請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43541完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林晏州 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying-Chiao Fang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 方瀅喬 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:23:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-21 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 內政部營建署，（1996），全國公園綠地研討會總結報告，台北：內政部營建署。
2. 內政部營建署，（1997），都市公園綠地系統示範地區規劃，台北：內政部營建署。 3. 王小璘、司徒世瀚，（1997），都市開放空間及其活動型態之探討—以台中市都市開放空間為例，1997休閒、遊憩、觀光研究成果研討會—休閒遊憩行為，中華民國戶外遊憩學會，（pp145-162），台北：田園城市文化事業有限公司。 4. 王聖慈，（2007），暫留區環境熱舒適要求之實測調查，碩士論文，中國醫藥大學職業安全與衛生研究所，台中。 5. 王錦堂譯，Heimstra, N., W., & McFarling, L. H., 著，（1985），環境心理學，臺北：茂榮圖書有限公司。 6. 李明晃，（2004），都市公園與局地氣溫效應之關係研究—以台北市公園為例，碩士論文，中國文化大學景觀學研究所，台北。 7. 李沛良，（2004），社會研究的統計方法，台北：巨流圖書有限公司。 8. 李洋毅，（2006），綠化形態對都市熱島效應影響效果之研究，碩士論文，銘傳大學媒體空間設計研究所，台北。 9. 李凱傑，（2008），大學校園建築戶外空間與鋪面形式對溫濕環境影響之研究—以逢甲大學為例，碩士論文，逢甲大學建築研究所，台中。 10. 李建鋒，（2007），校園戶外環境熱舒適之研究-以大學、小學為例，碩士論文，逢甲大學建築研究所，台中。 11. 李魁鵬、林憲德、林立人、郭曉青、陳子謙，（1999），台灣四大都會區都市熱島效應實測解析(二)—夏季都市熱島時空分佈特性之初步解析—，建築學報，31，75-90。 12. 林憲德、李魁鵬、陳冠廷、林立人、郭曉青、陳子謙，（1999），台灣四大都會區都市熱島效應實測解析（一）—國內外都市熱島強度之比較—，建築學報，31，51-73。 13. 徐正杰，（2003），都市環境的綠化與透水效果對於微氣候之影響—以花蓮市區為例，碩士論文，國立東華大學環境政策研究所，花蓮。 14. 徐磊青、楊公俠，（2005），環境心理學—環境、知覺和行為，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 15. 莊家梅，（2008），夏季戶外空間熱舒適性之研究—以台南縣市、高雄市戶外空間為研究對象，碩士論文，國立成功大學建築研究所，台南。 16. 陳恩右，（2004），道路特性與都市局部熱島關係之研究—以台北市主要道路為例，碩士論文，中國文化大學景觀研究所，台北。 17. 郭柏巖，（2000），都市公園微氣候觀測解析—以台南市公園為例，碩士論文，國立成功大學建築研究所，台南。 18. 常懷生，（1995），建築環境心理學，台北：田園城市文化事業有限公司。 19. 黃定國（1992），建築基地開放空間暨避難空間設置之檢討與研究，台北：內政部建築研究所籌備處專題研究計畫成果報告。 20. 黃柔嫚，（1999），台北都市氣候特徵及其熱舒適度評估－以士林、萬華、古亭、松山為例，碩士論文，台灣大學園藝研究所，台北。 21. 黃裕能，（2008），靜宜大學校園鋪面與建築戶外空間對於溫溼環境影響之研究，碩士論文，逢甲大學建築研究所，台中。 22. 黃瑞隆、郭乃榕、蔡茹涵、陳家蓁、林家伃、朱妤珺，（2006），自然通風教室熱舒適要求調查，冷凍與空調，42，47-56。 23. 歐陽嶠暉，（2001），都市環境學，台北：詹氏書局。 24. 鄭師中譯，Helmut, E. L. 著，（1988），都市氣候學，台北：財團法人徐氏基金會。 25. 漢寶德譯，Proshanky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rwlin, L. G. 著，（2003），環境心理學—建築之行為因素，台北：境與象出版社。 26. 鍾基強、陳友剛、葉文裕、林守香，（1998），室內空調進排氣口配置熱舒適性探討，勞工安全衛生研究季刊，6(2)，87-102。 27. 聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶譯，Bell, P.A., Greene, T.C., Fisher, J.D., & Baum, A. 著，（2003），環境心理學，台北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司。 28. 小澤行雄、吉野正敏，（1965），小氣候調查法，東京：古今書院。 29. 吉野正敏，（1976），小氣候，東京：大明堂株式會社。 30. Ahmed, K.S. (2003). Comfort in urban spaces: defining the boundaries of outdoor thermal comfort for the tropical urban environments. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 103–110. 31. ASHRAE. (1992). ASHRAE standard 55: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE), Inc. 32. ASHRAE. (2005). ASHRAE Handbook Fundamentals (SI ed.). Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE), Inc. 33. Baker, N. (1993). Comfort in passive buildings. In Proceedings of Solar Energy and Buildings, Academy of Athens. 34. Baker, N. & Standeven, M. (1996). Thermal comfort for free-running buildings. Energy and Buildings. 23(3), 175-182. 35. Bedford, T. (1950). Environmental warmth and human comfort. British Journal of Applied Physics, 1(2), 33-38. 36. Brager, G.S., Fountain, M.E., Benton, C.C., Arens, E.A., & Bauman, F.S. (1994). A comparison of methods for assessing thermal sensation and acceptability in the field. Oseland, N.A., & Humphreys, M.A. (Eds.), Thermal Comfort: Past, Present and Future (pp. 17-39). Garston, UK: Building Research Establishment. 37. Brown, R.D., & Gillespie, T.G. (1995). Microclimatic landscape design: Creating thermal comfort and energy efficiency. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 38. Canter, D. (1977). The Psychology of Place. The Architectural Press Ltd., London. 39. Charles, K.E. (2003). Fanger’s Thermal Comfort and Draught Models. Ottawa: Institute for Research in Construction (IRC-RR-162). 40. Corgnati, S.P., Filippi, M., & Viazzo, S. (2007). Perception of the thermal environment in high school and university classrooms: Subjective preferences and thermal comfort. Building and Environment, 42(2), 951-959. 41. de Dear, R. (1995). Thermal comfort in air-conditioned office buildings in the tropics. In Standards for thermal comfort: indoor air temperature standards for the 21st century, Nicol F., Humphreys M., Sykes O. and Roaf S. (Eds.), Chapman and Hall, London. 42. Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Westerberg, U., Thorsson, S., & Lindberg, F. (2007). Climate and behavior in a Nordic city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(1-2), 72-84. 43. Fanger, P.O. (1970). Thermal comfort. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press. 44. Gagge, A.P., Stolwijk, J.A.J., & Saltin, B. (1969). Comfort and thermal sensation and associated physiological responses during exercise at various ambient temperatures. Environmental Research, 2(3), 209-229. 45. Gaitani, N., Mihalakakou, G., & Santamouris, M. (2007). On the use of bioclimatic architecture principles in order to improve thermal comfort conditions in outdoor spaces. Building and Environment, 42(1), 317-324. 46. Givoni, B. (1976). Man, climate and architecture. Applied Science Publishers, London. 47. Givoni, B., Noguchi, M., Saaroni, H., Pochter, O., Yaacov, Y., Feller, N., & Becker, S. (2003). Outdoor comfort research issues. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 77–86. 48. Greenwood, J.S., Soulos, G.P., & Thomas, N.D. (2000). Under cover: Guidelines for shade planning and design, Sydney, NSW Cancer Council and NSW Health Department. 49. Griffiths I.D., Huber J.W. and Baillie A.P. (1987). Integrating the environment. In Proceedings of the 1987 European conference on architecture, Steemers T.C. & Palz W. (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers for the Commission of the European Communities, Netherlands. 50. Gulyás, Á., Unger, J., Balázs, B., & Matzarakis, A. (2003). Analysis of the bioclimatic conditions within different surface structures in a medium-sized city (Szeged/Hungary). Acta Climatologica et Chorologica, 36-37, 37-44. 51. Hawkes, D., & Willey, H. (1977). User response in the environmental control system. In Transactions of the Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies, Vol. 2, Cambridge. 52. Höppe, P. (1999). The physiological equivalent temperature – a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. International Journal of Biometeorology, 43(2), 71-75. 53. Huang, J. (2007). Prediction of air temperature for thermal comfort of people in outdoor environments. International Journal of Biometeorology, 51(5), 375-382. 54. Karjalainen, S. (2007). Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments. Building and Environment, 42(4), 1594-1603. 55. Knez, I., & Thorsson, S. (2006). Influences of culture and environmental attitude on thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a public square. International Journal of Biometeorology, 50(5), 258-268. 56. Mallick, F.H. (1996). Thermal comfort and building design in the tropical climate. Energy and Building, 23(3), 161-167. 57. Martı´n, M.B.G. (2005). Weather, climate and tourism a geographical perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3), 571-591. 58. Mayer, H., & Höppe, P. (1987). Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 38(1), 43-49. 59. McIntyre, D.A. (1976). Thermal sensation. A comparison of rating scales and cross modality matching. International Journal of Biometeorology. 20(4), 295-303. 60. Nikolopoulou, M., Baker, N., & Steemers, K. (2001). Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Understanding the human parameter. Solar Energy, 70(3), 227-235. 61. Nikolopoulou, M., & Steemers, K. (2003). Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 95–101. 62. Nikolopoulou, M., & Lykoudis, S. (2006). Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Analysis across different European countries. Building and Environment, 41(11), 1455-1470. 63. Parsons, K.C. (2002). The effects of gender, acclimation, the opportunity to adjust clothing and physical disability on requirements for thermal comfort. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 593-599. 64. Spagnolo, J., & Dear, R. (2003). A field study of thermal comfort in outdoor and semi-outdoor environments in subtropical Sydney Australia. Building and Environment, 38(5), 721-738. 65. Spreiregen, P.D. (1965). Urban design: the architecture of towns and cities. New York: McGraw-Hill. 66. Stathopoulos, T., Wu, H., & Zacharias, J. (2004). Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate. Building and Environment, 39(3), 297-305. 67. Svensson, M.K. & Eliasson, I. (2002). Diurnal air temperatures in built-up areas in relation to urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. 61(1), 37-54. 68. Tankel, S.B. (1963). The Importance of Open Space in Urban Pattern. L. wingo Jr. ed., City and Space, Johns Hopkins Press. 69. Thorsson, S., Honjo, T., Lindberg, F., Eliasson, I., & Lim, E. (2007). Thermal comfort and outdoor activity in Japanese urban public places. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 660-684. 70. Thorsson, S., Honjo, T., Lindberg, F., Eliasson, I., & Lim, E. (2004). Thermal comfort conditions and patterns of behaviour in outdoor urban spaces in Tokyo. PLEA2004 – The 21st Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, (pp19-22). The Netherlands: Eindhoven. 71. Zacharias, J., Stathopoulos, T., & Wu, H. (2001). Microclimate and downtown open space activity. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 296-315. 72. Zacharias, J., Stathopoulos, T., & Wu, H. (2004). Spatial behavior in San Francisco’s plazas: the effects of microclimate, other people, and environmental design. Environment and Behavior, 36(5), 638-658. 73. Zambrano, L., Malafaia, C., & Bastos, L.E.G. (2006). Thermal comfort evaluation in outdoor space of tropical humid climate. PLEA2006 - The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, (pp.377-382). Geneva: Switzerland. 74. Zhang, Y., & Zhao, R. (2008). Overall thermal sensation, acceptability and comfort. Building and Environment, 43(1), 44-50. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43541 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究之主要目的在於瞭解都市公園微氣候變化對於使用者熱舒適度之影響，並同時探討個人特性對於熱舒適度之影響，調查地點於公園內之園區道路、兒童遊戲場、生態池、草坪及涼亭等五類主要實質環境，並將其區分為有無遮蔭環境，利用儀器測量以各測點之氣溫、輻射量、風速及相對濕度等微氣候數據，同時並藉由問卷訪談及觀察使用者之個人特性，以及民眾對於當下氣候條件之熱感知、舒適度及接受度的實際主觀感受。研究結果經由t檢定、變異數分析、相關分析、相關比及迴歸分析等統計方法來進行假設檢定，並建立以微氣候、環境屬性及個人特性為自變項之使用者熱舒適度預測模式。研究結果顯示，公園內部有無遮蔭之各測點環境之氣溫、輻射量、相對濕度及風速等微氣候變化具有顯著差異，而自然及人工遮蔭形式之差異對於微氣候亦具有顯著影響。微氣候方面以氣溫及輻射量對於熱舒適度評值具有顯著影響，其中氣溫及輻射量對於熱舒適度評值具有顯著相關性。熱舒適度評值間之關係方面，舒適度及接受度會受到熱感知評估結果而有所差異，而熱感知與舒適及接受度皆呈現中等相關程度。個人特性部份，年齡對於熱感知呈現負向關係，與舒適度及接受度呈現正向關係，而活動類型則對舒適度及接受度具有顯著影響。在熱感知預測模型中，氣溫、輻射量、測點環境及年齡等因素為有效的預測指標。由研究結果證實都市公園內不同環境配置所產生之微氣候差異對於使用者之熱舒適度感受具有顯著影響，因此建議透過環境改善當地之微氣候，進而達到改善使用者熱舒適度之效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purposes of this study was to understand the influences of microclimate on user’s thermal comfort in the urban park, and furthermore to investigate the influences of personal characteristics on thermal comfort. Field surveys were performed in the garden road, playground, eco-pond, lawn and pavilion of the urban park which in the sun and in the shade. Microclimate data were measured including air temperature, horizontal solar radiation, relative humidity and wind speed. Personal characteristics and assessments of microclimate in the moment with thermal sensation, comfort and acceptability were investigated by structured questionnaire. Statistical methods including T-test, One-way ANOVA, correlational analysis, correlation ratio and regression analysis were used to test the hypotheses and establish the thermal comfort predicting model with microclimatic, environmental and personal factors. The major results are summarized as follows: The layout and shading of each site were significant influences on air temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity and wind speed. There were significantly correlations in thermal comfort with air temperature and solar radiation. Thermal sensation were significantly influence the assessments of comfort and acceptability, and there were medium correlationships within thermal sensation and comfort and acceptability. In personal parameters, a siginificant negative correlation were found between age and thermal sensation, and the activity type were significant influences on assessments of comfort and acceptability. The results of the multiple regression analysis showed that air temperature, solar radiation, site planning and age had the most significant influence on the predictive model of thermal sensation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:23:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96628308-1.pdf: 4526766 bytes, checksum: e1bf2b4f10e10ea3ee4c1e8672448846 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄 ........................................................................................................................... I
表目錄 ........................................................................................................................ III 圖目錄 .......................................................................................................................... V 第一章 緒論 ............................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究緣起................................................................................................ 1 第二節 研究目的................................................................................................ 3 第三節 研究內容及流程.................................................................................... 4 第二章 文獻回顧 ....................................................................................................... 7 第一節 都市公園相關理論................................................................................ 7 一、都市公園之定義.................................................................................... 7 二、都市公園之功能.................................................................................... 8 第二節 都市氣候.............................................................................................. 10 一、都市氣候與都市熱島效應.................................................................. 10 二、台灣都市之氣候特徵.......................................................................... 12 第三節 環境知覺理論...................................................................................... 14 第四節 熱舒適度相關理論.............................................................................. 17 一、熱舒適度之定義.................................................................................. 17 二、熱舒適度評估方法.............................................................................. 18 三、相關實證研究...................................................................................... 23 四、預測模型.............................................................................................. 25 第五節 小結...................................................................................................... 27 第三章 研究方法 ..................................................................................................... 29 第一節 研究架構內容...................................................................................... 29 一、研究限制.............................................................................................. 29 二、研究架構.............................................................................................. 30 三、研究假設.............................................................................................. 31 第二節 研究地點.............................................................................................. 34 第三節 資料收集及方法.................................................................................. 40 一、問卷設計.............................................................................................. 40 二、資料收集方法...................................................................................... 41 第四節 資料處理與分析方法.......................................................................... 42 一、微氣候資料分析.................................................................................. 42 二、個人特性分析...................................................................................... 42 三、熱舒適評值分析.................................................................................. 42 四、研究假設檢定...................................................................................... 43 五、熱舒適狀態預測模式之建立.............................................................. 44 第四章 研究結果與討論 ......................................................................................... 47 第一節 微氣候分析.......................................................................................... 48 第二節 個人特性分析...................................................................................... 53 第三節 實質環境之微氣候分析...................................................................... 54 第四節 熱舒適評值分析.................................................................................. 58 一、熱感知評估.......................................................................................... 58 二、舒適度評估.......................................................................................... 64 三、接受度評估.......................................................................................... 69 四、熱感知與舒適度、接受度關係之檢定.............................................. 74 第五節 微氣候與熱舒適度關係之分析.......................................................... 76 第六節 個人特性與熱舒適度關係之分析...................................................... 84 第七節 熱舒適狀態預測模式.......................................................................... 86 第八節 假設驗證結果...................................................................................... 91 第五章 結論與建議 ................................................................................................. 93 第一節 結論...................................................................................................... 93 一、都市公園內部不同環境配置對於微氣候之影響.............................. 93 二、微氣候對於熱舒適度之影響.............................................................. 94 三、個人特性對於熱舒適度之影響.......................................................... 95 四、熱感知、舒適度與接受度之關係...................................................... 96 五、熱舒適度預測模型.............................................................................. 97 第二節 建議...................................................................................................... 98 一、公園配置之改善建議.......................................................................... 98 二、後續研究建議...................................................................................... 99 參考文獻 ................................................................................................................... 101 附錄一 研究調查問卷 ........................................................................................... 109 附錄二 台北氣象站氣候統計資料 ....................................................................... 110 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 都市公園微氣候對使用者熱舒適度影響之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Influences of microclimate on user’s thermal comfort in urban park | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 歐聖榮,張俊彥,鄭佳昆,陳惠美 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 熱舒適度,熱感知,舒適度,接受度,微氣候,都市公園, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Thermal comfort,Thermal sensation,Comfort,Acceptability,Microclimate,Urban park, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 117 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。