Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44688
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor許圳塗(Dr. Chou-Tou Shii)
dc.contributor.authorChian-Ting Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳茜庭zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T03:52:56Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-13
dc.date.copyright2010-07-13
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-07-06
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
李淑真. 1997. 百香果胚乳組織培養不定芽及體胚誘導之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
阮明淑. 1986. 亞洲型百合種球形態觀察及其花期調節. 國立台灣大學園藝研究所碩士論文.
吳淑華. 2001. 基因型、滲透壓劑、ABA及fluridone對百合微體繁殖小鱗莖葉片型態發育之影響. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
金石文. 1995. 百合屬之種源保存、遺傳歧異性分析及其種源利用與評估. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所博士論文.
胡適宜. 1990. 被子植物胚胎學. p171-190. 曉園出版社. 台北.
張淯茱. 2007. 石蒜雙核型雜種45S rDNA基因與近同源重組變異研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
許圳塗. 1978. 台灣原生百合生長習性及栽培利用之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝系編印.
許圳塗、鄭免、陳世賢. 1987. 台灣百合簇生早熟性狀及栽培利用. 園藝作物產期調節研討會專集. p19-26.
許圳塗、金石文、阮明淑. 1991. 亞洲型百合之預生、預定生長習性及其促成栽培. 園藝作物產期調節研討會專集 II. p103-113
許圳塗、金石文、阮明淑. 2002. 百合. 財團法人台灣區花卉發展協會.
郭小鶯. 1996. 群間雜交百合早熟性、耐熱性及稔性之表型表現與評估. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
劉秋芳. 1999. 二倍體香蕉胚乳培養器官再生及體胚發生之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
陳世賢. 1984. 台灣百合與鐵炮百合種間雜交及核型分析. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
曹燕慧. 2004. 石蒜屬雙核型雜種幼花培養之植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
陳孝銘. 2003. 外加Abscisic acid、Osmotica及Fluridone對百合組培苗小鱗莖葉片發育型之影響. 國立台灣大學園藝研究所碩士論文
陳秀婷. 2005. LA型雜交種百合組培苗簇呈栽培之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
陳春賓. 2008. 百合遠緣雜種LA及LO之稔性特性及多倍體誘導. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
黃鈴如. 2003. 石蒜胚乳組織程序性凋零及其挽救培養與再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
鄭免. 1983. 台灣百合實生苗簇生習性及影響生長發育因子之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
鄭免、許圳塗. 1984. 苗期溫度、低溫及光週處理對台灣百合抽莖即開花之影響. 中國園藝. 30:50-58.
劉蓁蓁. 1990. 亞洲型、鐵炮型和東方型百合群間雜種親合性及遺傳標誌. 國立台灣大學園藝研究所論文.
Adams, K. L. 2007. Evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid and hybrid plants. Jour. Hered. 98: 136-141.
Adams, K. L., R. Cronn, R. Percifield, and J. F. Wendel. 2003. Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 8: 4649-4654.
Affonso, V. R., H. R. Bizzo, C. L. S. Lace, and A. Sato. 2009. Influence of growth regulators in biomass production and volite profile in vitro plantlets of Thymus vulgarisL. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 6392-6395.
Agurttaz, P., A. Paffern, I. Delvallee, P. V. D. Linde, and G. J. de Klerk. 1990. The development of dormancy in bulblet of Lilium speciosum generated in vitro. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 22: 167-172.
Alexander, M. P. 1980. A versatile stain for pollen, fungi, yeast, and bacteria. Stain Technol. 55: 13–18.
Andrade, L. B., S. Echeverrigaray, F. Fracaro, G. F. Pauletti, and L. Rota. 1999. The effect of growth regulators on shoot propagation and rooting of common lavender (Lavandula vera DC). Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 56: 79–83.
Asano, Y. 1983. Random distribution of the number of chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids of Lilium. Cytologia. 48: 803-809.
Asano,Y. 1984. Fertility of a hybrid between distantly related species in Lilium. Cytologia. 49: 447-456.
Assani, A., D. Chabane, R. Haicour, F. Bakry, G. Wenzel, and F. Wehr. 2005. Protoplast fusion in banana (Musa spp.): comparison of chemical (PEG: polyethylene glycol) and electrical procedure. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 83: 145-151.
Barba-Gonzalez, R., A. C. Lokker, K. B. Lim, M . S. Ramanna, and J. M. Van Tuyl. 2004. Use of 2n gametes for the production of sexual polyploids from sterile Oriental × Asiatic hybrids of lilies (Lilium). Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1125-1132.
Benniamin, A., V. S. Manickam, M. Johnson, and L. H. Joseph. 2004. Micropropagation of Crataeva magna (Lour.) DC-a medicinal plant. Indian J. Biotechnol. 3: 136–138.
Biuvier, L., F. R. Fillon, and Y. Lespinasse. 1994. Oryzalin as an efficient agent for chromosome doubling of haploid apple shoots in vitro. Plant Breed. 113: 343-346.
Bonnier, F. J. M. and J. M. Van Tuyl. 1997. Long term in vitro storage of lily:effects of temperature and concentration of nutrients and sucrose. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 49: 81-87.
Bopana, N. and S. Saxena. 2009. In vitro regeneration of clonally uniform plants of Crataeva magna: a high value medicinal tree by axillary branching method. New Forests. 38: 53-65.
