請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42648
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳文團 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Ping Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林雅萍 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:18:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-29 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alford, C. F. (2002). “Emmanuel Levinas and Iris Murdoch: Ethics as Exit?”, in Philosophy and Literature 26, pp.24-42.
Allison, H.E. (1983). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ──. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy, in Philosophy 33, pp. 1-19. Antonaccio, M. (1996). “Form and Contingency in Iris Murdoch’s Ethics”, in Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. eds. (1996), pp.110-137. ──. (2000). Picturing the Human. The Moral thought of Iris Murdoch. Oxford University Press. ──. (2001). “The Virtues of Metaphysics: A Review of Iris Murdoch’s Philosophical Writings”, in Journal of Religious Ethics 29.2, pp.309-335. Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. eds. (1996). Iris Murdoch and the Search for Human Goodness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Aristoteles (2006). Nikomachische Ethik. übersetzt u. herausgben von U. Wolf. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag. Aristotle (1985). Nicomachean Ethics. trans. with notes by T. Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. ──. (1998). The Nicomachean Ethics. trans. with an Introduction by D. Ross; revised by J. L. Ackrill and J. O. Urmson. Oxford University Press. Bagnoli, C. (2003). “Respect and Loving Attention”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.33, pp. 483-516. Baldwin, A. and Hutton, S. eds. (1994), Platonism and the English Imagination. Cambridge University Press. Baron, Marcia W. (1995). Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology, Cornell University Press. ──. (1997). “Love and Respect in the Doctrine of Virtue”, in Southern Journal of Philosophy 36, pp.29-44. Beck, L. W. (1960). A Commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason’. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Becker, L. and Becker, C. (2001). Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Beiner, R. and Nedelsky, J. eds. (2001). Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: themes from Kant and Arendt. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge. Blum, L. (1986). “Iris Murdoch and the Domain of the Moral”, in Philosophical Studies 50, pp.343-367. ──.(1988). “Gilligan and Kohlberg: Issues for Moral Theory”, in Ethics 98, pp.472-491. ──. (1991). “Moral Perception and Particularity”, in Ethics 101 (July), pp.701-725. ──. (1994). Moral Perception and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bormann, F.-J.und Schröer, C. hrg. (2004). Abwägende Vernunft: Praktische Rationalität in historischer, systematischer und religionsphilosophischer Perspektive. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Bove, C. (1993). Understanding Iris Murdoch. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Bowden, P. (1998). “Ethical Attention: Accumulating Understandings”, in European Journal of Philosophy, Volume 6, Number 1, April, pp. 59-77. Broadie, A. and Pybus, E.M. (1975). “Kant’s Concept of ‘Respect’”, in Kant-Studien 66, pp.58-64. Brown, S., Collinson, D. and Wilkinson, R. eds. (1998). One Hundred Twentieth-Century Philosophers. London; New York : Routledge. Burch, R. W. (1989). “The Commandability of Pathological Love”, in Soble, A. ed. (1989), pp.245-253. Burns, E. (1997). “Iris Murdoch and the Nature of Good”, in Religious Studies, Vol.33, pp.303-313. Byatt, A. S. (1965), Degrees of Freedom: The Novels of Iris Murdoch. London: Chatto and Windus. Conradi, P. J. (1986). Iris Murdoch: The Saint and the Artist. New York: St. Martin’s Press. ──. (1992), “Iris Murdoch and Dostoevsky”, in Todd, R. ed. (1988), pp. 37-54. ──. (1994), “Platonism in Iris Murdoch”, in Baldwin, A. and Hutton, S. eds. (1994), pp. 330-342. ──. (2001). Iris Murdoch: A Life, W. W. Norton & Company. Crisp, R. and Slote, M. (1997). Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Darwall, Stephen L. (1977). “Two Kinds of Respect”, Ethics 88, pp.36-49. ──. (1998). Philosophical Ethics, Westview Press. Denham, A. E. (2001). “Envisioning the Good: Iris Murdoch’s Moral Psychology”, in Modern Fiction Studies, Vol.47. No.3, pp.602-629. Diamond, C. (1985). “Missing the Adventure: Reply to Martha Nussbaum”, in The Journal of Philosophy, pp.530-531. ──. (1996). “ ‘We are Perpetually Moralists’: Iris Murdoch, Fact, and Value”, in Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. eds. (1996), pp.79-109. Dillon, J.M. and Long, A. A. eds. (1988). The Question of Eclecticism, Berkeley: University of California Press. Dillon, R. (1992). “Respect and Care: Toward Moral Integration”, in Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.22, No.1, March, pp.105-132. Dipple, E. (1982). Iris Murdoch: Work for the Spirit. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. Flanagan, O. and Rorty, A. O. ed. (1990). Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Fletcher J. (1988). “Iris Murdoch: The Foreign Translations”, in Todd, R. ed. (1998), pp.11-20. Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and Vices, Oxford: Blackwell. Galvin, R. (1991). “Does Kant’s Psychology of Morality Need Basic Revision?” , in Mind 100, pp.221-236. Gardiner, S. M. ed.(2005). Virtue Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gordon, David J. (1995). Iris Murdoch's Fables of Unselfing. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press. Griffin, G. (1993). The Influence of the Writings of Simone Weil on the Fiction of Iris Murdoch. The Edwin Mellen Press. Griffin, J. (1972). “The Fat Ego”, in Essays in Criticism 22, pp.74-83. Hamilton, C. (2005). “Simone Weil’s Human Personality”, in Harvard Theological Review 98, pp. 187-207. Hardy, R. (2000). Psychological and Religious Narratives in Iris Murdoch’s Fiction. The Edwin Mellen Press. Hauerwas, S. (1981) Vision and Virtue: Essays in Christian Ethical Reflection. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. ──. (1996). “Murdochian Muddles: Can We Get Through Them If God Does Not Exist?”, in Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. (1996), pp.190-208. Hauerwas, S. and MacIntyre, A. eds. (1983). Revisions: Changing Perspectives in Moral Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Herman, B. (1985). “The Practice of Moral Judgment”, in Journal of Philosophy 87, pp.414-436. ──. (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, 1993. Herrera, L. (2000). “Kant on the Moral Triebfeder”, in Kant-Studien 91, pp.395-410. Höffe, O. (1990). “Universalistische Ethik und Urteilskraft: ein aristotelischer Blick auf Kant”, in Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, Band 44:4. Holland, M. G. (1998). “Touching the Weights: Moral Perception and Attention”, in International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. XXXVIII, No.3, September, pp.299-312. Hooker, B. and Little, M. O. eds. (2000). Moral Particualism. Oxford University Press. Hume, D. (1982). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. By L.A. Selby-Bigge, revised by P.H. Nidditch, 3rd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hume, D. (1985). Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. E.F. Miller, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics. Hume, D. (2000). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. David F. Norton& M. J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ──. (2000). Ethics, Humans and Other Animals. London: Routledge. Irwin, T. H. (2000). “Ethics as an Inexact Science: Aristotle’s Ambitions for Moral Theory”, in Hooker & Margaret eds. (2000), pp.100-129. Jacobs, A. (1995). “Go(o)d in Iris Murdoch”, in First Things 50 (February 1995): 32-36. Jenni, K. (2003). “Vices of Inattention”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol.20, No.3. Johnson, R. (1997). “Love in Vain”, in Southern Journal of Philosophy 36, pp.45-50. Kahn, C. H. (1988). “Discovery of the Will: From Aristotle to Augustine”, in J.M. Dillon and A. A. Long, eds. (1988), pp.234-259. Kant, I. (1996). Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. M.J. Gregor with introduction by A.W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kanzian, C., Quitterer, J. & Runggaldier, E. eds. (2002), Personen. Ein Interdisziplinärer Dialog, Beiträge des 25. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums, Band X. Kekes, J. (1989). Moral Tradition and Individuality. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press. Korsgaard, C. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ──. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kyte, R. (1996). “Moral Reasoning as Perception: A Reading of Carol Gilligan”, in Hypatia, Vol. 11, no.3, summer. Larmore, C. (2001). “Moral Judgment”, in Beiner, R. and Nedelsky, J. eds. (2001), pp.47-64. Liddell and Scott (1972). An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lin, Y. P. (林雅萍) (2008). “Can Love be Commanded? Murdoch and Kant on Love and Respect”, presented at The Fourth International Iris Murdoch Conference: Intertextuality and Interdisciplinarity, Kingston University London, UK. ──. (2008). “Feelings and Virtues”, presented at XXII World Congress of Philosophy, Pre-congress Conference: Philosophy Emerging from Culture, Soongsil University Seoul, Korea. . Lita, A. (2004). “The Moral Regard for Others”, in The Philosopher, Vol. LXXXXII, No. 1. ──. (2003). “ ‘Seeing’ Human Goodness: Iris Murdoch on Moral Virtue”, in Minerva- An Internet Journal of Philosophy, Vol.7. Lloyd, G. (1982). “Iris Murdoch on the Ethical Significance of Truth”, in Philosophy and Literature, 6: 1/2, pp. 62-75. McCarty, R. (1994). “Motivation and Moral Choice in Kant’s Theory of Rational Agency”, in Kant-Studien 85, pp.15-31. McClendon, J. W. (1978). “ Three Strands of Christian Ethics”, in Journal of Religious Ethics 6.1, pp.54-80. McNaughton, D. (1992). Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics. Blackwell Publishers. MacIntyre, A. (1966). A Short History of Ethics. New York: Collier Books, Macmillan Publishing Co.. ──. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. ──. (1982). “Good for Nothing”, review of Iris Murdoch: Work for the Spirit, by Elizabeth Dipple, in London Review of Books, 4.10 (June), pp.3-16.. ──. (1983). “Moral Philosophy: What Next?” , in Hauerwas, S. and MacIntyre, A. eds. (1983), pp.1-15. ──. (1993). “Which World Do You See?” , Review of Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals, in New York Times Book Review, January 3. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London, New York: Penguin Books. Martin, M. W. (1996). Love’s Virtues. University Press of Kansas. Mathewes, Charles T. (2000). “Agency, Nature, Transcendence, and Moralism: A Review of Recent Work in Moral Psychology”, in Journal of Religious Ethics 28.2, pp.297-328. McDowell, J. (1979). “Virtue and Reason”, in The Monist 62, pp.331-350. Mendus, S. (1985). “The Practical and the Pathological”, in The Journal of Value Inquiry 19, pp.235-243. Mischel, T. ed. (1977). The self: Psychological and Philosophical Issues. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Mitchell, B. (1980). Morality: Religious & Secular. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprinted in 2000. Moran, R. (2008), “Iris Murdoch and Existentialism”, in Broackes, J.ed. Iris Murdoch, Philosopher, Oxford. Murdoch, Iris. (1954). Under the Net. Reprinted in 2002. Vintage Classics. ──. (1970). The Sovereignty of Good. Routledge & Kegan Paul, reprinted in 2003. ──. (1973). The Black Prince. Reprinted in 1999. Vintage Classics. ──. (1998). Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature, ed. by Peter Conradi, Penguin Books. ──. (1993). Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. New York: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press. Noggle, R. (1999). “Kantian Respect and Particular Persons”, in Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.29, No.3, pp.449-478. Nussbaum, M.C. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. ──. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press. ──. (1996). “Love and Vision: Iris Murdoch on Eros and the Individual”, in Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. eds. (1996), pp.29-53. Nye, A. (1994). Philosophia: the Thought of Luxemburg, Simone Weil, and Hannah Arendt. Routledge. O’Conner, Patricia J. (1996). To Love the Good: The Moral Philosophy of Iris Murdoch. American University Studies. Ser.5, Philosophy; Vol.136. Philips, D. (1991). Agencies of the Good in the Work of Iris Murdoch. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Reath, A. (1989). “Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility: Respect for the Moral Law and the Influence of Inclination”, in Kant-Studien 81, pp.284-302. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rowe, A. (2002). The Visual Arts and the Novels of Iris Murdoch. The Edwin Mellen Press. ── (ed.) (2006). Iris Murdoch: A Reassessment. Palgrave Macmillan. Ruokonen, F. (2002) “Good, Self, and Unselfing. Reflection on Iris Murdoch’s Moral Philosophy”, in Kanzian, C., Quitterer, J. & Runggaldier, E. eds. (2002), pp.211-213. ── (2008). Ethics and Aesthetics: Intersections in Iris Murdoch’s Philosophy. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki. Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and Nothingness: An Essay of Phenomenological Ontology, trans. H.E. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library. ──. (1977). Existentialism and Humanism, trans. Philip Mairet. Brooklyn: Haskel House Publishers. Schauber, N. (2001). “Murdoch’s Morality: Vision, Will, and Rules”, The Journal of Value Inquiry 35, pp.477-491. Schoeman, F. ed. (1987). Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions. Cambridge University Press. Schuster, J. (1997). Moralisches Können. Studien zur Tugendethik. Würzburg: Echter. Schweiker, W. (1995). Responsibility and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ──. (1996). “ The Sovereignty of God’s Goodness”, in Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. eds. (1996), pp.209-235. ──. (1999). “ Consciousness and the Good: Schleiermacher and Contemporary Theological Ethics”, in Theology Today, pp.180-196.. Sherman, N. (1989). The Fabric of Character. New York: Oxford University Press. ──. (1997). Making a Necessity of Virtue. Cambridge University Press. ──. (1998). “Concrete Kantian Respect”. Social Philosophy and Policy 51, pp.119-148. Simmons, K. (1989). “Kant on Moral Worth”, in History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol.6, No.1, pp.85-100. Slaymaker, W. (1992). “Myths, Mystery and the Mechanisms of Determinism: The Aesthetics of Freedom in Iris Murdoch’s Fiction”, in Tucker, L. ed. (1992), pp.19-32. Snow, N. E. (2005). “Iris Murdoch’s Notion of a Loving Gaze”, in The Journal of Value Inquiry, 39, pp.487-498. Soble, A. ed. (1989), Eros, Agape, and Philia: Readings in the Philosophy of Love, Paragon House. Solomon, R. (2005). “Erotic Love as a Moral Virtue”, in Gardiner, S. M. ed. (2005), pp. 81-100. Statman, D. ed. (1997). Virtue Ethics: a Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. Stocker, M. (1976). “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theory?”, in Journal of Philosophy 73, pp. 453-6. Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ──. (1977). “What is Human Agency”, in Mischel, T. ed. (1977), pp.103-138. ──. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ──. (1996). “Iris Murdoch and Moral Philosophy”, in Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. eds. (1996), pp.3-28. Todd, R. ed. (1988). Encounters with Iris Murdoch. Amsterdam: Free University Press. Trampota, A. (2003). Autonome Vernuft oder moralische Sehkraft? Das epistemische Fundament der Ethik bei Immanuel Kant und Iris Murdoch. Verlag W. Kohlhammer. ──. (2004). “Autonome Vernunft mit moralischer Sehkraft. Die Komplementartät von Allgemeinem und Besonderem bei Immanuel Kant”, in Bormann, F.-J.und Schröer, C. hrg. Tran Van Doan. (2005). “Response as Duty: A Reflection on Responsibility”, in Philosophy, Culture, and Traditions, Vol.3. pp.81-104. Tucker, L. ed. (1992). Critical Essays on Iris Murdoch. New York: GK Hall& Co. Velleman, J. D. (1999). “Love as a Moral Emotion”, in Ethics109, January, pp. 338-374. Vetö, M. (1994). The Religious Metaphysics of Simone Weil, trans. by Joan Dargan. State University of New York Press. Victor J. S. (1986). Kant, Respect, and Injustice: The Limits of Liberal Moral Theory. Völker, Wolfram. (1978). The Rhetoric of Love: Das Menschenbild und die Form des Romans bei Iris Murdoch. Armsterdam: Verlag B.R. Grüner. Weil, S. (1947). Le pesanteur et la grace. Paris: Librairie Plon. ──. (1951). Attente de dieu. Paris: La Colombe ──. (1955). Oppression et liberté, Paris: Gallimard; trans. A. Wills and J. Petrie, ──. (1958).Oppression and Liberty, London: Routledge. ──. (2000). Waiting for God. trans. E. Crauford. Perennial Classics. ──.( 2000 ). Simone Weil, An Anthology, Atlanta: Grove Press. ──. (2004). Gravity and Grace. trans. E. Crauford. London: Routledge. Weldhen, M. (1986). “Ethics Identity and Culture: Some Implications of the Moral Philosophy of Iris Murdoch”, in Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 15, No.2, pp.119-126. Widdows, H. (2005). The Moral Vision of Iris Murdoch. Ashgate Publishing Company. ──. (2007). “Conceptualising the Self in the Genetic Era”, in Health Care Analysis, Vol.15, No.1, pp.5-12. Williams, B. (1972). Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ──. (1981). Problems of the Self. Cambridge University Press. ──. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and London: Fontana. Wilson, J. (1989). “Can One Promise to Love Another?” in Philosophy 64.250, pp.557-563. Wisnewski, J. J., and Jacoby, H. (2007). “Failures of Sight: An Argument for Moral Perception”, in American Philosophical Quarterly, 44: 3, pp.229-244. Wolf, Susan. (1987). “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility”, in Schoeman ed. (1987). ──. (1990). Freedom Within Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wolf, Ursula. (1999). Die Philosophie und die Frage nach dem Guten Leben. Rowohlts Enzyklopädie. Wood, A. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ──. (2008). Kantian Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zhang, J. H. (2007). “Understanding Others: Enlarging Iris Murdoch’s Idea of Moral Attention”, presented at 2007 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia. 艾瑞斯•梅鐸(Iris Murdoch)著,梁永安譯,(2003),《大海,大海》,台北:木馬文化。 艾瑞斯•梅鐸(Iris Murdoch)著,江正文譯,(2004),《黑王子》,台北:木馬文化。 約翰•貝禮(John Bayley)著,李永平譯,(2000),《輓歌》,台北:天下文化。 吳秀瑾,(2006),〈關懷倫理的道德蘊涵:試論女性主義的道德知識生產與實踐〉,載於《國立政治大學哲學學報》,第16期,頁107-162。 ──. (2007),〈非公理化的兩種道德實踐智慧:等差性關懷倫理學與道德個別主義〉,載於《東吳哲學學報》,第15期,頁1- 46。 柏拉圖(Plato)等著,(2003),劉小楓等譯,《柏拉圖的《會飲》》,北京:華夏出版社。 亞里士多德(Aristotle),(1999),苗力田編,《亞里士多德選集》〈倫理學卷〉,北京:中國人民出版社。 黃藿,(1999),〈德行倫理學的復興與當代道德教育〉,載於中央大學《社會文化學報》,第9期,頁1-18。 ──. (2003),〈從德行倫理學看道德動機〉,載於《哲學與文化》,第30卷第8期,頁5-19。 孫效智,(2002),〈與他者的關係-倫理學〉,收於沈清松等著,《哲學概論》,五南圖書出版公司。 伯納德特(Seth Benardete)著,張新樟譯,(2005),《神聖的罪業》(Sacred Transgressions: A Reading of Sophocles’Antigone),北京:華夏出版社。 林建福,(2006),《德行、情緒、與道德教育》。台北市:學富文化事業有限公司。 劉亞蘭,(2008),〈我們可以溫柔的互看嗎?論梅洛龐蒂與伊希嘉黑的視覺觀〉,載於《中央大學人文學報》,第34期,頁141-172。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42648 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文以當代英國哲學家兼小說家艾瑞斯・梅朵(Iris Murdoch, 1919-1999)之道德哲學為研究主題,試圖藉由「意識」(consciousness)、「觀視」(vision)與「德行」(virtue)三大概念及層次重構其道德模型,據以回應發展自康德理性啟蒙傳統下的現代道德哲學,為道德能動性提出更充分的說明。
根據梅朵的看法,以「沙特式存在主義」(Sartrean existentialism)與「英美語言行為主義」(Anglo-Saxon linguistic behaviourism)為代表的現代道德哲學將道德行動者化約為孤立的自律理性意志,並將道德能動性的核心放在意志的自由選擇與行動,既忽略對行動者內在生命歷程的觀照,未能為人類豐富多元的道德經驗與現象提供充分的概念與修辭,亦無法適當地解釋道德變化的本質,為人類提出一套有效的成德指引,是不夠周全的道德理論。為了拓寬與深化對人類道德生命之理解,梅朵道德哲學的重心在於恢復道德自我與價值、歷史與社群的連結以及論證內在生命(inner life)的道德意義之上。對她而言,個人不是一座空虛的孤島,而是充滿豐盈的生命內涵,並與他人和世界以及一套超越價值體系之間有著適當關聯的道德行動者,其道德性廣泛地表現在他對自我、他人、世界與價值,以及彼此關係的認知與回應。 基於上述理解,本論文採取梅朵獨特的取徑,試圖證明內在生命的道德性,並提出一個能夠包含行動者諸般內在生命狀態與活動的道德解釋模型,為道德能動性提出更為寬廣且豐厚的說明。論證步驟如下: 首先,為使道德行動者的內涵更為豐富,梅朵以「意識」(consciousness)作為「道德存有的基本模式」,將之界定為一套富含內在生命與價值聯結的能量系統,一方面使得道德自我成為包含活躍豐富之內在生命的連續體,另一方面亦重建起道德自我與價值之間的內在聯結。 第二,藉由「觀視」(vision)隱喻理解道德,建立起一套「道德觀視模型」(vision-model of morality),將道德界定為道德行動者不斷觀視自我與世界的連續歷程,使得道德活動不僅包含意志的選擇與行動,而是舉凡涉及到道德觀視的內在意識狀態或心理事件,諸如知覺、情感與想像力等都具道德意義。 第三,在柏拉圖的啟發下,梅朵將道德成長理解為行動者的道德視界同時也是意識能量品質的轉化與提昇,必須藉由對他者公正且慈愛的關注,才能使意識在善的光照與吸引之下逐漸實現從我執到無私的重新定向。而這也顯示在道德生活中重要的與負責任的不僅是行動實踐的意志力,還有導引意識能量同時提昇觀視品質的關注力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this dissertation I study the English novelist and philosopher Iris Murdoch’s moral philosophy and develop an alternative account of moral agency by reconstructing her ethics of vision in terms of consciousness, vision, virtue and their relations.
According to Iris Murdoch, the Sartrean existentialism and the Anglo-Saxon linguistic behaviourism (often called “the existentialist-behaviourist view”) embraces a constricted picture of morality and moral agency that not only pictures the moral agent as an isolated principle of rational will but locates the core of moral agency in the exertion of the will at the moment of choice, and in turn fails to take into account the moral significance of the agent’s inner lives, such as the quality of seeing, feeling and imagining. In order to broaden and deepen our understanding of the complexity and variety of human moral experience, Murdoch proposes an alternative model which conceives morality as the moral agent’s vision of and response to the complex moral world. In this model the locus of moral agency is broadened and the domain of ethics is extended in the sense that moral activities are no longer restricted to choice and action but include the agent’s perceptions, feelings, and imaginations of self and the world. My argument proceeds in three steps: After examining briefly Murdoch’s criticisms of Sartrean existentialism and the Anglo-Saxon linguistic behaviourism, I argue that Murdoch retrieves the concept of consciousness which consists of rich inner lives and value system to be the fundamental mode of moral