請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42292
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭雅文 | |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Rong Li | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李佩蓉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:58:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-11 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-09-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-08-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
1. 王保進:視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。2002,二版,心理出版社股份有限公司出版。 2. 王超群:資方經營更吃力,勞工流動率增加。工商時報,2004/06/12,http://www.ctwu.org.tw/other/laborlaw/chuce.htm#chuce6。 3. 史麗珠、李絳桃、徐亞瑛、高淑芬、徐麗華、陳美伶譯(Ploit DF & Hungler BP著):護理研究法。1999,初版,桂冠圖書股份有限公司出版。 4. 行政院主計處,中華民國統計資訊網。2008, http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=17144&ctNode=517。 5. 行政院勞工委員會,勞工法令查詢系統。2008, http://laws.cla.gov.tw/Chi/FLAW/FLAWDAT01.asp?lsid=FL030634。 6. 李誠、辛炳隆、成之約:勞動市場彈性化與非典型僱用。2000,行政院勞委會委託計畫。 7. 林素貞:企業使用非典型勞動的原因與影響之研究。2001,中國文化大學勞工研究所。 8. 吳東霖、林傑斌、劉明德編著:SAS與統計模式建構。2002,初版,文魁資訊股份有限公司出版。 9. 吳靜惠:談人力派遣發展趨勢,如何追求勞動彈性化效益。中國時報,中時人力網,2007/11/05, http://www.ctjob.com.tw/JobNews/JobNews.aspx?ArticleId=1023&NewsTypeId=5。 10. 陳秋蓉、鄭雅文、胡佩怡:「國內勞工工作相關過勞與心理社會因子之認知調查」。2003,行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。 11. 張令慧:勞退新制衝擊,工作外包將盛行。工商時報,2004/06/13, http://www.ctwu.org.tw/other/laborlaw/chuce.htm#chuce6。 12. 張晏蓉、葉婉榆、陳春萬、陳秋蓉、石東生、鄭雅文:台灣受僱者疲勞的分布狀況與相關因素。台灣衛誌2007;26:75-87。 13. 勞動保障雙月刊:2007,第17期。行政院勞工委員會勞工保險局全球資訊網,http://www.bli.gov.tw/publish.asp。 14. 禁止勞動派遣民主行動聯盟新聞稿。勞動黨桃竹苗勞工服務中心,2005/10/01,http://tzm.laodongdang.org/_tzm/news/051001-3.htm。 15. 楊偉中:台灣勞動彈性化與國家角色-以勞工法律修改為中心。2007,http://linkage.ngo.org.tw/redmole/no3/R0307.htm。 16. 鄭雅文:產業邊遷與職業安全健康。2003 March 30。 17. 鄭津津:派遣勞動之法律關係與相關法律問題之研究。國立中正大學法學集刊,1999;2:237-256。 18. 簡建忠:台灣派遣勞工對派遣工作看法之研究。勞資關係論叢,1999;9:99-124。 英文文獻 1. Adamson J, Gooberman-Hill R, Woolhead G, Donovan J. ‘Questerviews’: using questionnaires in qualitative interviews as a method of integrating qualitative and quantitive health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004;9:139-45. 2. Bartley M. Unemployment and ill-health: understanding the relationship. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994; 48:333-7. 3. Bartley M, Ferrie J. Glossary: unemployment, job insecurity, and health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55:776-81. 4. Benach J, Benavides FG, PlattS, Diez-Roux A, Muntaner C. The health-damaging potential of new types of flexible employment: a challenge for public health researchers. American Journal of Public Health 2000; 90:1316-17. 5. Benavides FG, Benach J, Diez-Roux AV, Roman C. How do types of employment relate to health indicators? Findings from the second European survey on working conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54:494-501. 6. Benach J, Amable M, Muntaner C, Benavides FG. The consequences of flexible work for health: are we looking at the right place? J Epidemiol Community Health, 2002; 56:405-406. 7. Burr H, Bjorner JB, Kristensen TS, Tuschsen F, Bach E. Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990-2000 and their associations with labor-force changes. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003; 294:290-9. 8. Beckers D GJ, van der Linden D, Smulders P GW, Kompier M AJ, Veldhoven M JPM, van Yperen NW. Working Overtime hours: relations with fatigue, work motivation, and the quality of work. J Occup Environ Med 2004; 46: 1282-9. 9. Borritz M, Rugulies R, Bjorner JB, Villadsen E, Mikkelsen OA, Kristensen TS. Burnout among employees in human service work: design and baseline findings of the PUMA study. Scandinavian Journal of Public health 2006;34:49-58. 10. Benavides FG, Benach J, Muntaner C, Delclos GL, Catot N, Amable M. Associations between temporary employment and occupational injury: what are the mechanisms? Occup Environ Med 2006; 63:416-21. 11. Broom DH, D’souza RM, Strazdins L, Butterworth P, Parslow R, Rodgers B. The lesser evil: bad jobs or unemployment? A survey of mid-ages Australians. Social Science & Medicine 2006; 63:575-86. 12. Benach J, M, Muntaner C. Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61:276-7. 13. Cheng Y, Guo YL, Yeh WY. A national survey of psychosocial job stressors and their implications for health among working people in Taiwan. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2001; 74:495-504. 14. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter C O.L.H., Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001;86:425-45. 15. Colquitt JA. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001;86:386-400. 16. Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2001;58:164-209. 17. Cheng Y, Chen CW, Chen CJ, Chiang TL. Job insecurity and its association to health among employees in the Taiwanese general population. Social Science & Medicine 2005;61:41-52. 18. Donovan MA, Drasgow F, Munson LJ. The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998;83:683-92. 19. Domenighetti G, D’Avanzo B, Bisig B. Health effects of job insecurity among employees in the Swiss general population. Int J Health Serv 2000; 30:477-90. 20. Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Helkama K. Organizational justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001;86:418-24. 21. Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J. Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health 2002;92:105-8. 22. Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Kltikangas-Jarvinen L. Sleeping problems and health behaviors as mediators between organizational justice and health. Health Psychology 2003;22:287-93. 23. Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Steen N, Vahtera J. Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: multilevel covariance structure analysis. Social Science & Medicine 2004;58:1659-69. 24. Elovainio M, Van Den Bos K, Linna A, Kivimaki M, Ala-Mursula L, Pentti J, Vahtera J. Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Social Science & Medicine 2005;61:2501-12. 25. Eurostat, 2008, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/ 26. Fenwick R, Tausig M. The Macroeconomic context of job stress. Journal of Health and Social behavior 1994; 35:266-82. 27. Ferrie JE. Is job insecurity harmful to health? J R Soc Med 2001; 94:71-6. 28. Ferrie JE, Shipley MJ, Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG. Effects of chronic job insecurity and change in job security on self report health, minor psychiatric morbidity, physiological measures, and health related behaviours in British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56:450-4. 29. Gimeno D, Benavides FG, Amick III, Benach J, Martinez JM. Psychosocial factors and work related sickness absence among permanent and non-permanent employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58:870-6. 30. Greenhalgh L, Rosenblatt Z. Job insecurity: toward conceptual clarity. The Academy of Management Review 1984; 9:438-48. 31. Judge TA, Colquitt JA. Organizational justice and stress: the mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004;89:395-404. 32. Karasek R, Brisson C, Amick B. The Job content questionnaire(JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 1998;3:322-55. 33. Kristensen TS, Borg V, Hannerz H. Socioeconomic status and psychosocial work environment: results from a Danish national study. Scand J Public Health 2002; 30:41-48. 34. Kivimaki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Virtanen M, Stansfeld SA. Association between organizational inequity and incendence of psychiatric disorders in female employees. Psychological Medicine 2003;33:319-26. 35. Kivimaki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Ferrie JE. Organizational justice and health of employees: prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:27-34. 36. Kivimaki M, Ferrie JE, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG. Organizational justice and change in justice as predictors of employee health: the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58:931-7. 37. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 2005;19:192-207. 38. Lerner DJ, Levine S, Malspeis S, D’Agostino RB. Job strain and health-related quality of life in a national sample. American Journal of Public Health 1994;84:1580-5. 39. Lee S, Colditz GA, Berkman LF, Kawachi I. Prospective study of job insecurity and coronary heart disease in US women. Ann Epidemiol 2004;14:24-30. 40. Leventhal GS. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R(Eds.), Social exchange: advances in theory and research(pp.27-55). New York: Plenum. 41. Li J, Yang W, Cheng Y, Siegrist J, Cho S. Effort-reward imbalance at work and job dissatisfaction in Chinese healthcare workers: a validation study. Int Arch Occup Environ health 2005;78:198-204. 42. Moorman RH. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology 1991;76:845-55. 43. McDonough P. Job insecurity and health. Int J Health Serv 2000;30:453-76. 44. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job Burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:397-422. 45. Mallinson S. Listening to the respondents: a qualitative assessment of the short-form 36 health status questionnaire. Social Science & Medicine 2002; 54:11-21. 46. Niehoff BP, Moorman RH. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal 1993;36:527-56. 47. Richards JC, Alvarenga M, Hof A. Serum lipids and their relationships with hostility and angry affect and behaviors in men. Health Psychology 2000;19:393-8. 48. Skarlicki DP, Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997;82:434-43. 49. Schmitt M, Dorfel M. Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. Eur J Soc Psychol 1999;29:443-53. 50. Stansfeld SA, Fuhrer R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG. Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:302-7. 51. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R. The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine 2004;58:1483-99. 52. Siegrist J. Work, health and welfare: new challenges. Int J Soc Welfare 2006;15(Suppl. 1):S5-S12. 53. Tata J. Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles. The Journal of Psychology 2000;134:261-8. 54. Virtanen M, Kivimaki M, Joensuu M, Virtanen P, Elovainio M. Temporary employment and health: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 34:610-22. 55. Virtanen P, Saloniemi A, Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Virtanen M, Koskenvuo M. The working conditions and health of non-permanent employees: are there differences between private and public labour markets? Economic and Industry Democracy 2006;1:39-65. 56. Weiss HM, Suckow K. Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999;5:786-94. 57. Wainwright D, Calnan M. Work stress: the making of a modern epidemic. Buckingham Phildelphia, Open University Press, 2002. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42292 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來國外流行病學研究指出,工作職場中「工作缺乏保障」與「組織正義」低落,乃是工作壓力疾病的危險因子。追蹤性研究指出,「工作缺乏保障」本身即為一個慢性壓力來源(Ferrie et al., 2002)。缺乏保障的工作較易出現在低技術與低階層的族群,由於這些族群的工作性質可能較具有風險、勞動條件較差,進而也有較高的職業傷害與意外(Benach, 2000; Benavides et al., 2006)。且「工作缺乏保障」者在職場特質上有較高的工作負荷與工作壓力,工作控制低,這些不利的工作情境可能會惡化工作者的健康(Fenwick & Tausig, 1994; Kristensen et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2005)。職場中,感受「組織正義」低落的工作者與負向的情緒感受、睡眠問題、心理憂傷、罹患輕微精神疾病、病假與自評健康狀況不佳等方面有顯著關聯(Weiss & Suckow, 1999; Elovainio et al., 2001 & 2002; Kivimaki et al., 2003)。
相關研究以歐美國家為多,且多數僅以單題調查「工作缺乏保障」。而台灣的研究相對較為缺乏,又台灣的勞動市場特性較為特殊,產業結構以中小企業為多數,勞僱關係可能較不穩固,且近幾年來工作越來越沒有保障,職場中的管理制度,也可能對工作者的身心健康造成影響。勞委會於2007年對工作者的安全衛生與健康狀況調查新加入「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」面向,希冀能瞭解國內的相關分佈狀況與對工作者的影響。由於使用的「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」量表僅參考相關文獻後研製,未進行前驅性研究,故本研究於事後檢驗「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」量表的信效度。 本研究目的有四:首先,評估「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」量表之信效度;第二,瞭解受僱者族群中「就業缺乏保障」的盛行情形與社會分佈狀況;第三,分析「就業缺乏保障」在不同社會人口族群的分佈差異,並探討缺乏保障的工作之職場社會心理特質,如「職場正義」、「工作控制」、「工作負荷」等;第四,分析「就業缺乏保障」與受僱者疲勞狀況的相關性。 研究方法包含量性問卷調查與質性問卷訪談兩種。量性資料來源是行政院主計處與勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所於2007年9月所辦理的「工作環境安全衛生狀況認知調查」之受訪者,採分層隨機抽樣方式,以取得全國代表性樣本;以受訪者自填問卷的方式進行資料收集,從調查對象中擷取25歲~65歲的受僱工作者進行資料分析,人數總計為17,042。為評估「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」量表之信效度,本研究也進行個案質性問卷訪談,以瞭解受訪者如何回應問卷題目,受訪對象是依照性別、教育程度與年齡的目的性條件取樣,總共訪談10位25歲~65歲的受僱工作者。 結果發現,「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」量表內部一致性佳(Cronbach’s alpha值皆在0.76以上),信度良好;然而在建構效度方面,負向題未歸屬於同一因素中,效度結果較不理想;且質性訪談亦發現部分題目的缺失。全國受僱者調查結果發現,國中以下教育程度、藍領職等、任職於100人以下中小企業、從事電力燃氣或營造業,屬於約聘雇、臨時性、短期性、季節性契約一類與無底薪的受僱者,「就業缺乏保障」較嚴重。處於「就業缺乏保障」的工作者,「職場正義」低落、工作控制低、心理負荷大,且工作壓力大與工作不滿意的情形也較高。最後,多變項回歸分析發現,「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」較低的受僱工作者,疲勞程度較嚴重。 本研究結果指出,低社經階層的工作者「就業缺乏保障」較嚴重,且伴隨著較不利的職場特質,對職業健康有負面影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:58:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95845114-1.pdf: 795407 bytes, checksum: 0b4bb4ed4ece1eeff8930c8717e338c6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌 謝 I
摘 要 II Abstract IV 目 錄 VII 表圖目次 VIII 第一章 緒 論 1 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節「就業保障」的理論、概念與測量 4 第二節「就業保障」對工作者健康之影響:致病機制與流行病學文獻回顧 5 第三節「職場正義」的理論、概念與測量 14 第四節「職場正義」對工作者健康之影響:致病機制與流行病學文獻回顧 20 第五節 研究重要性 22 第三章 「就業缺乏保障」與「職場正義」問卷量表之信效度分析 24 第一節 前 言 24 第二節 材料與方法 26 第三節 結 果 30 第四節 討 論 53 第四章 「就業缺乏保障」對職場社會心理特質與受僱者疲勞之影響 58 第一節 前 言 58 第二節 材料與方法 60 第三節 結 果 65 第四節 討 論 90 第五章 結論與建議 95 參考文獻 98 附錄一 104 受僱者『就業缺乏保障』與『職場正義』問卷之質性訪談研究紀錄表 104 參與研究同意書 107 附錄二 2007年採用的問卷調查項目內容 108 附錄三 表 格 112 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「就業保障」、「職場正義」與受僱者疲勞:
量表信效度分析與調查研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | ‘Employment Security’, ‘Workplace Justice’ and Employees’ Burnout: Reliability and Validity of the Questionnaire Instrument and Results from a Survey | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉梅君,徐儆暉,丁志音 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 「就業保障」,「職場正義」,受僱者,信度,效度,疲勞,全國性調查, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ‘employment security’,‘workplace justice’,employees,reliability,validity,burnout,nation-wide survey, | en |
dc.relation.page | 123 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-08-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 衛生政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 776.76 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。