Brewbaker, J. L. and B. H. Kwack. 1963. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Amer. J. Bot. 50: 859-865.
Caperta, A. D., M. Delgado, F. Resseurreicao, A. Meister, R.N. Jones, W. Viegas, and A. Houben. 2006. Colchicine-induced polyploidization depends on tubulin polymerization in c-metaphase cells. Protoplasma. 227: 147-153.
Carvalho, J. F. R. P., C. R. Carvalho, and W. C. Otoni. 2005. In vitro induction of polyploidy in annatto (Bixa orellana). Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 80: 69-75.
Chao, I. L., C. L. Cho, L. M. Chen, and Z. H.Liu. 2001. Effect of indole-3-butyric acid on the endogenous indole-3-acetic acid and lignin content in soybean hypocotyls during adventitious root formation. J. Plant Physiol. 158: 1257-1262.
Chen, L. L. and S. L. Gao. 2007. In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in Astragalus membranaceus. Sci. Hort. 112: 339-344.
Chen, H. T., C. E. Kuo, and C. T. Shii. 2008. A forcing program for precocious LA hybrids lilies. Acta Hort. 766: 121-127.
Chen, M., M. Ha, E. Lackey, J. Wang, and Z. J. Chen. 2008. RNAi of met1 reduces DNA methylation and induces genome-specific changes in gene expression and centromeric small RNA accumulation in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Genet. Soci. Amer. 178: 1845-1858.
Chhun, T., S. Taketa, S. Tsurumi, and M. Ichii. 2004. Different behaviour of indole-3-acetic acid and indole-3-butyric acid in stimulating lateral root development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul. 43: 135–143.
Chin, S. W., C. E. Kuo, J. J. Liou, and C. T. Shii. 1997. Dominant expression on vigor and heat tolerance of Lilium longiflorum germplasm in distant hybridization with Asiatic and Oriental lilies. Acta Hort. 430: 495~502.
Comai, L. 2000. Genetic and epigenetic interactions in allopolyploid plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 387-399.
Comber, H. F. 1949. A new classification of the genus Lilium. N. A. L. S. Year Book. 13: 86-105.
Conklin, R. L. 2001. Recent advances in the role and biosynthesis of ascorbic acid in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 24: 383-394.
Crespel, L., S. Ricci, and S. Gudin. 2006. The production of 2n pollen in rose. Euphytica. 151: 155-164.
De Klerk G. J., V. D. Krieken, and J. C. de Jong. 1999. The formation of adventitious roots: new concepts, new possibilities. In Vitro Cell Dev. Plant. 35: 189–199.
De Mason, D. A. 1979. Function and development of the primary thickening meristem in the monocotyledon, Allium cepa L. Bot. Gaz. 140: 51-66.
Dimech, A. M., R. Cross, R. Ford, and P. W. J. Taylor. 2007. Micropropagation of Gymea Lily (Doryanthes excels Correˆa) from New South Wales, Australia. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 88: 157-165.
Driver, J. A. and G. R. Suttle. 1987. Nursery handling of propagules. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry. MartinusNyhoff, Dordrecht, pp 320–335.
Eeckhaut, T. G. R., S. P. O. Werbrouck, L. W. H. Leus, E. J. V. Bockstaele, and P. C. Debergh. 2004. Chemically induced polyploidization in Spathiphyllum wallisii Regel through somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 78: 241-246.
Eileen, W. E., Macfarlane, and N. G. Schmock. 1948. The colchicine and colchicines-like reaction as a possible response to enzymic poisoning. Science. 108: 712-713.
Escalona, M., J. C. Lorenzo, B. Gonzalez, M. Daquinta, J. L. Gonzalez, Y. Desjardins, and C. G. Borroto. 1999. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 743-748.
Escandón, A. S., L. M. Alderete, and J. C. Hagiwara. 2007. In vitro polyploidization of Mecardonia tenella, a native plant from South America. Sci. Hort. 115: 56-61.
Etienne, H. and M. Berthouly. 2002. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 69: 215-231.
Feher, A., T. Pasternak, D. Dutid. 2002. Activation of embryogenic cell division in leaf protoplast-derived alfalfa cells: the role of auxin and stress. Acta Biologica Szegediensis. 46: 13-14.
Francis, S. V., S. K. Senapati, and G. R. Rout. 2007. Rapid clonal propagation of Curculigo orchioides Gaertn., an endangered medicinal plant. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant. 43: 140143.
Gaj, M. D. 2004. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis induction and plant regeneration with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana (L.). Heynh. Plant Growth Regul. 43: 27-47.
Gaspar, T., C. Kevers, J. F. Hausman, J. Y. Berthon, and V. Ripetti. 1992. Practical use of peroxidase activity as a predictive marker of rooting performance of micropropagated shoots. Agronomie. 12: 757-765.
Goralski, G., M. Poielarsk, H. Slesak, D. Siwinska, and M. Batycka. 2005. Organogenesis in endersperm of Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward cultured in vitro. Acta Biol. Cra. Ser. 47: 267-281.
Gould, J., S. Banister, O. Hasegawa, M. Fahima, and R. H. Smith. 1991. Regeneration of Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadebse from shoot apex tissues for transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 10: 12-16.
