請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41629
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 費昌勇 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Ling Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳芷苓 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:25:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-10 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-02-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-01-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 波伊曼編著 張忠宏等譯 1997為動物說話:動物權利的爭議
2. 費昌勇 2006台灣地區狗從動物收容所認養後再棄養之原因分析 3. 費昌勇 2003動物倫理與公共政策(動物保護檢查員訓練講義)行政院農業委員會 4. 費昌勇 2007九十六年度全國家犬家貓數目調查報告 行政院農業委員會 5. 費昌勇主編 2003流浪動物跨領域研究論文集(一)農委會動植物防疫檢疫局 6. 楊姮稜 2002 畜主對畜犬行為發展之影響研究 國立台灣大學獸醫研究所博士論文 7. 蘇耀期 2003 台灣地區動物保護法實施後家犬與流浪犬數目變化之研究 國立台灣大學獸醫研究所博士論文 8. Borchelt PL. 1991.Animal illness and human emotion. Behavioral problems. Probl Vet Med. 3(1):83-94. 9. Christian Jochim. 1986. Chinese Religions, a cultural perspective. Prentice Hall. 10. Endenburg N, Knol BW. 1994.Behavioural, household, and social problems associated with companion animals: opinions of owners and non-owners. Vet Q. 16(2):130-4. 11. García-Rodríguez A, Peracho V, Villalbí JR, Bouis S, Duràn J, Guix J. 2008. Advances in the management of an animal shelter. Gac Sanit. 22(1):76-8. 12. Gonyou HW.1994. Why the study of animal behavior is associated with the animal welfare issue. J Anim Sci. 72(8):2171-7. 13. Hsu Y, Severinghaus LL, Serpell JA. 2003.Dog keeping in Taiwan: its contribution to the problem of free-roaming dogs. J Appl Anim Welf Sci.;6(1):1-23. 14. Juarbe-Díaz SV. 1997. Assessment and treatment of excessive barking in the domestic dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 27(3):515-32. 15. Marder A, Duxbury MM. 2008. Obtaining a pet: realistic expectations. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 38(5):1145-62. 16. Marder AR, Marder LR. 1985. Human-companion animal relationships and animal behavior problems. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 15(2):411-21. 17. Mondelli F, Prato Previde E, Verga M, Levi D, Magistrelli S, Valsecchi P. 2004.The bond that never developed: adoption and relinquishment of dogs in a rescue shelter. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 7(4):253-66. 18. Neidhart L, Boyd R. 2002. Companion animal adoption study. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 5(3):175-92. 19. New JC Jr, Salman MD, Scarlett JM, Kass PH, Vaughn JA, Scherr S, Kelch WJ. 1999. Moving: characteristics of dogs and cats and those relinquishing them to 12 U.S. animal shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2(2):83-95. 20. Notaro SJ. 2004. Disposition of shelter companion animals from nonhuman animal control officers, citizen finders, and relinquished by caregivers. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 7(3):181-8. 21. Odendaal JS. 2005. Science-based assessment of animal welfare: companion animals. Rev. sci. tech. 24 (2), 493-502 22. Olson PN, Moulton C. 1993. Pet (dog and cat) overpopulation in the United States. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 47:433-8. 23. Reaser JK, Clark EE Jr, Meyers NM. 2008. All Creatures Great and Minute: A Public Policy Primer for Companion Animal Zoonoses. Zoonoses Public Health. Apr 8. 24. Salman MD, Hutchison J, Ruch-Gallie R, Kogan L, New JC Jr, Kass P, Scarlett J. 2000. Behavioral Reasons for Relinquishment of Dogs and Cats to 12 Shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 3(2), 93-106. 25. Salman MD, New JG Jr, Scarlett JM, Kass PH, Ruch-Gallie R, Hetts S. 1998. Human and Animal Factors Related to the Relinquishment of Dogs and Cats in 12 Selected Animal Shelters in the United States. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 1(3):207-26. 26. Scarlett JM, Salman MD, New JG Jr, Kass PH. 1999. Reasons for relinquishment of companion animals in U.S. animal shelters: selected health and personal issues. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2(1):41-57. 27. Sherman BL. 2008. Separation Anxiety in Dogs. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 30(1):27-42. 28. Shore ER. 2005. Returning a recently adopted companion animal: adopters' reasons for and reactions to the failed adoption experience. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 8(3):187-98. 29. Shore ER, Petersen CL, Douglas DK. 2003. Moving as a reason for pet relinquishment: a closer look. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 6(1):39-52. 30. Sunstein CR, Nussbaum MC. 2004. Animal Right. Oxford University Press, Inc. 31. Tuber DS, Miller DD, Caris KA, Halter R, Linden F, Hennessy MB. 1999. Dogs in animal shelters: problems, suggestions, and needed expertise. Psychological science. VOL.10, NO.5. 32. Turner DC. 1995. Ethology and good health in pets. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 137(2):45-9. 33. Weng HY, Kass PH, Hart LA, Chomel BB. 2006. Animal protection measures in Taiwan: Taiwanese attitudes toward the animal protection law and animal shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 9(4):315-26. 34 .WSPA, 2007, animal welfares module 26.27 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41629 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究是探討台灣動物保護法於1998年11月公佈二年後(2000)起至2007年,台灣全國動物收容所每年進出狗數之變化趨勢。每年進入動物收容所狗之來源,分別為:動物保護員(Animal Control Officer, ACO)捕捉與飼主棄養。全國進入動物收容所之總狗數從2000年至2007年依次為61,181隻(2000)、55,658隻(2001)、59,646隻(2002)、71,980隻(2003)、75,648隻(2004)、80,329隻(2005)、94,689隻(2006)、109,136隻(2007),有逐漸升高之趨勢;其主要之來源是由動物保護員捕捉,百分比依次為96%(2000)、91%(2001)、86%(2002)、83%(2003)、85%(2004)、85%(2005)、86%(2006)、88%(2007),至於飼主主動送交動物收容所棄養之比例則較低。每年離開動物收容所狗之途徑,分別為:安樂死、認領養、病死或走失,安樂死為其主要之離開原因,全國每年安樂死之百分比從2000年至2007年依次為70%(2000)、58%(2001)、60%(2002)、65%(2003)、64%(2004)、73%(2005)、75%(2006)、75%(2007),認領養百分比一直在19%至12%之間。數據顯示台灣地區在公佈動物保護法後十年來,棄養的家狗數目逐年增加,但動物收容所認領養之比例並未增加。本研究亦從台灣之主流宗教文化層面進行討論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Animal Protection Law was publicly enforced in November 1998. This essay mainly investigates the numbers of dogs entered and exited animal shelters in Taiwan from 2000 (two years after The Animal Protection Law was publicly announced) to 2007.
There are two ways of dogs entered shelters, being “Animal Control Officer (ACO) captured” and “surrender by owners.” National numbers of dogs entered shelters from 2000 to 2007 are: 61,181(2000), 55,658(2001), 59,646 (2002), 71,980(2003), 75,648(2004), 80,329(2005), 94,689(2006), 109,136(2007), posing the increasing trend. Most of those entered are categorized as “Animal Control Officer capture,” the ratios from 2000 to 2007 are: 96%(2000), 91%(2001), 86%(2002), 83%(2003), 85%(2004), 85%(2005), 86%(2006), 88%(2007). Dogs “surrendered by owners” are very few. Ways of dogs to exit shelters comprise ‘euthanasia”, “reclaimed and adopted”, “ill or fight to death” and “other or lost”. The majority of them is euthanasia. Ratios of euthanasia from 2000 to 2007 are: 70%(2000), 58%(2001), 60%(2002), 65%(2003), 64%(2004), 73%(2005), 75%(2006), 75%(2007). Ratios of “reclaimed and adopted” from 2000 to 2007 are between 19% and 12%. Although abandoned dogs have been increasing, but dogs to be “reclaimed and adopted” from shelters are not increasing proportionally. This thesis also discusses from the aspect of Chinese religions on the barrier to solve the pet overpopulation problem. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:25:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95629027-1.pdf: 1120137 bytes, checksum: 700ad2d29f96ab4c923ae2274d9d4737 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 1
英文摘要 2 第一章 前言 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第三章 材料與方法 33 第四章 結果 34 第五章 研究討論與結論 38 附錄 全國與各縣市統計圖表 40 參考文獻 94 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣動物收容所動物族群數之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A study of the animal populations in animal shelters in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林大盛,李建穀 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 動物保護員捕捉,飼主棄養,安樂死,認領養,病死或走失, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Animal Control Officer (ACO) captureds,surrender by owners,euthanasia,reclaimed and adopted,ill or fight to death,other or lost, | en |
dc.relation.page | 97 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-01-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 獸醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 獸醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 獸醫學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。