Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42504
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張祖亮(Tsu-Liang Chang)
dc.contributor.authorNydia Kuei-Feng Shenen
dc.contributor.author沈桂鳳zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T01:15:02Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-12
dc.date.copyright2009-08-12
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-07-28
dc.identifier.citation1. 吳明隆,(2003),SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,臺北市:知城數位科技。
2. 吳迎春、謝明玲,(2008),自然療癒:個人化醫療時代來臨,天下雜誌,412,2008/12。
3. 卓芷聿,(2006),芳香療法的應用-聞香紓緩身心壓力,安寧療護,11(3),312-325。
4. 林佩蓉,(2007),現地與非現地自然情境之偏好、注意力恢復力及心理生理反應之比較,碩士論文,臺灣大學園藝學研究所,臺北市。
5. 邵郊,(1993),生理心理學,臺北市:五南出版社。
6. 洪蘭譯,Medina, J.著,(2009),大腦當家,臺北市:遠流出版社。
7. 胡志鴻譯,Austin, R. L.著,(1998),植栽設計原理,臺北市:地景企業股份有限公司。
8. 張俊彥,(2000),造園設計中植栽色彩對觀賞者效益之研究,造園學報,7(1),45-65。
9. 張俊彥、萬麗玲,(2000),景觀型態對肌電值及注意力恢復能力之研究,造園學報,7(1),1-22。
10. 郭高富、林晏州,(2006),吊籃植物消費行為之研究,臺灣園藝,52(3),297-309。
11. 游恆山譯,Strongman, K. T.著,(2002),情緖心理學:情緖理論的透視,臺北市:五南出版社。
12. 游莞瑋、林晏州,(1999),植栽量體及色彩對降低焦慮情緒效果之研究,中國園藝,45(4),387-394。
13. 黃照婷、林晏州,(2007),草花配色對色彩偏好及色知覺之影響,臺灣園藝,53(4),481-490。
14. 葉德銘,(2008),淨化室內空氣之植物應用及管理手册,臺北市:行政院環境保護署。
15. 葛樹人,(1987),心理測驗學,臺北市:桂冠出版社。
16. 潘德芳、楊世華,(1998),玫瑰消費者之消費行為研究,中華農業研究,47(2),179-186。
17. 盧思聰,(2001),室內觀賞植物:裝飾、養護、欣賞,中國北京:中國林業出版社。
18. 譚詩詠譯,Zeck, R.著,(2006),香氣與心靈:芳香療法之療癒與轉化,臺北市:商周文化。
19. Adachi, M., Rohde, C. L. E., & Kendle, A. D. (2000). Effects of floral and foliage displays on human emotions. HortTechnology, 10(1), 59-63.
20. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary and G. G. Berntson Eds., Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd. ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Grindal Patil, G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, In Press, Accepted Manuscript.
22. Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2007). Psychological benefits of indoor plants in workplaces: Putting Experimental Results into Context. HortScience, 42(3), 581-587.
23. Chang, C. Y., & Chen, P. K. (2005). Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience, 40(5), 1354-1359.
24. Cooper Marcus, C. (2005). Healing gardens in hospitals. The Architecture of Hospitals. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
25. Daniel, T.C. & Boster, R. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: the SBE method. Res. Pap. RM-167. Fort Collins, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain and Range Experiment Station.
26. Diette, G. B., Lechtzin, N., Haponik, E., Devrotes, A., & Rubin, H. R. (2003). Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy. Chest, 123(3), 941-948.
27. Dijkstra, K., Pieterse, M. E., & Pruyn, A. (2008). Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in the built healthcare environment: The mediating role of perceived attractiveness. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 279-283.
28. Dramstad, W. E., Tveit, M. S., Fjellstad, W. J., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006). Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, (78)4, 465-474.
29. Driver, J., & Spence, C. (2000). Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence. Current Biology, 10(20), R731-R735.
30. Hartig, T. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.
31. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109-123.
32. Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Garling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Housing, Theory and Society, 14(4), 175-194.
33. Honeyman, M. K. (1990). Vegetation and stress: a comparison study of varying amounts of vegetation in countryside and urban scenes, p. 143-145. In D. Relf (ed.), The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.
34. Horne, S. H. (2007). Rose Rosa spp. NaturesField, 23(2), 1-2.
35. Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
37. Kaufman, A. J., & Lohr, V. I. (2004). Does plant color affect emotional and physiological responses to landscapes? Acta Horticulture (ISHS) 639, 229-233.
38. Knasko, S. C. (1992). Ambient odor's effect on creativity, mood, and perceived health. Chemical Senses 17(1), 27-35.
39. Larsen, L., Adams, J., Deal, B., Kweon, B. S., & Tyler, E. (1998). Plants in the Workplace: The effects of plant density on productivity, attitudes, and perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 261-281.
40. Lehrner, J., Eckersberger, C., Walla, P., Potsch, G., & Deecke, L. (2000). Ambient odor of orange in a dental office reduces anxiety and improves mood in female patients. Physiology and Behavior, 71(1-2), 83-86.
41. Lehrner, J., Marwinski, G., Lehr, S., Johren, P., & Deecke, L. (2005). Ambient odors of orange and lavender reduce anxiety and improve mood in a dental office. Physiology and Behavior, 86(1-2), 92-95.
42. Lewis, C. A. (1996). Green nature/Human nature. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
43. Liu, M., Mattson, R. H., & Kim, E. (2004). Influences of lavender fragrance and cut flower arrangements on cognitive performance. The International Journal of Aromatherapy, 14, 169-174.
44. Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-Mims, C. H. (2000). Physical discomfort may be reduced in the presence of interior plants. HortTechnology 10(1), 53-58.
45. Matsuo, E. (2008). Redefining and classifying the interrelationship of therapies using plants. In Proceeding of XXVII International Horticultural Congress - IHC2006: International Symposium on Horticultural Practices and Therapy for Human Well-Being.
46. Palomba, D., Sarlo, M., Angrilli, A., Mini, A., & Stegagno, L. (2000). Cardiac responses associated with affective processing of unpleasant film stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology 36(1), 45-57.
47. Park, S.-H., Mattson, R. H., & Kim, E. (2004). Pain tolerance effects of ornamental plants in a simulated hospital patient room. Acta Horticulture (ISHS) 639, 241-247.
48. Parsons, R. J. (2007). Environmental Psychophysiology. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary & G. G. Berntson (eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., Ulrich, R. S., Hebl, M. R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998). The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18(2), 113-140.
50. Salmon, P. G. (2004). A comparison of brief single sessions of physical activity and relaxation meditation on affective responses of female undergraduates. Master Thesis. University of Louisville.
51. Satoh, S., Morita, N., Matsuzaki, I., Konishi, T., Nakano, & T., Minoshita, S. (1996). Relationship between odor perception and depression in the Japanese elderly. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 50(5), 271-275.
52. Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22(3), 265-272.
53. Spielberger, C. D. (1979). Understanding stress and anxiety. New York: Harper and Row.
54. Talbott, J. A., Stern, D., Ross, J., & Gillen, C. (1976). Flowering plants as a therapeutic/environmental agent in a psychiatric hospital. HortScience 11, 365-366.
55. Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15(1), 77-85.
56. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior 13(5), 523-556.
57. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224(4647), 420-421.
58. Ulrich, R. S., & Parsons, R. (1992). Influences of passive experiences with plants on individual well-being and health. In D. Relf (ed.), The Role of horticulture in human well-being and social development: A national symposium (pp. 93-105). Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.
59. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11(3), 201-230.
60. Van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & Van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: How are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(2), 135-146.
61. Wherrett, J. R. (2000). Creating landscape preference models using internet survey techniques. Landscape Research 25(1), 79–96.
62. World Health Organization. (2008). The world health report 2008 primary health care – Now more than ever. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42504-
dc.description.abstract在室內營造紓壓環境可幫助人們面對沈重的生活與工作等壓力,而植物在提升室內環境品質、情緒等都有益處。目前研究已證實室內擺放植物具有多種效益,但並未區分植物花色,或經由視覺與嗅覺等感官刺激造成的差異。視覺與嗅覺刺激物應為同一種植物以避免受測者感官接收不同植物而產生混淆,本研究選擇玫瑰為室內植物材料,將三種花色的玫瑰輪流布置於大學學生宿舍房間裡,並製作環場影片以為視覺刺激物,將玫瑰精油加酒精稀釋後,噴灑於問卷上以揮發香氣以為嗅覺刺激物。實驗處理共分成五組,其中三組為雙重感官刺激〔白玫瑰+香氣(T1)、紅玫瑰+香氣(T2)、與香檳玫瑰+香氣(T3)〕,加上單一嗅覺刺激之香氣組(T4),與視覺刺激之白玫瑰組(T5),以瞭解應用植物於室內環境時經由視覺與嗅覺感官刺激的紓壓效果。
三次的實驗介入包括宿舍房間環境影片、驚悚片、感官刺激等三個時段,感官刺激即是大學宿舍裡各擺放紅、白、與香檳玫瑰,以及沒有花的環場影像,同時依據測驗組分配釋放玫瑰香氣,探討壓力感受與視覺及嗅覺處理之間的關係,測量工具包括房間環境評估(Room Assessment Survey, RAS)以作為量測環境吸引力之工具,狀態焦慮量表(State Anxiety Inventory, SAI)測量心理感受焦慮程度,以及生理回饋儀器(Biofeedback)測量心跳(Heart Rate, HR)與前額肌肌電值(Electromyogram, EMG)以瞭解緊張與放鬆程度,接著探討心理量表與生理反應的變化與關係。
五組測驗組共蒐集166個樣本,各組樣本介於29至39人之間。採用成對樣本T檢定、獨立樣本T檢定、單因子變異數分析、平均值變化圖等進行數據分析,結果顯示,房間內有花的影片大幅地提高環境吸引力,僅聞到香氣不會提高環境吸引力。不同花色玫瑰並沒有造成環境吸引力或心理壓力感受的狀態焦慮值顯著的差異,而白玫瑰與香檳玫瑰搭配白色牆面房間環境的紓壓效果,顯著地影響了生理反應。在雙重感官刺激之三組之中,房間評估值與狀態焦慮值成顯著的負相關。單一或雙重感官刺激都有達到心理上非常顯著的紓壓效果,但是雙重感官刺激進而影響到生理層面的心跳值或肌電值。
研究結果證實,在室內有植物影像或有植物香氣,都能降低壓力,而視覺刺激不但可降低壓力感受,也能提高環境吸引力。本研究中使用的玫瑰切花花色並沒有顯著影響環境吸引力進而影響紓壓效果,但是白色與香檳色玫瑰搭配實驗中的宿舍環境效果較好。最後則對植物材料選用、嗅覺處理、生理回饋儀器操作與判讀、實驗室環境、與應用植物於雙重刺激之可能性等提出建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCreating a relaxing indoor environment is helpful in dealing with stresses from life and work, and plants have been proven to improve indoor environmental quality and physical health. A number of studies have substantiated that flowers and foliage plants in an indoor environment generate psychological benefits, whether stress-relief effects of flower color, or evoked by different sensory stimulations have not been distinguished. This study is proposed to find out how different colors of roses and diluted rose odor influence anxiety perception in a indoor environment.
The experiment included three interventions: a video of a unversity dormitory room as baseline (A phase), a French thriller movie clip to stimulate stress (B phase), and sensory stimuli: the same dormitory room decorated either with white roses, red roses, champagne roses, or no plants at all, along with ambient rose odor (C phase). The experiment adopted four measure tools, psychological scales such as Room Assessment Survey (RAS) for environment attractiveness, and a brief 8-items State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) for stress perception, physical responses of heart rate (HR) and forehead electromyogram (EMG) recorded all through the experiment, while only the three intervention periods have been clipped for analysis.
A total of 166 unversity students were divided into five test groups, either visual (white roses, T5), olfactory (rose odor, T4) or both stimuli (white roses + odor, T1; red roses + odor, T2; champagne roses + odor, T3), while each group has a sample pool from 29 to 39 Taiwan University graduate or undergraduage students. Graphic and statistical analysis includes paired-samples t-test, independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, regression, and histograms. Findings suggest that both olfactory and visual stimuli decrease stress perception, while the later also increases environmental attractiveness. Different colors of roses against white walls may make impacts: all three colors plus rose odor significantly lower stress perception psychologically, while white roses and champagne roses better influence physical responses of HR or EMG. Environmental attractiveness is proven to significantly negatively correlate to state anxiety. Single or double stimuli have no significant difference on state anxiety, however, the latter may make more impact on physical responses.
This study proves that either watching a picture of plants or inhaling plant fragrance in an indoor environment may relieve stress, while visual relaxation becomes effective because environmental attractiveness is increased. Color of rose cutflowers may generate stress-relief effects either by increasing environmental attractiveness, or by color on its own. Discussions and recommentions have been proposed regarding plant material selection, olfactory intervention, operation of biofeedback device, laboratory environment, and double sensory stimulus.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:15:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R96628304-1.pdf: 4363973 bytes, checksum: 06fafe058bd8afc30dda9415f45824ca (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘 要 I
Abstract III
謝 辭 V
總 目 錄 VI
圖 目 錄 IX
表 目 錄 X
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究重要性 3
第四節 名詞解釋 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 自然景觀與植物的心理與生理效益 5
壹、自然景觀的心理效益 5
貳、自然景觀的生理效益 6
第二節 植物對人類的作用 8
第三節 室內植物的作用 9
壹、應用植物於室內視覺環境之效益 9
貳、應用植物於室內嗅覺環境之效益 11
參、應用植物於室內整體之效益 13
第四節 多重感官刺激 14
第五節 壓力與測量工具 14
壹、壓力與焦慮 14
貳、壓力測量工具 16
第三章 研究設計 19
第一節 研究假設 19
第二節 植物材料選擇玫瑰 21
第三節 實驗介入 22
壹、大學宿舍環境裡的實景環場影像 22
貳、電影片段用以提高壓力 24
參、玫瑰香氣 24
第四節 測量工具 25
壹、個人特性與經驗 25
貳、環境吸引力 26
參、壓力感受 26
肆、生理回饋值:心跳與前額肌肌電值 27
第五節 研究對象 29
第六節 實驗流程 30
第七節 測驗組分配 31
第八節 資料分析方法 32
第四章 研究分析結果與討論 36
第一節 測驗組之樣本數 36
第二節 量表信度分析 37
第三節 個人特性與背景分析 38
第四節 受測者對植物的經驗與觀感之分析 38
第五節 實驗介入之作用 43
第六節 視覺與嗅覺感官刺激之作用 45
壹、有無植物對環境吸引力之影響 45
貳、植物花色對環境吸引力之影響 46
參、環境吸引力與壓力感受的關係 47
肆、植物香氣與壓力感受的關係 47
伍、比較視覺與嗅覺雙重感官刺激之紓壓效果 48
第七節 討論 54
壹、實驗設計與測量工具 54
貳、視覺刺激 56
參、嗅覺刺激 57
肆、雙重刺激 57
第五章 結論與建議 59
第一節 結論 59
第二節 後續研究建議 60
壹、植物材料選擇 60
貳、嗅覺刺激 60
參、生理回饋儀器之操作與判讀 61
肆、實驗室環境 61
伍、雙重感官刺激之可能性 62
參考文獻 63
附 錄 68
附錄一、實驗簡報檔檔案 68
附錄二、實驗說明與背景資料問卷 73
附錄三、房間影片(A時段)問卷 74
附錄四、驚悚片(B時段)問卷 76
附錄五、感官刺激(C時段)問卷 77
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject生理回饋zh_TW
dc.subject抒解壓力zh_TW
dc.subject玫瑰切花zh_TW
dc.subject玫瑰精油zh_TW
dc.subject狀態焦慮zh_TW
dc.subject房間環境評估zh_TW
dc.subject環境吸引力zh_TW
dc.subjectStress reliefen
dc.subjectbiofeedbacken
dc.subjectenvironmental attractivenessen
dc.subjectroom assessment survey (RAS)en
dc.subjectstate anxiety inventory (SAI)en
dc.subjectrose essential oilen
dc.subjectrosesen
dc.title經由視覺與嗅覺雙重感官刺激評估室內植物之紓壓效果zh_TW
dc.titleAssessing Stress-Relief Effects of Indoor Plants Evoked by Visual and Olfactory Dual Sensory Stimulien
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張俊彥,陳惠美(Hui-Mei Chen),陳信君(Hsin-Chun Chen),李美芬
dc.subject.keyword抒解壓力,玫瑰切花,玫瑰精油,狀態焦慮,房間環境評估,環境吸引力,生理回饋,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordStress relief,roses,rose essential oil,state anxiety inventory (SAI),room assessment survey (RAS),environmental attractiveness,biofeedback,en
dc.relation.page78
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-07-28
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4.26 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved