請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40905
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Rong He | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何怡蓉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T17:06:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-09-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文部分
Andreae, M.O., 1978, “Distribution and speciation of arsenic in natural-waters and some marine-algal,” Deep Sea Research 25:391-402. ANZ (Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand),1995, “Risk Management,”AS/NZS 430:1995, Standards Australia:Homebush, New South Wales, Australia.Standards for New zealand:Wellington, NZ. ASTM,1998, “Standard Guidance for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Chemical Release (RBCA),” ASTM PS 104-98. Baroni, F., Boscagli, A., Di L, L.A., et al, 2004, “ Arsenic in soil and vegetation of contaminated areas in southern Tuscany ( Italy),” Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 81: 1-14. Belfroid, A., Berg, M. van den, Seinen, W., Hermens, J., Gestel K. van., 1995, “ Uptake, bioavailability, and elimination of hydrophobic compounds in earthworms (Eisenis andrei) in field-contaminated soil,” Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14(4):605-612. Bennett, J.R., Kaufman, C.A., Koch Iris, Sova Jim, Reimer, K.J., 2007, “Ecological risk assessment of lead contamination at rifle and pistol ranges using techniques to account for site characteristics,” Science of the Total Environment 374 : 91-101. Chino, M.,1981, Chapter6.Metal stress in rice plants, in Kutagishi,K.,and Yamane, I.(eds.), “Heavy Metal Pollution in Soil of Japan,” Tokyo:Japan Scientific Societies Press,pp.65-80. Chen, C.J., Wu, M.M., Kuo, T.L. ,1988, “Arsenic and cancers,” Lancet, 1: 414-415. CLARINET,2002, “Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies. Sustainable Management of contaminated land: an overview,” A report from the Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies. Cullen, A. C., Frey, H. C., 1999, “Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment,” Plenum Press, New York and London. Edwards, C.A., 2004, “ Earthworm ecology,” 2nd edn. CRC Press Boca Raton FL. EEA(European Environment Agency), “Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe,” Copenhagen, Denmark; 2002. Environmental Software Consultants, Inc.,2006, “SEVIEW User,s Guide.” Harestad, A.S., Bunnell, F.L., 1979, “ Home range and body weight - a reevaluation,” Ecology. 60:389-402. Hope, B.K., 1995 , “A review of models for estimating terrestrial ecological receptor exposure to chemical contaminants,” Chemosphere, 30(12):2267-2287. IARC ,1980, “Arsenic and arsenic compounds”. IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Some metal and metallic compounds. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 23: 39-141. IARC ,1987, Arsenic and arsenic compounds (Group 1). In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risks to humans. Supplement 7, date accessed: 6 February 1998. Available IPCS ,2001, “Arsenic and arsenic compounds”. EHC, No: 224. Keith, R.S., Paul Sibley, 2002, “New concepts in ecological risk assessment : where do we go from here,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44:279-285. Lee, K.E, 1985, “ Earthworm. In There ecology and relationships with soil and land use,” Academic Press , Australia. Lu Haiyi, Axe Lisa, Tyson Trevor A., 2003, “Development and application of computer simulation tools for ecological risk assessment,” Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8:311-322. Malachowski, M.E. ,1990, “An update on arsenic”. Clin. Lab. Med., 10: 459-471. Ma, H.W., Crawford-Brown, D.J., The comparison of the systems approach and the single-medium approach in environmental risk-based decision making: a case study of a sludge management problem. Journal of Environmental Systems 26 (1998) 215-247. Ma, H.W., Tsai, J.N.,2001, “ Stochastic Risk Assessment for Dioxin Impact from a Municipal Waste Incinerator,” The 14th Environmental Planning and Management Conference, Taiwan . Ma, H.W., 2002, “Stochastic multimedia risk assessment for a site with contaminated groundwater. Stochastic Environmental Resesrch and Risk Assessment 16:464-478. Merkle A, Kaupenjohann M , 2000, “ Development of ecosystem effect indicators,” Third SETAC World Congress, 21–25, Brighton, UK. SETAC Europe Av. de la Toison d’Or 67 B-1060 Brussels Belgium. Meharg, A.A., Rahman, M.M., 2003, “Arsenic contaminant of Bangladesh Paddy field soils : implications for rice contribution to Arsenic Consumption,”Environ. Sci. Technol. , vol. 37, pp. 229-234. MHPPE(Minsitry of Housing,Physical Planning and Environment), 1989 ,“Premises for Risk Management:Risk Limits in the Context of Environment Policy,” Directorate General for Environment Protection, The Hague,The Netherlands. Morgan, J.E., Morgan, A..J., 1988, “ Earthworms as biological monitors of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc in metalliferous soils,” Environ. Pollut, 54:123-138. Nabholz, 3.V., 1991, “Environmental hazard and risk assessment under the United States Toxic Substances Control Act,” Science of the Total Environment 109/110:649-665. NRC (National Research Council),1983, “Risk assessment in the Federal Government : Managing the Process. NAS-NRC Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health,” National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Pascoe, G.A., Blancher R.J, Linder, G., 1996, “Food chain analysis of exposures and risks to wildlife at a metals-contaminated wetland,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 30, 306–318. Pontius, F.W., Brown, K.G., Chen, C.J., 1994, “Health implication of arsenic in drinking water,”J. Am. Water Works Ass., 86: 52-63. Power M., MaCarty, L.S., 2002, “Trend in development of ecological risk assessment and management frameworks” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,9:7-18. RC(Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management),1997, “Framework for environment health risk management,” Final Report Vol 1 and Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory. Ross, P., Birnbaum, L., 2003, “Integrated human and ecological risk assessment: a case study of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) risks to humans and wildlife,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9:303–24. Rubinstein, R.Y.,1981, “ Simulation and the Monte Carlo method,” New York ,1981 Sample, B.E., Opresko D.M., Suter II G.W., 1996, “Toxicological benchmarksfor wildlife: 1996 revision,” ES/ER/TM-86/R3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. Sample B. E., Aplin M. S., Efroymson R. A., Suter II G. W., Welsh C. J. E., 1997, “ Methods and tools for estimation of the exposure of terrestrial wildlife to contaminants.,” Environmental Sciences Division Publication No.4650. Sample, B.E., Suter, G.W., Beauchamp, J.J., Efroymson, R.A.,1999, “ Literature-derived bioaccumulation models for earthworms: development and validation,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18:2110–2120. Schoener, T.W., 1968, “ Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology,” 49:123-141. Stinner, B.R., House, G.J., 1990, “ Anthropod and other invertebrates in tests,” Pestic. Sci. 10:66-74. Sullivan, R.J., 1969, “Preliminary air pollution survey of arsenic and its compound,” Aliterature review.US Department of Health, Education and WelFare,National Air Pollution Control Administration,Raleigh,NC. Suter II , G.W.,1993, “ Ecological Risk Assessment,” Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA. Suter II, G.W., Efroymson, R.A., Sample, B.E., Jones, D.S., 2000, “ Ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites,” Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 438. Suter II, G.W., Theo Vermeire,Wayne R.Munns,Jr., Jun Sekizawa,2003, “Framework for the integration of health and ecological risk assessment,”Human and Ecological Risk Assessment , 9:281-301. Tchounwou,P.B., Patlolla, A.K., 2004,”Arsenic toxicity,mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis - a health risk assessment and management approach,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 225:47-55. UKDOE(U.K. Department of the Environment),1995, “A guide to risk assessment and risk management for environment protection”, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,London,UK. Urban, D.J., Cook, N.J., 1986, “ Standard Evaluation Procedure for Ecological Risk Assessment,” EPA/540/09-86/167, Hazard Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. USEPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,1989, “Risk Assessment Guidance for Surperfund: Human Health Evaluation Manual,” vol.1(PartA) USEPA, 1991, “Ecological assessment of hazardous waste sites: a field and laboratory reference,” Washington: Office of Research and Development, EPA/540/R-92/003. USEPA., 1992, “Framework for ecological risk assessment,” EPA/630/R-92/001, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. USEPA, 1993b, “Risk assessment and modeling overview document,” EPA/905/R-93/0077, Great Lakes National Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. USEPA, 1993a, “Wildlife exposure factors handbooks. United States Environmental Protection Agency,” Office of Research and Development., Washington, D. C. USEPA, 1998, “ Guideline for ecological risk assessment,” EPA/630/R-95/002F. USEPA, 2005,“Air Dispersion and Deposition Modeling, Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities,” Office of Solid Waste. Van Hook, R.I., 1974, “Cadmium, lead and zinc distributions between earthworms and soils: Potentials for biological accumulation,” Bull. Environ. Contam, Toxicol., 12:509-612. Vermeire, T., MacPhail, R., Waters, M., 2003, “Integrated human and ecological risk assessment: a case study of organophosphorous pesticides in the environment,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9:343–357. Watters, R.L., Edgington, D.N., Hakonson,T.E., Hanson,W.C., Smith, M.H., Whicker, F.W., Wildung, R.E., 1980. “ Synthesis of the Research Literature,” In Transuranic Elements in the Environment. U.S. Department of Energy. World Health Organization(WHO),1981, “Environment Health Criteria 18:Arsenic,” Geneva:World Health Organization. World Health Organization (WHO),2001, “ Report on Integrated Risk Assessment,” WHO/IPCS/IRA/10/12. Geneva, Switzerland Yoshinaga, J., Chatterjee, A., Shibata, Morita, Y.M., Edmonds, J.S., 2000, “Human urine certified reference material for arsenic speciation”. Clin. Chem., 46: 1781-1786. Yeh, G.T., 1981, “ AT123D: Analytical Transient One-, Two-, and Three-Dimensional Simulation of Waste Transport in the Aquifer System,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Publication No. 1439. 中文部分 行政院環境保護署,2006,「土壤及地下水污染場址健康風險評估評析方法及撰寫指引」。 行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,2004,「勞工作業場所化學危害暴露之風險評估」。 張尊國,2006,「台北市農地土壤重金屬砷含量調查及查證計畫」,臺北市政府環境保護局。 張尊國,2008,「北投關渡平原砷含量異常農地對作物影響之研究計畫」,臺北市政府產業發展局。 謝添進,2002,「台北、高屏地區土壤污染涵容能力推估」,國立成功大學環境工程學系碩士論文。 邱弘毅,葉錦瑩,薛玉梅,陳建仁,1994,「台灣地區砷、汞、鎘及其化合物之用途和用量調查研究」,中華民國公共衛生雜誌,13:113-125。 邱弘毅,薛玉梅,許益祥,黃偉益,陳相志,朱子賢,魏敏澧,許鈴宜,謝芳宜,陳吳銓,陳建仁,1996,「無機砷與內臟癌相關之流行病學研究」中華民國公共衛生雜誌,15:92-108。 蔡文華,2004,「生態風險評估初探暨案例分析」,國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 邵廣昭,2000,「關渡自然保留區及關渡自然公園環境監測與研究(第二期)」, 中央研究院動物研究所,台北市政府建設局委託。 郭泠,2003,「麻雀食性分析及控制利用的研究」,河北省科學院學報,20:255-262。 郭登志,1987,「台灣紅蚯蚓(Pheretima asiatica)之繁殖,成分分析及其對土壤之肥效」,生物科學30:7-15。 參考網址 美國環保署生態毒理資料庫 http://www.epa.gov/ecotox 環保署毒理資料庫http://flora2.epa.gov.tw/prog/database.asp | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40905 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台北市調查土壤重金屬與地下水,發現關渡平原土壤重金屬砷濃度異常過高。關渡平原所受污染的土壤為農地,因此污染物會藉由當地作物直接吸收進入食物鏈進而影響人體健康。除了人體健康受到危害外,當地的生態系統為最直接受到暴露的受體。因此本研究利用「臺北市農地土壤重金屬砷含量調查及查證計畫」結果為評估基礎,針對關渡平原砷污染農地進行健康與生態風險評估。
健康風險評估部分,本研究評估污染場址透過土壤、空氣、地下水及食物鏈介質,估算經由直接或間接暴露途徑對受體(農民、自家栽種、鄰近居民及遊客)健康造成潛在風險危害的可能性。健康風險評估結果為鄰近居民與遊客於場址一的致癌風險與非致癌風險皆在可接受範圍之內(<10-6);而在農民及自家栽種場址一的評估結果,由於其食物鏈攝取比例較高,因此農民及自家栽種致癌風險與非致癌風險皆超過可接受範圍(>10-6)。在生態風險評估部分,本研究評估當地物種,包括稻米、蚯蚓及麻雀,其透過污染物直接吸收以及食物鏈暴露途徑所造成潛在風險危害。生態風險評估結果為稻米在三個場址中其風險皆小於毒害濃度。蚯蚓及麻雀在場址一的風險商數接近於1(RQ=0.99、0.96),其在場址二及場址三風險商數值皆未超過1。 透過本研究健康與生態風險評估結果,可做為未來管理單位對當地擬定改善、整治策略,不管是在人體健康亦或是生態系統角度上,提供其適切之管理及決策依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The heavy metals in the soils and the groundwater were investigated in Taipei in 2007, and found that the concentration of Arsenic is extraordinarily high in Guandu. The agricultural land is main polluted source, so the pollutant could enter the food-chain through the absorbance by the plants. Besides, the local ecosystem is the most direct receptor that exposed to the pollutant. Therefore, the study is based on the results of “Monitoring and investigation of heavy metals in soil of Taipei City”, and carries out health and ecological risk assessment in Guandu.
The medium includes soil, air, groundwater and food chain on health risk assessment in this study, and the potential harmful effects of receptors were assessed by direct and indirect exposure routes. The result of health risk assessment shows that the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of residents and tourists on site 1 are less than the standard (<10-6). The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of farmers and self-contained farmers exceed the standard (>10-6). The indicators contain rice, earthworms and sparrows on ecological risk assessment in this study, and the potential harmful effects of receptors were assessed by direct and indirect exposure routes. The results show that the risk of rice in three sites is lower than toxic level. The RQs of earthworms and sparrows in site 1 are close to 1, and that in site 2 and 3 are less than 1. Health and ecological risk assessment were integrated in this study. Through the assessment, important factors are confirmed and resulting risks quantified and thus the management and policy determination for remediation of the contaminated site can be suggested. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:06:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95541206-1.pdf: 1487394 bytes, checksum: 91055f235bcc1ec33f42cdf0a48b00ad (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝誌 摘要 Abstract 目錄 I 圖目錄 III 表目錄 IV 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 台灣地區農地土壤污染情況 5 2.2 關渡平原環境資料 6 2.3 重金屬砷的來源及危害 7 2.4 風險評估 9 2.4.1 健康風險評估 10 2.4.2 生態風險評估 13 2.4.3 整合性風險評估 20 2.5 小結 23 第三章 研究方法 24 3.1 關渡平原風險評估架構 24 3.1.1 關渡平原土壤資料 25 3.1.2 關渡平原農地情境評估 28 3.2 健康風險評估流程 29 3.2.1 健康風險評估架構 29 3.2.2 研究步驟 32 3.2.3健康風險評估情境設定 34 3.2.4 健康風險評估模式介紹 36 3.2.5 健康風險評估參數說明 44 3.3 生態風險評估研究流程 46 3.3.1 生態風險評估架構 46 3.3.2 研究步驟 49 3.3.3生態風險評估情境設定 51 3.3.4 生態風險評估模式介紹 57 3.3.5 生態風險評估模式參數蒐集 58 3.4 不確定性分析 60 第四章 結果與討論 61 4.1 健康風險評估 61 4.1.1 環境介質濃度 61 4.1.2 模擬值評估結果 62 4.1.3 監測數值與法規值評估結果 69 4.1.4 健康風險評估不確定性分析 72 4.2 生態風險評估 76 4.2.1 生態風險評估結果 76 4.2.2 生態風險評估不確定性分析 78 第五章 結論與建議 81 5.1 結論 81 5.2 建議 83 參考文獻 85 附錄 90 圖目錄 圖1-1 本研究架構圖 4 圖2-1 風險評估與風險管理流程 10 圖2-2 荷蘭風險評估與管理架構 17 圖2-3 英國風險評估與管理架構 18 圖2-4 整合性風險評估架構圖 21 圖3-1 風險評估流程 25 圖3-2 關渡平原農地 26 圖3-3 多介質傳輸模式 28 圖3-4 風險評估架構圖 29 圖3-5 本研究健康風險評估流程圖 33 圖3-6 SESOIL土壤層間的傳輸機制 38 圖3-7 地面上蔬菜濃度變化示意圖 41 圖3-8 地下水傳輸途徑示意圖 42 圖3-9 空氣傳輸途徑示意圖 43 圖3-10生態風險評估架構 47 圖3-11本研究生態風險評估流程圖 50 圖3-12本研究生態風險評估概念模式圖 54 圖4-1 直接暴露致癌風險敏感度分析 75 圖4-2 間接暴露致癌風險敏感度分析 75 圖4-3 麻雀風險商數敏感度分析(場址一) 80 表目錄 表2-1 重金屬砷對人體健康危害 9 表2-2 國內相關生態風險評估論文 19 表3-1 關渡平原農地採樣分析值 27 表3-2 關渡平原農地土壤一期作水稻植體採樣分析值 27 表3-3 關渡平原農地土壤二期作水稻植體採樣分析值 27 表3-4 關渡平原健康風險暴露情境 36 表3-5 SESOIL參數輸入表 39 表3-6 風險危害程度表 49 表3-7 關渡自然公園水稻田各種鳥類分佈情形 53 表3-8 關渡平原生態風險暴露情境 56 表4-1 土壤地下水情境設定 61 表4-2 土壤地下水模式輸出結果 62 表4-3 健康風險評估環境介質濃度 62 表4-4 致癌風險評估結果 65 表4-5 非致癌風險評估結果 67 表4-6 模擬值及監測數值風險結果比較 70 表4-7 模擬值及法規值風險結果比較 71 表4-8 健康風險不確定性結果 73 表4-9 生態風險評估環境介質濃度 76 表4-10生態風險評估結果 78 表4-11生態風險不確定性結果 79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 關渡平原砷污染農地健康與生態風險評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Health and Ecological Risk Assessment for Arsenic Contaminated Site in Guandu | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳先琪,張尊國 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 健康風險評估,生態風險評估,關渡平原,土壤地下水,風險商數, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Health risk assessment,Ecological risk assessment,Guandu,soil and groundwater,risk quotient (RQ), | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。