請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40254完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姚開屏(Kai-Ping Yao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jhih-Jyun Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊智鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T16:43:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 姚開屏（2002）。健康相關生活品質概念與量測原理之簡介。台灣醫學，6(2)，183-192。
姚懿、李小平（2007）。時間序列分析方法在心理學中的應用。徐州師範大學學報，33(5)，111-114。 葉小蓁，（2006）。時間序列分析與應用。臺北市：臺大法律學院圖書文具部總經銷。 Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(2), 139-150. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139 Allen, B. P., & Potkay, C. R. (1981). On the arbitrary distinction between states and traits. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 41(5), 916-928. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality : A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company. Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1-171. Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Lu. L. (1995). Testing for stress and happiness: The role of social and cognitive factors. Stress and Emotion, 15, 173-187. Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society Series, A(160), 268–282. Bartlett, M. S. (1946). On the Theoretical Specification and Sampling Properties of Autocorrelated Time-Series. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 8(1), 27-41. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time series analysis : Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis : Forecasting and control 2nd edn. San Francisco: Holden-Day. Burke, P. A. K., Robert E.; Dworkin, Robert H. . (1984). Traits, consistency, and self-schemata: What do our methods measure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 568-579. Butler, A. C., Hokason, J. E., & Flynn, H. A. (1994). A comparison of self-esteem liability and low trait self-esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 166-177. Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. [Harmondsworth, Mddx.]: Penguin Books. Cattell, R. B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Cattell, R. B. (1979). The structure of personality in its environment. Springer Pub. Co.: New York. Chaplin, W. F., John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1988). Conceptions of States and Traits: Dimensional Attributes With Ideals as Prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 541-557. Clark, A. E. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1139. Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Arenberg, D. (1980). Enduring dispositions in adult males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 793-800. Cummins, R. A. (2000a). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55-72. Cummins, R. A. (2000b). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 133. Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 225-256. de Boer, A. G., van Lanschot, J. J., Stalmeier, P. F., van Sandick, J. W., Hulscher, J. B., de Haes, J. C., & Sprangers, M. A. (2004). Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res, 13(2), 311-320. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. Diener, E. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the Frequency, Not the Intensity, of Positive Versus Negative Affect. 39. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4 Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1977). Block and psychoticism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(6), 651-652. doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.86.6.651 Eysenck, H. J. a. E., S.B.G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London: Hodder & Stoughton. Eysenck, M. W. (1980). Mischel and the concept of personality. British Journal of Psychology, 71(2), 191. Eysenck, M. W. (1997). Anxiety and cognition : A unified theory. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press. Friedman, M. (1939). A Correction: The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34(205), 109. Fridhandler, B. M. (1986). Conceptual Note on State, Trait, and the State-Trait Distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 169-174. doi: Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.169 Gower, J. C. (1967). A Comparison of Some Methods of Cluster Analysis. Biometrics, 23, 623- 637. Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., McNamara, C. W., Waschull, S. B., Berry, A. J., Herlocker, C. E., & Abend, T. A. (1999). Individual Differences in Reactivity to Daily Events: Examining the Roles of Stability and Level of Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 185-208. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, Life Events, and Subjective Well-Being: Toward a Dynamic Equilibrium Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731-739. Hertzog, C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1987). Beyond Autoregressive Models: Some Implications of the Trait-State Distinction for the Structural Modeling of Developmental Change. Child Development, 58(1), 93-109. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (1998). Positive moods derived from leisure and their relation to happiness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 523-535. Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical Clustering Schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241-254. King, B. (1967). Step-wise Clustering Procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 86-101. Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. New York: Routledge. Lance, G. N. a. W. T. W. (1967a). A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies. I. Hierarchical Systems. The Computer Journal, 9, 373-380. Leary, M. R. (1990). Response to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 221-229. Lorr, M., & Strack, S. (1993). Some NEO-PI Five-Factor Personality Profiles. [Article]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60(1), 91. Lu, L. (1999). Personal or environmental causes of happiness: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(1), 79. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1(I), 231-297. McCrae, R. R. (1994). The stability of personality: Observations and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(6), 173. Mortimer, J. T., Finch, M. D., & Kumka, D. (1982). Persistence and change in development: The multidimensional self-concept. Life Span Development and Behavior, 4, 263-313. Nettle, D. (2005). Happiness : The science behind your smile. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Nezlek, J. B., & Plesko, R. M. (2001). Day-to-day relationships among self-concept clarity, self-esteem, daily events, and mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 201-211. Ninot, #160, Gr, #233, gory, FORTES, . . . Didier. (2001). A psychometric tool for the assessment of the dynamics of the physical self (Vol. 51). Paris, FRANCE: Centre de psychologie appliquee. Ninot, G. (2005). The dynamics of self-esteem in adults over a 6-month period: An exploratory study. Journal of Psychology, 139(4), 315. Ninot, G., & Fortes, M. (2007). Studying the dynamics of psychosociological constructs. Etudier la Dynamique de Construits en Psychologie Sociale, 60(1), 11-42. doi: 10.3917/sm.060.0011 Ninot, G., Fortes, M., Delignieres, D., & Maiano, C. (2004). The dynamic adjustment of physical self in adults. Individual Differences Research, 2(2), 137-151. Norman, W. T. (1967). 2800 Personality trait descriptors--normative operating characteristics for a university population. Quenouille, M. H. (1949). Approximate Tests of Correlation in Time-Series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 11(1), 68-84. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. Rubin, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(1), 40. Shaffer, J. W., Graves, P. L., Swank, R. T., & Pearson, T. A. (1987). Clustering of personality traits in youth and the subsequent development of cancer among physicians. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10(5), 441-447. Slutzky, E. (1937). The Summation of Random Causes as the Source of Cyclic Processes. Econometrica, 5(2), 105-146. Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy; the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. Steyer, R. F., Dieter; Schmitt, Manfred J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8(2), 79-98. Stones, M. J., Hadjistavropoulos, T., Tuuko, H., & Kozma, A. (1995). Happiness has traitlike and statelike properties: A reply to Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research, 36(2), 129-144. doi: 10.1007/bf01079722 Strelau, J. (2001). The concept and status of trait in research on temperament. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 311-325. doi: 10.1002/per.412 Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and Subjective Well-Being: Only Recent Events Matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1091-1102. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1998). Dynamical Social Psychology: Guilford Press. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 1-34. doi: 10.1007/bf00292648 Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? - Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32(2), 101-160. doi: 10.1007/bf01078732 Veenhoven, R. (1998). Two state-trait discussions on happiness: A Reply to Stones et al. Social Indicators Research, 43(3), 211-225. Walker, G. (1931). On Periodicity in Series of Related Terms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 131(818), 518-532. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244. Wold, H. (1938). A study in the analysis of stationary time-series. Uppsala, Sweden: Almquist & Wiksell. Yule, G. U. (1927). On a method of investigating periodicities in distributed series, with special reference to Wofer's sunspot numbers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A(226), 267-298. Ziller, R. C., Hagey, J., Smith, M., & Long, B. H. (1969). Self-esteem: A self-social construct. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(1), 84-95. doi: 10.1037/h0027374 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40254 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去心理學研究，經常以大樣本、橫斷式的方式蒐集資料。並以整合、平均觀點進行分析。其背後假設資料的平均反應對於樣本及母群具有代表性；更進一步假設人與人之間的心理機制及反應具有某種程度一致性。限制便是不易研究個體心理量之間的獨特表徵，更忽略時間（time）的影響力。本研究使用時間序列資料及分析方法，探討過去研究中經常各執一詞的主題─心理量的特質與狀態假說。並以生活品質、快樂、自尊，三種心理量為例。試圖從個體、縱貫式、非整合的觀點對三種心理量的特質、狀態表徵進行討論。研究一使用10位大學生樣本，結果普遍支持狀態說但不拒絕特質表徵。而且個體間有迥異的差別，尤其以標準差、平均數最具有個體內的一致性及個體間的差異性。研究二進一步以群聚分析（clustering analysis）證實，此類個體內的一致性及個體間的差異性可能是心理量在特質、狀態假說間進行分辨時不可或缺的重要資訊。過去文獻認為心理量可能隨著年齡的增長而趨於穩定，故研究三進一步蒐集壯年樣本，結果過半的受試者確實產生特質說的時間相依性質。無論哪一群樣本，結論支持心理量可以同時具有〝特質─狀態〞的二元表徵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Mainstream of psychological researches usually utilizes large samples, cross-sectional studies and aggregate frames to analyze data and interpret them. This kind of viewpoint assumes that there exists consistency among individual responses and inner psychological mechanism. The limitations are that the specific features of individuals are not easy to be revealed and the time effect has been ignored. Instead of traditional viewpoint, this study explores the trait-like and state-like properties of global self-esteem, happiness and the quality of life by using time series data and analysis. The topic of trait-like or state-like distinction has stayed controversy among different studies for a long time. By using time series analysis, a more objective method, this study utilizes individual, longitudinal study and non-aggregate frame to depict the properties of psychological measures. In study 1, author examined the property of time dependency within self-esteem, happiness and quality of life with 10 college students involved. The results generally support the state-like property among psychological measures. And there are different responses among subjects, especially in means and standard deviations. In study 2, by using clustering analysis, author further confirmed that interpersonal differences and intrapersonal consistency might be important information in distinguishing trait and state. Since some literatures suggest that the stability of psychological measures may be more stable as age increasing. Study 3 collected older subjects and examined age effect. Over half of subjects showed time dependency among self-esteem, happiness and quality of life. In conclusion, the results support that self-esteem, happiness and quality of life could contain both trait-like and state-like properties. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T16:43:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98227112-1.pdf: 4078415 bytes, checksum: 272cd0106219da2f749eff0e55ac3cc5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言與文獻探討…………………………………………………………1
第一節 前言……………………………………………………………………1 第二節 特質與狀態……………………………………………………………3 第三節 自尊、快樂與生活品質的狀態特質說………………………………10 第四節 時間序列方法…………………………………………………………15 第五節 研究目的與假設………………………………………………………22 第二章 研究一……………………………………………………………………25 第一節 研究目的………………………………………………………………25 第二節 研究方法………………………………………………………………25 第三節 研究結果………………………………………………………………30 第四節 討論與結論……………………………………………………………48 第三章 研究二……………………………………………………………………51 第一節 研究目的………………………………………………………………51 第二節 研究方法………………………………………………………………51 第三節 研究結果………………………………………………………………53 第四節 討論與結論……………………………………………………………57 第四章 研究三……………………………………………………………………59 第一節 研究目的………………………………………………………………59 第二節 研究方法………………………………………………………………59 第三節 研究結果………………………………………………………………60 第四節 討論與結論……………………………………………………………66 第五章 總結………………………………………………………………………69 參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………73 附錄一 研究問卷 ………………………………………………………………81 附錄二 1號、6號、7號、11號及12號的ACF整理表…………………… 88 附錄三 1號、6號、7號、11號及12號的PACF整理表 ………………… 98 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 自尊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 時間序列 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 狀態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生活品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 快樂 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | quality of life | en |
| dc.subject | global self-esteem | en |
| dc.subject | happiness | en |
| dc.subject | time series | en |
| dc.subject | trait | en |
| dc.subject | state | en |
| dc.title | 是特質？還是狀態？─以時間序列資料來探討自尊、快樂及生活品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Trait or State: An Exploration of Self-esteem, Happiness and Quality of Life by Time Series | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉光輝,葉小蓁 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 時間序列,特質,狀態,生活品質,快樂,自尊, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | time series,trait,state,quality of life,happiness,global self-esteem, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 107 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.98 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。