請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3973
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 袁孝維 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jhen Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉鎮 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:39:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-08 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:39:31Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-03-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-02-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王穎、陳怡君、高林助 (1989) 台灣特有亞種環頸雉的棲地調查報告,內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處,台灣,屏東縣。
王穎、李志宏 (1990) 台灣特有亞種環頸雉之試放-無線電追蹤之研究。內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處,台灣,屏東縣。 王穎、孫元勳、李水欽、蘇倩儀 (1990) 台灣特有亞種環頸雉現況之調查-野外現況及龍仔埔地區之野放。內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處,台灣,屏東縣。 王嘉雄、吳森雄、黃光瀛、楊秀英、蔡仲晃、蔡牧起、蕭慶亮 (1991)台灣野鳥圖鑑,頁78-79,亞舍圖書有限公司,台北。 行政院農委會林務局 (2009) 保育野生動物名錄,http://www.forest.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=44417&ctNode=631&mp=10. 2013 李培芬、吳采諭、柯智仁 (2008) 以鳥類作為生態指標-鳥類監測計畫簡介,全球變遷通訊雜誌(60):25-35。 李志宏 (1991) 環頸雉現況及飼養個體釋放後之無線電追蹤研究,碩士論文,國立師範大學,台北市。 呂碧卿 (2007) 台東平原釋迦產業的產銷社會空間,碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學。 周鎮 (1990) 鳥與史料,中華民國動物保護協會,台灣,台北市。 周彥瑜 (2012) 以景觀生態觀點探討台灣鄉村地區樹籬廊道與鳥類族群相關性之研究—以竹北地區為例,碩士論文,國立中興大學 周彥瑜、張俊彥 (2005) 鄉村地區樹籬廊道生態效益之研究.興大園藝第30 卷第 4 期,77-90 洪心怡、林容仟、姚正得、劉影、李壽先 (2009) 金門地區環頸雉亞種地位鑑定,國家公園學報19(4):21-31。 陳美惠 (2004) 台灣環頸雉型態變異與遺傳多樣性之研究,博士論文,國立台灣大學,台灣,台北市。 國土測繪中心 (2013) 國土利用調查成果資訊網, http://lui.nlsc.gov.tw/LUWeb/Home/Content.aspx?MUID=3670dcfe-dfea-446d-8afd-ee1ca7abc054,2013。 張萬福 (1985) 台灣的陸鳥,頁50-60,禽影圖書有限公司,台北市。 葉玉君 (2004) 花蓮兆豐農場台灣環頸雉活動範圍,活動模式與棲地利用之研究,碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市。 葉玉玲 (2003) 台灣環頸雉結群與警戒行為之研究,碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台灣,台北市。 廖本興 (2012) 台灣野鳥圖鑑-陸鳥篇,晨星出版社,台北。 劉小如、丁宗蘇、方偉宏、林文宏、蔡牧起、顏重威 (2010) 台灣鳥類誌(上),行政院農業委員會林務局,台北。 謝寶森 (1986) 穿越線法與圓圈法在鳥類族群密度估算之比較,博士論文,國立台灣大學,台灣,台北市。 魏彤竹 2003 運用地景生態學原則在評估東華大學校園空間規劃-以環頸雉為例,碩士論文,國立東華大學,花蓮縣。 嚴重威 (1984) 台灣的野生鳥類一、陸鳥,渡假出版有限公司,台灣,台北市。 譚增偉、王鐘和 (2002) 當今農業對輪作制度應有的認識-輪作制度與永續性農業的關係、技術服務 50: 25-29、農業試驗所。 Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., & Kenward, R. E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology, 74(5), 1313-1325. Andrén, H., Angelstam, P., Lindström, E., & Widén, P. 1985. Differences in predation pressure in relation to habitat fragmentation: an experiment. Oikos, 273-277. Benhamou, S. and Cornelis, D. 2010. Incorporating movement behavior and barriers to improve biological relevance of kernel home range space use Estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 1353–1360. Bennett Jr, R. S., Prince, H. H. 1981. Influence of agricultural pesticides on food preference and consumption by ring-necked pheasants. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 74-82. Block, W. M., Brennan, L. A. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology. Current ornithology, 11, 35-91. Börger, L., Franconi, N., De Michele, G., Gantz, A., Meschi, F., Manica, A, Coulson, T.I.M. 2006 . Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates . Journal of Animal Ecology, 75(6), 1393-1405. Brown, J. S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22(1), 37-47. Bogenschutz, T. R., Hubbard, D. E., Leif, A. P. 1995. Corn and sorghum as a winter food source for ring-necked pheasants. The Journal of wildlife management, 776-784. Buckland, S. T. 2006. Point-transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies. The Auk, 123(2), 345-357. Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of mammalogy, 24(3), 346-352. Bunyan, P. J., Jennings, D. M., Taylor, A. 1968 . Organophosphorus poisoning. Diagnosis of poisoning in pheasants owing to a number of common pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 16(2), 332-339. Clark, W. R., Schmitz, R. A., & Bogenschutz, T. R. 1999. Site selection and nest success of ring-necked pheasants as a function of location in Iowa landscapes. The Journal of wildlife management, 976-989. Clements, J. F., Schulenberg,T. S.,Iliff,M.J.,Sullivan,B.L., Wood,C.L.,Roberson,D. 2012. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.7.:http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/downloadable-clements-checklist. 2013. Colin,J.B. Burgess, N.D., Hill,D.A., Mustoe,S.2000. Bird census techniques. Academic Press. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States. Dahlgren, R. B., Linder, R. L. 1971. Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on pheasant reproduction,behavior, and survival. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 315-319. Dale, F. H. 1951. The refuge in pheasant management. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 15(4), 337-346. De Witt, J. B. 1955. Pesticide Toxicity, Effects of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides upon Quail and Pheasants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 3(8), 672-676. Đorđević, N., Popović, Z., Beuković, D., Beuković, M., Đorđević, M. 2012. The importance of arable land in Serbia to the feed [of] pheasant and brown hare and the number of populations. Proceedings of Research Papers, 18. Eberhardt, L. L. 1978. Transect methods for population studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1-31. Einarsen, A. S. 1945. Some Factors Affecting Ring-Necked Pheasant Population Density: Part II. The Murrelet, 26(3), 39-44. Emlen, J. T. 1971. Population densities of birds derived from transect counts. The Auk, 88(2), 323-342. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 487-515. Fahrig, L. 1997. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 603-610. Faaborg, J. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science, 267(31), 93-102. Frey, S., Conover, M., Borgo, J., & Messmer, T. 2003. Factors influencing pheasant hunter harvest and satisfaction. Human dimensions of wildlife, 8(4), 277-286. Gates, J. M., & Hale, J. B. (1975). Reproduction of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population. Greenberg, R. E., Etter, S. L., & Anderson, W. L. 1972. Evaluation of proximal primary feather criteria for aging wild pheasants. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 700-705. Gitzen, R. A., & Millspaugh, J. J. 2003. Comparison of least-squares cross-validation bandwidth options for kernel home-range estimation. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 823-831. Haroldson, K. J., Kimmel, R. O., Riggs, M. R., & Berner, A. H. 2006. Association of ring-necked pheasant, gray partridge, and meadowlark abundance to Conservation Reserve Program grasslands. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70(5), 1276-1284. Hanson, L. E., Progulske, D. R. 1973. Movements and cover preferences of pheasants in South Dakota. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 454-461.Hall, Hayne, D.W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range.Journal of Mammalogy.30:1-18. Hemson, G., Johnson, P., South, A., Kenward, R., Ripley, R., Macdonald, D. 2005.Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home‐range analyses with least‐squares cross‐validation. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74(3), 455-463. Henry, A. C., Hosack, D. A., Johnson, C. W., Rol, D., Bentrup, G. 1999. Conservation corridors in the United States: Benefits and planning guidelines. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 54(4), 645-650. Herkert, J. R. 1994. The effects of habitat fragmentation on midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological applications, 461-471. Hill, D., Robertson, P. 1988. The pheasant: ecology, management and conservation.Oxford: BSP Professional Books. Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. M., & Lewis, J. S. 2007. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology, 88(9), 2354-2363. Hutto, R. L. 1985. Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds. Habitat selection in birds, 455, 476.Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61(1), 65-71. Johnson, H. E. 1951. Multiflora rose hips as pheasant food. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 15(2), 221-222. Johnson, M. D. 2007. Measuring habitat quality: a review. The Condor, 109(3), 489-504. Karatzoglou, A. Smola, A. Hornik, K.Zeileis, A. 2004. “kernlab-An S4 Package for “Kernel Method in R.”. J Statistical Software 11:1-20.(URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v11/i90.). Kernohan, B.J., Gitzen, R.A. Millspaugh, J.J. 2001 Analysis of animal space use and movements. Radio tracking and Animal Populations (eds J.J.Millspaugh & J.M.Marzluff), pp. 125–166. Academic Press, San Diego. Kenward, R.E.2001. A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic press, London. Krausman, P. R., & Morrison, M. L. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 173-182. Krausman, P. R. 1999. Some basic principles of habitat use. Grazing behavior of livestock and wildlife, 85-90. Kuck, T. L., Dahlgren, R. B., & Progulske, D. R. 1970. Movements and behavior of hen pheasants during the nesting season. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 626-630. Labisky, R. F. 1968. Nightlighting: its use in capturing pheasants, prairie chickens, bobwhites, and cottontails. Urbana, USA: Illinois Natural History Survey. Leif, A. P. 1994. Survival and reproduction of wild and pen-reared ring-necked pheasant hens. The Journal of wildlife management, 501-506. Litvaitis, J. A., Titus, K., Anderson, E. M. 1994. Measuring vertebrate use of terrestrial habitats and foods. Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. 5th ed. Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Md, 254-274. MacGowan, B. J. 2003. Designing hardwood tree plantings for wildlife. Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center. Marcstrom, V. Kenward, R.E., Karlbom, M.1989. Survival of ring-necked pheasants with backpacks, necklaces, and leg bands. Journal of Wildlife management 53:808-810. Millspaugh, J., Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press. Mohr, C.O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. The America Midland Naturalist 37:223-249. Morrison, M. L., Marcot, B., & Mannan, W. 2006. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Island Press. Moorcroft, P. R. 2006. Mechanistic home range analysis (Vol. 43). Princeton University Press. Moorcroft, P. R., Lewis, M. A., & Crabtree, R. L. 1999. Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model. Ecology, 80(5), 1656-1665. Mysterud, A., & Ims, R. A. 1998. Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations. Ecology, 79(4), 1435-1441. Andren, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 355-366. Ohlsson, T., & Smith, H. G. 2001. Early nutrition causes persistent effects on pheasant morphology. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 74(2), 212-218. Powell, R.A. 2000 Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences (eds L.Boitani & T.K.Fuller), pp. 65–110. Columbia University, New York. Ping, D., ShiRen, J., & Yang, Z. 2000. The study on fragmentation of habitat used by Elliot's pheasant in western Zhejiang. Zoological Research, 21(1), 65-69. Perkins, A. L., Clark, W. R., Riley, T. Z., & Vohs, P. A. 1997. Effects of landscape and weather on winter survival of ring-necked pheasant hens. The Journal of wildlife management, 634-644. Riley, T. Z. 1995. Association of the Conservation Reserve Program with ring-necked pheasant survey counts in Iowa. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 386-390. Riley, S. P. (1999). How to Design A Pheasant Management Area.Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. Sample, D. W. 1989. Grassland birds in southern Wisconsin: habitat preference, population trends, and response to land use changes (Vol. 1). University of Wisconsin--Madison. Sage, R. B., Woodburn, M. I. A., Draycott, R. A. H., Hoodless, A. N., Clarke, S.2009. The flora and structure of farmland hedges and hedgebanks near to pheasant release pens compared with other hedges. Biological Conservation, 142(7), 1362-1369. Schottler, S. P., Port, J., DeGolier, T. 2008. An efficient method for quickly surveying Pheasant nesting site preferences. Ecological Restoration, 26(3), 198-200. Schmitz, R. A., Clark, W. R. 1999. Survival of ring-necked pheasant hens during spring in relation to landscape features. The Journal of wildlife management, 147-154. Seutin, G., White, B. N., Boag, P. T. 1990. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analysis. Can. J. Zool.69:82-90. Silverman, B.W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall. Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods.Methuen,London, United Kingdom. Stoate, C. 2002. Multifunctional use of a natural resource on farmland: wild pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) management and the conservation of farmland passerines. Biodiversity & Conservation, 11(4), 561-573. Stollberg, B. P., & Hine, R. L. 1952. Food habit studies of ruffed grouse, pheasant, quail and mink in Wisconsin. Stromborg, K. L. 1977. Seed treatment pesticide effects on pheasant reproduction at sublethal doses. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 632-642. Swenk, M. H. 1930. The food habits of the ring-necked pheasant in central Nebraska. University of Nebraska, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. Thomas, J. W. 1979. Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington (pp. 60-77). Washington, DC, USA: USDA Forest Service.Leopold, A. 1987. Game management. Univ of Wisconsin Press. Trautman, C. G. 1952. Pheasant Food Habits in South Dakota. Technical Bulletin,(1). Venturato, E., Cavallini, P., & Dessì-Fulgheri, F. 2010. Are pheasants attracted or repelled by roads? A test of a crucial assumption for transect censuses. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56(3), 233-237. Warner, R. E., Etter, S. L. 1985. Farm conservation measures to benefit wildlife, especially pheasant populations. In Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Warner, R. E., Etter, S. L. 1989. Hay cutting and the survival of pheasants: a long-term perspective. The Journal of wildlife management, 455-461. Warner, R. E. 1994. Agricultural land use and grassland habitat in Illinois: future shock for midwestern birds?. Conservation Biology, 8(1), 147-156. Warner, R. E., Mankin, P. C., David, L. M., Etter, S. L. 1999. Declining survival of ring-necked pheasant chicks in Illinois during the late 1900s. The Journal of wildlife management, 705-710. Wand, M.P. & Jones, M.C. 1995 Kernel Smoothing. London: Chapman & Hall. Wiens, J. A. 1995. Habitat fragmentation: island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis, 137(s1), S97-S104. White, G.C., Garrot, R.A.1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, C.A. Whitmore, R. W., Pruess, K. P., Gold, R. E. 1986. Insect food selection by 2-week-old ring-necked pheasant chicks. The Journal of wildlife management, 223-228. Worton, B. J. 1987. A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological modelling, 38(3), 277-298. Worton, B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology, 70, 164–168. Worton, B.J. 1995 Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. Journal of Wildlife Management, 59,794–800.and weather on winter survival of ring-necked pheasant hens. The Journal of wildlife management, 634-644. Zheng, Z.X., 1978. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Galliformes, vol. 4. Science Press, Beijing,China.Madge, S. McGowan, P. 2002. Pheasants, Partridges, and Grouse. one ed. Princeton, New Jersey. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3973 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究於2012年4月至2013年3月於台東縣香蘭村,進行台灣環頸雉於農作地景下的活動範圍與棲地偏好之研究。本人利用無線電追蹤1隻環頸雉公鳥,採行MCP(minimum convex polygon)法與kernel法計算活動範圍面積,並利用compositional analysis分析環頸雉對棲地類型的偏好次序。在活動範圍方面,環頸雉全年95%MCP活動面積為20公頃,95%kernel法活動面積為29.19公頃,活動範圍中心落於次生林內,各季活動範圍面積無顯著差異。棲地偏好順序依次為次生林、草生地、農作地、道路系統。研究結果顯示的棲地偏好可能因為次生林與草生地棲地提供環頸雉遮蔽的功能,適合躲避天敵干擾,其中草生地為環頸雉築巢棲地,也是環頸雉偏好的夜棲地點。在經營管理建議上以保留次生林與草生地棲地為主要目標,並且增加廊道連接次生林與草生地棲地。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Formosan Ring-necked Pheasant(Phasianus colchicus formosanus) is an endangered subspecies in Taiwan.I studied home range and babitat preference of Ring-necked Pheasant in agricultural landscape which obtain rare woodland and grassland.I used radiotelemetry to monitor the MCP and kernel home range from 1 male Ring-necked Pheasant in Siang-lan, Taitung city from April 2012 to March 2013. Home range area was 20 ha from 95%MCP and 29.19 ha from 95% kernel. Home range center was located in woodland . home range size by season are not difference.Sort of the habitat preference of Ring-necked Pheasant is woodland, grassland, farming area, road and artificial building. Woodland and grassland are highly important for Pheasants beacause Woodlands and grassland could be the breeding habitat and roosting habitat.For management stretegies, we suggested preserved woodland and grassland and developed ecological corridors by restore woodland and grassland to connect fragmented habitat. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:39:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R99625030-1.pdf: 4237778 bytes, checksum: ba7fa95533e79210e19e3be960823711 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………I
謝詞……………………………………………………………………...II 摘要……………………………………………………………….…….IV Abstract…………………………………………………………………..V 目錄……………………………………………………………………..VI 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………VII 表目錄………………………………………………………………...VIII 第一章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………1 第二章 環頸雉的活動範圍與棲地偏好………………………………7 前言…………………………………………………………………7 方法…………………………………………………………………9 結果………………………………………………………………17 討論………………………………………………………………20 參考文獻……………………………………………………….……23 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 環頸雉的棲地利用與偏好研究-以臺東香蘭為個案 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Habitat use and preference of Ring-necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus)
-A case from Siang-lan, Taitung | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王穎,吳海音 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 環頸雉,活動範圍,棲地偏好,次生林,草生地, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Ring-necked Pheasant,home range,habitat preference,woodland,grassland, | en |
dc.relation.page | 55 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-02-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 4.14 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。