DNA quantity was decreased with the increasing level of heat stress for EMA-treated Transient Acanthamoeba and Acanthamoeba cysts in a dose-response matter (r = -0.95 and -0.93, respectively, both P < 0.0001). Our results demonstrated that Acanthamoeba trophozoites were the most sensitive to heat stress, followed by Transient Acanthamoeba, and the last were Acanthamoeba cysts. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:06:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98844007-1.pdf: 2481585 bytes, checksum: 4b899a37e1d5f6a29c7db15c3d242dc7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract III 目錄 VI 表目錄 IX 圖目錄 X 第一章 前言 1 1.1. 背景 1 1.2. 文獻回顧 2 1.2.1. 棘阿米巴 2 1.2.2. 活性微生物之檢測 4 1.2.3. qPCR搭配核酸染劑 5 1.2.4. 環境棘阿米巴之偵測與定量 15 第二章 研究目的 17 第三章 研究架構 18 3.1. 以顯微鏡搭配核酸染劑之處理,驗證核酸染劑是否具備區分活性棘阿米巴之能力。 19 3.2. 評估qPCR搭配核酸染劑之方法,在定量活性棘阿米巴之適用性,並尋找最佳核酸染劑處理條件。 20 3.3. 評估在最佳核酸染劑處理條件下,以qPCR搭配核酸染劑之方法在定量活性棘阿米巴之上、下限值與線性關係。 21 3.4. 以qPCR搭配核酸染劑之方法,評估不同受熱條件對不同生理階段之棘阿米巴細胞膜的影響。 22 第四章 方法與材料 23 4.1. 原蟲培養液和緩衝溶液 23 4.1.1. proteose–yeast–glucose(PYG)培養液 (ATCC 培養液712) 23 4.1.2. 囊化(encystment)培養液 23 4.1.3. Page’s Amoeba Saline(PAS) 23 4.1.4. TE緩衝溶液 23 4.2. 原蟲來源與培養 24 4.2.1. A. castellanii滋養體 24 4.2.2.未完全囊化之Transient A. castellanii 24 4.2.3. A. castellanii囊體 24 4.3. 以顯微鏡搭配EMA染色觀察活性與非活性棘阿米巴 25 4.3.1. 核酸染劑處理 25 4.3.2. 顯微鏡分析 25 4.4. 最佳核酸染劑處理條件 26 4.4.1. 製備已知濃度的原蟲 26 4.4.2. 加熱處理 27 4.4.3. 核酸染劑配製和處理 28 4.4.4. DNA萃取 29 4.4.5. qPCR 30 4.4.6. 製備棘阿米巴DNA標準品及檢量線 31 4.4.7. 定量指標 32 4.5.最佳核酸染劑條件下之線性關係與偵測上下限 33 4.5.1. 製備已知濃度的原蟲 33 4.5.2. 加熱處理 34 4.5.3. 核酸染劑處理 34 4.5.4. DNA萃取與qPCR 34 4.6. 不同受熱條件對不同生理階段棘阿米巴細胞膜之影響 35 4.6.1. 製備已知濃度的原蟲 35 4.6.2. 加熱處理 35 4.6.3. 核酸染劑處理 36 4.6.4. DNA萃取與qPCR 36 第五章 結果 37 5.1. 以顯微鏡搭配EMA染色觀察活性與非活性棘阿米巴原蟲 37 5.2. 最佳核酸染劑處理條件 40 5.3. 最佳核酸染劑條件下之線性關係與偵測上、下限 42 5.4. 不同受熱條件對不同生理階段棘阿米巴細胞膜之影響 48 5.5. 比較不同生理階段棘阿米巴對受熱壓力之反應 50 5.6. 統計檢定 51 第六章 討論 55 6.1. 以顯微鏡搭配EMA染色觀察活性與非活性棘阿米巴55 6.2. 最佳核酸染劑處理條件 57 6.3. 最佳核酸染劑條件下之線性關係與偵測上、下限 61 6.4. 不同受熱條件對不同生理階段棘阿米巴細胞膜之影響 62 第七章 結論與建議 65 7.1. 研究結論 65 7.2. 研究建議 65 參考文獻 67 附件 79 口試委員之建議事項 80 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以核酸染劑結合即時定量聚合酶連鎖反應
定量活性Acanthamoeba | zh_TW |
dc.title | Quantification of viable Acanthamoeba by real-time quantitative PCR coupled with DNA binding dyes | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許昺慕(Bing-Mu Hsu),嵇達德(Dar-Der Ji) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 棘阿米巴,即時定量聚合酶,連鎖反應,生物活性,ethidium monoazide,propidium monoazide, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Acanthamoeba,Real-time quantitative PCR,Viability,ethidium monoazide,propidium monoazide, | en |
dc.relation.page | 81 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境衛生研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境衛生研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。