請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40808完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊盛行(Shang-Shyng Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Shiang Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李文翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T17:01:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王三郎。1991。生物工學入門。藝軒圖書出版社。臺北,臺灣。
尤浚達。2005。石化工業年鑑。工研院產業經濟與資訊服務中心。新竹,臺灣。 左峻德。2006。發展能源作物內部經濟效益分析。行政院農委會農糧署九十五年度科技計畫研究報告。 行政院農委會。2007。作物生產:雜糧。2006年農業統計年報。行政院農委會。臺北,臺灣。pp. 36-39。 李良。1994。甘藷。蔡文福編。雜糧作物各論(III)根莖類。臺灣區雜糧發展基金會。pp.1327-1478。 吳建一、鍾宛真、葉修鋒。2006。固定化酵素之演進與展望。化工,53 : 175-198。 林忠亮、涂茂園、陳清涼、方炳勳、黃冬梨。2007。甘藷澱粉試量產生質酒精開發。石油季刊,43: 65-74。 林俊義。2006。國內外生質能源發展潛力與方向。林立夫、郭明朝、楊盛行、陳建源編。生質能源開發與利用。國立臺灣大學生化科技系、原子委員會核能研究所、行政院國家科學委員會、財團人臺灣武智紀念基金會。臺北,臺灣。pp. 39-55。 郭家倫、門立中、陳威希、湯俊彥。2005。我國發展生質酒精之推動策略報告。行政院核子能委員會核能研究所。桃園,臺灣。 郭博堯。2003。我國天然環境限制風力發電發展。財團法人國家政策研究基金會。臺北,臺灣。 陳文恆、郭家倫、黃文松、王嘉寶。2007。纖維酒精技術之發展。農業生技產業季刊,9: 62-69。 陳孝宇。2006。發展生質柴油和生質酒精對臺灣農業部門之影響分析。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所。碩士論文。臺北,臺灣。pp. 8-11。 陳國誠。1992。微生物酵素工程學。藝軒圖書出版社。臺北,臺灣。 陳國誠。2000。生物固定化技術與產業應用。茂昌圖書有限公司。臺北,臺灣。 福井三郎。1979。生体觸媒としての微生物。共立出版株式會社。東京,日本。pp. 101。 經濟部能源局。2006。能源指標。中華民國95年臺灣能源統計手冊。經濟部能源局。臺北,臺灣。pp. 16-17。 經濟部能源局。2007。我國重點能源科技研發動向及策略。2007年能源科技研究發展白皮書。經濟部能源局。臺北,臺灣。pp. 49-135。 臺灣經濟研究院。2007。全球能源情勢變遷對我國能源安全之影響與因應。臺灣經濟研究院。臺北,臺灣。 蔣宇紅、黃霞、俞毓馨。1993。幾種固定化細胞載體的比較。環境科學,14(1) : 11-15。 Abd-Aziz, S., Ang, D. C., Yusof, H. M., Karim, M. I. A., Ariff. A. B., Uchiyama, K., Shioya, S. 2001. Effect of C/N ratio and starch concentration on ethanol production from sago starch using recombinant yeast. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17: 713-719. Abouzied, M. M., Reddy, C. A. 1986. Direct fermentation of potato starch to ethanol by cocultures of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 52: 1055-1059. Ashok, P., Poonam, N., Carlos, R. S., Vanete, T. S., Dalel, S., Radjiskumar, M. 2003. Advances in microbial amylases. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 31: 135-152. Bernfeld, P. 1955. Amylases, αandβ. Methods in Enzymology 1:149-150. Beunink, J., Baumgärtl, H., Zimelka, W., Rehm, H. J. 1989. Determination of oxygen gradients in single Ca-alginate beads by means of oxygen-microelectrodes. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 45: 1041-1047. Casey, G. P., Ingledew, W. M. 1986. Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 13: 219-280. Carlsen, M., Nielsen, J., Villadsen, J. 1995. Kinetic studies of acid-inactivation of α-amylase from Aspergillus oryzae. Chemical Engineering Science 51: 37-43. Cheetham, P. S. J., Blunt, K. W., Bucke, C. 1979. Physical studies on cell immobilization using calcium alginate gels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 21: 2155-2168. Chibata, I. 1978. Preparation of immobilized enzymes and microbial cells. In: Chibata, I. (ed.) Immobilized Enzymes: Research and Development. Halsted Press, Inc., New York, NY. pp. 9-107. Ciani, M., Ferraro, L. 1998. Combined use of immobilized Candida stellata cells and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the quality of wines. Journal of Applied Microbiology 85: 247-254. Cot, M., Loret, M. O., Franęois, J., Benbadis, L. 2007. Physiological behaviourof Saccharomyces cerevisiae inaerated fed-batch fermentationfor high level production of bioethanol. FEMS Yeast Research 7: 22-32. Crueger, W., Crueger, A. 1989. Biotechnology: a Textbook of Industrial Microbiology, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA. pp. 189-218. Dombek, K. M., Ingram, L. O. 1984. Effect of ethanol on the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. Journal of Bacteriology 157: 233-239. Doran, P. M., Bailey, J. E. 1986. Effects of immobilization on growth, fermentation properties, and macromolecular composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae attached to gelatin. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 28: 73-87. Fischer, E., Stein, E. 1960.α-amylase. In: Boyer, P., Lardy, H., Myrback, K. (eds.), The Enzymes, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY. pp. 313. French, D. 1972. Fine structure of starch and its relationship to the organization of starch granules. Journal of the Japanese Society for Starch Science 19: 8-25. Fukui, S., Tanaka, A. 1982. Immobilized microbial cells. Annual Review of Microbiology 36: 145-172. Galazzo, J. L., Bailey, J. E. 1990a. Fermentation pathway kinetics and metabolic flux control in suspended and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 12: 162-172. Galazzo, J. L., Bailey, J. E. 1990b. Growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae in calcium-alginate beads induces cell alterations which accelerate glucose conversion to ethanol. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 36: 417-426. Gerbsch, N., Buchholz, R. 1995. New processes and actual trends in biotechnology. FEMS Microbiology Review 16:259-269. Grant, G. T., Morris, E. R., Rees, D. A., Smith, P. J., Thom, D. 1973. Biological interactions between polysaccharides and divalent cations: the egg-box model. FEBS Letters 32: 195-198. Hayashida S., Teramoto Y. 1986. Production and characteristics of raw-starch-digesting α-amylase from a protease-negative Aspergillus ficum Mutant. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 52: 1068-1073. Holcberg, I. B., Margalith, P. 1981. Alcoholic fermentation by immobilized yeast at high sugar concentrations. European Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13: 133-140. Horton, H. R., Moran, L. A., Ochs, R. S., Rawn, J. D., Scrimgeour, K. G. 2000. Carbohydrate metabolism I: Glycolysis. In: Principle of Biochemistry, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Inc., Saddle River, NJ. pp. 399. International Energy Agency, http://www.iea.org/ International Potato Center, http://www.cipotato.org/ Jack, T. R., Zajic, J. E. 1977. The immobilization of whole cells. In: Fiechter, A. (ed.), Advances Biochemical Engineering, Vol 5. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York, NY. pp. 125-145. Jones, R. P., Greenfield, P. F. 1987. Ethanol and the fluidity of the yeast plasma membrane. Yeast 3: 223-232. Katchalski-katzir, K. 1993. Immobilized enzymes-learning from past successes and failures. Trends in Biotechnology 11: 471-478. Kurosawa, H., Nomura, N., Tanaka, H. 1988. Ethanol production from starch by a coimmobilized mixed culture system of Aspergillus awamori and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 33: 716-723. Lee, S. W., Ebata, T., Liu, Y. C., Tanaka, H. 1993. Co-immobilization of three strains of microorganisms and its application in ethanol production from raw starch under unsterile conditions. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 75: 36-42. Lehninger, A. L., Nelson, D. L., Cox, M. M. 1993. Carbohydrated. In: Lehninger, A. L., Nelson, D. L., Cox, M. M. (eds.), Principles of Biochemistry, 2nd ed. Worth Publishers, Inc., New York, NY. pp. 309. Li, L., Fang, Y., Vreeker, R., Appelqvist, I. 2007. Reexamining the egg-box model in calcium-alginate gels with x-ray diffraction. Biomacromolecules 8: 464-468. Lineback, D. R. 1984. The starch granule organization and properties. Bakers Digest 58: 16-17. Miller, G. L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalycilic acid for determining reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry 31: 426-428. Nagar-Legmann, R., Margalith, P. 1987. A comparative study of the lipid composition of yeasts with different fermentative capacities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 26: 49-54. Nikuni, Z. 1978. Studies on starch granules. Starch 30: 105-111. Nowak, J. 2001. Comparison of polish industrial distillery yeast with ethanol producing bacterial Zymomonas mobilis. Food Science and Technology 4: 73-89. Núñez, M. J., Lema, J. M. 1987. Cell immobilization: Application to alcohol production. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 9: 642-651. Onsøyen, E. 1997. Alginates. In: Imeson, A. (ed.), Thickening and Gelling Agents for Food, 2nd ed. Blackie Academic and Professional. London. pp. 22-44. Postgate, J. P. 1967. Viable counts and viability. In: Norris, J. R., Ribbons, D. W. (eds.), Methods in Microbiology, Vol 1. Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY. pp. 611–628. Postgate, J. R. 1967. Viability measurements and the survival of microbes under minimum stress. Advances in Microbial Physiology I: 1-23. Rose, D. 1976. Yeast for molasses alcohol. Process Biochemistry 11: 10-12. Smidsrød, O., Skjåk-Bræk, G. 1990. Alginate as immobilization matrix for cells. Trends in Biotechnology 8: 71-78. Smith, B. W., Roe, J. H. 1948. A photometric method for the determination of α-amylase in blood and urine, with use of the starch-iodine color. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 179: 53-59. Sugama, S., Okazaki, N. 1979. Growth estimation of Aspergillus oryzae culture on solid media. Journal of Fermentation Technology 57: 408-412. Tanaka, H., Kruosawa, H., Mruakami, H. 1985. Ethanol production from starch by a coimmobilized mixed culture system of Aspergillus awamori and Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 28: 1761-1768. Tsai, W. T., Lan, H. F., Lin, D. T. 2008. An analysis of bioethanol utilized as renewable energy in the transportation sector in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: 1364-1382. Thomsen, A. B., Medina, C., Ahring, B. K. 2003. Biotechnology in ethanol production. In: Larsen, H., Kossmann, J., Petersen, L. S. (eds.), Risø Energy Report 2. Risø National Laboratory. pp.40-44. Thomas, D. S., Hossack, J. A., Rose, A. H. 1978. Plasma-membrane lipid composition and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Archives of Microbiology 117: 239-245. Thomas, K. C., Ingledew, W. M. 1990. Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mashes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56: 2046-2050. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1998. Excerpt from Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. pp. 20. (http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php) Van Neerven, A. R. W., Wijffels, R. H., Zehnder, A. J. B. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy of immobilized bacteria in gel beads: a comparative study of fixation methods. Journal of Microbiological Methods 11: 157-168. Wang, J. L., Han, L. P., Shi, H. C., Qian, Y. 2001. Biodegradation of quinoline by gel immobilized Burkholderia sp. Chemosphere 44: 1041-1046. Wang, S. S., Vieth, W. R. 1973. Collagen-enzyme complex membranes and their performance in biocatalytic modules. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 15: 93-115. Woodward, J. 1988. Methods of immobilization of microbial cells. Journal of Microbiological Methods 8: 91-102. Yabuki, M., Ono, N., Hoshino, K., Fukui S. 1977. Rapid induction of α-Amylase by nongrowing mycelia of Aspergillus oryzae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 34: 1-6. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40808 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 生質酒精開發應用已成為現今再生能源發展方針,甘藷易於栽培且各地均可種植,十分適宜作為能源作物。目前以澱粉為原料轉化生成酒精,仍多採用水解與醱酵分離之二階段製程,若能藉由共固定系統同時進行兩項步驟,將可降低生產成本、提高酒精產量。
本研究利用糖化菌與Saccharomyces cerevisiae所組成之共固定系統,以批次醱酵將甘藷澱粉轉化生成酒精,並探討最適醱酵條件。當固定化酵母於添加6%酒精之10% glucose YPD培養時,最大醱酵效率80.23%,酵母生存能力95.70%,較游離細胞高,耐糖性試驗亦具同樣結果,可見固定化確實可提升酵母之耐受性。Aspergillus oryzae及Monascus purpureus有較高之α-amylase活性(8.43, 7.65 U/mL)及glucoamylase活性(12.22, 10.42 U/mL)。當A. oryzae菌絲與S. cerevisiae共固定化時,膠體硬化時間15分鐘、 pH 4.0、溫度30℃及轉速150rpm條件下,培養13天可得最大酒精濃度3.05%(v/v),YE/s值為0.31。若以M. purpureus菌絲與S. cerevisiae進行共固定,其最佳膠體硬化時間60分鐘,於pH 4.0、溫度30℃及轉速150rpm條件下培養13天,最大酒精濃度3.17%(v/v),YE/s值為0.37。 當混合糖化菌與S. cerevisiae共固定化時,A. oryzae與M. purpureus以比例2:1混合,醱酵11天可得最大酒精濃度3.84%(v/v)及YE/s值0.39; 若A. oryzae與 M. purpureus以比例1:2共固定化,醱酵9天可得最大酒精濃度4.08%(w/v)及YE/s值0.41。顯示混合糖化菌與酵母之共固定化有助於提升酒精產量及縮短醱酵時間。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The development and application of bioethanol is the main set goals of Taiwan’s renewable energy policy in recent years. The properties of sweet potato including its easy growth and adaptation to many farming conditions have made it to be considered as a major energy crop. Presently, ethanol fermentation processes from starchy materials normally involves two stages, hydrolysis and fermentation. Therefore, direct ethanol from starch by co-immobilization would both reduce production cost and increase ethanol yield.
This study investigated the bioethanol production from sweet potato by co-immobilization of saccharolytic molds (Aspergillus oryzae, Monascus purpureus) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae under batch fermentation and optimal parameters for fermentation were analyzed to obtain maximum ethanol production. The results showed that immobilized yeast cells had the maximum fermentation rate of 80.23% and 95.70% cell viability when cultivated under 10% glucose YPD and 6% ethanol. This indicates immobilization enhances the ethanol tolerance capacity of yeast cells, and glucose tolerance test had the same. The α-amylase activities of A. oryzae and M. purpureus were 8.43 and 7.65 U/mL whereas the glucoamylase activities were 12.22 and 10.42 U/mL, respectively. During the co-immobilization of S. cerevisiae with A. oryzae or M. purpureus, the optimal hardening time of gel beads were 15 and 60 min, the bioethanol production were 3.05 and 3.17%(v/v), and YE/s were 0.31 and 0.37 at pH 4, 30℃ and 150 rpm for 13 days of fermentation, respectively. In co-immobilization of S. cerevisiae and mixed molds while A. oryzae and M. purpureus mixed ratio was 2:1, the bioethanol production was 3.84%(v/v), and YE/s was 0.39 after 11 days of fermentation, whereas A. oryzae and M. purpureus mixed ratio was 1:2, the bioethanol production was 4.08%(v/v), and YE/s was 0.41 after 9 days of fermentation. This study demonstrated that co-immobilization of S. cerevisiae and mixed molds would both reduce fermentation time and increase ethanol yield. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:01:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95b47404-1.pdf: 2117004 bytes, checksum: f1ce529ed00b302b5fa858c69067bdd1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌......................................................i
中文摘要.................................................ii Abstract................................................iii 表目錄.................................................viii 圖目錄....................................................x 第一章 緒論...............................................1 1.1 研究背景與目的........................................1 1.2 國際能源發展..........................................3 1.2.1 京都議定書..........................................4 1.2.2 國際原油............................................6 1.3 臺灣能源政策目標......................................7 1.4 生質能源..............................................8 1.4.1 生質能源定義........................................8 1.4.2 生質能源和其他再生能源..............................8 1.5 生質酒精概況.........................................12 1.5.1 生質酒精...........................................12 1.5.2 生質酒精製造.......................................13 1.5.3 臺灣產製生質酒精最適料源分析.......................15 1.6 甘藷.................................................17 1.7 澱粉組成.............................................19 1.8 澱粉水解酵素.........................................21 1.9 固定化技術...........................................23 1.9.1 固定化技術及方法...................................23 1.9.2 固定化優點及特性...................................34 第二章 材料與方法........................................35 2.1 實驗材料.............................................35 2.1.1 菌種來源...........................................35 2.1.2 培養基配製.........................................35 2.1.3 醱酵瓶裝置.........................................38 2.2 實驗方法.............................................39 2.2.1 實驗架構...........................................39 2.2.2 菌種活化及前培養...................................40 2.2.3 酵母菌生長曲線及生存能力分析.......................40 2.2.4 固定化酵母製備.....................................40 2.2.5 游離及固定化酵母對酒精之耐受性.....................41 2.2.6 游離及固定化酵母之耐糖性...........................41 2.2.7 澱粉分解酵素活性檢測...............................41 2.2.8 糖化菌α-amylase及glucoamylase活性分析..............42 2.2.9 固定糖化菌體量對甘藷澱粉水解能力...................42 2.2.10 共固定膠體硬化時間對酒精生成之影響................42 2.2.11 酵母菌與糖化菌共固定之探討........................42 2.2.12 共固定膠體最佳醱酵初始pH值........................43 2.2.13 混合糖化菌與酵母之共固定..........................43 2.3 分析方法.............................................43 2.3.1 酵母菌體濃度.......................................43 2.3.2 細胞生存能力.......................................43 2.3.3 α-amylase活性......................................45 2.3.4 Glucoamylase活性...................................46 2.3.5 還原醣含量.........................................46 2.3.6 甘藷澱粉含量.......................................46 2.3.7 酒精含量...........................................46 2.3.8 掃瞄式電子顯微鏡觀察...............................47 第三章 結果與討論........................................48 3.1 Saccharomyces cerevisiae BCRC 21494生長曲線及細胞生存能力.......................................................48 3.2 游離及固定化酵母之酒精耐受性.........................50 3.3 游離及固定化酵母之耐糖性.............................53 3.4 澱粉酶活性檢測.......................................56 3.5 糖化菌α-amylase及glucoamylase活性....................58 3.6 糖化菌體固定量對甘藷澱粉水解能力.....................61 3.7 A. oryzae與S. cerevisiae共固定化.....................64 3.7.1 共固定A. oryzae及S. cerevisiae膠體硬化時間對酒精生成影響.....................................................64 3.7.2 最適酵母菌體量與A. oryzae共固定....................67 3.7.3 初始pH值對A. oryzae與S. cerevisiae共固定膠體醱酵影響.......................................................70 3.7.4 A. oryzae與S. cerevisiae共固定膠體SEM觀測..........72 3.8 M. purpureus與S. cerevisiae共固定化..................75 3.8.1 共固定M. purpureus及S. cerevisiae膠體硬化時間對酒精生成影響...................................................75 3.8.2 最適酵母菌體量與M. purpureus共固定.................78 3.8.3 初始pH值對M. purpureus與S. cerevisiae共固定膠體醱酵影響.......................................................81 3.8.4 M. purpureus與S. cerevisiae共固定膠體SEM觀測.......83 3.9 混合糖化菌與S. cerevisiae共固定化....................85 第四章 結論..............................................91 第五章 參考文獻..........................................93 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 醱酵 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共固定化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生質酒精 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 甘藷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 澱粉酶 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Bioethanol | en |
| dc.subject | Sweet potato | en |
| dc.subject | Amylase | en |
| dc.subject | Co-immobilization | en |
| dc.subject | Fermentation | en |
| dc.title | 以共固定糖化菌及Saccharomyces cerevisiae生產甘藷生質酒精 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Production of Bioethanol from Sweet Potato by Co-immobilizaton of Saccharolytic Molds and Saccharomyces cerevisiae | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方鴻源(Hung-Yuan Fang),林憲秋,許瑞祥(Ruey-Shyang Hseu),黃慶璨(Ching-Tsan Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 共固定化,生質酒精,甘藷,澱粉酶,醱酵, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Co-immobilization,Bioethanol,Sweet potato,Amylase,Fermentation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 微生物與生化學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 微生物學科所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.07 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