Guo, W. W., Y. J. Cheng, C. L. Chen, and X. X. Deng. 2006. Molecular analysis revealed autotetraploid, diploid and tetraploid cybrid plants regenerated from an interspecific somatic fusion in Citrus. Sci. Hort. 108: 162-166.
Han, D. S. and Y. Niimi. 2008. Fertility restoring of interspecific hybrid between Lilium nobilissimum and L. regale by chromosome doubling. Acta Hort. 766:421-426.
Harrison, H. J. and Y. H. Harrison. 1970. Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain. Tech. 45: 115-120.
He, S. S., C. Z. Liu, and P. K. Saxena. 2007. Plant regeneration of an endangered medicinal plant Hydrastis canadensis L. Sci. Hort. 113: 82-86.
Helsely, C. 1983. New classification of Lilium species. N. A. L. S. Year Book. 36: 67-72.
Ho, C. W., W. T. Jlan, and H. C. Lai. 2006.Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from suspension cell cultures of Lilium x Formolongi hort. using a bioreactor system. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 42: 240-246.
Husain, M. K, M. Anis, and A . Shahzad. 2008. In vitro propagation of a multipurpose leguminous tree (Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb) using nodal explants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 30: 353–359.
Huang, L. S., P. C. Kuo, and C. T. Shii. 2006. The programmed cell death, rescuing culture and polyploid plantlet establishment in endosperm culture of spider lilies (Lycoris spp.). Acta Hort. 725: 101-106.
Jauhar, P. P. 2007. Meiotic restitution in wheat polyhaploids (Amphihaploids): a potent evolutionary force. Jour. Hered. 98: 188-193.
Jimene, E., N. Perez, M. D. Feria, R. Barbon, A. Capote, M. Chavez, E. Quiala, and J. Perez. 1999. Improved production of potato microtubers using a temporary immersion system. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 59: 19-23.
Josefsson, C., B. Dikes, and L. Comai. 2006. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Curr. Biol. 16: 1322-1328.
Kashkush, K., M. Feldman, and A. A. Levy. 2003. Transcriptional activation of retrptransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nat. Genet. 33: 102-106.
Kato, Y. 1978. Induction of adventitious buds on undetached leaves, excised leaves and leaf fragments of Helionopsis orientals. Physiol. Plant. 42: 39-44.
Keller, E. R. J. 1993. Sucrose, cytokinin, and ethylene influence formation of in vitro bulblet in onion and leek. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 40: 113-120.
Kim, E. K., E. J. Hahn, H. N. Murthy, and K. Y. Peak. 2003. High frequency of shoot multiplication and bulblet formation of garlic in liquid cultures. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 73: 231-236.
Komalavalli, N. and M. V. Rao. In vitro micropropagation Gymnema sylvestre-A multipurpose medicinal plant. 2000. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 61: 97-105.
Kooi, L. T., C. L. Keng, and C. T. K. Hoe. 1999. In vitro rooting of sentag shoots (Azadirachta excelsa L.) and acclimatization of the plantlets. In Vitro Cell Dev. Plant 35: 396–400.
Lee, H. S. and Z. J. Chen. 2001. Protein-coding genes are epigenetic regulated in Arabidopsis polyploids. Natl Acad Sci. 12: 6753-6758.
Lian, M. L., D. Chakrabarty, and K. Y. Peak. 2002. Growth and uptake of sucrose and mineral by bulblets of Lilium oriental hybrid ‘Casablanca’ during bioreactor culture. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 77: 253–257.
Lim, K. B., M. S. Ramanna, J. H. De Jong, E. Jacobsen, and J. M. Van Tuyl. 2001. Indeterminate restitution (IMR):A novel type of meiotic nuclear restitution mechanism detected in interspecific lily hybrids by GISH. Theor Appl. Genet. 103: 219-230.
Lim, K. B., T. M. Shen, R. Barba-Gonzalez, M. S. Ramanna, and J. M. Van Tuyl. 2004. Occurrence of SDR 2N-gametes in Lilium hybrids. Breeding Sci. 54: 13-18.
Liu, Z. and S. Gao. 2007. Micropropagation and induction of autotetraploid plants of Chranthemum cinerariifolium (Trev.) Vis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 43: 404-408.
Lokker, A. C., R. Barba-Gonzalez, K. B. Lim, M. S. Ramanna, and J. M. van Tuyl. 2005. Genotypic and environmental variation in production of 2n-gametes of Oriental× Asiatic lily hybrid. Acta Hort. 673: 453-456.
Matsuo, E. 1975. Studies on the growth and development of bulb in the Easter lily (Lilium longiflorum Thunb.) IV. Effect of temperature and light conditions on leaf emergence of scale bulblets. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44: 281-285.
Mim, E. K., E. J. Hahn, H. N. Murthy, and K. Y. Paek. 2003. High frequency of shoot multiplication and bulblet formation of garlic in liquid culture. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 73: 231-236.
Mitter, R. and V. Shulaev. 2004. Programmed cell death in plant: future perspectives, applications, and methods, p.251-264. In: J. Gary, Programmed cell death in plants. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. USA.
Moncousin, C. and T. Gaspar. 1983. Peroxidase as a marker for rooting improvement of Cyuara scolymus L. cultured in vitro. Biochemie und Physiologie der Pflanzen. 178: 263-271.
