請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39345
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 羅俊雄 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tai-Hsin Wen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 溫代欣 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:26:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-01-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-01-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1]Wen, Y.K. and Fouch, D.A. “ Proposed Statistical and Reliability Framework for Comparing and Evaluating Predictive Models for Evaluation and Design, and Critical Issues in Developing such Framework”, Report No. SAC/BD-9703, August 27, 1997.
[2]Hamnurger, R.O. “ Performance Based Analysis and Design Procedure for Moment Resisting Steel Frames”, September 14, 1998. [3]Jalayer, F., Cornell, A. “ Development of a Probability Based Deamnd and Capacity Factor Design Seismic Format”, Draft, Publication as a SAC Background Document, Aug. 11, 1998. [4]Luco, N., Cornell, A. “ Effects of Random Connection Fractures on the Demands and Reliability for a 3-story Pre-Northridge SMRF Structure”, the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Seattle, Washington, May 31-June 04,1998. [5]Krawinkler, H., “ Challenges and Progress in Performance Based Earthquake Engineering”, Proceeding of Seminar on Seismic Design for the next Century, NCREE-99-034. Taiwan, Dec. 1999. [6]ATC-40, “ Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”, Volume1&2, California Seismic Safety Commission November 1996. [7]張國鎮、林裕淵,“功能設計消能減震結構之位移設計法”,國立臺灣大學博士論文,2000年6月。 [8]張國鎮、吳詩斌,“鋼筋混凝土建築結構物耐震評估之研究”,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,2000年6月。 [9]趙書賢,“從能量及設計理念檢討結構耐震性能設計法”,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,羅俊雄教授指導,2003年6月。 [10] S. S. Chao and C.H. Loh, “ Development of design philosophy for performance based seismic design based on energy concept”, Proceeding of 13 WCEE, Vancouver, Canada, 2004. [11]Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., “ Evaluation of NSP to estimate Seismic Deformation: SDF System”, Journal of Structural Engineering, April 2000. [12]Chopra, A. K., and Geol, R. K., “ Capacity-Demand-Diagram Method Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 15, No.4, November 1999. [13]蕭淵升,“以地震能譜法求設計反應譜”,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,田堯彰教授指導,1992年6月。 [14]Chopra, A. K., and Geol, R. K., “ Model Pushover Analysis of SAC Building”, San Diego, California, 2001. [15]Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. “ The N2 Method for the Seismic Damage Analysis for RC buildings”, Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics Vol. 25, 31-46, 1996. [16]許茂雄,“由強震資料探討學校建築反應特性”,89年度防災專案計畫成果研討會文集,地震與地震工程,NAPHM 89-P02。 [17]C.H. Loh and R.C. Ho, “ Seismic damage assessment based on different hysteretic rules”, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19, 753-771, 1990. [18]Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M.A. “ Simple and Complex Models for Nonlinear Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures”, Report UILU-ENG-79-2031, Department of Civil Engineering,University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, August 1979. [19]Sues, R. H., Mau, S. T., and Wen, Y.-K., “ System identification of degrading hysteretic restoring force.”, J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, Vol. 1145(5),833-846, 1988. [20]Baber, T. T. and Noori, M. N., “ Random Vibration of degrading, pinching systems.” J. Engrg. Mech. ASCE, Vol.111(8),1010-1026, 1985. [21]Foliente, G.C., “ Hysteresis modeling of wood joint and structure systems.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, Vol.121(6), 1013-1022 ,1995. [22]Wang, C. H. and Wen, Y. K. “ Evaluation of Pre-Northridge Low-Rise Steel Building. I: Modeling”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 1160-1168, October 2000. [23] Jacobsen LS. “ Damping in composite structures” Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2, Tokyo and Kyoto: Japan, 1029-1044, 1960. [24]Gulkan P, Sozen M. “ Inelastic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures to Earthquakes Motions” ACI Journal 71:604-610, 1974. [25]Kowalsky MJ., “ Displacement-based Design- a methodology for seismic design applied to RC bridge columns.”, Master’s Thesis, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, 1994. [26]Rosenblueth E, Herrera I., “ On a kind of hysteretic damping”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics Devision ASCE,90:37-48, 1964. [27]Iwan WD, “ Gates NC. Estimating Earthquake Response of Simple Hysteretic Structures”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE,105:391-405, 1979. [28]Iwan WD, “ Estimating Inelastic Response Spectra from Elastic Sectra”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,8:375-388, 1980. [29]Newmark NM, Hall WJ., “ Earthquake Spectra and Design”, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA, 1982. [30]Miranda E., “ Inelastic displacement ratios for Structures on firm sites”, Journal of Structural Engineering,126:1150-1159,2000. [31]Miranda, E. and Ruiz-Garcia J., “ Evaluation of Approximate Methods to Estimate Maximum Inelastic Displacement Demands,” Earthquake Engineering and Structures Dynamics, Vol. 31, pp. 539-560, 2002. [32]Park, Y. J. and Ang, A. H-S., “ Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. ST4, 722-739, 1985. [33] Park, Y. J. and Ang, A. H-S., and Wen, Y. K., “ Damage-limiting a seismic design of buildings.”, Earthquake Spectra, 3(1), 1-26, 1987. [34]Powell, G. H., and Allahabadi, R., “ Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: Concepts and procedures,” Earthquake Engineering struct. Dyn., 16:719-734, 1998. [35]Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., and Ramasco, R., “ The use of damage fuctionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods,” Earthquake Engineering struct. Dyn., 22:855-868, 1993. [36]Fajfar, P., “ Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue.” Earthquake Engineering struct. Dyn., 21:837-848, 1992. [37]Yousef Bozorgnia and Vitelmo V. Bertero, “ Damage Spectra:Characteristics and Applications to Seismic Risk Reduction”,J. of Structural Engineering, Vol.129,1330-1340, 2003. [38]ASTM E917-94, “ Standard practice for measuring life-cycle costs of buildings and building system”. [39]Ehlen, M. A., “ Life-cycle costs of new construction materials”, J. of Infrastructure System, Vol.3(4),129-133, 1997. [40]Rowe,D.P., “ Whole life performance strategy: beyond incremental cost and service life”, Durability of building Materials and Components 8, 1881-1892, 1999. [41]Al-Hajj, A., “ Modelling running and maintenance costs for life cycle costing applications in buildings”, Durabiliy of Building Materials and Components 8, 1699-1706, 1999. [42]Arditi, D. and Messhiha H. M., “ Life cycle cost analysis(LCCA) in municipal organizations”, J. of Infrastructure Systems, Vol.5(1),1-10, 1999. [43]石塚義雄,“建築生命週期管理”,井上書院,2001年。 [44]日本建設省報告書,”新建築構造體系的開發”,平成10年(1998)。 [45]Structural Engineers Association of California, “ Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings,” , 1995. [46]Ang A. H-S, “ Basis for earthquake-resistant design with tolerable structural damage”, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. On Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering (ICASP5), Vancouver BC, Canada, Vol. 1, 407-416, 1987. [47]Ang A.H-S., Kim W.J. Kim S.B., “ Damage estimation of existing bridge structures, Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation”, Proc. ASCE Structures Congress 1993, Irvine CA, Vol.2, 1137-1142, 1993. [48]M. Saiidi and M. A. Sosen,“ Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures”, J. structure div. ASCE 107,937-952, 1981. [49] Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M., “ Consistent Inelastic Design Spectra: Hysteretic and Input Energy,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Vol. 23, pp. 523-537, 1994. [50] Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M., “ Consistent Inelastic Design Spectra: Strength and Displacement,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Vol. 23, pp.507-521, 1994. [51] Kunnath S.K., Reinhorn A. M., Lobo R.F., IDARC version 3.0: “ A program for the inelastic damage analysis of RC structures,” Technical Report NCEER-92-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research,State University of New York, Buffalo NY, 1992. [52]Uang, C. M. ,and Bertero V. V., “ Evaluation of Seismic Energy in Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 19, 77-90, 1990. [53]Rafael Riddell, Jaime E. Garcia and Eugenio Garces, “ Inelastic deformation response of SDOF systems subjected to earthquake”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31:515-538, 2002. [54]羅俊雄,簡文郁及鍾昇財,“地震危害度分析”,國立台灣大學工學院地震工程研究中心,88年8月。 [55]Campbell, K. W., “ Near-Source Attenuation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 2039-2070, 1981. [56]Cheung, S. T. and C. H. Loh, “ Identification and Verification of Seismic Demand from Different Hysteretic Models, ” J. of Earthquake Engineering, March, 331-355, 2002. [57]內政部建築研究委託研究計畫,“建築物耐震性能設計法之性能目標與相關項目研究”,2002年12月。 [58]IBC, “ International Building Code”, 2000 Edition,Whittier,CA, 2000. [59]Gunturi S.K.V., Shah H.C., “ Mapping structural damage to monetary damage”,Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation: Proc. ASCE Structures Congress 1993, Irvine,Ca, USA,Vol.2,1331-1336, 1993. [60]交通部委託研究計畫,“橋梁生命週期成本評估方法與結構使用年限之建立”,2004年2月。 [61]日本建設省報告書,“建築結構之新工程架構發展”,平成10年, 1998。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39345 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文主要內容分為三個部分:首先由建立結構物的性能目標曲線開始,進而討論結構物受地震作用損壞後之性能目標曲線的變化情形,最後再運用性能目標曲線的調整,探討結構物於生命週期內的經濟效益。
由於本文係採用Park和Ang的損害度指數為基礎,做為代表性能水準之參數,為建立該損害度指數之重要參數-累積遲滯能的估算方法,需分別介紹γ-spectrum及非線性位移反應譜,再據以計算累積遲滯能。其次,本文之設計水準係以地震於該特定工址發生之年超越機率(或迴歸期)做為參數,因此,本文採用地震危害度分析的方法,瞭解特定結構物於特定工址所承受的地震危害度,並藉以建立性能水準及設計水準二者間的關係(即為該結構物之性能目標曲線),以提供設計者初步設計時之參考。 第二部分將由遲滯能可累積的概念開始介紹,進而說明損害度也是可以由數次地震所造成的損害,予以分別累積的。藉由該等概念,本文將發展估算曾遭受一次地震損害的結構物,於下一次地震期間所吸收的遲滯能之計算模式。最後,本文將發展結構物因受地震損壞後,其性能目標變化的評估方法。設計者可參考結構物性能目標變化的結果,評估該結構物是否仍在原設計的性能需求範圍內。如果該結構物已不敷原使用用途之性能需求時,亦可藉由本法評估是否可以變更使用用途因應,而不需予以補強。 第三部分將藉由討論損害度對建物造成之價值(收益)減損及成本增加,並以建物於生命週期中之總淨收益必須符合業主需求為基本考量原則,選取建物最佳之性能目標曲線,除可提供設計者決定建物之最佳設計性能目標,並讓業主瞭解其所負擔的風險,及未來的收益情形。藉此提供業主及設計者討論結構物經濟效益、風險及性能等參數的平臺。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Through the concept of seismic hazard assessment and the damage index criteria, a new approach to assess the performance of the structure with respect to the level of earthquake excitation is developed in this research. Through Fajfar’s hysteretic energy model and Park and Ang damage index, the damage-related hazard curves are generated. The parameters to be considered in these hazard curves include capacity and demand of system ductility, hysteretic dissipation energy capacity of the structural system, and structural period. Similarly, through the concept of dissipated energy during a sequence of earthquakes and the proposed damage consistent hazard curves, the residual energy capacity of a “pre-damaged” structure can be estimated, too. Re-estimation on the performance objective after a series of earthquake excitation can be conducted. Seismic ground motion data collected from Taiwan were used to generate the regression model in this study. In addition, the benefit of a structure during its life cycle can be estimated with the concept of performance objective. Through the economy parameter (B/C ratio), life cycle and expected damage level during its life cycle, the platform is established for client and designer to discuss what performance the structure should reach. It’s the major mechanism in performance based design. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:26:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-D88521026-1.pdf: 928716 bytes, checksum: d3066999ad34c5e4bce1ae2b1fc79709 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章緒論 1-1
1.1研究動機與背景 1-1 1.2文獻回顧 1-2 1.3研究目標 1-4 第二章 性能目標曲線之建立 2-1 2.1性能水準與設計水準的定義 2-1 2.2 遲滯能吸收的重要參數―γ spectrum 2-4 2.2.1 γ spectrum的各項參數介紹 2-4 2.2.2單自由度結構系統運動方程式及遲滯能之定義 2-6 2.3遲滯能的預測模式 2-7 2.3.1非線性位移反應譜 2-8 2.3.2遲滯能的預估 2-9 2.4地震危害度分析 2-9 2.5遲滯能的地震危害度分析 2-11 2.6建立損害指標(Damage index)的地震危害度曲線 2-13 2.7示範例 2-16 2.8討論 2-18 第三章 結構受震損壞對性能目標曲線之影響評估 3-1 3.1結構系統性能目標的介紹 3-1 3.2能量及損害可累積的特性 3-3 3.2.1 損害指標的累積非為線性相加 3-3 3.2.2 損害可累積導致結構物倒塌 3-4 3.3已受損結構物之遲滯能估算方法 3-4 3.4性能目標的轉變 3-8 3.5示範例 3-10 3.6 討論 3-11 第四章 性能目標曲線之應用 4-1 4.1建物的生命週期(使用年限) 4-2 4.1.1各國規範之設計使用年限及設計地震力 4-3 4.1.2各國設計規範對與「使用年限」有關之名詞定義 4-4 4.1.3生命週期之定義-以地震造成之破壞為依據 4-6 4.1.4生命週期與超越機率的關係 4-7 4.2 建物於生命週期內的總成本 4-10 4.3建物總淨效益的評估模式 4-14 4.3.1建物於生命週期內的總淨收益 4-14 4.3.2基底剪力比值 之計算方法 4-18 4.3.3 結構物性能目標最佳化評估程序 4-19 4.4 示範例 4-21 4.4.1案例一-以調整性能目標曲線法為例 4-21 4.4.2案例二-以調整基底剪力法為例 4-23 4.5討論 4-24 第五章 結論與建議 5-1 5.1結論 5-1 5.2建議 5-2 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 性能設計法-性能目標之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on Performance Objective for Performance Based Seismic Design | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡益超,蔡克銓,張國鎮,黃震興,李有豐 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 生命週期,損害度,性能設計, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | damage index,life cycle,performance based design, | en |
dc.relation.page | 126 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 906.95 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。