請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43424完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃恆獎 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Cheng Shen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 沈維正 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:55:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-14 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-06-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
1. 方世榮（2004），”公司策略及組織間關係管理之探討”，中原企管評論，第二卷第二期。 2. 方世榮，張嘉雯，黃識銘（2003），”夥伴關係長期導向之前置因素的探討－中小企業特質的干擾作用”，台灣管理學刊，第3卷第1期。 3. 方彥永（2003），”知識經濟體系下政府協助產業創新之研究-以業界開發產業技術計畫為例”，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所，未發表碩士論文。 4. 吳思華（2000），”策略九說”：臉譜出版。 5. 吳明隆（2006），”結構方程模式－SIMPLIS的應用”，台北：五南圖書。 6. 佘日新、許嘉文、陳厚銘（2003），”國際化資源聯結特性、能力提昇與企業產業網路地位之關係”，臺灣管理學刊，卷期�年月 3:2 民92.08 頁85-102。 7. 余民寧（2006），”潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用”，台北：高等教育。 8. 李安仁，李梅（2000），”企業核心競爭力分析與評價”，武漢工業大學學報，第22卷第2期。 9. 林盈旭（2003），”資源連結、關係能力、學習能力、供應商競爭優勢與績效關係之研究”，長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。 10. 林宸霆（2004），”專家系統在晶圓代工產業的發展關鍵要素–從台積電組織層級觀點探討”，國立交通大學管理學院，未發表碩士論文。 11. 邱皓政（2004），”結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用”，台北：雙葉。 12. 洪明偉（2000），”企業併購案中政府角色的探討：以台灣銀行業併購為例”，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所，碩士論文。 13. 施文玲（2007），”技專校院知識管理能力模式建構之研究”， 高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系, 未出版博士論文。 14. 徐作聖（2000），”創新政策概論”，台北：華泰文化事業出版公司。 15. 許嘉文（2001），”國際化資源聯結特性、能力提昇與企業產業網路地位之關係研究”，暨南國際大學國際企業學系碩士論文。 16. 許文秀（2002），”以產學夥伴關係建立台灣產業創新模式之研究”，國立交通大學經營管理研究所，未發表博士論文。 17. 陳燕美（2006），”國際企業建構供應商評選系統之研究-以被動元件為例”， 大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。 18. 陳怡如（2003）， “聲譽量表建立之研究”，實踐大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 19. 陳煥文（2000），”亞太地區各國國際商務仲裁制度在模範法重大議題上之比較研究”，國防管理學院法律研究所，未出版碩士論文。 20. 陳國書（2003），”公共工程履約爭議處理之研究”，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所，未出版碩士論文。 21. 黃榮發、張志銘、蔡宗珍（2000），”行政機關介入私權爭議之研究”，行政院研究發展考核委員會。 22. 經濟部工業局（2003~2007），”工業發展年鑑”。 23. 經濟部工業合作推動小組（2003~2008），委員會議資料。 24. 楊春鉀（2001）， “亞太地區各國國際商務仲裁制度在模範法重大議題上之比較研究”，國防大學法律研究所碩士論文。 25. 詹凱儒（2005），”後進地區國家參與系統產品之標準競爭研究”，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所，未發表碩士論文。 26. 蔡松霖（2005），”兩岸經貿關係之外部性問題與政府角色”，國立東華大學公共行政研究所，未出版碩士論文。 27. 蕭峰雄（1994），”我國產業政策與產業發展”，台北：植根雜誌社。 28. 龔本剛，朱磊（2005），”製造企業核心競爭力的主成分分析”，機械製造，43卷490期。 29. Abraham, C. and Anat, F. (2002), “The relationship between work and workplace attitudes and perceived external prestige”,Corporate Reputation Review, 5(1), 51-68. 30. Angeles, R. and Nath, R. (2001), “Partner congruence in electronic data interchange (EDI) - enabled relationships.” Journal of Business Logistics, 22:2, 109-128. 31. Armstrong, A., Foley, P., （2003）, “Foundations for a Learning Organization : Organization Learning Mechanisms”, Learning Organization, Vol.10, No.2, pp.74-83, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 32. Barnes, J.G. (2001), “Secrets of Customer Relationship Management, ” Hardcover. 33. Barney, J.B., 1990, The debate between traditional management theory and organizational economics: substantive differences or intergroup conflict? Academy of Management Review, 15, 382–393. 34. Beamish, Paul W. (1985), 'The Characteristics of Joint Ventures in Developed and Developing Countries,' Columbia Journal of World Business, 20(3), pp.13-19. 35. Beck, Ulrich. (1999), World Risk Society, Malden, MA: Blackwell. 36. Beecham, M.A. & Cordey-Hayes, M.(1998), “Partnering and Knowledge transfer in the U.K. motor industry,” Technovation, 18(3), pp.191-205. 37. Benham, A.; Benham, L.（2004） 'The costs of Exchange: An approach to measuring transactions costs.' In: Annual Conference of the International Society for the New Institutional Economics, 8, 2004, Tucson, Arizona. Disponível em: <http// www. isnie.org > 38. Bennett Morris and John Cadogan (2001),” Partner Symmetries, Partner Conflict and the Quality of Joint Venture Marketing Strategy: An. Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Marketing Management, 17: 223-256. 39. Berry, L.L., and Parasuraman,A.(1991),“Marketing Service-Competing Through Quality, ” New York: The Free Press. 40. Bloemer, J., & Odekerken-Schroder, G. (2002), “Store satisfaction and store loyalty explained by customer- and store-related factors.” Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, 15, 68-80. 41. Boddewyn, J.J. & Brewer, T.L.（1994）, International-business political behavior：New theoretical directions, Academy of Management Review, Vol.19, No. 1, pp. 119-143. 42. Bogozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. (1988),” On the evaluation of structural equation models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16: 74-94. 43. Bollen, Kenneth A. (1989), “Structural Equations with Latent Variables.” New York: Wiley. 44. Bove, L. L., and Johnson, L. W. (2001). “Customer relationships with service personnel: do we measure closeness,quality or strength?.” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 54,pp. 189– 197. 45. Brinkerhoff, Jennifer（2002）, “Assessing and Improving Partnership relationships and outcomes：a proposed framework”, Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, pp. 215-231. 46. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993), “Alternative ways of assessing model fit.” In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models , Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 47. Buitelaar, E.（2004）, “A Transaction-Cost Analysis of the Land Development Process,” Urban Studies. 41(13): 2539-2553. 48. Carmeli A. and Tishler A. (2005), “Perceived Organizational Reputation and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Industrial Enterprises,” Corporate Reputation Review, Vol.8, No.1, pp. 13-30. 49. Carmines, E.G. and McIver, J.P. (1981), “Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures,” In G.W. Bohrnstedt & E.F. Borgatta (eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues, 65-115, Beverly Hills, Calif : Sage. 50. Carrol, H Willaim（2004）”U.S. Defense Exports:Update on Offsets”, American Countertrade Association. 51. Caruana, A., ( 1997), “Corporate Reputation: Concept and Measurement”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. b No. 2. pp.109-118. 52. Chaudhuri, A.（2002）,” How Brand Reputation Affects the Advertising-Brand EquityLink,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 33-43. 53. Christopher, M. & Uta Juttner （2000）, “Developing strategic partnerships in the supply chain: a practitioner perspective,' European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6, pp. 117-127. 54. Chung, Chris Changwha and Paul W. Beamish.（2005）,' The impact of institutional reforms on characteristics and survival of foreign subsidiaries in emerging economies.' Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 35-62. 55. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152. 56. Countertrade & Offset, Vol. XVII, No.16, 1999. 57. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. （1999）,” An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution.” Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 522-537. 58. Das, T.K. & Teng, B.S. (2000), 'A resource based theory of strategic alliances', Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No.1, pp.31-61. 59. Davenport, Thomas H. & David W. De Long & Michael C. Beers（1998）,” Successful Knowledge management projects”, Sloan Management Review ,39(2), pp.43-57. 60. Delios, Andrew and Witold J. Henisz（2003）,' Political hazards, experience and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980-1998.' Strategic Management Journal, 24(11): 1153-1164. 61. Dowling, G. R. (1986). “Managing your Corporate Images.” Industrial Marketing Management, 15, 109-115. 62. Duncan, Charles , Deputy Secretary of Defense（1978）, General Policy on Compensatory Coproduction and Offset Agreements with Other Nations, memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments, Washington, D.C., 4 May. 63. Dwyer, F. R. & Tanner, J. F. (2001), Business Marketing. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 64. Dyer, J. H.著，洪明洲譯，2002，協同優勢，中衛發展中心。 65. Dyer, J.H. and W. Chu, 2000. The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies 31(2), 259-285. 66. Dyer, Jeffery H., Wujin Chu,（2003）,”The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance：Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea”, Organization Science, 14,1 67. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998), ”The relational view：Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage.” Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. Dyer, Jeffrey H. and Wujin Chu (2003).” The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea.” Organization Science 14(1): 57-68. 68. Egan, John（2002）, ” Relationship Marketing,” Pearson Education Limited. 69. Einwiller, Sabine (2003). “When reputation engenders trust: An investigation in business-to-consumer electronic commerce.” Electronic Markets – The International Journal of Electronic Commerce and Business Media, 13 (3), 196-209. 70. Eisenhour, John H.（1989）, Offsets in Military Exports: U.S. Government Policy: Extract of Remarks Presented to the Defense Industry Offset Association. DISAM Journal, 12:1, pp. 28-31. 71. Empson L.(2001). 'Introduction: Knowledge management in professional service firms.” Human Relations. 72. European Commission （2000）, “Innovation in a Knowledge-Driven Economy, special issue of Innovation and Technology Transfer”, The European Commission: Brussels. 73. Ezaki, M. (1995). Growth and structural in Asian countries. Asian Economic Journal, 9, 113-135. 74. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker, 'Evaluating structural equation models with unbervables and measurement error,' Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 39-50. 75. Frank L. Jeffries and Richard Reed (2000), “Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting”, Academy of Management Review ,Vol. 25, No.4, pp.873-882. 76. Friedman, Thomas L. （2000）, The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization: Books by Thomas L. Friedman. 77. Gandhi, Smiti(2004), “Knowledge management and reference services”, Journal of Academic Librarianship. Vol.30, Iss.5, pp.368-381. 78. Gianmario, V. & Emanuela, P. (2002), “A Dynamic Model of Customer Loyalty to Sustain Competitive Advantage on the Web,” European Management Journal Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 299–309. 79. Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi (1999), “FDI Policies under Shared Factor Markets,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 309-332. 80. Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., Manul Nunez-Nickel, and Isable Guiterrez (2001),“The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts,”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44(1), pp.81-95. 81. Gotsi Manto and Alan M. Wilson (2001), “Corporate reputation: seeking a definition” Corporate Communication: An International Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 p.p. 24-30 . 82. Guinet, Jean and Dirk Pilat(1999), “Promoting Innovation—Does It Matter?” OECD Observer, No.217/218 , pp.63-65. 83. Hafeez, Khalid, YanBing Zhang, and Malak Naila. (2002). “Determining Key Capabilities of a Firm Using Analytic Hierarchy Process.” International Journal of Production Economics,Vol. 76, pp. 39-51. 84. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). “Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.).” Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc. 85. Hall, R. (1992), “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp. 135-144. 86. Harrigan, K. R. (1998), “Strategic Alliances and Partner Asymmetries”, Cooperative Strategies in International Business. 87. Held, David & Anthony McGrew,（2002）,” Globalization/ Anti-Globalization “,Polity Press. 88. Hennart, Jean-François, Ming Zeng (2002), 'Cross-Cultural Differences and Joint Venture Longevity,' Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4), pp.699-716. 89. Hennart, J.F.（1991）, The Transaction cost theory of the multinational enterprise: The Nature of Transactional Firm, Routledge, pp. 90. 90. Hennig-Thuran, T. (2000), “Relationship quality and customer retention through strategic communication of customer skills.” Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1-3), 55-79. 91. Hitt, MA, RD Ireland and RE Hoskisson (1999). “Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization”, 3rd Edition. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing. 92. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis：conventional criteria versus new alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. 93. Huber, John D. and Charles R. Shipan. (2000),'The Costs of Control: Legislators, Agencies, and Transaction Costs.' Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol.25, pp. 25-52. 94. Hutt, M.D. et al.(2000), “ Defining the Social Network of a Strategic Alliance,” Sloan Management Review, 41(2):51-63. 95. Inkpen, Andrew C. and Paul W. Beamish (1997), 'Knowledge, Bargaining Power, and the Instability of International Joint Ventures,' Academy of Management Review, 22(1), pp.177-202. 96. Inkpen A.C.（2000）, “A note on the dynamics of learning alliance: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope”, Strategic Management Journal, 21（8）: 775-779. 97. Kaleka, A., 2002,“Resources and Capabilities Driving Competitive Advantage in Export Markets: Guidelines for Industrial Exporters,” Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp.273-283. 98. Kim, K., （1999）, “On Determinants of Joint Action In Industrial Distributor-Supplier Relationship : Beyond Economic Efficiency”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.16, pp.217-236. 99. Kim, W. C. and P. Hwang (1992), “Global Strategy and Multinationals Entry Mode Choice,” Journal of International Business Studies, pp.29-53. 100. Kotler, P. (2000), “Marketing management,” 10th edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 101. Kramer, Deborah and Bill Sain,（1992）, “Offsets In Weapons System Sales: A Case Study of the Korean Fighter Program”, Masters Degree Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. 102. Kraemer, Kenneth L. and Jason Dedrick. 2002 “Enter the Dragon: China Computer Industry”. Webpage: www.crito.uci.edu/git/publications/pdf/ EnterTheDragon.pdf 103. Lambe, CJ, and Spekman, RE (1997), “ Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: pp 102-116. 104. Lambert, M., Emmelhainz, A. and Gardner, T. (1996), “Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), pp.1-17. 105. Lane P., Salk J.E. & Lyles M.A.（2001）, “Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures”, Strategic Management Journal, 22:pp. 1139-1161. 106. Langevoort, Donald C.（2003）, “Taming the Animal Spirits of the Stock Markets: A Behavioral Approach to Securities Regulation”, 97 Nw. U. L. Rev. pp.135-153. 107. Lee, Chih-Ping、Lee, Gwo-Guang and Lin, Hsiu-Fen (2007) “The role of organizational capabilities in successful e-business implementation”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 677-693. 108. Lewis, J. D.(1990), “Partnerships for Profit:Structuring and Managing Strategic Alliance.” New York: The Free Press. 109. Liker, J. K.著，李芳齡譯，2005，實踐豐田模式，McGrawHill。 110. Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). “The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability：A longitudinal study.” Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317-338. 111. Luo, Yadong, Oded Shenkar, and Mee-Kau Nyaw (2001), 'A Dual Parent Perspective on Control and Performance in International Joint Ventures: Lessons From a Developing Economy,' Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), pp. 41-58. 112. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. W. (1996). “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.” Psychological Methods, vol. 1, pp. 130-149. 113. Mahajan, M. (1992). The overconfidence effect in marketing management predictions. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, pp. 329-342. 114. Maloni, M. and W.C., Benton., 2000.“Power influences in the supply chain”, Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), pp. 49-73. 115. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. and McDonald, R. P., “Goodness-of-Fit Indices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect of Sample Size,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, 1988, pp.391-410. 116. Marin, D. and M. Schnitzer (1995): Tying Trade Flows: A Theory of Countertrade with Evidence; American Economic Review, 85 (December). 117. Martin, Stephen（1996）, The Economics of Offsets, Harwood Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp.31. 118. Masten, Scott E.（1996） 'Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: Challenges, Progress, Directions.' in Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond. editor John Groenewegen, 43-64. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 朱舟、黃瑞虹譯，（2002）。 119. McKnight, DH, Cummings, LL and Chervany, NL, (1998), Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships, Academy of Management Review, 23(3). 120. Menard, Claude（1997）, Internal characteristics of formal organizations, Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar Publishing Co., pp.30-58. 121. Miller, Gary, (1992) Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy, New York: Cambridge University Press. 122. Miramon, J. (1982). Countertrade: A modernized barter system. The OECD Observer, No. 114, January, pp. 12-15. 123. Mirus, R. and Yeung, B.（1986）, Countertrade and Foreign Exchange Shortages: A Preliminary Assessment, Wettwirtschortliches Archiv, 122, pp. 543-545 124. Mirus, R. and Yeung, B.（2001）,The Economics of Barter and Countertrade, Edward Elgar, 2001 125. Nonaka, I. (1994),'A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.' Organization Science, 5(1), p14-37. 126. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi（1995）, “The Knowledge-Creating Company”, Oxford University Press. 127. Olins, W. (1990), “Corporate Identity, Making Business Strategy Visible through Design,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. 128. Parise, S. and Casher, A. (2003) “Alliance portfolios: designing and managing your network of business-partner relationships”, Academy of Management Executive 17(4): 25–39. 129. Peltier, J. W. and Westfall, J. (2000), “Dissecting the HMO-benefits managers relationship: What to measure and why”, Marketing Health Services, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.4-13. 130. Penrose, E. （1959）, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Third ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 131. Petty, Lieutenant Colonel Frank S.(1999),”Defencse Offsets: A Strategic Military Perspective”, The DISAM Journal, Summer. 132. Plessis, M. (2005), “Drivers of knowledge management in the corporate environment”, International Journal of Information Management, 25, 193–202. 133. Polanyi, M.（1966）, “The Tacit Dimension”, London:Routledge & Kegan Paul. 134. Prabhu, Jaideep, Rajesh Chandy, and Mark Ellis (2005), “The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic?” Journal of Marketing, 68 (January). 135. Prema Nakra（2005）, “COUNTERTRADE: A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO GLOBAL MARKETING”, Marist College, December, 2005. 136. Rao, Vithala R., Agarwal, Manoj K., and Denise Dahlhoff (2004), “How is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.68, pp. 126-141. 137. Rigdon, E.（1995）,“Necessary and Sufficient Identification Rule for Structural Models Estimated in Practice,” Multivariate Behavior Research (30:3), pp.359-383. 138. Rindfleisch, Aric, and Jan B. Heide, (1997) 'Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications', Journal of Marketing, 61(October), 30-54. 139. Sallis, Edward & Gary Jones（2002）,” Knowledge Management in Education”, London: Kogan Page Limited. 140. Sandy. D. Jap(1999), “Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes In Buyer- Supplier Relationship” ,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.(November),pp.461- 47. 141. Shenkar, O., and Yuchtman-Yaar, E.(1997).”Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: An interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing”, Human Relation, Vol. 59, No. 11,1361-1381. 142. Sikka, P.,（1996）,”Indigenous development and acquisition of technology and Indian perspective.” Technovation, 16（2）85-90. 143. Simchi-Levi, D. and Kaminsky, P. ,（2003）, “Design and Managing The Supply Chain”, McGRAW Hill. 144. Simon, J.D., （1982） “Political Risk Assessment: Past Trends and Future Prospects.” Columbia Journal of World Business, 62-71 145. Skarmeas D, Katsikeas CS, Schlegelmilch B. 2002. ” Drivers of commitment and its impact on performance in cross-cultural buyer-seller relationships: The importer’s perspective.” Journal of International Business Studies 33(4): 757-783. 146. Skyrme, D. J., & Amidon, D. M. (1997), “Creating the Knowledge-Based Business”, London:Business Intelligence Limited. 147. Smallwood, D.E. and Conlisk, J. (1979), “Product quality in markets where consumers are imperfectly informed.” Quart. J. Econ. 93, 1-23. 148. Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S. (2004), “The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy”, Int. J. Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol.1, Nos.1/2 , p. 4-32. 149. Solberg, C. A., & Nes, E. B. (2002). “Exporter trust, commitment and marketing control in integrated and independent export channels.” International Business Review, 11(4), 385-405. 150. Sourafel Girma, (2005), 'Technology Transfer from Acquisition FDI and the Absorptive Capacity of Domestic Firms: An Empirical Investigation,' Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 175-187. 151. Tanaka, J.（1987）, “How Big is Enough? Sample Size and Goodness-of-Fit in Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables,” Child Development, Vol.58, pp.134-146. 152. Tasi, Wenpin.（2001）,” Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of. network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance.”, Academy of Management Journal. 44(5):996-1004. 153. The case-law of the WTO, 1998-1.Title main entry. Ed. by Brigitte Stern and Helene Ruiz Fabri. Martinus-Nijhoff, [c]2005 154. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development（UNCATED）, （1984）Trade and Development Report, Geneva. 155. Thompson S.H. Teo & Yuanyou Yu, （2005）, 'Online buying behavior: a transaction cost economics perspective', The International Journal of Management Science, 33, 2005, pp451-465. 156. Udis, Bernard and Maskus, Keith（1991）, Offsets as Industrial policy: Lessons from Aerospace, Defense Economics, vol. 2, pp. 151-164. 157. US Department of Commerce, 2004. Offsets in Defense Trade and the US Subcontractor base, Study prepared by Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, August 2004. 158. U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security, 2005，Offsets in Defense Trade, Tenth Study, December, 2005. 159. Verzariu, Pompiliu (2000), The Evolution of International Barter, Countertrade, and Offset Practices: A Survey of the 1970s Through the 1990s. U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Office of Finance and Countertrade, Washington, DC 160. Vijay Wadhwa and A Ravi Ravindran (2007), “Vendor selection in outsourcing”, Computers & Operations Research. New York. Vol. 34, Iss. 12; p. 3725 161. Walter, A. and Ritter, T. (2003), 'The influence of adaptations, trust, and commitment on value-creating functions of customer relationships', Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18, 4/5: 353-65. 162. Wang, Y., Lo, H.P., Yang, Y.H. (2004), “The constituent of core competencies and firm performance : evidence from high-technology firms in china.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.Vol. 21, pp. 249-280. 163. Wanner, Barbara（1997）,” American, Japanese Defense Industries Explore Expanded Cooperation”, JEI Report, No. 23. 164. Weis, L. McCarthy, C. and Dimitriadis, G. (Eds.) (2006). “Ideology, Curriculum, and the New Sociology of Education.” New York and London: Routledge. 165. Williamson, O.E.（1975）, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York : Free Press. 166. Williamson, O. (1981), ``The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach', American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 548-77. 167. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press. World Development Indicator (2002). Washington, D.C.: World Bank. 168. Williamson, O. E. (1993). “The economic analysis of institutions and organizations - In general and with respect to country studies (OECD).” Working Paper 133, OECD/GD(93)158). Paris: OECD. 169. Williamson, O. E. (1993b) “Opportunism and its Critics,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 14 (January 1993b): pp. 97-107. 170. Wong, A. (1999).” Partnering Through Cooperative Goals in Supply Chain Relationships [ J] “, Total Quality Management , 10(1),pp. 786 - 793. 171. Woodcodk, C. Patrick, Paul W. Beamish, and Shige Makino (1994), 'Ownership-based Entry Mode Strategies and International Performance,' Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), pp.253-273. 172. Wortzel, R.（1979）,” New Life Style Determinants of Women's Food and Shopping Behavior”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.43, pp. 28-29. 173. Yan, A. & Luo, Y. （2001）, 'International joint ventures: Theory and practice.' New York: M.E. Sharpe. 174. Yong Suhk Pak & Young-Ryeol Park（2004） “Global Ownership Strategy of Japanese Multinational Enterprises: A Test of Internalization Theory”, mir-2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Volume 44, Issue 1. 175. Yoon, E., H.J. Guffey and V. Kijewski, (1993),” The Effects of Information and Company Reputations on intentions to Buy a Business Service.” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 27, pp. 216-228. 176. Zahra, SA & George, G., （2002）, “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension”, Academy of Management Review, vol.27, no. 2, pp.185-203. 177. Zajac, E., and M. Bazerman,（1991）, “Blind Spots in Industry and Competitor Analysis: Implications of Interfirm (Mis)Perceptions for Strategic Decisions”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 37-56. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43424 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 運用政府國外採購之機會，要求得標外商適當回饋國內機構，對此貿易補償行為，我國稱之為工業合作計畫（Industrial Cooperation Program, ICP）。
此貿易行為中之關鍵三方：銷售國企業、採購國政府與其企業間，所扮演之角色各有不同。本研究搜集近20年參與工業合作計畫之國內機構資料，以回收175份之問卷，運用SPSS 12與LISREL 8.71等統計分析軟體，發現： 一、基於對政府政策之瞭解，國內機構即使無法完全掌握外商能力，仍積極參與政府計畫。同時，亦可因此獲得新知，以及與國外企業緊密連結之機會。 二、國內機構面對不確定性最高的國際合作，在政府協助下，幾乎無需給付事前評估成本。此舉，與有交易就有成本的簡約概念，應屬較為新穎的思維。 三、在我國首度實證，三邊統制（trilateral governance）之監督者如為政府單位，則政府為確保政策施行成效，所進行之各項交易防衛措施，幾乎可令全部的國內機構滿意合作結果。 四、在政府積極涉入與強勢輔導下，國內外企業間，若仍發生糾紛，則需政府調處之必要性越高，但調處成效卻非常有限。 五、在我國首度實證，補償互惠可克服雙方交易時，所面臨之資訊不對稱、道德危機與決策時點不一致等困擾。並使參與工業合作計畫之機構，可有效的將合作成果內化，甚至轉成新知與進行管理流程的精進。 因此，政府推動之工業合作計畫，的確可大幅降低國內外企業間之交易成本，但若想促成國內外企業間之夥伴關係，則仍有待國內企業更加主動積極的提高與跨國企業之溝通品質，在建立彼此之互信基礎下，才有機會提升本身之競爭力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | A trading offset transaction in which a foreign contractor is obliged to feed back the domestic companies in return for its successful business bidding under an overseas government procurement project is known as Industrial Cooperation Program (ICP) in Taiwan.
