請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42104
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 孫效智(Hsiao-Chih Sun) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Jung Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳奕融 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:46:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-09-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-09-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-08-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、康德著作譯本
Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from A Pragmatic Point of View, trans. by Victor Lyle Dowdell, rev. and ed. by Hans H. Rudnick, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978. ---- Correspondence, trans. and ed. by Arnulf Zweig, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. ---- Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by Norman Kemp Smith, New York: Humanities Press, 1929. ---- Critique of Practical Reason, trans. with an intro. by Lewis White Beck, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956. ---- Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals: and What is Enlightenment? trans. with an intro. by Lewis White Beck, 2nd ed., rev., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997. ---- Lectures on Ethics, trans. by Peter Heath, ed. by Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. ---- Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. by Mary J. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. ---- Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings, trans. and ed. by Allen Wood and George di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. ---- Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770, trans. and ed. by Daivd Walford, in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992. ---- 李明輝 譯,《道德底形上學之基礎》,台北:聯經,1990。 ---- 李秋零、張榮 譯,李秋零主編,《康德著作全集》,第6卷, 北京:中國人民大學出版社,2007。 ---- 鄧曉芒 譯,《實踐理性批判》,北京:人民出版社,2003。 二、其它著作 英文部份 Anscombe, G. E. M. 'Modern Moral Philosophy', Philosophy, 33, 1958, pp. 1-19. Benton, Robert J. 'Political Expediency and Lying: Kant vs Benjamin Constant', Journal of the History of Ideas, 43, 1982, pp. 135-144. Bok, Sissela. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, Hassocks: Harverst Press, 1978. Cargile, James. 'The Universalisability of Lying', Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 43, 1965, pp. 229-231. Chisholm, Roderick M. and Thomas D. Feehan. 'The Intent to Deceive', The Journal of Philosophy, 74, 1977, pp. 143-159. Dean, Richard. 'What Should We Treat as an End In Itself', Pacific Philosophy Quarterly, 77, 1996, pp. 268-288. ---- The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. ---- 'Glasgow's Conception of Kantian Humanity', Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2008, pp. 307-314. Dietrichson, Paul. 'When is a Maxim Fully Universalizable?', Kant-Studien, 55, 1964, pp. 143-170. Glasgow, Johsua. 'Kant's Conception of Humanity', Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45, 2007, pp. 291-308. Guyer, Paul. 'The Possibility of the Categorical Imperative', The Philosophical Review, 104, 1995, pp. 353-385. ---- 'The Form and Matter of the Categorical Imperative', in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005, pp. 146-168. ---- Kant, New York: Routledge, 2006. Hill, Thomas E., Jr. 'Autonomy and Benevolent Lies', Journal of Value Inquiry, 18, 1984, pp. 251-268. ---- Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992 Hofmeister, Heimo E. M. 'The Ethical Problem of the Lie in Kant', Kant-Studien, 63, 1972a, pp. 262-267. ---- 'Truth and Truthfulness: A Reply to Dr. Schwarz', Ethics, 82, 1972b, pp. 262-267. Kagan, Shelly. Normative Ethics, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1998. Kerstein, Samuel J. Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. ---- 'Deriving the Formula of Universal Law', in Graham Bird ed. A Companion to Kant, Malden: Blackwell, 2006, pp. 308-321. Korsgaard, Christine M. 'Kant's Formula of Universal Law', Pacific Philosophy Quarterly, 66, 1985, pp. 24-47. ---- 'The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15, 1986, pp. 325-349. ---- Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 'Truthfulness and Lies: What Is the Problem and What Can We Learn from Kant?', in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 122-142. Mahon, James E. 'Kant on Lies, Candour and Reticence', Kantian Review, 7, 2003, pp. 102-133. ---- 'Kant and the Perfect Duty to Others Not to Lie', British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 14, 2006, pp. 653-685. O'Neill, Onora. 'Between Consenting Adults', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14, 1985, pp. 252-277. ---- 'Universal Laws and Ends-in-themselves', Monist, 72, 1989, pp. 341-361. Paton, H. J. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948. ---- 'An Alleged Right to Lie: A Problem in Kantian Ethics', Kant-Studien, 45, 1953, pp. 190-203. Pogge, Thomas W. 'The Categorical Imperative', in Paul Guyer ed. Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays, Lanham Md.: Roman & Littlefield, 1998, pp. 189-213. Rachels, James. 'Lying and the Ethics of Absolute Rules', in Can Ethics Provide Answers?: and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, Lanham Md.: Roman & Littlefield, 1997, pp. 125-143. ---- The Elements of Moral Philosophy, 4th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Schapiro, Tamar. 'Kantian Rigorism and Mitigating Circumstances', Ehics, 117, 2006, pp. 32-57. Schwarz, Wolfgang. 'Kant's Refutation of Charitable Lies', Ehics, 81, 1970, pp. 62-67. Sedgwick, Sally. 'On Lying and the Role of Content in Kant's Ethics', Kant-Studien, 82, 1991, pp. 42-62. Singer, Marcus G. 'The Categorical Imperative', The Philosophical Review, 63, 1954, pp. 577-591. Sullivan, Roger J. Immanuel Kant's moral theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. ---- An Introduction to Kant's Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Timmermann, Jens. 'The Dutiful Lie: Kantian Approaches to Moral Dilemmas', in Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklarung: Akten Des Ix. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 2001, pp. 345-354. ---- Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Vuillemin, Jules. 'On Lying: Kant and Benjamin Constant', Kant-Studien, 73, 1982, pp. 413-424. Wood, Allen W. 'Kant on False Promises', in Lewis White Beck ed. Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972, pp. 614-619. ---- 'Humanity as An End in Itself', in Paul Guyer ed. Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays, Lanham Md.: Roman & Littlefield, 1998, pp. 189-213. ---- Kant's Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. ---- Kant, Malden: Blackwell, 2005. ---- Kantian Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Zupančič, Alenka. Ethics of the real : Kant, Lacan, London: Verso, 2000. 中文部份 林火旺,《倫理學》,初版,台北:五南,1999。 孫效智,〈從倫理學行為理論談結果主義〉,《哲學雜誌》,第12期,1995,頁86-113。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42104 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文以康德〈論因慈善的動機而說謊的虛妄權利〉一文中的殺人兇手案例為焦點,旨在探討在康德倫理學的脈絡中,此時對兇手說謊的行為是否具有道德正當性,藉以評論康德倫理學稱為嚴格主義是否合理。
本文首先說明康德對說謊的定義,以及「不可說謊」座落於康德倫理學中何種義務類型之下。接著本文轉而討論定言令式的三條公式:普遍法原則、目的原則與目的王國原則,探討這三條公式是如何被運用來判斷說謊的道德性質。普遍法原則揭露出道德法則的形式;經過詮釋後,本文指出普遍法原則中的「普遍」二字必須經過適當的限縮,因而此原則允許在殺人案例的情況下對別人說謊。目的原則和目的王國原則顯示了道德所要保護的價值,本文指出在康德倫理學中,蘊涵了發展自身與促進整體和諧的人性概念是最需要受到保護的絕對價值;在這樣的理解下,本文試圖論證說謊並非總是傷害人性,進而主張此時說謊是道德上可允許的行為。 接著本文開始建構康德倫理學中道德判斷的機制,不同的理由可能形成互相衝突的道德法則,但實際上只有最具說服力的理由才足以成為道德法則的根據。回到殺人兇手的例子上,根據先前的討論,定言令式的三條公式都肯定此時說謊並不違反道德法則的要求。且在參照過康德不同的著作以後,可以發現康德倫理學確實承認說謊在某些情況下具有正當性,因此康德在〈論因慈善的動機而說謊的虛妄權利〉文中的主張並不正確。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis concentrates on the moral status of lying in Kantian ethics. In his article “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy”, Kant claims that lying is morally forbidden in any circumstance. However, taking Kantian ethics as a whole, I will argue that lying is sometimes morally permissible. Therefore, to describe Kantian ethics as “rigorism” is inadequate.
In Chapter 1, I will introduce Kant’s definition of lying, and the categories in which the duty of “Do not lie” is located. In Chapters 2 to 5, I will focus on the three formulae of the Categorical Imperative, FUL, FH and FRE, to discuss how these formulae are applied to evaluate the moral status of lying. In my interpretation, the concept of “universalization” in FUL should be reinterpreted to be the principle of consistency. Thus lying to the murderer can pass the test of FUL and is morally permissible. I will also argue that in FH and FRE the absolute value that Kantian ethics wants to protect is humanity, which implies the concept of self developing and of promoting the harmony of the unity. By this interpretation, lying to the murderer is also morally permissible, since lying in this case does not degrade humanity. In conclusion, I will claim that these three formulae, which are seen as the different aspects of the same Categorical Imperative, converge to the same position that acknowledges the moral permissibility of lying in murderer-at-the-door case. Examining the other writings of Kant, it can also be found that he acknowledges the moral legitimacy of lying in some situations. Therefore, Kant’s claim in “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy” is incoherent with his ethical theory. In Kantian ethics, at least in the murderer-at-the-door case, lying is a morally permissible action. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:46:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93124008-1.pdf: 2062617 bytes, checksum: b08dbbc3f6fdc2d909389ea9ec6b1f60 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 略語表 vii 導論 1 第一章 不可說謊的義務 9 第一節 康德的義務系統 9 第二節 康德倫理學中的說謊 15 第三節 康德的〈論說謊〉與本文的討論方向 21 第二章 可普遍化的行為格準 27 第一節 定言令式與假言令式 28 第二節 普遍法原則的論證與內容 31 第三節 邏輯上的矛盾或實踐上的矛盾? 36 第四節 從普遍法原則看說謊的正反論證 42 第五節 普遍法原則的瑕疵 51 第三章 人性自身即為目的 63 第一節 人性與目的自身 63 第二節 目的原則的論證與內容 71 第三節 從目的原則看說謊的正反論證 80 第四章 目的王國中的存有 95 第一節 自律原則與目的王國原則 96 第二節 定言令式-道德的最高原則 101 第五章 誠實方為上策? 107 第一節 道德判斷的形成方式 108 第二節 誠實方為上策? 113 結論 129 參考書目 137 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 誠實方為上策?—康德論說謊 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Is Honesty the Best Policy? - Kant on Lying | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張雪珠(Hsueh-Chu Chang),謝世民(Ser-Min Shei) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 說謊,定言令式,普遍化,目的自身,人性,目的王國, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | lying,Categorical Imperative,universalization,end-in-itself,humanity,realm of ends, | en |
dc.relation.page | 141 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-08-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 哲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。