Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41267
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林以正
dc.contributor.authorYi-Chen Leeen
dc.contributor.author李怡真zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T00:15:00Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-30
dc.date.copyright2009-06-30
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-06-23
dc.identifier.citationAndrews, F. M., & Robinson, J. P. (1991). Measures of subjective well-being. In J. P. Robinson, P. Shaver, and L. Wrightsman (Eds.) Measures of social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Andrews, F.M., & Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.
Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. InJ.P.Forgas, & J.M.Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: an international perspective (pp. 189-203). North-Holland: Elsevier.
Baltes, P. B., Smith, J., & Staudinger, U. M. (1992). Wisdom and successful aging. In T. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 39, pp. 123-167). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., Millar, N., & White, J. (1995). Selective processing of negative information: Effects of clinical anxiety, concurrent depression, and awareness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 532-536.
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., White, J., Groom, C., & Bono, J. (1999). Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 267-278.
Brosch, T., Sander, D., Pourtois, G., & Scherer, K. R. (2008). Beyond fear: Rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli. Psychological Science, 19, 362-370.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D.(1960). A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The Ecology of Adolescent Activities and Experiences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281-294.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M.A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128-1139.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851-864.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1984). Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 871-883.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.). Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective. (pp. 119-139). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Measuring subjective well-being to compare the quality of life of cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. (pp. 3-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, E. & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress, Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25-41.
Diener, E., Suh, E., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7–32.
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove, England: Psychological Press.
Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327–343.
Fisher, P. L., & Wells, A. (2009). Psychological models of worry and generalized anxiety disorder. In Antony, M. and Stein, M. (Eds.) Oxford handbook of anxiety and related disorders (pp. 225-237). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fredrickson B. L., & Losada M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678-686.
Gilbert, P., & Allan, S. (1998). The role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: An exploration of an evolutionary view. Psychological Medicine, 28, 585–598.
Goodman, L.A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148-170.
Guoqing, Z. & Veenhoven, R. (2008). Ancient Chinese philosophical advice: Can it help us find happiness today? Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 425-443.
Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 723-727.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739.
Higgins, E. T., Grant, H., & Shah, J. (1999). Self-regulation and quality of life: Emotional and non-emotional life experiences. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.) Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 244-266). New York: Russell Sage foundation.
Hu, L., & Bentler, O. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Coventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Individual differences in emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 351–372). New York: Guilford Press.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Gilford Press.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
Kohn, L. (2001). Daoism and Chinese culture. Cambridge, MA: Three Pines Press.
Larsen, R. J. (2000). Toward a science of mood regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11,129-141.
Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Problems and promises with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 25-59.
Larsen, R. J. & Kasimatis, M. (1991). Day-to-day physical symptoms: Individual differences in the occurrence, duration, and emotional concomitants of minor daily illnesses. Journal of Personality, 59, 387-423.
Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132-140.
Liao, L. Y. (2000). The new scale of social desirability responding in Taiwan and psychological process analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Little, T. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5, 51-79.
Lu, L., & Shih, J. B.(1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach, Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 181–187.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452-468.
Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 455-468.
Mathews, A., May, J., Mogg, K., & Eysenck, M. (1990). Attentional bias in anxiety: selective search or defective filtering? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 166-173.
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 179-204.
Mitchell, D. W. (2002). Buddhism: introducing the Buddhist experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, S. (1988). Tao te ching. New York: HarperCollins.
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Bono, J., & Painter, M. (1997). Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 297-303.
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Williams, R., & Mathews, A. (1993). Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 304-311.
Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Weinman, J. (1989). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: a replication. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 317-323.
Niedenthal, P. M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Self-conscious emotions. In P.M. Niedenthal, S. Krauth-Gruber, & F. Ric (Eds.), Psychology of emotion (pp. 77-114). New York: Psychology Press.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. En D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.330-350). New York: Russell Sage foundation.
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Toward a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29-50.
Oishi, S. (2001). Culture and memory for emotional experiences: On-line vs. retrospective judgment of subjective well-being (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 5625.
Okazaki, S. (2000). Asian American and White American differences on affective distress symptoms: Do symptom reports differ across reporting methods? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 603-625.
Peterson, C. (1999). Personal control and well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz(Eds.) Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 288-301). New York: Russell Sage foundation.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event sampling and other methods for studying daily experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30.
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493-502.
Rusting, C. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 165-196.
Rusting, C. L., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607-612.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Ryff, R. M. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). PaloAlto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Neale, J. M., Shiffman, S., Marco, C. A., Hickcox, M., Paty, J., Porter, L. S., & Cruise, L. J. (1998). A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1670-1680.
Suh, E.M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 1378-1391.
Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288-307.
Vandenberg, R. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139-158.
Wallace, B., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental Balance and Well-Being: Building Bridges Between Buddhism and Western Psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 690-701.
Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford Press.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience negative affective states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Watson. D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
Whiteside-Mansell, L. & Corwyn, R. F. (2003). Mean and covariance structures analyses: An examination of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among adolescents and adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 163-173.
Williams, M. A., Moss, S. A., Bradshaw, J. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 12, 29-50.
Wong, Y. H., & Leung, T. K. (2001). Guanxi: relationship marketing in a Chinese context. NewYork: Haworth Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41267-
dc.description.abstract基於主觀幸福感構念中所定義的情感幸福,乃是依循享樂主義取向的幸福觀所設計,強調個體存在正向情感而不存在負向情感。這個定義僅強調了一般正向情感的重要性(例如:快樂、興奮),卻未能反映華人文化所偏好的幸福感。對此,本研究提出了安適幸福感的構念,以描述此一華人文化所偏好的情感幸福,並將安適幸福感定義為個體經驗到一種內在的平靜與安適。在本研究中,研究者設計了五個子研究,目的在發展可以合理評量安適幸福感的測量工具,以及探索安適幸福感的情緒調控機制。研究一至三除了發展安適幸福感量表(研究一)並建立其信效度指標外(研究二),亦透過比較東西方個體於安適幸福感量表上的得分以作為安適幸福感量表的建構效度檢驗(研究三)。而研究四、五則分別透過經驗取樣(研究四)以及認知取向的Flanker典範(研究五),以探索個體達成內在安適的情緒調控機制。本研究結果發現,安適幸福感量表除了具備良好的信效度外,也透過發現台灣人在該量表上的得分顯著高於歐裔美國人,顯示該量表能反映東方文化特殊性。此外,安適幸福感量表得分較高者相較於得分較低者,傾向上日常生活中經驗到較少的情感變動,也較不容易被正負向刺激干擾,此結果進一步展現了個體會以不同於追求單純享樂情緒的方式來達成內在安適的幸福。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe affective component of subjective well-being has mostly been defined as the presence of positive affect and the absence of negative affect. This definition emphasizes the importance of hedonic pleasure but fails to include the affect valued in Chinese culture. The present study developed the construct of peace of mind to describe the affective well-being valued in Chinese culture. Peace of mind was defined as an internal state of peacefulness and harmony. To develop a measure to assess peace of mind and explore the affect regulation mechanisms for achieving peace of mind, five studies were conducted. Studies 1 to 3 were designed to develop the Peace of Mind Scale (POMS) (Study 1) and to establish its validity as an affective well-being measure (Study 2) on which individuals from Chinese culture should score higher than those from Western cultures (Study 3). Studies 4 and 5 were designed to explore the affect-regulation mechanisms for achieving peace of mind using diverse methods, including an experience sampling method (Study 4) and a flanker task (Study 5). The results indicate that the POMS has good reliability and validity for measuring affective well-being. The cross-cultural validation also found that Taiwanese individuals scored higher on the POMS than European Americans. The results of Study 4 show that people with higher peace of mind tend to experience less affective fluctuation in their daily lives. Furthermore, the results of Study 5 indicate that people with high peace of mind are less likely to be distracted by both negative and positive stimuli.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:15:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-D92227010-1.pdf: 885394 bytes, checksum: 7f7ae63ac5fe5b0a136b7702ab3680fc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1. Introduction 1
Measurement Issues in Cross-cultural Studies of Affective Well-being 2
Affective Well-being in East Asian Cultures 7
Affect Regulation and Peace of Mind 12
Overview of the Present Work 19
Chapter 2. Affective Well-being in the Chinese Culture 21
Pilot Study: The Affective Well-being in Chinese People 21
Method 23
Results 25
Discussion 26
Chapter 3. The Development of the Peace of Mind Scale 29
Study 1: Development of the Peace of Mind Scale 29
Method 30
Results 31
Study 2: Validation of the Peace of Mind Scale 33
Method 36
Results 40
Discussion 44
Study 3: Cross-cultural validation of the Peace of Mind Scale 46
Method 47
Results 49
Discussion 55
Chapter 4. Affect Regulation of Achieving Peace of Mind 59
Study 4: Daily Affective Experiences of People with Peace of Mind 59
Method 62
Results 66
Discussion 73
Study 5: Attentional Bias of People with Peace of Mind 77
Method 78
Results 80
Discussion 83
Chapter 5. General Discussion and Conclusion 87
Peace of Mind Differs From Hedonic Happiness 90
Peace of Mind is More Than Low-Arousal Positive Affect 91
Cultural Specificity and Universality of the Peace of Mind Scale 93
The Affect-regulation Mechanisms of Achieving Peace of Mind 95
Conclusion 96
References 99
Appendix 109
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject經驗取樣zh_TW
dc.subject情緒調控zh_TW
dc.subject快樂zh_TW
dc.subject幸福感zh_TW
dc.subject安適zh_TW
dc.subject注意力偏向zh_TW
dc.subjectattentional biasen
dc.subjectESMen
dc.subjectaffect regulationen
dc.subjecthappinessen
dc.subjectwell-beingen
dc.subjectpeace of minden
dc.title安適幸福感的構念發展與情緒調控機制之探討zh_TW
dc.titlePeace of Mind: Construct, Measurement, and Affect-regulation Mechanismsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王叢桂,朱瑞玲,姚開屏,陸洛,楊中芳
dc.subject.keyword安適,幸福感,快樂,情緒調控,經驗取樣,注意力偏向,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordpeace of mind,well-being,happiness,affect regulation,ESM,attentional bias,en
dc.relation.page121
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-06-23
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
864.64 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved