請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40132完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉光輝(Kuang-Hui Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Yeng Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 郭姿吟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T16:41:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing research, 43(1), 1-10.
Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004). The importance of being flexible. Psychological Science, 15(7), 482. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715. Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822-834. Camacho, C., Higgins, E., & Luger, L. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 498-510. Cavallo, J. V., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). Taking chances in the face of threat: romantic risk regulation and approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 737-751. Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from' feeling right'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388-404. Cesario, J., & Higgins, E. (2008). Making message recipients 'Feel Right'. Psychological Science, 19(5), 415. Cesario, J., Higgins, E., & Scholer, A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 444. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. Cheng, C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 814-833. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101-109. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132. Freitas, A., Azizian, A., Travers, S., & Berry, S. (2005). The evaluative connotation of processing fluency: Inherently positive or moderated by motivational context? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(6), 636-644. Galinsky, A., Leonardelli, G., Okhuysen, G., & Mussweiler, T. (2005). Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: Promoting distributive and integrative success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1087. Higgins. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230. Higgins, Shah, & Friedman. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515-525. Higgins, E., Friedman, R., Harlow, R., Idson, L., Ayduk, O., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23. Higgins, E., Idson, L., Freitas, A., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140-1153. Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 276. Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1992). The elusive criterion of fit in human resources staffing decisions. Human Resource Planning, 15(4), 47-67. Kirchmeyer, C. (1995). Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 67-83. Kristof, A. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340. Liberman, N., Idson, L., Camacho, C., & Higgins, E. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135-1145. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality (3 ed.). New York: Harper Collins. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268. Moynihan, L. M., & Peterson, R. S. (2001). A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 327-378. Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268-277. Santelli, A., Struthers, C., & Eaton, J. (2009). Fit to forgive: Exploring the interaction between regulatory focus, repentance, and forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 381-394. Sassenberg, K., Jonas, K. J., Shah, J. Y., & Brazy, P. C. (2007). Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 249-267. Schneider, B., Goldstiein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747-773. Settoon, R., & Mossholder, K. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person-and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255-267. Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1317-1338. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1-39. Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 558-568. Uskul, A., Sherman, D., & Fitzgibbon, J. (2009). The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain-vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 535-541. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/40132 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 文獻中對於調節焦點適配(Regulatory Fit)的討論相當廣泛，但卻侷限於個體內的探討，而且並未探討調節焦點適配是否有不同的表現方式。因此，本研究欲探討調節適配性在人際間關係情境的影響效果，並同時探討於人際調節適配性的不同表現方式。本研究以面試影片做為研究情境，請受試者觀看求職者面試影片，並依照與其共事的意願及是否願意提供協助作為評量。研究一結果符合預期，發現當關係和諧為互動關係目標時，受試者給予與其相同調節焦點的求職者較高的評價，呈現相似適配性(similarity fit)。研究二加入團體績效表現為互動關係目標，並思考以最佳團體績效表現為主要目標時，則適配的選擇為互補(complementary fit)，亦即當是互動關係目標為團體績效時，受試者會給予與其調節焦點互補者較高評價，並且較願意提供這樣的人協助。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In two studies, this research explored how regulatory fit operates interpersonally and how its nature varies according to the goal emphasized. Taiwanese participants viewed videos of job interviewees displaying different regulatory orientations. Study 1 hypothesized and found that when harmonious relationships were emphasized, others with congruence in regulatory focus were evaluated highly on anticipated interaction quality and value as a partner, suggesting similar regulatory focus between individual induces regulatory fit. Study 2 explored whether fit manifests differently according to the situation. Results indicated that when team performance was emphasized, complementary regulatory focus led to fit. Participants rated others with a complementary regulatory orientation more favorably, and indicated higher intention to provide assistance than they did congruent orientated others. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-14T16:41:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97227109-1.pdf: 483889 bytes, checksum: b5482ea1c54ba65f90b47f046c79eec3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
Study1 7 Method 7 Results 13 Discussion 16 Study 2 18 Method 21 Results 23 Discussion 27 General Discussion 28 Implications and Future Directions 32 Conclusion 36 References 37 Tables 44 Figures 47 Appendices 55 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 調節適配 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人際關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 互補性適配 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 調節焦點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | interpersonal relationship | en |
| dc.subject | complementary fit | en |
| dc.subject | regulatory focus. | en |
| dc.subject | regulatory fit | en |
| dc.title | 情境效應對人際間調節適配性之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Similar vs. Complementary: The Effect of Regulatory Fit in Interpersonal Domains | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孫蒨如(Chien-Ru Sun),顏志龍(Chih-Long Yen),蘇珍頤(Jenny Chen-Yi Su) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 人際關係,互補性適配,調節適配,調節焦點。, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | complementary fit,interpersonal relationship,regulatory fit,regulatory focus., | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 472.55 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。