請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42745完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉素玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-I Liao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 廖心怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:21:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Althoff, R. R., & Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 997-1010.
Ariely, D., & Norton, M. I. (2008). How actions create - not just reveal - preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 13-16. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 594-606. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496. Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformations of sensory messages In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory Communication (pp. 217-234): MIT Press. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470. Beauchampa, M. S., Petitb, L., Ellmorea, T. M., Ingeholma, J., & Haxbya, J. V. (2001). A parametric fMRI study of overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention. NeuroImage, 14, 310-321. Bevins, R. A., & Bardo, M. T. (1999). Conditioned increase in place preference by access to novel objects: Antagonism by MK-801. Behavioural Brain Research, 99, 53-60. Bichot, N. P., Cave, K. R., & Pashler, H. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 403-423. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2005). Oculomotor consequences of abrupt object onsets and offsets: Onsets dominate oculomotor capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 910-928. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. Bornstein, R. F. (1992). Subliminal mere exposure effects. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness (pp. 191-210): The Guilford Press. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545-552. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128. Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social behavior. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1070-1079. Brehm, J. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford University Press. Cave, K. R. (1999). The feature gate model of visual selection. Psychological Research, 62, 182-194. Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (1999). ANOVA and trend analysis statistical program for cognitive experiment. Research in Applied Psychology, 1, 229-246. Corbetta, M., Kincade, M. J., Lewis, C., Snyder, A. Z., & Sapir, A. (2005). Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1603-1610. Craver-Lemley, C., & Bornstein, R. F. (2006). Self-generated visual imagery alters the mere exposure effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1056-1060 Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, 1413-1420. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P,, Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211. Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., & Hollingworth, A. (2009). Novelty is not always the best policy: Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task. Psychological Science, 20, 333-339. Downing, C., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 171-187): NJ: Erlbaum: Hillsdale. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177. Egly, R., & Homa, D. (1991). Reallocation of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 142-159. Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581-604. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of visual masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160. Eriksen, C. W., & St James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597. Fantz, R. L. (1961). The origin of form perception. Scientific American, 204, 66-72. Fantz, R. L. (1963). Pattern vision in newborn infant. Science, 140, 296-297 Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146, 668-670. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-211. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 271-295): Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124. Franconeri, S. L., Hollingworth, A., & Simons, D. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention? Psychological Science, 16, 275-281. Franconeri, S. L., Simons, D. J., & Junge, J. A. (2004). Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 876-881. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490-495. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Abrupt onsets and gaze direction cues trigger independent reflexive attentional effects. Cognition, 87, 1-10. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a 'Greeble' expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682. Gellatly, A., Cole, G., & Blurton, A. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1609-1624. Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 699-706. Gibson, B. S., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17, 622-627. Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2009). Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: A further test of the gaze cascade model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 445-450. Godijn, R., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Oculomotor capture by surprising onsets. Visual Cognition, 16, 279-289. Gottfried, J. A., O'Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Encoding predictive reward value in human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Science, 301, 1104-1107. Haimson, C., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 496-503. Hamker, F. H. (2004). A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision Research, 44, 501-521. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233. Helmholtz, H. von. (1867/1925). Treatise on physiological optics (translated from the 3rd German edition): New York: Dover. Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219-1240. Ho, M. C., & Yeh, S. L. (in press). Effects of instantaneous object input and past experience on object-based attention. Acta Psychologica. Hoffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 283-290. Hollingworth, A. (2009). Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition, 17, 273-291. Houston-Price, C., & Nakai, S. (2004). Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures. Infant and Child Development, 13, 341-348. Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1068-1074. Hunt, A. R., Muhlenen, A. von, & Kingstone, A. (2007). The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 271-284. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-203. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. Jingling, L., & Yeh, S. L. (2007). New objects do not capture attention without a top-down setting: Evidence from an inattentional blindness task. Visual Cognition, 15, 661-684. Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikstrom, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310, 116-119. Johnson, J. D., Hutchison, K. A., & Trammell, N. W. (2001). Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 841-847. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Laong & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 187-203). NJ: Erlbaum: Hillsdale. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354. Kim, H., Adolphs, R., O'Doherty, J. P., & Shimojo, S. (2007). Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decision. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 104, 18253 - 18258. Klebaur, J. E., & Bardo, M. T. (1999). The effects of anxiolytic drugs on novelty-induced place preference. Behavioural Brain Research, 101, 51-57. Klein, R. (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention & Performance (Vol. 8, pp. 259-276): Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Klein, R. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147. Klein, R., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352. Klein, R., & Pontefract, A. (1994). Does oculomotor capture readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Revisited! In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention & Performance (Vol. 15, pp. 333-350): Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284. LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371-379. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124. Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. E. (2003). Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1003-1020. Lamy, D., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 1019-1031. Laughlin, W. S. (1968). Hunting: An integrating biobehavior system and its evolutionary importance. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the Hunter: Chicago: Aldine Publishing. Liao, H. I., & Yeh, S. L. (2007). Involuntary orienting caused by salient stimuli outside focal attention: Comparison of two paradigms. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 49, 145-158. Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. S. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180. Merikle, P. M., Smiled, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition, 79, 115-134. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15, 779-788. Mulckhuyse, M., van Zoest, W., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 225-235. Muller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330. Murray, E. A. (2007). The amygdala, reward and emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 489-497. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science, 257, 1357-1363. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265. Neo, G., & Chua, F. K. (2006). Capturing focused attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1286-1296. Nesse, R. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature, 1, 261-289. Nummenmaa, L., Hyona, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2006). Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. Emotion, 6, 257-268. Olds, E. S., & Fockler, K. A. (2004). Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search? Perception, 33, 195-216. Olst, E. H., van. (1971). The orienting reflex: Walter De Gruyter Inc. Park, J., Kim, H., & Shimojo, S. (2008). Linking memory to preference: An fMRI study of familiarity and novelty principles. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556): Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627-1631. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 109, 160-174. Rauschenberger, R. (2003a). Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 814-842. Rauschenberger, R. (2003b). When something old becomes something new: Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 600-615. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. Remington, R. W. (1980). Attention and saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 726-744. Remington, R. W., & Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 393-399. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-566. Richmond, J., Colombo, M., & Hayne, H. (2007). Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 823-831. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40. Robinson, E. S. (1993). The psychology of public education. American Journal of Public Health, 23, 123-128. Scharine, A. A., & McBeath, M. K. (2002). Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44, 248-256. Sechenov, I. (1965). Reflexes of the brain: The MIT Press. Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1994). Orienting of attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 507-522. Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Spatial attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 105, 261-275. Shimojo, E., Park, J., Kashino, M., & Shimojo, S. (2008). Familiarity for faces and novelty for natural scenes in preference: Does similarity matter? Paper presented at the Vision Science Society, 8th Annual Meeting. Shimojo, E., Park, J., & Shimojo, S. (under review). Familiarity vs. novelty principles for preference segregated among object categories. Unpublished manuscript. Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1317-1322. Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., & McLean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 522-526. Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2006). Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vision Research, 46, 3331-3335. Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2007). Interrupting the cascade: Orienting contributes to decision making even in the absence of visual stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 591-595. Stoerig, P., & Cowey, A. (1997). Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain, 120, 535-559. Teller, D. Y. (1979). The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: A psychophysical technique for use with human infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 135-158. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806. Theeuwes, J. (1995). Abrupt luminance change pops out; Abrupt color change does not. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 637-644. Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65-70. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention & Performance (Vol. 18, pp. 105-125): Cambridge: MIT Press. Theeuwes, J., & Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1342-1353. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1595-1608. Todd, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 198-210. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Gluckman, A. (1997). Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Development, 68, 1067-1080. Toussainta, Y., & Fagard, J. (2008). A counterclockwise bias in running. Neuroscience Letters, 442, 59-62. Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523-530. Turatto, M., & Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639-1643. Turatto, M., & Galfano, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 286-297. Van der Stigchel, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2005). Relation between saccade trajectories and spatial distractor locations. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 579-582. Van der Stigchel, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Our eyes deviate away from a location where a distrctor is expected to appear. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 338-349. Van der Stigchel, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 719-731. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160. Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-653. Weinberg, P., & Gottwald, W. (1982). Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions. Journal of Business Research, 10, 43-57. Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., et al. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385, 99-104. Willems, S., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency-preference links. Consciousness and cognition, 15, 323-341. Winstanley, C. A., Theobald, D. E. H., Cardinal, R. N., & Robbins, T. W. (2004). Contrasting roles of basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in impulsive choice. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 4718-4722. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433. Workman, L., & Reader, W. (2004). Evolutionary Psychology: An Introduction: Cambridge University Press. Wright, R. D., & Ward, L. M. (2008). Orienting of attention: Oxford University Press. Wu, S. C., & Remington, R. W. (2003). Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1050-1067. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676-681. Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134. Yeh, S. L., & Liao, H. I. (in preparation). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is not constrained by display-wide settings. Unpublished manuscript. Yeh, S. L., & Liao, H. I. (2008). On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 129, 157-165. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1-27. Zajonc, R. B., Shaver, P., Tavris, C., & van Kreveld, D. (1972). Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 21, 270-280. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42745 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 注意力指向包含認知與情緒的面向，分別藉由「選擇」和「喜好」所展現。第一系列的研究顯示，注意力指向的選擇機制同時受到刺激特性與目標設定的影響，當探討刺激能否攫取注意力時，必需區分「刺激導引的成分」以及「受目標設定影響」兩者所造成的效果。某些與作業無關的刺激特性，例如顯著性和動態性，確實能夠攫取注意力，但是其攫取效果會受到目標設定的調節；當與目標設定不一致時，其攫取效果會受到抑制而無法展現。本系列研究提出「交互作用模型」顯示：在刺激剛出現時，吾人的注意力主要受到刺激特性的影響而被導引，爾後則由個體目標設定來主導，進而調節由刺激引發的指向選擇。第二系列的研究探討兩種不同喜好（偏好熟悉人臉或新奇風景圖片）的內在機制，以及注意力指向在其中所扮演的角色。雖然兩種不同喜好的內在機制不同，但是注意力指向均扮演重要角色；指向與喜好的選擇相互增強，顯示指向選擇的認知功能與情緒的喜好判斷密不可分。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Orienting has both cognitive and emotional aspects which can be revealed by selection and preference, respectively. In the first part of this study, we investigate of how the selection occurs and propose an interactive model in which both stimulus-driven properties and top-down controls interact with each other to determinate the final selection. Certain kinds of stimulus properties such as salience or transient changes can elicit stimulus-driven activation to capture attention. However, the activation can be modulated by top-down controls. The interactive model differentiates the two components of orienting, involuntary and voluntary, and further helps to solve the discrepancy in the literature of attentional capture. In the second part of this study, we investigate two principles of memory in preference, preference for familiar faces and novel natural scenes, and how orienting plays a role in-between. Although different mechanisms of the two kinds of preferences are suggested by series of studies, orienting indeed contributes to preference. A positive feedback loop between selection and preference is suggested which implies a close linkage between cognition and emotion by orienting. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:21:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-F91227005-1.pdf: 1673522 bytes, checksum: 7b444d88843dae370585e00511c361cc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1. Introduction 1
What is orienting? 1 Overt vs. covert orienting 2 Voluntary vs. involuntary orienting 5 Cognitive vs. emotional aspect of orienting 6 Implicit processes 9 Goal and overview of this study 11 Chapter 2. Part I: Involuntary orienting as revealed by attentional capture 13 Stimulus-driven capture hypotheses 13 Contingent capture hypothesis 15 On the generality of the contingent capture hypothesis 16 The interactive model purposed in this study 17 Overview of Part I 18 Experiment 1: Asymmetry of onset and color in attentional capture 19 Experiment 1A: Onset cue, color target 20 Experiment 1B: Onset cue, color target 24 Experiment 1C: Color cue, onset target 27 General discussion of Experiment 1 29 Experiment 2: Top-down modulation on stimulus-driven orienting 30 Experiment 2A: Set size four 31 Experiment 2B: Set size eight 36 General discussion of Experiment 2 39 Experiment 3: A subliminal onset cue captures attention 41 Experiment 4: A subliminal color cue cannot capture attention 44 General discussion of Part I: Cognitive aspect of orienting 48 The interactive model: Stimulus-driven orienting 49 The interactive model: Top-down modulation 51 Chapter 3. Part II: Orienting and preference 55 Familiarity vs. novelty preference 55 The gaze cascade effect 56 The role of orienting in familiarity vs. novelty preference 57 Overview of Part II 58 Experiment 5: Determinant of familiarity vs. novelty preference 59 Experiment 5A：Depth of process 60 Experiment 5B：Nature of the task 63 General discussion of Experiment 5 65 Experiment 6: Orienting, and familiarity vs. novelty preference 66 Experiment 7: Effect of short exposure duration 70 General discussion of Part II: Emotional aspect of orienting 73 Orienting contributes to preference 74 Why do we prefer familiar faces and novel natural scenes? 75 Chapter 4: General discussion 79 Interaction between involuntary and voluntary orienting 79 Implicit processes 80 Orienting: From cognition to emotion 82 References 84 Figures 97 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 凝視瀑布效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 注意力攫取 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 突現 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 顏色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 眼動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | onset | en |
| dc.subject | gaze cascade effect | en |
| dc.subject | eye movement | en |
| dc.subject | color | en |
| dc.subject | attentional capture | en |
| dc.title | 注意力指向：從認知到情緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Orienting of attention: From cognition to emotion | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃榮村,梁庚辰,陳建中,蔡介立,汪曼穎 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 注意力攫取,突現,顏色,眼動,凝視瀑布效果, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | attentional capture,onset,color,eye movement,gaze cascade effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-24 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。