請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41411完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林建甫 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jeng-Shan Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周正山 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:18:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-03-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李崇主(1997),《台灣地區股價、匯率與外資關聯性之研究》,國立中興大學金業管理研究所碩士論文。
徐千婷(2005),「台灣的匯率管理與匯率反應函數-兼論新加坡的匯率政策」,《中央銀行季刊》,27:3,79-96。 徐魁君(2002),《外資、匯率、利率與臺灣股價關聯及波動性之研究-GARCH -VEC模型之應用》,國立臺北大學合作經濟學研究所碩士論文。 許瓊瑛(1998),《匯率與資本移動間共整合關係之研究一台灣實證分析》,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 陳旭昇(2007),《時間序列分析-總體經濟與財務金融之應用》,台北,東華書局。 陳旭昇、吳聰敏(2008),「台灣匯率制度初探」,《經濟論文叢刊》,36:2,147-181。 彭德偉(2001),《資本移動、匯率與貨幣政策一台灣之實證研究》,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 馬千惠(2001),「資本管制與資本移動關係的再探討」,《中央銀行季刊》,23:1,63-93。 楊雅惠與許嘉棟(2005),「新臺幣匯率與央行干預行為」,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》,35:2,23-41。 蔡振旭(2003),《新台幣對美元匯率報酬變動行為分析》,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所項士論文。 蔡美珠(2004),《匯率與資本移動長期關係之研究及短期衝擊反應-台灣實證分析》,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 劉節慈(2003),「亞洲主要國家外資管理制度簡介」,《證券暨期貨月刊》,21:12,1-13。 Almekinders, Geert J., and Sylvester C.W. Eijffinger (1991), “Empirical Evidence on Foreign Exchange Market Intervention: Where Do We Stand?' Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Heft 4, 645-77. Ball, Laurence (1999), “Policy Rules for Open Economies', in: Taylor, John B. (ed), Monetary Policy Rules, University of Chicago Press. Becketti, Sean, and Gordon H. Sellon, Jr. (1989), “Has Financial market Volatility Increased?', Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review, June, 17-30. Belongia, M.T. (1992), “Foreign Exchange Intervention by the United States: A Review and Assessment of 1985-89', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, May-June, 32-51. Bergin, Paul R. (2004), “Measuring the Costs of Exchange Rate Volatility', FRBSF Economic Letter, 2004-22. Bergin, Paul R. and Ivan Tchakarov (2003), “Does Exchange Rate Risk Matter for Welfare?'NBER Working Paper #9900. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9900 Bonser-Neal, Catherine (1996), “Does Central Bank Intervention Stabilize Foreign Exchange Rates?', Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 81:1, 43-57. Calvo, Guillermo A. and Carmen M. Reinhart (2000), “Fear of Floating', NBER Working Paper No. 7993. Canales-Kriljenko, Jorge Ivan, Roberto Guimaraes, Shogo Ishii, and Cem Karacadag (2003), “Riding the Tiger', Finance and Development, 40:3, 28-31. Coes, D.V. (1989), “Real Exchange Rates: Definition, Measurement and Trendsin France, West Germany, Italy and the UK', in D.Hodgman and G. Wood (eds.), Macroeconomic Policy and Economic Interdependence, Macmillan, London. Dahl, Christian. M. and Melody. Lo (2005), “Assessing Exchange Rate Pass-Through: A New Empirical Approach', Manuscript, Purdue University. Devereux, Michael B. and Charles Engel (2003), “Monetary Policy in the Open Economy Revisited: Price Setting and Exchange-Rate Flexibility', Review of Economic Studies 70, 765-783. Dominguez, Kathryn (2003), “The Market Microstructure of Central Bank Intervention', Journal of International Economics 59(1), 25-45. Edison, H.J. (1993), “The Effectiveness of Central-Bank Intervention: A Survey of the Literature after 1982', Special Papers on International Economics 18, Princeton University. Friedman, Milton(1953), “The case for flexible exange rates', in Milton Friedman(ed.), Essays in Positive Economics, 157-203, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kearns, Jonathan, and Roberto Rigobon (2005), “Identifying the Efficacy of Central Bank Interventions: Evidence from Australia and Japan', Journal of International Economics, 66, 31-48. Khor, H.E., E. Robinson, and J. Lee (2004), “Managed Floating Intermediate Exchange Systems: The Singapore Experience', MAS Staff Paper No. 37. Kroner, K.F. and W.D.Lastrapes (1993), “The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on International Trade: Reduced Form Estimates Using GARCH-in-mean Model', Journal of International Money and Finance,12, 298-318. Murrey, John, Mark Zelmer, and Des McManus (1997), “The Effect of Intervention on Canadian Dollar Volatility', Conference on Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy, Summer, Bank of Canada. Neely, Christopher J. (2001), “The Practice of Central Bank Intervention: Looking Under the Hood', Review- Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May/June, 1-10. Nelson, D. B.(1991), “Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach”, Econometrica, 59(2), 347-370. Nelson, D. B. and Cao, C. Q. (1992). “Inequality constraints in the univariate GARCH model”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 229-235. Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth Rogoff (1998), “Risk and Exchange Rates', NBER Working Paper #6694. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w6694 Sarno, Lucio and Taylar, Mark P. (2001), “Official intervention in the foreign exchange market: Is it effective and if so how does it work”, Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 839-868. Scheibe, J. (2002), “Middle Way Exchange Rate Regimes-the Case of Singapore', M.Phil Thesis. Stiglitz, Joseph (2005), “American Must Put Its House in Order before Lecturing China', Financial Times, July 27. Viaene, J.M. and C.G. Vries (1992), “International Trade and Exchange Rate Volatility', European Economic Review, 36, 1311-21. Warner, D. and M. Kreinin (1983), “Determinants of International Trade Flows', Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 96-104. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41411 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近來政府規劃打造臺灣成為「亞太資產管理中心」,如果吸引海外資金回臺策略奏效,吸引大量海外資金回臺將對新台幣匯率穩定產生衝擊,而此時中央銀行的管理操作能力即相當關鍵。我國在2003年10月取消QFII制度,外匯交易量大增。然而過去並未見到針對此一外資管理制度重大變革對匯率波動性所造成影響的相關研究。本研究希望就取消QFII制度對於匯率波動幅度的影響和差異進行分析,並對中央銀行外匯管理的效益分析。
本研究採用1999年至2008年之新台幣/美元之匯率資料,以EGARCH和GARCH模型估計QFII制度於2003年10月取消前後的匯率變動率的波動性差異。再者,本文採用外匯未實現損益的估計模型來估算中央銀行同一時期,對於外匯管理的利潤/損失。 研究結果發現,新台幣匯率變動率之時間序列有顯著的波動聚集的現象,也就是存在ARCH效果;而台幣貶值所造成的匯率波動仍比台幣升值所造成的匯率波動大,顯示其有不對稱效果。再者,不論是用EGARCH或GARCH模型,均發現代表QFII制度取消的虛擬變數其係數估計值顯著為負,表示2003年10月QFII制度取消後,匯率波動顯著下降。亦即QFII制度取消,雖然使得外資可以自由投入國內資本市場,並造成外匯市場交易量大增,但是其對於匯率波動幅度卻反而是下降。同時,本文也發現在QFII匯率取消後,中央銀行藉由國內外利差結構累積大量的隱含收益。 綜上,QFII制度取消後,外匯交易量大增,但新台幣匯率波動幅度下降,中央銀行在外匯操作上亦未受損失。因此,政府於研擬提升金融機構資產管理業務及促進金融國際化之政策時,可減少對於外匯波動的疑慮,而採取較為積極的態度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The government recently plans to build Taiwan as Asian Asset Management Center. Attracting the overseas funds to invest in Taiwan is the cornerstone to develop asset management. If this strategy works, there will be huge amount of overseas funds flowing into Taiwan and will cause great impact on the NTD foreign exchange rate volatility, then the capability of the central bank to stabilize the NTD foreign exchange rate is very crucial. QFII was abolished in 2003 October that caused a large number of foreign exchange trading volume. However, there is no previous study focused on analyzing the influence of the reform of foreign funds management system on the NTD foreign exchange rate volatility. This thesis aims to investigate the difference on the NTD foreign exchange rate volatility between before and after the abolishment of QFII and estimate the capability of central bank in the foreign exchange market during the same period.
This thesis uses the data of NTD/USD foreign exchange rate from 1999 to 2008 to analyze the difference in the NTD foreign exchange rate volatility before and after the abolishment of QFII by EGARCH and GARCH models. In addition, this thesis also estimates the profitability of central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market during the same period. The results illustrate that the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate reveals significant clustering property, known as “ARCH effect”. The existence of significant asymmetric effect of the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate shows that the impacts on the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate affected by bad news (depreciation) are larger than the same magnitude of good news (appreciation). Furthermore, the estimates of QFII abolishment dummy variable are both significantly negative in EGARCH and GARCH models. The abolishment of QFII enables foreign investors to invest in Taiwan capital market which causes the trade volume of NTD foreign exchange increased. However, it did not aggravate the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate after the abolishment of QFII in 2003 October. Moreover, this thesis also found a huge unrealized profit from official intervention during the same period in 1999–2008. After the abolishment of QFII in 2003 October, the trade volume of NTD foreign exchange increased while the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate decreased. In the same time, the central bank did not have losses in foreign exchange market. It dispels the doubts about the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate when the government frames the policies and measures to boost asset management and to enhance the globalization of Taiwan financial industry. The government could have more positive attitude toward that. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:18:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-P95323013-1.pdf: 1217969 bytes, checksum: 3f92c9bf54261a2ad3d1173063167c13 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究背景 2 第三節 研究問題與貢獻 6 第四節 研究架構與流程 8 第二章 文獻探討 10 第一節 台灣對外資管理政策演變 10 第二節 我國外匯管理制度之演進 13 第三節 外匯干預之必要性探討 17 第四節 國內匯率波動與外資關係實證研究 20 第五節 指數型自我迴歸條件變異數模型(EGARCH)的性質 22 第六節 小結 24 第三章 QFII制度取消前後匯率波動比較實證研究 26 第一節 資料來源與說明 26 第二節 資料的處理與分析 27 第三節 實證模型的設定 33 第四節 實證結果 36 第五節 小結 41 第四章 外匯管理的效益分析與政策意涵 42 第一節 外匯管理的成本效益 42 第二節 研究發現對我國金融政策的意涵 45 第三節 小結 48 第五章 結論與建議 49 第一節 結論 49 第二節 研究限制與政策建議 50 參考文獻 52 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 外匯管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新台幣匯率波動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | EGARCH模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | GARCH模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 合格境外機構投資者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | GARCH model | en |
| dc.subject | foreign exchange management | en |
| dc.subject | QFII | en |
| dc.subject | the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate | en |
| dc.subject | EGARCH model | en |
| dc.title | QFII制度取消前後匯率波動與管理效益分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Analysis of the NTD Foreign Exchange Rate Volatility and the Profitability of Foreign Exchange Management before and after the Abolishment of QFII | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉銀華,李顯峰,吳中書 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 新台幣匯率波動,EGARCH模型,GARCH模型,合格境外機構投資者,外匯管理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | the volatility of NTD foreign exchange rate,EGARCH model,GARCH model,QFII,foreign exchange management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 55 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-03-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
