請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42327
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊志新 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Yi Shih | en |
dc.contributor.author | 施維宜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:00:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-11 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-09-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. Vol 55; 2005:74-108.
2. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/, based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site; 2008. 3. 行政院衛生署. 主要癌症申報發生統計. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/衛生統計年報/94/49.xls. 4. 行政院衛生署. 表十二 按疾病別分之個人醫療費用. 國民醫療保健支出. 2006:3. 5. Kutikova L, Bowman L, Chang S, Long SR, Obasaju C, Crown WH. The economic burden of lung cancer and the associated costs of treatment failure in the United States. Lung Cancer. 2005;50:143-154. 6. D'Addario G, Pintilie M, Leighl NB, Feld R, Cerny T, Shepherd FA. Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature. Vol 23; 2005:2926-2936. 7. Huisman C, Smit EF, Giaccone G, Postmus PE. Second-Line Chemotherapy in Relapsing or Refractory Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3722-3730. 8. Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, et al. Multi-Institutional Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2237-2246. 9. Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, et al. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:1527-1537. 10. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, et al. Efficacy of Gefitinib, an Inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, in Symptomatic Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2149-2158. 11. Chih-Hsin Yang J-YSK-CCC-JYT-YYC-PLW-PSC-HGCHG-CCP-C. Survival outcome and predictors of gefitinib antitumor activity in East Asian chemonaive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Vol 107; 2006:1873-1882. 12. Leighl NB, Tsao WS, Zawisza DL, Nematollahi M, Shepherd FA. A willingness-to-pay study of oral epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;51:115-121. 13. Chouaid C, Monnet I, Robinet G, Perol M, Fournel P, Vergnenegre A. Economic impact of gefitinib for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer: a Markov model-based analysis. Current Medical Research and Opinion. July 2007;23:1509-1515. 14. Travis W, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink H, al e. Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Lyon: IARC; 2004. 15. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) Limited-Use Data (1973-2005): National Cancer Institute , DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch. 16. Alberg AJ, Samet JM. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. CHEST. 2003;123:21S. 17. Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. CHEST. 1997;111:1710-1717. 18. Hyde L, Hyde C. Clinical manifestations of lung cancer. CHEST. 1974;65:299-306. 19. Christopher G. Chute ERGJBRKJBJY. Presenting conditions of 1539 population-based lung cancer patients by cell type and stage in new hampshire and vermont. Cancer. 1985;56:2107-2111. 20. Silvestri GA, Littenberg B, Colice GL. The clinical evaluation for detecting metastatic lung cancer. A meta- analysis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995;152:225-230. 21. Midthun DE. Overview of the initial evaluation, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer UpToDate; 2008. 22. Le Chevalier T, Arriagada R, Quoix E, et al. Radiotherapy Alone Versus Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Nonresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: First Analysis of a Randomized Trial in 353 Patients. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1991;83:417-423. 23. Morton RF, Jett JR, McGinnis WL, et al. Thoracic Radiation Therapy Alone Compared with Combined Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;115:681-686. 24. Dillman RO, Seagren SL, Propert KJ, et al. A randomized trial of induction chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation versus radiation alone in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:940-945. 25. Schaake-Koning C, van den Bogaert W, Dalesio O, et al. Effects of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy on inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:524-530. 26. Sause WT, Scott C, Taylor S, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 88-08 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4588: Preliminary Results of a Phase III Trial in Regionally Advanced, Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995;87:198-205. 27. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative G. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 1995;311:899-909. 28. Ranson M, Davidson N, Nicolson M, et al. Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Supportive Care Versus Supportive Care for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1074-1080. 29. Roszkowski K, Pluzanska A, Krzakowski M, et al. A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer. 2000;27:145-157. 30. Spiro SG , Rudd RM , Souhami RL , et al. Chemotherapy versus supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: improved survival without detriment to quality of life. Thorax. 2004;59:828- 836. 31. Weick JK, Crowley J, Natale RB, et al. A randomized trial of five cisplatin-containing treatments in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1157-1162. 32. O'Connell JP, Kris MG, Gralla RJ, et al. Frequency and prognostic importance of pretreatment clinical characteristics in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with combination chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:1604-1614. 33. Le Chevalier T, Brisgand D, Douillard JY, et al. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:360-367. 34. Johnson DH, Paul DM, Hande KR, et al. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2054-2060. 35. Bonomi P, Kim K, Fairclough D, et al. Comparison of Survival and Quality of Life in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Two Dose Levels of Paclitaxel Combined With Cisplatin Versus Etoposide With Cisplatin: Results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:623-. 36. Hotta K, Matsuo K, Ueoka H, Kiura K, Tabata M, Tanimoto M. Addition of platinum compounds to a new agent in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a literature based meta-analysis of randomised trials. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1782-1789. 37. Langer CJ, Manola J, Bernardo P, et al. Cisplatin-Based Therapy for Elderly Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5592, a Randomized Trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2002;94:173-181. 38. Maestu I, Gomez-Aldaravi L, Torregrosa MD, et al. Gemcitabine and low dose carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2003;42:345-354. 39. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92-98. 40. Souquet PJ, Chauvin F. Polychemotherapy in advanced non small lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Lancet. 1993;342:19. 41. Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2354-2362. 42. Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, et al. Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2095-2103. 43. Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA, Jr., et al. Molecular Predictors of Outcome With Gefitinib in a Phase III Placebo-Controlled Study in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5034-5042. 44. Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Manegold C, et al. Gefitinib in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial--INTACT 1. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:777-784. 45. Herbst RS, Giaccone G, Schiller JH, et al. Gefitinib in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial--INTACT 2. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:785-794. 46. Perez-Soler R, Chachoua A, Hammond LA, et al. Determinants of Tumor Response and Survival With Erlotinib in Patients With Non--Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3238-3247. 47. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:123-132. 48. Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, et al. TRIBUTE: A Phase III Trial of Erlotinib Hydrochloride (OSI-774) Combined With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5892-5899. 49. Janne PA, Gurubhagavatula S, Yeap BY, et al. Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib (ZD1839, [`]Iressa') on an expanded access study. Lung Cancer. 2004;44:221-230. 50. Chih-Hsin Yang J-YSK-CCC-JYT-YYC-PLW-PSC-HGCHG-CCP-C. Survival outcome and predictors of gefitinib antitumor activity in East Asian chemonaive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2006;107:1873-1882. 51. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from 'never smokers' and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101:13306-13311. 52. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129-2139. 53. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy. Science. 2004;304:1497-1500. 54. Pao W, Wang TY, Riely GJ, et al. KRAS Mutations and Primary Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib. PLoS Medicine. 2005;2:e17. 55. Chouaïd C, Molinier L, Combescure C, Daur癡s JP, Housset B, Vergnen癡gre A. Economics of the clinical management of lung cancer in France: an analysis using a Markov model. British Journal of Cancer. 2004;90:397-402. 56. Ramsey SD, Clarke L, Kamath TV, Lubeck D. Evaluation of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on the budget of a U.S. health insurance plan. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy. 2006;12:472-478. 57. Chouaid C MI, Robinet G, Perol M, Fournel P, Vergnenegre A. Economic impact of gefitinib for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer: a Markov model-based analysis. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2007;23:1509-1515. 58. Moldvay J. [Financial aspects of targeted therapy of lung cancer as compared to conventional chemotherapy]. Magyar onkologia. 2007;51:191-196. 59. Carlson JJ, Reyes C, Oestreicher N, Lubeck D, Ramsey SD, Veenstra DL. Comparative clinical and economic outcomes of treatments for refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer.In Press, Corrected Proof. 60. Sacristán JA, Kennedy-Martin T, Rosell R, et al. Economic evaluation in a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2000;28:97-107. 61. Clegg A, Scott DA, Hewitson P, Sidhu M, Waugh N. Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Thorax. 2002;57:20-28. 62. Neymark N, Lianes P, Smit EF, van Meerbeeck JP. Economic Evaluation of Three Two-Drug Chemotherapy Regimens in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. PharmacoEconomics. 2005;23:1155-1166. 63. Maniadakis N, Fragoulakis V, Pallis A, Prezerakos P, Georgoulias V. Economic evaluation of docetaxel/gemcitabine versus docetaxel as frontline treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Greece. Lung Cancer. 2007;58:275-281. 64. Tada H, Matsui S, Kawahara M, Hosoe S, Hamada C, Fukushima M. Efficacy, toxicity and cost analysis for non-platinum triplet (gemcitabine and vinorelbine, followed by docetaxel) vs. platinum-based chemotherapy in IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: single-institution experience. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2008;17:120-126. 65. 中央健康保險局. 全民健康保險 [Power Point]. 2008/01/21. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/, 2008. 66. 中央健康保險局. 全民健保法規及公告查詢-明細資料. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/inquire/query6_detail.asp?Bulletin_ID=820. Accessed 6/30, 2008. 67. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economics Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. 68. Nandita Mitra AI. A propensity score approach to estimating the cost-effectiveness of medical therapies from observational data. Health Economics. 2005;14:805-815. 69. Earle CC, Tsai JS, Gelber RD, Weinstein MC, Neumann PJ, Weeks JC. Effectiveness of Chemotherapy for Advanced Lung Cancer in the Elderly: Instrumental Variable and Propensity Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1064-1070. 70. Kuo S-H, Yang C-H, Yu C-J, Hsu C, Cheng A-L, Yang P-C. Survival of stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who received chemotherapy but did not participate in clinical trials. Lung Cancer. 2005;48:275-280. 71. Yang C-H, Yu C-J, Shih J-Y, et al. Specific EGFR Mutations Predict Treatment Outcome of Stage IIIB/IV Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving First-Line Gefitinib Monotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2745-2753. 72. Reck M, Buchholz E, Schott-von-Römer K, Krützfeldt K, Gatzemeier U, Manegold C. Gefitinib Monotherapy in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Inoperable Stage III/IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2006;7:406-411. 73. Niho S, Kubota K, Goto K, et al. First-Line Single Agent Treatment With Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:64-69. 74. Giaccone G, Gallegos Ruiz M, Le Chevalier T, et al. Erlotinib for Frontline Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Phase II Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6049-6055. 75. Ramsey SD, Howlader N, Etzioni RD, Donato B. Chemotherapy Use, Outcomes, and Costs for Older Persons With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Evidence From Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4971-4978. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42327 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:
針對末期非小細胞肺癌的患者,評估標靶藥物gefitinib治療與合併化學藥物治療的存活時間與醫療費用。以中央健康保險局為觀點,透過經濟評估與分析,提供衛生政策或藥品給付通則修訂時的參考依據。 設計: 單一醫學中心,前瞻性臨床試驗與回溯性病歷分析研究。 地點: 國立臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院。 對象: 2001年1月1日至2007年6月30日期間,初診斷為末期非小細胞肺癌的患者。臨床試驗組以第一線標靶藥物gefitinib或是第一線合併化學藥物治療作為病患分組依據。後線使用gefitinib藥物治療組以患者的病程中使用gefitinib藥物治療時期不同而分為第二線治療或第三線治療組。 方法: 以病人首次使用藥物的日期作為起始日期,於追蹤期間於院內的就診紀錄與費用,均視為治療肺癌的直接醫療成本,醫療費用的呈現為醫院向中央健保局申報的價格,只計算直接成本的醫療費用部份,不考慮間接成本與無形成本。病患的存活時間、死亡事件、整體存活率、疾病緩解期、治療藥物的組合內容皆納入治療效果的評估。統計分析以比例風險迴歸模式,找出可能影響醫療成本的因子,依據影響因子作分組病患的最低成本分析與成本效果分析。 結果: 研究期間內參與第一線gefitinib治療臨床試驗的106位病患,存活中位數22.4月,平均個人終身累積總費用850,231元,一年累積總費用752,374元,二年累積總費用1,236,669元;第一線治療期(gefitinib時期)的每月總費用為72,434元,第二線治療期54,937元,第三線治療期112,271元,緩和醫療期66,226元;於追蹤期間死亡患者有48名(45.3%),一年存活率31.3%,存活中位數9.6月,終身累積總費用最多人數7人(14.6%)分布於10- 20萬元。 參與第一線合併化學藥物治療臨床試驗的182位患者,存活中位數16.7月,平均個人終身累積總費用928,041元,一年累積總費用624,299元,二年累積總費用832,938元;第一線治療期的每月總費用為81,839元,第二線治療期63,767元,第三線治療期63,854元,緩和醫療期51,492元;於追蹤期間內死亡患者共157名(86.3%),存活中位數14.4月,終身累積總費用最多人數17人(10.8%)分布於80- 90萬元。 以gefitinib作後線治療的患者之中,33位第二線gefitinib治療的病患,自第一線藥物治療始起至最後追蹤日期的存活中位數36.7月,平均終身累積總費用1,271,733元,使用gefitinib時間6.6月,自使用gefitinib始起至最後追蹤日期的存活中位數為27.6月,gefitinib期間的醫療總費用571,401元,每月醫療總費用167,063元。70名第三線gefitinib治療的患者,自第一線藥物治療始起至最後追蹤日期的存活中位數28.6月,平均終身累積總費用1,328,475元,使用gefitinib時間7.1月,自使用gefitinib始起至最後追蹤日期的存活中位數為11.4月,gefitinib期間的醫療總費用455,200元,每月醫療總費用114,816元。 迴歸模式分析結果,發現影響患者的第一次疾病緩解期和終身累積費用的因子為第一線使用藥物組別、年齡、女性且腺癌。臨床試驗組中,年齡小於65歲、女性且腺癌的患者,第一線gefitinib組與第一線合併化學藥物治療組的成本效果差異比為每月26,859元。 結論: 我們的研究顯示影響末期非小細胞肺癌患者的醫療成本因子為第一線使用藥物組別、年齡、女性且腺癌;若年齡小於65歲、女性且腺癌的患者,第一線gefitinib組與第一線合併化學藥物治療組的成本效果差異小於平均每人每年GDP值,以醫療經濟而言,應屬可接受的範圍內,但仍須以患者與社會的福祉作為優先考量。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and mean medical cost for patients treated with gefitinib or combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Economic analysis was carried out based on the perspective of the Bureau of National Health Insurance(BNHI)in Taiwan to evaluate the cost and benefit of the treatments in order to provide references for health policy or guidelines for drugs price adjustment in the future. Design: This study consisted of a prospective clinical trial in conjunction with a retrospective chart-review using data from a single medical center. Setting: Data for this study was obtained from the National Taiwan University Hospital(NTUH). Study subjects: Adult patients who had an initial diagnosis of advanced NSCLC between January 1, 2001 and June 30, 2007 were included in the study. The clinical trial group consisted of first line gefitinib treatment or combination chemotherapy patients. The rear use gefitinib group patients were categorized into second line or third line treatment according to their individual health states. Methods: The study spanned the period from the patients’ first drug-taking date to the censored date of the study, and all activities were assumed to be related to the treatment for NSCLC that will be absorbed into the medical management expense. The management costs represented costs reimbursed to NTUH from BNHI, and only direct costs were accounted. The survival time, death event, overall survival rate, time to progression, and treatment regimens were included in patients’ clinical assessment. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify predictors for the management costs. The identified predictors were then utilized in the analyses of cost minimization and cost effectiveness. Results: During the study period, 106 patients were involved in the first line gefitinib therapy for the NSCLC trial. The median survival time was 22.4 months, and the mean lifetime total management cost was 850,231 NTD. One-year and two-year cumulative total costs were 752,374 NTD and 1,236,669 NTD, respectively. The cost for the first line gefitinib treatment period was 72,434 NTD per month, while that for the second line, third line, and palliative treatment periods were 54,937 NTD, 112,271 NTD, and 66,226 NTD, respectively. Forty-eight patients(45.3%)had deceased during our study period. Their 1-year survival rate was 31.3%, and their median survival time was 9.6 months. Their highest count in the number of patients for lifetime NSCLC treatment cost fell into the 100- 200 thousand NTD stratification—there was seven(14.6%). There were 182 patients involved in the first line combination chemotherapy for the NSCLC trial. The median survival time was 16.7 months, and the mean lifetime total management cost was 928,041 NTD. One-year and two-year cumulative total costs respectively were 624,299 NTD and 832,938 NTD. The cost of the first line treatment period was 81,839 NTD per month, while that of the second line, third line, and palliative treatment periods were 63,767 NTD, 63,854 NTD, and 51,492 NTD, respectively. There were 157 patients(86.3%)who had deceased within our study period. Their median survival time was 14.4 months, and the highest count for lifetime cost was 17 patients (10.8%)who fell into the 800- 900 thousand NTD stratification. There were 33 end-stage NSCLC patients treated with second line gefitinib therapy. The median survival time was 36.7 months, the mean lifetime total treatment cost was 1,271,733 NTD, the average gefitinib duration was 6.6 months, the survival time after starting gefitinib was 27.6 months, the total cost of gefitinib period was 571,401 NTD, and the monthly cost was 167,063 NTD. There were 70 patients treated with the third line gefitinib therapy for compassionate use. Their median survival time was 28.6 months; mean lifetime total treatment cost, 1,328,475 NTD; average gefitinib duration, 7.1 months; survival time after starting gefitinib, 11.4 months; total cost of gefitinib period, 455,200 NTD; and monthly cost, 114,816 NTD. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that first line drug treatment option, age, gender and the status of adenocarcinoma were significant predictors for the first time to progression cost and the lifetime cumulative cost. Among the clinical trial study, for female patients with adenocarcinoma under the age of 65, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of first line gefitinib therapy in comparison with first line chemotherapy was 26,859 NTD per month. Conclusions: Our study showed that end-stage NSCLC patients’ management cost was associated with first line drug treatment option, age, gender and the presence or absence of adenocarcinoma. For patients who were female, under 65 years old and had adenocarcinoma, the difference between the ICER of first line gefitinib therapy and that of first line chemotherapy was smaller than Gross Domestic Product(GDP)per capital. This result appeared to be acceptable in terms of medical economics, but chiefly for the advantage of patients and societies should be the prior consideration. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:00:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94451004-1.pdf: 739415 bytes, checksum: 6e5f88267700e3943daad5d76856b784 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 導論 1
第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 非小細胞肺癌 3 第二節 標靶藥物治療末期非小細胞肺癌的經濟評估 11 第三節 化學藥物治療末期非小細胞肺癌的經濟評估 15 第四節 臺灣的全民健康保險簡介 19 第三章 研究目的 23 第四章 研究方法 24 第一節 研究架構 24 第二節 研究地點與對象 25 第三節 經濟評估分析 35 第四節 統計分析方法 43 第一節 臨床試驗:第一線gefitinib治療組 vs. 第一線合併化學藥物治療組 46 第二節 後線使用gefitinib:第二線治療組 & 第三線治療組 76 第六章 討論 84 第一節 病患納入過程與基本特徵 84 第二節 第一線藥物治療的醫療成本 86 第三節 後線使用gefitinib的醫療成本 90 第四節 醫療成本效果與文獻比較 90 第五節 研究限制 94 第六節 未來研究建議 95 第七章 結論 96 參考文獻 98 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 使用gefitinib或化學治療對末期非小細胞肺癌病患的醫療費用及成本效果分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Management Costs and Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Gefitinib or Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage IIIB or IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 余忠仁,楊銘欽 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 醫療經濟評估,藥物經濟評估,非小細胞肺癌,標靶治療,第一線gefitinib治療, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Medical-economic analysis,Pharmacoeconomic analysis,Non-small cell lung cancer,Target therapy,first line gefitinib therapy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 106 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-08-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床藥學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床藥學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 722.08 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。