Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44690
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor練乃華(Nai-Hwa Lien)
dc.contributor.authorHsiu-Fen Chienen
dc.contributor.author簡秀芬zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T03:52:58Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-20
dc.date.copyright2010-07-20
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-07-05
dc.identifier.citation一、中文部分
1.黃麗霞(2002),「贈品促銷型式對消費者的知覺價值與購買意願之影響」,臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文
2.林怡君(2002),「贈品-主產品利益一致性與品牌權益對促銷效果影響之研究」,臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
3.鍾于心(2009),「促銷方案內容設計與消費者贈品選擇之關係-罪惡感與自我控制的干擾效果」,臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
二、英文部分
1.Alain d'Astous, Isabelle Jacob (2002), Understanding consumer reactions to premium-based promotional offers, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36, Iss. 11/12, 1270-1286
2.Alain d'Astous, Valerie Landreville (2003), An experimental investigation of factors affecting consumers' perceptions of sales promotions, European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 37, Iss. 11/12, 1746-1761
3.Alexander Todorov, Amir Goren, Yaacov Trope (2007), Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 473-482
4.Amos Tversky, Richard H Thaler (1990), Anomalies: Preference Reversals, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 201-211
5.Amos Tversky, Shmuel Sattath, Paul Slovic (1988), Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice, Psychological Review, Vol. 95, Iss. 3, 371-384
6.Brett A S Martin, Juergen Gnoth, Carolyn Strong (2009), Temporal construal in advertising: The Moderating Role of Temporal Orientation and Attribute Importance in Consumer Evaluations, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 38, Iss. 3, 5-19
7.Campbell, Leland and William D. Diamond (1990), Framing and Sales Promotion: The Characteristics of Good Deal, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 25-31
8.Chandon, Pierre, Brian Wansin and Gilles Laurent (2000), A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, Iss. 4, 65-81
9.Dommermuth, William P. (1989), Promotion: Analysis, Creativity and Strategy, 2nd ed., Boston, Mass. PWS-Kent Publishing Company
10.Elizabeth Gardener and Minakshi Trivedi (1998), A Communications Framework to Evaluate Sales Promotion Strategies, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 38, Iss. 3, 67-71
11.Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004), Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189
12.Fujita, K., Henderson, M., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006), Spatial distance and mental construal of social events, Psychological Science, 17, 278-282
13.George E. Belch and Michael A. Belch (2004), Advertising and Promotion, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill
14.Gollwitzer, P.M., & Moskowitz, G. (1996), Goal effects on action and cognition, In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 361-399
15.Higgins, E. T., & Trope, Y. (1990), Activity engagement theory: Implications of multiply identifiable input for intrinsic motivation, In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, 229-264
16.Klaus Fieldler (2007), Construal Level Theory as an Integrative Framework for Behavioral Decision-Making Research and Consumer Psychology, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 101-106
17.Kotler, P. and Turner, R.E. (1998), Marketing Management, 9th ed., Prentice Hall Canada, Scarborough
18.Kruglanski, A. W. (1975), The endogenous–exogenous partition in attribution theory, Psychological Review, 82, 387-406
19.Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. (2002), The effect of temporal distance on level of construal, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-535
20.Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998), The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18
21.Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006), Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: A construal level approach to the mental representations and judgments of similar and dissimilar others’ actions, Unpublished manuscript, New York University
22.Mariola Palazon and Elena Delgado-Ballester (2009), Effectiveness of Price Discounts and Premium Promotions, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 26, Iss. 12, 1108-1129
23.Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003), Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485-497
24.Pierre Chandon, Brian Wansink, and Gilles Laurent (2000), A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, Iss. 4, 65-81
25.Preston, R.H., Dwyer, F. and Rodelius, W. (1978), The effectiveness of bank premiums, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42, Iss. 3, 96-101
26.Quelch, John A. (1989), Sales Promotion Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.
27.Rossiter, JR. and Percy, L. (1997), Advertising, Communication and Promotion Management, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
28.Shimp, Terence A. (1997), Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects Integrated Marketing Communications, 4th ed., Harcourt Brace Chicago, Dryden Press.
29.Simonson, I., Carmon, Z. and O’Curry, S. (1994), Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales promotions on brand choice, Marketing Science, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, 23-40
30.Tal Eyal, Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope, Eva Walther (2004), The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 86, Iss. 6, 781-795
31.Tali Te'eni-Harari (2008), Sales Promotion, Premiums, and Young People in the 21st Century, Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 14, Iss. 1/2, 17-30
32.Thomas, M., Chandran, S., & Trope, Y. (2006), The effects of temporal distance on purchase construal, Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University
33.Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000), Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889
34.Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003), Temporal construal, Psychological Review, 110, 403-421
35.Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987), What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior, Psychological Review, 94, 3-15
36.Wakslak, C. J., Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006), The effect of temporal distance on the structure of the self concept, Unpublished manuscript, New York University
37.Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006), Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 641-653
38.Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman, Cheryl Wakslak (2007), Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 83-95
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44690-
dc.description.abstract實務界時常運用贈品作為促銷工具以吸引消費者目光及增加購買意願,然而學術界對於不同贈品形式的效果並未有整合性的結論,而『時間解釋理論』雖指出消費者在距離購買時點不同的時間距離下,考量的因素將有所不同,但尚未將研究拓展至贈品身上。因此,本研究結合此兩派理論,欲探討不同時間距離是否會影響消費者對於贈品理想性與實行性的衡量,因而反映在不同的贈品選擇上,並且在不同的贈品形式分類下探討時間距離的效果。
為了驗證假設,本研究透過二個不同贈品形式(直接贈品及延遲贈品、免費贈品及加價購贈品)的實驗,以單因子(時間距離)實驗設計方式,讓受測者針對二種贈品促銷方案(高理想性搭配低實行性、及低理想性搭配高實行性)進行選擇(Choice)及評估(Evaluation)之衡量,並經由實體及網路方式將問卷發放給以台灣大學為主的大學生,再藉由卡方分析與成對樣本t檢定對假設進行驗證。在檢驗本研究之假設後,歸納出以下結論:
一、當消費者面臨等價的直接贈品及延遲贈品促銷方案時,處於時間距離較遠之消費者會偏好選擇理想性較高、但實行性較低的延遲贈品方案,同時也會給予此方案較高的評價;而處於時間距離較近的消費者則會偏好選擇理想性較低、但實行性較高的直接贈品方案,惟對於二方案的評價並無差異。
二、當消費者面對非等價的免費贈品及加價購贈品促銷方案時,無論是否告知消費者其對於贈品存在明確需求,時間距離均不會影響消費者對於贈品促銷方案的選擇及評價。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBusinesses often use premiums as promotion tools to draw consumers' attention and increase their purchase intention. However, academic research has not come to a definitive conclusion about the effects of different premium types. 'Temporal Construal Theory' points out temporal distance changes people's response to future events, but the theory has not been applied to the preference of premiums. Combining these two theories, this study investigates if temporal distance influences consumers' assessment of the desirability and feasibility of premiums, which in turn influences the choices of premiums. Also, this study tries to look into the effect of temporal distance in different premium types.
This study adopts one-factor (temporal distance) experimental design in two studies with different premium types. Study 1 uses direct premium and delayed premium, while study 2 uses free premium and self-liquidating. 495 undergraduates participated in either paper-and-pen or web experiments. They indicate their preferences toward two premium promotions (high desirability combined with low feasibility/low desirability combined with high feasibility) in terms of choice and evaluation. Data were analyzed by chi-square analysis and paired t-test, and the results are as follows:
1.When facing equally priced direct premium and delayed premium promotions, consumers in the distant future prefer to choose delayed premium promotion with high desirability and low feasibility and give it better evaluation at the same time. As for consumers in the near future, they prefer to choose direct premium promotion with low desirability and high feasibility, but there is no difference in their evaluation for the two promotions.
2.When consumers face not-equally-priced free premium and self-liquidating promotions, temporal distance does not influence their choice and evaluation for promotions no matter whether they are told that they have need for the premiums or not.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:52:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R97741004-1.pdf: 3120868 bytes, checksum: bf36004615c522b2ef2bdfd82ce402b0 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節、贈品促銷活動(Premium Promotion) 4
第二節、解釋水平理論(Construal Level Theory) 7
第三節、時間解釋理論(Temporal Construal Theory) 10
第四節、理想性(Desirability)及實行性(Feasibility) 12
第三章 研究架構與實驗方法 15
第一節、研究架構 15
第二節、研究設計 16
第三節、抽樣方法 22
第四節、實驗步驟 23
第四章 研究結果分析 24
第一節、實驗一結果分析 24
第二節、實驗二A結果分析 30
第三節、實驗二B結果分析 34
第四節、研究結果總結 39
第五章 結論與建議 40
第一節、研究結論與討論 40
第二節、行銷意涵 45
第三節、研究限制 47
第四節、未來研究建議 49
參考文獻 51
附錄 56
附錄一、前測問卷 56
附錄二、實驗一問卷(實體問卷) 58
附錄三、實驗二問卷(網路問卷) 61
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject贈品促銷zh_TW
dc.subject理想性zh_TW
dc.subject實行性zh_TW
dc.subject時間距離zh_TW
dc.subject贈品形式zh_TW
dc.subjectTemporal Distanceen
dc.subjectPremium Typeen
dc.subjectPremium Promotionen
dc.subjectFeasibilityen
dc.subjectDesirabilityen
dc.title時間距離對於消費者選擇贈品促銷方案之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of Temporal Distance on Consumers’ Choices of Premium Promotionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳建維,沈永正
dc.subject.keyword時間距離,理想性,實行性,贈品促銷,贈品形式,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTemporal Distance,Desirability,Feasibility,Premium Promotion,Premium Type,en
dc.relation.page67
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-07-06
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.05 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved