請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41729
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曾美惠 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chien-Ying Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊千瑩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:29:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-02-10 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-02-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-01-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Milberger, S., & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents’ perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 287–293.
Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Ayers, A. J. (1979). Sensory Integration and the Child. Los Angle: Western Psychological Services. Baranek, G. T. (1998). Sensory processing in persons with autism and developmental disabilities: considerations for research and clinical practice. Sensory Integration Special Interest Quarterly, 21(2). Baranek, G. T. (1999). Autism during infancy: A retrospective video analysis of sensory-motor and social behaviors at 9-12 months of age. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 213-224. Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 32, 397– 422. Baranek, G. T., Boyd, B. A., Poe, M. D., David, F. J., & Watson, L. R. (2007). Hyperresponsive sensory patterns in young children with autism, developmental delay, and typical development. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 112(4), 233-245. Baranek, G. T., David, F. J., Poe, M. D., Stone, W. L., & Watson, L. R. (2006). Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 591-601. Baranek, G. T., Foster, L. G., & Berkson, G. (1997a). Sensory defensiveness in persons with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17, 173-185. Baranek, G. T., Foster, L. G., & Berkson, G. (1997b). Tactile defensiveness and stereotyped behaviors. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 91–95. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-culture adaptation of self-report measure. Spine, 25, 3186-3191. Bennett, J. W., & Peterson, C, Q. (1995). The Touch Inventory for Elementary-School-Aged Children: Test-retest reliability and mother-child correlations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 795-801. Ben-Sasson, A., Cermak, S. A., Orsmond., G. I., Tager-Flusberg, H., Carter., A. S, Kadlec, M. B., & Dunn, W. (2007). Extreme sensory modulation behaviors in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 584-592. Ben-Sasson, A., Cermak, S. A., Orsmond., G. I., Tager-Flusberg, H., Kadlec, M. B., & Carter., A. S. (2008). Sensory clusters of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: differences in affective symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49: 8, 817-825. Brown, C., Tollefson, N., Dunn, W., Cromwell, R., & Filion, D. (2001). The Adult Sensory Profile: Measuring patterns of sensory processing. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 75-82. Bundy, A. C., Lane, S. J., & Murray, E. A. (Eds.). (2002). Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Bundy, A. C. & Murray, E. A. (2002). Sensory modulation. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3-33). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Case-Smith, J. (1997). Clinical interpretation of “factor analysis on the sensory profile from a national sample of children without disabilities”. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 496–499. Case-Smith, J., Butcher, L., & Reed, D. (1998). Parent’s report of sensory responsiveness and temperaments in preterm infants. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(7), 547-555. Cohn, E., Miller, L. J., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2000). Parental hopes for therapy outcomes: Children with sensory modulation disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 36–43. Coster, W., Deeney, T., Haltiwanger, J., & Haley, S. (1998). School Function Assessment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Cooperation. Chow, S. M. K. (2005). The suitability of the Sensory Profile for diagnosing sensory modulation dysfunctions in Chinese children. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28, 153–158. Dahlgren, S. V., & Gillberg, C. (1989). Symptoms in the first two years of life: a preliminary population study of infantile autism. European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Science, 238, 169-174. Davis, P. L., & Gavin, W. J. (2007). Validating the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders using EEG technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 176–189. DeGangi, G. A. (1991). Assessment of sensory, emotional, and attentional problems in regulatory disordered infants: Part 1. Infants and Young Children, 3(3), 1-8. DeGangi, G. A., & Greenspan, S. I. (1989). Test of Sensory Functions in Infants manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. DeGangi, G. A., Poisson, S., Sickel, R. Z., & Weiner, A. S. (1995). Infant/Toddler Symptom Checklist. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. DeGangi, G. A., Porges, S. W., Sickel, R. Z., & Greespan, S. I. (1993). Four-year follow-up of a sample of regulatory disordered infants. Infant Mental Health, 14, 330-343. Dunn, W. (1994). Performance of typical children on the Sensory Profile: an item analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 967–974. Dunn, W. (1999). The Sensory Profile: Examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Dunn, W. (2002). The Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile: Examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and families: A conceptual model. Infants and Young Children, 9(4), 23–25. Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations, 2001 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 608–620. Dunn, W., & Bennett, D. (2002). Patterns of sensory processing in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22, 1, 4-15. Dunn, E., & Brown, C. (1997). Factor analysis on the Sensory Profile from a national sample of children without disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 490-495. Dunn, W., & Daniels, D. B. (2002). Initial development of the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile. Journal of Early Intervention, 25(1), 27-41 Dunn, W., Myles, B. S., & Orr, S. (2002). Sensory processing issues associated with Asperger syndrome: a preliminary investigation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 97-102. Dunn, W., & Westman, K. (1997). The Sensory Profile: the performance of anational sample of children with and without disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 25-33. Ermer, J., & Dunn, W. (1998). The Sensory Profile: a discriminant analysis of children with and without disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 4, 283-290. Fisher, A. G., & Murray, E. A. (1991). Introduction to sensory integration theory. In A.G. Fisher, E.A. Murray, & A.C. Bundy (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 27-45). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Greenspan, S., & Wieder, S. (1997). Developmental patterns and outcomes in infants and children with disorders in relating and communicating: A chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnoses. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 1, 87-141. Hanft, B. E., Miller, L. J., & Lane, S. L. (2000). Toward a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: part3: observable behaviors: sensory integration dysfunction. Sensory Integration Special Interest Quarterly, 23 (3). Hickman, L. (2001). Sensory integration and Fragile X Syndrome. In S. S. Roley, & E. I. Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the nature of sensory integration with diverse populations (pp. 409-420). San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders. Hotz, S. D., Royeen, C. B. (1998). Perception of behaviors associated with tactile defensiveness: An exploration of the differences between mothers and their children. Occupational Therapy International, 5(4), 281-292. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders (ICDL). (2005). Diagnostic manual for infancy and early childhood: Mental health, developmental, regulatory–sensory processing and language disorders and learning challenges (ICDL–DMIC). Bethesda, MD: Author. Jirikowic, T. L., Engel, J. M., & Deitz, J. C. (1997). The Test of Sensory Functions in Infants: test-retest reliability for infants with developmental delays. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 733-738. Johnson-Ecker, C. L., & Parham, D. (2000). The evaluation of sensory processing: a validity study using contrasting group. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 494–503. Jöreskog. K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS. Kientz, M. A., & Dunn, W. (1997). A comparison of the performance of children with and without autism on the sensory profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 530–537. Kinnealey, M. (1998). Princess or tyrant: A case report of a child with sensory defensiveness. Occupational Therapy International, 5(4), 293-303. Lai, J., Parham, D., & Johnson-Ecker, C. (1999, December). Sensory dormancy and sensory defensiveness: two sides of the same coin? Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Quarterly, 22, 1-4. Lane, S. J. (2002). Sensory modulation. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 101-122). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Lane, S. J., Miller, L. J., & Hanft, B. E. (2000, June). Toward a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 2: Sensory integration patterns of function and dysfunction. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Quarterly, 23, 1–3. Larson, K. (1982). The sensory history of developmentally delayed children with and without tactile defensiveness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 590-596. Lin, C. K., Lin, J. H., Lin, M. H., Lin, Y. S., Li, Y. J., Jhuang, M. Y., Chang, P. Y., Jian, J. R. (2004). Evaluation of Sensory Integration Function for Children: Examiner’s manual. Taipei: The Psychological Corporation. Mailloux, Z. (2001). Sensory integration principles in intervention with children with autistic disorder. In S. S. Roley, E. I. Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the Nature of Sensory Integration with Diverse Populations (pp. 365-384). San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders. Mangeot, S. D., Miller, L. J., McIntosh, D. N., McGrath-Clark, J., Simon, J., Hagerman, R. J., & Goldson, E. (2001). Sensory modulation dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43, 399-406. McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Hagerman, R. (1999). Sensory-modulation disruption, electrodermal responses, and functional behaviors. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 608–615. Miller, L. J., Anzalone, M. E., Lane, S. J., Cermak, S. A., Osten, E. T. (2007). Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 135-140. Miller, L. J., Coll, J. R., & Schoen, S. A. (2007). A randomized controlled pilot study of the effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 228–238. Miller, L. J. & Lane, S. (2000). Toward to a consensus in terminology of sensory integration theory and practice: Part 1: Taxonomy of neurophysiologic processes. Sensory Integration Special Interest Quarterly, 23(1), 1-4. Miller, L. J., McIntosh, D. N., McGrath, J., Shyu, V., Lampe, M., Taylor, A. K., Tassone, F., Neitzel, K., Stackhouse, T., & Hagerman, R. J. (1999). Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with Fragile X Syndrome: a preliminary report. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 83 (4), 268-279. Miller, L. J., Reisman, J. E., McIntosh, D. N., & Simon, J. (2001). An ecological model of sensory modulation: performance of children with Fragile X syndrome, autistic disorder, attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder, and sensory modulation dysfunction. In S. S. Roley, E. I. Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the Nature of Sensory Integration with Diverse Populations (pp. 57-88). San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders. Mille-Kuhaneck, H., Henry, D. A., Glennon, T., & Mu, K. (2007). Development of the Sensory Processing Measure-School: initial studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61,170-175. Mulligan, S. (2002). Advances in sensory integration research. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 397–411). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. National Center for Clinical Infant Programs (NCCIP). (1994). Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood Arlington. VA: Zero to Three. Neuman, A. (2006). Patterns of response to sensory stimuli encountered in daily activities a comparison between 3-10-year-old Israeli and American children without disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 13, 79-99. Parham, L. D. (1997). Sensory questionnaire validity for children with autism. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American occupational Therapy Association, Orlando, FL. Parham, L. D., & Johnson-Ecker, C. L. (2002). Evaluation of Sensory Processing. In A.C. Bundy, S. J. Lane & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp.194-196). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company. Parham, L. D., & Mailloux, Z. (2005). Sensory integration. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Children (5th ed., pp. 356–411). St. Louis: Mosby. PDM Task Force. (2006). Psychodynamic diagnostic manual. Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice (2nd ed., pp. 61-75). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Provost, B., & Oetter, P. (1993). The Sensory Rating Scale for infants and young children: Development and re liability. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13(4), 15–35. Reeves, G. D. (2001). From neuron to behavior: regulation, arousal, and attention as important substrates for the process of sensory integration. In S. S. Roley, & E. I. Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the nature of sensory integration with diverse populations (pp. 89-108). San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders. Rogers, S. J., Hepburn, S., & Wehner, E. (2003). Parent reports of sensory symptoms in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 631–642. Rogers, S. J., & Ozonoff, S. (2005). Annotation: What do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism- A critical review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1255-1268. Rovinelli, F. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal for Educational Research, 2, 49–60. Royeen, C. B. (1986). The development of a touch scale for measuring tactile defensiveness in children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 414-419. Royeen, C. B. (1987a). Test-retest reliability of a touch scale for tactile defensiveness. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 7, 45-52. Royeen, C. B. (1987b). TIP-Touch Inventory for Preschoolers: A pilot study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 7, 29-40. Royeen, C. B., & Fortune, J. C. (1990). Touch Inventory for Elementary School Aged children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 155-159. Royeen, C, B., & Mu, K. (2003). Stability of tactile defensiveness across cultures: European and American children's responses to the Touch Inventory for Elementary School Aged Children (TIE). Occupational Therapy International, 10(3), 165-174. Royeen C. B., & Lane, S. J. (1991). Tactile processing and sensory defensiveness. In: A. G. Fisher, E. A. Murray, & A. C. Bundy (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp.108-136). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company. Schaaf, R. C., & Anzalone, M. E. (2001). Sensory integration with high-risk infants and young children. In S. S. Roley, & E. I. Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the nature of sensory integration with diverse populations (pp. 275-311). San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders. Schaaf, R. C., Miller, L. J., Seawell, D., & O’Keefe, S. (2003). Children with disturbances in sensory processing: A pilot study examining the role of the parasympathetic system. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 442-449. Schaaf, R. C., & Miller, L. J. (2005). Occupational therapy using a sensory integration approach for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 11, 143-148. Su, C. T. (2001). Introduction of the Evaluation of Sensory Processing and its translations for use in Taiwan. Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, R.O.C., 19, 60-70. Wu, M. Y., Yang, A. L., Hsu, W. L., Chang, C. C., Tsai, M. H., & Su, C. T. (2007). The Validity and Reliability of the Chinese version of evaluation of sensory processing, version 4, for use in Taiwan. Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, R.O.C., 25(1), 13-31. Tomchek, S. D., & Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the Short Sensory Profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 190–200. Tseng, M. H. (2002). Sensory Profile (in Chinese): Manual. School of Occupational Therapy College of Medicine, National Taiwan University: School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University. Watling, R., Dietz, J., & White, O. (2001). Comparison of sensory profile scores of young children with and without autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 416–423. White, B. P., Mulligan, S., Merrill, K., & Wright, J. (2007). An examination of the relationships between motor and process skills and scores on the Sensory Profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 154-160. Yochman,A., Parush, S., & Ornoy, A. (2004). Responses of preschool children with and without ADHD to sensory events in daily life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 294-302. Zero to Three. (2005). Diagnostic classification of mental health and developmental disorders of infancy and early childhood, revised (DC: 0–3R). Arlington, VA: National Center for Clinical Infant Programs. Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Rogers, T., Roberts, W., Brian, J., & Szatmari, P. (2005). Behavioral markers of autism in the first year of life. International Journal of Developmental Neurosciences, 23, 143–152. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41729 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究目的
本研究目的為編譯「嬰幼兒感覺史量表」(Dunn, 2002)為中文版本,並建立中文版本之初步心理計量特性,以發展一套簡便、實用且具信度的篩檢0-3 歲嬰幼兒感覺處理障礙的量表。 研究方法 首先將嬰幼兒感覺史量表之 0-6 個月及7-36 個月分量表翻譯為中文並作跨文化的編譯及修訂。研究對象分成三組,有兩組為典型發展嬰幼兒,共有367 位0-6 個月及677位7-36 個月嬰幼兒家長填答中文版嬰幼兒感覺史量表 (0-6 個月組:平均年齡3.4 個月,標準差為1.8 個月。7-36 個月組:平均年齡22.3 個月,標準差為8.2 個月);另一組為43名發展障礙嬰幼兒(平均年齡28.4 個月,標準差為6.7 個)。內在一致性檢驗為使用所有的典型發展嬰幼兒樣本,間隔二至三星期之再測信度為取樣30 位7-36 個月發展障礙嬰幼兒(平均年齡30.2 個月,標準差5.8 個月)。建構效度是使用驗證性因素分析來 檢驗原版嬰幼兒感覺史量表的四因素模式是否適用於台灣孩童;區辨效度則以邏輯迴歸分析比較發展障礙與典型發展嬰幼兒在各分測驗及象限的分數。 結果 0-6 個月的中文版嬰幼兒感覺史量表具備差至可接受的內在一致性(Cronbach’s α= 0.42 -0.75);7-36 個月的則具備可接受至好的內在一致性(Cronbach’s α= 0.53-0.87)。7-36個月中文版嬰幼兒感覺史量表總分具備良好的再測信度(ICC = 0.94)。除了視覺處理的分測驗分數的再測信度較低外(ICC = 0.56),其他分測驗分數及因素分數亦有可接受至好的再測信度(ICC = 0.69-0.91)。驗證性因素分析結果皆能支持原本的四因素模式:0-6 個月量表( RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.08, CFI = 0.93 and NNFI = 0.92)及7-36 個月量表 ( RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.06, CFI = 0.95 and NNFI = 0.94)。邏輯迴歸分析結果亦顯示中文版嬰幼兒感覺史量表的分數可用來區辨正常發展幼兒與發展障礙之幼兒。 結論 本研究結果顯示,中文版嬰幼兒感覺史量表具有可接受的信效度基礎,可適用於評量出生至三歲台灣嬰幼兒的感覺處理功能。然而,由於發展障礙族群的樣本年齡皆限制於7-36 個月,此為在台灣較常轉介至臨床接受治療的個案年齡層,故未來尚需探討0-6 個月版之再測信度及其區辨效度之驗證,以確認量表於臨床及研究上的實用性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aim of the study was to develop a Chinese version of the Infant Toddler Sensory Profile (ITSP-C) and investigate its psychometric properties when used in Taiwanese children.
Methods: First, the ITSP was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Chinese, including subscales for children ages 0-6 months and 7-36 months. The participants consisted of three cohorts: 367 typically developing infants ages 0 to 6 months (mean age = 3.44 months, SD = 1.82), 677 toddlers ages 7 to 36 months (mean age = 22.33 months, SD = 8.15), and 43 children with developmental disabilities, including developmental delays and Autism (mean age = 28.4 months, SD = 6.7). Parents of all the children completed the ITSP-C. Internal consistency was determined using all the typically developing infants and toddlers. Test-retest reliability was examined using 30 children with developmental disabilities (mean age = 30.23 months, SD = 5.78) in a 2-3 week interval. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess if the four-factor model of the original ITSP was applicable to Taiwanese data. To verify discriminative validity, the ITSP-C scores of the children with developmental disabilities were compared with those of the normally developing children using logistic regression analysis. Results: Internal consistency was poor to acceptable for children ages birth to 6 months (Cronbach’s α = 0.42-0.75), and acceptable to good for children ages 7 to 36 months (Cronbach’s α = 0.53-0.87). For the 7 to 36 month subscale, test-retest reliability was good for the total scores (ICC = 0.94), and acceptable to good for each section and each quadrant scores (ICC = 0.69-0.91), except the visual processing section scores (ICC = 0.56). The results of the CFA provided support for a four-factor model both for the 0-6 months subscale (RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.08, CFI = 0.93 and NNFI = 0.92) and the 7-36 months subscale (RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.06, CFI = 0.95 and NNFI = 0.94). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the ITSP-C were able to discriminate between children with developmental disabilities and normally developing children. Conclusions: The results of the present study supported the preliminary psychometric properties of the ITSP-C. That is, the ITSP-C has acceptable reliability and validity when used in Taiwanese children. However, only the test-retest reliability and discriminant validity of the 7-36 month scale assessed for children in this age range were most often referred to clinics in Taiwan. Thus, additional studies are needed to examine the test-retest reliability and discriminant validity of the 0-6 month subscale in order to establish its utility in both clinical and research settings. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:29:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95429010-1.pdf: 769162 bytes, checksum: a0dcadf9b202231015f7df7e01c5ecfc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | List of Tables 8
List of Figures 10 List of Appendices 11 Introduction 12 Literature Review 17 Definition of Sensory Processing and Sensory Processing Disorders 17 Dunn’s Model of Sensory Processing 18 Sensory Modulation Disorder (SMD) and Sensory Modulation Problem in the Children with Developmental Disorders 21 Caregiver-report Questionnaires for Measuring Sensory Processing in Infants and Toddlers 27 Methods 33 Instruments 33 Description of the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile 33 Procedures 36 The Translation Process of the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile 36 Sampling procedure 37 Participants 38 Data analysis 39 Results 43 Item analysis 43 Gender & Age Differences 43 Reliability 44 Internal consistency 44 Test-retest reliability 45 Validity 45 Construct validity-- Confirmatory Factor Analysis 45 Discriminant validity 46 Discussion 47 Item analysis 47 Gender & Age Differences 47 Reliability 48 Validity 49 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 50 Conclusions 52 References 53 Tables 64 Figures 103 Appendices 105 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中文版嬰幼兒感覺史量表之信效度研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Psychometric properties of the Chinese Version of the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姚開屏,蘇佳廷,林巾凱 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 感覺處理,感覺調節,感覺統合,感覺處理障礙,小兒職能治療, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | sensory processing,sensory modulation,sensory integration,sensory processing disorders,pediatric occupational therapy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 113 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-01-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 751.13 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。