請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40783
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯志哲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ju-Yen Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃汝嬿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T17:00:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
中國時報,2008/07/01,企業縮手 3成2減少正職聘僱 王志傑,2008,非典型僱用:決定因素及其對組織階層化的影響,國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 尹曉穎,1994,國營事業人員精簡方案與被留用員工之組織行為的關係,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 行政院勞工委員會勞動統計調查—民國96年人力需求調查 http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/com/statinvest.htm 成之約,1999,淺論「非典型聘僱關係」工作形態的發展與影響,《勞工行政》,139:10-18。 柯志哲,2003,非典型工作型態之分析與探討計畫,行政院勞工委員會調查報告。 陳錦慧,2002,非典型聘僱的決定因素及績效之探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。 曹采華,2002,員工特徵對工作滿意、組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的影響—以派遣人員為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 應建民,2006,使用非正職人員的程度對正職人員的勞資關係品質與工作保障的影響,國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 劉芳君,2003,組織人力精簡對留任員工之態度和行為及組織績效關係之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文 Bridges, W., 張美惠 譯,1995,新工作潮,時報文化。 Handy, C., 施純菁 譯,1998,組織寓言:韓第給管理者的21個觀點,天下文化。 英文部分 Allan, P., & Sienko, S. 1998. Job motivations of professional and technical contingent workers: are they different from permanent workers? Journal of Employment Counseling, 35(4):169-178. Allen, T. D., Freeman, D. M., Russell, J. A., Reizenstein, R. C., & Rentz, J. O. 2001. Survivor reactions to organizational downsizing: Does time ease the pain? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74:145-164. Astrachan, J. H. 1995. Organizational departures: the impact of separation anxiety as studied in a mergers and acquisitions simulation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(1):31-50. Barnett, W. P., & Miner, A. S. 1992. Standing on the shoulders of others: Career interdependence in job mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2):262-281. Baruch, Y., & Hind, P. 2000. “Survivor syndrome”-a management myth? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1):29-45. Beylerian, M., & Kleiner, B. H. 2002. The downsized workplace. Nonprofit World, 20(3):30-32. Bishop, J. W., Goldsby, M. G., & Neck, C. P. 2001. Who goes? Who cares? Who stays? Who wants to ? The role of contingent workers and corporates layoff practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(4):298-315. Brockner, J. 1992. Managing the effects of layoffs on survivors. California Management Review, winter:9-28. Broschak, J. P., & Davis-Blake, A. 2006. Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 371-393. Broschak, J. P., Davis-Blake, A., & Block, E. S. 2008. Nonstandard, not substandard: The relationship among work arrangements, work attitudes, and job performance. Work and Occupations, 35(3):3-43. Burke, R. J., & Nelson, D. 1998. Mergers and acquisitions, downsizing, and privatization: a North American perspective. In M. K. Gowing, J. D. Kraft, & J. C. Quick(Eds), The new organizational reality: Downsizing, restructuring, and revitalization(pp. 21-54). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association. Cameron, K. S. 1994. Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource Management, 33(2):189-211. Cappelli, P., & Neumark, D. 2004. External churning and internal flexibility: Evidence on the functional flexibility and core-periphery hypotheses. Industrial Relations, 43(1):148-182. Cascio, W. F. 1993. Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? Academy of Management Executive, 7(1):95-104. Cascio, W. F. 2002. Responsible restructuring: creative and profitable alternatives to layoffs. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.: San Francisco. Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. 2006. Different temporary work status, different behaviors in organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(3):351-367. Connelly, C. E., & Gallagher, D. G.. 2004. Emerging trends in contingent work research. Journal of Management, 30:959-983. Cordova, E. 1986. From full-time wage employment to atypical employment: A major shift in the evolution of labour relations? International Labour Review, 125(6):641-657. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M, Morrow, P. C., & Kessler, I. 2006. Serving two organizations: Exploring the employment relationship of contracted employees. Human Resource Management, 45(4):561-583. Davis-Blake, A., & Uzzi, B. 1993. Determinants of employment externalization: a study of temporary workers and independent contractors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:195-223. Davis-Blake, A., Broschak, J.P., & George, E. 2003. Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal, 46:475-485. De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. 2006. The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well-being and behavioural reports: a psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79:395-409. De Gilder, D. 2003. Commitment, trust and work behaviour: the case of contingent workers. Personnel Review, 32(5):588-604. Ellingson, J. E., Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. 1998. Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83:913-921. Feather, N. T., & Rauter, K. A. 2004. Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77:81-94. Freeman, S. J., & Cameron, K. S. 1993. Organizational downsizing: A convergence and reorientation framework. Organization Science, 4(1):10-29. Fullerton, A. S., & Wallace, M. 2007. Traversing the flexible turn: US workers’ perceptions of job security, 1977-2002. Social Science Research, 36:201-221. Geary, J. F. 1992. Employment flexibility and human resource management: The case of three American electronics plants. Work, Employment & Society, 6:251-270. George, E. 2003. External solution and internal problems: The effects of employment externalization on internal workers’ attitudes. Organization Sciences, 14:386-402. George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. 2005. One foot in each camp: The dual identification of contract workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1):68-99. Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. 1984. Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3):438-448. Handel, H. J. 2005. Trends in perceived job quality, 1989 to 1998. Work and Occupations, 32:66-93. Hartley, J., Jacobson, D., Klandermans, B., & van Vurren, T. 1991. Job insecurity: coping with jobs at a risk. London: Sage. Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F., & Hudson, K. 2000. Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relation and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 65:256-278. Kalleberg, A. L. 2000. Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26:341-365. Kim, W.-B. 2003. Economic crisis, downsizing and “layoff survivor’s syndrome.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 33(4):449-464. Klein Hesselink, D. J., & van Vuuren, T. 1991. Job flexibility and job insecurity: The Dutch case. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8:273-293. Ko, J.-J. R. 2003. Contingent and internal employment systems: Substitutes or complements? Journal of Labor Research, 24(3):473-490. Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J., & Linden, R. C. 2005. The role of job security in Understanding the relationship between employees’ perceptions of temporary workers and employees’ performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2):389-398. Lautsch, B. A. 2002. Uncovering and explaining variance in the features and outcomes of contingent work. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(1): 23-43. Lee, D. R. 1996. Why is flexible employment increasing? Journal of Labor Research, 17(4):543-553. Logan, N., O’Reilly, C. A. III, & Roberts, K. H. 1973. Job satisfaction among part-time and full-time employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3:33-41. McGinnis, S. K., & Morrow, P. C. 1990. Job attitudes among full- and part-time employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36:82-96. McKinley, W. S., Sanchez, C. M., & Schick, A. G. 1995. Organizational downsizing: Constraining, cloning, learning. Academy of Management Executive, 9(3):32-44. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. 2001. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1):61-89. Mishra, K. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Mishra, A. K. 1998. Preserving employee morale during downsizing. Sloan Management Review, 39:83-95. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14:224-247. Nollen, S., & Axel, H. 1996. Managing contingent workers: how to reap the benefits and reduce the risks. American Management Association: New York. O’Reilly, B. 1994. What companies and employees owe one another. Fortune, 129(12):44-52. Osthus, S. 2007. For better or worse? Workplace changes and the health and well-being of Norweign workers. Work Employment Society, 21:731-750. Pearce, J. L. 1993. Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers:their psychological involvement and effects on employee co-workers. Academy of Management Journal, 36:1082-1096. Pearce, J. L. 1998. Job insecurity is important, but not for the reasons you might think: The example of contingent workers. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 10:31-46. Polivka, A. E., & Nardone, T. 1989. The definition of contingent work. Monthly Labor Review, 112:9-16. Price, J. 1997. Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18(4/5):305-558. Rousseau, D. M. 1995. Psychological contracts in organization: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. SAGE Publications. California: Thousand Oaks. Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. 1975. Job Satisfaction indicators and their correlates. American Behavioral Scientist, 18:333-3368. Segal, L. M., & Sullivan, D. G. 1997. The growth of temporary services work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11:117-136. Shah, P. P. 2000. The structural implications of downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1):101-112. Smith, V. 1997. New forms of work organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 23:315-339. Sparrow, P. 1998. The pursuit of multiple and parallel organizational flexibilities: Reconstituting jobs. European Journal of work and Organizational Psychology, 7:79-95 Stroh, L. K., & Reilly, A. H. 1997. Loyalty in the age of downsizing. Sloan Management Review, summer:83-88. Summers, C. W. 1997. Contingent employment in the United States. Comparative Labor Law Journal, 18:503-522. Sverke, M. 2003. Uncertain employment relations and union membership in Europe editorial introduction. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(2):139-148. Sverke, M., & Hellgren, J. 2002. The nature of job insecurity: Understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(1):23-42. Thorsteinson, T. J. 2003. Job attitudes of part-time vs. full-time workers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76:151-177. Tsai, P. C.-F., Yen, Y.-F., Huang, L.-C., & Huang, I.-C. 2007. A study on motivating employees’ learning commitment in the post-downsizing era: Job satisfaction perspective. Journal of World Business, 42:157-169. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40783 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去的二十多年間,無論是在西方工業國家或是亞洲新興工業國家,勞動者的工作生活都起了很大的變化。在面臨競爭壓力的情況下,企業組織為了增加彈性及提高生產力,進而在人力運用制度上有所改變,隨之而來的僱傭關係轉變也對工作者帶來不同層面的影響。本研究即針對組織內的正職員工,探討組織使用非典型工作者及進行裁員等兩項人力策略,對正職員工所帶來在組織情感性承諾、工作滿意度、知覺到的主管與員工關係及工作保障等面向的影響,企圖對
台灣工作者的工作生活有更進一步的認識。 研究結果發現組織使用非典型工作者的程度會使正職員工自認其被非典型工作者取代的可能性提高,然而在其他面向則無顯著影響;裁員幅度也會提高正職員工自認其被非典型工作者取代的可能性,對其知覺到的主管與員工關係則具有低度顯著的負面影響,在其他面向則無顯著影響。 本研究除了探討兩項人力措施對正職員工的直接影響之外,還進一步考慮組織使用非典型工作者的程度對裁員幅度的調節作用。研究結果發現,在加入交互作用項後,組織使用非典型工作者的程度會負向影響正職員工的工作滿意度及知覺到的主管與員工關係;裁員幅度則會負向影響正職員工的工作滿意度、知覺到的主管與員工關係,及正向影響擔心失去工作的程度。此外,組織使用非典型工作者的程度還能減緩裁員幅度對正職員工的工作滿意度、知覺到的主管與員工關係及擔心失去工作的程度之影響,顯示出在台灣職場中,非典型工作者對正職員工所帶來的影響不盡然是負面的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past two decades, employees have faced dramatic changes in working life in the western industrialized countries as well as in the newly developing countries in Asia. Under the pressure of competition, many organizations have changed their human resource practices in order to be more flexible and improve competitiveness, and thus have greatly affected its permanent employees. This article focuses on how do human resource practices (i.e. using nonstandard workers and layoff) influence permanent employees’ affective commitment, job satisfaction, perceptions of relations between managers and employees and perceived job security.
This study finds that the extent of using nonstandard workers would positively affect permanent employees’ feelings of being replaced by nonstandard workers, but it did not have effects on other independent variables. The extent of layoff would also positively affect permanent employees’ feelings of being replaced by nonstandard workers, and negatively affect their perceptions of relations between managers and employees, though the effect was marginally significant. The extent of layoff did not have effects on other independent variables. The present study also considered the extent of using nonstandard workers as a moderator. According to the results of regression models with interaction term, this study finds that the extent of using nonstandard workers had a negative effect on permanent employees’ job satisfaction and the perceptions of relations between managers and employees. The extent of layoff had a negative effect on permanent employees’ job satisfaction and the perceptions of relations between managers and employees while it also had a positive effect on permanent employees’ worries about losing their jobs. Besides, the extent of using nonstandard workers would mitigate the effect of the extent of layoff on permanent employees’ job satisfaction, the perceptions of relations between managers and their worries about losing jobs. This result reveals that, in Taiwan, using nonstandard workers will not necessarily have negative effects on permanent employees in the workplace. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T17:00:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95325011-1.pdf: 450434 bytes, checksum: fdf3a66a245af8f0ad1a2c2053fd2e5c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 研究背景與動機 1
第二章 研究目的 7 第三章 文獻探討 9 第一節 非典型工作安排(atypical/nonstandard work arrangement) 9 第二節 組織的情感性承諾 14 第三節 工作滿意度(job satisfaction) 17 第四節 主管與員工關係 19 第五節 知覺到的工作保障(perceived job security) 20 第六節 人力精簡(employment downsizing) 23 第七節 使用非典型工作者的程度與其對裁員幅度的調節作用 31 第四章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究架構與研究假說 33 第二節 研究變項 36 第三節 資料與分析方法 42 第五章 資料分析與統計結果 44 第一節 整體樣本描述統計結果 44 第二節 研究樣本人口統計變項及組織特徵次數分配情形 49 第三節 研究變項描述統計 53 第四節 迴歸分析與假說驗證 62 第五節 組織使用非典型工作者的程度之調節作用 73 第六章 結論與建議 79 第一節 研究結論 79 第二節 討論 82 第三節 研究限制與建議 84 參考資料 86 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 組織人力運用制度變革對正職員工之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Employment Practices Change on Permanent Employees | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 韓志翔,葉穎蓉 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 非典型工作者,裁員,工作生活,情感性承諾,工作滿意度,勞資關係,工作保障, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | nonstandard workers,layoff,working life,affective commitment,job satisfaction,industrial relations,job security, | en |
dc.relation.page | 93 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 439.88 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。