Morán G. P., R. Colque, F. Viladomat, J. Bastida, and C. Codina. 2003. Mass propagation of Cyrtanthus clavatus and Cyrtanthus spirais using liquid medium culture. Sci. Hort. 98: 49-60.
Morejohn, L. C., T. E. Bureau, J. M. Bajer, A. S. Bajer, and D. E. Fosket. 1987. Oryzalin, a dinitroaniline herbicide, binds to plant tubulin and inhibits microtubule polymerization in vitro. Planta. 172: 252-264.
Murashige, T and F. S. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.
Murch, S. J., C. Liu, R. M. Romero, and P. K. Saxena. 2004. In vitro culture and temporary immersion bioreactor production of Crescentia cujete. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 78: 63-38.
Muthan, S. B., T. S. Rathore, and V. R. Rai. 2006. Micropropagation of an endangered Indian sandalwood (Santalum aalbum L.). J. For. Res. 11: 203-209.
Nagai, C., J. J. Rakotomalala, R. Katahira, Y. Li, K. Yamagata, and H. Ashihara. 2008. Production of a new low-caffeine hybrid coffee and the biochemical mechanism of low caffeine accumulation. Euphytica. 164: 133-142.
Nagakubo, T., A. Nagasawa, and H. Ohkawa. 1993. Micropropagation of garlic through in vitro bulblet formation. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 32: 175-183.
Niimi, Y. 1985. Factors affecting the regeneration and growth of bulblets in bulb-scale culture of Lilium rubellum Barker. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 54: 82-86.
Nhut, D. T., N. T. M. Hanh, P. Q. Tuan, L. Nguyet, N. T. H. Tram, N. C. Chinh, N. H. Nguyen, and D. N. Vinh. Liquid culture as a positive condition to induce and enhance quality and quantity of somatic embryogenesis of Lilium longiflorum. 2006. Sci. Hortic. 110: 93-97.
Ouma, J. P., M. M. Young, and N. A. Reichert. 2004. Rooting of in vitro regenerated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is influence by genotype, medium composition, explant type and age. Afri. J. Bio. 3: 313-318.
Peloquin, S. J., L. S. Boiteux, P. W. Simon, and S. H. Jansky. 2008. A chromosome-specific estimate of transmission of heterozygosity by 2n gametes in potato. Jour. Hered. 99: 177-181.
Pires, J. C., J. Zhao, M. E. Schranz, E. J. Leon, P. A. Quijada, L. N. Luken, and T. C. Osborn. 2004. Flowering time divergence and genomic rearrangements in resynthesized Brassica polyploids (Brassicaceae). Biol. J. L. Soc. 82: 675-688.
Pline, W. A., K. L. Edmisten, J. W. Wilcut, R. Wells, and N. S. Allen. 2002. Use of digital image analysis, viability stains, and germination assays to estimate conventional and glyphosate-resistant cotton pollen viability. Crop Sci. 42: 2193-2200.
Puliga, S., C. Vazzana, and W. J. Davies. 1996. Control of crops leaf growth by chemical and hydraulic influences. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 529-537.
Purohit, S. D., A. Dave, and G. Kukda. 1994. Micropropagation of safed musli (Chlorophytum borivilianum), a rare Indian medicinal herb. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 39: 93–96.
Ramsey, J. 2007. Unreduced gametes and neopolyploids in natural populations of Achillea borealis (Asteraceae). Heredity. 98: 143-150.
Rathore, T. S., N. S. Deora, N. S. Shekhawat, and R. P. Sing. 1993. Rapid micropropagation of a tree of arid forestry Anogeissus acuminate. Biol. Plantarum. 35: 381-386.
Ramulu K. S., H. A. Verhoeven, and P. Dijkhuis. 1991. Mitotic blocking, micronucleation and chromosome doubling by oryzalin, amiprophosmethyl and colchicines in potato. Protoplasma. 160: 65-71.
Robinson, T. L. and B. H. Barritt. 1990. Endogenous abscisic acid concentration, vegetative growth and water relation of apple seedlings following PEG-induced water stress. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 991-999.
Roh, S. M. and H. F. Wilkin. 1977. Temperature and photoperiod effect on flower numbers in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102: 235-242.
Roles, S., C. Noceda, M. Escalona, J. Sandoval, M. J. Canal, R. Rodriguez, and P. Debergh. 2006. The effect of headspace renewal in a temporary immersion bioreactor on plantain (Musa AAB) shoot proliferation and quality. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 84: 155-163. 95: 239-243.
Saos, F. L. G-L., A. Hourmant, F. Esnault, and J. E. Chauvin. 2002. In vitro bulb development in Shallo (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group):effect of anti-gibberellins, sucrose and light. Ann. Bot. 89: 419-425.
Saruwatari, H., Y. S. Nakano, K. Nakano, M. Hiramatsu, Y. Ozaki, and H. Okubo. 2008. Interspecific lily hybrids with the ability to flower precociously and to produce multiple flower stalks from Lilium formosanum. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77: 312-317.
Saxena, S. and S. S. Bhojwani. 1993. In vitro clonal multiplication of 4-year-old plants of the bamboo, Dendrocalamus longispathus Kurz. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 29: 135–142.
