請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45132完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huei-Hua Jan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 詹蕙華 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:05:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-02-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-02-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-02-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王梅玲、林志鳳、林孟玲和賴美玲（民92）。圖書資訊選擇與採訪。台北縣盧洲市：國立空中大學。
王麗蕉和鄭雅靜（民95）。大學圖書館評鑑之探討。國家圖書館館刊，95（1），35-58。 李美燕（民85）。電子期刊：圖書館新資源。圖書與資訊學刊，15，54-76。 吳明德（民76）。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之探討（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 76-0301-H002-13）。台北市：臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。 吳明德和薛理桂(民84)。圖書選擇與採訪。臺北縣蘆洲鄉：國立空中大學。 吳明德(民95)。館藏發展的再省思：從一些數據談起。在國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所編，數位時代圖書館館藏發展研究討會論文集。台中市：編者。 范豪英(民85)。館藏評鑑：試以書目核對法評比中國大學圖書館土壤學核心書刊之蒐藏。國家圖書館館刊，1，61-75。 陳旭耀(民85)。臺灣地區圖書資訊學碩士論文及其引用文獻之研究。未出版之碩士論文，輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北縣。 蔡天怡（民97）。資訊可獲性對圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻影響之研究。非正式出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。 蘇蓉波(民92)。從博士學位文引用文獻探討成功大學圖書館館藏支援程度。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，12，53-69。 莊道明(民84)，館藏可得性研究。圖書館學與圖書資訊科學大辭典。(頁2284)，臺北市：漢美。 Ajlan, A. (1985).The effectiveness of to academic libraries in Saudi Arabia: An enquiry into the main factions affecting their services. Case Western Reserve University. Baker, S. L. & Lancaster, F. W. (1991).The Measurement and evaluation of library services. Arlington, Va. : Information Resources Press. Barschall, H. H. (1988).Electronic version of printed journals. Serials Review, 17, 49. Brandt, S. (1992).Accessing electronic journals. Academic and Library Computer, 9(10), 17. Buckland, M. K. (1975).Book availability and the library user. New York: Pergamum. Buzzard, M. L. & New, D. E.(1983).An investigation of collection support for doctoral research. College and Research Libraries, 44(6), 469-475. Ciliberti, A. C., Radford, M. L., Radfrod, G. P., & Ballard, T. (1998).Empty handed?: A material availability study and transaction log analysis verification The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24(4), 282-289. Covey, D. T.(2003).The need to improve remote assess to online library resources: Filling the gap between commercial vendor and academic user practice. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(4), 309-014. Dunlap, C. R.(1976).Reaching the graduate students: Techniques and administration. In Radar, H. B.(Ed.).Faculty Involement in Library Instruction. Egan, N. (2005). The impact of electronic full-test resources on interlibrary loan: A ten-year study at John Jay college of criminal justice. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserves, 15(3), 23-41. Gaskill, H. V., Dunbar, R. M. & Brown, C. H. (1934). An analytical study of the use of a college library. Library Quarterly, 4, 564-589. Gnoza, E.(1951).A survey of the circulation department: Charles deering library. Northwestern University Janayary-February, Photocopy. Grarson, L. R., & Howard, J. G. (1984). Electronic publishing: Potential benefits and problems for authors, publishers and libraries. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 24, 123. Hall, B. H. (1985). Collection assessment manual for college and university libraries. Phoenix, Airs: Oryx. Jacobs, N. A. (1995). The evaluation and improvement of book availability in an academic library. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1, 41-55. Jenkins, C., & Morley, M. (1999). Introduction. Gower: Alders hot. Kantor, P. B. (1976). Availability analysis. American Society for Information Science, 27(6), 311-319. Kantor, P. B. (1984). Objective performance measures for academic library. Washington, D.C.: Association of research libraries. Kilgour, F. G. (1989). Towards 100 percent availability. Library Journal, 114, 50-53. Kilgour, F. G. (2001). Known-item online searches employed by scholars using surname plus first, or last, or first and last title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(14), 1203-1209. Kolner, S. J. & Welch, E. C. (1985). The book availability study as an objective measure of performance in a health science library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 73(2), 121-131. Kushkowshi, J., Parsons, K., & Wiese, W. (2003). Master's and Doctoral Thesis Citations : Analysis and Trends of a Longitudinal Study. Library & the Academy, 3(3), 459-479. Lacaster, F. W.(1993).If you want to evaluate your library, London : Library Association. Langschied, L. (1992). Electronic journal forum: Column I. Serials Review, 18, 131. Lee, J. H., Renear, A.