請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44412
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 余漢儀 | |
dc.contributor.author | Fen-Lan Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王芬蘭 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:56:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
衛生署(2006)精神衛生法修正草案總說明。 孔繁鐘(2000)DSM-IV精神疾病的診斷與統計。台北:合記出版社。 田禮瑋(2008)由家庭脈絡呈現重鬱症病友手足的聲音。台灣大學醫學院社會工作研究所碩士論文。 成令方(2002)醫用關係的知識與權力。台灣社會學刊,3:11-71。 余漢儀(2001)精障者社區復健模式探討--以台灣地區的四個康復之友模式為 例,中華心理衛生學刊,第十五卷,第二期,1-24。 李增祿 主編(1992)社會工作概論(增定版)。 台北:巨流。 李怡賢(2005)初診精神分裂症患者及其家屬求助行為之初探。台灣大學醫學院護理學研究所碩士論文。 李明濱(2002)實用精神醫學(二版)。台北:國立台灣大學醫學院 。 李錦彪(2003)精神病患主要照顧者之需要及其滿足程度之相關因素探討。台北醫學大學醫務管理學系。 吳嘉苓、黃于玲(2002)順從、偷渡、發聲與出走:「病患」的行動分析。台灣社會學刊。 第三期,P73-117。 宋麗玉(1998)精神病患社區化照顧之省思--社區化或機構化,選擇與困境?中華理衛生學刊,第十一卷,第四期,73-103。 沈志仁、張素凰(1991)精神病家屬的壓力源、應對策略與健康狀況--時間序列的探討。 中華心理衛生學刊,5,P103-122。 黃佩玲、李引玉、毛家舲(1991)探討出院精神病患家屬在居家照顧之附和及其影響因素。 護理雜誌(38),P77-88。 陳小慈(1992)台灣地區神醫療政策之分析--以精神衛生法為例。國立台灣大學社會學系研究所。碩士論文。 林憲(1982)臨床精神醫學。國立編譯館主編。台北。茂昌圖書。 林仕苾(2005)初診精神分裂症患者及其主要照顧者的健康照護需求。台灣大學護理學研究所碩士論文。 林綺雲(1998)醫病關係--人際互動理論的分析。諮詢與輔導,149,8-12。 夏慧玲(2006)精神分裂症患者主要照顧者因照顧患者引發需求之研究。亞洲大學長期照護研究碩士論文。 張苙雲(2003)醫療社會學--醫療社會學的探索(第三版)台北:巨流圖書公司。 張苙雲(1998)逛醫師的邏輯:求醫歷程的分析。台灣社會學刊,21,59-87。 黃秀雅(1999)醫病溝通中第三者的角色、影響及因應之分析。中正大學企管研究所碩士論文。 黃源協(2003)社區化照顧的理念基礎。收錄於社區化長期照護之發展策略,頁1-22。財團法人國家衛生研究院論壇。 黃維憲、曾華源、王慧君(1993)社會個案工作。台北:五南。 黃璦齡(2000)家庭系統作為慢性精神病患照顧主體的省思—論「過度使用家庭能力」與建構「替代家庭功能」。收錄於黃璦齡(2006)傾聽曠野裡的聲音-精神復健玉理模式,頁97-126。台北。記憶工程。 陳喬琪(1999)我國精神疾病的預後研究。台灣精神醫學,第十三卷,第二期,89-90。 曾文星、徐靜(2003)新編精神醫學。 台北:水牛出版社。 郭葉珍譯,Bernheim,K.F.&Lehman,A.F原著(2001)。家屬與精神病患。 台北:合記。 楊延光(1999)杜鵑窩的春天--精神病照顧手冊。張老師出版社。 楊秀儀(2000)誰來同意?誰作決定?從「告知後同意法則」談病人自主權的理論與實際:美國經驗之考察。台灣法學會「紀念世界人權宣言五十周年」學術研討會論文報告。 楊琇茹(2004)從病患自主權看病患家屬參與醫療決定之權限。中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。 葉肅科(2008)健康、疾病與醫療:醫療社會學新論。頁202-208。台北:三民出版社 趙雨龍(2003)弱勢社群的充權探討。載於趙雨龍、黃昌榮、趙維生合著,充權--新社會工作視界,頁251-260。台北:五南出版社。 魏芳婉、趙雨龍(2005)家連家精神健康教育課程在台灣實施之前驅性研究。 東吳社會工作學報,12,19-48。 簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)社會工作研究方法。 台北:巨流。 英文部分 Adams, J. R. & Drake, R. E.(2006). Shared Decision-Making and Evidence-Based Practice. Community Mental Health Journal, 42(1), 87-105. Brand, U. (2001). Mental health care in German: cares' perspectives. Acta Psychiatr Scand , l04 (401), 35-40. Bronfenbrenner (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531 Charles, C., & Gafin, A.(1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment. Social Science & Medicine, 49 (5), 651-661. Charies,C.,& Whelan,T,(1997).Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What dose it mean?(or it takes at least two.)Social Science & Medicine ,44(5), 681 -692. Cohen, C.A.(2004)Surrogate decision making: Special issues in Geriatric psychiatry. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(7), 454-457. Hamann, J., Leucht, S.,& Kissling, W.(2003). Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 107(6), 403-409. Hill.S.,& Laugharne,R.(2006).Decision making and information seeking preferences among psychiatric patients. Journal of Mental Healthy, 15(1), 75-84. Levine,C.,& Zuckerman,C. (2000).Hands On�Hands Off:Why health care professionals depend on families but keep them at arm's length. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,28(1), 5-18 Leonard Bickman,C.A.H., Denine Notthrup,Susan Sonichsen and Stephen Schilling.(1998).Long term outcomes to family caregiver empowerment. Journal of Child & Family Studies.,7(3), 269-282. Maguire,G.a.(2002).Comprehensive understanding of schizophrenia and its treatment. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.59(17)Supplement 5:S4-S11, 4-11. Resendez,M.G.,Quist,R.M.,& Matshazi,D.G.M.(2000).A longitudinal analysis of family empowerment and client outcomes. Journal of Child & Family Studies,9 (4), 449-460. Schauer, C., Everett, A., Vecchio, P., & Anderson, L.(2007).Promoting the value and practice of shared decision-making in mental health Care. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal,31 (1), 54-61. Say, R, M. M., Richard& Thomson.(2006)'Patients' perference for involvement in medical decision making: A narrative review.' Patient Education &Counseling, 60, 102-114. Singh , N. N., Curtis, W. J., Ellis, C. R., Wechsler, H. A., Best, A. M & Cohen, R(1997): Empowerment status of families whose children have serious emotional disturbance and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5, 223-229 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44412 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 家庭是我國醫療的基本單位,不論從衛生政策、就醫文化、家庭倫理,家屬都被視為責無旁貸的照顧者,扮演醫療中重要第三者的角色,協助生病家人的就醫與生活照顧等事務。近年來家屬充權的概念逐漸受到重視,國內外均有協助家屬參與醫療及使用能力提升的充權方案,但長久以來,病友被視為醫療照顧的主體,文獻探討時也發現,過去醫療決策參與的相關研究多以病友為主要探討對象,缺乏家屬聲音的呈現。考量我醫療文化的特殊性,家庭才是醫療決策的基本單位,本研究期待凸顯照顧者在醫療決策的參與角色,透過照顧者觀點了解家屬參與醫療決策的歷程。
本研究以個別深入訪談的方法蒐集九位照顧者的生命故事,透過他們對照顧經驗的回溯,來了解家屬面對醫療決策時機時,如何考量醫用互動和病友療自主權、如何平衡家庭整體和病友的個人需求、以及如何因應父權的醫療體系取得滿足的醫療內容等。 研究結果發現,家庭角色是選擇照顧者的主要條件,我國家庭通常是父母優先、長兄姐接替。照顧者以多元的型態展開醫療決策的參與行動,透過搜尋知識、表達意見和選擇決策來進行參與,疾病的階段影響照顧者與醫療專業面對決策時互動形態。參與決策時,病友的病情穩定、醫療配合度、自主求醫能力、決策議題等,影響照顧者對病友自主權的考量,但不可否認的事實是,面對疾病可能復發的焦慮,讓照顧者很難真正放手讓病友自主決策。不同家庭對於醫療決策的運作受到家庭權力結構和互動關係的影響,而有不同的參與型態,同時發現病友的居住安排是最容易受到家庭脈絡影響的決策議題。從個別專業人員的服務態度或是醫療體系的管理制度,都影響照顧者對服務使用的感受,照顧者嘗試不同的回應方式來爭取病友的醫療權益,但病友的配合意願卻是照顧者採取發聲或出走等積極回應行動能否成真的主要關鍵。研究最後依據上述的研究發現與結論,提出以下幾點建議: (一)從基礎教育扎根:建構生物醫學和社會人文並重的養成教育。 (二)由臨床訓練落實:強化面對服務對象時的互動與會談技巧。 (三)不只是家屬,專業人員也需要充權。 (四)建構全面與多元的醫療照護服務:增加醫療體系與家屬/病友團體的連結 (五)從醫療政策作起:正視照顧者的保健工作 (六)重新檢討服務流程,以多元的管道增加服務的可及性 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Family is the basic unit for national medical policy in Taiwan. Family members are recognized as the caregiver from the standpoints of national medical policy, medical culture, and family ethic. Family members are being portrayed as an important third party, and are responsible for the patients seeking medical and daily cares.
In recent years as the family empowerment becomes more emphasized, there are empowering methods designed, both in domestic and international environments, to assist the family members to enhance their participation in medical cares. However, the patients have been treated as the main party in the medical care system for a period of long time; the scenario that the patients are being treated as the main party of the medical decision and involvement of decision making while lack of participation from the family members is also shown during the process of this research. According to the special criteria that the family members are actually the basic party of the medical decision in our medical culture, it is expected that this research will emphasize the role of caregiver in the process of medical decision making, and to understand the process of medical decision making of family members from the caregivers’ point of view. In this research, nine cases of Schizophrenia patients are being studied through the method of individual depth interview. By reviewing from their experiences of care giving, it is the goal to understand how professional-user interaction and patient rights come into place when the family members are facing the moment of making medical decisions. It is also the intention of this study to understand how to reach balance between the needs of the patients and his/her families, and it is also important to understand how to access satisfying medical care under the patriarchy medical system. As the research reveals, parents of the family usually are recognized as the first priority to give care in our naiton’s families, followed by elder brothers and sisters. Various of methods such as researching (for options), expressing (ideas) and selecting (decisions) are being applied to by the caregiver in order to participate in the medical decisions. However, the phase of the sickness would usually affect the interaction between the patients and caregivers when it comes to making medical decisions. The stability of the patients, his/her cooperation to the medical process, his/her mobility to seek for medical care, issues of medical condition and knowledge level of medical information would play roles when evaluating the level of medical autonomy the patients would be given from the caregiver’s point of view. However, it is undeniable that the anxiety of the possibility of the sickness to return usually makes it difficult for the caregiver to grant the privilege of making medical decision to the patient him/herself. The family power structure and member-interaction within in families are the elements to affect the process and participation of making medical decisions. It is clear to see from the research that the living arrangement is affected the most by the family network. Professional care giving methods and medical system management can both make impact on how the care giver feels about the medical care. The care giver would try to apply different kinds or response to the current medical system in order to access most medical rights for the patients. According to the above findings and conclusions, the following suggestions are being made. (一)Ground root education is needed. It is important to provide the education that emphasizes both bio-medical profession and social humanitarian. (二)Hands-on training is vital. It is also vital to give the training of communication skills to the professionals. (三)Empowerment to professionals is also needed. Family members are not the only party who needs empowerment. (四)Establish all-around and varsity medical care system. It will increase the bond between the medical care system and patients/patients families. (五)Medical policy review is crucial. The mental health of care giver is undeniable. (六)Service process review is fundamental. Service should be equipped with more channels and should be more reachable. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:56:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R94330003-1.pdf: 2117337 bytes, checksum: 6acaa38e886b0b5b367c6550111d44bb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員審定書 --------------------------------------------------------------------- I 謝辭 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ II 中文摘要 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ III 英文摘要 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ V 第一章 研究源起及動機 -------------------------------------------------- 1 第二章 文獻探討 ----------------------------------------------------------- 5 第一節 精神分裂症及病友照顧者 -------------------------------------- 5 第二節 家屬照顧者及醫療參與 ----------------------------------------- 11 第三節 醫療使用者及醫療互動 ----------------------------------------- 18 第四節 結語 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 27 第三章 研究設計 ----------------------------------------------------------- 29 第一節 研究架構及提問 -------------------------------------------------- 29 第二節 樣本條件及資料蒐集 -------------------------------------------- 30 第三節 研究倫理及考量 -------------------------------------------------- 37 第四章 進入診間的家屬 -------------------------------------------------- 39 第一節 不同照顧者的故事 ----------------------------------------------- 39 第二節 成為醫療的使用者 ----------------------------------------------- 46 第三節 醫療參與和精障家屬團體 -------------------------------------- 59 第五章 家屬或病友的醫療決策? -------------------------------------- 65 第一節 完全代理決策 ----------------------------------------------------- 65 第二節 條件式的代理決策 ----------------------------------------------- 71 第三節 選項式的共同參與決策 ----------------------------------------- 72 第四節 病友自主決策 ----------------------------------------------------- 74 第六章 由家庭脈絡看照顧者的醫療參與 ----------------------------- 77 第一節 家庭中的醫療照顧者 -------------------------------------------- 77 第二節 家庭中的醫療決策 ----------------------------------------------- 85 第七章 家屬對醫療體系的詮釋及回應 -------------------------------- 96 第一節 照顧者對醫療使用的問題歸因 -------------------------------- 96 第二節 對醫療使用不滿的回應 ----------------------------------------- 103 第八章 研究結論及建議 -------------------------------------------------- 112 第一節 研究結論 ----------------------------------------------------------- 112 第二節 研究建議及限制 -------------------------------------------------- 115 第三節 研究者的學習及反思 -------------------------------------------- 120 參考文獻 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 123 【附件一】訪談大綱 -------------------------------------------------------------- 127 【附件二】對研究參與者的感謝與承諾 -------------------------------------- 129 圖目錄 圖1 精神分裂症的面貌 ---------------------------------------------- 6 圖3-1 研究架構圖 ------------------------------------------------------- 29 圖4-1 先鋒受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 39 圖4-2 思芸受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 40 圖4-3 阿治受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 41 圖4-4 小金受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 42 圖4-5 品仁受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 42 圖4-6 大信受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 43 圖4-7 阿原受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 44 圖4-8 阿坤受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 44 圖4-9 桂美受訪時的家庭狀態 ---------------------------------------- 45 圖5-1 完全代理的醫療決策 ------------------------------------------- 66 圖5-2 條件式的代理決策 ---------------------------------------------- 71 圖5-3 選項式的共同參與決策 ---------------------------------------- 72 表目錄 表2-1 新、舊版精神衛生法中與照顧者相關之條文 -------------- 8 表3-1 收案結果 ---------------------------------------------------------- 34 表3-2 受訪照顧者的基本資料 ---------------------------------------- 35 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 精神分裂症病友家屬參與醫療決策之初探 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Initial Approach on Family Members' Involvement on Medical Decision with Schizophrenia Patients | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾雯琦,鄭夙芬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 精神分裂症,醫療決策,家庭照顧者,家屬充權,決策參與, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Schizophrenia,medical decision,caregiver,family empowerment,making decisions, | en |
dc.relation.page | 129 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.07 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。