Sharma, V. and M. A. Padhya. 1996. In vitro rapid multiplication and propagation of Crataeva nurvala. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 34: 243–246.
Shii, C. T. 1983. The distribution and variation of Lilium formasanum Wall and L. longiflorum Thumb. In Taiwan. The North American Lily society Yearbook. 36: 48-51.
Silkova, O., A. Shchapova, and V. Shumny. 2007. Role of rye chromosome 2R from wheat-rye substitution line 2R(2D)1 (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Saratovskaya 29-Secalecereale L. cv. Onokhoiskaya) in genetic regulation of meiotic restitution in wheat-rye ployhaploids. Russian J. Genetics. 43: 805-814.
Sivanesan, I. and B. R. Jeong. 2007. Direct shoot regeneration from nodal explants of Sida cordifolia Linn. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 43: 436-441.
Stimart, D. P. and P.D. Ascher. 1978. Tissue culture of bulb scale sections for asexual propagation of Lilium longiflorum Thunb. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103: 182-184.
Strachann, S. D. and D. A. Hess. 1983. The biochemical mechanism of action of the dinitroaniline herbicide oryzalin. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 20: 141-150.
Swanson, C. P. 1957. Cytology and cytogenetics. Prentice Hall, New Tersey.
Syage, P. M. 1980. The cultivation of lily species in Britain. Lilies. P. 16-20. Universe Books New York.
Syro, T., T. Yupsanis, H. Zafiriadis, and A. Economou. 2004. Activity and isoforms of peroxidases, lignin and anatomy, during adventitious rooting in cutting of Ebenus cretica L. J. Plant Physiol. 161: 69-77.
Thomas, T. D. and R. Chaturvedi. 2008. Endosperm culture: a novel method for triploid plant production. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 93: 1-14.
Thorpe, T. A. and D. D. Meier. 1972. Starch metabolism, respiration, and shoot formation in tobacco callus cultures, Physiol. Plant. 27: 365-369.
Tosca, A., R. Pandolfi, S. Citterio, A. Fasoli, and S. Sgorbati. 1995. Determination by flow cytometry of the chromosome doubling capacity of colchicine and oryzalin in gynogenetic haploids of Gerbera. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 455-458.
Van Aartrijk, J. and G. J. Blom-Barnhoorn. 1980. Effect of sourcose, mineral, salts, and some organic substances on the adventitious regeneration in vitro of plantlets from bulb-scale tissue of Lilium speciosum “Rubrum”. Acta Hort. 109: 297-302.
Van Tuyl, J. M. 1983. Effect of temperature treatment on the scale propagation of Lilium longiflorum‘White Europe’and Lilium בEnchantment’. HortScience. 18: 754-756.
Van Tuyl, J. M., A.V. Dijken, A, H. S. Chi, K. B. Lim, S.Villemoes, and V. Kronenburg, B.C.E. 2000. Breakthroughs in interspecific hybridization of lily. Acta Hort. 508: 83-88.
Van Tuyl, J. M., R. Barba-Gonzalez, A. A. van Silfhout, K. B. Lim, and M. S. Ramanna. 2005. Meiotic polyploidization in five different interspecific Lilium hybrids. Acta Hort. 673: 99-105.
Veilleux, R. 1985. Diploid and polyploidy gametes in crop plant: Mechanisms of formation and utilization in plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev. 3: 252-288.
Varshney, A., V. Dhawan, and P. S. Srivastava. 2000. A protocol for in vitro mass propagation of Asiatic hybrids of lily through liquid stationary culture. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant. 36: 383-391.
Waara, S., A. Wallin, and T. Eriksson. 1991. Production and analysis of intraspecific somatic hybrid of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Science. 75: 107-115.
Wan, T., D. R. Duncan, A. L. Rayburn, J. F. Petolino, and J. M. Widholm. 1991. The use of antimicrotubule herbicides foe the production of doubled haploid plants from anther-derived maize callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 205-211.
Walia, N., A. Kaur, and S. B. Babbar. 2007. An efficient in vitro cyclic production of shoots from adult trees of Crataeva nurvala Buch. Ham. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 277–284.
Wu, H., S. Zheng, Y. He, G. Yan, Y. Bi, and Y. Zhu. 2007. Diploid female gametes induced by colchicine in Oriental lilies. Sci. Hort. 114: 50-53.
Yan, G., A. R. Ferguson, M. A. McNeilage, and B. G. Murray. 1997. Numerically unreduced(2n) gametes and sexual polyploidization in Actinidia. Euphytica. 96: 267-272.
Yamada, T. and W. Marubashi. 2003. Overproduced ethylene cause programmed cell death leading to temperature-sensitive lethality in hybrid seedlings from the cross Nicotiana suaveolens × N. tabacum. Planta. 217: 690-698.
Zhou, S., M. S. Ramanna, R. G. F. Visser, and J. M. Van Tuyl. 2008. Analysis of the meiosis in the F1 hybrids of Longiflorum × Asiatic (LA) of lilies (Lilium) using genomic in situ hybridization. J. Genet. Genomics. 35: 687-695.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44688-
dc.description.abstract本論文利用研究室所育成異源四倍體LO及LA (4n=48, 8M+40A)百合為參試材料,探討微體繁殖其影響再生及體外結球因子,組培苗促成栽培技術,評估其生長開花表現,以及複二元體化染色體配對行為及其可稔性。異源四倍體LO百合增殖培養基以0.1 mg L-1 NAA組合0.1 mg L-1 BA不定芽再生效率較高,每一迷你鱗片培植體可誘導再生5.0±0.9不定芽,而其小鱗莖發生則以鱗片葉型為主。結球培養基以MS+ 200 mg L-1 酵母抽取物+ 80 mg L-1 腺嘌呤硫酸+ 45 g L-1 蔗糖培養8週後,對形成總變型葉數效果較佳,內輪鱗片葉可得3.6±1.4枚,而外輪鱗片葉為1.6±0.9枚。利用短暫浸漬系統(temporary immersion system, TIS)培養異源四倍體LO百合小鱗片之不定芽發生。結果顯示將小鱗片以MS固體培養基添加0.1 mg L-1 NAA+0.1 mg L-1 BA培養9週後,浸漬頻率為每4小時打氣10分鐘,浸漬6分鐘,其可提高不定芽再生數為7.0±1.2個,變型葉則為7.6±2.1枚,鱗片葉佔5.3±1.4片。異源四倍體LA百合則以單獨添加0.1 mg L-1 NAA對小鱗片再生不定芽效果較好,其小鱗莖發育接種8週後,總變型葉可形成8.6±1.9枚,但以外輪鱗片居多為4.6±1.9。MS培養基添加活性碳有利小鱗莖形成較多比例鱗片葉數。另外以1/2MS+ 2 g L-1活性碳對小鱗莖根系建立有促進作用,或添加2 mg L-1 IAA對根發生有較好之效果。
組培苗促成栽培及生育評估,異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗期表現中強生長勢,涼溫有利鱗片葉形成,生長於25/20℃鱗片葉發生速率為0.4片/週。相對地異源四倍體LA選系苗期則偏向鱗片型生長,經冷溫5℃恆溫處理有助導向鱗片葉形成,但後續結球會呈鱗片與鱗片葉型交錯發生。異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗含8~10枚鱗片葉,經冬季自然低溫處理4週再移至生長溫度條件,對照二倍體有100%抽莖,而異源四倍體LO百合僅有20%。以15/13℃處理10週後,抽莖率可達76.9%,其對冷溫單位需求仍有待探討。異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗低溫處理後至抽莖、露蕾及開花所需之生育日數為95.3±11.1天,呈現中生性。從組培苗種植到開花總生育日數為251~273天,可將歸之為早熟性。觀賞性狀表現花被平伸寬瓣而對稱,質地厚而優美。異源四倍體LO百合減數分裂於前期I完全24 II有12.7%,平均配對則有21.2±3.8雙價體。花粉母細胞減數分裂產物之小孢子數平均為4.8個。顯示,染色體延遲分離及裂開分離,此等分裂異常性易招致染色體組不整數,及超額小型孢子形成。花粉活力以Alexander’s solution檢定為3.08%,稍比二倍體佳。異源四倍體LO百合年生球周徑約14~20.8cm,隨生長溫度而異,顯示其可發展一作兩收之潛力。採收的年生球打破休眠後促成栽培,其從種植到開花生育日數為102.4±9.7天,類似中早生性。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn this research, the rapid propagation and bulbing pattern of allotetraploid LO and LA (4n=48, 8M+40A) lilies was developed in vitro. The rosette growth and phase changes of vitroplant planting were conducted under various controlled conditions. The performance in morphological and ornamental characters was evaluated, and the amphidiploids chromosome pairing and fertility were also studied.
The efficently adventitious bud multiplication 5.0±0.9/mini-scale explants of allotetraploid LO lily was achieved on MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg L-1 NAA and 0.1mg L-1 BA. The modified leaf pattern of vitroplant bulbing was dominated in scale leaf type on MS medium supplemented with 200 mg L-1 yeast extract, 80 mg L-1 adenine sulfate and 45g L-1 sucrose, than total modified leaves have 3.6±1.4 of inner scale leaves and outer scale have only 1.6±0.9. The temporary immersion system (TIS) produced 7.0±1.2 buds/mini-scale explants, and tend to scale of allotetraploid LO given 10 min/4hr immersion time and the liquid medium containing 0.1 mg L-1 NAA and 0.1 mg L-1 BA. The maximal shoot multiplication rate of allotetraploid LA lily was5.9±0.6 buds/mini-scale explant on MS medium supplement with 0.1 mg L-1 NAA alone. Howeven, the subsequent bulbing was characterized with larger portion of outer scales and a few inner scale leaves. The scale leaf bulbing growth and development was enhanced on MS medium supplemented with 2 g L-1 activated charcoal. The rooting of allotetraploid LA lily bulblet was improved on 1/2 MS medium or added with 2.0 mg L-1 IAA.
The vitroplants of allotetraploid LO and LA lilies were growing at various phytotron temperatures. The rosette stage of allotetraploid LO lily mainly display scale leaf type bulbing. The unfolding rate of scale leaf was 0.4/week at 25/20℃ condition considered as middle high vigor. The allotetraploid LA lily was dominant in scale type bulbing, and could be enforced by precooling treatment. Subsequently, accompany with alternation of scale and scale leaf type bulbing.The green plants with 8-10 scale leaves of allotetraploid LO lily were exposed to nature winter cooling for 4 weeks obtained 20% shoot emergence, 15/13℃ precooling for 10 weeks obtained 76.92% shoot emergence. Contrast to the diploid LO lily that given 6 weeks precooling is saturated for shoot emergence. The total timing from shoot emergence to flowering was calculated 95.3±11.1 days, characterized as middle earliness. The total timing from planting to flowering was 251~273 days, showed as precocity. The graceful flowers appear symmetric, flatten and wild inner perianthus, and thick texture superior to diploid. The meiotic behavior of pollen mother cell was examined as 12.67% of 24 bivalents on prophase I, the average pairing was 21.2±3.8 bivalents. The average of meiotic product was 4.8. The result of chromosome delay disjunction and splitting division may conduct to aneuploid and extra microspore formation. The Alexander’s staining of pollen viability was 3.08%. The yearling bulb circumference of allotetraploid LO lily was 14~20.8 cm, which revealed highly potential for two harvest of cut flower and bulb production in one cycle. The harvested yearling was also forcible to bloom by 102.4±9.7 days after planting, resemble to middle earliness.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:52:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R97628104-1.pdf: 16325858 bytes, checksum: 1f17031e7401d290323675b3bc5ecd90 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目 錄
口試委員名錄..............................................Ⅰ
誌謝......................................................Ⅲ
縮寫字....................................................Ⅴ
摘要......................................................Ⅶ
Summary...................................................Ⅸ
表目錄...................................................XIV
圖目錄...................................................XVI
前言(Introduction).........................................1
前人研究(Literature Review) ...............................3
一、百合種質來源與園藝特性.................................3
二、簇生習性與早熟機制之關係...............................4
三、多倍體化發生途徑.......................................8
四、遠緣種間雜種與多倍體化後表現型與基因表達特性..........13
五、多倍體植株之染色體行為與花粉稔性之關係................17
材料方法(Materials and Methods) ..........................19
一、參試材料..............................................19
二、試驗方法…............................................19
(一)異源四倍體LO與LA百合組織培養加速繁殖..................19
1.NAA及BA組合對小鱗片培養再生之影響.......................19
2.短暫浸漬系統(Temporary immersion system, TIS)利用對鱗片增生不定芽之影響............................................19
3.基質(固、液態)及蔗糖濃度對再生小鱗莖生長之影響..........20
4.有機氮源酵母抽取物、麩胺醯胺及腺嘌呤硫酸之添加物對再生小鱗莖之影響..................................................20
5.生長素、鹽類及活性碳對異源四倍體LA百合小鱗莖發根之影響..21
(二)異源四倍體LO及LA百合離瓶組培苗促成栽培................22
1.溫度對離瓶組培苗簇生期結球特性..........................22
2.綠株低溫處理方法及抽莖冷溫單位之需求....................22
3.離瓶組培苗栽培開花特性與品質評估........................23
4.異源四倍體LO百合年生球生育評估..........................23
(三)異源四倍體LO百合細胞學及可稔性分析....................23
1.體染色體核型分析........................................23
2.減數分裂染色體行為觀察..................................24
3.花粉活力之調查..........................................24
結果(Results) ............................................27
一、異源四倍體LO及LA百合不定芽再生與小鱗莖之發育結球特性..27
(一)小鱗片培養誘導不定芽再生..............................27
1.固體培養對異源四倍體LO及LA百合之再生不定芽影響..........27
2.短暫浸漬系統培養對再生小鱗莖數及生長速度之影響..........29
(二)蔗糖濃度與添加物對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖之影響....30
(三)生長素與基礎鹽類濃度對異源四倍體LA百合再生小鱗莖不定根形成之影響..................................................32
二、異源四倍體LO及LA百合離瓶組培苗之促成栽培..............33
(一)溫度對異源四倍體LO與LA型百合離瓶組培苗簇生苗期結球特性及鱗片葉形成之影響..........................................33
(二)低溫處理對異源四倍體LO百合抽莖及開花之影響............34
(三)二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合花朵及葉片特性之評估..........36
三、二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合年生球之生育評估..............37
四、減數分裂之染色體行為與花粉稔性之關係..................38
討論(Discussion) .........................................98
一、影響培植體再生及植株生長之因子........................98
(一)NAA與BA對鱗片再生不定芽及體外結球之影響...............98
(二)短暫浸漬系統對鱗片生長之影響.........................100
(三)蔗糖濃度對再生小鱗莖生長之影響.......................102
(四)有機氮源酵母抽取物、麩胺醯胺及腺嘌呤硫酸添加物對小鱗莖生長之影響.................................................103
二、生長素、基礎鹽類濃度與活性碳對異源四倍體LA百合小植株建立之影響...................................................104
(一)生長素對再生小鱗莖根系再生之影響.....................104
(二)基礎鹽類濃度及活性碳對再生小鱗莖根系再生之影響.......105
三、異源四倍體LO及LA百合簇生性與早熟性狀之表現...........106
四、低溫處理對簇生苗期之影響.............................108
五、溫度對抽莖到露蕾及開花之影響........................ 109
(一)抽莖到露蕾...........................................109
(二)露蕾到開花...........................................110
(三)異源四倍體LO百合植株及花朵形態.......................110
六、花朵數與種球周徑之關係...............................111
七、染色體行為與稔性關係.................................111
八、參考文獻.............................................114
九、附錄.................................................127

表目錄
表1. NAA 0.1 mg L-1組合不同濃度BA對異源四倍體LO及LA百合小鱗片培養再生及結球發育之影響................................39
表2. 短暫浸漬系統對異源四倍體LO及LA百合迷你鱗片培養再生與結球發之影響................................................40
表3. 不同蔗糖濃度與膠化物對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響..................................................41
表4. 不同蔗糖濃度與膠化物對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響..................................................42
表5. 有機氮類酵母抽取物、麩胺醯胺與腺嘌呤硫酸處理對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響..........................43
表6. 有機氮類酵母抽取物、麩胺醯胺與腺嘌呤硫酸處理對異源四倍體LA百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響..........................44
表7. 不同生長素處理對異源四倍體LA百合再生小鱗莖根發生之影響........................................................45
表8. 基礎鹽類濃度及活性碳添加對異源四倍體LA百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之效應..............................................46
表9. 異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗綠株低溫處理對其抽莖及開花生長之影響......................................................47
表10. 自然冷溫處理對二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗促成栽培生育日數及生長開花特性比較..................................48
表11. 綠株預冷處理(15/13℃)對異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗抽莖及開花生長之影響..............................................49
表12. 二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合年生球盆栽所需生育日數及開花特性........................................................50
表13. 二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合之植株生長及開花特性之表現評估........................................................51
表14. 溫度對異源四倍體LO百合組培苗栽培生長與鱗莖形成之影響........................................................52
表15. 異源四倍體LO(4x=48)百合花粉母細胞減數分裂前期I染色體配對之不同雙價體與單價體數發生頻率..........................53
表16. 異源四倍體LO百合花粉母細胞I及II減數分裂產物小孢子數目變化......................................................54
表17. 異源四倍體LO百合花粉活力檢定........................54

圖目錄
圖1. BA處理對異源四倍體LO與LA百合小鱗片培養不定芽發生之情形........................................................56
圖2. B A處理對異源四倍體LO與LA百合小鱗莖鱗片培養再生與鱗片葉結球之情形................................................58
圖3. 短暫浸漬系統及生長調節劑處理對異源四倍體LO百合小鱗莖鱗片培養於對再生及鱗片葉結球生長之情形......................60
圖4. 短暫浸漬系統及生長調節劑處理對異源四倍體LA百合小鱗莖鱗片培養再生及無葉結球生長之情形............................62
圖5. TIS及固體體外提供BA處理培養對異源四倍體LO及LA百合小鱗莖鱗片培養增殖效率之比較....................................64
圖6. 不同蔗糖濃度與膠化物對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響..................................................66
圖7. 不同蔗糖濃度與固液體培養基對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響............................................68
圖8. 不同有機氮類添加物對異源四倍體LO百合再生小鱗莖生長發育之影響....................................................70
圖9. 基礎鹽類濃度及活性碳對異源四倍體LA百合再生小鱗莖發生根之影響....................................................72
圖10. 異源四倍體LO及LA百合瓶內繼代培養結球情形............74
圖11. 溫度對異源四倍體 LO百合組培苗簇生期鱗片葉形成速率之影響........................................................76
圖12. 溫度對異源四倍體 LA百合組培苗簇生期變形葉鱗片葉形成速率之影響..................................................76
圖13. 異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗期多態型葉形態................77
圖14. 異源四倍體LO百合簇生苗結球不同葉型交替生長變化情形..78
圖15. 異源四倍體LA百合簇生葉生長之不同情形................80
圖16. 異源四倍體LA百合簇生苗期葉片型態多型性..............82
圖17. 二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合葉片氣孔大小與密度之差異....84
圖18. 二倍體及異源四倍體LO及LA百合之開花形態..............86
圖19. 二倍體與異源四倍體LO百合組培苗栽培年生球形成情形....88
圖20. 異源四倍體LO(4n=48, 8M+40A)百合花粉母細胞減數分裂小孢子形成程序................................................90
圖21. 異源四倍體LO百合花本母細胞減數分裂在前期I同源染色體配對變化之情形..............................................92
圖22. 異源四倍體LO百合減數分裂之不正常行為................94
圖23. 異源四倍體LO百合花粉母細胞減數分裂產物之小孢子數情形........................................................96
圖24. 二倍體及異源四倍體LO百合花粉檢定....................97
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subjectLO百合及LA百合zh_TW
dc.subject異源四倍體zh_TW
dc.subjectLO lily and LA lilyen
dc.subjectAllotetraploiden
dc.title異源四倍體LO及LA百合微體繁殖、組培苗促成栽培
及其生育評估
zh_TW
dc.titleMicropropagation, Vitroplant Forcing, and Performance Evaluation of Allotetraploid LO and LA Liliesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee戴廷恩(Dr. Ting-En Dai),金石文(Dr. Shih-Wen Chin),張耀乾(Dr. Yao-Chien Alex Chang),張祖亮(Dr. Tsu-Liang Chang)
dc.subject.keyword異源四倍體,LO百合及LA百合,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAllotetraploid,LO lily and LA lily,en
dc.relation.page128
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-07-06
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
15.94 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved