請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41577完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張亞中(Ya-Chung Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meng-Ru Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李孟儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:23:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-02-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-02-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-01-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
壹、 中文 布哈林（Nikolai Bukharin）著，呂智明 譯，《帝國主義與世界經濟》，台北：南方叢書，1988。 加爾布雷斯（John K. Galbraith）著，何欣 譯，《新工業國家》，台北：台灣開明，1972。 卡爾．馬克思（Karl Marx），《資本論（第一卷）》，中共中央馬克思列寧恩格斯斯大林著作編譯局 譯，北京：人民出版社, 1978。 卡爾．馬克思 (Karl Marx)，弗．恩格斯 (Frederick Engels)，「德意志意識形態」，《馬克思恩格斯全集（第三卷）》，北京：人民出版社，1965，頁11~640。 布里哥金 著（Prigogine, Ilya），沈力 譯，《從存在到演化》，台北：結構群，1990。 史考特(John Scott) 著，張峰 譯，《公司經濟與資本家階級》，重慶：重慶，2002 史迪格里茲 ( Joseph E. Stiglitz) 著，齊思賢 張元馨 譯，《狂飆的十年》台北：天下遠見，2005。 李任初，《新自由主義：宏觀的經濟蛻變》，台北：台灣商務，1992。 伯利（Berle, Adolf A.） 米恩斯（Means, Gardiner C.）著，陸年青 許冀湯 合譯，《現代股份公司與私有財產》，台北：台灣銀行，1981。 希法亭（Rudolf Hilferding） 著，福民 等譯，王輔民 校，《金融資本》，北京：商務印書館，1997。 宋鎮照，《發展政治經濟學–理論與實踐》，台北：五南，2000。 亞當史密斯（Adam Smith）著， 謝宗林、李華夏 譯，《國富論》，台北：先覺，2000。 阿爾貝(Michel Albert) 著，莊武英 譯，《兩種資本主義之戰》，台北：聯經，1995。 威廉格雷德 (William Greider) 著，張定准等 譯，《資本主義全球化的瘋狂邏輯》，北京：社會科學文獻，2003。 陳德純，《企業改革法制建構之比較法探討–以美國企業改革法（The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002）為中心》，私立東吳大學法律學研究所，2003。 陳靜蓉，《為什麼財務分析師不能偵測地雷股》，國立台灣大學財務研究所碩士論文，2002。 凱因斯（John M. Keynes）著，李蘭甫 譯，《就業、利息與貨幣的一般理論》，台北：台灣銀行，1964。 傅利曼（Milton Friedman）著，鄧宗培 譯，《貨幣安定計劃》，台北：台灣銀行，1969。 傅利曼（Milton Friedman）著，張瑞玉 譯，《資本主義與自由》，北京：商務印書館，2004。 奧爾森(Mancur Olson) 著，董安琪 譯，《集體行動的邏輯》，台北：遠流，1989。 諾瑞娜．赫茲 (Noreena Hertz) 著，許玉雯 譯，《當企業購併國家：全球資本主義與民主之死》，台北：經濟新潮社，2003。 蕭全政，《台灣地區的新重商主義》，台北：國家政策研究資料中心，1989。 蕭全政，「擺盪於主客體之間的 “人”– 現代倫理與公德的人性基礎」，《政治科學論叢》，第十一期，1999。 羅斯克蘭斯（Rosecrance, Richard N. ）著，李振昌 譯，《虛擬國家：新世紀的財富與權力》，台北：聯經，2000。 貳、 外文 Aguiar, Luis L. M. and Andrew Herod, ed., The Dirty Work of Neoliberalism, MA: Blackwell, 2006. Bakan, Joel, The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, New York: Free Press, 2004. Barret, Matthew J. ‘Enron and Andersen-What Went Wrong and Why Similar Audit Failures Could Happen Again’, in ENRON: Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications, New York: Foundation Press, 2004. Bebchuk, Lucian and Jesse Fried, Pay without Performance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England, 2004. Bell, Daniel, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting , New York: Basic Book, 1976. , ‘The Breakup of Family Capitalism’, The End of Ideology:On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp.39~45. Bendix, Reinhard, Work and Authority in Industry: Ideology of Management in The Course of Industrialization, New York: Harper & Row, 1963. Bienkowski, Wojciech, Josef C. Brada, Marusz-Jan Radlo ed., Reaganomics Goes Global, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Boskin, Michael J., Reagan and the U.S. Economy, San Francisco, California: ICS Press, Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1987. Brandeis, Louis D., Other People’s Money and How the Bankers Use It, New York: F. A. Stokers, 1914. Robert Bryce, Pipe Dreams, New York: Public Affairs, 2002. Carnoy, Martin, The State and Political Theory, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984. Carson, Margaret M., ‘Enron and the New Economy’, Competitiveness Review 11, Vol. 2, 2001, pp. 1~3. Chandler, D. Alfred, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1977. Coase, R., ‘The Nature of The Firm’, Economica: 4, 1937, pp.386~405. Coffee, John, Auditors and Analysts: An Analysis of the Evidence and Reform Proposals in Light of the Enron Experience, U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, March5 2002. , “Understanding Enron: It’s About the Gatekeepers, Stupid”, in ENRON: Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications, New York: Foundation Press, 2004. , Gatekeepers: the professions and corporate governance, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Cruver, Brain, Anatomy of Greed: The Unshredded Truth from an Enron Insider, New York: Carroll & Graf, 2002. Dahrendorf, Ralf, Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, California: Stanford University Press, 1959. De Vroey, Michel, ‘The Separation of Ownership and Control of Large Corporations’, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 7, No. 2, July 1975, pp. 1~10. Bala G. Dharan, ‘Enron’s Accounting Issues: What Can We Learn to Prevent Future Enrons?’, Testimony in Lessons Learned From Eron’s Collapse: Auditing The Accounting Industry, S. Doc. No. 107, Feb. 6, 2002, pp. 87~96. Dimma, William, A. Tougher Boards for Tougher Times: Corporate Governance in the Post-Enron Era, Mississauga, Ontario: John Wiley & Sons Canada, 2006. Domhoff, William G., Who Rules America? , Englewood Cliffs, NJ. : Prentice-Hall, 1967. Dooley, Peter C., ‘ The Interlocking Directorate’ , The American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, June 1969, pp. 314~323. Duménil, Gérard and Dominique Lévy, Capital Resurgent, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2004. , ‘Neoliberal Income Trends: Wealth, Class and Ownership in the USA’, New Left Review, 30, 2004, pp. 105~133. Eichenwald, Kurt, Conspiracy of Fools : a true story, New York : Broadway Books, 2005. Epstein, Gerald A., ed., Financialization and the World Economy, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2005. Erturk, Ismail, Julie Froud, Sukhdev Johal, Adam Leaver and Karel Williams, ed., Financialization at Work, London; New York: Routledge, 2008. D’Souza, Dinesh, Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became an Extraordinary Leader, New York: The Free Press, 1997. Fairman, Peter, Privatization of Federal Government Functions: Reagan, Clinton and the Theory/Action Paradox, Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2001. Fox , Loren, Enron: The Rise and Fall, New Jersey: Wiley, 2003. Gilbert, Milton ed., The Modern Business Enterprise: Selected Readings, London: Penguin, 1972. Goodman, Marshall R. and Margaret T. Wrightson, Managing Regulatory Reform: The Reagan Strategy and Its Impact, New York: Praeger, 1987. Gordon, Aaron Robert, Business Leadership in the Large Corporation, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1945 Gourevitch, Peter, ‘Collective Action Problems in Monitoring Managers: the Enron Case as A Systemic Problem’, Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter, Vol. 3, No. 3, June 2002, pp. 3~16. Gowland, David, The Regulation of Financial Markets, Hampshire: Edward Elgar, 1991. Granderson, Gerald, ‘Regulation, Open-Access Transportation, and Productive Efficiency’, Review of Industrial Organization 16, 2000, pp. 251~266. Harvey, David, The Limits to Capital, London: Verso, 1999. , A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 , Spaces of Global Capitalism, London: Verso, 2006. Heilbroner, Robert L., The Nature and Logic of Capitalism, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1985. , The Making of Economic Society, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989. Helleiner, Eric, States and the Reemergence of Global Finance, Ithaca, New York; London: Cornell University Press, 1994. Hirschman, Albert O., The Passions and the Intersts: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997. Jones, Geoffrey, ‘Multinationals from the 1930s to the 1980s’, in Leviathans, ed. by Alfried D. Chandler, Jr., Bruce Mazlish, Cambridge UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Julius, DeNnne, Global Companies and Public Policy, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1990. Koenig, Thomas and Robert Gogel, ‘Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 4, No. 1, January, 1981, pp.37~51. Konzelmann, Suzanne J., ‘Learning from Enron’, Corporate Governance, Vol. 12, No. 2, April 2004, pp. 134~142. Krieger, Joel, Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Decline, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986. Krippner, Greta R., ‘Accumulation and The Profits of Finance’, in Ismail Erturk, Julie Froud, Sukhdev Johal, Adam Leaver and Karel Williams, ed., Financialization at Work, London; New York: Routledge, 2008, pp. 191~208. Krugman, Paul, The Great Unraveling, New York: Norton 2003. Lambert, Jeremiah D., Energy Companies and market Reform: How Deregulation Went Wrong, Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell, 2006. Lenin, V. I., Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press, 1996. Lintner, John, ‘The Financing of Corporations’, in Edward S. Manson ed., The Corporation in Modern Society, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966, pp.166~201. Mace, Myles L., Directors: Myth and Reality, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1986. Mariolis, Peter, ‘Interlocking Directorates and Control of Corporations: The Theory of Bank Control’, Social Science Quarterly, 56, 1975, pp.425~439. Mclean, Bethany and Peter Elkind, The Smartest Guys in the Room: the amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron, New York: Portfolio, 2003. Miliband, Ralph, The state in Capitalist Society, New York: Basic Books, 1969. Class Power and State Power: Political Essays, London: Verso and NLB, 1983. Mintz, Beth and Michael Schwartz, ‘The Structure of Intercorporate Unity in American Business’, Social Problems, Vol. 29, No. 2, December, 1981, pp. 87-103. Moohr, Geraldine Szott, ‘An Enron Lesson: The Modest Role of Criminal Law In Preventing Corporate Crime’ in ENRON: Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications, pp. 431~466, New York: Foundation Press, 2004. Morison, Mary Ashby, ‘Rush to judgment: the lynching of Arthur Andersen & Co.’ Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 2004, pp. 335~375. Nichols, Theo, Ownership, Control and Ideology: An Enquiry into Certain Aspects of Modern Business Ideology, London: Allen & Unwin, 1969. Niskanen, William A., Reaganomics: An Insider’s Accoutn of the Policies and the People, New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. Orhangazi, Özgür, Financialization and the US Economy, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2008. Öniş,Ziya, ‘Review: The Logic of Developmental State’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 24, No. 1, October 1991, pp. 109~126. Partony, Frank, ‘Enron and the Derivatives World’, ENRON: Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications, New York: Foundation Press, 2004. Peden, G.C., British Economic and Social Policy: Llyod George to Margaret Thatcher, London: Philip Allan, 1991. Pennings, Johannes M., Interlocking Directorates, San Francisco: Jossey – Bass Publishers, 1980. Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press, 1957. Revsine, Lawrence, ‘Enron: sad but inevitable’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 21, 2002. Rezaee, Zabihollah, ‘Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 2005. Riddel, Peter, The Thatcher Decade, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1989. Salter, Malcolm S., Innovation Corrupted, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press, 2008. Scott, John, Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Shiller, Robert J., Irrational Exuberance, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2000. Sloan, John W., The Reagan Effect: Economics And Presidential Leadership, Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1999. Squires, Susan E., Cynthia J. Smith, Lorna McDougall, William R. Yeack, Inside Arthur Andersen: Shifting Values, Unexpected Consequences, New Jersey: FT Prentice Hall, 2003. Stockhamer, Engelbert, ‘Financialization and The Slowdown of Accumulation’, in Ismail Erturk, Julie Froud, Sukhdev Johal, Adam Leaver and Karel Williams, ed., Financialization at Work, London; New York: Routledge, 2008, pp. 209~222. Swatrz, Mimi with Sherron Watkins, Power Failure: The Inside Story of the Collapse of Enron, New York: Doubleday, 2003. Sweezy, Paul M., The Theory of Capitalist Development, New York: Modern Reader Paperbacks, 1970. Thompson, Grahame, ‘The relationship between financial and industrial sector in the United Kingdom’, Economy and Society, Vol. 6, 1977, pp. 235~283. , ‘The US Economy in the 1990s: The “New Economy” Assessed’, in Where are National Capitalisms Now?, ed. by Jonathan Perraton and Ben Clift, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, pp. 12~32. Van Lear, William, A Populist Challenge to Corporate Capitalism, New Jersey: World Scientific, 2002. Williams, Bob, ‘Enron Looking to International Arena for Growth Via Hydrocarbon/Power Schemes’, Oil & Gas Journal, Vol. 96, 26, Jun 29, 1998, pp. 61~63. Wilson, Steven Harmon ‘Malefactors of Great Wealth: A Short History of Aggressive Accounting’, in ENRON: Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications, New York: Foundation Press, 2004. Wright, Erick Olin, ‘Class, Occupation and Organization’, in David Dunkerley and Graeme Salaman eds. The International Yearbook of Organization Studies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979, pp.1~30. Zandstra, Gerald, ‘Enron, board governance and moral failings’ , Corporate Governance 2, February 2002, pp. 16~19. 參、 網路資源 Gourevitch, Peter, the political economy of institutional investors in corporate governance: some comparative problem, unpublished draft, available at Political Research Online, http://www.allacademic.com/one/prol/prol01/index.php?cmd=prol01_search&offset=0&limit=5&multi_search_search_mode=publication&multi_search_publication_fulltext_mod=fulltext&textfield_submit=true&search_module=multi_search&search=Search&search_field=title_idx&fulltext_search=The+Political+Economy+of+Institutional+Investors+in+Corporate+Governance Ribstein, Larry E., Market vs. Regulatory Responses to Corporate Fraud: A Critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, at 68, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=332681, visited on April 27, 2008. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41577 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 一般探討安隆弊案的文獻都採右派的立場，以不討論生產體制本身之合理性為前提來分析安隆風暴。它們只在資本主義制度中來看制度改革，來談監督，但這種方式卻忽略安隆風暴體現資本主義的結構缺陷，因此，是不是該站在不同的角度來審視資本主義才更能看清事情真相，也才能進行更好的改革。是故本篇論文將擺脫特定人物或某部分制度的範圍，從較宏觀的角度來分析安隆風暴，在結構層面和各種局部功能性作品之間做適當的連結，最後試圖歸納出能適當解釋安隆事件的邏輯。
從生產方式來看，處於資本主義生產方式之下的安隆反映出資本主義的基本性質。為了公司的生存，安隆必須追求利潤；當作為一個生產單位但工業利潤產出不足之時，它就轉而依賴「金融成長」。當連金融成長都無法達到它的獲利要求時，安隆就必須進行欺騙。因為此時為了生存下去，安隆只好舉債來養債而成為一個實質上在從事「龐式騙局」的組織。當然，龐式騙局最終是要破滅的，安隆的結局就只有倒閉一途。從工業生產漸漸轉到金融投資進而毀滅，正是當代資本主義的演化過程，安隆的發展體現出這個歷程。為了避免步入這種不利於社會的經濟模式，可能的選擇方案可能是凱因斯主義或更基進也更能真的解決問題的社會主義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the arena of political economy, most works employ the Right stance to analyze the Enron scandal. Therefore, they focus on the subjects such as corporate governance and legislation reform but don’t inspect the flaws in our modern producing system. This kind of methods, however, neglect the fact that Enron scandal had embodied defects in capitalist system and turned out to be a disaster to social life. In order to avoid this limitation and to get a better realization of the Enron scandal in a more comprehensive social context, this thesis employs a leftist stance.
Enron which is locating in the capitalist producing system must reflect the basic attribute of capitalism. Specifically, for the sake of corporation’s existence, Enron have to struggle to earn the profits. When its industry profit cannot satisfy the growth requirement, Enron turn to rely on financial accumulation. But financial investment is a highly risky business; there is no guarantee to get profit from financial investment. When the bad fortune does happen, the existence of company would be at stake. If a corporation faces such a plight, the only way to live longer is to cheat. These transformation stages are exactly what Enron had experienced. And the final ending for Enron is to go bankrupt. In order to avoid this disastrous pattern of economic development, the available alternative might be bring the Keynesian economics back in; or, in a leftist point of view, a more radical way of doing this is to totally change the producing system from capitalism to socialism, which would produce according to need without breaking the economic equilibrium. Then the goal of creating a stable social order can be achieved. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:23:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R93322019-1.pdf: 1103998 bytes, checksum: eb91635385b021000603a3b88c9cea75 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………… i 中文摘要……………………………………………………………… ii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………… iii 第一章 緒論……………………………..………………………….. 1 第一節 研究動機與目的…………….………………………… 1 第二節 文獻回顧………………………………………………. 3 第三節 研究方法………………………………………………. 8 第二節 資本主義的一般理論………………………………… 12 第一節 國家理論……………………………………………… 12 第二節 工業資本與金融資本的關係及兩種利潤的性質…… 27 第三節 小結…………………………………………………… 42 第三章 安隆風暴的社會歷史背景………………………………... 44 第一節 國際經濟環境………………………………………... 44 第二節 國內經濟環境………………………………………... 52 第三節 小結…………………………………………………... 62 第四章 安隆作為一個生產單位………...………………………… 64 第一節 天然氣與石油事業…………………………………... 64 第二節 電力及寬頻事業……………………………………... 70 第三節 安隆國際……………………………………………... 76 第四節 小結…………………………………………………... 85 第五章 安隆作為貿易與金融組織………………………………... 87 第一節 交易與金融的關係…………………………………... 87 第二節 脆弱的金融投資公司………………………………... 98 第六章 結論………………………………………………………... 106 參考文獻………………………………………………………….…. 111 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 金融資本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資本主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 金融化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 安隆 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治經濟學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 馬克思主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Enron | en |
| dc.subject | capitalism | en |
| dc.subject | financial capital | en |
| dc.subject | financialization | en |
| dc.subject | political economy | en |
| dc.subject | Marxism | en |
| dc.title | 安隆風暴的政治經濟分析：一個左派的觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Political Economy Analysis of Enron: A Leftist Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 孫善豪(Shan-Hao Sun) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃德北,左正東 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資本主義,金融資本,金融化,政治經濟學,馬克思主義,安隆, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | capitalism,financial capital,financialization,political economy,Marxism,Enron, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 120 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-01-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。