請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42059完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李茂生 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pao-Yang Shen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 沈伯洋 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:44:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-08-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-08-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文（依筆畫順序）
1. Amartya Sen著，劉楚俊 譯，《經濟發展與自由》，先覺，2001。 2. John Rawls著，姚大志 譯，《正義新論》，左岸文化，2001。 3. Michel Foucault著，劉絮愷 譯，《臨床醫學的誕生》，時報文化，1994。 4. Nussbaum Martha，方佳俊譯，逃避人性－噁心、羞恥與法律，商周出版，2007。 5. Richard A. Posner著，高忠義譯，《性與理性(上)：性史與性理論》，台北：桂冠，2002。 6. 李茂生，〈論刑法修正草案第十條有關性交的定義〉，台灣本土法學雜誌第46期，2003.5。 7. Jennifer Harding 著，林秀麗 譯，《性與身體的解構》，韋伯文化，2000。 8. 林聰賢，〈論刑事訴訟之目的〉，中原財經法學，2004.6.30。 9. 黃富源，〈警政部門對婚姻暴力之防治現況與展望〉，發表於「婚姻暴力防治研討會」，台北市政府社會局主辦，1994年12月7、8日。 10. 湯靜蓮、蔡怡佳，《我痛！走出婚姻暴力的陰影》，台北：張老師，1997。 11. 王中吟，〈親密伴侶暴力中女性施暴者對施暴經驗與自我概念之詮釋〉，國立中正大學犯罪防治所碩士論文，2006。 12. 陳珈谷，〈論修復式司法〉，台灣大學法學院碩士論文，2002。 13. 勒內˙吉拉爾，馮壽農譯，《替罪羊》，臉譜，2004。 14. 鄭雅文，〈我國女性親密殺人犯罪之研究〉，國立中正大學犯罪防治所碩士論文，2005。 15. 張聖照，〈女性犯罪類與原因－－權力控制理論在台灣地區之實證研究〉，中央警察大學行政警察研究所，1994。 16. 林莉婷，〈女性白領犯罪之研究－以公司犯罪為例〉，國立台北大學犯罪學研究所，2003。 17. 葉碧翠，〈家庭內女性殺人犯罪之研究〉，國立台北大學犯罪學研究所，2003。 18. 鄔佩麗主持，性侵害被害人保護方案之初探研究（內政部委託計畫），國立台灣師範大學 英文（依字母順序） 1. Acoca, L.(1998). Outside/Inside: The violation of American girls at home, on the street, and in the juvenile justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 44(4), 561-589. 2. Acoca, L., & Austin, J. (1996). The hidden crisis: Women in prison. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency. 3. Adrien Katherine Wing (2003), Critical Race Feminism, New York University Press. 2nd Edition. 4. Amir, Menachem (1971). Patterns in forcible rape, Chicago : University of Chicago Press 73. 5. Alex R. Piquero & Stephen G. Tibbetts, Rational Choice and Criminal Behavior (2002). 6. Allan Johnson, Why Patriarchy? The Gender Knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy 51 (Temple University Press 1997). 7. Angela p. Harris, Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 581 (1990). 8. Ana Marie Cox et al. (Leslie Hetwood & Jennifer Drake eds., 1997). Masculinity Without Men: Women Reconciling Feminsim and Male-Identification, in THIRD WAVE AGENDA: BEING FEMINIST, DOING FEMENISM. 9. Arrigo, Bruce A. (1998). Social justice/criminal justice: the maturation of critical theory in law, crime, and deviance, Wadsworth Publishing Company. 10. Balogh, D. W., Kite, M. E., Pickel, K. L., Canel, D. & Schroeder, J. (2003). The effects of delayed report and motive for reporting on perceptions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 48. 11. Baron, L. S. & Straus, M.A. (1987). Four theories of rape: A macrosociological analysis. Social Problems, 34. 12. Baskin, D. R. & Sommers, I. B. (1998). Causalities of community disorder: Women’s careers in violence crime. Boulder, CO: Westview. 13. Beaton, Ann M., Francine Tougas, and Stephane Joly. (1996). 14. Bertrand, M. A. (1999). Incarceration as a gendering strategy. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 14(1), 47-59. 15. Blumstein, A., & Beck, A. J. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980-1996. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Prisons (pp. 17-61). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 16. Bottcher, J. (1993). Dimensions of gender and delinquent behavior: An analysis of qualitative data on incarcerated youths and their siblings in Greater Sacramento: Research Division, California Department of the Youth Authority. 17. Bottcher, J. (2001). Social practice of gender: How gender relates to delinquency in the everyday lives of high-risk youths. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39(4), 893-932. 18. Boyer, D., Chapman, L., & Marshell, B. (1993). Survival sex in King County: Helping women out (Report submitted to King County Women’s Advisory Board). Seattle, WA: Northwest Resource Associates. 19. Brett Stockdill, AIDS, Queers, and Criminal (In)Justice: Repressing Radical AIDS Activism, in Social justice/criminal justice: the maturation of critical theory in law, crime, and deviance. 20. Bui, H. N. (2004). In the adopted land: Abused immigrant women and the criminal justice system. Westport, CT: Praeger. 21. Bush, D. M. (1992). Women’s movements and state policy reform aimed at domestic violence against women: A comparison of the consequences of movement mobilization in the U.S. and India. Gender & Society, 6(4), 587-608. 22. Butler, S. (1982). Incest: Whose reality, whose theory? In B. R. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women, New York: Clark Boardman 325. 23. Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice system response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 24. Candib, L. M.(1999). Incest and other harms to daughters across cultures: Maternal complicity and patriarchal power. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(2), 185-201. 25. Carlen, P. (1998). Title sledgehammer: Women’s imprisonment at the millennium. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Macmillan. 26. Carol Smart (1976). Women, crime and criminology. 27. Carol Smart (1989). Feminism and the power of law, London; New York : Routledge. 28. Carrington, K. (1993). Offending girls: Sex, youth and justice. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin. 29. Catharine A. MacKinnon (1987). Difference and Dominance, in Feminism Unmodified. 30. Catherine Weiss and Louise Melling (1988). the legal education of twenty women, 40 Stan. L. Rev. 1299. 31. Chesler, Phyllis (1978). About men, New York : Simon and Schuster. 32. Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest polices for girls and women. 33. Chesney-Lind, Meda.(2004), The female offender : girls, women, and crime Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, c1997. 34. Collins, M. (1992). The gay-bashers. In G. M. Herek & K. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 35. Comack, E. (1993). Producing feminist knowledge: Lessons from women in trouble. Theoretical Criminology, 3(3), 287-306. 36. Cornell D. (1992). Beyond Accommodation, London: Routledge. 37. Cowie, J., Cowie, V., & Slater, E. (1968). Delinquency in girls. London: Geineman. 38. Crawford, C (2000). Gender, race, and habitual offender sentencing in Florida. Criminology, 38(1), 263-280. 39. Crimp, Douglas (1980). AIDS demo graphics, Seattle, WA : Bay Press. 40. Cynthia Grant Bowman and Elizabeth M. Schneider. (1998). Feminist legal theory, feminist lawmaking, and the legal profession, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 249. 41. David Garland (1999). Criminology amd Social Theory. OXFORD. 42. Davis, A. Y. (1978). Rape, racism and the capitalist setting. Black Scholar, 9(7), 24-30. 43. Dawn E. Johnsen (1986). NOTE, THE CREATION OF FETAL RIGHTS: CONFLICTS WITH WOMEN’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO LIBERTY, PRIVACY, AND EQUAL PROTECTON, 95 Yale L.J. 599. 44. Deborah L. Rhode and Carol Sanger, Gender and Rights, Ashgate, 2005. 45. Dobash & Dobash (1992). Women, violence, and social change. 46. Dobash, R.E., R.P. Dobash and S. Gutteridge (1986). The Imprisonment of Women. New York: Routledge. 47. Duchesne, D. (1997). Street prostitution in Canada (Juristat Service Bulletin 17, No. 2). Ottawa Canadian Center of Justice Statistics. 48. Du Mont, J., & Myhr, T.L. (2000). So few convictions: The role of client-reoated characteristics in the legal processing of sexual assaults. Violence Against Women, 6, 1109-1136. 49. Diane Elam (1994). “FEMINISM AND DECONSTRUCTION”, New York/London: Routledge. 50. Drucilla Cornell (1991). Beyond Accomodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction, and the Law. New York: Routledge. 51. Elizabeth Carolyn Miller (2003). The New Woman Criminal: Crime Fiction, Gender and British Culture at the Turn of Century, University of Wisconsin. 52. Engels, F. (1972). The origin of the family, private property and the state. NY: International publishers. 53. Enos, V. P.(1996). Prosecuting battered mothers: State laws’ failure to protect battered women and abused children. Harvard women’s Law Journal, 19, 229-268. 54. Erez, E., & King, T. (2000). Patriarchal terrorism or common couple violence: Attorneys' views of prosecuting and defending woman batterers. International Review of Victimology, 7(1-3), 207-226. 55. Erickson, P. G., Butters, J., McGillicuddy, P., & Hallgren, A.(2000). Crack and prostitution: Gender, myths, and experiences. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(4), 767-788. 56. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, The Epistemology of the Closet (New York, 1989). 57. Farganis, Sandra. 1994. 'Postmodernism and Feminism,' in Postmodernism and Social Inquiry, D. Dickens and A. Faontana (eds). New York: Guilford Press, pp. 101-126. 58. Farley, M., Baral, I., Kiremire, M. & Sezgin, U.(1998). Prostitution in five countries: Violence and post-traumatic street disorder. Feminism and Psychology, 8(4), 405-426. 59. Fegan,E.V., Fathers (1996). fetuses and abortion decision-making: The reproduction of maternal ideology in Canadian judicial discourse. Social & Legal Studies, 5, 75-93. 60. Ferraro, K. J., & Moe, A. M. (2003). Mothering, crime, and incarceration. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(1), 9-40. 61. Ferree M. M. & Hess,B. B. (1995). Controversy and coalition. New York: Routledge. 62. Figueira-McDonough, J.(1985). Gender differences in informal processing: A look at charge bargaining and sentence reduction in Washington, D.C. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(2), 101-133. 63. Flavin, J. (2001). Of punishment and parenthood: Family-based social control and the sentencing of black drug offenders. Gender & Society, 15(4), 611-633. 64. Frances Heidensohn (2006). Gender and Justice: New Concepts and Approaches. Willan Publishing. 65. Freedman, E. B. (1987). “Uncontrolled desires”: The response to the sexual psychopath, 1920-1960. Journal of American History, 74(1), 83-106. 66. Freud (1996). “Civilized” sexual morality and modern nervous illness, Civilization, society and religion. 67. Foucault, Michel (1977). Discipline and punish : the birth of the prison, New York : Pantheon Books. 68. Gelsthorpe, L. (1992). Social inquiry reports: Race and gender considerations. Research Bulletin, 32, 17-22. 69. Gert Biesta (1994). THE IDENTITY OF THE BODY, in Philosophy of Education. 70. Gibbons, D. C. (1970). Delinquency Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 71. Giorgio, G. (2002). Speaking silence: Definitional dialogues in abusive lesbian research. Violence Against Women. 8, 1233-1259. 72. Gillian, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 73. Girshick, L. B. (2002a). No sugar, no spice: Reflection on woman-to-woman sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 1500-1530. 74. Greenberg, D.F., & West, V. (2001). State prison populations and their growth, 1971-1991. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39, 615-654. 75. Gregory M. Matoesian (2001). Law and the language of identity, Oxford. 76. Gross, K., & Aday, S. (2003). The scary world in your living room and neighborhood: Local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communications, 53, 411-426. 77. Hagedorn, J., M., & Dovitt, M. L. (1999). Fighting female: The social construction of female gangs. In J. Hagedorn (Ed.), Female gangs in America (pp. 256-276). Chicago: Lake View Press. 78. Hal R. Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics-a modern approach, sixth edition, Ch.30. 79. Hamby, S. L. (2000). The importance of community in a feminist analysis of domestic violence among American Indians. American Journal of Community Psychology,28(5), 649-669. 80. Hannah-Moffat, K., & Shaw, M. (Eds.). (2000). An ideal prison? Critical essays on women’s imprisonment in Canada. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood. 81. Heather, D. (2000). The influence of presentence reports on sentencing in a district court in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 33(1), 91-106. 82. Heimer, K., Unal, H., & DeCoster , S.(2000). Opening the black box: The social psychology of gender and delinquency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Toronto. 83. Heise, L. L., Pitanguy, J., & Germain, A.(1994).Violence against women: The hidden health burden. Washington, DC: World bank. 84. Hofman-Bustamante (1973). The nature of female criminality. Criminology 8(2) 117-136. 85. Holtfreter, K. & Morash, M. (2001). Criminogenic needs among women offenders and implications for correctional programming. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Washington, DC. 86. Hughes D. M., The “Natasha” trade: The transnational sex trafficking, in National Justice of Journal. 87. Janet Saltzman Chafetz (1999). Handbook of the Sociology of gender, University of Houston, Houston, Texas. 88. Jenness, V., & Board, K. (1997). Hate crimes: New social movements and the politics of violence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 89. Jennifer L. Dunn (2002). Courting Disaster: Intimate Stalking, Culture, and Criminal Justice, New York : Aldine de Gruyter. 90. Joyce Gelb (1989). Feminism and Politics: A Comparative Perspective, Berkeley • Los Angeles • Oxford. 91. J. Butler (c2006). Gender trouble : feminism and the subversion of identity, New York : Routledge. 92. J Butler (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. Fordham Univ Press. 93. J Flax, Jane (1993). Disputed Subjects. New York: Routledge. 94. Kane, S. (1999) Through a window darkly, Men who sell sex to men in India and Bangladesh, In P. Aggleton (Ed.), Men who sell sex: International perspectives on male prostitution and AIDS (pp. 195-212). London: UCL Press. 95. Kane, R. (2000). Police responses to restraining orders in domestic violence incidents: Identifying the custody-threshold thesis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(5), 561-580. 96. Kanuha, Y. (1996). Domestic violence, racism, and the battered women’s movement in the United States. In J. L. Edleson & Z. C. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 34-50). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. 97. Karen Knop, (2004). Gender and Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press. 98. Kathleen Daly (1989). Criminal Justice Ideologies and Practices in Different Voices: Some Feminist Questions about Justice, 17 Int. J. Soc L. 1. 99. Kenworthy, T. (1999, Nov. 3). Jury to weigh motives in gay killing. Washington Post, A3. 100. Kerstern, J. (1990). A gender specific look at patterns of violence in juvenile institutions: Or are girls really “more difficult to handle”? International Journal of Sociology of the Law, 18, 473-493. 101. Klein, D. (1982). The dark side of marriage: Battered wives and the domination of women. In N. H. Rafter & E.A. Stanko (Eds.), Judge, lawyer, victim, thief: Women, gender roles and criminal justice (pp. 83-110). Boston: Northeastern University Press. 102. Klien, D. (1973) The etiology of female crime: A review of the literature, Crime and Social Justice: Issues in Criminology vol.8, 3-30. 103. Kimberle Williams Crenshaw (2003). Demarginalizing the intersecton of race and sex, in Critical Race Feminism 23, 23-31 (Adrien Katherine Wing ed., New York university Press, 2003). 104. Konopka, G. (1966). The adolescent girl in conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 105. Kristina Sheryl Wong (2003), Pranks and Fake Porn: Doing Feminism My Way, in Catching a wave: reclaiming feminism for the 21st century 294, 297 (Rory Dicker & Alison Piepmeier eds., Northeasten University Press, 2003). 106. Kurz, D. (1987). Emergency department responses to battered women: Resistance to medicalization. Social Problem, 34(1), 69-81. 107. Lahm, K. F. (2000). Equal or equitable: An exploration of educational and vocational program availability for male and female offenders. Federal Probation, 64(2), 39-46. 108. Laider,K & Hunt,G (2001) Accomplishing Femininity Among the Girls in the Gang, British Journal of Criminology, vol 41, page 656-678. 109. Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb(Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108-138). New York: New York University. 110. Lani Guinier (1994). Michelle Fine, and Jane Balin, with Ann Bartow, and Deborah Lee Stachel, Becoming Gentlemen: women’s experiences at one IVY league law school, 143 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1, 82 111. Leidholt, D. (1991). Prostitution: A violation of women’s human rights. Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 1,133-147. 112. Li, J., & Lavely, W. (2003). Village context, women’s status, and son preference among rural Chinese women. Rural Sociology, 68(1), 87-106. 113. Linda Gordon (1976). Woman’s body, woman’s right: Birth Control in America 397-400 (rev. ed. 1990; orig. pub. 1976). 114. Lombroso, Cesare, Criminal woman, the prostitute, and the normal woman Durham : Duke University Press, 2004. 115. Lorraine Nencel (2001). Ethnography and Prostitution in Peru. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. 116. Lupton, Deborah (1995). The imperative of health : public health and the regulated body, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications, p.5-79. 117. Jones, L., & Finkelhor, D. (2001). The Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 118. Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 947-958. 119. Maher, L. (1997). Sexed work : Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. New York: Oxford University Press. 120. Mandaraka-Sheppard, A. (1986). The dynamics of aggression in women’s prisons in England and Wales. London: Gower. 121. Martin, P. Y. & Powell, M. (1995). Accounting for the “second assault”: Legal organizations’ framing of rape victims. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853-890. 122. Mary Becker (2001). Cynthia Grant Bowman & Morrison Torrey, Feminist Jurisprudence: taking women seriously. 123. Mayer, J. (1994). Girls in the Maryland juvenile justice system: Findings of the Female Population Taskforce. Presentation to the Gender Specific Service Training Group, Minneapolis, MN. 124. Merry Morash, (2006). Understanding Gender, Crime, and Justice. Sage Publications, Inc. 125. Merry, S. (1995). Wife battering and the ambiguities of rights. In A. Sarat & T. Kearns (Eds.), Identities, politics, and rights (pp. 271-307). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 126. Messerschmidt, J. W. (1986). Capitalism, patriarchy, and crime: Toward a socialist feminist criminology. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. 127. Michel Foucault, the history of sexuality (Robert Hurley trans., 1990). 128. Miller, J. (1995). Gender and power on streets: Street prostitution in the era of crack cocaine. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 427-452. 129. Minow, Martha (1990). MAKING ALL THE DIFFERENCE: INCLUSION, EXCLUSION, AND AMERICAN LAW. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 130. Morash, M. & Schram, P. J. (2002). The prison experience: Special issue of women in prison. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland. 131. Morrison Torrey (1991). When will we be believed? Rape Myths and the idea of a fair trial in rape prosecutions, 24 U.C.Davis L.Rev. 1013. 132. Morse, E. V., Simon, P. M., & Burchfiel, K. E. (1999). Social environment and male sex work in the United States. In P. Aggleton (Ed.), Men who sell sex: International perspective on male prostitution and AIDS(pp. 83-101). London:UCL Press. 133. Naffine, N. (1987). Female Crime: The construction of women in criminology, Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin. 134. Nancy Hartsock(1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays, Boulder, Colo. : Westview Press. 135. Naples, N. A. (2003). Deconstructing and locating survivor discourse: Dynamics of narrative, empowerment, and resistance for survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), 1151-1185. 136. Nearpass, G. R. (2003). Comment: The overlooked constitutional objection and practical concerns to penalty-enhancement provisions of hate crime legislation. Albany Law Review, 66, 547-572. 137. Neil m. Malamuth, The confluence model of sexual aggression: feminist and evolutionary perspectives, in Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives 269 (David M. Buss and Neil M. Malamuth eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 1996). 138. Neil S. Jacobson and John M. Gottman (1998). When men batter women: new insights into ending abusive relationship. 139. Nussbaum (2006). Frontiers of Justice: disability, nationality, species membership, in Harvard University Press. 140. Nussbaum (2000). Women and Human Development: the capabilities approach, New York : Cambridge University Press. 141. Patricia A Cain(1989). Feminist Jurisprudence: Grounding the theories, 4 Berkley Women’s L.J. 191. 142. Pogrebin, M. R., & Dodge, M. (2001). Women’s accounts of their prison experiences: A retrospective view of their subjective realities, in 29 Journal of Criminal Justice 531-541. 143. Pollack, S.(2000) Dependency Discourse as social control. In K. Hannah-Moffat & M. Shaw (Eds.), The ideal prison? Critical Essays on women’s imprisonment in Canada p.72-81. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood. 144. Poupart L. M., Social Justice, in 29(1/2) Social justice, 144-159. 145. Preisser, A. B. (1999). Domestic violence in South Asian communities in America: Advocacy and intervention. Violence Against Women, 5, 684-699. 146. P. Y. Martin Powell, Accounting for the 'Second Assault': Legal Organizations' Framing of Rape Victims, Law and Social Inquiry Volume:19 Issue:4 Dated:(Fall 1994) p.:853- 890. 147. Rachel Simmons,(2002). Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls, Orlando, Fla. : Harcourt. 148. Ratnapala, N. (1999). Male sex work in Sri Lanka. In P. Aggleton (Ed.), Men who sell sex: International perspectives on male prostitution and AIDS (pp. 213-221). London: UCL Press. 149. R. Campbell & Ahrens (1998). Preventing the 'Second Rape': Rape Survivors' Experiences With Community Service.... 150. R. Campbell, Rebecca. Sharon M. Wasco, Courtney E. Ahrens, Tracy Sefl, & Holly E. Barnes. (2001). “Preventing the ‘second rape’: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 16 (December):1239-1259. 151. Roiphe, K. (1993 June 13). Rape hype betrays feminism: Date rape’s other victim. New York Times Magazine. pp. 26-30, 40, 68. 152. Rosalind Pollack Petchesky (1984). Abortion and woman’s choice: the state, sexuality, & reproductive freedom 178-182 (rev. ed. 1990; orig. pub. 1984). 153. Rosenau, P. (1992). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 154. Richard A Shweder, (2000). What About Female Genital Mutilation? And Why Understanding Culture Matters in the First Place, 129 DEADALUS 209. 155. Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women. New York: Routledge. 156. Ristock, J. L. (2003). Exploring dynamics of abusive lesbian relationships: Preliminary analysis of a multisite, qualitative study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(3/4), 329-341. 157. Robin L. West, the difference in women’s hedonic lives: a phenomenological critique of feminist legal theory, 3 Wis. Women’s L.J. 81 (1987). 158. Roh, Jongho, and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2003. “All Politics is Not Local: National Forces in State Abortion Initiatives.” Social Science Quarterly 84(1):15-31 159. Rosalind Pollack Petchesky, Abortion and woman’s choice: the state, sexuality, & reproductive freedom 178-182 (rev. ed. 1990; orig. pub. 1984). 160. Sachs, A. and Wilson, J. (1978). Sexism and the Law. Oxford: Martin Robertson. 161. Sanday, P. R. (1996). A women scorned: Acquaintance rape on trial. New York: Doubleday. 162. Schneider, E. M. (2000). Battered women and the laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 163. Schmitt, F. E. & Martin, P.Y. (1999). Unobtrusive mobilization by aninstitutionalized rape crisis center: “All we do comes from victims.” Gender & Society, 13(3), 364-384. 164. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 165. Shaw, M. (1999). Is there a feminist future for women’s prisons? In R. Matthews & P. Francis Prisons 2000 (pp. 178-200). London: Macmillan. 166. Sheryl L. Howell, How will Battered Women Fare Under the New Welfare Reform? 12 BERKLEY WOMEN’s L.J. 167. Smart, C. (1995). Law, crime and sexuality: Essays in feminism. London: Sage. 168. Steffensmerier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446. 169. Simkins, S., & Kaz, S. (2002). Criminalizing abused girls. Violence Against Women, 8,1474-1499. 170. Simpson, A. R. (2001). Raising teens: A synthesis of research and a foundation for action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, Center for Health Communication. 171. Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice.” Social Problems, 48(2), 206-236. 172. Stone, A. E., & Fialk, R. J. (1997). Criminalizing the exposure of children to family violence: Breaking the cycle of abuse. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 20, 205-227. 173. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., Struckman-Johnson, D. L., Rucker, L., Bumby, K., & Donaldson, S. (1996). Sexual coercion reported by men and women in prison. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 67-76. 174. Sudbury, J. (2002). Celling black bodies: Black women in the global prison industrial complex. Feminist Review, 70, 57-74. 175. Susan Estrich(1986). Rape, 95 Yale L.J. 1087. 176. Temkin, J. (1997) Plus a change: reporting rape in the 1990s’, British Journal of Criminology, 37, 507. 177. Martin, Susan Ehrlich (1996). Doing Justice, Doing Gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 178. Tierney, K. (1982). The Battered Women Movement and the Creation of the Wife Beating Problem, in 29(3) Social Problems 207-220. 179. Tuesday, V. J. (1998). Girls in jail. Women & Therapy, 21(1), 127-139. 180. Vogt, I. (1998). Gender and drug treatment systems. In H. Klingemann & G. Hunt (Eds.), Drug treatment systems in an international perspective: Drugs, demons, and delinquents (pp. 281-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 181. Weldon, S. L. (2002). Protest, policy, and the problem of violence against women: A cross-national comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. 182. Weissman, D. M. (2001). Gender-based violence as judicial anomaly: Between “the truly national and the truly local”. Boston College Law Review, 42, 1081-1159. 183. Weston-Henriques, Z., & Jones-Brown, D. D. (2000). Prisons as “safe havens” for African-American women. In M.W. Markowitz & D.D. Jones-Brown(Eds.), The system in black and white: Exploring the connections between race, crime and justice (pp. 267-273). Westport, CT: Praeger. 184. Wilkie, M. (1993). Sentencing women: Pre-sentence reports and constructions of female offenders. Nedland: University of Western Australia Crime Research Center. 185. Young, Iris Marion (1990). 'The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference' in Feminism/Postmodernism, Nicholson, Linda J. (Ed). New York: Routledge. 186. Zion, J., & Zion, E. B., “Hazho’ Sokee”-Stay together nicely: Domestic violence under Navajo common law, in M. O. Nielsen & R. A. Silverman (Eds), Native Americans, Crime and Justice 96-113. Boulder, CO: Westview. 187. Zygmunt Bauman, Social uses of Law and Order, in Criminology and Scial Theory 23,(David Garland ed., Oxford university Press, 2000). 188. Zygmunt Bauman (1993). Postmodern Ethics. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42059 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 第一章是引言。
第二章是現實生活概況，前半段介紹犯罪中女性的現況，後半段是法律上目前對這些犯罪的處遇，多為數據和統計資料。由於並非重點，故篇幅較短。 第三章介紹和犯罪中女性相關的社會運動和學說，前半段的社會運動是指較偏重一般人民的運動，而後半段的學說就是學者的各種解釋，至於後現代的學說，也一併在這章介紹。 第四章是要破除前述兩章，也就是說，無論是「現實生活（社會現況）」，或者「社會運動」，或者「學說解釋」，都只是傳達知識而已，因此這一章前半段主要是在整理這些知識如何形成，然後後半段再說這些知識如何被女性「吸收」（自律）。 第五章是個人與法律在知識下的選擇，前半段是處理，作為一個個體，在前述第四章這樣的「知識爆炸」時代，要怎麼選擇「成為一個個體」，然後此章的後半段，也是論文的核心，討論法律在這樣的環境之下，該如何做制訂與適用，在這邊本文利用刑法「法益」「罪責」的概念作區分，在法益層面，希望立法者排除某些特定因素不要進入法律，並提出相關法律的立法建議；再者，就罪責層面，以執法者（法官）的角度，希望某些東西積極進入法律。因此，法益和罪責的連鎖概念，將是本章的核心。 第六章是小結，將Nussbaum新提出的轉型能力取徑的正義概念介紹，並指出新的正義概念。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:44:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93a21060-1.pdf: 1036165 bytes, checksum: a56801101e6a2c206ef7727026ff7bb7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 序論 1
第一節 問題意識 1 第二節 研究方法 2 第三節 論文架構與格式 3 第二章 犯罪中女性之現況與刑事處遇 5 第一節 犯罪中女性之現況 5 第一項 女性作為被害人 5 一、家庭暴力 5 二、強制性交、強制猥褻、性騷擾、跟蹤 6 三、性手術 8 四、針對女性的憎恨式犯罪 8 第二項 女性作為加害人 8 一、虐待伴侶或幼童 9 二、墮胎 10 三、性產業相關工作 11 第三項 女性作為加害人抑或被害人 13 一、兩種解釋可能 13 二、亂倫 15 第二節 刑事程序上之處遇 16 第一項 對於被害人之處遇 16 一、家暴 16 二、強制性交等犯罪 18 三、性手術 20 四、憎恨式犯罪 21 第二項 對於加害人之處遇 21 一、定罪層面的處遇 21 二、量刑層面的處遇 23 三、監獄處遇程序 26 四、對非行者之處遇 28 第三項 加害人和被害人的混合處遇：修復性司法 30 一、理論成型 31 A. John Braithwaite的明恥理論 32 B. ADR理論（Alternative Dispute Resolution） 32 二、實際運作 33 第三章 女性犯罪之社會運動及學說發展 36 第一節 社會運動的開展 36 第一項 女性運動思潮 36 一、第一波及第二波女性主義 36 二、馬克斯女性主義及社會學女性主義 37 三、第三波女性主義 40 第二項 針對女性被害人及加害人之運動 42 一、女性被害人方面之社會運動 42 A. 法律層面 42 B. 法律外層面 44 C. 配合與反對 46 二、女性加害人方面之社會運動 48 A. FAMM 48 B. 人權團體之運動 49 C. 加害人本身的運動 52 第二節 女性主義犯罪學之發展 53 第一項 近代學說 54 一、女性被害人之學說釋義 54 A. 生理、心理研究 54 B. 經濟理論（Economic and educational resources theory） 55 C. 社會文化研究 57 D. 整合性研究 59 E. 密不可分的兩個面向 61 二、女性加害人之學說釋義 66 A. 生理、心理研究 66 B. 經濟研究（Economic Marginalization） 67 C. 社會文化研究 69 D. 整合性研究 71 E. 和被害人研究的差異 75 第二項 後現代理論 77 一、語言的使用和形成 79 二、知識的進展 82 三、酷兒理論 86 四、偶然的結果的重要性 87 第三項 其他領域之發展 89 一、種族主義 89 二、全球化 90 三、媒體和文化 91 A. 媒體 91 B. 文化 93 第四章 成為女性的過程─知識和自律 94 第一節 環境下的知識傳達 94 第一項 法律和相關處遇 94 一、法律的知識形成 94 二、定罪層面的知識形成 97 A. 警察 97 B. 檢察官 98 C. 律師 99 D. 法官 100 三、量刑和監禁層面的知識形成 102 四、修復性司法的知識形成 106 第二項 醫學的進展 107 一、醫學和風險的概念之知識進展 108 二、醫學的治療 111 第三項 社會運動以及相關學說 114 一、女性被害人的相關知識進展 114 二、女性加害人的相關知識進展 116 三、知識的交互矛盾 120 第四項 小結：女性主體的形塑 121 第二節 社會中消費過程之個體自律 127 第一項 被害人的自律過程 128 一、社會中的自律過程 128 A. 文化 129 B. 社會團體或學者 131 二、刑事程序中的自律過程 133 三、女性的新自覺 137 第二項 加害人的自律過程 139 一、自我選擇並宣示主體性 139 二、賦予選擇可能之後的再度自律 141 三、性別錯置 144 第三項 集體自律過程：跳不出的無限回圈 145 一、女性主義學者知識的他用 146 二、女性主義學者知識的自用 148 三、社會語言和自律的結合與脫勾可能 151 第五章 個人選擇與法律之價值抉擇─從法益和罪責出發 153 第一節 個人層面的選擇 153 第一項 去陽化或去陰化 153 第二項 女性的選擇 155 第三項 無法選擇？ 156 第四項 無可奈何下的選擇：半選擇 159 第二節 法律層面的選擇 163 第一項 法律的力量 163 一、概說 163 二、知識化下的法律選擇之不可能 165 第二項 不可進入法律：法益層面的立法者選擇 168 一、排除羞恥？ 168 A. 羞恥的概念 168 B. 立法的選擇可能 170 C. 小結 173 二、性別概念的排除 176 三、當前法律之修正建議 179 A. 女性作為被害者之強制性交、強制猥褻、性騷擾等 179 B. 女性作為加害者之性產業相關工作等 182 第三項 可以進入法律：罪責層面的執法者選擇 184 一、他為可能性 184 二、個人選擇的回歸：法律的重新解釋 188 第六章 法律人的義務─代結論 190 第一節 法律公平正義的清單 190 第一項 John Rawls的正義觀 190 第二項 Nussbaum的正義觀 192 第三項 小結 195 第二節 法律和個人選擇的整合：作為法律人之義務 196 參考書目 198 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 罪責 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 女性主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 加害 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 被害 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 主體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 法益 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | offender | en |
| dc.subject | victim | en |
| dc.subject | subjectivity | en |
| dc.subject | criminal law | en |
| dc.subject | feminism | en |
| dc.title | 犯罪中女性主體的形塑－個人與法律選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Woman, Subjectivity, and Criminal Law | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉靜怡,周素嫻 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 女性主義,加害,被害,主體,法益,罪責, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | feminism,criminal law,offender,subjectivity,victim, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 211 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-08-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。