請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40879
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思賢 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-PO Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許文柏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T17:04:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-10-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、史特勞斯(Leo Strauss)的著作: 1935a The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1935b Philosophy and Law: Contributions to the Understanding of Maimonides and his Predecessors. Edited by Eve Adler. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1939 ‘’The Spirit of Sparta or the Taste of Xenophon’’ Social Research. Vol. 6 No.4 November 1939. 1947 ‘’On the Intention of Rousseau’’ Social Research. Vol. 14 No.4 December 1947. 1952 Persecution and Art of Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1953 Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1958 Thoughts on Machiavelli. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1959 What is Political Philosophy? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1961 ‘’Correspondence Concerning Wahrheit und Methode: Leo Strauss and Hans-Georg Gadamer’’, The Independent Journal of Philosophy. Pp. 5-12. 1962 Spinoza’s Critique of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1964 The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1966 Socrates and Aristophanes. New York: Basic Books, Inc. 1968 Liberalism Ancient and Modern. New York: Basic Books, Inc. 1970 Xenophon’s Socratic Discourse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1972a Xenophon’s Socrates. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1972b ‘’Political Philosophy and the Crisis of Our Time’’ in George J. Graham, Jr. and George W. Carey(ed) The Post-behavioral Era: perspectives on political science. New York: David McKay Company, Inc. 1975a The Argument and Action of Plato’s Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1975b Political Philosophy: Six Essays. Edited with an introduction by Hilail Gildin. Indianapolis & New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. 1983 ‘’Correspondence Concerning Modernity: Karl Lowith and Leo Strauss.’’ January 10, 1946 Independent Journal of Philosophy. Vol. Ⅳ Pp. 105-119. 1983 Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1987 History of Political Philosophy. edited with Joseph Cropsey. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company. 1988 ‘’Correspondence: Carl Lowith and Leo Strauss.’’ Independent Journal of Philosophy. Vol.5/6 Pp.177-192. 1989a An Introduction to Political Philosophy: Ten Essays. Edited with an introduction by Hilail Gildin. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. 1989b The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1991 On Tyranny: An Interpretation of Xenophon’s Hiero. New York :Free Press. 1993 Faith and Political Philosophy: The Correspondence Between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin, 1934-1964. (translated and edited by Peter Emberley and Barry Cooper) 1997 Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity: Essays and Lectures in Modern Jewish Thought. Edited by Kenneth Hart Green. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1998 《政治哲學史》,李天然等譯,石家莊:河北人民出版社。 2001 On Plato’s Symposium. Edited and with a foreword by Seth Benardete. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2001a 《霍布斯的政治哲學》,申 彤譯,南京:譯林出版社。 2002b The Early Writings(1921-1932). Translated and edited by Michael Zank. Albany: State University of New York Press. 2003 《關於馬基雅維里的思考》,申 彤譯,南京:譯林出版社。 2005 《自然權利與歷史》,彭 剛譯,北縣:左岸文化。 2006a 《論僭政》,何 地譯,北京:華夏出版社。 2006b 《回歸古典政治哲學—施特勞斯通信集》,北京:華夏出版社。 二、其他 王 恒 2008 《柏拉圖的“克里特遠征”》,上海:上海人民出版社。 甘 陽 2003 《政治哲人施特勞斯:古典保守主義政治哲學的復興》,香港:牛津大學出版社。 何畫瑰 2003 《走出演說術的迷陣:柏拉圖早至中期作品中哲學與詩的爭執》,國立台灣大學哲學研究所博士論文,未出版。 吳增定 2004 《尼采與柏拉圖主義》,上海:上海人民出版社。 胡全威 2001 《史特勞斯》,台北:生智文化。 陳思賢 1999 〈理(Logos)與法(Nomos)的對立:柏拉圖與奧古斯丁政體建構理論的一個透視方式〉,《西洋政治思想史》古典世界篇,頁63-101。 陳建洪 2005 《耶路撒冷抑或雅典:施特勞斯四論》,北京:華夏出版社。 程志敏 2005 《宮牆之門:柏拉圖政治哲學發凡》,北京:華夏出版社。 賀照田主編 2002 《西方現代性的曲折與展開》,長春:吉林人民出版社。 劉小楓 2002a 《刺蝟的溫順》,上海:上海文藝出版社。 2002b 《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,劉小楓主編,張新樟等譯 上海:三聯書店。 2002c 《馴服欲望—施特勞斯筆下的色諾芬撰述》,劉小楓主編,賀志剛等譯,北京:華夏出版社。 魏中平 2008 〈歷史與真理:論史特勞斯與高達美的經典文本詮釋爭議〉,載於《通識教育與跨域研究》,第27-54頁。 Tarcov, Nathan and Thomas Pangle 趙學維(譯) 1991 〈里奧•史特勞斯與政治哲學史〉,周陽山主編,《當代政治心靈》,台北:正中書局。頁206-264。 Smith, Steven B. 胡全威、張東揚(譯) 2004 〈評里奧•史特勞斯影響美國外交政策之說〉,《政治科學論叢》第二十一期,2004,頁1-18。 Al Farabi 2005 《柏拉圖的哲學》,程志敏(譯),上海:華東師範大學出版社。 Almond, Gabriel A. 1990 A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. London: Sage Publications. Andrew, Edward. 1983 'Descent to the Cave.' Review of Politics 45 (1983): 510-35. 2002 〈下降到洞穴〉,張新樟(譯),收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第581-614頁。 Aristophanes 1989 《利西翠妲》,呂健忠(譯)。台北:書林出版有限公司。 2004 《亞里斯多芬喜劇六種》,羅念生(譯),上海:上海人民出版社。 Behnegar, Nasser. 1995 ‘The Liberal Politics of Leo Strauss’ in Palmer, Michael and Thomas L. Pangle(eds) Political Philosophy and the Human Soul: Essays in memory of Allan Bloom. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. pp. 251-268. 1997 ‘’Leo Strauss’s Confrontation with Max Weber: A Search for a Genuine Social Science.’’ The Review of Politics. Vol.59 No.1 Winter 1997 pp. 97-125. 2003 Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Batnitzky, Leora 2006 Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Beiner, Ronald 1997 Philosophy in a Time of Lost Spirit. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Benardete, Seth 1989 Socrates’ Second Sailing: On Plato’s Republic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2000 The Argument of the Action. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2002 〈施特勞斯的《城邦與人》〉張新樟(譯),收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第557-580頁。 2005 〈史特勞斯論柏拉圖〉,鄭興風(譯),載於程志敏著,《宮牆之門:柏拉圖政治哲學發凡》,第277-289頁。 Bloom, Allan. 1987 The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster. 1990 Giants and Dwarfs: Essay 1960-1990. New York: Simon and Schuster. 2003 《巨人與侏儒》,秦露等(譯),北京:華夏出版社。 2006 〈文本的研習〉,韓 潮(譯),收入《什麼是思想史》,上海:上海人民出版社,第43-63頁。 2007 《美國精神的封閉》,戰旭英(譯),南京:譯林出版社。 Bruell, Christopher 1983 ‘’Strauss on Xenophen’s Socrates’’ Political Science Reviewer 13(1983): 95-153; 14(1984): 263-318. 1994 ‘’On Plato’s Political Philosophy’’ The Review of Politics. 56: 261-82. 2002 〈施特勞斯論色諾芬筆下的蘇格拉底〉,程志敏(譯),收入劉小楓主編,《馴服欲望》,北京:華夏出版社,第187-242頁。 Burger, Ronna 2007 《走向古典詩學之路》,肖澗(譯),北京:華夏出版社。 Cooper, Barry and Peter Emberley, eds & trans. 1993 Faith and Political Philosophy: The Correspondence between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin. University Park, Penna.: Pennsylvania State University Press. Cropsey, Joseph. 1964 Ancients and Moderns: Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in honor of Leo Strauss. New York: Basic Books, Inc. 1983 ‘’ Liberalism, Nature and Convention’’ Independent Journal of Philosophy . Vol. Ⅳ 1983. pp. 47-53. Dallmayr, Fred 1984 Polis and Praxis. MIT Press 1987 ‘’Politics Against Philosophy: Strauss and Drury’’ Political Theory, Vol.15 No. 3, August 1987 pp. 326-337. 1994 ‘’Leo Strauss Peregrinus’’ Social Research 61(Winter 1994):877-906 Deutsch, Kenneth L. and Walter Soffer. (eds) 1987 The Crisis of Liberal Democracy: A Straussian Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press. Deutsch, Kenneth L. and Walter Nicgorski. (eds) 1994 Leo Strauss: Political Philosopher and Jewish Thinker. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Deutsch, Kenneth L. and John A. Murley. (eds) 1999 Leo Strauss, the Straussians, and the American Regime. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Devigne, Robert 1994 Recasting Conservatism: Oakeshott, Strauss, and the Response to Postmodernism. New Haven: Yale University Press. Drury, Shadia B 1987 ‘’Leo Strauss’s Classic Natural Right Teaching’’ Political Theory, Vol.15 No. 3, August 1987 pp. 299-315. 1988 The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss. London: The Macmillan Press. 1994 Alexandre Kojeve: The Roots of Postmodern Politics. London : The Macmillan Press Ltd. 1997 Leo Strauss and the American Right. New York: St. Martin's. 2006 《列奧•施特勞斯與美國右派》,劉 華等(譯),上海:華東師範大學出版社。 Dutton, Brett A. R. 2002 ‘’Leo Strauss’s Recovery of the Political: The City and Man as Reply to Carl Schmitt’s The Concept of the Political, ‘’ Ph. D Dissertation, University of Sydney. Ferry, Luc 1990 Political Philosophy: Vol.1. Rights—The New Quarrel between the Ancients and the Moderns. Trans by Franklin Philip. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Ferry, Luc & Alain Renaut. 1992 Political Philosophy: Vol.3. From the Rights of Man to the Republican Idea. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Fortin, Ernest L. 1994 (with Glenn Hughes )‘’The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence: Two Reflections and Two Comments. The Review of Politics. Vol.56. No.2(Spring 1994). Pp. 337-357. 1996 Classical Christianity and the Political Order. trans. J. Brian Benestad. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Frazer, Michael L. 2006 ‘’Esotericism Ancient and Modern: Strauss Contra Straussianism on the Art of Political- Philosophical Writing’’ Political Theory. Vol. 34, No.1, February 2006. pp. 33-61. Fukuyama, Francis 1992 The End of History and the Last Man. Penguin Books. 2004 《歷史之終結與最後一人》,李永熾(譯),台北:時報出版。 Gourevitch, Victor. 1968 ‘’Philosophy and Politics Ⅰ&Ⅱ’’ The Review of Metaphysics. Vol. 22 , No.1(September 1968): 58-64; Vol. 22, No.2(December 1968): 281-328. 2002 〈哲學與政治〉,賀志剛(譯),收入劉小楓主編,《馴服欲望》,北京:華夏出版社,第26-88頁。 Grant, G. P. 1964 ‘Tyranny and Wisdom: A Comment on the Controversy Between Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve.’ Social Research, 31:1(1964:Spring)pp.45-72. Green, Kenneth Hart 1993 Jew and Philosopher: The Return to Maimonides in the Jewish Thought of Leo Strauss. Albany: State University of New York Press. 2002 〈現代猶太思想流變中的施特勞斯〉,游 斌譯,收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第581-614頁。 Gunnell, John. 1979 Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation. Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers, Inc. 1986 Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press. Hegel 1996 《法哲學原理》,范揚、張企泰(譯),北京:商務印書館。 Holmes, Stephen 1993 The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Harvard University Press. 2002 《反自由主義剖析》,曦 中等(譯),北京:中國社會科學出版社。 Jung, Hwa Yol (鄭和烈) 1993 ‘’Leo Strauss’s Conception pf Political Philosophy’’ in Rethinking Political Theory: Essays in Phenomenology and the Study of Politics. Ohio University Press. pp.113-134. Jaffa, Harry V. 1984 ‘’The Legacy of Leo Strauss’’ Claremont Review of Books Vol. 3 No.3 Fall 1984.pp. 14-21. 1984b ‘’The Legacy of Leo Strauss’’ Defended. Claremont Review of Books Vol. 4 No.1 Spring 1985. pp. 20-24. 1987 ‘’Dear Professor Drury’’ Political Theory, Vol.15 No. 3, August 1987 pp. 316-325. Kielmansegg, Peter Grag. Horst Mewes. Elisabeth Glaser-Schmidt, eds. 1994 Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss.: German Emigres and American Political Thought After World War Ⅱ.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lampert, Laurence 1996 Leo Strauss and Nietzsche. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2005a ‘Nietzsche’s Challenge to Philosophy in the Thought of Leo Strauss’ The Review of Metaphysics. 58(March 2005): 585-619. 2005b 《施特勞斯與尼采》,田立年、賀志剛等(譯),上海:上海三聯書店。 Larmore, Charles 1995 The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Levine, Peter 1996 ‘’Nietzsche and the Modern Crisis of the Humanities’’ in Nietzsche Today. Albany: SUNY Press. Lilla, Mark 2005 《當知識份子遇到政治》,鄧曉菁、王笑紅(譯),北京:新星出版社。 Lowenthal, David 2002 〈施特勞斯的《柏拉圖式的政治哲學研究》,張新樟(譯),收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第581-614頁。 Machiavelli, Niccolo 1998 The Prince. Translated and with an Introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2003 《李維羅馬史疏義》,呂健忠(譯),台北縣:左岸文化。 Mansfield, Harvey C. 1998 Machiavelli’s Virtue. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2002 〈施特勞斯之馬基雅維里〉,田立年(譯),收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第461-477頁。 McAllister, Ted V 1996 Revolt Against Modernity: Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin, and The Search for a Postliberal Order. University Press of Kansas. McWillaims Wilson Carey 1998 ‘’Leo Strauss and the Dignity of American Political Thought’’ The Review of Politics. Vol. 60 No.2 Spring 1998 pp. 231-246. Meier, Heinrich 1995 Carl Schmitt & Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue. translated by J. Harvey Lomax.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2002a 《隱匿的對話:施米特與施特勞斯》,朱雁冰、汪慶華等(譯),北京:華夏出版社。 2002b ’’Why Political Philosophy?’’ The Review of Metaphysics. 56(December 2002): 385-407. 2002 《古今之爭的核心問題》,林國基等譯,北京:華夏出版社。 2003 Leo Strauss and the Theologico-Political Problem. New York: Cambridge University Press. Miller, Eugene F 1975 ‘’Leo Strauss: The Recovery of Political Philosophy’’ in Anthony de Crespigny and Kenneth Minogue. Contemporary Political Philosophers. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, Inc. Neumann, Harry. 1976 ‘’What is Philosophy?: An Interpretation of the Theological-political Problem’’ Independent Journal of Philosophy Vol.1 1976. pp. 31-38. 1978 ‘’Civic Piety and Socratic Atheism: An Interpretation of Strauss’s Socrates and Aristophanes. ’’ Independent Journal of Philosophy Vol.2 pp. 33-37. 2002 〈城邦的虔敬與蘇格拉底的無神論—解讀施特勞斯的《蘇格拉底與阿里斯托芬》〉,張新樟譯,收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第615-628頁。 Nichols, James H. Jr. 2004 《伊壁鳩魯主義的政治哲學》,溥林(譯),北京:華夏出版社。 Nichols, Mary P. 1987 Socrates and Political Community. The State University of New York Press. 2007 《蘇格拉底與政治共同體》,王雙洪(譯),北京:華夏出版社。 Norton, Anne 2004 Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Novak, David. (ed) 1996 Leo Strauss and Judaism: Jerusalem and Athens Critically Revisited. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc Orr, Susan. 1995 Jerusalem and Athens: Reason and Revelation in the Work of Leo Strauss. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Palmer, Michael and Thomas L. Pangle(eds) 1995 Political Philosophy and the Human Soul: Essays in memory of Allan Bloom. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Pangle, L. Thomas 1985 The Platonism of Leo Strauss: A Reply to Harry Jaffa’’ Claremont Review of Books Vol. 4 No.1 Spring 1985. pp18-20. Pangle, L. Thomas(ed) 1988 The Roots of Political Philosophy: The Forgotten Socratic Dialogues. Translated , with Interpretative Studies by Thomas L. Pangle. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Pines, Shlomo 1988 ‘’On Leo Strauss’’ Independent Journal of Philosophy Vol.5/6 1988. pp. 169-171. Pippen, Robert 1992 ‘The Modern World of Leo Strauss’ 1993 ‘Being, Time, and Politics: the Strauss- Kojeve Debate.’ History and Theory., 22/2(May 1993)pp.138-161. 2002 〈施特勞斯的現代世界〉,張新樟譯,收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第303-358頁。 2003 ‘’The Unavailability of the Ordinary: Strauss on the Philosophical Fate of Modernity. Political Theory., Vol. 31 No.3 June 2003 pp. 335-358. Plato 1980 The Laws of Plato. Translated with notes and an interpretative essay by Thomas Pangle. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 1991 The Republic of Plato. Translated with notes and an interpretative essay by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books. 1997 《歐伊梯孚容篇(Euthyphron)》,彭文林(譯註),台中縣:廣陽譯學出版社。 1998 《蘇格拉底之死》,呂健忠(譯),台北:書林。 2001 《法律篇》,張智仁、何勤華(譯),上海:上海人民出版社。 2002 《理想國》,郭斌和、張竹明(譯),北京:商務印書館。 2007 《蘇格拉底的申辯》,吳飛(譯疏),北京:華夏出版社。 Pocock, J. G. A. 1975 ‘’Prophet and Inquisitor, or, A Church Built Upon Bayonets Cannot Stand: A Comment on Mansfield's 'Strauss's Machiavelli,’’ Political Theory, vol. 3, no.4 (November): 385-401. 2006 〈先知與法官〉,肖 澗譯,收入劉小楓、陳少明主編,《馬基雅維利的喜劇》,北京:華夏出版社,第119-137頁。 Porter, Clifford F. 2000 ‘’The Interpretation of Nazi Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, Leo Strauss, and Eric Voegelin,’’ Ph. D. Dissertation, Claremont Graduate University. Rengger, N. J. 1995 Political Theory, Modernity and Postmodernity. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. Robertson, Neil G. 1988 ‘’The Closing of the Early Modern Mind: Leo Strauss and Early Modern Political Thought.’’ Animus 3 (1988) pp. 1-18. Rosen, Stanley 1987 Hermeneutics as Politics. New York and London: Oxford University Press. 1988 The Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry. New York and London: Routlege. 2000 ’’Leo Strauss and the Possibility of Philosophy’’ The Review of Metaphysics. 53(March 2000): 541-564. 2002a 〈作為政治的解釋學〉,宗成河譯,收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第191-261頁。 2002b 〈施特勞斯與古今之爭〉,宗成河譯,收入劉小楓主編,《施特勞斯與古典政治哲學》,上海:三聯書店,第359-378頁。 Schmitt, Carl 1996 The Concept of the Political .translated by George Schwab. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2005 《政治性的概念》,姚朝森譯,台北:聯經。 Sheppard, Eugene R. 2006 Leo Strauss and the Politics of Exile. NH:Brandeis University Press. Singh, Aakash 2005 Eros Turannos: Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve Debate on Tyranny. Lanham: University of Press Amrica. Smith, Steven B 2006 Reading Leo Strauss. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Sorensen, Kim 2003 ‘’Revelation and Reason in Leo Strauss’’ The Review of Politics. Summer 2003; 65,3. pp. 383-408. Tanguay,Daniel Leo Strauss: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Tarcov, Nathan 2004 ‘’Preface to The Japanese Translation of On Tyranny’’ in Perspectives on Political Science. Vol.33 No.4 Fall 2004.pp.221-226. Udolf, Alan, ed. 1991 Leo Struass’s Thought: Toward a Critical Engagement. Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner Publisher. Villa, Dana 2001 Socratic Citizenship. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Wood, Alan B. 1999 ‘’Creative Engagements: Strauss, Arendt, & Deleuze Reading Nietzsche,’’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University. Xenophon 1988 《追思錄—蘇格拉底的言行》,鄺健行(譯)。台北:聯經。 1994 Memorabilia. Translated and annotated by Amy L. Bonnette. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. 2005 《色諾芬的〈會飲〉》,沈默等(譯),北京:華夏出版社。 2007 《居魯士的教育》,沈默(譯箋),北京:華夏出版社。 Zantner, Scot J. 2005 〈哲人與城邦:雅法與施特勞斯學派〉,韓 銳譯,收入劉小楓主編,《美德可教嗎》,北京:華夏出版社,第25-57頁。 Zuckert, Michael 1978 ‘’Of Wary Physicians and Weary Readers: The Debate on Locke’s Way of Writing.’’ Independent Journal of Philosophy. 2(1978):55-66. Zuckert, Catherine H. 1997 Postmodern Platos: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Strauss, Derrida. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Zuckert, Catherine H. and Michael Zuckert 2006 The Truth about Leo Strauss. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40879 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文嘗試從「哲學與政治之關係」切入來重新理解史特勞斯的政治哲學,特別是其古典政治哲學的意涵,來重新掌握其特殊的政治哲學界定方式,筆者主要是針對史特勞斯在他學術生涯中最後十年所投入的對於「蘇格拉底問題」的研究與論述,而分別從亞里斯多芬尼的蘇格拉底(第二章)、色諾芬的蘇格拉底(第三章)與柏拉圖的蘇格拉底(第四章)來描述蘇格拉底的整體形象,並試圖探究在蘇格拉底問題中所呈現出來的「哲學與政治之爭」是否有調解或超越的可能性(第五章)。
喜劇詩人亞里斯多芬尼在《雲》一劇中所呈現出來的蘇格拉底做為哲學家的負面形象,一般皆被解讀為是對蘇格拉底的批判,但是史特勞斯卻認為亞里斯多芬尼是蘇格拉底的朋友,因為詩人提醒了哲學家其所追求的哲學生活對政治生活所具有的潛在危險性,以及哲學家應該對於自身所處的政治處境要有高度的自覺,而蘇格拉底的兩位學生色諾芬與柏拉圖對於其師哲學的辯護,史特勞斯就認為可以將其視為對詩人亞里斯多芬尼批判的一種回應,從而再度肯定「哲學生活」相對於「政治生活」的崇高與尊嚴。色諾芬在他的《會飲篇》、《回憶蘇格拉底》、《家政篇》都分別觸及到哲學生活的崇高性與哲學家對於城邦虔敬的自覺,而在《希耶羅》中更是具體呈現出哲學生活與政治生活之間對比與張力來,但史特勞斯在對《希耶羅》的解讀中得出哲學生活具有更高價值這樣的結論,柯耶夫卻不以為然,他認為不管是哲學家或政治人都是為「承認」而鬥爭,也就是說,這種生活方式並沒有本質上的差異,而在政治上對承認的欲望只有在「普遍同質國家」中才有可能充分滿足,而在這個國家實現之際,歷史就終結了,史特勞斯認為柯耶夫所謂的歷史終結,將導致哲學終結,從而使人性毀滅,沒有給哲學生活留下任何空間。柏拉圖的蘇格拉底在《理想國》中獲得最為具體的呈現,也從中認識到了政治生活的本質侷限。史特勞斯認為《理想國》中針對「哲學與政治之關係」問題所提出的答案是「政治權力要與哲學達成一致:哲學家必須是最高統治者,或最高統治者必須真正而充分地研究哲學」,但柏拉圖的結論是「正義城邦只存在於言辭之中」,雖然正義城邦現實不可能,柏拉圖轉而去探究「可能的最佳城邦」,但《法律篇》卻是從諸神信仰開始探討,這說明了柏拉圖的蘇格拉底已經意識到城邦公民對諸神信仰的虔敬,在政治生活中扮演最為關鍵的角色,從而成為哲學家必須正視的重大課題。 針對於「哲學與政治潛在衝突關係」的調解與超越,筆者嘗試整理出三個方案或論題來,分別是「亞里斯多德論題」、「柯耶夫論題」與「史特勞斯論題」。亞里斯多德也嘗試結合哲學與政治行動,哲學要在政治生活中實踐,而政治必須接受哲學引導,但與柏拉圖的蘇格拉底不同的是,亞里斯多德因為對社會多元性的承認,從而肯定了政治生活的高貴,並強調政治生活是個人美德實踐的條件。柯耶夫則在黑格爾傳統的影響下,希望建構一個「普遍同質國家」,在這樣一種政治統治型態中,原本哲學家的角色已經被知識份子所取代,知識份子將哲學家的抽象理論轉譯為具體政策建議而提供給統治者,哲學家隱身於實際政治生活的幕後。而史特勞斯則企圖在現代社會中,在學院中延續古典哲學精神的血脈,透過「博雅教育」(liberal education)的途徑來教育潛在的哲學家,這顯然是一個迫於情勢的折衷方案。而對於這三種調和論題的整體評估,筆者認為亞里斯多德提升了政治生活相對於哲學生活的位階,雖然他仍然肯定沈思生活或理論生活仍應該是個人的最終選擇,但哲學家在政治生活中所扮演的角色以不復以往的重要性。柯耶夫將政治生活的主導角色從哲學家轉到政治人或統治者,雖然哲學家的重要性以不再像古典政治哲學所說的那樣重要,不過這是一個符合現實的調整。史特勞斯試圖透過偉大經典的研讀來培育有潛力的哲學家,以此作為抗拒大眾文化的庸俗傾向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation demonstrates ‘’the problem of Socrates’’ in Strauss’s own writings. In the works of Aristophanes, Plato, and Xenophon, Strauss found out the main thesis of the problem of Socrates: the tension between philosophy and politics. Leo Strauss was devoted to the problem of Socrates in the last decade of his academic career, and he tried to capture the whole picture of Socrates by considering Aristophanes’ Socrates, Xenophon’s Socrates, and Plato’s Socrates, respectively.
In Aristophanes’ comedy Clouds, Socrates was a sophist and a natural philosopher. As a philosopher, the characteristic of Socrates was insanity and madness. According to Strauss, the poet Aristophanes was a friend of Socrates, and the poet had warned Socrates of philosophical life having a potential danger to politics. In response to Aristophanes’ critique, Xenophon’s and Plato’s Socrates both tried to defend the primacy of the philosophical life. In the interpretation of Xenophon’s Hiero, Strauss argued that the poet Simonides tamed a tyrant by confirming the debase of political life when compared to philosophical life. In the Republic of Plato, the philosopher-king was the best representation of tension between Philosopher and political community. ‘Polis or city in speech’ showed that two ways of life, philosophical and political, were difficult to reconcile, which is the immanent predicament in human world. To explore the possibilities of reconciling the tension between philosophy and politics, I introduce three theses respectively: the Aristotle’s thesis, Kojeve’s thesis, and the Strauss’s thesis. Aristotle tried to combine the philosophy and political action. On the one hand, he thought that we had to put philosophy into practice in the political life; on the other hand, the political rule must guild by philosophy. In Kojeve’s mind, when the time of ‘the universal and homogeneous state’ comes true, History has come to its end. If so, as Strauss said, the completion of History will reveal that the problem of the relation of philosophy and politics is insoluble. By means of ‘liberal education,’ I think that Leo Strauss did provide a viable solution to overcome the tension between philosophical life and political life in the modern time. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:04:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-D88322001-1.pdf: 6982808 bytes, checksum: 489401fd4844e1874b63cca97183956a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要•••••••••••••••••••••••••Ⅰ
英文摘要•••••••••••••••••••••••••Ⅲ 第一章 緒論•••••••••••••••••••••••1 第一節 問題緣起•••••••••••••••••••••1 第二節 現代性與古典政治哲學•••••••••••••••7 第三節 蘇格拉底問題••••••••••••••••••23 第二章 亞里斯多芬尼的蘇格拉底•••••••••••••31 第一節 喜劇詩人亞里斯多芬尼••••••••••••••31 第二節 詩人對政治哲學家的批判:對《雲》的分析•••••43 第三節 詩與哲學之爭••••••••••••••••••59 第三章 色諾芬的蘇格拉底•••••••••••••••••68 第一節 色諾芬與蘇格拉底••••••••••••••••74 第二節 哲學生活或政治生活?:史特勞斯對《希耶羅》的分析92 第三節 歷史終結或哲學終結?:柯耶夫與史特勞斯之爭•••106 第四節 色諾芬與馬基維利••••••••••••••••122 第四章 柏拉圖的蘇格拉底••••••••••••••••131 第一節 柏拉圖對話錄的戲劇性••••••••••••••132 第二節 《理想國》中的正義城邦•••••••••••••136 第三節 《法律篇》中的正義與虔敬••••••••••••158 第五章 哲學與政治之和解可能性•••••••••••••168 第一節 亞里斯多德論題•••••••••••••••••168 第二節 柯耶夫論題•••••••••••••••••••171 第三節 史特勞斯論題••••••••••••••••••175 第六章 結論••••••••••••••••••••••185 參考文獻••••••••••••••••••••••••189 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 史特勞斯與蘇格拉底問題:哲學與政治之間 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Leo Strauss and the Problem of Socrates:Between Philosophy and Politics | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡英文,蕭高彥,張福建,詹康 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 史特勞斯,蘇格拉底,亞里斯多芬尼,色諾芬,柏拉圖,政治哲學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Leo Strauss,Socrates,Aristophanes,Xenophon,Plato,modernity,political philosophy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 205 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。