請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45054
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柴惠敏 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jui-Min Tai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 戴瑞敏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:02:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-03-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-02-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allen, M.K., Cuddeford, T.J., Glasoe, W.M., DeKam, L.M., & Lee, P.J. ( 2004 ). Relationship between static mobility of the first ray and first ray, midfoot, and hindfoot motion during gait. Foot and Ankle International, 25(6), 391-396.
Birke , J.A., Franks , B.K., & Foto, J.G. (1995). First ray joint limitation, pressure, and ulceration of the first metatarsal head in diabetes mellitus. Foot and Ankle International, 16(5), 277-284. Buell, T., Green, D.R., & Risser, J. (1988). Measurement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 78(9), 439-448. Bolgla, L.A., & Malone, T.R. (2004). Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism: a biomechanical link to clinical practice. J Athl Train, 39(1), 77-82. Cornwall, M.W., Fishco, W.D., McPoil, T.G., Lane , C.R., & O'Donnell, D. (2004). Reliability and validity of clinically assessing first-ray mobility of the foot. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 94(5), 470-476. Cote, K.P., Brunet, M.E., Gansneder, B.M., & Shultz, S.J. (2005). Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. Journal of Athletic Training, 40(1), 41-46. Dye, R.W. (2007). A strapping: The Journal of the National Association of Chiropodists-Podiatrists and Pedic Items, November 1939. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 97(4), 282-284. Fleiss, J.L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY, USA: Wiley and Sons. p.p. 1–32. Glasoe, W.M., Allen, M.K., & Yack, H.J. (1998). Measurement of dorsal mobility in the first ray: elimination of fat pad compression as a variable. Foot and Ankle International, 19(8), 542-546. Glasoe, W.M., Yack, H.J., & Saltzman, C.L. (1999). Measuring first ray mobility with a new device. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(1), 122-124. Glasoe, W. M., Yack H. J., & Saltzman, C.L. (2000). The reliability and validity of a first ray measurement device. Foot and Ankle International, 21(3), 240-246. Glasoe, W.M., Allen, M.K., Kepros, T., Stonewall, L., & Ludewig, P.M. (2002). Dorsal first ray mobility in women athletes with a history of stress fracture of the second or third metatarsal. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 32(11), 560-565. Glasoe, W.M., Allen, M.K., Saltzman, C.L., Ludewig, P.M., & Sub;ett, S.H. (2002). Comparison of two methods used to assess first-ray mobility. Foot and Ankle International, 23(3), 248-252. Glasoe, W.M., Getsoian, S., Myers, M., Komnick, M., & Kolkebeck, D. (2005). Criterion-related validity of a clinical measure of dorsal first ray mobility. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 35(9), 589-593. Glasoe, W.M., Grebing, B.R., Beck, S., Coughlin, M.J., & Saltzman, C.L. (2005). A comparison of device measures of dorsal first ray mobility. Foot and Ankle International, 26(11), 957-961. Grebing, B.R. & Coughlin M.J. (2004). The effect of ankle position on the exam for first ray mobility. Foot and Ankle International, 25(7): 467-475. Harradine, P.D. &. Bevan, L.S. (2000). The effect of rearfoot eversion on maximal hallux dorsiflexion: A preliminary study. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 90(8),390-393. Hick, J. H. (1953). The mechanism of the foot, I. The joints. Journal of Anatomy, 87,345-357. Hicks J.H. (1954). The mechanics of the foot, II. The plantar aponeurosis and the arch. Journal Anatomy, 88, 25-30. Hopson, M.M., McPoil, T.G., & Cornwall, M.W. (1995). Motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: Reliability and validity of four measurement techniques. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 85(4), 198-204. Huang, C.K., Kitaoka, H.B., An, K.N., & Chao, E.Y. (1993). Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot and Ankle, 14, 353-357. Jones, C.P., Coughlin, M.J., Pierce-Villadot, R., Golano, P., Kennedy, M.P. et al. (2005). The validity and reliability of the Klaue device. Foot and Ankle International 26(11): 951-956. Kase, K., Hashimoto, T., & Okane, T. (1996) Kinesio taping perfect manual. Tokyo, Japan, Kinesio Taping Association. Keenan, A.-M. & Tanner C.M. (2001). The effect of high-Dye and low-Dye taping on rearfoot motion. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 91(5), 255-61. Ker, R.F., Bennett, M.B., Bibby, S.R., Kester, R.C., & Alexander, R.C. (1987). The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 325: 147-149. Khamis, S. & Yizhar, Z. (2007). Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait and Posture, 25(1), 127-134. Kim, J.Y., Keun H.S., Tai, L.K., Won, Y.K., & Seon, J.J. (2008). A simpler device for measuring the mobility of the first ray of the foot. Foot and Ankle International, 29(2), 213-218. Klaue, K., Hansen, S.T., & Masquelet, A.C. (1994). Clinical, quantitative assessment of first tarsometatarsal mobility in the sagittal plane and its relation to hallux valgus deformity. Foot and Ankle International, 15(1), 9-13. Lexell, J.E. & Downham, D. Y. (2005). How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(9), 719-723. Landorf, K.B., Radford, J.A., Keenan, A.-M., & Redmond, A.C. (2005). Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term management of plantar fasciitis. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 95(6), 525-530. Lange, B., Chipchase, L, & Evans, A. (2004). The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 34(4), 201-209. Lee, K. T. & Young K. (2001). Measurement of first-ray mobility in normal vs. hallux valgus patients. Foot and Ankle International, 22(12), 960-964. McPoil, T.G. & Cornwall, M.W. (1996). Relationship between three static angles of the rearfoot and the pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 24(5), 309-314. Morton (1924). Evolution of the longitudinal arch of the human foot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American version, 6, 56-90. Mueller, M.J., Host, J.V., & Norton, B.J. (1993). Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 83(4), 198-202. Munuera, P.V., Dominguez, G., Palomo, I.C., & Lafuente, G. (2006). Effects of rearfoot-controlling orthotic treatment on dorsiflexion of the hallux in feet with abnormal subtalar pronation: A preliminary report. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 96(4), 283-289. Nawoczenski, D.A., Baumhauer, J.F., & Umberger, B.R. (1999). Relationship between clinical measurements and motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, American Version, 81A, 370-376. Neumann, D.A. (2010). Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier. Paton, J.S. (2006). The Relationship Between Navicular Drop and First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Motion. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 96(4), 313-317. Phillips, R. D., Law, E. A., & Ward, E.D. (1996). Functional motion of the medial column joints of the foot during propulsion. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 86(10), 474-85. Prentice, W.E. (2004). Rehabilitation techniques for sports medicine and athletic training, 4th ed., New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill. Radford, J.A., Burns, J., Buchbinder, R., Landorf, K.B., & Cook, C. (2006). The effect of low-Dye taping on kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic variables: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 36(4), 232-241. Roukis T.S. & Landsman, A.S. (2003). Hypermobility of the first ray: A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 42(6), 377-390. Russo, S.J., & Chipchase, L.S. (2001). The effect of low-Dye taping on peak plantar pressures of normal feet during gait. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47, 239-244. Saltzman, C.L., Nawoczenski, D.A., & Talbot, K.D. (1995). Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 45-49. Scranton, P.E., Pedagena, L.R., & Whitesel, J.P. (1982). Gait analysis: Alterations in support phase forces using supportive devices. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 10, 6-11. Shirk, C., Sandrey, M.A., & Erickson, M. (2006). Reliability of first ray position and mobility measurements in experienced and inexperienced examiners. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(1), 93-101. Steven R. & Irvin, R. (1983). Sports medicine: prevention, evaluation, management, and rehabilitation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall. Stovitz, S.D. & Coetzee, J.C. (2004). Hyperpronation and foot pain. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 32(8), 19-26, . Taranto, M.J., Taranto, J, Bryant, A., & Singer, K.P. (2005). Radiographic investigation of angular and linear measurements including first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and rear foot to forefoot axis angle. The Jounral of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 44(3), 190-199. Vicenzino, B., Franettovich, M.M., McPoil, T.G., Russell, T., & Skardoon, G. (2005). Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 939-943. Walker, M. & Fan H.J. (1998). Relationship between foot pressure and foot type. Foot and Ankle International, 19(6), 379-383. Winter, D.A. (2009). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 4th New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons. Whitaker, J.M., Augustus, K., & Ishii, S. (2003). Effect of the low-Dye strap on pronation-sensitive mechanical attributes of the foot. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 93(2): 118-23. 鄭悅承, 2007。軟組織貼紮技術。台北,合記。 陳英郎, 1995。肌內效貼布法--運動篇。台北,中華健康生活與運動協會。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45054 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 第一趾節係指由第一蹠骨及第一楔狀骨所組成的足部功能單位,在足部承重活動時扮演極重要的角色。內旋足者的第一趾節處於較背屈位置,其過大的活動度影響足部的正常活動,進而形成傷害。常見的保守療法是低位岱氏貼紮,雖可改善足底內側過多的壓力、支撐內縱足弓,以改善臨床症狀;但貼紮對第一趾節功能的影響從未有實證研究佐證。主要是因缺乏良好的量測第一趾節的工具,過去雖有數名學者提出量測方法,但有些過於複雜,有些則信度不高,故本研究團隊研發出信、效度較高的改良式趾節量尺。本研究即使用改良式趾節量尺與三維動作分析系統來測量第一趾節活動度與推蹬動作時的功能角度,藉以探討彈性低位岱氏貼紮對內旋足者第一趾節的影響。其具體目標有二:其一是探討彈性低位岱氏貼紮對內旋足者於無承重時之第一趾節位置與活動度的影響;其二是探討彈性低位岱氏貼紮對內旋足者於承重時之第一趾骨肢節角度與第一蹠趾關節角度的影響。
本研究屬於便利抽樣、前瞻性研究、擬試驗分析、順序隨機、前後測研究的設計。總計收集受試者23名,皆為內旋足者。本研究主要測試項目為使用改良式趾節量尺於坐姿進行第一趾節活動度測試與使用三維動作分析系統於站立進行推蹬測試,所有測試皆在同一日進行。每名受試者以隨機順序方式,在有貼紮與無貼紮的兩個狀況下接受測試,中間間隔20分鐘。兩個狀況的量測內容相同,皆為先接受第一趾節活動度測試,量測矩下正中位置時的第一趾節位置與活動度;再接受推蹬測試,分析第一蹠骨肢節角度與第一蹠趾關節角度。所有的常態分佈的連續數資料皆以配對t檢定分析贴紮的效益,而非常態分佈則以曼惠特尼U檢定分析。所有的統計皆在SAS9.13版中進行,顯著水準訂在α= 0.05,而檢定力則訂在0.8。 本研究結果顯示,彈性低位岱氏貼紮使內旋足者於無承重時之第一趾節位置改變至較接近正中的位置,並顯著的降低其過多的背屈活動度。於承重時,第一蹠骨與地面間的肢節角度不會有變化,但是貼紮則會顯著的增加內旋足者第一蹠趾關節角度。顯示在第一蹠骨與地面的角度不變的狀況下,從皮膚黏貼的彈性低位岱氏貼紮會改變第一蹠趾關節的使用情形,而使之不易出現夾擠的現象,而利於行走的推進。本研究的前導研究,為改良式趾節量尺於第一趾節活動度測試的高信效度,也提供佐證。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | First ray is defined as a functional unit which is composed of the first metatarsal and first cuneiform bones. It plays an important role during weight-bearing activities, especially at the midstance and propulsive phases during ambulation. A pronated foot is usually associated with dorsiflexed first ray, developing foot pain, abnormal gait pattern, or injuries to other weight-bearing joints. Although low-Dye taping is used clinically to treat first ray disorders, there has been no evidence-based research to explore its effects on first ray mobility. Lack of a valid and reliable clinical measurement tool makes the research be difficult. In literature review, some authors used a complicated setup to measure first ray mobility while some used less reliable tools. Our research team modified the first ray ruler and found its high reliability in 2007. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to examine the effects of elastic low-Dye taping on first ray mobility using modified first ray ruler and motion analysis system in individuals with pronated foot. The objectives were (1) to compare the differences in first ray position and mobility between with and without elastic low-Dye taping in individuals with pronated foot and (2) to compare the differences in the segmental angle of the first metatarsal bone and the angle of the metatarsophalangeal joint between with and without elastic low-Dye taping in individuals with pronated foot.
The present research was a convenience sampling, prospective, quasi-experimental, randomized-order, and pretest/posttest design. Twenty-three persons with pronated foot participated in this study. The position of the first ray at the subtalar neutral position as well as dorsal and plantar mobility of the first ray were measured at the sitting position using a modified first ray ruler while the segmental angle of the first metatarsal bone and first metatarsophalangeal angles during push-off were measured using motion analysis system on the same day. Each participant received those two tests under two conditions, with or without taping, in a random order and with a 20-min rest interval in between. For each condition, the first ray mobility test was performed first and then the push-off test. All data with normal distribution were examined using the paired t-tests to compare the differences between taping and non-taping conditions whereas those with non-normal distribution were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical analyses were executed using SAS v.9.13. The significant level was set at α = 0.05 while the power was at 0.8. The results showed that application of elastic low-Dye taping changed the first ray position to a more plantarflexed position for these participants and returned to their nearly normal mobility in non-weight–bearing condition. Elastic low-Dye taping also significantly increased first metatarsophalangeal joint angle in weight–bearing condition only based on the similar segmental angle of the first metatarsal bone during push-off motion. Additionally, the reliability and validity tests for the modified ruler prior to this experiment also provides a powerful evidence to support that the modified first ray ruler presents a high reliability and validity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:02:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R94428002-1.pdf: 7364317 bytes, checksum: 2ee8a4ec309ebe224ffcad0e439802f1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書------------------------------------------ii
誌謝-----------------------------------------------------iii 中文摘要--------------------------------------------------vi 英文摘要------------------------------------------------viii 目錄------------------------------------------------------xi 圖目錄---------------------------------------------------xiv 表目錄----------------------------------------------------xv 第一章、前言---------------------------------------------- 1 第一節、研究背景與動機------------------------------------ 2 第二節、研究目的------------------------------------------ 5 第三節、研究問題與研究假說-------------------------------- 6 第四節、名詞解釋------------------------------------------ 7 第二章、文獻回顧------------------------------------------13 第一節、第一趾節的構造與力學------------------------------13 第二節、低位岱氏貼紮--------------------------------------16 第三節、第一趾節活動度之量測------------------------------18 第三章、研究方法------------------------------------------21 第一節、研究設計------------------------------------------22 第二節、受試者--------------------------------------------22 第三節、介入方法------------------------------------------23 第四節、實驗儀器與量測工具--------------------------------24 第五節、實驗步驟------------------------------------------26 第六節、資料處理------------------------------------------31 第七節、統計分析------------------------------------------32 第四章、結果----------------------------------------------34 第一節、改良式趾節量尺的再測信度--------------------------35 第二節、改良式趾節量尺的量測效度--------------------------37 第三節、受試者的基本資料----------------------------------38 第四節、彈性低位岱氏貼紮對第一趾節活動度測試的影響--------39 第五節、彈性低位岱氏貼紮對推蹬測試的影響------------------40 第五章、討論----------------------------------------------42 第一節、彈性低位岱氏貼紮對第一趾節活動度的影響------------43 第二節、改良式趾節量尺的信效度----------------------------44 第三節、本研究的優點與貢獻--------------------------------45 第四節、本研究的限制--------------------------------------46 第六章、結論----------------------------------------------48 圖--------------------------------------------------------49 表--------------------------------------------------------58 參考文獻--------------------------------------------------64 附錄一 臨床試驗受試者說明及同意書-------------------------72 附錄二 臺大醫院研究倫理委員會審查通過公文-----------------77 附錄三 受試者基本資料問卷---------------------------------79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 彈性低位岱氏貼紮對第一趾節活動度之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effect of Elastic Low-Dye Taping on First Ray Mobility | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 王淑芬 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹美華,施偉立 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 彈性貼紮,第一趾節,改良式趾節量尺,推蹬動作, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | elastic taping,first ray,modified first ray ruler,push-off, | en |
dc.relation.page | 80 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-02-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。