Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 昆蟲學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40527
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor楊平世
dc.contributor.authorYaw-Long Yangen
dc.contributor.author楊燿隆zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T16:50:16Z-
dc.date.available2008-08-05
dc.date.copyright2008-08-05
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-07-29
dc.identifier.citation山中正夫。1971。台灣產蝶類的分布(1)。日本鱗翅學會特別報告5:115- 193。
山中正夫。1972。台灣產蝶類的分布(2)。蝶與蛾23(1):1-48。
山中正夫。1973。台灣產蝶類的分布(3)。蝶與蛾23(2):1-31。
山中正夫。1974。台灣產蝶類的分布(4)。蝶與蛾25(1):1-60。
山中正夫。1975。台灣產蝶類的分布(5)。蝶與蛾26(1):1-100。
山中正夫。1980。台灣產蝶類的分布(6) 。蝶與蛾30 增附1:1-141.
中華民國台灣蝶類生態調查隊報告書。1967。日本鱗翅學會特別報告。3:1-60。
內田春男,1999。フォルモサの森を舞う妖精 台湾産ゼフィルス25種。自費出版。沼津。
方懷聖、楊燿隆。2006。蝴蝶資源永續利用及重要棲息地保育研究。行政院農委會特有生物研究保育中心95年度試驗研究計畫執行成果。283-300頁。
方懷聖。2002。蘭嶼珠光鳳蝶保育之現況。野生動物保護基金會編:瀕臨絕種生物的保育生物學研習會論文集:69-80。
白水隆。1960。原色台灣蝶類大圖鑑。保育社。
朱耀沂、山中正夫。1973。台灣昆蟲採集新舊地點對照表。台灣省立博物館年刊,16:31~72。
朱耀沂、山中正夫。1975。台灣昆蟲採集新舊地點對照表(續)。台灣省立博物館年刊,18:121~150。
吳楨澤。1999。影響山地鄉原住民參與共同資源維護因素之研究-以嘉義縣山美村鯝魚復育為例。國立中興大學農業推廣教育研究所。碩士論文。
李大維。2007。都市棲地之蝶相暨蜜源植物研究-以台中市景賢生態公園為例。特有生物研究9(1): 37-49。
李依紋。2007。台灣蝴蝶分布的時空變遷。國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文。85頁。
李惠永、楊平世。2002。國有林蝶類重要棲地及資源─中部地區。行政院農業委員會林務局。
李惠永、楊平世。2003。國有林蝶類重要棲地及資源─南部地區。行政院農業委員會林務局。
李惠永、楊平世。2004。國有林蝶類重要棲地及資源─東部地區。行政院農業委員會林務局。
李瓊如。2001。山美鄒族從事達娜伊谷溪資源管理之探討。國立台中師範學院環境教育研究所。碩士論文。
沈招馨。2007。台北市立動物園蝴蝶公園蝶相監測之研究。台北市立教育大學環教育與資源研究所碩士論文。100頁。
周樑鎰、方尚仁、朱耀沂。1992。台灣昆蟲資源調查及其資料庫。〝台灣生物資源調查及資訊管理研習會〞論文集(彭鏡毅編) 。中央研究社植物研究所專刊第11號.pp207-219。
林務局。1999。森林昆蟲─導讀手冊。林務局。台北。155頁。
林穎萱。2003。蝴蝶生態教育園規劃設計準則之探討。國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。
依婉•貝林。2006。Utux、空間、記憶與部落建構---以alang Tongan 與alang Sipo 為主的討論。國立東華大學民族發展研究所碩士論文。
徐堉峰、李宜欣、楊平世。2003。台灣地區蝶類外來種現況。入侵種生物管理研討會論文集: 138-148。
徐堉峰。2006。寬尾鳳蝶復育計畫。行政院農委會林務局保育研究計畫系列94-12號。
晏華、袁興中、劉文萍、鄧合黎。2006。城市化對蝴蝶多樣性的影響:以重慶市為例。生物多樣性 14(3): 216-222。
貢穀紳。1996。昆蟲學。下冊。國立中興大學農學院出版委員會。
陳建志、吳怡欣、朱耀沂。2002。蝴蝶公園中蝴蝶與蜜源植物之關係探討。動物園學報14: 21-37。
陳建志。1996。台北動物園蝴蝶公園之蝶類群聚研究。國立台灣大學植物病蟲害學研究所博士論文。150頁。
陳振寧。曾陽。2001。清海祁連地區不同生境類型蝴蝶多樣性研究。生物多樣性 9:109–114。
陳維壽。1974。台灣區蝶類大圖鑑。中國文化雜誌社。
楊平世。2001。國有林蝶類重要棲地及資源:北部地區。林務局保育研究系列89-10號。
楊燿隆、方懷聖。2006。蘭嶼地區港口馬兜林鈴環境需求及重要種植區域初探。特有生物研究8(1): 27-34。
楊燿隆。1999。台灣中部地區蝴蝶資源。特有生物研究1(1): 28-48。
歐聖榮。1999。南投縣仁愛鄉南豐村夢谷觀光農園整體發展調查規劃報告書。行政院農業委員會。
濱野榮次。1987。台灣蝶類生態大圖鑑。牛頓出版社。
鄭晃二。2001。南豐村休閒農業觀光帶整體規劃期末報告書。淡江大學。
Amarnath, G., M. S. R. Murthy, S. J. Ritto, G. Rajashekar and C. B. S. Dutt. 2003. Diagnotic analysis of conservation zones using remote sensing and GIS techniques in wet evergreen forest of the Western Ghats – An ecological hotspot, Tamil Nadu, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 2331-2359.
Anderson M. C. 1964. Studies in woodland light climate. I. The photographic computation of light conditions. J. Ecology 542:27-41.
Araujo M. B., W. Thuiller, P. H. Williams and I. Reginster. 2005. Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning. Global Ecol. Biogeogr 14:17–30
Aviron, S., P. Jeanneret, B. Schüpbach, and F. Herzog. 2007. Effects of agri-environmental measures, site and landscape conditions on butterfly diversity of Swiss grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 122:295-304.
Barkin,D, 2003. Allevating poverty through ecotourism: promises and reality in the monarch butterfly reserve of Mexico.Environment Development and Sustainability 5:371-382.
Batisse, M. 1986. Developing and focusing the Biosphere Reserve concept. Nature and Resources 22(3):1-2
Batisse, M. 1986. Development of the Biosphere Reserve Concept. Nature and Resources, Vol. XXII, No. 3, p2-11 July-September, 1986,.
Baz, A., and A. Garcia-Boyero. 1996. The SLOSS dilemma: a butterfly case study. Biodiversity and Conservation 5(4):493-502.
Bazzaz, F.A. 1979. The physiological ecology of succession. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 351–371.
Blair R. B., and A. E. Launer. 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation, 80, 113–125.
Bojórquez-Tapia, L. A., L. P. Brower, G. Castilleja, S. Sánchez-Colón, M. Hernández, W. Calvert, S. Díaz, P. Gómez-Priego and G. Alcantar, E. D. Melgarejo, M. J. Solares, L. Gutiérrez, M. D. L. Juárez. 2003. Mapping Expert Knowledge: Redesigning the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve. Conservation Biology 17 (2): 367–379
Brody S. D., W. Highfield, S. Arlikatti, D. Bierling H., R. M. Ismailova, L. Lee and R. Butzler. 2004. Conflict on the coast: using geographic information systems to map potential environmental disputes in Matagorda Bay, Texas. Environ. Manag. 34:11–25
Cabeza, M., M. B. Araújo, R. J. Wilson, C. D. Thomas, M. J. R. Cowley and A. Moilanen. 2004. Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design Journal of Applied Ecology 41 (2): 252–262
Cescatti, A. 2007. Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 143: 1–12.
Chang K. T. 2001. Introduction to geographic information system. McGraw-Hill Science.
Chazdon, R. L., and C. B. Field. 1987. Photographic estimation of photosynthetically active radiation: evaluation of a computerized technique. Oecologia 73: 525–532.
Chiba, H., Y. F. Hsu, T. Shirozu. 1992 Papilionoidea. IN: Heppner JB, Inoue H (eds) Lepidoptera of Taiwan. Vol.1, Part2: Checklist. Scientific Publishers.
Choi, S. W. 2004. Trends in butterflies species richness in response to the peninsular effect in South Korea. J. Biogeogr 31:587–592
Chu, Y. I., and H. A. King. 1973. Notes on the replacement of the Formosan cabbage worm (Pieris canidia Linn'e) by the imported cabbage worm (Pieris rapae Boisdubal). P. pro. Bull. 15:93-96.
Conrad K.F., J. N. Perry, I. P. Woiwod, C. J. Alexander. 2006. Large-scale temporal changes in spatial pattern during declines of abundance and occupancy in a common moth. J. Insect Conserv. 10:53–64
Corbet, A. S., H. M. Pendlebury. 1978. The Butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Malayan Nature Society
Davey, A. 1998. National System Planning for Protected Areas. Cardiff University, UK and IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 71pp.
David, G. 2005. Effectiveness of Existing Reserves in the Long-Term Protection of a Regionally Rare Butterfly Conservation Biology 19 (5): 1586–1597
Dennis, R. L. H, T. H. Spearks and P. B. Hardy, 1999. Bias in butterfly Distribution maps: the effects of sampling effect. J. of Insect conser. 3:33-42.
Dobson A. P., J. P. Rodriguez, W. M. Roberts and D. S. Wilcove. 1997. Geographic Distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275:550-553.
Ehrlich P. R., D. E. Breedlove, P. F. Brussard and M. A. Sharp. 1972. Weather and the regulation of subalpine populations. Evolution, 53: 243–247.
Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution, 8: 586–608.
Emmel, T. C. and Happner, J. B. 1990. Lepidoptera collecting in Taiwan. Trop. Lepid. 1:43-52.
ESRI 1996. Using ArcView 3.2. ESRI Press.
Fleishman, E., and R. M. Nally. 2002. Topographic Determinants of Faunal Nestedness in Great Basin Butterfly Assemblages: Applications to Conservation Planning Conservation Biology 16 (2): 422–429
Fowles A. P, R. G. Smith 2006 Mapping the habitat quality of patch networks for the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) in Wales. J. Insect Conserv. 10:161–177
Frazer, G. W., R. A. Fournier, J. A. Trofymow, and R. J. Hall. 2001. A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 109: 249–263
Gilbert, L. E. 1980. Food web organization and the conservation of neotropical diversity. In: Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (eds Soule ME, Wilcox BA), pp. 11–34. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Gilbert, L. E. 1984. The biology of butterfly communities. In: The Biology of Butterflies (eds Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR), pp. 41–54. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Goodier, R. and J. N. Jeffers. 1981. Biosphere Reserves. Applied Biology 6:279- 317
Haddad N. 2000. Corridor Length and Patch Colonization by a Butterfly, Junonia coenia. Conservation Biology 14 (3): 738–745.
Hale, S. E. and C. Edwards. 2002. Comparison of film and digital hemispherical photography across a wide range of canopy densities. Agr. and For. Meteo. 112: 51–56.
Hamano E. 1986 Ecological Encyclopedia of Taiwan Butterflies. Kodansha Ltd. (in Japanese)
Hanski, I. 2005. The Shrinking World: Ecological Consequences of Habitat Loss. International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany,. 307 pp.
Hardy, P. B., and R. L. H. Dennis. 2008. Shifting butterfly habitats and biotope affiliations accompany use of alien nectar sources after deforestation. Acta zoologica Sinica 54(1):77-83.
Hortal, J., P. Garcia-Pereira, and E. García-Barros. 2004. Butterfly species richness in mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns. Ecography 27 (1): 68–82
Hough, J. L. and M. N. Shpera. 1989. Bottom up vs. basic needs: integrating conservation and development in the Annapurna and Michiru mountain conservation area of Nepal and Malawi Ambop 18:434-441.
Huntzinger, M. 2003. Effects of fire management practices on butterfly diversity in the forested western United States. Biological Conservation 113:1-12.
IUCN. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity
IUCN. 1994. Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
Jones, P. G., S. E. Beebe. and J. Tohme. 1997. The use of geographical information systems in biodiversity exploration and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 6:947–958.
Kadlec, T., J. Benes, V. Jarosik and M. Konvicka. 2008. Revisiting urban refuges: changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landscape and Urban Planning 85:1-11.
Kitahara, M. and K. Sei. 2001. A comparison of the diversity and structure of butterfly communities in semi-natural and human-modified grassland habitats at the foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Biodiversity and Conservation 10(3):331-351.
Kitching, R. L., A. G. Orr, L. Thalib, H. Mitchell, M. S. Hopkins and A. W. Graham 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37: 284–297.
Krebs, C. J. 2004. Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Benjamin Cummings.
Kremen, C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications, 2, 203–217.
Kremen, C., V. Razafimahatratra, R. P. Guillery, J. Rakotomalala, A. Weiss, J. Ratsisompatrarivo. 1999. Designing the Masoala National Park in Madagascar based on biological and socioeconomic data. Cnersvation Biology 13:1055-1068.
Kuussaari, M., J. Heliölä, M. Luoto, and J Pöyry. 2007. Determinants of local species richness of diurnal Lepidoptera in boreal agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and environment 122:366-376.
Kuussaari, M., M, Niemien and I. Hanski. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:791-801.
Lepidopterological Research Expedition to Taiwan (1967) Results of the Lepidopterological Research Expedition to Taiwan (1965): contributions to the biology of Formosan butterflies. Spec. Bull. Lep. Soc. Jap. 3. 1967
Maes, D., and H. V. Dyck. 2001. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders(north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biological Conservation 99:263-276.
Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing
Marshall, A. G. 1981. The butterfly industry in Taiwan. Antenna (London)6:203-204
McGeoch, MA, and S. L.Chown 1997 Impact of urbanization on agall-inhabiting Lepidoptera assemblage: the importance of reserves in urban areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6: 979–993.
McIntire, E. J. B., C. B. Schultz, and E. E. Crone. 2007. Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact. Journal of Applied Ecology 44 (4):725–736
Monastyrskii A. L. and A. L. Devyatkin 2003. Butterflies of Vietnam. Scientific Publishers.
Morris. M. C.1985.Butlerdly trade and conservation in Taiwan , Unpubl. mimeo. report to the Floru and Fauna Preservation Society 7.pp.
Motta P. C. 2002. Butterflies from the UBERLÂNDIA region, central Brazil: species list and biological comments. Braz. J. Biol., 62(1):151–163
Murphy D. D., K. E. Freas., S. B. Weiss. 1990. An environ-ment-metapopulation approach to population viability analysis for a threatened inverterbrate. Conservation Biology 4: 41–51.
Nature Conservancy Council 1989. The Conservation of Butterflies. Peterborogh.
Nelson, M. S.2007. Butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) as potential ecological indicators of riparian quality in the semi-arid western United States. Ecological Indicators 7:469-480.
New T. R. 1997. Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group‘ for biodiversity conservation? J. Insect Conserv. 1:5–12
New T. R. 1997. Butterfly Conservation. Oxford University Press, Australia.
New T. R. and N. M. Collins. 1991. Swallowtail Butterflies: an Action Plan for Their Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
New, T. R. 2001. Butterfly Conservation. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
Ovaskainen, O. 2004. Habitat-specific movement parameters estimated using mark-recapture data and a diffusion model. Ecology 85:242-257.
Parson M. J. 1999. The Butterflies of Papua New Guinea: Their Systematic and Biology. Academic Press.
Parsons, M. J. 1992. The butterfly farming and trading industry in the Indo-Australia region and its role in tropical forest conservation. Tropical Lepidoptera 3 (Suppl. 1):1-31.
Pereira, J. M. C. and R. M. Itami. 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: A study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel. PE & RS 57(11): 1475-1486.
Phillips, A. 2002. Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas—Protected
Phillips, A. 2003. Turning Ideas on Their Head: The New Paradigm of Protected Areas. The George Wright Forum 20, no. 2.
Pollard, E. and T. J. Yates. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Pp274. Chapman & Hall.
Pulling, A. S. 2002. Conservation Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Pyle R. M (1981) Butterflies: now you see them … International Wildlife (Washington) 11:4-12.
Results of the Lepidopterological Research Expedition to Taiwan. 1965. Contributions to the Biology of Formosan Butterflies, Spec. Bull. Lep. Soc. Jap.3.1967.
Rich, P. M. 1990. Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. Remote Sens. Rev. 5, 13–29.
Roger, L. H. D., T. G. Shreeve, And H. Van Dyke 2006. Habitats and resources; the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers. Conserv. 15:1943–1966
Ruszczyk, A, and A. M. Araujo 1992. Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. Journal of the Lepidopterists Society, 46, 255–264.
Saarinen K., T. Lahti, O. Marttila 2003. Population trends of Finnish butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) in 1991-2000. Biodivers. Conserv. 12:2147–2159
Samways, M. J. 1995. Insect Conservation Biology. Chapman and Hall. UK.
Sands, D. P. A. 2008. Conserving the Richmond Birdwing Butterfly over two decades: Where to next? Ecological Management & Restoration 9(1):4-16
Sands, D. P. A., and T. R. New 2002. The Action Plan for Australian Butterflies. Environemt Australia, Canberra, ACT.
Sands, D. P. A., Scott S. E. and Moffatt R. 1997. The threatened Richmond Birdwing butterfly (Ornithoptera richmondia [Gray]): A community conservation project. Memoirs of the Victorian Museum 56: 449–453.
Schultz, C. B., and E. E. Crone. 1998. Burning Prairie to Restore Butterfly Habitat: A Modeling Approach to Management Tradeoffs for the Fender's Blue. Restoration Ecology 6 (3): 244–252
Schultz, C. B., and E. E. Crone. 2005. Patch Size and Connectivity Thresholds for Butterfly Habitat Restoration Conservation Biology 19 (3): 887–896.
Scott, J. A. 1986. The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press.
Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B. Butterflied and C. Groves. 1993. Gap analysis: A graphical approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monograph 123.
Scriber J. M., and S. H. Gage 1995. Pollution and global climate change: plant ecotones, butterfly hybrid zones and changes in biodiversity. In: Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (eds Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC), pp. 319–344. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville FL.
Severinghaus, S. R. 1977. The butterfly industry and butterfly conservation in Taiwan , Atala(Portland)5:20-24.
Shafer, Craig L. 1999. History of selection and system planning for US natural area national parks and monuments: beauty and biology. Biodiversity & Conservation, 8: 189-204.
Shafer, Craig L. 1999. National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements. Landscape & Urban Planning, 44: 123-153.
Shapiro, A. M. 2002.The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on Alien plants. Diversity and Distribution 8:31-40.
Soberón, J. M., J. M., J. B. Llorente, and L.Oñate. 2000. The use of specimen-label databases for conservation purposes: an example using MEXICAN Papilionid and Pierid butterflies. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:1441-1466。
Stone, R. 1992. Societies sound alarm on biodiversity. Science 257:876.
Stuart, B., P. M. Weiss, D. D. Murphy, W. H. Calvert, and P. R. Ehrlich 1991. Forest Canopy Structure at Overwintering Monarch Butterfly Sites: Measurements with Hemispherical Photography. Conservation Biology 5 (2): 165–175
Theobald, D. M., N. T. Hobbs, T. Bearly, J. A. Zack, T. Shenk and W. E. Riebsame. 2000. Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: Designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology 15: 35-45.
Thomas J. A., M. G. Telfer, D. B. Roy, C.D. Preston, J. J. D. Greenwood, J. R. Asher, R. T. Fox, Clarke, and J. H. Lawton (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881
Thomas, C. D. 1995. Ecological and conservation of butterfly metapopulationns in the fragmented British land scape. In: Ecology and conservation of butterflies. (Ed Pullin A.) Chapman and Hall. Pp.46-63
Unno K. 1974. Taiwan’s butterfly industry. Wildlife (London) 16:356–359
Unno K., and Aoyama J. 1981. Japanese’s Butterflies. Shogakuken
Valtonen, A., K. Saarinen, and J. Jantunen. 2007. Intersection reservations as habitats for meadow butterflies and diurnal moth: Guidelines for planning and management. Landscape and Urban Planning 79:201-209.
van Swaay C. A. M., and M. S. Warren 2006. Prime butterfly areas of Europe; an initial selection of priority sites for conservation. J. Insect Conserv. 10:5–11
Wadsworth R. and J. Treweek. 1999. Geographical information systems for ecology. Addison Wesley Longman, England.
Wahlberg, N., T. Klemetti, and I. Hanski (2002) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25 (2):224–232
Watt W. B, F. S. Chew, L. R. G. Snyder, A. G. Watt, D. E. Rothschild 1968. Population structure of pierid butterflies. I. Num-bers and movements of some montane Colias species. Oecologia Berlin, 27, 1–22.
Weiss S. B. and A. D. Weiss 1998. Landscape-level phenology of a threatened butterfly: A GIS-based modeling approach. Ecosystems 1: 299–309.
Weiss S. B., D. D. Murphy, and R. R. White 1988. Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology, 69, 1486–1496
Weiss S. B., R. R. White, D. D. Murphy, P. R. Ehrlich 1987. Growth and dispersal of larvae of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oikos, 50, 161–166.
Wenzel, M., T. Schmitt, M. Weitzel, and A. Seitz. 2006. The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: Aconservation problem. Biological Conservation 128:542-552.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40527-
dc.description.abstract南山溪流域是台灣重要的蝴蝶多樣性熱點區域,惟近年來受到人為開發及天然災變的影響,目前蝴蝶的種類與數量銳減。本研究使用地理資訊系統,結合蝶類的環境需求,規劃南山溪流域蝴蝶保護區。研究期間1999年2003年,紀錄南山溪流域之蝴蝶11科120種,寄主植物共32科84種,蜜源植物則有16科26種。本研究分析南山溪流域的人為干擾、蜜源植物、寄主植物、坡度、坡向等地形因子對蝶相之影響。結果顯示在南山溪流域地區,向南坡及坡度在20-40度之間的環境,蝴蝶種類與數量較多。蝴蝶在種類與數量上皆與鬱閉度、高度、距住宅區距離呈正相關(p<0.01);而與路面的寬度有負相關(p<0.01);蝴蝶種類與數量與蜜源植物及寄主植物的種類數量上並沒有顯著相關性。
根據上述因子,及應用地理資訊系統的疊圖、空間分析,依據蝴蝶的環境需求,建議南山溪流域中,重要的蝴蝶棲息地位置,應對這些重要的蝴蝶棲息區域進行保護措施。為使蝴蝶資源的保育能永續經營,本研究另建議在南山溪流域以核心區、緩衝區及過渡區,使得蝴蝶的保育工作能在地方落實,其中過渡區可供當地居民加以利用蝴蝶資源,希望未來能結合生態旅遊,使當地住民瞭解保護蝴蝶能帶來地方的繁榮。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe Nan-San-hsi Watershed is one of the most important area of the butterfly diversity hotspots zone in Taiwan. However it has recently been affected by the artifical exploitations and natural disasters, and the number of butterfly species and quantities were obviously decreased. During the investigation, 132 species of butterflies in 11 families, 84 host-plants species in 32 families, and 26 nectar-palnts in 16 families were reco during the investigation. We used Regression to investigate the diversity and abundance of butterflies in relation to canopy coverings, elevations, distances to the river area, distances to the rural area, abundance of their nectar-plants, host-plants and aspects and slope of lands. The results showed that the butterflies preferred to inhabit the south-facing aspects and the slopes at 20-40°. The species and abundance were correlated significantly, positively with canopy coverings, elevations, distances to the rural area. There was no significant correlation between the diversity and abundance of the butterflies and distances to the river and the abundance of their nectar-plants and host-plants. The buffering and overlay in geographic information system (GIS) were taken to design butterfly reserve. We analysis how the artificial disturbances, nectar source plants, host plants, aspects, and slopes affect butterfly community at the Nan-San-Hsi Watershed.The results suggest butterflies prefer to south-facing aspects and slopes at 20-40 degrees. The species richness and total number of butterflies were positively correlated with canopy coverings, elevations, and distances to rural area (p<0.01), negatively correlated with road width (p<0.01) ; and have no relationship with nectar-plants and host-plants. According to the result, we used GIS to design a butterfly conservation plan for the Nan-San-hsi Watershed. We suggest three zones: recreation, buffer, and protecting zones. In the future, we hope to encourge local people by increasing their income from protecting butterflies for butterfly conservation combining the ecological tour.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T16:50:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-D88632005-1.pdf: 3878593 bytes, checksum: 131a0ffc372c01fbdcb138ec72f6b1e2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝誌………………………………………………………………………………..i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………ii
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………iii
第一章 緒言 1
第二章 研究地點、材料與方法 7
2.1 研究地點描述 7
2.2 調查方法 11
第三章 結果 15
3.1 南山溪的蝴蝶種類與數量 15
3.2 南山溪的寄主植物 25
3.3 南山溪的蜜源植物 37
3.4 蝴蝶種類、數量與環境變數的關係 45
第四章 討論 51
4.1 南山溪流域蝴蝶相組成 51
4.2 南山溪流域蝴蝶種類與生物因子的關係 57
4.3 南山溪流域蝴蝶與人為干擾因子的關係 65
4.4 南山溪流域蝴蝶與地貌因子的關係 75
4.5 南山溪流域蝴蝶保護區的規劃 83
4.6 南山溪流域蝴蝶保護區的保育策略 87
第五章 結論 93
引用文獻 95
附錄 107
附錄1. 本研究期間所發現的南山溪蝴蝶名錄 107
附錄2. 南山溪寄主植物 113
附錄3. 南山溪蜜源植物 119
附錄4. 南山溪流域及其鄰近地區蝴蝶名錄 121

圖目錄
圖 1. 本研究地點─南山溪流域位置。 9
圖 2. 南山溪流域地形圖。 9
圖 3. 南山溪流域坡度圖。 10
圖 4. 南山溪流域坡向圖。 10
圖 5 南山溪調查路線圖。 12
圖 6. 南山溪流域蝴蝶各科蝶種數在樣站的分布情形。 17
圖 7. 南山溪流域調查樣站各科蝴蝶數量分布情形。 18
圖 8. 南山溪流域個調查樣站寄主植物在各樣站的分布。 27
圖 9 南山溪流域各樣站影像作為鬱閉度估算(以魚眼鏡頭拍攝)。 44
圖 10 蝴蝶種數與鬱閉度(a)、高度(b)、河川距離(c)、住宅距離(d)、蜜源植物種數(e)、寄主植物種數(f)的迴歸關係。 47
圖 11 蝴蝶隻數與鬱閉度(a)、高度(b)、河川距離(c)、住宅距離(d)、蜜源植物種數(e)、寄主植物種數(f)的迴歸關係。 48
圖 12 蝴蝶種數與坡向(a)和坡度(b)關係。 49
圖 13 蝴蝶隻數與坡度(a)和坡向(b)關係圖。 50
圖 14 南山溪流域1979、1989及1998三個時期的地景變化 55
圖 15 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與寄主植物的迴歸關係。 59
圖 16 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與寄主植物的迴歸關係。 60
圖 17 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與蜜源植物的迴歸關係。 61
圖 18 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與蜜源植物的迴歸關係。 62
圖 19 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與海拔高度的迴歸關係。 66
圖 20 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與海拔高度的迴歸關係。 67
圖 21 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與鬱閉度的迴歸關係。 69
圖 22 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與鬱閉度的迴歸關係。 70
圖 23 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與住宅距離的迴歸關係。 71
圖 24 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與住宅距離的迴歸關係。 72
圖 25 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與坡度的迴歸關係。 76
圖 26 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與坡度的迴歸關係。 77
圖 27 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與坡向的迴歸關係。 78
圖 28 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與坡向的迴歸關係。 79
圖 29 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶種數與河川距離的迴歸關係。 80
圖 30 南山溪流域各科蝴蝶隻數與河川距離的迴歸關係。 81
圖 31 利用坡度及坡向計算的求出南山溪流域蝴蝶重要性值區塊。 84
圖 32 依據MAB建議,所規劃南山溪流域蝴蝶保護區範圍。 85

表目錄
表 1 世界主要產蝶國家的蝴蝶密度(種類數/每萬平方公里)比較 1
表 2 南山溪流域蝴蝶調查方法及測量因子之定義。 13
表 3 南山溪各樣站之環境因子及蝶種發生狀況表 43
表 4 南山溪流域與南投縣、台灣全島蝶種比較 52
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title南山溪蝴蝶保護區規劃之探討zh_TW
dc.titleA Research on Design for the Nanshanhsi Butterfly Reserveen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee方懷聖,陳建志,徐堉峰,賴進貴
dc.subject.keyword蝴蝶,保護區規劃,南山溪流域,地理資訊系統,經營管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordButterfly,Reserve Design,The Nan-San-Hsi Watershed,Geography Information System,Management,en
dc.relation.page126
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-07-31
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept昆蟲學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:昆蟲學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
3.79 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved