請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45091
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 潘璦琬(Ay-Woan Pan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Ting Ko | en |
dc.contributor.author | 柯瑋婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:04:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-03-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-02-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abdi, H. (2007). Bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Andrrich, D. (1988). Rasch Models for Measurement NewburyPark,CA:Sage Publications. Asmundsdottir, E. E. (2004). The Worker Role Interview: a powerful tool in Icelandic work rehabilitation. Work, 22(1), 21-26. Baker, N. A., & Jacobs, K. (2003). The nature of working in the United States: an occupational therapy perspective. Work, 20(1), 53-61. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of general psychiatry, 4, 561-571. Beck, C. T., Bernal, H., & Froman, R. D. (2003). Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(1), 64-73. Berns, S., Uzelac, S., Gonzalez, C., & Jaeger, J. (2007). Methodological considerations of measuring disability in bipolar disorder: validity of the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning. Bipolar Disorders, 9(1-2), 3-10. Biernacki, S. D. (1993). Reliability of the worker role interview. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(9), 797-803. Blank, L., Peters, J., Pickvance, S., Wilford, J., & Macdonald, E. (2008). A Systematic Review of the Factors which Predict Return to Work for People Suffering Episodes of Poor Mental Health. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 27-34. Boardman, J., Grove, B., Perkins, R., & Shepherd, G. (2003). Work and employment for people with psychiatric disabilities. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(6), 467-468. Braveman, B. (1999). The model of human occupation and prediction of return to work: a review of related empirical research. Work, 12(1), 25-35. Braveman, B., Robson, M., Velozo, C., Kielhofner, G., Fisher, G., Forsyth, K., et al. (2005). A User's Guide to Worker Role Interview (WRI) (Version 10.0): University of Illinois at Chicago. Capitulo, K. L., Cornelio, M. A., & Lenz, E. R. (2001). Translating the short version of the Perinatal Grief Scale: process and challenges. Applied Nursing Research, 14(3), 165-170. Cheng, A. T. A., Tien, A. Y., Chang, C. J., Brugha, T. S., Cooper, J. E., Lee, C. S., et al. (2001). Cross-cultural implementation of a Chinese version of the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) in Taiwan. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 178(6), 567-572. Cheung, K. M. C. F. F. F., Senkoylu, A. M. D., Alanay, A. M. D., Genc, Y. P., Lau, S., & Luk, K. D. F. F. F. M. F. (2007). Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Adapted Chinese Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Questionnaire. Spine, 32(10), 1141-1145. Clemson, L., Bundy, A., Unsworth, C., & Singh, M. F. (2009). Validation of the modified assessment of living skills and resources, an IADL measure for older people. [Validation Studies]. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31(5), 359-369. Colon, H., & Haertlein, C. (2002). Spanish translation of the role checklist. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 586-589. Craig, A. V., Gary, K., Alicia, G., Fang-Ling, L., Fatema, A., Jin-Shei, L., et al. (1999). Worker Role Interview: Toward Validation of a Psychosocial Work-Related Measure. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 9(3), 153. Del Greco, L., Walop, W., & Eastridge, L. (1987). Questionnaire development: 3. Translation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 136(8), 817-818. Eisen, J. L., Mancebo, M. A., Pinto, A., Coles, M. E., Pagano, M. E., Stout, R., et al. (2006). Impact of obsessive-compulsive disorder on quality of life. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47(4), 270-275. Ekbladh, E., Haglund, L., & Thorell, L. H. (2004). The worker role interview--preliminary data on the predictive validity of return to work of clients after an insurance medicine investigation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14(2), 131-141. Ellison, M. L. P., Russinova, Z. P., Lyass, A. P., & Rogers, E. S. S. (2008). Professionals and Managers With Severe Mental Illnesses: Findings From a National Survey. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 196(3), 179-189. Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A Comprehensive Method for the Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(2), 212-232. Fabian, E. S. (2000). Social Cognitive Theory Of Careers And Individuals With Serious Mental Health Disorders: Implications For Psychiatric Rehabilitation Programs. [Article]. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23, 262. Farin, E., & Fleitz, A. (2009). The development of an ICF-oriented, adaptive physician assessment instrument of mobility, self-care, and domestic life. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 32(2), 98-107. Fenger, K., & Kramer, J. M. (2007). Worker Role Interview: Testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 160 - 172. Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D., Mitchell, T., Wintrob, R., Richman, J. A., et al. (1988). Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. Journal of nervous and mental disease, 176(5), 257-263. Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613-619. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., et al. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(2), 186-197. Forsyth, K., Braveman, B., Kielhofner, G., Ekbladh, E., Haglund, L., Fenger, K., et al. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Worker Role Interview. Work, 27(3), 313-318. Gibson, L., & Strong, J. (2003). A conceptual framework of functional capacity evaluation for occupational therapy in work rehabilitation. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50(2), 64-71. Glynn, S. M., Marder, S. R., Liberman, R. P., Blair, K., Wirshing, W. C., Wirshing, D. A., et al. (2004). Supplementing Clinic-Based Skills Training With Manual-Based Community Support Sessions: Effects on Social Adjustment of Patients With Schizophrenia. Focus, 2(1), 68-77. Green, M. F. (1996). What Are the Functional Consequences of Neurocognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia? American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(3), 321-330. Haglund, L., Karlsson, G., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. S. (1997). Validity of the Swedish Version of the Worker Role Interview. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 4(1), 23 - 29. Haley, S. M., Fragala-Pinkham, M. A., Dumas, H. M., Ni, P., Gorton, G. E., Watson, K., et al. (2009). Evaluation of an Item Bank for a Computerized Adaptive Test of Activity in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Physical Therapy, 89(6), 589-600. Hannula, J. A., Lahtela, K., Jarvikoski, A., Salminen, J. K., Makela, P., Hannula, J. A., et al. (2006). Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS)--an instrument for assessment of work ability in psychiatric disorders. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60(5), 372-378. Hansen, A., Edlund, G., & Henningsson, M. (2006). Factors relevant to a return to work: A multivariate approach. Work, 26(2), 179-190. Harnois, G., & Gabriel, P. (2000). Mental health and work: Impact, issues and good practice. Geneva: World Health Organization. Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating Instruments Into Other Languages: Development and Testing Processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1-7. Innes, E., & Straker, L. (1998). A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 2 -- design problems. Work, 11(2), 191-206. Iréne, L., Eva, N., & Anna-Lena, B. (2003). Construct validity of the instrument DOA: A dialogue about ability related to work. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 20(3), 215-224. Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schettler, P. J., Endicott, J., Leon, A. C., Solomon, D. A., et al. (2005). Psychosocial Disability in the Course of Bipolar I and II Disorders: A Prospective, Comparative, Longitudinal Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 62(12), 1322-1330. Karidi, M. V., Papakonstantinou, K., Stefanis, N., Zografou, M., Karamouzi, G., Skaltsi, P., et al. (2005). Occupational abilities and performance scale--reliability-validity assessment factor analysis. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(5), 417-424. Kielhofner, G., Forsyth, K., Clay, C., Ekbladh, E., Haglund, L., Hemmingson, H., et al. (2008). Talking With Clients: Assessments That Collect Information Through Interviews. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Model OF Human Occupation: Theory and Application.(4th ed.) (pp. 185-203). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Kielhofner, G., Lai, J. S., Olson, L., Haglund, L., Ekbadh, E., & Hedlund, M. (1999). Psychometric properties of the work environment impact scale: a cross-cultural study. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 12(1), 71-77. Kirsh, B. (2000a). Factors Associated with Employmnet for Mental Health Consumers. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(1), 13-21. Kirsh, B. (2000b). Organizational culture, climate and person-environment fit: Relationships with employment outcomes for mental health consumers. Work, 14(2), 109-122. Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Kupst, M. J., Holm, S., Kelly, M. E., Bode, R. K., et al. (2007). Measuring Fatigue for Children With Cancer: Development and Validation of the Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (pedsFACIT-F). Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 29(7), 471-479. Lai, J. S., Crane, P., & Cella, D. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1179-1190. Lechner, D. (1991). Functional capacity evaluation in work disability. Work, 1(3), 37-47. Leon, A. C., Solomon, D. A., Mueller, T. I., Endicott, J., Posternak, M., Judd, L. L., et al. (2000). A Brief Assessment of Psychosocial Functioning of Subjects with Bipolar I Disorder: The LIFE-RIFT. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 188(12), 805-812. Leon, A. C., Solomon, D. A., Mueller, T. I., Turvey, C. L., Endicott, J., & Keller, M. B. (1999). The Range of Impaired Functioning Tool: a brief measure of functional impairment. Psychological Medicine, 29(04), 869-878. Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample Size and Item Calibration [or Person Measure] Stability. Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328. Linacre, J. M. (2003). A User's Guide to WINSTEP, MINISTEP: Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA. Macias, C., DeCarlo, L. T., Wang, Q., Frey, J., & Barreira, P. (2001). Work interest as a predictor of competitive employment: policy implications for psychiatric rehabilitation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 28(4), 279-297. Marwaha, S., & Johnson, S. (2004). Schizophrenia and employment. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(5), 337-349. Marwaha, S., Johnson, S., Bebbington, P., Stafford, M., Angermeyer, M. C., Brugha, T., et al. (2007). Rates and correlates of employment in people with schizophrenia in the UK, France and Germany. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1), 30-37. McKay, R. B. (1996). Translating survey questionnaires: Lessons learned. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1996(70), 93. Moore, D. J., Palmer, B. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2004). Use of the Mini-Mental State Exam in Middle-Aged and Older Outpatients With Schizophrenia: Cognitive Impairment and Its Associations. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry July/August, 12(4), 412-419. Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Verbeek, J. H., de Boer, A. G., Blonk, R. W., & van Dijk, F. J. (2004). Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(10), 817-823. Norrby, E., & Linddahl, I. (2006). Reliability of the instrument DOA: Dialogue about ability related to work. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 26(2), 131-139. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Pan, A. W., Fan, C. W., Chung, L., Kielhofner, G., Chen, T. J., Wu, M. Y., et al. Examining validity of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool : Using classical test theory and item response theory. [submitted]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Statistical Measures of Reliability. Foundations of clinical research (pp. 585-618). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Prentice Hall. Ramirez, M. P., Teresi, J. A. E. P., Holmes, D. P., Gurland, B. M. D., & Lantigua, R. M. D. (2006). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): Overview, Sample, and Issues of Translation. Medical Care Measurement in a Multi-Ethnic Society, 44(11), S95-S106. Robinson, D. G., Woerner, M. G., McMeniman, M., Mendelowitz, A., & Bilder, R. M. (2004). Symptomatic and Functional Recovery From a First Episode of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder. Am J Psychiatry, 161(3), 473-479. Rogers, E. S., McQuilken, M., Zahniser, J. H., Novak, J., Starks, R. D., Olmos, A., et al. (2003). The work project survey: Consumer perspectives on work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 18, 59. Rosner, B. (2006). Hypothesis Testing: Categorical Data. In B. Rosner (Ed.), Fundamentals of biostatistics (6th ed ed., pp. 385-445). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Brooks/Cole. Sandqvist, J. L., & Henriksson, C. M. (2004). Work functioning: A conceptual framework. Work, 23(2), 147-157. Sandqvist, J. L., ouml, rnquist, K. B., & Henriksson, C. M. (2006). Assessment of Work Performance (AWP) - development of an instrument. Work, 26(4), 379-387. Schooler, N., Hogarty, G., & Weissman, M. (1979). Social Adjustment Scale II. In W. A. Hargreaves, C. C. Atkisson & S. J. Rockville (Eds.), Resource Materials for Community Mental Health Program Evaluations (2 ed.). Washington,DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004). Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 13(4), 251-271. Steer, R. A., Ball, R., Ranieri, W. F., & Beck, A. T. (1999). Dimensions of the Beck depression inventory-II in clinically depressed outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 117-128. Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., & Roth, D. A. (2004). Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the beck depression inventory second edition in a sample of college students. Depression and Anxiety, 19(3), 187-189. Tsang, H., Ng, B., Chiu, I. Y., & Mann, S. (2000). Predictors of post-hospital employment status for psychiatric patients in Hong Kong: from perceptions of rehabilitation professionals to empirical evidence. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 46(4), 306-312. Turton, N. (2001). Welfare benefits and work disincentives. Journal of Mental Health, 10, 285-300. Velozo, C. A. (1993). Work evaluations: critique of the state of the art of functional assessment of work. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 203-209. Wästberg, B. A., Haglund, L., & Eklund, M. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Worker Role Self-assessment instrument used to evaluate unemployed people in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16(4), 238-246. Waghorn, G., Chant, D., King, R., Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & King, R. (2005). Work-related self-efficacy among community residents with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 29(2), 105-113. Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17(1), 101-110. Whisman, M. A., Perez, J. E., & Ramel, W. (2000). Factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory second Edition (BDI-ii) in a student sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 545-551. WHO (2001). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Halth Organization. Wong, T. T., Liang, G. Y., Corner, R. A., Kielhofner, G., & Lin, F. L. (1997). Construct validity of a work environment impact scale. Work, 9, 21-34. Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101(5), 342. Yu, D. S. F., Lee, D. T. F., & Woo, J. (2004). Issues and Challenges of Instrument Translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26(3), 307-320. 內政部統計處 (2008). 96年底列冊身心障礙者人數統計. from http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/. 王文中 (1996). 幾個有關Rasch 測量模式的爭議. 教育與心理研究, 19, 1-26. 王文中 (1997). 測驗的建構:因素分析還是Rasch分析?. 調查研究, 3, 129-166. 王淑敏 (2004). 中文版「職能自我評估」之心理計量品質研究 --以台灣精神分裂症個案為例. 臺灣大學, 台北市. 王寶墉 (1995a). 訊息函數 現代測驗理論 (初版 ed., pp. 157-172). 台北市: 心理出版社. 王寶墉 (1995b). 現代測驗IRT的假定 現代測驗理論 (初版 ed., pp. 31-49). 台北市: 心理出版社. 行政院勞工委員會 (2007). 九十六年身心障礙者勞動狀況調查 from http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/com/statinvest.htm. 邱皓政 (2003). 結構方程模式 :LISREL的理論、技術與應用. 台北市: 雙葉書廊. 范珈維 (2008). 人類職能模式篩選量表之信效度探討. 臺灣大學, 台北市. 范珈維, 張彧, & 潘璦琬 (2007). 精神障礙者重返工作之因素探討:文獻回顧. 臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌, 3(2), 61-71. 郭乃文, 劉秀枝, 王珮芳, 廖光淦, 甄瑞興, 林恭平, et al. (1988). 「簡短式智能評估」之中文施測與常模建立. 中華民國復健醫學會雜誌, 52-59. 楊明山, 曾美智, 李明濱, 鍾麗英, & 潘璦琬 (2007). 意志量表中文版之發展與應用於憂鬱症患者再測信度之初步探究. 臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌, 3(1), 11-18. 潘璦琬, & 許瑋玲 (2008). 羅序模式檢定貝氏憂鬱量表第二版之建構效度. 臺灣醫學, 12(3), 284-291. 潘璦琬, 喬慧燕, 熊秉荃, 陳詞章, & 鍾麗英 (2007). 中文版加拿大職能表現測驗於精神分裂症患者之效度研究. 職能治療學會雜誌, 1-14. 蔡茂堂, 文榮光, 林信男, 宋維村, & 陳珠彰 (1978). 精神科門診病人自填症狀量表之應用經驗. 中華民國神經精神醫學會會刊, 4, 10. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45091 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 前言:工作者角色會談根據人類職能模式發展而來,為半結構化之會談。當中包含會談與標準化之評分表格。工作者角色會談被用來評估傷病或長期失能之工作者,以了解工作者重返職場之社會心理與環境支持度。工作者角色會談之評分表一共有16項,分別涵蓋個人歸因、興趣、價值、習慣、角色與環境六個內容範疇。
研究目的:將英文版工作者角色會談中文化,並用於台灣精障者以驗證其信、效度。 研究方法:本研究採用正翻、反翻與委員會的方式對工作者角色會談進行翻譯,以建立中文版工作者角色會談(Worker Role Interview-Chinese version, WRI-C)。評分定義的部分包含項目與評分標準,共112項。第一次正翻後修正的項目共有26項,佔所有項目之23.21%。經過反翻後,再次對11項進行修訂,佔所有項目之9.82%。之後,進行第二次反翻並確定文意相似度,建立中文版初試版本。為了建立WRI-C之效度,由一位職能治療師對100位年紀18至65歲之精障者進行台大症狀量表、世界衛生組織生活品質量表—臺灣簡明版、職能自我評估、貝氏憂鬱量表第二版、WRI-C、加拿大職能表現測驗、人類職能模式篩選量表與意志量表之施測。另外,前40位受測者於施測後6~13天內,再次接受WRI-C之施測以建立再測信度。 資料分析:本研究使用WINSTEPS(3.56版)、AMOS(7.0版)與SAS(9.1版本)進行信、效度驗證分析。信度的部分,使用加權kappa係數對WRI-C各項目原始分數進行分析,以了解兩次量測的一致性(agrrement)。並使用WRI-C各範疇之羅序分數進行組內相關係數(Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)分析,以了解再測信度。建構效度的部分,使用羅序分析模式及驗證性因素分析進行檢驗。羅序分析除了可以驗證建構效度外,還可將量表之原始分數轉換為等距分數。同時效度的部分,使用WRI-C各範疇之羅序分數分別對相關評估工具進行皮爾森相關係數(Pearson’s correlation coeffincient)之分析。最後使用變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)檢驗不同工作能力之個案於WRI-C各範疇得分之差異,以驗證區辨效度。 結果:除「同事的看法」外,各項加權Kappa均為0.4到0.6之間,顯示具有可接受之項目一致性。ICC值的部分,WRI-C整體量表為0.76、意志範疇為0.69、習慣範疇為0.65與環境範疇為0.71,顯示具有可接受之再測信度。建構效度方面,研究結果顯示可將WRI-C分成意志、習慣與環境三種建構。意志、習慣範疇具有可接受之建構效度,環境範疇則較差。同時效度方面,WRI-C意志範疇分別與世界衛生組織生活品質問卷-臺灣簡明版的心理範疇、職能自我評估自我部分、加拿大職能表現測驗、意志量表及人類職能篩選量表有顯著低度到高度正相關;WRI-C習慣範疇與人類職能篩選量表、職能自我評估自我部分具有顯著中度正相關;WRI-C環境範疇與職能自我評估環境部分具顯著中度正相關;另外,三個範疇均與貝氏憂鬱量表具顯著中度負相關,與台大症狀量表不具顯著相關,表示WRI-C各範疇具有可接受至良好之同時效度。依工作能力分組,不同組間之WRI-C習慣與環境範疇之分數具有顯著差異,由事後檢定得知其主要差異來自於「進行職業訓練,合併就業輔導」與「進行庇護性之工作,合併任務導向之治療性團體活動」、「未接受工作訓練,接受任務導向之治療性團體活動」兩組的不同,顯示WRI-C的習慣與還就範疇具有良好之區辨效度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The Worker Role Interview (WRI) is a semi-structured interview rating scale developed based on the Model of Human Occupation. The WRI can be used to evaluate the psychosocial and environmental components related to return to work for those persons with injury or chronic disease or disability. The worker role interview contains six content areas including personal causation, interest, value, habit, role and environment, totaled as 16 items.
Objectives: The purposes of this study Included: to translate the worker role interview into Chinese according to two-stage translation procedure; to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the worker role interview. Method: We adapted “Forward translation”, “Back translation” and “Committee approach” to arrive at the final Chinese version. For the test of the psychometric qualities of the worker role interview, one hundred subjects with mental illness were recruited to participate in the study. The National Taiwan Hospital Syndrome Scale(NTUSC), World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF Taiwan version(WHOQOLBREF-TW), Occupational Self Assessment(OSA), Beck Depression Invetory II(BDI-II), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure(COPM), Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool(MOHOST) and Volition Questionnaire (VQ) were used to investigate the concurrent validity of the worker role interview. A set of forty subjects within the whole sample were tested for the test retest reliability study. Data analysis: Comfirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were used to examine the construct validity of the scale. Correlational analysis was applied for concurrent validity. Intraclass correlation coefficient and weighted kappa were utilized for test retest reliability. Finally, the analysis of variance was used for known group validity. We applied the SAS (version 9.0), Amos (version 7.0) and WINSTEPS (version 3.56) computer programs for data analysis. Results: The WRI-C contains volition, habituation and environment domains. Except for environmental domain which needs to be modified in the future to fit the measurement model, volition and habituation domains demonstrated qualitity of unidimentionality.The test-retest reliability of the WRI-C is acceptable. The concurrent validity of the volitional and habituation domains of the WRI-C were supported by its significantly moderate to high correlation with related masures. Finally, there were significant differences of the two domains of the WRI-C among three groups of persons with varying level of functioning which supported the known group validity of the WRI-C. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:04:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96429010-1.pdf: 1674699 bytes, checksum: b72b0a3da0144b8d0cf7e74e7323289a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
英文摘要 III 目錄 V 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 X 附錄目錄 XI 第壹章、 序論 1 第貳章、 文獻回顧 2 第一節、 台灣與國外精障者就業現況 2 第二節、 影響精障者重返職場之心理社會因子 3 第三節、 就業能力相關之評估工具 4 第四節、 工作者角色會談及相關研究 9 第五節、 評估工具之翻譯與發展 12 第六節、 應用現代測驗理論於工具之發展 14 第七節、 研究假設 15 第參章、 研究方法 16 第一節、 研究對象 16 第二節、 研究工具 16 1. 簡短式智能測驗(Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE) 16 2. 台大症狀量表 16 3. 世界衛生組織生活品質問卷-臺灣簡明版(the World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF Taiwan version, WHOQOLBREF-TW).. 17 4. 職能自我評估(Occupational Self Assessment, OSA) 17 5. 貝氏憂鬱量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory version II, BDI-II)….. 18 6. 加拿大職能表現測驗(Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM) 18 7. 人類職能模式篩選量表(Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool, MOHOST) 19 8. 意志量表(Volitional Questionnaire, VQ) 19 第三節、 研究過程 20 第四節、 資料分析 20 1、 再測信度 21 2、 建構效度 21 3、 同時效度 23 4、 區辨效度 24 第肆章、 結果 26 第一節、 工具翻譯 26 第二節、 人口學變項統計 29 第三節、 再測信度 30 第四節、 建構效度 31 1、 意志範疇之建構效度 31 2、 習慣範疇之建構效度 32 3、 環境範疇之建構效度 33 第五節、 同時效度 35 1、 WRI-C與台大症狀量表 35 2、 WRI-C與WHOQOL BREF-TW 35 3、 WRI-C與VQ 36 4、 WRI-C與OSA 36 5、 WRI-C與BDI-II 36 6、 WRI-C與COPM 36 7、 WRI-C與MOHOST 36 第六節、 區辨效度 37 第伍章、 討論 38 第陸章、 結論 43 參考文獻 44 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 中文版工作者角色會談之心理計量品質研究—以台灣精障者為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Psychometric study of the Chinese version of the Worker Role Interview for Persons with Psychiatric Disorder in Taiwan. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾麗英(Lyinn Chung),陳貞夙(Jen-Suh Chern) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 工作者角色會談,人類職能模式,羅序分析,精障者,心理計量性質, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Worker Role Interview,Model of Human Occupation,Rasch analysis,psychiatric disorder,psychometric property, | en |
dc.relation.page | 118 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-02-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。