Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 社會工作學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43133
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林萬億
dc.contributor.authorYi-Ju Linen
dc.contributor.author林奕如zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T01:38:37Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-20
dc.date.copyright2009-07-20
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-07-15
dc.identifier.citation王馨梓(民82)。去機構化運動與精神病患社區復健──分析台灣地區精神病患社區復建工作。台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文,台北市。
伊甸活泉之家(民98)。財團法人伊甸社會服利基金會附設台北市私立活泉之家五週年紀念特刊。台北市。
宋麗玉(民87)。精神病患社區照顧之省思──社區化或機構化,選擇或困局?中華心理衛生學刊,11(4),73-103。
宋麗玉(民89)。建構台灣慢性精神病患之社區支持體系──醫療模式與社會心理模式之整合。社區發展季刊,92,126-140。
宋麗玉(民92)。台灣精神障礙者之社區照護(復健)發展。台灣精神障礙者社區照護發展理想與實務研討會彙編。國家衛生研究院論壇。台北:國家衛生研究院。13-21。
宋麗玉 (民94)。精神障礙者之復健與復元─一個積極正向的觀點。中華心理衛生學刊 ,18(4), 01-29。
林萬億(民95)。當代社會工作(2版)。台北市:五南。
林萬億(民96)。團體工作─理論與技術。台北市:五南。
洪千惠(民95)。慢性精神病患從醫院回歸社區──為何回家是一條漫長的路。中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
胡幼慧(民95)。轉型中的質性研究。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市:巨流。
郭峰志(民90)主譯;Breakey, W.(1996)編。現代社區精神醫療:整合式心理衛生服務體系。臺北市:心理出版社。
許臨高、莫藜藜(民94)譯;Toseland R.W. & Rivas R.F.著。團體工作實務。台北市:雙葉書廊。
高麗芷、周美華(民93)。台北市社區精神復健中心。北市醫學雜誌,1(4),503-511。
姚敏貞(民94)。都會社區精神復健機構「康復之家」住民生活品質之影響因素探討。陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文,台北市。
單美惠(民92)。精神衛生法之國際比較──以台灣、日本及英國為例。台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文,台北市。
楊聰財、李明濱、吳英璋、魯中興、陳韺與吳文正(民93)。社區心理衛生中心的歷史沿革。北市醫學雜誌,1(4),393-411。
楊聰財、李明濱、吳英璋、魯中興、陳韺與吳文正(民94)。台灣地區社區心理衛生中心之運作型態。北市醫學雜誌,2(4),348-359。
滕西華(民93)。家庭照顧者的後援在哪裡?-談精神醫療社會資源之現況、困難與建議。台灣社區精神照護研討會-家庭照護與就業服務。臺北:國家衛生研究院。27。
蔡依芬(民96)。社區精神復健之現象探究──以『因應SARS為社區精神病患辦理社區復健方案』為場域。東吳大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文,台北市。
鄭麗珍(民94)。生態系統觀點。載於宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍(著),社會工作理論──處遇模式與案例分析(249-281頁)。台北市:洪葉。
Accordino, M. P., Porter D. F., & Morse T. (2001). Deinstitutionalization of Persons with Severe Mental Illness: Context and Consequence. Journal of Rehabilitation 67(2): 17-21.
Anderson, S. B. (1998).We Are Not Alone: Fountain House and the Development of Clubhouse Culture. New York: Fountain House Inc
Anthony, W.A., Rogers, E.S., & Farkas, M. (2003). Research on Evidence-based Practices: Future Directions in an Era of Recovery. Community Mental Health Journal 39(2): 101-114.
Anthony, W. A. (1993a). The Decade of Recovery. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 16(4): 1.
Anthony, W. A. (1993b). Recovery from Mental Illness: The Guiding Vision of the Mental Health Service System in the 1990's. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 16(4): 11-23.
Aquila, R., Santos, G., Malamud, T. J., & Mccrory, D. (1999). The Rehabilitation Alliance in Practice: The Clubhouse Connection.'Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 23(1): 19-23.
Babbie, E. (2004).The Practice of Social Research. (10th ed.) Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth.
Beard, J., Propst, R., & Malamud, T. (1982), The Fountain House Model of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5 (1): 47-53.
Carpenter, J. (2002). Mental Health Recovery Paradigm: Implications for Social Work. Health & Social Work, 27(2): 86-94.
Deegan, P. (1997). Recovery and Empowerment for People with Psychiatric Disabilities. Social Work in Health Care 25(3): 11-24.
Farkas, M. (2007). The Vision of Recovery Today: What it is and What it Means for Services. World Psychiatry 6(2): 4-10.
Fisher, D. (2003). People are More Important than Pills in Recovery from Mental Disorder. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 43(2): 65-68.
