請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42462
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇永成(Yong-Chern Su) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsuan-Yin Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王暄茵 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:14:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1988, “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability.” Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3-40.
2. Aitken, M., P. Brown. H.Y. Izan and A. Kua, 1995, “An Intraday Analysis of the Probability of Trading on the ASX at the Asking Price.” Australian Journal of Management, 20, 116-154. 3. Barclay, M. and J. Warner, 1993, “Stealth Trading and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 281-305. 4. Barber, Brad M., and Terrance Odean, 2000, Trading is hazardous to your health: The common stock investment performance of individual investors, Journal of Finance 55,773-806. 5. Barclay, M. J., T. Hendershott and D. T. Mccormick, 2003, “Competition Among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks.” Journal of Finance 58, 2637-2666. 6. Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard Thaler, 2001, Naïve diversification strategies in retirement saving plans, American Economic Review 91, 79-98. 7. Bollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. 8. Chakravarty, S., 2001, “Stealth-trading: Which Traders’ Trades Move Stock Prices?” Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 289-307 9. Chan, Fong, 2000, “Trade Size, Order Imbalance, and Volatility-Volume Relation” Journal of Financial Economics, 57, 247-273. 10. Chau, M. 2004, “Market-Making when Traders Follow Dynamic Order Placement Strategies.” Working Paper, 1-39. 11. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2002, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 111-130. 12. Chordia, T. and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalance and Individual Stock Returns: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 72, 485-518. 13. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2005, “Evidence on the Speed of Convergence to Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 271-292. 14. Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2006, “Liquidity and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 249-268. 15. Copeland, T. E., 1976, “A model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival.” Journal of Finance, 31, 1149-1168. 16. Cornell, Bradford and Richard Roll, 1981, Strategies for pairwise competitions in markets and organizations, Bell Journal of Economics 12, 201-213. 17. D. Katherine Spiess, and John Affleck-Graves, 1995, “Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings,” Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 243-267. 18. Epps, Thomas W., 1979, Comovements in stock prices in the very short run, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 291-298. 19. Fama, Eugene F., 1970, Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work,Journal of Finance 25, 383-417. 20. Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1994, “Strategic Trading with Asymmetric Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 499-518. 21. Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1996, “Strategic Trading When Agents Forecast the Forecasts of Others.” Journal of Finance, 51, 1437-1478. 22. Grossman, S., 1975, “On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets where Trades Have Diverse Information.” Journal of Finance, 31(2), 573-608. 23. Grossman, Sanford J. and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1980, On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets, American Economic Review 70, 393-408. 24. Gallant, R., P. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, 1992, “Stock Prices and Volume.” Review of Financial Studies, 5, 199-242. 25. He, H., and J. Wang, 1995, “Differential Information and Dynamic Behavior of Trading Volume.” Review of Financial Studies, 8, 919-972. 26. Hong, H., and J. Wang, 2000, “Trading and Returns under Periodic Market Closures.” Journal of Finance, 55, 297-354. 27. Karpoff, J., 1987, “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 109-126. 28. Kyle, A., 1985, “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica, 53, 1315-1335 29. Lamoureux, C., and W. Lastrapes, 1990, “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects.” Journal of Finance, 45, 221-229. 30. Lee, M. C., and Ready, M. J., 1991, “Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data,” Journal of Finance, 46, 733-746. 31. Lee, Y. T., Y.J. Liu, R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalances and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 327-343. 32. Lin, J. C., G. C. Sanger, and G. G. Booth, 1995, “Trade Size and Components of the Bid-Ask Spread,” Review of Financial Studies, 8, 1153-1183. 33. Llorente, G., R. Michaely, G. Saar, and J. Wang, 2002, “Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks,” Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1005-1047. 34. Murray Carlson, Adlai Fisher, and Ron Giammarino, 2006, “Corporate investment and asset price dynamics: implications for SEO event studies and long-run performance,” The Journal of Finance, 3, 1009-1034. 35. Odean, Terrance, 1999, Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review 89,1279-1298. 36. Oya Altinkilic, and Robert S. Hansen, 2003, “Discounting and underpricing in seasoned equity offers,” Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 285–323. 37. Patell, James M., and Mark A. Wolfson, 1984, The intra-day speed of adjustment of stock prices to earnings and dividend announcements, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 223- 252. 38. Schwert, G. William, 2001, Anomalies and market efficiency, Chapter 17 in George Constantinides, Milton Harris, and René Stulz, eds., Handbook of the Economics of Finance, (North-Holland: Amsterdam). 39. Siew Hong Teoh, Ivo Welch, and T.J. Wong, 1998, “Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings,” Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 63-99. 40. Srinivasan Rangan, 1998, “Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings,” Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 101-122. 41. Wang, J., 1993, “A Model of Intertemporal Asset Prices under Asymmetric Information,” Review of Economic Studies, 60, 249-282. 42. Wang, F. A., 1998, “Strategic Trading, Asymmetric Information and Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs,” Journal of Financial Markets, 1,321-352. 43. Wang, J., 1994, “A Model of Competitive Stock Trading Volume,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 127-168. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42462 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 對於現金增資這個議題,在財金領域上已經有許多的討論,而在不同的原因解釋之下,我們也知道發行現金增資的公司,最後表現通常沒有其帳上數字來得好。因此,以現金增資的公司為標的,我們想要知道其報酬與當期或是前一期買賣單不平衡之間的關係。此外,我們嘗試發展出一套交易策略,看其是否能擊敗原始報酬率。
首先我們利用日內交易資料去跑多元線性回歸模型,來檢驗同期或前期之買賣單不平衡對報酬率的影響。實證結果顯示,同期買賣單不平衡對報酬率有顯著之正向影響;而前一期的買賣單不平衡對報酬率之影響,在沒有考慮當期時,其影響方向大抵為正向。但以十分鐘為範圍的結果,其影響方向即為負向,我們推論為,十分鐘之內市場還沒完全反應所有資訊,才形成此結果。 另外,我們也以GARCH(1,1)模型觀察股價波動性與買賣單不平衡之間的關係。實證結果顯示,造市者(market maker)對股價波動性的控制良好使得波動性與買賣單不平衡之間的關係並不顯著。也就是說,他們對股票存貨的控制能力足以穩定現金增資公司股價的波動性。接著,我們經由簡單線性回歸模型檢驗市占率大小與買賣單不平衡之間的關係。實證顯示,結果並不顯著,也就是並不存在小型股效果。我們將此解釋為波動性影響的效果,而非小型股本身之效果。 在檢驗完報酬率、買賣單不平衡與波動性之間的關係後,我們嘗試發展出一套交易策略,其分別利用不同的報價(quote price and trade price)為基礎來執行策略。結果顯示,只有利用交易的報價(trade price)作為基礎時,才能擊敗原始報酬率。然而,此策略將交易時間局限在某些特定時間裡。我們相信,如果沒有交易時間的限制,此策略的報酬應該可以更完美。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | There are a lot of discussions about seasoned-equity-offer (SEO), and we know that the firm who makes SEO is always underperformance based on different reasons. Then we want to examine whether there is a relation between return and contemporaneous or lagged order imbalances in SEO firms. Moreover, we want to find if there is any strategy that could beat the original open-to-close return.
First we use intraday transactions to examine the relation between returns and contemporaneous as well as lagged order imbalances by a multi-regression model. The empirical result shows that the contemporaneous imbalances have a significantly positive impact on returns. Moreover, conditional on knowing the current order imbalances, there is a negative relation between lagged-one imbalances and return, except for ten minutes interval. As for the exception of ten minutes interval, we imply that the market might not react to the information completely within ten minutes. In addition, we examine the relation between volatility and order imbalances by a GARCH(1,1) model. The result shows that market makers control volatility so well that the relation between volatility and order imbalances is not strong. Market makers do have the capacity for stabilizing the price volatility of SEO firms. Furthermore, we perform a simple regression model to investigate whether there is any relation between market capitalization and order imbalances. From our empirical result, we cannot find the small firm effect. It shows that the effect comes from volatility but not small firm effect itself. At last, we try to build a trading strategy for the SEO firms after investigating the relation among returns, order imbalances, and volatility. We use quote prices and trade prices to be the basic to implement our strategy, but only the one using trade prices earns a positive return, and beats the original open-to-close return. However, there is a limitation of trading time in our strategy. We believe that the profit could be improved if we can trade without this limitation of trading time. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:14:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96723048-1.pdf: 597382 bytes, checksum: faa2a56be7596af1ba315edd6810698d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………………..1
1.1 Motives and Purposes………………………………………………………….1 1.2 Framework of the Thesis…………………………………………………….....5 Chapter 2 Literature Review…………………………………………….6 2.1 Seasoned Equity Offer…………………………………………………………6 2.2 The Relation between Price and Volume………………………………………8 Chapter 3 Data and Methodology………………………………………10 3.1 Data…………………………………………………………………………....10 3.1.1 Data Sources and Processing Methods………………………………….10 3.1.2 Descriptive Statistics…………………………………………………….12 3.2 Methodology…………………………………………………………………..13 3.2.1 Unconditional Lagged Return-Order Imbalance OLS Model…………...13 3.2.2 Conditional Contemporaneous Return-Order Imbalance OLS Model…..15 3.2.3 Dynamic Volatility-Order Imbalance GARCH(1,1) Model……………..16 3.2.4 Small Firm Effect………………………………………………………..17 Chapter 4 Empirical Results…………………………………………….19 4.1 Unconditional Lagged Return-Order Imbalance OLS Relation………………19 4.2 Conditional Contemporaneous Return-Order Imbalance OLS Relation……...21 4.3 Dynamic Volatility-Order Imbalance GARCH(1,1) Relation…………………23 4.4 Small Firm Effect……………………………………………………………...24 4.5 Trading Strategy……………………………………………………………….25 4.5.1 Trading strategy under the basis of quote price………………………….25 4.5.2 Trading strategy under the basis of trade price…………………………..27 Chapter 5 Conclusion…………………………………………………...30 References…………………………………………………………...… 33 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 現金增資報酬、波動性與買賣單不平衡之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Seasoned -Equity-Offer Return, Volatility, and Order Imbalance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡星陽(Shing-Yang Hu),黃漢青(Han-Ching Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 賣單不平衡, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Order Imbalance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 80 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 583.38 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。