請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40466完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 羅美芳 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Jen Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳怡蓁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T16:48:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-09-11 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-09-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
中文部分 內政部統計處(2001,1月10日)•臺閩地區國民生活狀況調查-中華民國八十九年臺閩地區國民生活狀況調查摘要分析•2003年6月14日取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/W3/stat/Survey/national89.htm 王月伶(2005)•健康概念分析•護理雜誌,52(1),40-43。 王妍惠(2003)•心臟衰竭病患症狀經驗量表之發展及其影響因素探討•未發表的 碩士論文,桃園:長庚大學。 江靜儀、陳美伶、余文彬、黃慈心(2001)•接受放射線治療之腦瘤病患其身心困擾之探討.長庚護理,12(4),271-281。 杜友蘭(2001)•護理理論與實務應用•台北:華杏。 汪素敏、顧乃平、林幸台、魏崢(1998)•心臟移植術後病人症狀困擾、社會支持與自我照顧行為相關之探討•護理研究,6(1),4-18。 何逸遷(1995)•腦腫瘤病理學•桃園:華香園。 李靜雯(2002)•乳癌病患乳房手術後一個月之症狀困擾和情緒狀態之改變及其相 關性•未發表的碩士論文,台北:台北醫學大學。 施文文(2004)•以健康信念模式探究大學院校教師健康狀態之影響因素•未發表 的碩士論文,高雄:中山大學。 施瑤玲(2001)•乳癌術後婦女之症狀困擾、社會支持與希望的相關性•未發表的 碩士論文,高雄:高雄醫學大學。 胡海國(1997)•全國一年中住院精神分裂症患者住院次數與社會功能、家族史分析•當代醫學,24(2),84-89。 高翡勵(2003)•接受胃切除胃癌病人的症狀嚴重度、不確定感與希望狀態之探 討•未發表的碩士論文,台北:台北醫學大學。 唐憶淨(1999)•老年人自覺健康狀態及其影響因素•未發表的碩士論文,台中: 中山醫學大學。 陳美芳、馬鳳歧(2004)•乳癌手術後婦女症狀困擾與因應策略之相關性探討•護理雜誌,51(4),37-44。 陳佩英、郭素青、張惠甄、徐一瑱、林麗玉、楊桂美(2004)•口腔癌術後病患之身心症狀與調適•安寧療護雜誌,9(2),153-164。 陳維昭總校閱(2000)•華杏醫學大辭典•台北:華杏。 張彩秀、黃乾全(2002)•中老年健康促進生活型態與自覺健康狀態之關係•衛生教育學報,17,15-30。 黃守正、郭育良、柯德鑫、鄭雅文(2003)•職場社會心理特質與自覺健康狀態之相關•中華職業醫學雜誌,10(4),235-244。 黃秀蘭(2005)•社區獨居老人自我照顧能力、自覺健康狀況、憂鬱情形與生命意義之探討•未發表的碩士論文,台北:台北護理學院。 黃盈翔(2002)•台南市老年人健康功能狀態及其相關因素之探討•未發表的碩士 論文,台南:成功大學。 黃璉華(1992)•老人生活滿意度相關因素之因徑分析研究•護理雜誌,39(4),37-47。 楊美賞、曾清楷、鍾信心、葉宏軒(1992)•門診慢性疼痛病人日常生活功能及心理社會功能障礙之評估•高雄醫學科學雜誌,8(10),552-561。 鄭素月、賴裕和、張利中、吳齊殷(2002)•探討乳癌病人的症狀困擾、自我效能、社會支持與生活品質之關係•新臺北護理期刊,4(1),9-21。 謝瓊慧(2004)•社區老年婦女的健康狀況、家庭功能及生活品質之相關性探討• 未發表的碩士論文,桃園:長庚大學。 鍾文慎、張新儀、石曜堂、溫啟邦(2003)•國人自覺心理健康:2001年國民健康訪問調查結果•台灣公共衛生雜誌,22(6),465-473。 鍾孟樺(2005)•台灣肝癌患者之症狀群集現象•未發表的碩士論文,台北:台北 醫學大學。 羅惠敏、徐南麗、邱慧洳、廖惠娥、劉欣怡(2004)•癌症病患症狀困擾與不確定感關係之探討•慈濟護理雜誌,3(1),72-80。 羅惠敏、徐南麗、蕭正光、劉雪娥(2003)•比較疼痛及非疼痛癌症病患不確定感、症狀困擾、社會支持與生活品質關係•慈濟護理雜誌,2(3),70-76。 蕭雅竹(2004)•護生靈性健康與實習壓力、憂鬱傾向及自覺健康狀態之相關性研 究•未發表的博士論文,台北:台灣師範大學。 蕭雅君(2003)•口腔癌患者症狀困擾與生活品質之相關性探討•未發表的碩士論 文,台北:陽明醫學大學。 酆淑琴、賴裕和、陳淑卿、張東杰、廖美南、杜素珍(2002)•鼻咽癌病患接受放射治療的症狀困擾及情緒狀態之探討.長庚護理,13(1),21-31。 英文部分 Adams, C. M. T. (2002). The surgery of pituitary tumours. In J. A. H. Wass & S. M. Shalet (Eds.), Oxford textbook of endocrinology (pp. 160-168). Oxford: Oxford University. Agrawal, A., Cincu, R., & Goel, A. (2007). Current concepts and controversies in the management of non-functioning giant pituitary macroadenomas. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 109, 645-650. Baird, A., Sullivan, T., Zafar, S., & Rock, J. (2003). Quality of life in patients with pituitary tumors: A preliminary study. Quality Management in Health Care, 12(2), 97-105. Barnard, K., Frayne, S. M., Skinner, K. M., & Sullivan, L. M. (2003). Health status among women with menstrual symptoms. Journal of Women’s Health, 12(9), 911-919. Bodie, J., Lewis, J., Schow, D., & Monga, M. (2003). Laboratory evaluations of erectile dysfunction: An evidence based approach. The Journal of Urology, 169, 2262-2264. Boehmke, M. M., & Dickerson, S. S. (2005). Symptom, symptom experiences, and symptom distress encountered by women with breast cancer undergoing current treatment modalities. Cancer Nursing, 28(5), 382-389. Borodkin, K., Ayalon, L., Kanety, H., & Dagan, Y. (2005). Dysregulation of circadian rhythms following prolactin-secreting pituitary microadenoma. Chronobiology International, 22(1), 145-156. Buckley, T. M., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2005). On the interactions of the hypothalamic- pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and sleep: Normal HPA axis activity and circadian rhythm, exemplary sleep disorders. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 90(5), 3106-3114. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2003). 實用護理研究:指引、評論及運用(上)(下)(陳桂敏等譯)•台中:滄海。(原著出版於2003) Burt, M. G., & Ho, K. K. Y. (2006). Newer options in the management of acromegaly. Internal Medicine Journal, 36, 437-444. Buvat, J. (2003). Hyperprolactinemia and sexual function in men: A short review. International Journal of Impotence Research, 15, 373-377. Carrim, Z. I., Reeks, G. A., Chohan, A. W., Dunn, L. T., & Hadley, D. M. (2007). Predicting impairment of central vision from dimensions of the optic chiasm in patients with pituitary adenoma. Acta Neurochirurgica, 149, 255-260. Ciric, I. S. (2006). Complications of transsphenoidal microsurgery. In H. H. Schmidek & D. W. Roberts (Eds.), Operative neurosurgical techniques (5th ed., pp. 326-331). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. Corsello, S. M., Ubertini, G., Altomare, M., Lovicu, R. M., Migneco, M. G., Rota, C. A., et al. (2003). Giant prolactinomas in men: Efficacy of cabergoline treatment. Clinical Endocrinology, 58, 662-670. Dekkers, O. M., van der Klaauw, A. A., Pereira, A. M., Biermasz, N. R., Honkoop, P. J., Roelfsema, F., et al. (2006). Quality of life is decreased after treatment for nonfunctional pituitary macroadenoma. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 91(9), 3364-3369. Devin, J. K., & Blevins, L. S. (2006). Endocrinologic approach to the evaluation and management of the patient undergoing surgery for a pituitary tumor. In H. H. Schmidek & D. W. Roberts (Eds.), Operative neurosurgical techniques (5th ed., pp. 300-320). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. Doran, D. M. (2003). Functional status. In D. M. Doran (Ed.), Nursing-sensitive outcomes: State of the science (pp. 27-64). London: Jones and Bartlett. Edelman, C. L., & Mandle, C. L. (2006). Health promotion: Throughout the life span (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. Ell, K. (1996). Social networks, social support and coping with serious illness: The family connection. Social Science and Medicine, 42(2), 173-183. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: Norton. Esposito, V., Santoro, A., Minniti, G., Salvati, M., Innocenzi, G., & Lanzetta, G., et al. (2004). Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for GH-, PRL- and ACTH- secreting pituitary tumours: Outcome analysis in a series of 125 patients. Neurological Science, 25, 251-256. Ezzat, S., Serri, O., Chik, C. L., Johnson, M. D., Beauregard, H., Marcovitz, S., et al. (2006). Canadian consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acromegaly. Clinical Investigative Medicine, 29(1), 29-39. Fylkesnes, K., & Forde, O. H. (1991). The tromso study: Predictors of self-evaluated health – Has society adopted the expanded health concept? Social Science and Medicine, 32(2), 141-146. Gnanalingham, K. K., Bhattacharjee, S., Pennington, R., Ng, J., & Mendoza, J. (2005). The time course of visual field recovery following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: Predictive factors for a good outcome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 76, 415-419. Gur, A., Cevik, R., Sarac, A. J., Colpan, L., & Em, S. (2004). Hypothalamic-pituitary- gonadal axis and cortisol in young women with primary fibromyalgia: The potential roles of depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance in the occurrence of hypocortisolism. Annals of the Rheumatic Disease, 63, 1504-1506. Hinckley, J. J., & Packard, M. E. W. (2001). Family education seminars and social functioning of adults with chronic aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 241-254. Holdaway, I. M. (2007). Excess mortality in acromegaly. Hormone Research, 68(suppl. 5), 166-172. Hunt, S. M., & McEwen, J. (1980). The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociological Health and Illness, 2, 231-246. Hwu, Y. J., Coates, V. E., & Boore, J. R. P. (2001). The evolution of health concept in nursing research: 1988-1999. Patients Education and Counseling, 42, 105-114. Hwu, Y. J., Coates, V. E., Boore, J. R. P., & Bunting, B. P. (2002). The concept of health scale: Developed for Chinese people with chronic illness. Nursing Research, 51(5), 292-301. Idler, E. L., & Kasl, S. (1991). Health perceptions and survival: Do global evaluations of health status really predict mortality? Journal of Gerontology, 46(2), S55-S65. Knight, M .M. (2000). Cognitive ability and functional status. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1459-1468. Lai, S. M., Perera, S., Duncan, P. W., & Bode, R. (2003). Physical and social functioning after stroke. Stroke, 34, 488-493. Levy, A. (2004). Pituitary disease: Presentation, diagnosis, and management. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 75(3), 47-52. Levy, M. J., Matharu, M. S., Meeran, K., Powell, M., & Goadsby, P. J. (2005). The clinical characteristics of headache in patients with pituitary tumours. Brain, 128, 1921-1930. Macbeth, H. M. (1996). Health outcomes: Biological, social, and economic perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford Science. Mary, L.V. (2003). Pituitary tumors. In J. E. Hall & L. K. Nieman (Eds.), Handbook of diagnostic endocrinology (pp. 55-65). Totowa, NJ: Humana. McCorkle, R., & Young, K. (1978). Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nursing, 1, 373-378. McDaniel, R. W., & Rhodes, V. A. (1995). Symptom experience. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 11(4), 232-234. McDaniel, S. H., Campbell, T. L., Hepworth, J., & Lorenz, A. (2005). Family-oriented primary care (2nd ed). New York: Springer. Michael-Webb, K., Laurent, J. J., Laws, E, R., & Jane, J. A. (2005). Surgery for pituitary adenoma. In P. M. Black & J. S. Loeffler (Eds.), Cancer of the nervous system (2nd ed., pp. 427-438). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Morgan, K., & Closs, S. J. (1999). Sleep management in nursing practice: An evidence- based guide. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. Peace, K. A., Orme, S. M., Sebastian, J. P., Thompson, A. R., Barnes, S., Ellist, A., et al. (1997). The effect of treatment variables on mood and social adjustment in adult patients with pituitary disease. Clinical Endocrinology, 46(4), 445-450. Perrin, P. (2003). A patient’s perspective on pituitary yumors. In M. P. Powell, S. L. Lightman, & E. R. Laws (Eds.), Management of pituitary tumors (2nd ed., pp. 287-308). Totowa, NJ: Humana. Post, M., Krol, B., & Groothoff, J. W. (2006). Self-rated health as a predictor of return to work among employees on long-term sickness absence. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(5), 289-297. Powell, M. P., Lightman, S. L., & Laws, E. R. (2003). Management of pituitary tumors: The clinician’s practical guide (2nd ed.). Totowa, NJ: Humana. Rahkonen, O., Laaksonen, M., Martikainen, P., Roos, E., & Lahelma, E. (2006). Job control, job demands, or social class? The impact of working conditions on the relation between social class and health. Journal of Epidemiology, Community and Health, 60(5), 50-54. Rhodes, V., & Watson, P. M. (1987). Symptom distress – the concept: Past and present. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 3(4), 242-247. Robinson, R. L., & Swindle, R. W. (2000). Premenstrual symptom severity: Impact on social functioning and treatment –seeking behaviors. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-based Medicine, 9(7), 757-768. Saussez, S., Mahillon, V., Chantrain, G., Thill, M. P., & Lequeux, T. (2007). Acromegaly presented as a cause of laryngeal dyspnea. Auris Nasus Larynx, 34, 541-543. Sidani, S. (2003). Symptom management. In D. M. Doran (Ed.), Nursing-sensitive outcomes: State of the science (pp. 115-175). London: Jones and Bartlett. Smith, J. A. (1991). The idea of health: A philosophical inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 3, 43-50. Tishelman, C., Taube, A., & Saches, L. (1991). Self related symptom distress in cancer patients: Reflections of disease, illness or sickness? Social Science and Medicine, 33(11), 1229-1240. Trepp, R., Evertst, R., Stettler, C., Fischli, S., Allemann, S., Webb, S. M., et al. (2005). Assessment of quality of life in patients with uncontrolled vs. controlled acromegaly using the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL). Clinical Endocrinology, 63, 103-110. Visot, A., Pencalet, P., Boulin, A., & Gaillard, S. (2006). Surgical management of endocrinologically silent pituitary tumors. In H. H. Schmidek & D. W. Roberts (Eds.), Operative neurosurgical techniques (5th ed., pp. 355-373). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. Ware, J. E., Brook, R. H., Davies, A. R., & Lohr, K. N. (1981). Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. American Journal of Public Health, 71(6), 620-625. Wilson, C. B. (1984). A decade of pituitary microsurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery, 61, 814-833。 World Health Organization (WHO) (1981, December 1). The definition of health. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from http://www.who.int/en/ Yager, J. A., & Ehmann, T. S. (2006). Untangling social function and social cognition: A review of concepts and measurement. Psychiatry, 69(1), 47-70. Yang, A. V. (2006). Focus on brain cancer research. New York: Nova. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40466 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 腦下垂體腫瘤病患在神經外科手術中屬於第三大族群,主要治療方式為手術摘除,雖然手術能成功地移除腦下垂體腫瘤,但因腦下垂體腫瘤所呈現的症狀非常多樣化,並非手術後皆可改善,包含生理(如,視力模糊、肢端肥大等)與心理(如,憂鬱、焦慮等)的症狀,這些症狀會對病患的生活與工作等方面造成不同程度困擾,且病患術後大多表示不滿意他們的生活,這與我們臨床照護時所見到腦
下垂體腫瘤病患於術後在外觀上即與一般健康人無異之情況有所出入,故引發本研究之目的在於了解腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之症狀困擾與健康狀態。 本研究採立意取樣,以台北市某醫學中心於民國93年1月至96年4月期間,曾因腦下垂體腫瘤住院接受過手術之90名病患為研究對象,以問卷調查及病歷查閱方式收集資料。研究結果發現,術前最多研究對象經歷且嚴重度最高的症狀為『視力模糊』,而目前研究對象最常見的症狀為『容易感覺疲倦』,嚴重程度最高的症狀為男性個案之『勃起不能』;術後整體症狀困擾改善率約五成,『目前症狀困擾總數』顯著較『術前症狀困擾總數』多(t = 3.54,p = 0.001),但手術前後症狀困擾嚴重程度間並無差異(t = 0.35,p = 0.727)。個別症狀困擾改善率時間趨勢不同可分為四組,術後一個月內有最明顯改善率(如,視力模糊、頭痛等);術後半年內(不包括一個月內)有最明顯改善率(如,性慾減低、四肢粗大等);術後至術後一年以上有漸增加之改善率(如,不想參與社交);術後至術後一年以上之改善率皆不明顯(如,睡不好、容易疲倦等),其中以睡不好為改善率最低之症狀困擾項目。研究對象之自覺健康狀態多介於『尚可』與『好』之間,最高分之項目為『比較現在和術後出院時的健康狀況』,最低分之項目為『比較同年齡的人近一年健康狀況』,最受影響之社會功能為『工作』,最不受影響的為『家庭生活』;差異分析結果發現,(1)研究對象之人格特質為樂觀者,其目前症狀困擾總數愈少、目前症狀困擾總分愈低、自覺健康狀態與社會功能狀態皆顯著愈佳,(2)家人支持愈足夠者,其目前症狀困擾總分愈低、自覺健康狀態與社會功能狀態愈佳,(3)對於所接受之護理指導覺得足夠者,其目前症狀困擾總數愈少、目前症狀困擾總分愈低、社會功能狀態愈佳;相關分析結果發現,『自覺健康狀態』與『目前症狀困擾』(r = -0.47,p = 0.000)、『目前症狀困擾嚴重程度』(r = -0.52,p = 0.000)有顯著負相關,『社會功能狀態』與『目前症狀困擾』(r = -0.61,p = 0.000)、『目前症狀困擾嚴重程度』(r = -0.70,p = 0.000)有顯著負相關,而『自覺健康狀態』與『社會功能狀態』(r = 0.46,p = 0.000)間亦有顯著正相關,『目前症狀困擾』與『目前症狀困擾嚴重程度』(r = 0.91,p = 0.000)間有顯著正相關。研究對象自覺健康狀態之預測因子為目前症狀困擾總分(β = -0.35)、家人支持情況(β = 0.28)、人格特質(β = 0.21),其解釋變異量為35.7 %;社會功能狀態之預測因子為目前症狀困擾總分(β = -0.70),解釋變異量為48.9 %。 藉由本研究的發現,症狀困擾的數量與程度皆會影響個案之健康狀態,症狀困擾中包括多數個案感到困擾的視力障礙、疲倦、睡不好之問題,與困擾程度高的性功能障礙,對於中年個案在此人生階段中需達到的發展目標-有成就感的工作與美滿的性生活上有所衝擊,故與同年齡人的健康狀態比較顯示健康較不好,但藉由正向因子:增加家人支持、讓個案持有較樂觀之看法與態度、提供充足的護理指導等,皆有利於個案對手術後症狀的管理與整體健康狀態的提昇。期望將本研究結果運用在臨床護理實務上,讓病患獲得更多的資訊,使出院後的生活能有更多準備與更佳調適,也提供臨床醫療照護有更多的依據,提供更切合病患之照護。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Patients with pituitary tumor are the third group in neurosurgical operation. Tumor excision is the major therapeutics for these patients. Surgery can remove tumor successfully; however, leaves in diverse symptoms after surgery. These include physiological (for example, blurred vision and acromegaly) and psychological (for example, depression and anxiety) symptoms that will result in different levels of stress to patients’ lives and works. Most patients don’t satisfy with their lives after surgery, and the phenomena conflicts with what we observe during clinical nursing: patients look as healthy people after surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the symptom distress and health status of pituitary tumor patients after surgery.
By purposive sampling, the data from 90 patients experienced pituitary tumor operation from one medical center in Taipei city during January 2004 to April 2007 were gathered by questionnaire survey and medical records review. The study result shows that the most patients experienced and most serious symptom is “blurred vision” before surgery, whereas, presently the most common symptom is “fatigue” , and the most serious symptom is “impotence” among male patients. The total symptom improvement rate after surgery is about 50%. The total number of present symptom is significantly higher than the total number of symptom before surgery (t=3.54, p=0.001). However, there is no significant difference between the levels of symptom distress before and after surgery (t=0.35, p=0.727). Each symptom had different improvement rate, which can be divided into four groups according to different time trend: most obvious improved within one month (for example, blurred vision and headache), most obvious improved within half year (excluding one month) (for example, decrease in libido and acromegaly), steady increasing improved within one year (for example, social isolation) and have no obvious improved over one year after surgery (for example, sleep problems and fatigue). Fatigue has lowest improvement rate among these symptoms. The self-rated health statuses of patients are usually between “fair” and “good”. The highest score one is “compare the health status now and just after surgery”, whereas the lowest one is “compare with the health status of same age people.” The most affected social function is “work” and the less affected one is “family life.” Difference analysis result shows that (1) patients who have optimistic personality have fewer total number of present symptom, lower level of present symptom distress and better self-rated health status and social function, (2) the more the support from family, the lower level of present symptom distress and the better self-rated health status and social function, (3) patients who received enough nursing education have lower level of present symptom distress and better self-rated health status and social function. Correlation analysis shows that there are significant negative correlations between “self-rated health status” and “the total number of present symptom” (r=-0.47, p=0.000), between “self-rated health status” and “level of present symptom distress” (r=-0.52, p=0.000), between “social function” and “the total number of present symptom” (r=-0.61, p=0.000), and between “social function” and “the level of present symptom distress” (r=-0.70, p=0.000). There are significant positive correlations between “self-rated health status” and “social function” (r=0.46, p=0.000), and between “the total number of present symptom” and “level of present symptom distress” (r=0.91, p=0.000). The predictors of patients’ self-rated health status are the total number of present symptom (β=-0.35), family support (β=0.28), and personality (β=0.21). A total of 35.7% of the variance was explained. The predictor of social function is the total number of present symptom (β=-0.70). A total of 48.9% of the variance was explained. From the results of this study, the total number of present symptom and level of symptom distress both affect patients’ health status. Most common symptoms, such as blurred vision, fatigue, sleep problems, and high stressful symptoms, such as sexual dysfunction both impact on the developmental tasks of middle-age patients-work with sense of accomplish and satisfying sexual life. Therefore, patients have worse health status comparing with same age people. However, positive factors, including more family support, optimistic views and ample nursing education, will benefit patients’ self-management of symptom after surgery and promote their health status. We hope the result of this study can be applied on clinical nursing practice, thus patients can have more information that can prepare them more and make them better adapt to the symptom distress after discharged from hospital. The results also provide reference to clinical nursing so that patients can receive more suitable care. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T16:48:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R91426034-1.pdf: 776676 bytes, checksum: c2fdd0c2658b958174f5f55d751a87e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 vii 圖目次 ix 表目次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與重要性 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 名詞定義 4 第四節 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻查證 6 第一節 腦下垂體腫瘤 6 第二節 症狀困擾及相關因素 11 第三節 健康狀態及相關因素 15 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究設計 21 第二節 研究工具 22 第三節 資料收集過程 24 第四節 資料分析 25 第五節 倫理考量 26 第四章 研究結果 27 第一節 研究對象人口學特性與疾病特性 27 第二節 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之症狀困擾 41 第三節 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之健康狀態 51 第四節 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患其人口學特性、疾病特性與其症狀 困擾和健康狀態之差異及相關分析 53 第五節 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患健康狀態之預測因子 59 第五章 討論 61 第一節 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之症狀困擾及改善情形 61 第二節 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之症狀困擾及健康狀態 65 第六章 結論與建議 70 第一節 結論 70 第二節 建議 71 第三節 研究限制 73 參考文獻 75 中文部分 75 英文部分 77 附錄 82 附錄一 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之基本資料表 82 附錄二 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之疾病相關資料表 84 附錄三 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之症狀困擾量表 87 附錄四 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之健康狀態量表 90 附錄五 專家效度名單 92 附錄六 自覺健康狀況量表使用同意書 94 附錄七 倫理委員會審查通過函 96 圖目次 圖 2 1 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患症狀困擾與健康狀態概念架構 5 圖 4-1.1 hGH抽血數值正常率變化情形 38 圖 4-1.2 Prolactin抽血數值正常率變化情形 38 圖 4-1.3 ACTH抽血數值正常率變化情形 38 圖 4-1.4 Cortisol DL抽血數值正常率變化情形 38 圖 4-1.5 hsTSH (CIA)抽血數值正常率變化情形 39 圖 4-1.6 Free T4 (CIA)抽血數值正常率變化情形 39 圖 4-1.7 T3 (RIA)抽血數值正常率變化情形 39 圖 4-1.8 T4 (RIA)抽血數值正常率變化情形 39 圖 4-1.9 Testosterone抽血數值正常率變化情形 40 圖 4-1.10 FSH抽血數值正常率變化情形 40 圖 4-1.11 LH抽血數值正常率變化情形 40 圖 4-2.1 視力模糊之改善情形 46 圖 4-2.2 頭痛之改善情形 46 圖 4-2.3 感覺憂鬱之改善情形 46 圖 4-2.4 乳漏(女)之改善情形 46 圖 4-2.5 停經(女)之改善情形 47 圖 4-2.6 情緒不穩之改善情形 47 圖 4-2.7 鼻塞之改善情形 47 圖 4-2.8 頭暈之改善情形 47 圖 4-2.9 易流鼻血之改善情形 48 圖 4-2.10 性慾減低之改善情形 48 圖 4-2.11 四肢粗大之改善情形 48 圖 4-2.12 勃起不能(男)之改善情形 48 圖 4-2.13 口乾舌燥之改善情形 49 圖 4-2.14 不想社交之改善情形 49 圖 4-2.15 睡不好之改善情形 49 圖 4-2.16 容易焦慮之改善情形 49 圖 4-2.17 容易疲倦之改善情形 50 圖 4-2.18 體重增加之改善情形 50 表目次 表 2 1 腦下垂體荷爾蒙分泌不足之症狀與病徵 9 表 2 2 腦下垂體荷爾蒙分泌過多之症狀與病徵 9 表 2 3 症狀困擾之相關文獻 13 表 2 4 健康狀態之相關文獻 20 表 4 1.1 研究對象人口學特性 28 表 4 1.2 研究對象疾病特性 32 表 4 1.3 腦下垂體腫瘤特性 33 表 4 1.4 研究對象術後狀況 34 表 4 1.5 住院期間曾接受之護理指導 35 表 4 1.6 研究對象之荷爾蒙檢驗結果 37 表 4 2.1 研究對象之症狀困擾與嚴重程度 42 表 4 2.2 術前與目前症狀困擾總數及嚴重程度總分之比較 43 表 4 2.3 最困擾之症狀 43 表 4 2.4 術後症狀困擾改善情形 45 表 4 3.1 自覺健康狀態量表得分情形 52 表 4 3.2 社會功能狀態量表得分情形 52 表 4 4.1 研究對象目前症狀困擾與健康狀態之相關 54 表 4 4.2 人口學及疾病特性與目前症狀困擾及健康狀態之相關 54 表 4 4.3 人口學特性與目前症狀困擾及健康狀態之差異性分析 56 表 4 4.4 疾病特性與目前症狀困擾及健康狀態之差異性分析 58 表 4 5.1 預測研究對象健康狀態之多元逐步迴歸分析 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 腦下垂體腫瘤手術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 腦下垂體腫瘤 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自覺健康狀態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 症狀困擾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會功能狀態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | self-rated health status | en |
| dc.subject | symptom distress | en |
| dc.subject | pituitary tumor surgery | en |
| dc.subject | pituitary tumor | en |
| dc.subject | social function | en |
| dc.title | 腦下垂體腫瘤術後病患之症狀困擾與健康狀態之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Symptom Distress and Health Status for Post-Surgical Patients with Pituitary Tumor | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 范君瑜,曾勝弘 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 腦下垂體腫瘤,腦下垂體腫瘤手術,症狀困擾,自覺健康狀態,社會功能狀態, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | pituitary tumor,pituitary tumor surgery,symptom distress,self-rated health status,social function, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 97 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 護理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 護理學系所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 758.47 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