Gagne, C., White, W., & Anthony, W. A.(2007). Recovery: A Common Vision for the Fields of Mental Health and Addictions. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 31(1): 32-37.
Hardiman, E. R. & Segal, S. P. (2003). Community Membership and Social Networks in Mental Health Self-Help Agencies. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 27(1): 25-33.
Healy, R. (2005). Social Work Theories In Context: Creating Frameworks for Practice. New York : Palgrave Macmillan
Herman, S. E., Onaga, E., Pernice-Duca, F., Oh, S., & Ferguson, C. (2005). Sense of Community in Clubhouse Programs: Member and Staff Concepts. American Journal of Community Psychology 36(3-4): 343-356.
Huxley, P. & Thornicroft, G. (2003). Social Inclusion, Social Quality and Mental Illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 182: 289-290.
Jackson, R. L. (2001). The Clubhouse Model : Empowering Applications of Theory to Generalist Practice. Belmont, CA : Brooks/Cole.
Jackson, R.L., Purnell, D., Anderson, S. B., & Sheafor, B. W. (1996). The Clubhouse Model of Community Support for Adults with Mental Illness: An Emerging Opportunity for Social Work Education. Journal of Social Work Education, 32 (2): 172-180.
Jacobson, N., & Greenley, D. (2001). What is Recovery? A Conceptual Model and Explication. Psychiatric Services 52(4): 582-585.
Kimmel, A.J. (1996). Ethical Issues in the Conduct of Human Subject Research II: Field Research. In Ethical issues in behavioral research: A survey (pp. 118-157). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Linhorst, D. M. & Eckert. A. (2003). Conditions for Empowering People with Severe Mental Illness. The Social Service Review 77(2): 279-305.
Macias, C., Jackson, R., Schroedor, C., & Wang, Q. (1999). What is a Clubhouse? Report on the ICCD 1996 Survey of USA Clubhouses. Community Mental Health Journal 35(2): 181-190.
Mancini, M. A., Hardiman, E.R., & Lawson, H.A. (2005). Making Sense of it All: Consumer Providers' Theories about Factors Facilitating and Impeding Recovery from Psychiatric Disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 29(1): 48-55.
McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of Community. Journal of Community Psychology 24(4): 315-325.
Mechanic, D. and D. A. Rochefort (1990). Deinstitutionalization - An Appraisal of Reform. Annual Review of Sociology 16: 301-327.
Mowbray, C. T., Lewandowski, L., Holter, M., & Bybee, D. (2006). The Clubhouse as an Empowering Setting. Health & Social Work 31(3): 167-179.
Munetz, M. R. & Frese III, F. J. (2001). Getting Ready for Recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 25(1): 35-42.
Norman, C. (2006). The Fountain House Movement, an Alternative Rehabilitation Model for People with Mental Health Problems, Members' Descriptions of What Works. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences [Scand J Caring Sci] 20(2): 184-192.
O'Connor, F. W. & Delaney, K. R. (2007). The Recovery Movement: Defining Evidence-based Processes. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 21(3): 172-175.
Onken (2003, May). Mental Health Recovery: What Helps and What Hinders? Paper presented at 2003 Joint National Conferences on Mental Health Block Grant and Mental Health Statistics, Washington DC.
Onken, S. J., Craig, C. M., Ridgway, P., Ralph, R.O., & Cook, J. A. (2007). An Analysis of the Definitions and Elements of Recovery: A Review of the Literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 31(1): 9-22.
Pernice-Duca, F. M. (2008). The Structure and Quality of Social Network Support among Mental Health Consumers of Clubhouse Programs. Journal of Community Psychology 36(7): 929-946.
Parr, H. (2008). Mental Health and Social Space : towards Inclusionary Geographies? MA : Blackwell Pub.
Payne, M. (2005). Modern Social Work Theory. (3rd ed.) Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan Press
Pinto, R. (2006). Using Social Network Interventions to Improve Mentally Ill Clients' Well-being. Clinical Social Work Journal 34(1): 83-100.
Sayce, L. (2001). Social Inclusion and Mental Health. Psychiatric Bulletin 25: 121-123.
Spaniol, L., Wewiorski, N. J., Gagne, C., & Anthony, W. A. (2002). The Process of Recovery from Schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry 14(4): 327-336.
Stromwall, L. K. & Hurdle, D. (2003). Psychiatric Rehabilitation: An Empowerment-Based Approach to Mental Health Services. Health & Social Work 28(3): 206-213.
Turner-Crowson, J. & Wallcraft, J. (2002). The Recovery Vision for Mental Health Services and Research: A British Perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 25(3): 245-254.
Tutty, L.M., Rothery, M. A. & Grinnell, R. M. (1996). Qualitative Research for Social Workers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Valentine, G. (2001). At the Drawing Board: Developing a Research Design. In M. Limb & C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates (pp. 41-54). London: Arnold.
Wang, F. T. Y. & Lu, Y.-H. (2008). Clubhouse as a Site of Social Inclusion for Mentally Ill Persons: The Experience of Easy House in Taiwan.
網路資源
內政部(民96)。內政部統計通報。民98年1月11日,取自:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/
台北市康復之友協會(民97)。民97年10月11日,取自:http://www.tpmra.org.tw/
行政院衛生署(民96)。精神衛生法。民97年10月11日,取自:adm.ncyu.edu.tw/~stude/rule_c/sss-026.doc
行政院衛生署(民96)。精神醫療資源現況表。民98年1月11日,取自:http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/eBAS/醫療機構及醫事人員統計/精神醫療資源/精神資源現況總表.xls
行政院衛生署桃園療養院。為民服務白皮書。民98年1月11日,取自:http://www.typc.doh.gov.tw/pandect/pandect_1.asp
趙夢麒(民94)。心理衛生之三大領域──精神疾病之預防、治療與復健。民98年1月11日,取自:www.health.gov.tw/Portals/0/文宣出版品/手冊/20058291137562.pdf
WHO(2004)。CBR(以社區為基礎的康復)。民98年1月11日,取自:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241592389_chi.pdf
International Center for Clubhouse Development。Retrieved November 11, 2008,
from the World Wide Web: http://www.iccd.org/default.aspx
Fountain House。Retrieved November 11, 2008,
from the World Wide Web:http://www.fountainhouse.org/
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43133-
dc.description.abstract慢性精神病患社區化是台灣從民國60年代起的思維。在30多年的發展下,政府建構了精神醫療網,以及擬定推行相關的政策法令以發展社區精神復健,民間機構也有對應的努力。但近幾年在社區復健的發展中,出現了個別化和多元性不夠的反思。在這樣的反思和需求下,台灣在民國90年後,陸續成立了會所模式,讓精神障礙者有自主選擇的空間。這樣創新的模式在剛起步的情況下,究竟提供了什麼樣的機制和網絡,對當中的會員康復又有什麼樣的助益,是本研究所關心的問題。
本研究以質性研究以回應研究主題,選取台北My House當作研究對象,隨機抽取七位會員和三位工作人員作為訪談對象,輔以參與觀察蒐集資料。研究發現從台北My House的內部交流,談到與社區的交流,而再切回台北My House在會員的康復上所扮演的媒介。
研究結果發現在台北My House內部機制上,會所工作日受限於「維繫會所運作」的責任,而在「提高自我價值」、「促進人際互動」與「培養就業能力」上的發揮都有所限制,也就是「任務取向」與「過程取向」的差異和衝突。在台北My House外部網絡上,目前以發展就業網絡為主,而提供會員其他資源和資訊的連結,與社區採取「和平相處」的態度。台北My House在會員康復上,提供了康復導向的環境、自主選擇的起步,以及支持性網絡發展的空間,但如何幫助會員邁向自立,仍是需要長期努力的部份。
根據研究結果,在會所內部機制、會所外部網絡,以及精神醫療復健體制三方面做出建議,以及提出未來研究建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe community-based service for people with chronic mental disability is the thinking traced back to 1970’s. Over the next three decades, the psychiatric medical network was established. Related policy was set up to develop community psychiatric rehabilitations as well. Led by the government, the non-profit organizations also contribute a lot of effort. However, the reflection of the unsatisfied demand on individualization and variety emerged during the recent development. Clubhouse model was established in response to the reflection and demand after 2000’s to provide personal space to choose for people with mental disability. The research is dedicated to look into the mode and network of this new model and the benefits it provides to its members in terms of their recovery.
The research applied qualitative research method in response to the theme. Seven members and three staffs of My House, Taipei were randomly selected as the interviewees. Participant observation was also used to collect data. The research finding focused on the interaction within My House, the interaction between My House and community, and the role My House play on the recovery of its members.
First, the research indicated that in terms of its inner mode, the work-ordered day of My House is occupied with the responsibility of daily clubhouse operation. As a result, its major tasks such as enhancing self-value, promoting interpersonal interaction and cultivating work ability are limited. It’s referred to the conflict between task-oriented work and process-oriented work.
Second, in its outer network, My House has developed the employment network and provides connections with other resources and information to its members. My House holds a “peaceful interaction” attitude toward its community.
Finally, My House dedicated itself to the establishment of a recovery-oriented environment, self-choice, and the development of supportive network for the recovery of its members. However, it remains its major concern that how to help its members to achieve independency.
Based on the findings, the researcher will provide suggestions on the improvements of the inner mode of the clubhouse, the outer network of the clubhouse, and the psychiatric rehabilitation system. Furthermore, the researcher will make recommendation on future research.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:38:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R95330006-1.pdf: 870207 bytes, checksum: 8e6b9fd1f306f56598640a46d0f16d74 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭.........i
中文摘要.........ii
英文摘要.........iii
目錄.........v
表目錄.........ix
圖目錄.........ix
第一章 緒論.........1
第一節 研究緣起.........1
第二節 研究議題.........3
第三節 研究目的.........6
第二章 文獻回顧.........7
第一節 精神障礙者的康復.........7
一、精神障礙者康復概念的起源.........7
二、康復的意涵.........11
三、康復的階段和任務.........15
四、康復的助力和阻力.........16
第二節 以康復為信念的會所模式.........18
一、會所模式的起源.........18
二、會所模式相關理論.........20
三、會所模式的內涵......... 23
第三節 會所模式的交流.........28
一、會所模式內的交流.........28
二、會所模式與社區的交流.........32
第四節 從台灣的社區精神復健到會所模式.........34
一、社區精神復健的定義.........34
二、台灣社區精神復健的歷史.........35
三、從社區精神復健到會所模式的誕生.........40
小結.........43
第三章 研究方法.........44
第一節 研究方法選取.........44
一、依研究主題而言......... 44
二、依研究目的而言 .........44
第二節 研究設計.........45
一、研究對象.........45
二、資料蒐集.........47
三、資料分析.........49
四、研究值得信任度......... 49
第三節 研究倫理.........49
一、告知後同意.........50
二、匿名與保密.........50
三、沒有傷害.........50
第四節 研究者角色 .........50
第四章 研究發現與分析.........52
第一節 七位精神障礙者的生命故事.........52
壹、斯文踏實的永祥 .........52
貳、緩緩奮鬥的恩寶 .........53
參、樂於分享的嘉福 .........54
肆、不挫不撓的茗芳......... 56
伍、自我接納的映羽 .........57
陸、永不放棄的萱茵......... 59
柒、見多識廣的智宇 .........61
第二節 台北My House素描.........63
壹、機構介紹.........63
貳、工作日.........67
參、服務方案.........76
肆、服務特性.........83
第三節 台北My House內部交流.........92
壹、會員情誼.........92
貳、會所權力結構.........99
參、會員交易.........104
肆、團體文化.........107
第四節 台北My House與社區.........110
壹、從就業準備到就業服務.........111
貳、生活圈的擴大.........114
參、台北My House與精神醫療復健體系.........119
第五節 台北My House與康復.........125
壹、會員心中的康復圖像.........125
貳、台北My House作為康復的橋樑.........132
第六節 分析與討論 .........147
壹、台北My House社區復健功能的發揮程度.........147
貳、在夥伴關係輔助下,會員自主性的發揮度.........148
參、台北My House網絡的穩固和延伸程度.........149
肆、台北My House對精神障礙者康復的助力.........150
第五章 結論與建議 .........151
第一節 結論.........151
壹、台北My House內部機制.........152
貳、台北My House的外部網絡.........154
參、台北My House會員與康復.........155
第二節 建議.........156
壹、會所內部機制.........156
貳、會所外部網絡.........157
參、精神醫療復健體制.........157
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議.........158
壹、選取樣本的限制......... 158
貳、資料蒐集的限制......... 158
參、資料分析的限制......... 159
肆、未來研究建議.........159
參考文獻.........160
附錄一 會員訪談大綱.........167
附錄二 社工訪談大綱.........168
附錄三 就業服務員訪談大綱.........168
附錄四 會員訪談同意書.........169
附錄五 工作人員訪談同意書.........170

表目錄
表2-1 影響康復的因素.........17
表3-1 受訪會員基本資料.........46
表3-2 受訪工作人員基本資料.........47
圖目錄
圖2-1 生態觀點的康復元素.........15
圖2-2 會所模式系統中的能量交換.........22
圖2-3 會所模式中會所與會員的雙向交流.........28
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject台北My Housezh_TW
dc.subject精神障礙者zh_TW
dc.subject康復zh_TW
dc.subject會所模式zh_TW
dc.subject復原zh_TW
dc.subjectTaipeien
dc.subjectMy Houseen
dc.subjectRecoveryen
dc.subjectPeople with mental disabilityen
dc.subjectClubhouse Modelen
dc.title探索台北My House機制與網絡
--兼論會員的康復
zh_TW
dc.titleThe Exploration of the Mode and Network of My House, Taipei—including Members’Recoveryen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee宋麗玉,吳慧菁
dc.subject.keyword精神障礙者,台北My House,會所模式,康復,復原,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordPeople with mental disability,My House,Taipei,Clubhouse Model,Recovery,en
dc.relation.page170
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-07-16
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept社會工作學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:社會工作學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
849.81 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved