請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42027
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林珊如(Shan-Ju Lin Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chih Ko | en |
dc.contributor.author | 柯寓芝 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:42:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-09-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-09-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-09-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abrams, D., Baecker, R., & Chignell, M. (1998). Information archiving with bookmarks: Personal web space construction and organization. Proceedings of CHI’98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 41-48.
Barreau, D. K. (1995). Context as a factor in personal information management systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(5), 327-339. Barreau, D. K., & Nardi, B. (1995). Finding and reminding: File organization form the desktop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 27(3), 39-43. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I. & Neuwirth, C. (2002). Innovation in extremis: Evolving an application for the critical work of email and information management. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 181-192. Bergman, O., Beyth-Marom, R., & Nachmias, R. (2003). The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(9), 872-878. Boardman, R., & Sasse, M. A. (2004). Stuff goes into the computer and doesn't come out: A cross-tool study of personal information management. Proceedings of the CHI’04 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 583-590. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge:Harvard University Press. Bruce, H., Jones, W., & Dumais, S. (2004). Information behaviour that keeps found things found. Information Research, 10(1). Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://InformationR.net/ir/10-1/paper207.html Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101-108. Capra, R., & Pérez-Quiñones, M. (2006, August). Factors and evaluation of refinding behaviors. Paper presented at the SIGIR 2006 Workshop on Personal Information Management. Seattle, WA. Carroll, J. M. (1982). Creative names for personal files in an interactive computing environment. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 16, 405-438. Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. J. (2001). 3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, WA, USA. Cole, C. (2000). Name collection by Ph.D. history students: Inducing expertise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), 444-455. Cole, I. (1982). Human aspects of office filing: Implications for the electronic office. In R. E. Edwards (Ed.), Proceedings of Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting (pp. 59-63). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. Cooney, S. (1979). A standard procedure for generating personal classifications and indexes. Journal of Information Science, 2(2), 81-90. Dourish, P., Edwards, W. K., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K., Salisbury, M., Terry, D., & Thornton, J. (2000). Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(2), 140-170. Dumais, S., Cutrell, E., Cadiz, J. J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R., & Robbins, D. C. (2003). Stuff I've seen: A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 72-79. Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: A conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context: Proceedings of international conference research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts (pp. 412-421). London: Taylor Graham. Fidzani, B.T. (1998). Information needs and information-seeking behavior of graduate students at the University of Botswana. Library Review, 47(7), 329-340. Genoni, P., & Partridge, J. (2000). Personal research information management information literacy and the research student. In C. Bruce & P. Candy (Eds.), Information literacy around the world: Advances in programs and research (pp. 223-236). Wagga Wagga, New South Wales: Centre for Information Studies. George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E.C., St. Clair, G., & Stein, J. (2006). Scholarly use of information: Graduate students' information seeking behaviour. Information Research, 11(4). Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html Gonçalves, D. J., & Jorge, J. A. (2003, June). An Empirical Study of Personal Document Spaces. Proceedings of DSV-IS 2003, 46-60. Groth, K., & Eklundh, K. S. (2006, August). Combining personal and organisational information. Paper presented at the SIGIR 2006 Workshop on Personal Information Management. Seattle, WA. Gwizdka, J. (2004). Email task management styles: The cleaners and the keepers. In Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on human factors and computing systems (pp. 1235--1238). ACM Press. Gwizdka, J. (2006, August). Finding to keep and organize: Personal information collections as context. Paper presented at the SIGIR 2006 Workshop on Personal Information Management. Seattle, WA. Jahoda, G., Hutchins, R. D., & Galford, R. R. (1966). Characteristics and use of personal indexes maintained by scientists and engineers in one university. American Documentation, 17(2), 71-75. Jamali, H. R., & Nicholas, D. (2006, November). Communication and information-seeking behaviour of research students in physics and astronomy. Paper presented at 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, TX. Jones, W. (2004, March). Finders, keepers? First Monday, 9(3). Retrieved March 14, 2005, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_3/jones/index.html Jones, W. (2007). Personal information management. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 41, 453-504. Jones, W., Bruce, H., Foxley, A., & Munat, C. (2006). Planning personal projects and organizing personal information. Paper presented at 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, TX. Kaptelinin, V. (1996, April). Creating computer-based work environments: An empirical study of Macintosh users. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference. Kaptelinin, V., & Czerwinski, M. (Eds.). (2007). Beyond the desktop metaphor: Designing integrated digital work environments. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. Kwasnik, B. H. (1989). The influence of context on classificatory behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick. Kwasnik, B. H., & Jorgensen, C. (1992). The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names for office documents. In N. J. Williamson & M. Hudon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Study Conference on Classification Research (pp. 273-283). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers. Lansdale, M. (1988). The psychology of personal information management. Applied Ergonomics, 19(1), 55-66. Mackenzie, M. L. (2000, November). The classification, storage and retrieval of electronic mail. Proceedings of the 63rd ASIS&T Annual Conference. Chicago, IL. Malone, T. W. (1983). How do people organize their desks: Implications for the design of office information-systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(1), 99–112. Moran, T. P., & Zhai, S. (2007). Beyond the desktop metaphor in seven dimensions. In V. Kaptelinin & M. Czerwinski (Eds.), Beyond the desktop metaphor: Designing integrated digital work environments (pp. 335-354). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. Pavasio, P., Schär, S. G., & Krueger, H. (2004). In pursuit of desktop evolution: User problems and practices with modern desktop systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(2), 156-160. Robbins, S. P.(2001)。組織行為學(Organizational Behavior)(第二版)(李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯)。台北市:華泰。(原著2001年出版) Ross, C. S. (1999). Finding without seeking: The information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing & Management, 35(6),783-799. Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of 'way of life. Library & Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-94 Sipe, S. E. (1999). Print directory trees from explorer. Retrieved April 20, 2005, from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,94767,00.asp Soper, M. E. (1976). Characteristics and use of personal collections. Library Quarterly, 46(4), 397-415. Spurgin, K. M. (2006, August). The sense-making approach and the study of personal information management. Paper presented at the SIGIR 2006 Workshop on Personal Information Management. Seattle, WA. Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds). Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 217-255). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Wanat, C. (1985). Management strategies for personal files: the Berkeley Seminar. Special Libraries, 76(4), 253-260. Whittaker, S., & Hirschberg, J. (2001). The character, value, and management of personal paper archives. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(2), 150–170. Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1996). Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proceedings of CHI’96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 495-502. Wilson, P. (2001). 20 years in the life of a long-term empirical personal electronic filing study. Behavior & Information Technology, 20(5), 395-409. Wilson, T. (1997). Information behaviour: An interdisciplinary perspective. In. P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds), Information seeking in context: Proceedings of international conference research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts (pp. 39-50). London, UK: Taylor Graham. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56. 卜小蝶、林致傑(民93)。網路資訊保存方法初探:以大學校園網路使用者為例。圖書與資訊學刊,50,20-31。 巴頓(Patton, M. Q.)(民84)。質的評鑑與研究(Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods)(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。台北縣:桂冠。(原著1990年出版) 李郁雅(民89)。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為例。未出版之碩士論文,台北市,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。 張春興(民80)。現代心理學。台北市:東華書局。 張清溪、吳聰敏、劉鶯釧、許嘉棟(1995)。經濟學:理論與實際(第三版)。台北市:翰蘆。 鄭昭明(1982)。人類的圖形辨識。科學月刊,13(10),14-15。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42027 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究之目的是瞭解研究生在「學位論文研究」之情境下,如何管理個人的電子式論文研究資料,以促進日後的再利用。據此研究目的所提出之三大研究問題包括:(1)研究生如何管理論文相關電子資料?(2)「學位論文研究」情境之影響?(3)研究生對「論文相關電子資料管理」之態度為何?