& Smith, L. C. (2006) Known-item search: variations on a concept. In grove, Andrew, eds. Proceedings 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) 43, Austin (US). Line, M. B. (1973). The ability of university library to provide books wanted by researchers. Journal of Librarianship, 5, 37-41. Liu, Z., & Yang, Z. (2004). Factors influencing distance-education gradate student's use of information sources: A user study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 24-35. Mansbridge, J. (1984). Evaluation Resource Sharing library networks. In Unpublished dissertation. OH.: Vase Western reserve University, Cleveland. Mansbridge, J. (1986). Availability studies in libraries. Library and Information Science Research, 8(4), 299-314. McMillan, G. (1991). Embracing the electronic journal: One library plan. The Serials Librarian, 21(97). Meier, R. L.(1963).Information input overload: Features of growth in communications-org-ented institutions. Libri, 15, 1-44. Mitchell, E. S., Radford, M. L., & Hegg, J. L. (1994). Book availability: academic library assessment. College and Research Libraries, 55(1), 47-55. Nisonger, T. E. (2007). A review and analysis of library availability studies. Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(1), 30-49. OKerson, A. (1991). The electronic journal: What, whence, and when? The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2, 5. Rashid, H. F. (1990). Book availability as a performance measure of a library: an analysis of the effectiveness of a health science library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(7), 501-507. Rehman, S. U., Arif, K., & Chaudhry, A. S. (1994). Availability analysis: Conduct comparison and applications. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 25, 19-26. Rehman, S. U., & Bashir, S. (1993). Comparative measurement of book availability in academic libraries. International Information and Library Review, 25, 183-193. Revill, D. H. (1987). Availability as a performance measure for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship, 19, 14-30. Saracevic, T., Shaw, W. M., & Kantor, P. B. (1977). Causes and dynamic of user frustrating in an academic library. College and Research Libraries, 37, 7-18. Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the Academic Society for Information Science, 45(2), 77-100. Schofield, J. L., Cooper, A. & Waters, D. H. (1975).Evaluation of an academic library’s stack effectiveness. Journal of Librarianship, 7(3), 207-227. Shaw, W. M.(1980). Longitudinal studies of book availability. In Library Effectiveness a State of the Art. N.Y. Kaske and Jones, W.G. eds337-349, Library Administration and Management Association / American Library Association, N.Y. Shaw-Kokot, J., & Varre, C. d. l. (2001). Using a journal availability study to improve access. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89(1), 21-28. Smith, R. H. & Warner, G.(1978).User and library failures in an undergraduate library. Collage and Research Library, 39(6), 467-473. Thomas, J. (1993). Graduate student use of journals: A bolometric study of psychology theses. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 12(1), 1-7. Walcott, R. (1994). Local citation studies: a shortcut to local knowledge. Science & Technology Librarians, 14, 1-14. Washington-Hoagland, C., & Clougherty, L. (2002). Identifying the resource and service needs of graduate and professional students: The university of Iowa user needs of graduate professional series. Portal : Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 125-143. Woodward, H. (1994). The impact of electronic information on serials collection management. ILFA Journal, 20, 29-36. Whitlach, J. B., & Kieffer, K. (1978). Service at San Jose State university: Survey of document availability. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 4, 197-199. Wuff, Y.(1978). Book availability in the university of Minnesota Bo-Medical library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 66, 349-350. Zipp, L. S.(1996). Thesis and dissertation citations as indicators of faculty research use of university library journal collections. Library Resources and Technical Services, 40, 335-342. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45132 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的在探討圖書館館藏滿足學術研究的程度，和探討使用者取得圖書館館藏的比率和沒有取得館藏的可能原因，也期望建立容易執行的館藏評鑑方法。
館藏可得性研究法是館藏評鑑的方法之一，且以應用分支技術法為最多，其相關文獻在國外已有將近百篇的文獻，但在國內目前沒有應用此研究方法的文獻發表。 本研究以圖書和期刊二大項進行館藏可得性研究法之調查。以國立暨南國際大學的研究生為研究對象，採用分支技術法做為研究方法，調查樣本共計786件，以五項（採購、目錄、流通、圖書館、使用者）失誤因素進行實證研究，計算並以分支技術圖呈現調查結果。 研究結果顯示，暨大圖書館的館藏可得性比率（MAV）為65.65%，其中，圖書的MAV為52.03%，期刊的MAV為77.70%；期刊的MAV高於圖書，係因中文期刊的MAV比較高所致，而圖書MAV較低，乃係西文圖書MAV偏低所致。尤以管理學院及科技學院。顯示，西文圖書最不符合研究生的學術需求。 中文期刊的需求數量最少，但取得率達九成。西文期刊的需求數量最多，取得率達七成以上。中文圖書需求量排第二，取得率不到七成，係因人院的取得率僅六成餘。尤其歷史系最低。西文圖書需求數量不多，但取得率亦不到三成，係因管院（資管所）和科院（資工所）的取得率偏低。 扣除採購失誤可得性比率（MAV-ACQ）為71.88%、扣除目錄失誤可得性比率（MAV-CAT）為99.65%、扣除流通失誤可得性比率（MAV-CIRC）為96.09%、扣除圖書館失誤可得性比率（MAV-LIB）為99.08%、扣除使用者失誤可得性比率（MAV-USER）為96.27%。主要的失誤是採購失誤，其次是流通失誤，第三是使用者失誤。 相關文獻的主要失誤是流通失誤和圖書館失誤，與本研究結果不同，可能的原因：1.調查館藏使用目的不同。本研究調查對象為研究生，以學術需求為研究目的，相關文獻可能調查的是一般圖書的使用需求。2.調查館藏類型的不同。目前電子館藏日漸增加，亦沒有排架和流通的問題，相關文獻的調查以紙本圖書為主，全文電子期刊亦沒現在普及。所以本研究的流通失誤和圖書館失誤較相關文獻為少。 研究者依研究結果提出以下建議：1.修正採購圖書館藏經費政策。2.建立使用者推薦館藏機制。3.補強MAV較低系所的主題館藏。4.增購電子館藏。5.加強使用者的資訊檢索素養。 進一步的研究，1.其他使用者類型的可得性調查。2.其他使用目的的可得性調查。3.視聽資料可得性的調查。4.使用者沒有取得館藏的後續調查。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | A self availability analysis was conducted to assess the degree to which National Chi Nan University Library was able to support graduate students who were in the process of the writing their theses. Both monographs and journal articles were taken into consideration. Using Kantor’s branching technique model, I was able to attribute library access failures to various errors in library operations: acquisition, cataloging, circulation, library and users. It was found that the immediate availability rate is low compared to findings in the literature. Acquisition errors accounts for the largest portion of the failures. Detailed analyses were made to investigate the availability rate and the distributions of error components in different types of library collection. It was found that monographs in foreign languages have the lowest availability rate. This is especially so in the subject of management, science and engineering. Based on the findings, I made a list of policy suggestion intended to improve availability rate in the future. A comparison was also made between present study and those reported in the literature. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:05:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-P93126011-1.pdf: 1563138 bytes, checksum: d7b9cd82404c2d46fe9757a6180b6cb0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 ....................................................Ⅰ
中文摘要 ................................................Ⅲ 英文摘要 ................................................Ⅴ 目次 ....................................................Ⅵ 表目次 ..................................................Ⅷ 圖目次 ..................................................Ⅸ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機和背景 ..................................1 第二節 研究目的和問題 ..................................5 第三節 研究範圍和限制 ..................................7 第四節 名詞定義與解釋 ..................................8 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 館藏可得性研究的發展 ............................11 第二節 分支技術法的介紹 ................................16 第三節 分支技術法的文獻分析 ............................23 第三章 研究設計和實施 第一節 研究方法設計 ....................................33 第二節 研究流程和工具 ..................................41 第三節 研究步驟 ........................................56 第四章 研究結果分析 第一節 受訪者基本資料分析 ..............................62 第二節 館藏取得率分析 ..................................64 第三節 各項失誤因素數量分析 ............................67 第四節 館藏的MAV .......................................75 第五節 依館藏類型區分的MAV .............................77 第六節 依學院區分的MAV .................................80 第七節 綜合分析 ........................................89 第五章 結論和建議 第一節 結論 ............................................92 第二節 申請館合 ........................................97 第三節 建議 ...........................................101 第四節 進一步研究建議 .................................104 參考書目 ...............................................107 附錄 研究前測問卷 .....................................113 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 大學圖書館 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 圖書館評鑑 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 館藏可得性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 分支技術法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Self Availability Study | en |
| dc.subject | Academic Library | en |
| dc.subject | Branching Technique | en |
| dc.subject | Library Evaluation | en |
| dc.title | 大學圖書館館藏可得性之研究 : 以國立暨南國際大學圖書館為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on Shelf Availability in Academic Libraries : A Case Study of National Chi Nan University Library | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳明德,藍文欽 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 圖書館評鑑,館藏可得性研究,分支技術法,大學圖書館, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Library Evaluation,Self Availability Study,Branching Technique,Academic Library, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 122 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-02-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。