請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39490完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔣明晃 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Wen Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張正文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:29:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, J.C., Hakansson, H. and Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. The Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1—15.
Aulinger, A. (2003). Supply chains as strategic alliances - a route map for cooperation management. In Seuring, S., Moller, M., Goldbach, M., and Schneidewind, U. (Eds.), Strategy and organization in supply chains. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, New York, 225—238. Bates, H., and Slack, N. (1998). What happens when the supply chain manages you? A knowledge-based response. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 4(1), 63—72. Baum, J., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B.S. (2000). Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267—294. Bensaou, M. (1999). Portfolios of buyer-supplier relationships. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 35—44. Benton, W.C. and Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 1—21. Bigne, J.E., Blesa, A., Kuster, I. and Andreu, L. (2004). Market orientation: an antecedent to the industrial manufacturer’s power. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2), 175—193. Brandenburger, A., and Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-Opetition: A Revolution Mindset That Combines Competition and Cooperation. New York: Doubleday. Brennan, D.R., Turnbull, P.W. and Wilson, D.T. (2003). Dyadic adaptation in business-to-business markets. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1636—1665. Buhman, C., Kekre, S., and Singhal, J. (2005). Interdisciplinary and interorganizational research: establishing the science of enterprise networks. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 493—513. Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: the structure of competition. New York: Harvard University Press. Chen, I.J., and Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119—150. Cool, K. and Henderson, J. (1998). Power and firm profitability in supply chains: French manufacturing industry in 1993. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 909—26. Cox, A. (2001). Understanding buyer and supplier power: a framework for procurement and supply competence. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 8—15. Cox, A. (2004). The art of the possible: relationship management in power regimes and supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 346—356. Cox, A., Ireland, P., Lonsdale, C., Sanderson, J., and Watson, G. (2002). Supply chains, markets and power mapping buyer and supplier power regimes. London: Routledge. Crook, T.R. and Combs, J.G. (2007). Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 546—555. Croom, S.R., Romano, P., and Giannakis, M. (2000). Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(1), 67—83. David, U., and Barney, J.B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management, 9(3), 471—481. De Toni, A., and Nassimbeni, G. (1995). Supply networks: genesis, stability and logistics implications. OMEGA, 23(4), 403—418. Dickson, P.R. (1983). Distributor portfolio analysis and the channel dependence matrix: New techniques for understanding and managing the channel. Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 35—55. Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dyer, J. and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660—679. Dyer, J., and Hatch, N. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 701—719. Easton, G. (1992). Industrial networks: a review. In Axelsson, B., and Easton, G. (Eds.), Industrial networks: a new view of reality. London: Routledge, 1—27. Emerson, R.M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31—40. Fink, R.C., Edelman, L.F., Hatten, K.J., and James, W.L. (2006). Transaction cost economics, resource dependence theory and customer-supplier relationships. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(3), 497—529. Ford, D. and McDowell, R. (1999). Managing business relationships by analyzing the effects and value of different actions. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 429—42. French, J.R. and Raven, B. (2001). The Bases of Social Power. In Asherman, I.G. and Asherman, S.V. (Ed.), The Negotiation Sourcebook, Human Resource Development Press, MA, 61—73. Gadde, L.E., Huemer, L. and Hakansson, H. (2003). Strategizing in industrial networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 357—64. Gadde, L-E. and Hakansson, H (1992). Analysing change and stability in distribution channels - a network approach. In Axelsson, B. and Easton, G. (Ed.), Industrial networks: A new view of reality. London: Routledge, 166—79. Giles, L. Sun Tzu on the Art of War. Luzac & Co., London, 1910. Grant, R.M. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 450—454. Grant, R.R. (1997). Measuring corporate power: Assessing the options. Journal of Economic, 31(2), 453—460. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Network. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293—317. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203—215. Hakansson, H., and Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133—139. Hakansson, H., and Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: the network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5(3), 187—200. Hakansson, H., and Snehota, I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks. London: Routledge. Hall, D.J., and Saias, M.A. (1980). Strategy follows structure. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 149—163. Halley, A., and Beaulieu, M. (2009). Mastery of operational competencies in the context of supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(1), 49—63. Harary, F., Norman, R.Z. and Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: an Introduction to the theory of directed graphs. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Hardy, C. (1996). Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7, 3—16. Harland, C.M., and Knight, L.A. (2001). Supply network strategy role and competence requirements. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(4), 476—489. Hart, P. and Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23—42. Hite, J.M., and Hesterly, W.S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275—286. Huemer, L. (2006). Supply management: Value creation, coordination and positioning in supply relationships. Long Range Planning, 39(2), 133—153. Ireland, R.D., and Webb, J.W. (2007). A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 482—497. Jarillo, J.C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31—41. Johanson, J., and Mattsson L. (1987). Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction-cost approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17(1), 34—48. Johanson, J., and Mattsson, L.-G. (1992). Network positions and strategic action - an analytical framework. In Axelsson, B., and Easton, G. (Eds.), Industrial networks: a new view of reality. London: Routledge, 205—214. Ketchen, D.J., and Hult, G.T.M. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: the case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 573—580. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R.E. and Wan, W.P. (2004). Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 613—636. Kothandaraman, P., and Wilson, D.T. (2001). The future of competition: value-creating networks. Industrial Marketing and Management, 30(4), 379—389. Krajewski, L., Wei, J.C. and Tang, LL. (2005). Responding to schedule changes in build-to-order supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 23(5), 452—469. Lambert, D.M., and Cooper, M.C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65—83. Lambert, D.M., Cooper, M.C., and Pagh, J.D. (1998). Supply chain management: implementation issues and research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1—20. Lamming, R., Johnsen, T., Zheng, J., and Harland, C. (2000). An initial classification of supply networks, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(6), 675—691. Leger, P.M., Cassivi, L., Hadaya, P., and Caya, O. (2006). Safeguarding mechanisms in a supply chain network. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6), 759—777. Lin, N., Cook, K.S., and Burt, R.S. (2001). Social capital: theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., and Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075—1082. Lusch, R.F. and Brown, J.R. (1982). A modified model of power in the marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 312—323. Maloni, M. and Benton, W.C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49—74. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360—13138. Mattsson, L-G. and Johanson, J. (2006). Discovering market networks. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 259-274. Mcgee, J., and Thomas, H. (1986). Strategic groups: theory, research and taxonomy. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 141—160. Medcof, J.W. (2001). Resource-based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 999—1012. Mills, J., Schmitz, J. and Frizelle, G. (2004). A strategic review of supply networks. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(10), 1012—1036. Moller, M. and Halinen, A. (1999). Business relationships and networks: Managerial challenge of network era. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 413—27. Munksgaard, K.B. (2010). Exploring perceptions of interdependencies: Strategic options in supplier-customer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman. 2010.06.013. Nassimbeni, G. (1998). Network structures and co-ordination mechanisms: a taxonomy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18(6), 538—554. Nohria, N. and Garcia-Pont, C. (1991). Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 105—1024. Patnayakuni, R., Rai, A., and Seth, N. (2006). Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1), 13—49. Peteraf, M. and Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18, 165—1686. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing. Pfeffer, J. (1988). A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations. In Mizruchi, M. S., and Schwartz, M. (Eds.), Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business. Cambridge University Press , 25—55. Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, Free Press, New York. Porter, M.E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609—6020. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116—145. Provan, K.G., Beyer, J.M. and Kruytbosch C. (1980). Environmental linkages and power in resource-dependence relations between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 200—2025. Ramsay, J. (1994). Purchasing power. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 1(3), 125—1238. Ramsay, J. (1996). Power measurement. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply, 2(2-3), 129—1243. Ritter, T., and Gemunden, H.G. (2003). Interorganizational relationships and networks: an overview. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 691—697. Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I.F., and Johnston, W.J. (2004). Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175—183. Ross, W.T., and Robertson, D.C. (2007). Compound relationships between firms. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 108—123. Singh, P.J., and Power, D. (2009). The nature and effectiveness of collaboration between firms, their customers and suppliers: a supply chain perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 189—200. Stadtler, H. (2005). Supply chain management and advanced planning - basics, overview and challenges. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(3), 575—588. Stuart, T.E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668—698. Sullivan, M. and Mizrahi, A. (2008). Finite Mathematics: An Applied Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Svahn, S. and Westerlund, M. (2007). The modes of supply net management: A capability view. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 369—376. Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., and Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507—519. Todeva, E. (2006). Business networks: Strategy and structure. London: Routledge. Turnbull, P., Ford, D., and Cunningham, M. (1996). Interaction, relationships and networks in business markets: an evolving perspective. Journal of Business Industrial Marketing, 11(3/4), 44—62. Wagner, S.M., and Buko, C. (2005). An empirical investigation of knowledge-sharing in networks. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(4), 17—31. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1995). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wathne, K.H., and Heide, J.B. (2004). Relationship governance in a supply chain network. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 73—89. Wilkinson, I., and Young, L. (2002). On cooperating: firms, relations, networks. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 123—132. Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269—296. Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B.B., and Yeung, J.H.Y. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368—388. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39490 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 首先，利用分類法，對企業網絡進行分類，由核心公司本身與其上下游力量之關係，劃分成四種關係型態：(1) 上游網絡強勢、(2) 核心公司強勢、(3)下游網絡強勢、及(4) 核心公司弱勢。接下來，針對這四種分類型態，依照不同的網絡層級（上游網絡層、上游網絡層、核心公司層及整體網絡層等四層），進行情境分析以便深入探討各種企業網絡的結構與特性。最後，發展企業網絡策略，在這企業網絡情境分析情境上，需要一個理論為根礎。究竟何種競爭優勢是源自於網絡環境？或何種策略理論的分析是以網絡環境為主，所幸，關係觀點(Dyer & Singh, 1998)為此提供了一個很好的理論根礎。本研究利用企業網絡的特性以及關係觀點的理論根礎，提出了四個策略方針：專屬性投資、知識分享慣例、互補性能力與資源，以及網路地位，並依此策略方針，以核心公司為立場，針對其上游供應商網絡及下游客戶網絡發展相對應的策略。
深入的探索企業網絡從關係型態、情境分析，到策略後，接下來的問題是：在這企業網絡環境中，公司屬於何種企業網絡型態？公司如何瞭解本身的地位？其他公司的地位？「知己知彼，百戰不殆」，唯有瞭解本身定位、所處的網絡關係型態、情境，回應適合的企業網絡策略，方能達成競爭優勢。相同地，在這複雜交織的網絡關係中，公司間彼此有著不同直接或間接的力量相關連，且層層疊疊相互作用。這樣的情況下判斷所有公司的地位並非易事。為解決此問題，本論文分析企業網絡中公司間複雜的力量相互作用，發展一量化的企業網絡地位評估方法。此方法不但可對每間公司的地位進行量化分析，更可瞭解公司本身所屬的企業網絡型態及定位。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Firms require strategic actions to successfully respond to competition within their business networks. The business network is a complicated network model and its specific context depends on the relationships among network members. However, developing strategy under such circumstances is not straightforward; rather, it is built through a series of systematic analyses. To that end, this study first classifies business networks into four types regarding the role of the focal firm relative to its suppliers and buyers: (1) upstream network dominance, (2) focal firm dominance, (3) focal firm obedience, and (4) downstream network dominance. Once the types are determined, the context of each type is analyzed further at the upstream level, the focal firm level, the downstream level, and the whole network level. The context analyses offer a better understanding of network circumstances. However, what are the advantage sources of the network environment, and how does one develop strategy in such complex network circumstances? The relational view (Dyer & Singh, 1998) proposes a strong theoretical support. Based on the relational view and context analyses, our study develops the strategy of business networks for the focal firm both upstream and downstream in the following areas: relation-specific assets, knowledge-sharing routines, complementary resources and capabilities, and network position.
After completing the business network strategy, the questions now arise, how to identify the type of business network, how to identify firm’s position and other network members’ position, how to positioning the firm itself in business network? Identifying the firms’ positions is difficult when the firms facing complex and multilateral network relationships. Therefore, this study propose a quantitative method, applying graph theory to depict the positions in a matrix showing relative dominance, to measure a firm’s position in business networks. The advantageous/disadvantageous positions of each firm can be ranked, compared, and represented by quantitative values. Furthermore, managerial interpretation can be used to distinguish the direct or indirect competitive relations of firms, and generate a whole picture of business networks. Finally, integrating the firm’s positioning and the business network strategy benefit the firm to achieve competitive advantage. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:29:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-D94741010-1.pdf: 1045822 bytes, checksum: 934afce1b268042c330c4546a9907b57 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Motivation 1 1.2. Objectives 5 1.3. Research framework 11 1.4. Dissertation Organization 13 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 14 2.1. Network organization theory 15 2.2. Management and strategy of network 19 2.3. The structure of business networks 23 2.4. Power measures 25 CHAPTER III THE TYPES AND CONTEXTS OF BUSINESS NETWORKS 30 3.1. Types of business network relationship 30 3.2. The business network contexts 33 3.3. The summary of the business network contexts 39 CHAPTER IV THE STRATEGY OF BUSINESS NETWORKS 41 4.1. The determinants of business network strategy 42 4.2. Focal firm dominance 44 4.3. Upstream network dominance 49 4.4. Focal firm obedience 57 4.5. Downstream network dominance 62 CHAPTER V THE FIRMS’ POSITIONING OF BUSINESS NETWORKS 66 5.1. Business network position evaluating method 67 5.2. Examples 71 5.3. Results: findings and discussions 74 CHAPTER VI CASE STUDY: FC COMPANY 80 CHAPTER VII CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH 89 7.1. Conclusion 89 7.2. Contributions 92 7.3. Future research 95 REFERENCES 99 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 定位 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 關係觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地位 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 力量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Context | en |
| dc.subject | Power | en |
| dc.subject | Position | en |
| dc.subject | Relational view | en |
| dc.subject | Business network | en |
| dc.subject | Strategy | en |
| dc.subject | Relationship | en |
| dc.subject | Positioning | en |
| dc.title | 企業網絡中公司定位與策略之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring Business Networks: The Cooperative Strategy and Firms’ Positioning | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方文昌,林我聰,王孔政,范懿文,羅明琇 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業網絡,策略,地位,情境,關係,關係觀點,定位,力量, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Business network,Strategy,Context,Relationship,Relational view,Position,Power,Positioning, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。