請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39548
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王全三 | |
dc.contributor.author | Shih-Hui Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃詩惠 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:31:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
李建然、許書偉、湯麗芬,2008,內部稽核品質與財務報表品質之關聯性,輔仁 管理評論第15卷第3期,頁33-62。 李建然、廖益興、張光佑,2007,法律責任與財務報表品質之關聯性研究-從台 灣上市(櫃)公司海外集資的角度探討,管理與系統期刊第14卷第2期,頁 265-292。 俞洪昭,1988,重要性判斷之研究-透視模型的應用,國立政治大學會計學研究 所碩士論文。 陳麗如,2007,審計品質與異常審計公費關聯性之實證研究,國立台灣大學會計 學研究所碩士論文。 黃怡千,2006,非審計服務對會計師獨立性影響之研究:門檻制公費揭露制度, 國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 黃馨儀,1998,會計師事務所提供非審計服務之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究 所碩士論文。 楊世瑩,2010,SPSS統計分析實務第二版,旗標出版股份有限公司。 劉嘉雯、王泰昌、賴信蒼,2009,訴訟風險與大型會計師事務所之客戶財務風險 可接受水準,台大管理論叢第20卷第1期,頁1-40。 英文部份 Bell, T.B., W.R. Landsman, and D.A. Shackelford. 2001. Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 39(1):35-43. Bhattacharjee, S., K. Moreno, and J.A. Yardley. 2005. Auditors as Underwriters: An Alternative Framework. International Journal of Auditing 9:1-19. Carcello, J.V., and T.L. Neal. 2000. Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting. The Accounting Review 75(4):453-467. Carcello, J.V., and T.L. Neal. 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals following “New” Going-Concern Reports. Accounting Review 78(1): 95-117. Charles, S.L., S.M. Glover, and N.Y. Sharp. 2010. The Association between Financial Reporting Risk and Audit Fees before and after the Historic Events Surrounding SOX. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29(1):15-39. Cohen, J.R., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2004. The Corporate Governance Mosaic and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Literature 23: 87-152. Cunningham, L.A. 2004. Choosing Gatekeepers: The Financial Statement Insurance Alternative to Auditor Liability. Working paper, Boston College Law School. Dye, R.A. 1993. Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth. Journal of Political Economy 101(5):887-914. Francis, J.R., and D. Wang. 2005. Impact of the SEC's Public Fee Disclosure Requirement on Subsequent Period Fees and Implications for Market Efficiency. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24(s-1):145-160. Heninger, W.G. 2001. The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review 76(1):111-126. Higgs, J.L., and D. Dickins. 2005. Interpretation and Use of Auditor Fee Disclosures. Financial Analysts Journal 61(3):96-102. Hogan, C.E., and M.S. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Fees in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies?. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(1):219-242. Klein, A. 1998. Affiliated Directors: Puppets of Management or Effective Directors? Working paper No. 98-010, Center for Law and Business, New York University. Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(3):375-400. Krishnan, J., and J. Krishnan. 1996. The Role of Economic Trade-offs in the Audit Opinion Decision: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of accounting, Auditing and Finance 11(4):565-586. Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P.D. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69(3):505-527. Maher, M.W., and J.D. Lyon. 2005. The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct. Journal of Accounting Research 43(1):133–151. Palmrose, Z.V. 1986. Audit Fees and Auditor Size:Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24(4):97-110. Palmrose, Z.V. 1997. Who Got Sued? Journal of Accountancy 183(3):67-69. Romero, S. 2010. Auditor Independence: Third Party Hiring and Paying Auditors. Journal of Business 5(3):298-314. Rittenberg, L.E., B.J. Schwieger, and K.M. Johnstone. 2008. Auditing: A Business Risk Approach , 6th Edition. Thomson South-Western. Seetharaman, A., F.A. Gul, and S. Lynn. 2002. Litigation Risk and Audit Fees: Evidence from UK Firms Cross-Listed on U.S. Exchanges. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:91–115. Simunic, D.A. 1980. The Pricing of Audit Services:Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 22(3):161-190. Simunic, D.A. 1984. Auditing, Consulting, and Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22(2):679-702. Stanley, J.D. 2011. Is the Audit Fee Disclosure a Leading Indicator of Clients’ Business Risk? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Forthcoming. Stanley, J.D., and T.U.O. Alabama. 2007. An Examination of Unexpected Audit Fees as An Indicator of Distressed Clients’ Business Risk. Working paper, University of Alabama. Stocken, P.C. and J. Morgan. 1998. The Effects of Business Risk on Audit Pricing. Review of Accounting Studies 3:365–385. Verreccia, R.E. 2001. Essays on Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 97-180. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39548 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 我國公開發行公司在特定條件,應揭露會計師公費資訊於年報,以使投資人瞭解會計師收取公費的組成要素及內涵,作為判斷公費允當性的基礎,並以非審計公費占總公費的比例判斷會計師的獨立性。而文獻及審計理論顯示審計公費多寡與受查公司風險高低直接相關,故本研究的主要目的在探討公費資訊的揭露,是否能夠提供投資人做為衡量公司財務報表風險的指標,及影響其對於會計師訴訟風險之判斷。
本研究以問卷方式進行,共分二大部分,第一部分探討審計公費對財務報表風險的影響程度,在回收的106份有效問卷中,本研究結果發現:公費上升幅度愈大,財務報表風險愈高;加入會計師意見對財務報表風險的影響後,投資人傾向以意見做為衡量財務報表風險的指標,但當公費上升幅度很大(在本研究設定為上升50%)時,投資人較能感受到審計公費對財務報表風險的影響。因此,審計公費及會計師意見皆可為判斷財務報表風險的指標,而當審計公費變動幅度很大時,審計公費的揭露對財務報表風險的影響更為明顯。 第二部分探討揭露審計公費是否影響投資人對會計師應承受訴訟風險的判斷,進而影響其遭受重大投資損失時,向會計師求償的可能性。本研究結果發現:無論會計師出具的意見為何,在公費資訊揭露之後,投資人認為會計師應負的訴訟賠償增加。可能係因公費的揭露使投資人了解會計師訴訟風險為審計公費之重要組成要素,因此更加認為會計師事務所本應負擔部分的賠償。另外,會計師出具無保留意見時,所承受的訴訟責任較否定及保留意見還重。即使受測者主要為會計系所學生,應懂得會計師僅對財務報表做合理確信,不擔保公司財務報表的正確性,仍無法改變此結論。而這也支持了文獻上的說法,會計師出具無保留意見以外的查核報告,能夠增加其抗辯的能力,適時降低所面臨的訴訟風險。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Financial supervisory commission(FSC) of Taiwan has required public companies to disclose auditor fees when certain conditions are fulfilled. The main reason from FSC is to make auditor fees publicly available, helping investors to understand the compositions of auditor fees and measuring the auditor independence by the proportion of non-audit fees. Prior researches and auditing theories find that auditor fees are determined mainly by risks of companies. This study targets to discuss whether audit fees disclosure provides information which is about financial reporting risk and auditor litigation risk.
This paper is separated into two parts and based on 106 valid questionnaires mainly from students of accounting majored. Part I discusses whether audit fees is a sign of financial reporting risk or not. This study finds that financial reporting risk becomes higher as audit fees increasing. When considering the effect of financial reporting risk from auditor opinion, investors tend to use opinion as a signal of companies’ financial reporting risk. But when audit fees increase greatly (50% in this study), investors would take the impact of audit fees into consideration. Consequently, both audit fees and opinion are signals of financial reporting risk and the effect of audit fees would become more significant when the variation of audit fees increases greatly. Part II discusses whether audit fees disclosure influences investors’ consideration of auditor litigation risk and the possibility to sue auditors when suffering great investment loss. The results indicate that the disclosure would increase auditors’ litigation loss regardless of the types of opinion rendered by auditors. These are possibly because investors fully understand that litigation risk is a primary determinant of audit fees; therefore, they would take auditors’ litigation payment for granted. In addition, the results also indicate that auditor litigation loss is expected to be the highest when unqualified opinion is rendered, even when participants are accounting-majored students who understand that auditors only make reasonable assurance of financial statements. These results indicate that modified reports provide some defense against auditor litigations, consistent with prior researches. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:31:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98722044-1.pdf: 893836 bytes, checksum: 687850ca92d205f5143e6d3f85830346 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書.......................................... i
謝辭..................................................... ii 中文摘要.............................................. iii Abstrac......................................... iv 目錄................................................... vi 圖目錄................................................. viii 表目錄................................................. ix 第一章 緒論............................................. 1 第一節 研究動機及目的................................... 1 第二節 研究方法及結果................................... 5 第三節 研究貢獻........................................ 8 第四節 研究架構........................................ 9 第二章 文獻探討......................................... 10 第一節 審計公費揭露之相關文獻探討................. 10 第二節 財務報表風險之相關文獻探討................. 11 第三節 審計公費與財務報表風險關聯性之文獻探討... 13 第四節 審計公費與會計師訴訟風險關聯性之文獻探討.. 15 第三章 研究設計與方法....................................... 18 第一節 研究主題及問卷設.................................... 18 第二節 問卷內容.......................................... 20 第三節 問卷對象........................................... 22 第四節 統計檢定.......................................... 24 第四章 研究結果分析......................................... 25 第一節 審計公費之資訊內涵-財務報表風險.............. 25 第二節 審計公費之資訊內涵-會計師訴訟風險............ 36 第五章 結論及建議........................................... 41 第一節 研究結論........................................... 41 第二節 研究限制及建議...................................... 42 參考文獻.................................................. 43 附錄:研究問卷............................................. 47 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 揭露審計公費資訊內涵之探討:財務報表風險及會計師訴訟風險 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Information Contents of Disclosing Audit Fees: Financial Reporting Risk and Auditor Litigation Risk | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳清在,董水量 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 審計公費,揭露,財務報表風險,會計師訴訟風險,會計師意見, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Audit fees,Disclosure,Financial reporting risk,Litigation Risk,Opinion, | en |
dc.relation.page | 52 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 872.89 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。