This activity involves three parties, namely, the foreign contractor, the government and the domestic companies. A questionnaire survey was conducted in this study to collect the data of domestic organizations that have been engaged in the ICP over the last 20 years. In total, 175 copies of the questionnaire were returned. According to a statistical analysis of the collected data with the software programs of SPSS 12 and LISREL 8.71, this study has found: 1. Even if a domestic organization fails to have a full comprehension of the capability of a prospective foreign contractor, it can still engage in the ICP with a deep understanding of the government policy. Meanwhile, the ICP helps domestic organizations increase their knowledge and opportunities to be closely connected with the enterprises abroad. 2. In the most complicated model of cooperation between local and overseas enterprises, a domestic organization is expected to pay no or little pre-assessment cost with the support of the government. In contrast to a general theory of any transaction entailing costs, this process requires a new way of thinking. 3. It has been empirically shown first in Taiwan that enterprises can enjoy a satisfactory business partnership if the government which takes every transaction defensive measure to ensure the performance of its policy is acting as a supervisor of the trilateral governance business cooperation. 4. It is essential for the government to intervene to resolve disputes between a domestic organization and a foreign contractor under the framework of ICP. However, such government intervention generally achieves limited cooperative effectiveness. 5. It has been empirically confirmed first in Taiwan that offsets can overcome concerns arising from information asymmetry, ethical risks and inconsistent timing of decisions in a transaction. Most organizations that have been engaged in the ICP can have their cooperative results effectively internalized and transformed into their system of operations and management. Accordingly, while domestic enterprises involved in the ICP considerably reduce their costs for business transactions with foreign contractors, they are expected to improve their communicative proficiency in order to consolidate such partnerships. Finally, it is only on the basis of mutual trust can a domestic organization raise its own competitiveness. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:55:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-D89724003-1.pdf: 900165 bytes, checksum: 7afa18272fd0f9e648c4790d84f6ec06 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
中文摘要 ......................................................................................................................... i 英文摘要 ........................................................................................................................ ii 目 錄 ............................................................................................................................. iv 表目錄 ........................................................................................................................... vi 圖目錄 .......................................................................................................................... vii 第一章 緒論 .............................................................................................. 1 第一節 研究背景與動機....................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的與問題....................................................................................... 5 第三節 論文結構與研究流程............................................................................. 10 第四節 研究範圍................................................................................................. 12 第二章 文獻探討 .................................................................................... 13 第一節 企業聲譽................................................................................................. 13 第二節 企業能力................................................................................................. 15 第三節 政府政策................................................................................................. 16 第四節 交易成本................................................................................................. 19 第五節 政府調處................................................................................................. 24 第六節 吸收效能................................................................................................. 27 第七節 知識管理效能......................................................................................... 28 第八節 關係品質................................................................................................. 31 第九節 夥伴關係................................................................................................. 33 第三章 工業合作 .................................................................................... 35 第一節 工業合作的定義..................................................................................... 35 第二節 工業合作的起源與演進......................................................................... 36 第三節 全球補償互惠的發展............................................................................. 38 第四節 我國工業合作執行方式......................................................................... 40 第五節 工業合作執行成本與分析..................................................................... 43 第四章 研究架構與假說 ........................................................................ 53 第一節 研究架構................................................................................................. 53 第二節 研究假設之建立..................................................................................... 55 第三節 研究變項定義與問卷設計..................................................................... 67 第四節 研究樣本................................................................................................. 79 第五節 資料分析方法與內涵............................................................................. 81 第五章 實證研究結果 .......................................................................... 88 第一節 基本資料分析......................................................................................... 88 第二節 模型的信度與效度................................................................................. 93 第三節 原始模型解析....................................................................................... 104 第四節 修正模型解析....................................................................................... 112 第六章 結論與建議 ............................................................................ 117 第一節 研究結論............................................................................................... 117 第二節 理論貢獻............................................................................................... 120 第三節 研究限制............................................................................................... 125 第四節 未來研究建議....................................................................................... 126 參考文獻 ................................................................................................ 130 附錄 ........................................................................................................ 142 附錄一 問卷.......................................................................................................... 142 附錄二 歷年來與三邊統制相關之博碩士論文一覽表...................................... 146 附錄三 歷年來與工業合作相關之博碩士論文一覽表...................................... 148 附錄四 工業合作計畫作業要點.......................................................................... 150 表目錄 表2-1 交易資產專屬性程度與交易頻次對交易方式之影響............................. 26 表3-1 OFFSET占美國國防武器交易合約之比例（1998~2002）........................ 37 表3-2 各產業進行工業合作之主要成果清單..................................................... 49 表4-1 研究假說彙整表......................................................................................... 65 表4-2 研究變數及其操作性定義......................................................................... 75 表5-1 樣本機構之產業分布統計表..................................................................... 89 表5-2 樣本機構之資產規模統計表..................................................................... 90 表5-3 樣本機構之成立期間統計表..................................................................... 91 表5-4 樣本機構之員工人數統計表..................................................................... 91 表5-5 樣本機構之國際合作經驗統計表............................................................. 92 表5-6 樣本機構之合作對象統計表..................................................................... 93 表5-7 信度指標檢視表......................................................................................... 94 表5-8 外衍潛在變項-企業能力之相關分析........................................................ 95 表5-9 外衍潛在變項-外商聲譽之相關分析........................................................ 96 表5-10 外衍潛在變項-政策支持之相關分析...................................................... 97 表5-11 內衍潛在變項-事前評估成本之相關分析.............................................. 97 表5-12 內衍潛在變項-交易防衛之相關分析...................................................... 98 表5-13 內衍潛在變項-政府調處之相關分析...................................................... 99 表5-14 內衍潛在變項-吸收效能之相關分析.................................................... 100 表5-15 內衍潛在變項-知識管理效能之相關分析............................................ 100 表5-16 內衍潛在變項-關係品質之相關分析.................................................... 101 表5-17 內衍潛在變項-夥伴關係之相關分析.................................................... 101 表5-18 新舊模型間相關變數之信度比較表..................................................... 114 表5-19 新舊模型間基本配適度指標比較表..................................................... 115 表5-20 新舊模型間整體模型配適度指標比較表............................................. 115 表5-21 原始模型與修正模型在相關假設間之對照表..................................... 116 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究問題之基本結構................................................................................... 6 圖1-2 研究流程圖................................................................................................. 11 圖2-1 文獻探討之基本結構................................................................................. 13 圖3-1 工業合作推動組織及執掌......................................................................... 41 圖3-2 工業合作推動項目、乘數及目標............................................................... 43 圖3-3 工業合作額度累積圖................................................................................. 45 圖4-1 研究架構..................................................................................................... 54 圖5-1 研究模型各變數間之關係與顯著性....................................................... 105 圖5-2 交易防衛前各變數間之關係與顯著性................................................... 105 圖5-3 吸收效能前各變數間之關係與顯著性................................................... 108 圖5-4 夥伴關係前各變數間之關係與顯著性................................................... 111 圖5-5 研究模型之示意圖................................................................................... 112 圖5-6 修正模型................................................................................................... 114 圖5-7 修正模型各潛在變項之關係負荷圖....................................................... 116 圖6-1 建議未來研究之模型1............................................................................. 128 圖6-2 建議未來研究之模型2............................................................................. 128 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 夥伴關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 相對貿易 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 補償互惠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 工業合作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 交易成本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 三邊統制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知識管理效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Offset | en |
| dc.subject | Trilateral Governance | en |
| dc.subject | Transaction Cost | en |
| dc.subject | Industrial Cooperation | en |
| dc.subject | Countertrade | en |
| dc.subject | Partnership | en |
| dc.subject | Knowledge Management Effectiveness | en |
| dc.title | 三邊統制對國際工業合作計畫的影響分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Trilateral Governance in International Industrial Cooperation Programs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳青松,楊台寧,趙義隆,歐嘉瑞 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 相對貿易,補償互惠,工業合作,交易成本,三邊統制,知識管理效能,夥伴關係, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Countertrade,Offset,Industrial Cooperation,Transaction Cost,Trilateral Governance,Knowledge Management Effectiveness,Partnership, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 152 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-06-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 879.07 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。