為解答所提出之研究問題,並且回應研究目的,研究者規劃了兩個研究階段:在研究階段一採用質性取向之訪談、輔助性觀察以蒐集實徵研究資料,深入探討論文資料管理行為,訪談對象共有12位,分別為5位博士(生)及7位碩士(生),皆來自不同的學科領域;在研究階段二則採用網路問卷以擴大瞭解研究生對論文資料之管理經驗,並彌補訪談資料之缺口,總計回收214份有效問卷,填答者有四成來自科學領域,三成來自社會領域,二成來自人文領域,且幾乎都是平日有上網習慣之碩士生。 綜合質量並行之研究結果,本研究的重要發現與結論如下: 在「論文資料管理行為」方面,研究生為了管理論文相關電子資料所進行之活動共有22種,這些活動分別表現出保存、組織、已知資訊搜尋及後設管理等四種特徵。研究生管理論文資料時,可能遭遇保存問題、組織問題、已知資訊搜尋問題及載體與工具問題等四大管理障礙,必須加倍投入管理成本,或重新建立管理策略方能有所改善。 影響「論文資料管理行為」之情境因素共有16項,這些因素分別表現出研究所生態、學位論文研究歷程、設備及資訊物件等四種特徵,並且分別對「論文資料管理行為」之不同層面帶來影響。其中「論文研究任務」因素對於「學位論文相關電子資料」(論文資料集合)產生顯著影響,多數受訪者在主要分類(第一階層之子資料夾)中,都設置了「參考文獻」、「論文正文」、「報告用投影片」以及「研究資料」等資料夾。 研究生普遍認知到「論文資料管理」之重要性,並且指出「組織」之目的就是為了便於「已知資訊搜尋」。多數研究生都能夠對自己的管理方式感到滿意,並且對論文資料之使用記憶有相當之自信。對於所使用之載體與工具,研究生經常感到不甚滿意,無論他們是否熟悉電腦科技。如果研究生在評估後發現,所投入的組織成本(時間、注意力、體力、金錢)未必能夠回收對等的效益,可能對論文資料之「組織」表現出一種「堪用即可」之態度。 另一方面,研究生的「資料夾目錄結構」分別有「集中式」和「扁平式」兩種不同結構型態,而他們對「整理資料的時間點」之偏好,亦可分為「預先組織」和「延遲組織」兩種不同策略,這種「分歧性」適足以說明個人資訊管理行為中的「成本交換」現象。 綜合前述研究結果,本研究建議一般電腦使用者和研究生在資料累積初期便著手開始整理,並且養成隨時監控、定期整理的習慣;建議學校、系所與學術圖書館分別針對資訊組織之概念性技能、電腦工具技能,為研究生開設論文資料管理技能講座;未來相關研究可進一步探索不同情境下之PIM最佳實務,並採用本研究所提出之「學位論文相關電子資料管理行為」概念架構予以分析、解釋;最後,建議個人資訊系統之設計者和服務提供者,以個人資訊行為模式與個人資訊管理之困難為基礎,思考設計與服務之方向,並且為電腦技能弱勢者開發更親和的友善介面和即時化的使用協助服務,造福真正需要軟體協助的人。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study is to investigate personal information management (PIM) behavior with electronic information in context of thesis and dissertation researches (TDR). Three research questions are proposed, (1) how does a graduate/doctoral student manage his/her electronic information of thesis? (2) how does the context of TDR influence a person’s PIM behavior? (3) what is the viewpoint of a graduate/doctoral student to PIM of TDR electronic information?
Two stages were carried out. In first stage, we collected qualitative data by the method of interview and observed participants’ behaviors as well. The object was to understand participants’ PIM behaviors of TDR. 5 doctoral students and 7 graduate students in different disciplinary were recruited. In second stage, we collected quantitative data through an online questionnaire survey. The object was to verify the qualitative data and increase the credibility of the study. 214 questionnaires were valid. We proposed 22 types PIM activities of TDR electronic information, which could be induced into four facets, including Storage, Organizing, Known-item Searching, and Meta-Management. Moreover, a graduate/doctoral student had to invest more in management or re-build the management strategy to figure out the difficulties such as the problem of storage, organizing, known-item searching, and tool using he/she might encounter. 16 contextual elements was supposed to make influence on PIM activities of TDR, which could be induced into four facets, including Academic Environment, TDR Process, Facilities, and Information items. We also found that most students were aware of the importance of PIM in the process of TDR. They believed that they will take advantage of “Organized information” to refind the known-items quickly. But if they thought the cost of organizing information was too much, they just want to solve immediate problems. In general, students were proud of the ways of management. Moreover, they were often disappointed at the tools for PIM. We suggest users periodically monitor and organize their personal information. For college and academic libraries, it is suggested to establish courses of PIM skills, including conceptual skills of information management and computer softwares. For PIM researchers, “the best practice of PIM in different contexts” and “when to do meta-management” are valuable research issues. Finally, for PIM system designers and service providers, it is important to think of patterns of PIM behaviors in different contexts and help people with poor computer skills. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:42:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R91126006-1.pdf: 2960122 bytes, checksum: 57f606624f762b55a69e5c74c39c4ca0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract iii 目次 v 表目次 vii 圖目次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第四節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻分析 7 第一節 「個人資訊管理」研究之概述 7 第二節 個人資訊管理行為研究 19 第三節 學位論文研究情境與研究資料管理 27 第三章 研究設計與實施 30 第一節 研究取向與範圍 30 第二節 研究階段一:訪談及觀察 31 第三節 研究階段二:問卷調查 33 第四節 研究實施流程 34 第四章 訪談與觀察結果分析 38 第一節 「管理活動」與「問題」面向 43 第二節 「情境」面向 67 第三節 「個人因素」面向 85 第五章 問卷調查結果分析 95 第一節 填答者背景與論文資料管理經驗 95 第二節 主要變項之交叉分析 110 第三節 綜合討論 116 第六章 結論與建議 119 第一節 重要研究發現 119 第二節 結論 123 第三節 建議 126 參考文獻 130 附錄一 訪談綱要 137 附錄二 學位論文相關電子資料之管理行為調查問卷 139 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 從個人資訊管理探討學位論文相關電子資料之管理行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Behavior of Thesis and Dissertation Research Information Management: From the Perspective of Personal Information Management | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳美美(Mei-Mei Wu),唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 個人資訊管理,情境,資訊行為,學位論文研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Personal Information Management,Context,Information Behavior,Thesis and Dissertation Research, | en |
dc.relation.page | 146 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-09-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。