請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4090完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙儀珊(Yee-San Teoh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | I-An Su | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇怡安 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T09:20:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T09:20:37Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中華民國教育部 (2015)。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。取自：http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cbdic/
民法 (2015年06月10日)。 司法院全球資訊網 (2014)。社工訪視（調查）報告之統一參考指標及格式。取自：https://www.google.com.tw/search?q=%E5%8F%B8%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2+%E7%A4%BE%E5%B7%A5%E8%A8%AA%E8%A6%96%28%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%29%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E4%B9%8B%E7%B5%B1%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%83%E8%80%83%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99%E5%8F%8A%E6%A0%BC%E5%BC%8F&oq=%E5%8F%B8%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2+%E7%A4%BE%E5%B7%A5%E8%A8%AA%E8%A6%96%28%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%29%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E4%B9%8B%E7%B5%B1%E4%B8%80%E5%8F%83%E8%80%83%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99%E5%8F%8A%E6%A0%BC%E5%BC%8F&gs_l=serp.3...10418.11552.0.11751.9.9.0.0.0.0.132.647.8j1.9.0....0...1c.1j4.64.serp..0.0.0.a8oZf0WSiyo 司法院全球資訊網 (2007)。書狀參考範例──少年及家事部分。取自：http://www.judicial.gov.tw/assist/assist03/assist03-02.asp 社會工作師法 (2009年05月27日)。 法務部 (2014)。法院依民法第1055條酌定或改定未成年子女之親權人之參考原則。取自：http://jianlyu.blogspot.tw/2014/02/10551055.html 法官法 (2011年07月06日)。 律師法 (2010年01月27日)。 家事事件法 (2015年12月30日)。 陳鐵君 (2010)。遠流活用中文大辭典。臺北市：智慧藏學習科技股份有限公司。 曾孆瑾、高緻真、蔡明芳 (2009)。從「兒童少年最佳利益」探討社會工作者在間互訪視的多樣性評估指標與困境。臺灣社會工作學刊，7，129-162。 薛波 (2003)。元照英美法詞典。臺北市：元照。 劉宏恩 (2014)。離婚後子女監護案件「子女最佳利益原則」的再檢視：試評析2013年12月修正之民法1055條之1規定。月旦法學，234，193-207。 劉宏恩 (2011)。「子女最佳利益原則」在台灣法院離婚後子女監護案件中之實踐──法律與社會研究(Law and Society Research)之觀點。軍法專刊，57(1)，84-106。 賴芳玉 (2004)。你選爸爸，還是媽媽？。司法改革雜誌，50，44-45。 警察法 (2002年06月12日)。 Acredolo, C., & Horobin, K. (1987). Development of relational reasoning and avoidance of premature closure. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 13-21. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1996). Guidelines for psychosocial evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in young children (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Author. American Psychological Association. (2009). Revised guidelines address child custody evaluations: Practice update. APA Practice Directorate, 6(3) American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association. (1995). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. Family Law Quarterly, 29(1), 51-62. Australian Psychological Society. (2007). APS Code of Ehics. Bottoms, B. L., Quas, L. A., & Davis, S. L. (2007). The influence of interview-provided social support on children’s suggestibility, memory, and disclosures. In M. E. Pipe, M. E., Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp.135-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419-439. Butler, I., Scanlan, L., Robinson, M., Douglas, G., & Murch, M. (2002). Children’s involvement in their parent’s divorce: Implications for practice. Children and Society, 16(2), 89-102. Camparo, L. B, Wagner, J. T, & Saywitz, K. J. (2001). Interviewing children about real and fictitious events: Revisiting the narrative elaboration procedure. Law and Human Behavior, 25(1), 63-80. Carter, C. A., Bottoms, B. L., Levine, M. (1996). Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children’s reports. Law and Human Behavior, 20(3), 335-358. Cartwright, G. F. (1993). Expanding the parameters of parental alienation syndrome. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 21(3), 205-215. Cashmore, J., & Parkinson, P. (2008). Children’s and parent’s perceptions on children’s participation in decision making after parental separation and divorce. Family Court Review, 46(1), 91-104. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403-439. Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children’s memory: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 116, 38-49. Cordon, I. M., Saetermoe, C. L., & Goodman, G. S. (2005). Facilitating children’s accurate responses: Conversational rules and interview style. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 249-266. Crosby-Currie, C. (1996). Children’s involvement in contested custody cases: Practices and experiences of legal and mental health professionals. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 195-207. Crossman, A., Powell, M. B., Principe, G., & Ceci, S. (2002). Child testimony in custody cases: A review. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2(1), 1-32. Dorado, J. S., & Saywitz, K. J. (2001). Interviewing preschoolers from low- and middle- SES communities: A test of the narrative elaboration recall improvement technique. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(4), 568-580. Everson, M. D., & Boat, B. W. (1990). Sexualized doll play among young children: Implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(5), 736–742. Everson, M. D., & Boat, B. W. (1994). Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18(2), 113-129. Flavell, J. H., Speer, J. R., Green, F. L., & August, D. L. (1981). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(5 Serial No.192). Felner, R. D., Terre, L., Farber, S. S., Primavera, J., & Bishop, T. A. (1985). Child custody: Practices and perspectives of legal professionals. Journal of Clinical Child Psychiatry, 14, 27-34. Fisher, R. P, & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques in investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas. Flin, R., Stevenson, Y., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Children’s knowledge of court proceedings. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 285-297. Gardner, R. A. (1992). Parental alienation syndrome: A guide for mental health and legal professionals. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics. Gardner, R. A. (1999). Guidelines for assessing parental preference in child-custody disputes. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 30, 1-9. Goldstein, M. L. (2014). Child Custody Evaluations. In S. J. Morewitz, & M. L. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Sociology and Psychology. New York: Springer Science + Business Media. Goodman, G. S., & Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 1-19. Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwatz-Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children’s testimony about a stressful event: Improving children’s reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(1), 69-99. Gould, J. W. (1998). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Harari, H., & McDavid, J. W. (1969). Situational influence on moral justice: A study of “finking”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 240-244. Herman, S. P. (1997). Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(10), 57S-68S. Hershkowitz, I. (2009). Socioemotional factors in child sexual abuse investigations. Child Maltreatment, 14(2), 171-181. Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 753-769. Hobbs, S. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2014). Child witnesses in the legal system: Improving child interviews and understanding juror decisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32, 681-685. Jacobson, D. S. (1978). The impact of marital separation/divorce on children. Journal of Divorce, 1(4), 341-360. Johnston, J. R., Roseby, V., & Kuehnle, K. (2009). In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. Springer Publishing Company. Johnson, J. R. (1994). High conflict divorce. Children and Divorce, The Future of Children, 4(1), 165-182. Johnson, J., & Roseby, V. (1997). In the name of the child. New York: The Free Press. Kelly, J. B., & Johnston, J. R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39(3), 249-266. Kelly, J. B. (2000). Children’s adjustment in conflicted marriage and divorce: A decade review of the research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 963-973. Kuehnle, K., Greenberg, L. R., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2004). Incorporating the principles of scientifically based child interviews into family law cases. Journal of Child Custody, 1(1), 97-114. Kuehnle, K. (1996). Assessing allegations of child sexual abuse. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press. Kunin, C. C., Ebbesen, E. B., & Konecni, V. J. (1992). An archival study of dicision-making in child custody disputes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(4), 564-573. Kurdek, L. A., & Siesky, A. E. (1980). Children’s perceptions of their parents’ divorce. Journal of Divorce, 3(4), 339-378. Lamb, M. E., La Rooy, D. J., & Malloy, L C. (2011). Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (2nd Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. West Sussex, England: Wiley. Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201-1231. Lamb, M. E., & Brown, D. A. (2006). Conversational apprentices: Helping children become competent informants about their own experiences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 215-234. Lamb, M. E., & Fauchier, A. (2001). The effects of question type on self-contradictions by children in the course of forensic interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-491. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1998). Conducting investigative interviews of allege sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 813-823. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Thompson, R. A. (1997). The effects of divorce and custody arrangements on children’s behavior, development, and adjustment. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 35(4), 393-404. Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Boat, B., & Everson, M. D. (1996). Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(12), 1251-1259. Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P W., Hovav, M., Manor, T., & Yudilevitch, L. (1996). Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children’s responses. International Journal of Behavioral Developmental, 19(3), 627-637. Lamb, M. E, Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1994). Factors influencing the reliability and validity of statements made by young victims of sexual maltreatment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 255-280. Larson, K., & McGill, J. (2010). Adolescent input into custody decisions: Evaluating decision-making capacities. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 10(2), 133-144. Liu, H. E. (2004). Custody decisions in social and cultural contexts: In-depth and focus group interviews with nineteen judges in Taiwan. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 17(2), 227-305. Lowery, C. R. (1981). Child custody decisions in divorce proceedings: A survey of judges. Professional Psychology, 12, 492-498. Lyon, T. D. (2012). Twenty-five years of interviewing research and practice: Dolls, diagrams, and the dynamics of abuse disclosure. APSAC (American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children) Advisor, 24(1-2), 14-19. Lyon, T. D., & Dorado, J. S. (2008). Truth induction in young maltreated children: The effects of oath-taking and reassurance on true and false disclosures. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 738-748. Lyon, T. D. (2005). Ten step investigative interview. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/thomaslyon/5 Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643-655. McCauley, M. R., & Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 510-516. Memon, A. & Vartoukian, R. (1996). The effects of repeated questioning on young children’s eyewitness testimony. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 403-415. Moston, S. (1987). The suggestibility of children in interview studies. First Language, 7, 67-78. Mulder, M. R., & Vrij, A. (1996). Explaining conversation rules to children: An intervention study to facilitate children’s accurate responses. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(7), 623-631. Nathanson, R., & Saywitz, K. J. (2003). Effects of the courtroom context on children’s memory and anxiety. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31, 67-98. Peterson-Badali, M., & Abramovitch, R. (1992). Children's knowledge of the legal system: Are they competent to instruct legal counsel. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34, 139-160. Pierre-Puysegur, M. (1985, July). The representations of the penal system among children from six to ten years. Presented at the 8th biennial meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Tours, France. Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 975-986. Quas, J. A., Wallin, A. R., Horwitz, B., Davis, E., & Lyon, T. (2009). Maltreated children’s understanding of and emotional reactions to dependency court involvement. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 97-117. Quas, J. A., Goodman, G. S., Bidrose, S., Pipe, M., Craw, S., & Ablin, D. S. (1999). Emotion and memory: Children’s long-term remembering, forgetting, and suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 235-270. Raskin, D. C., & Yuille, J. C. (1989). Problems in evaluation interviews of children in sexual abuse cases. In Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P (Eds), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp.184-207). New York: Springer-Verlag. Reidy, T. J, Silver, R. M., & Carlson, A. (1989). Child custody decisions: A survey of judges. Family Law Quarterly, 13, 75-87. Roberts, K. P., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J. (2004). The effects of rapport-building style on children’s reports of a staged event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 189-202. Roseby, V., & Johnson, J. (1998). Children of Armageddon: Common developmental threats in high-conflict divorcing families. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 7, 295-310. Rudy, L., & Goodman, G. S. (1991). Effects of participation on children’s reports: Implications for children’s testimony. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 527-538. Sattler, J. M. (1998). Clinical and forensic interviewing of children and families: Guidelines for the mental health, education, pediatric, and child maltreatment fields. San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc. Saywitz, K., Camparo, L. B., & Romanoff, A. (2010). Interviewing children in custody cases: Implications of research and policy for practice. Behavior Sciences and the Law, 28, 542-562. Saywitz, K. J., Snyder, L., & Nathanson, R. (1999). Facilitating the communicative competence of the child witness. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 58-68. Saywitz, K. J., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Interviewing children in an out of court: Current research and practice implications. In J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. A. Bulkey, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (pp.297-318). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1996). Narrative elaboration: Test of a new procedure for interviewing children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1347-1357. Saywitz, K. J. (1995). Improving children’s testimony: The question, the answer, and the environment. In M. Zaragoza, J. Graham, G. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. Ben-Porath (Eds). Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp.113-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Saywitz, K. J., & Nathanson, R. (1993). Children’s testimony and their perceptions of stress in and out of the courtroom. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17, 613-622. Saywitz, K. J., Geiselman, R., & Bornstein, G. (1992). Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children’s recall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 744-756. Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E., & Moan, S. F. (1991). Children’s memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), 682-691. Saywitz, K., Jaenicke, C., & Camparo, L. B. (1990). Children’s knowledge of legal terminology. Law and Human Behavior, 14(6), 523-535. Schwaneflugel, P., Guth, M., & Bjorklund, D. (1986). A developmental trend in the understanding of concept attribute importance. Child Development, 57(2), 421-430. Siegman, A., & Reynolds, M. (1983). Effects of mutual invisibility and topical intimacy on verbal fluency in dyadic communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 4443-4455. Smith, A. B., Taylor, N. J., & Tapp, P. (2003). Rethinking children’s involvement in decision making after parental separation. Childhood, 10(2), 201-216. Sorensen, E., Goldman, J., Ward, M., Albanese, I., Graves, L., & Chamberlain, C. (1995). Judicial decision-making in contested custody cases: The influence of reported child abuse, spouse abuse, and parental substance abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 251-260. Sporer, S. L., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2009). Disparities in sentencing decisions. Social psychology of punishment of crime. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Yudilevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Hovav, M. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children’s abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(11), 1133-1146. Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2002). Children’s conceptual knowledge of lying and its relation to their actual behaviors: Implications for court competence examinations. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 395-415. Teoh, Y. S., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Interviewer demeanor in forensic interviews of children. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(2), 145-159. Teoh, Y. S., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Preparing children for investigative interviews: Rapport-building, instruction, and evaluation. Applied Developmental Science, 14(3), 154-163. The British Psychological Society. (2014). Code of research ethics. Tobey, A. E., & Goodman, G. S. (1992). Children’s eyewitness memory: Effects of participation and forensic context. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 779-796. Wallace, S. R., & Koerner, S. S. (2003). Influence of child and family factors on judicial decisions in contested custody cases. Family Relations, 52, 180-188. Walker, A. G. (1993). Questioning young children in court: A linguistic case study. Law & Human Behavior, 17(1), 59-81. Warshak, R. (2003). Payoffs and pitfalls of listening to children. Family Relations, 52, 373-384. Wood, J. M., McClure, K. A., & Birch, R. A. (1996). Suggestions for improving interviews in child protection agencies. Child Maltreatment,1，223-230. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4090 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究呈現臺灣兒童對離婚後監護權爭議案件相關法律語彙之理解與對分離情境之認知能力有隨年級變化的趨勢。114位國小兒童受試者(3低年級、40個中年級、38個高年級)在結構式訪談中定義18個在離婚後監護權爭議案件中常見的法律語彙，以及在聽完一個分離情境故事後，複述該故事並提供與離婚後監護權爭議案件判斷相關的理由。研究結果顯示，兒童在：「法律語彙定義的正確性」、「法律語彙定義的錯誤型態」、不同類型的「離婚後監護權爭議案件判斷的相關理由」的平均數量、不同指涉對象的「離婚後監護權爭議案件判斷的相關理由」的平均數量與「複述故事成功前需要輔助的次數」皆呈現隨年級變化的趨勢。而先前法律相關經驗(是否看過與法律相關的電視節目或電影)與字彙能力和兒童的上開能力表現有關。研究結果對於未來研究、法庭準備、訓練法律相關專業人員如何使用符合兒童能力的溝通方式有所助益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The present study examined age-related trends in Taiwanese children’s knowledge of legal terminology and perceptions of separation scenarios commonly used in child custody disputes. Participants were 114 elementary school students comprising 3 groups of 36 in low grades, 40 in middle grades, and 38 in high grades. Grade-related trends emerged in children’s knowledge of 18 legal terms, their errors response types of terms, and amount of information in responding to a story with separation scenarios. Factors, such as verbal skills and legal-related television programs/movies watching experiences, are correlated with children’s communicative abilities pertaining to providing testimony. Implications of future research and applications on court preparation and training of legal professionals are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T09:20:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03227109-1.pdf: 1786597 bytes, checksum: 352cb3ea88bab396443459a835787d8c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iv 英文摘要 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 兒童證人與兒童證詞 1 第二節 離婚後監護權爭議案件中的兒童 2 第三節 離婚後監護權爭議案件中的兒童訪談 3 第四節 兒童對離婚後監護權爭議案件相關法律語彙與分離情境的理解與認知 11 第五節 研究問題與研究假設 12 第二章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究對象 14 第二節 研究材料 16 第三節 研究流程 17 第四節 編碼 23 第三章 研究結果 35 第一節 隨年級變化的趨勢 35 第二節 可能影響兒童與離婚後監護權爭議案件相關能力的其他變項 59 第四章 研究討論 62 第一節 法律語彙定義的正確性和錯誤型態 62 第二節 複述分離情境故事是否複述成功和複述分離情境故事成功前需要輔助的次數 64 第三節 與離婚後監護權爭議案件判斷的相關理由 66 第四節 研究限制、未來展望與結論 72 參考文獻 75 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 兒童司法訪談 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 監護權爭議 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兒童證人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 司法詢(訊)問 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | forensic interviewing | en |
| dc.subject | child witness | en |
| dc.subject | child custody disputes | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣兒童對離婚後監護權爭議案件相關法律語彙之理解與對分離情境之認知 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Taiwanese children’s knowledge of legal terminology and perceptions of separation scenarios in child custody disputes | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 馮涵棣(Heidi Fung),戴瑀如(Yu-Zu Tai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 監護權爭議,兒童證人,司法詢(訊)問,兒童司法訪談, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | child custody disputes,child witness,forensic interviewing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603244 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf | 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。