being so that the moral lives are no longer restricted to choice and action but include the agent’s inner mental activities. Second, I argue that Murdoch employs the metaphor of vision by which morality is conceived as the moral agent’s seeing of and response to the complex moral world. On this view, not only the willed choice and action but the quality of our vision, feeling and imagining are all morally significant in themselves. Third, resorting to Plato’s philosophy, Murdoch conceives moral growth involving a transformation of the agent’s moral vision that is at the same time a progressively reorientation of consciousness from egoistic concern towards a selfless perspective through a just and loving attention towards others. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:18:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-D91124003-1.pdf: 1124724 bytes, checksum: 18b5b2e6e942a772ebf6e923385502eb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 …………………………………………………………i
中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………ii 英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………iv 本書使用略語說明 …………………………………………………………vi 導論 ………………………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究背景與主題 ………………………………………………… 1 一、梅朵與當代倫理學的發展 ………………………………………… 3 二、研究主題說明 ……………………………………………………… 8 第二節 研究現況評析 ………………………………………………… 11 第三節 研究方法與材料依據 ………………………………………… 15 第四節 章節安排及其主要內容 ……………………………………… 16 第一章 現代道德哲學的貧困 ………………………………………… 19 第一節 形上學與倫理學 …………………………………………… 20 第二節 沙特式存在主義批判 ………………………………………… 22 一、梅朵的沙特研究概論 …………………………………………… 23 二、沙特論意識、自由與價值 ………………………………………… 25 三、總結 ……………………………………………………………… 29 第三節 語言行為主義批判 …………………………………………… 31 一、梅朵的語言行為主義研究概論…………………………………… 31 二、語言行為主義論心靈、自由與價值 ……………………………… 32 三、總結………………………………………………………………… 37 本章小結…………………………………………………………………38 第二章 道德自我的重建 ……………………………………………… 41 第一節 內在生命與道德……………………………………………… 42 一、內在生命的道德意義…………………………………………… 43 二、婆媳之例(M-D example) ………………………………………… 45 三、道德是不斷進步的歷程 ………………………………………… 49 第二節 意識作為道德存有的基本模式…………………………………51 一、意識與內在生命 ………………………………………………… 51 二、意識與善的內在關聯 …………………………………………… 53 第三節 意識的能量系統……………………………………………57 一、佛洛依德對心靈(psyche)的預設與解釋………………………… 57 二、梅朵對柏拉圖Eros概念的援用………………………………… 60 本章小結 ………………………………………………………………… 63 第三章 道德的觀視模型 ……………………………………………… 65 第一節 道德知覺 ………………………………………………………67 一、道德知覺的涵義 ………………………………………………… 67 二、道德知覺即是道德活動 ………………………………………… 71 第二節 道德觀視模型的建立……………………………………………76 一、婆媳之例與觀視隱喻……………………………………………… 76 二、道德觀視模型的建立……………………………………………… 77 第三節 觀視倫理與義務倫理…………………………………………… 86 一、內在與外在………………………………………………………… 86 二、義務概念的必要性………………………………………………… 87 本章小結………………………………………………………………… 90第四章 意識、觀視與德行 …………………………………………… 93 第一節 道德作為靈性朝善之旅………………………………………… 95 一、道德觀視與道德變化…………………………………………… 95 二、道德觀視與意識能量的轉化…………………………………… 97 第二節 道德關注………………………………………………………103 一、關注、意志與道德成長…………………………………………… 103 二、西蒙薇依論「專注」:耐心等候、全心接納……………………… 107 三、梅朵論關注:公正與慈愛的凝視………………………………… 111 第三節 愛的知識 ………………………………………………………115 一、愛是導引道德關注的動能 ………………………………………115 二、愛是個體知識的實現 …………………………………………… 118 本章小結 ………………………………………………………………123 結論 「形上學作為道德之導引」………………………………………125 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………… 131 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 意識、觀視與德行-梅朵論道德能動性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Consciousness, Vision, and Virtue:
Iris Murdoch on Moral Agency | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孫效智,謝世民,黃藿,許漢 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 艾瑞斯・,梅朵(Iris Murdoch),西蒙・,薇依(Simone Weil),道德能動性,道德知覺,意識,觀視,德行,關注,愛, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Iris Murdoch,Simone Weil,moral agency,moral perception,consciousness,vision,virtue,attention,love,Eros, | en |
dc.relation.page | 144 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 哲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。