請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41081
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江文瑜(Wen-yu Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-jung Ho | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何佳容 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T17:15:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
Beckman, Mary E. 1986. Stress and Non-stress Accent. Netherlands Phonetic Archives 7. Dordrecht: Foris. Blust, Robert. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Elizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-kuei Li, eds. Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 31-94. Symposium Series of the Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), No.1. Taipei: Academia Sinica. Bolinger, D.L. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word, 14:109-49. Bolinger, D.L. 1978. Intonation across languages. In Universals of human language, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Vol II: Phonology, 471–524. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Bonotis, Antonis, Bannert R., Fourakis M. and Pagoni-Tetlow S. 2002. Crosslinguistic segmental durations and prosodic typology. International Conference of Speech Prosody. Aix-en Provence, French: 183-6 Botinis Antonis, Marios Christofi, Charalabos Themistocleous and Aggeliki kyprianou. 2004. Duration correlates of stop consonants in Cypriot Greek. In Proceedings, FONETIK 2004, Dept. of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Bradley, T. 2001. The phonetics and phonology of rhotic duration contrast and neutralization. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. Bruce, Gosta. 1977. Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup. Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Catford, J. C. 1988. A Practical Introduction to Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chen M. 1970. Vowel length variation and as a function of voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22: 129-59. Cho Taehong, Sun Ah Jun, and P. Ladefoged. 2000. The vowels of Cheju. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 98:81-94 Chiang, Fang-mei. 2005. The Study of Prosody in Saisiyat. Taipei: National Taiwan University, MA Thesis. Chiang, Wen-yu and Fang-mei Chiang. 2005. Saisiyat as a pitch accent language: Evidence from acoustic study of words. Oceanic Linguistics 44: 404-26. Chiang, Wen-yu and Fang-mei Chiang. 2005. Vowel dispersion in Truku. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 31.1: 21-45. Chiang, Wen-yu, I Chang-Liao and Fang-mei Chiang. 2006. The prosodic realization of negation in Saisiyat and English. Oceanic Linguistics 45: 110-32. Cruttenden, Alan. 1981. Falls and rises: meanings and universals. Journal of Linguistics 17, 77–91. Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation.(2nd Edn). New York: Cambridge University Press. Danesi, Marcel. 1985. Loanwords and phonological methodology. Ville Lasalle, Que.: Didier. Davis, Stuard and Hyunsook Kang. 2003. On the two phonetic mismatches in the borrowings of English words into Korean. Paper presented at the Midcontinental Workshop on Phonology, University of Illiois, Urbana, October 2003. D'Imperio, Mariapaola and Sam Rosenthall. 1999. Phonetics and phonology of main stress in Italian. Phonology 16: 1-28. Duanmu, San. 1994. Against contour tone units. Linguistic Inquiry 25.4: 555-608. Face, Timothy L. 2001. Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation. Probus, 13, 2: 223-246. Feuillet, Jack. 1994. Typology of global interrogation. Travaux linguistiques du CERLICO, 7: 7-33. Fourakis, Marios, Antonis Botinis, and Maria Katsaiti. 1999. Acoustic characteristics of Greek vowels. Phonetica 56: 28-43. Fry, D.B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. LgSp. 1:126-52. Gordon Matthew. 2004. A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics 70:1-32. Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Inotnation. Cambridge: ambridge University Press. Hamann, Silke. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. Utrecht: LOT. Haudricourt, Andre Georges. 1954. Les origins asiatiques des langues nalayo-polynesiennes. JSO 10:180-83. Hedberg, Nancy and Juan M. Sosa. 2003. 'Pitch Contours in Negative Sentences.' Poster presented at the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spaina, Aug. 3-9. Ho, Chia-jung and Wen-yu Chiang. 2006. The Study of phonetics-phonology interaction in the vowel inventory of Kavalan. Paper presented at AFLA XIII, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-chu, Taiwan, Mar. 24-26. House, A. S. 1961. On vowel duration in English. JASA 33: 1174-78. House, J. Daniel. 1989. Syllable structure constraints on F0 timing. Poster presentation, Second Conference of Laboratory Phonology, Edinburgh. Jacobs, Haike and Carlos Gussenhoven. 2000. Loan phonology: Perception, salience, the lexicon and OT. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition, ed. By Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer, 193-210. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johan Liljencrants and Bjorn Lindblom. 1972. Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast. Language 48-4: 839-62. Jennifer L. Smith. 2005. Loan phonology is not all perception: Evidence from Japanese loan doublets. To appear in Japanese/Korean Linguistics 14, ed. by Timothy J. Vance. Stanford: CSLI. Jessen, Michael. 1996. The relevance of phonetic reality for underlying phonological representation: the case of tense vs. lax obstruents in German. In U. Kleinhenz (ed.) Interfaces in Phonology. (Studia Grammatica 41). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Jessen, Michael. 1998. Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Jones, Daniel. 1957. An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge, Mass.: Heffer. Kenstowicz, Michael. 2001. The role of perception in loanword phonology: A review of Les emprunts linguistiques d’origine europenne en fon by Flavien Gbeto . To appear in Linguistique Africaine. Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA. LaCharite Darlene and Carole Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity vervus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36-2: 223-58. Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge (New York): Cambridge University Press. Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. (3rd edition). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. Laksman, Myma. 1988. Accent in Indonesian. Bulletin de I ‘Institut de Phonetique de Grenoble, 17: 217-35. Lindblom. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. Experimental Phonology. ed. by John J. Ohala and Jeri J. Jaeger, 13-44. Orlando: Academic Press. Lindström, Eva and B. Remijsen. 2005. Aspects of the prosody of Kuot, a language where intonation ignores stress. Linguistics 43-4: 839-70. Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 2006. The Internal Relationships of Formosan Languages. Presented in 10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics 17-20 January 2006. Palawan, Philippines. Liu, Ta-yu. 2002. Stress in the Intonation of Eastern Coast Amis. Taipei: National Taiwan University, MA Thesis. Maddieson, Ian. 2004. Timing and alignment: A case study of Lai. Language and Linguistics 5.4: 729-55. Majors, Tivoli. 2005. Low back vowel merger in Missouri speech: Acoustics description and explanation. American Speech 80-2: 165-79. Marios Fourakis, Antonis Botinis and Maria Katsaiti. 1999. Acoustic characteristics of Greek vowels. Phonetica 56: 28-43. Matisoff, James A. 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Consonant types and tone. Southern California Occational Papers in Linguistics, ed. By L.M. Hyman, 71-96. Nardi, Ricardo L. J. 1962. El quichua de Catamarca y La Rioja. Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Folkloricas 3: 189-285. Ohala, John J. 1999. Phonetics in Phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm 4: 105-13. Seoul: Hanshin. Peperkamp, Sharon and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Science, 367-370. Peterson, Gorden E. and H. L. Barney. 1952. Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America: 24, 175–184 Peterson, Gorden E. and Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. JASA 32: 693-703. Pierrehumber, Janet and Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Rajka Smiljanic. 2001. Pitch peak alignment as a function of lexical and pragmaticfactors in two dialects of Serbian/Croatian. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America -- May 1, 2001 -- Volume 109, Issue 5, p. 2414. Shen, Wen-chi. 2008. A Study of Some Syntactic Constructions in Sakizaya. Taipei: National Taiwan University, MA Thesis. Siverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9: 289-328. Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1996. Historical linguistics. London; New York: Arnold; New York: Distributed in the USA by St. Martin's Press. Tsukida, Naomi. 1993. A brief sketch of the Sakizaya dialect of Amis. Tokyo University Linguistics Papers 13:372-413. Ulrich, Charles. 1997. Loanword adaptation in Lama: Testing the TCRS model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 42: 415-63. Ultan, Russell. 1978. Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. In J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson and E.A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 4. Standford: Standford University Press. Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1995. Phonetic Explanations for Cross-Linguistic Prosodic Similarities. Phonetica 52, 123–30. Willem J. de Reuse. 1986. The lexicalization of sound symbolism in Santiago del Estero Quecha. International Journal of American Linguistics 52 (1): 54-64. Wu, Joy, Jing-lan. 2006. Verb Classification, Case Marking and Grammatical Relationships in Amis. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo PhD dissertation. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 1985. Intonational prominence on negatives in English. Language and Speech 28: 197-230. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 2002. Register and prosodic variation: A cross language comparison. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1495-1536. Yeh, Shih-chi. 2003. Syllabification and Reduplication in Amis. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University, MA Thesis. Yeou, Mohamed, Mohamed Embarki, Sallal Al Maqtari, and Christelle Dodane. 2007. F0 alignment patterns in Arabic dialects. Proceedings of the 16th ICPhS, 1493-96. Yip, Moira. 1993. Cantonese loanword phonology and Optimality Theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 261-91. Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 1997. Features, Gestures, and Igbo Vowels: An Approach to the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. Language, Vol. 73, No. 2: 227-74. 黃宣衛、蘇羿如 2007 「歷史記憶、文化建構與一個新族群的誕生—談Sakizaya人的正名運動及其火神祭」。 南島民族的分類與擴散—「文化與族群的形成與再創造」分支計畫,子計畫第二年期中workshop。 江文瑜 1995 「太魯閣語、排灣語、阿美語、泰雅語疑問句語調與音韻結構交流之分析」。 國科會計畫報告。 江文瑜 1996 「賽德克語、排灣語、阿美語、泰雅語疑問句語調與音韻結構交流之分析」。 國科會計畫報告。 張永利 2000 《噶瑪蘭語參考語法》,台北:遠流。 吳靜蘭 2000 《阿美語參考語法》,台北:遠流。 《原住民族語言書寫系統》2005,原民會。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41081 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文著重於撒奇萊雅語的母音系統、重音節以及句子語調的音韻和語音交流研究。過去撒奇萊雅語的研究甚少,除了基本句型和音韻介紹外,甚少有更近一步的研究。本論文的重要性在於提供了撒奇萊雅語音韻的完整描述,並嘗試用聲學的觀點來驗證其音韻系統。
在這篇研究中,我們提供三種方法來驗證/o/在撒奇萊雅語為一獨立音素,而非僅是 /u/ 的同位音。三種方法分別為:第一,利用聲學中母音共振峰來找出/u/和/o/的共振峰範圍,根據這一範圍,進而將聽覺上認為是/o/的音歸類,結果發現仍有包含/o/的字。第二,利用近似最小變異組來分辨,我們從兩位發音人中找到各一組 /u/和/o/的近似最小變異組,這也顯示兩個音所能出現的音韻環境相同,它們的分布則是不可預測的,所以應被視為不同的音素;第三,根據撒奇萊雅語的日文借字中顯示,大量的日文中的/o/仍被保留,這顯示/o/有可能已經內化成一獨立音素。 第二部份探討撒奇萊雅語的重音節研究,我們參考江和江(2006)在賽夏語重音節研究中的六種參數來找出字重音的聲學特質,這六種參數包括:基礎頻率值、音調異動範圍、基頻最高點排列、斜率、時間長度以及音量強度。結果發現在撒奇萊雅語中,基礎頻率的數值在重音節中最高,音調異動範圍也較非重音節大。 第三部份提供撒奇萊雅語的基本語調描述,包含四種不同的句型:直述句、否定句、是非問句以及疑問詞問句。我們發現,直述句的結尾大多以降調為主;否定句中,否定詞常是整個句子中基礎頻率最高的部份;是非問句中,位於表是非問句句末的標記符號haw大多先以低聲調而後加上一個升調來突顯基礎頻率的對比,因而較容易吸引到聽者的注意;疑問詞問句中,位於句首的疑問詞常在句子中帶有較高的基頻,而句子的結尾大多以降調為主。 本論文對於撒奇萊雅語的母音系統、重音節和句子語調做了一個深度的探討,也對於音韻和語音的交流研究提供了一些理論方法,最後希望這樣的研究方式能對未來撒奇萊雅語音韻和語音的進階研究有所貢獻。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis is the first study investigating the interface between phonology and phonetics in Sakizaya. Three aspects are mainly discussed in this thesis. The first study is focused on the controversial issue that whether /o/ is a phoneme in Sakizaya or not. The second study is about acoustic parameters which can contrast accent from non-accent. The final study aims to provide basic sentential intonation, including four different sentence types. The significance of this current thesis lies in providing not only a thorough sketch of the phonology in Sakizaya but also a theoretical contribution to the interface between phonology and phonetics.
Traditionally, [o] is considered an allophone of /u/ which occurs adjacently to glottal stop or pharyngeal fricative in Sakizaya. We conducted three different methods to support our proposal that/o/ is a separate phoneme in Sakizaya. The first one is to use phonetic analysis to delimit the vowel formant ranges of [u] and allophonic [o] and then we categorize the vowels which perceptually sound like [o]’s according to the vowel formant ranges. We found some words containing /o/ which is not an allophonic [o]. The second method is to find near-minimal pairs. Since two sounds can occur in the same phonological environment, their occurrences are unpredictable, they should be regarded as separate phonemes. In our investigation, we found one near-minimal pair from two of our speakers, respectively. The third method is to use loanword adaptation to propose that /o/ might be internalized in Sakizaya people’s lexicon. Due to repeated inputs of Japanese loanwords containing /o/, /o/ might be acquired and become a new phoneme in Sakizaya. The second study investigates the acoustic parameters which can contrast accent from non-accent in Sakizaya. Six parameters include F0 height, pitch range, F0 peak alignment, slope, duration and intensity. We found that among the six parameters F0 height and pitch range are main factors that can distinguish accent from non-accent. The final study provides a description of intonation in Sakizaya, including declarative, negation, yes-no question and question-word sentences. Declarative sentences end with a falling pitch. Negators are usually the most prominent item in pitch in negation sentences. Yes-no question sentences has a low-high contrast on the final grammatical marker “haw” at the end of the sentence. Question-word interrogatives end with a falling pitch and question words are usually the most prominent in pitch. In conclusion, this thesis provides a thorough investigation of the interface between phonology and phonetics and contributes to the further study of Sakizaya in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:15:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94142009-1.pdf: 1190266 bytes, checksum: 4fb741c5e577e615c90fd4d0b4e82190 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of contents
致謝詞…………………………………………………………………………………i Chinese abstract……………………………………………………………………….ii English abstract……………………………………………………………………….iii Table of contents……………………………………………………………………...iv List of tables………………………………………………………………………….vii List of figures…………………………………………………………………………ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview of this thesis……………………………………………………….1 1.2 Background Information on Sakizaya………………………………………..4 1.2.1 General background………………………………………………...4 1.2.2 Phonological Information…………………………………………...6 1.2.3 Syntactic Information……………………………………………...12 1.3 Essential contribution……………………………………………………….17 1.4 Organization of the thesis…………………………………………………...17 Notes for Chapter One………………………………………………………………..19 Chapter 2 Literature review 2.1 Previous studies on vowels…………………………………………………20 2.1.1 Vowel formants………………………………………………………21 2.2 Previous studies on accents…………………………………………………22 2.2.1 Classifications of accents……………………………………………22 2.2.2 Parameters of accents………………………………………………..23 2.3 Previous studies on F0 alignment…………………………………………..24 2.4 Previous studies on intonation………………………………………………25 2.4.1 Definition of intonation……………………………………………...25 2.4.2 Intonation of different sentence types……………………………….25 2.5 Loanword adaptation………………………………………………………..27 2.6 Previous studies of the phonology and phonetics interface………………...28 Notes for Chapter Two……………………………………………………………….30 Chapter 3 Vowel identification of Sakizaya vowels /u/ and /o/ 3.1 Investigation 1- Acoustics study……………………………………………32 3.1.1 Method of Investigation 1…………………………………………...32 3.1.2 Result of Investigation 1…………………………………………….36 3.1.3 Discussion of Investigation 1………………………………………..39 3.1.4 Summary of Investigation 1…………………………………………44 3.2 Investigation 2- Phonological study………………………………………...44 3.2.1 Method of Investigation 2…………………………………………...45 3.2.2 Result of Investigation 2…………………………………………….45 3.2.3 Summary of Investigation 2…………………………………………47 3.3 Investigation 3- Loanword adaptation………………………………………47 3.3.1 Method of Investigation 3…………………………………………...48 3.3.2 Results of Investigation 3……………………………………………49 3.3.3 Discussion of Investigation 3………………………………………..50 3.3.4 Summary of Investigation 3…………………………………………51 3.4 Examination of the two hypotheses and conclusion………………………..51 Notes for Chapter Three……………………………………………………………...54 Chapter 4 Acoustic correlates of Sakizaya lexical accent 4.1 Lexical prosody and acoustic correlates in words…………………………..55 4.1.1 Method………………………………………………………………56 4.2 Results………………………………………………………………………59 4.2.1 Four points between accented and pre-accented syllable……………59 4.2.2 Pitch range…………………………………………………………...62 4.2.3 Slope…………………………………………………………………66 4.2.4 F0 peak alignment…………………………………………………...70 4.2.5 Duration……………………………………………………………...72 4.2.6 Intensity……………………………………………………………...76 4.3 Discussion…………………………………………………………………..79 4.3.1 Main parameters in Sakizaya lexical accents………………………..79 4.3.2 Effects of coda upon accented syllables……………………………..80 4.3.3 A comparison with Saisiyat and Kavalan accentual systems………..81 4.4 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………..82 Notes for Chapter Four……………………………………………………………….84 Chapter 5 Basic intonation of different sentence types 5.1 Method of intonation observation……………………………………..85 5.2 Results…………………………………………………………………88 5.2.1 Declarative sentences…………………………………………..88 5.2.2 Negation sentences……………………………………………..92 5.2.3 Yes-no question sentences……………………………………...95 5.2.4 Question-word interrogatives…………………………………100 5.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………………102 Notes for Chapter Five……………………………………………………………...103 Chapter 6 Conclusion 6.1 Concluding remarks………………………………………………….104 6.2 Future research……………………………………………………….106 References…………………………………………………………………………..108 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………113 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 撒奇萊雅語音韻與語音交流研究—母音、重音節、句子語調 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The interaction of phonology and phonetics on Sakizaya: vowels, lexical accent and sentential intonation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 潘荷仙(Ho-hsien Pan),史嘉琳(Karen Steffen Chung) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 撒奇萊雅,音素,母音,重音,語調,音韻學,語音學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Sakizaya,phoneme,vowel,accent,intonation,phonology,phonetics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.16 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。